Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, January 04, 2008
Larry Kudlow :: Townhall.com Columnist
Goldilocks Needs Tax-Reform, Not Populism
by Larry Kudlow
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Yes, corporate profits are slowing and jobs are softening. Despite 52 months of ongoing jobs gains and 1.3 million new payrolls in the past year, December jobs registered only 18,000 and the unemployment rate ticked back up to (a still historically low) 5 percent. Despite years of gains from a booming business sector, corporate profits are in fact falling at about a 6 percent clip.

But the last thing we need now is root-canal economic populism from the campaign trail and the mainstream media telling us that Americans are unhappy. Unhappy? According to a Gallup Poll released last week, “Most Americans say they are generally happy, with a slim majority saying they are ‘very happy.’” They’re also prosperous. According to Investor’s Business Daily, household wealth in the U.S. soared 51 percent to $58.6 trillion in last year’s third quarter from $38.8 trillion in 2002.

Meanwhile, the Goldilocks economy remains alive and well. It’s still the greatest story never told. And while Goldilocks may have softened somewhat, getting her back on track is not rocket science.

The key thing to remember is that businesses drive the economy. Businesses create jobs and incomes for consumers to spend. Today’s John Edwards/Mike Huckabee anti-business populism sounds more like William Jennings Bryan than Adam Smith. It’s absolutely crazy. They attack Wall Street and investors, which is another way of attacking capital. Without capital investment, there will be no new business, no new jobs, and no middle class.

And the reality is that today’s economic weakness is coming from the business side, not the sub-prime/housing/consumer side. We’re witnessing high energy and raw-material prices cause unit costs for businesses to rise faster than prices. That spells weakening profits.

As for this notion that consumers are tapped out, take a look at disposable income. After inflation, it’s rising better than 2 percent. Strong income gains of 3.7 percent for hourly earnings are running 1 percentage point ahead of inflation measures based on personal consumption. As it happens, car sales were strong this week. They’re running 3.6 percent at an annual rate, ahead of the third quarter. Even holiday sales have surprised on the upside.

All of this is why the Fed needs to deliver a 50 basis point rate cut at its January 30 meeting. A big-bang rate cut would help businesses, consumers, and mortgage owners. It would make the cost of money cheaper and expand the overall liquidity base of the economy.

Some folks argue that rising inflationary pressures would offset these benefits. But that’s nonsense. Inflation is the most overrated issue out there. Even when you factor in energy, headline inflation for 2007 is going to come in below the prior year while inflation for 2008 should be even lower than that.

Back in 2000-01, when the economy was slowing markedly, the Fed obsessed about inflation. They were wrong, and then took a radical u-turn. It can’t be the same story again. The money supply hasn’t grown in a few years while inflation is poised to go way down. The Fed must act, and act big. After that, elected Washington can do the rest.

Right now the single best thing President Bush and Congress can do is slash the corporate tax rate for large and small businesses. Bush must reach out to Charlie Rangel and move the corporate tax to 25 percent from 35 percent. Then, instead of taxing successful capitalists as an offset, Congress can entirely abolish corporate-tax subsidy loopholes, special provisions, and other corruption-inducing K-Street earmarks.

A middle-class tax cut to help families and small businesses would also work wonders. This can be done by collapsing the three middle-income tax brackets of 15 percent ($15,650), 25 percent ($63,700), and 28 percent ($128,500) into one 15 percent bracket. These brackets apply to small-business owners who may be suffering the high costs of energy and raw materials. The biggest weakness in the jobs report is the household survey which is comprised of these owner-operated small businesses. Household job increases have slumped to only 262,000 over the last year.

A major cut in the corporate tax and a simplification of the middle-income tax brackets makes good economic sense. It would help the current softening of the economy and increase America’s long-run potential to grow. This is a good plan for President Bush as well as the GOP candidates on the campaign trail. It sure as hell beats talking the economy down.

America is an optimistic country, and for the life of me I don’t know why the Republican presidential candidates can’t understand this. If a few things go wrong we can fix them. That’s what the Fed is there for and that’s what tax policy is there for.

Just because Goldilocks is alive and well, it doesn’t mean she can’t use a bit of help.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC's Kudlow & Company

Be the first to read Lawrence Kudlow's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Populism?
Mr. Kudlow,

I am self-employed and I understand and agree with much of what you have said here. But "populism" is a somewhat vague term. Commonly interpreted, no, the country cannot survive on populism. There is another perspective, however, that some seem to be missing in their analysis of Huckabee. I'm not that much of an expert with words, but I believe that there is a lot more to the survival, and prosperity, of this country than economic policies alone. Many of the people going for Huckabee are values voters, and that goes well beyond "populism" per se. Some of us feel we are seeing a prosperous country yes, but if our moral foundation rots out from under us all the economics in the world will not save us. There are people who are deeply disturbed by the increasing moral and ethical decay we believe we we are seeing about us. It's not just "evangelical" Christians. There is a lot more to it than that.

Unemployment numbers up sharply
Economists reacting to the ugly rise in unemployment figures (remember, the stats have already been rigged to under-report) are “looking for a bunker to hide in.” Is it any wonder populist candidates are doing so well? As usual, Bush has his finger on the pulse, saying “the nation’s “financial markets are strong and solid.”

WSJ: The sharp jump in the unemployment rate — from 4.7% to 5.0% — may be the most alarming feature of this report. Single-month increases that large occur only rarely and most often near business cycle turning points. Indeed, the last time the unemployment rate rose 0.35 in a single month was September 2001. Tellingly, the jobless rate also jumped 0.3% in January of 2001, just before the business cycle peak in March 2001. –David Resler, Nomura Securities

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/unemployment-numbe rs-up-sharply


Kudlow is warped
"We’re witnessing high energy and raw-material prices cause unit costs for businesses to rise faster than prices. That spells weakening profits."

True.
So what's Kudlow's solution? Lower interest rates even further! Weaken the dollar even more!

A weakening dollar will make imported raw materials, especially oil, even more expensive for American businesses, adding to their costs even further and hurting business expansion. That's precisely the stagflation we saw back in the 1970s under Carter.

As for Kudlow's claim that "headline inflation for 2007 is going to come in below the prior year while inflation for 2008 should be even lower than that", that's the faked "core rate" of CPI he's talking about again.

The "core rate" of the CPI deliberately excludes food and fuel prices, a Government ploy to understate true inflation. Yet food and fuel are the prices that are rising fastest now.

To tell an American family, or a business, that inflation is fine, except for the fact that gasoline is heading for $4.00 a gallon and the price of food is doubling, is absurd. The Government can leave fuel prices out of its CPI statistics. But I can't leave fuel prices out of my household budget. And a salesman who needs his car to travel to his clients, can't leave fuel prices out of his expense account.

Kudlow's judgment has been warped by his obvious desire to keep the GOP in power at all costs. That means stimulating the economy now, even if it creates big inflation in 2009-2010, just so the GOP keeps the White House.

No thank you. Do I want to keep the Dems out of the White House? Yes! But do I want to do it by restarting stagflation? No! I would rather lose the White House to the Democrats than wreck the U.S. economy.

It's as simple as that.


Kudlow writes
"December jobs registered only 18,000...".

Over the 14 years I have lived and worked in US, I've seen very few projects started in December; usually, hiring decisions are either done prior to Thanksgiving, or put-off till January.

Goldilocks and the big bear
Kudlow sees the bear coming. His Goldilocks schlick of the past month is going to come back to bite him. He's no better at economic fortune telling than he was in the summer/fall of '06 when he predicted a sustained drop in the price of oil. Haven't seen him spill a drop of ink to explain that mistaken prediction.
In this article he is half right about who Huckabee skewers. Huck does skewer the street. But not the investor. Fact is the "street" skims, bilks, overbills and overcharges investors something fierce. The little guy investor is pounded by the "street" boys every chance they get.
Kudlow works furiously to convince us that they are one and the same. Forget that. The street works for IPO fees, transaction fees, golden parachutes, ludicrous compensation packages, ludicrous bonuses. Who pays for that? The little guy stockholder; you and I with our 401k's and mutual funds.
Kudlow don't want you to start thinking like that but it is the truth. The boys on the "street" the corporate boards and corporate management together comprise a huge, huge siphon hose on little guy investment pools.
NOt only can't you make accurate predictions, Mr. Kudlow, you are a propoganda artist for those who sop the little investor. I know your game now.

Dont worry about inflation
Oil prices act like a tax on the economy simply because payments for the raw material leave the country, not to be totally included in the speed of money or mulitplier effect. Add to that a devalued dollar which acts as a price increase on goods coming from abroad. The increase also acts as a tax since so much of what we consume comes from overseas. Combine all those price increases and they soak up excess liquidity without adding a mulitplier effect.
The real scare is a rescession caused by an imperceptable deflation. Imperceptable because so many folks erroneously believe price increases alone are surefire signs of inflation. Not so. I am more inclined towards a monetary definition and this scenario ain't fitting the mold.
Recession and a deflation that is masked by price increases due to the rise in oil and import prices. Mark it down. Kudlow don't know.

Yes, the culture is rotting
I see the prime example of this "rotting" as the acceptance of the "I was going to attack my opponent but I am too good for that and by the way, if I weren't so good, here are the bad things I would say". And "if Romney is elected you may as well put the Presidency on eBay and sell it".

True positive campaigning. Taking the high road. Even after the "win' Rollins was complaining about the other candidates negative attacks.
And the majority of evangelicals in Iowa bought it.

Good luck.

Tax reform...
True tax reform starts with chucking our income tax code and replacing it with a Flat Tax or
Fair Tax.
Huckabee is the only candidate to use the research and intelligence that economists and scholars have provided.

Like Huck or not we need real reform.

Huckabee is your answer
You want to cut corporate tax and close loopholes. Huckabee wants to completely cut out corporate tax, there wouldn't be any loopholes. But Huckabee is bad for business? Townhall is becoming the loony right.

Pinto Man
Huckabee is a Snake-oil salesman.

Wait until people start learning that he's getting help from Fred Phelps and his family. And if Fred Phelps is helping, we can assume his sicko Westboro Baptist Church is helping also.

If you want someone you can trust with the economy, then vote for a real Conservative. Vote for Fred Thompson.

Kudlow needs a new barometer
Personally, I think we are due for a business cycle turn that could in fact become a recession. They usually occur at a normal rate of every 8 to 10 years and how bad they are is reflection of what the administration and congress does just before the turnaround.

In the last recession congress and Clinton enacted massive tax increases. This caused a business downturn at the same time a downturn was already looming. These combined to form a strong recession. When 9-11 happened this could really have gone into a much more massive recession and possibly even a depression if not handled properly. Thankfully we had wiser heads in office and the recession was damped by tax cuts. The economy rebounded and overall tax revenues have hit record heights. Too bad that overall spending has also hit record heights.

What we do not need right now is a Charlie Rangel style tax increase, or even worse, a dose of John Edwards style Communism. Throw those things in and combine them with a business downturn and a restrictionist trade law being passed and guess what you get… a 1930s style depression.

that was
the dumbest article I have read in a long time.
I read it 3 times to make sure I was reading it correctly.

Spending is the Problem
It doesn't matter what your tax structure looks like if we continue to spend at unsustainable rates. The government is taking more and more of what the nation produces. If this trend is not reversed it will not matter who is president or if yor taxes are flat or look like the Himalayas.

We can do it the smart way and manage it so the economy catches up to the size of government or we can be dumb and have it collapse on top of us. For the most part government is dumb. Look for a painful lesson.

Mel
I'm no fan of Huck or BHO, but i am encouraged by the winds of change their performance in Iowa indicates. Hillary, Mitt and Rudy represent the status quo and it was great to see them take it in the shorts.

Writer
Does he office with Robert Novak??

Liar
Kudlow, why don't you quit spreading those damn lies? 5.0% is not a historical low. 3.9% is a historical low -- under Bill Clinton.

All anyone has to do is go to BLA.gov and look it up for themselves. Quit spreading those damn lies.

I'm a conservative, but I'm so damn tired of lies being spread by both sides.

Kudlow, A Member of the CFR
If everything is beautiful, why do "we" need a Fed 50 basis point change? Isn't there enough money in circulation without another bailout? And Kudlow says there is no recession at our doorstep and inflation is almost nonexistent. Anyone buy a gallon of gasoline yesterday? It is up about 11% locally but that is not inflation. If no inflation, why does it take 1 1/2 boxes of greenbacks to buy a Euro? And if free trade is so great why are we in a downturn and China, Brazil, India and Russia in an upturn. It now requires 1 1/2 boxes of greenbacks to buy a box of Chinese lead stuff and Kudlow wants more greenbacks printed. Kudlow, part of our huge peculiar economic loss is the result of free and predatory lending. Now that there is a price to be paid for that, Kudlow wants the Fed to print more money. Kudlow, is that free enterprise or competition? Or is it expansion of government? If you ever were a good economist, you have lost your marbles. You ought to be railing against government for its socialistic actions.

My Faterh always told me
there were lies, damned lies and statistics. Larry Kudlow represents the last. Another shill for the greedy who having raped the american consumers in their all consuming drive for increasing profits but little care for the average worker want the gravy train to go on forever and have helicopter Ben print more money to cover them. As a small business owner, I have to pay for my mistakes, the idiots who made bad loans and the fools who listen to Kudlow and Cramer should have to do the same as well.

Sorry, I Forgot
Please Kudlow, quit over-talking your guests on your TV show. I am aware of your views on stuff like the Fed and recession, but you act like Hardball Matthews with his large mouth over-talking guests.

Pat Buchanan: Day of Reckoning
Great interviews with Pat Buchanan on trade, immigration and the economy!

Pat Buchanan: Day of Reckoning

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/pat-buchanan-day-o f-reckoning


Inflation is the most overrated issue...
Are you nuts? Inflation is entirely the cause of the slowing economy. Perhaps paying 3 plus dollars a gallon for gas doesn't hurt a wealthy guy like you. This is the Bush economy. We are paying for his and his party's profligate spending with inflation and a consequent declining economy. We don't need populism and we don't need Bush and his admirers like yourself. Bush boom! Yeah, right!

Larry
I hope, that you realize, that some people have "EYES" and a "BRAIN"!We on TH knew months ago, that unemployment would rise.When you see production accelerate,managers are storing up inventories.The offshoot of this action is LAYOFFS.How does one not know this?If you really want to tell people something,tell them how many months of inventory exist.This will give you an insight; into how long managers, think this present condition of the economy,will last.Also,American businesses don't need a cut in TAXES.They need to grow some baseballs,so that they can challenge the awful regulations, that exist in Europe and other places.Everything we export is made more costly for "US" to produce,due to regulations.If we can expand our markets,we will get our currency balanced and real Prosperity will follow.Yes the economy is fundamentally STRONG.No "LIES" are required!!!

para_dimz
Dear para_dimz,

At our college, we have a retirement plan that is mandatory; it is deposits into an investment plan, and we don't get to choose the investments. It's just one package and you get units of investments as your retirement package. Now, you seem to indicate that for the small investor, this is probably not a very good investment. Over time, what is the probability that the deposits to this plan will be worth less than the aggregate initial deposits?

I know another instructor at the colege who back well several years ago in another retirement plan at the college, you could choose to have your money invested in the market or just kept sitting in the college fund. She opted for the investment plan and after 5 years she decided to change over to the college fund, but in order to do that she would have to come up with the $80,000 the investment plan difference as compared with the same investments in the college fund. So in effect, she lost $80,000 of her retirement fund.

Without have ample of money on the side, don't the commercials always tell you not to spseculate on the retirement funds you absolutely are counting on? And, also, is there really any chance that social security will n ot be there, nor Medicare, for us baby boomers in te coming decade? I have some teacher's pension for working for the state, but not much, and I really need my social security.

Jeanne-marie: I don't know at WHAT

college you claim to be teaching, but I would hope that any college prof would give an "F" to any paper that was turned in with the spelling and grammar errors in your post.

I realize the quality of education has gone straight downhill in past years, but one would at least hope that those teaching at a college level would have a slightly better grasp of English.



Amazing - -
- - what I've found to be so thoroughly sickening is the ignorance of the Baptist bunch (and/or assorted James Dobson types to whom gay crap and anti-CHOICE stuff trumps everything else, especially the Strength issue) - - that those preachers/pontificators could snow the electorate into believing that Huckabee is a conservative?
He's a big government/big spending fiasco, and those dumb people observed in those "focus groups" with their inane views just prior to the Iowa mess.....? 60% were evangelical types and 80% of those sheep/lemmings believed the pastor types and their sanctimonious silliness?
GadZooks!
Sorry, gang, but it's a question of priorities, and, if we don't survive as a country, there's no way you can beat down those nefarious gays or those who don't adhere to the anti abortion propaganda.
And the only guy with the much required STRENGTH to reverse this disgusting Pabulum Pule populism and Terminal Political Correctness? Rudy Giuliani.
Now, that said, how'bout yanking the tax-exempt status of Jesse Jackson, Dobson and those aforementioned preachers, Al Sharpton and any other religious type breaking the tax laws!?!

frost
"Sorry, gang, but it's a question of priorities, and, if we don't survive as a country, there's no way you can beat down those nefarious gays or those who don't adhere to the anti abortion propaganda."

You've got it all wrong. If our nation doesn't regain some respect for human life and traditional marriage, no army on earth will be able to save us.

Anne @ 10:24
Unfortunately, you cannot assume that newer profs have actually learned anything. I can remember my dad complaining in 1981 about students taking 3RD-YEAR math courses at UCalgary making (on exams) the erroneous simplification 1/(a+b) = 1/a + 1/b.

Extrapolating downhill from there over 27 years, it is not at all difficult to see how Jeanne-Marie could become a prof.

Vic 2:46am
Dear Vic,

I remember those business cycles you are talking about, now that I think back. It also effected employment, for a bunch of years, jobs are scarce and you're happy to make anything, then all of a sudden growth, and there are jobs everywhere, and pay raises, and 3 weeks vacation a year, way back in the '70's. Yea, and the next thing, people are buying houses, and real estate goes up.

Well, one thing I'm concerned about is our foreign policy that's costing us proobably my Social Security, and maybe my son's, too. I know that to some extent we have agreements with other nations to help protect them should they come under attack. I was in the old principal's office watching the World Trade Tower 2 come down, and you know what Gulliani did for New York was what they needed in the state of crisis they had been engaged in. Look, London faces these bombings all the time. What else can they do but be alert and prepared. But they didn't go to war with Iraq,,, probably because they knew that the real culprits would not be gotten that way; and, because they don't have the financial resources to go to all out war with Iraq. They have been great helpers to us, but they have not chosen to attack on their own; they can't afford a sustained emotional or financial effort.

What I'm suggesting is that, like everything else in the budget, we have to made decisions, and going to war is a decision we have to discuss, debate, consider the economy and the sustained war effort on the strained Army Reserves already. Isn't a long term war effort subject to budget balancing, too?

I know this is going to sound unpatriotic, but if we didn't, and we didn't, have enough men, without having them do 2 and 3 tours at a time, and I know you're going to hate me for this, but Halliburton IS a conflict of interest for our own vice president, somehow that should have been avoided...for the sake of integrity, you think?

total tax reform
WE THE PEOPLE PAY ALL TAXES. REGARDLESS WHERE GOVERNMENT INITIALLY COLLECTS THE MONEY, ALL TAX MONEY ULTIMATELY COMES FROM US, THE PEOPLE. SINCE WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE ONE AND ONLY SOURCE OF ALL TAX REVENUE:
THERE SHOULD BE ONLY ONE TAX TO COLLECT ALL TAX REVENUE. IT SHOULD BE A SINGLE, SIMPLE, FAIR, DIRECT, GRADUATED, INDIVIDUAL, FULL-INCOME TAX LEVIED ON LIVING PERSONS FOR EACH LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT: ONE TAX AND DONE.
THE BEST THING THAT GOVERNMENT CAN DO TO HELP THE COUNTRY, THE PEOPLE, AND EVEN GOVERNMENT, IS TO REPEAL ALL OF THE MANY HUNDREDS, OR THOUSANDS OF EXISTING TAXES, FEES, AND CHARGES. THESE TAXES ARE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PRICE WE PAY FOR HEALTHCARE AND EVERYTHING ELSE, AND WHAT WE WOULD PAY IF THEY WERE REPEALED: 1/3 LESS. ELIMINATING THESE TAXES WILL REMOVE THEM FROM THE PRICE PAID FOR EVERYTHING BY EVERYONE, INCLUDING GOVERNMENT. THESE TAXES ARE THE FEDERAL DEFICIT. THESE TAXES ARE THE HIGH PRICE OF EVERYTHING. THESE TAX CUTS ARE SPENDING CUTS. EVERY TAX THAT IS ELIMINATED IS A TAX THAT WE THE PEOPLE NO LONGER HAVE TO PAY
THERE IS NO LIMIT TO THE BENEFITS ONE TAX AND DONE WILL PROVIDE.

SeekerOfTruth is right
SeekerOfTruth I have to agree with you. This is a dumb article.

Kudlow thinks that by resuffling the cards (rearranging the tax brackets) you'll fix the problem.

Huckabee's the only one who isn't afraid to address the root of economic difficulties in the US, the tax system.

As anyone who has run a business knows, the US tax code is outrageous and forces you to do a lot of things that have nothing to do with your business. You spend so much effort tracking and trying to determine your income. There are so many different buckets of income that are taxed at different rates or not taxed at all. You make decisions that choose sub optimum alternatives from the business standpoint because they are optimal solutions when you consider the tax consequences.

It is foolish for a government to force businesses to work in an inefficient manner by enacted illogical tax laws.

Huckabee's support of the Fair tax is not populism. Larry, that is a rediculous and ignorant comment.

I'm An Evangelical
Edwards is a communist. Huckabee is a socialist. A real Jimmy Carter (worst president in 20th century) wannabe.

I am heartily ashamed of my evangelical brothers and sisters who are so ignorant of Huckabees record and are voting for him because he was a Baptist pastor. Its a disgrace!

Huckabee will amnesty 15 million new Democrats. They will turn our nation into a socialist welfare state with the help of the liberals.

These new Democrats will go to their employers and demand real American wages and benefits. The employers will look for new illegals to replace them and we will have 10 million new Democrats on the unemployment dole. Right where the Democrats want them.

RA
Count me with RA above. Huckabee is not a practicing Christian when it comes to executive decision making, or to political campaigning. His disingenous attacks of Romney, and his dishonest ploys are not the values I seek in a POTUS.

RA @ 12:02 writes
"Edwards is a communist; Huckabee is a socialist, a real Jimmy Carter (worst president in 20th century) wannabe"

IMO, one could drop the qualifier "in 20th century" about Jimmuh.

I'm seriously tempted to write in the name of my favourite entertainer (I know for a fact she would fail the birth-in-US test) for President and maybe "Jose Cuervo" (pilfered from the alcohol-brand) for VP, given the lacklustreness of the current crop of candidates.

Goldilocks Needs Tax Reform
Dear Mr Kudlow,

Gov Huckabee attained his winning margin because of his support for the FairTax. I know people who were at the Iowa caucus function in August and it was the FairTax (not the evangelical thing) that got many Iowans excited. Our income tax and payroll tax collection mechanisms are a mess. This is especially true since the Social Security fund was moved into the general fund as part of Johnson's "guns and butter" strategy.

No tax collection system has been more thoroughly researched by competent experts. The demagogueing of the FairTax by Wall Street, the WSJ, and pundits at townhall.com and elsewhere shows that they have not read the bill (HR25) or are just lying about its effects. They are not so dumb that they don't get that the FairTax strips the power that political and monetarist elites now use to manipulate us and protect themselves.

We wouldn't be bailing out greedy Wall Street financiers on the sub prime mortgage/CDO crisis if the FairTax was in place. And more and more people now get the fact that the Fed is printing money, inflating the M3 money supply by more than 16% since March 2006 and that its the value of our money going down and not the price of goods going up. Its almost impossible for the middle class to invest today and stay ahead of real inflation.

Things are not that great in real financial terms for the middle class. And let's not forget it was a Republican president, Teddy Roosevelt, who resurrected the income tax from the political ashes in 1906 and his former secretary of state who as attorney general under Taft probably committed fraud in declaring the 16th Amendment ratified.

War spending
A lot of people seem to think war spending is the big culprit of government spending thus causing the deficit. Social spending is the culprit, always has been. Oppressive taxes in all parts of our economy are the problem. The 16th amendment was probably the biggest burden ever put on the American people.
Don't worry about social security, it's just another income tax and the fix is to raise the retirement age to the average life span of 78 years old. That way people die before they can collect their money.

Kudlow wrong as usual
Larry, business doesn't determine the economy as your guests on your show pointed out. It is consumption.

No spending (hopefully from us, not government) and there is no need for a business selling something nobody is buying.

However, this is a where you really aren't thinking
quote:
As for this notion that consumers are tapped out, take a look at disposable income. After inflation, it’s rising better than 2 percent. Strong income gains of 3.7 percent for hourly earnings are running 1 percentage point ahead of inflation measures based on personal consumption.
======================

You forgot that rising interest payments are taking all the "gain" and more and the workers are acually losing buying power from that as well as underreported inflation.

Credit card debt is over $915 billion and with interest rates of 18% to 24% and fees on minimum balances, take all the gains. Or how about the 16.5% deliquency rate on Home Equity loans that indicate "gains" have disappeared with interest on home equity loans. Or how about the "payday loans," that with rollover fees and interest mean some pay 400% for a loan in fees and interest before it is paid off.

How about the millions that can't get anymore home equity loans to pay off credit card debt. What do those "gains" mean to them and a nation with a zero savings rate and falling value in their homes? What about th interest on car loans and how they affect the "gains."

We are a nation addicted to debt so badly at the individual, corporate and government levels that we are losing ground faster than any "gains" we might have.

If consumption drops, we go into a recession.

Semperfi/par
Hard choices have to be forced on people. As long as congress can play Santa they will. When the fecal matter hits the rotary occillator the current crop of congressmen will take their pensions and head for the tall grass.

When Social Security started most workers died before they could collect. Who said you get to retire and play golf for twenty years? People should support themselves not someone that is retired which is the way S.S. works now.

I agree with svpallava
The choice of candidates is abysmal! At this point I am really worried about the future of the Republic.

I do keep reminding myself that the founders were brilliant men who created ways to keep one person from sending the nation down in flames. While many may be suffering Bush Fatigue, people will figure out quickly that a Socialist in the White House is not preferable.

I am angry at the prospect of anyone reaching into my purse to take MY money to "invest" in projects that are doomed to failure. I want someone to explain to me why I should bear the cost of providing substandard services for myself and other Americans. When someone can adeequately explain to me why I should have to pay my hard-earned dollars to take care of the irresponsible without calling me selfish and hateful, I might be able to support someone who is not a complete conservative...but I doubt that day will ever come.

Talking about the good ec.is a dog
The MSM only want weeping and wailing and Dems.

When SS started, only 1 in 10 lived till 65. SS wasn't taxed. It didn't go for disabilty, early (62) retirement, or survivors.

Now SS is tapped by people in their 20s if they qualify for diability, and they can draw on it for 60 years.

SS was once really set aside snd not psrt of general revenues. Johnson stopped that in the 60s to pay for Vietnam. SS wasn't taxed as income, but the Dems. ended that break, also, in 1993 with the huge Clinton tax increase that Al Gore cast the deciding vote for.

SS was never meant to be total, live-on retirement. It was meant to be a supplement and last-ditch income for the destitute. I know someone now who plans to live on her SS after retirement. I tell her you'll get a 1/3 of your current take-home and starve to death. She's an accountant ahd should know better.

Lawrence Kudlow
I stopped reading this article when I got to this sentence: “Today’s JohnEdwards/Mike Huckabee anti-business populism sounds more like…”.
Is this is the writer’s way of trying to subliminally put into people’s minds that Huckabee is not really conservative, by comparing him to John Edwards in this way? Fortunately, as Iowans have recently proven, we are listening to what the candidates themselves are saying and not buying into columnists way of thinking.

Kudlow is worried
that the gravy train from which he and his ilk have been gorging themselves may be at risk.

Fair Tax or Con Job?


I found this comment on the PP explaining issues regarding the fair tax. I hope you find this as educational as I do!

Buzz- I worked in sales taxation for better than 20 years for 9 Fortune 500 companies, and the FAIR???tax bears faint resemblance to state sales taxes.

Objection #1 - It is a CON JOB. The founders of FTorg gathered seed money to the tune of $tens of millions from Enron, Shell Oil, and other capital intensive companies. These $millions were shelled out to the “expert” economists cited ad infinitum in “the Book” as being authoritative. (They are authoritative as any other whore, I suppose, but then I digress. )The capital intensive manipulators have $hundreds of billions in deferred income tax liabilities that are FORGIVEN the moment FT passes.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/fair-tax-or-con-jo b

Jeanne-Marie
Sorry you got dis'd by Anne. I don't know if there was a question for me in your post to me. However, I was not presumptuous to determine you were a professor or a student or a grounds keeper on campus or a cafeteria worker or a janitor. There was no way to know your affiliation to the college.
I hope your investment plans for retirement work out. Just don't listen to Kudlow. Get a real financial advisor. At one time Mr. Kudlow was, to me at least the Jack Webb of economic talking heads; "Just the fact ma'am. Just the facts." He was a more entertaining Louis Ruikhiser from PBS, God Rest His Soul. Nowadays I see another side of Kudlow. He proves himself over time and repeatedly to be just another one of the sheeple, only with a TV show. He can talk the talk but don't know the walk.

Dead Wrong About Huckabee, Mr. Kudlow
Wrong, Mr. Kudlow. Mike Huckabee is hardly anti-business and Americans resent that kind of obvious mistruth.

Also, the founders — and Adam Smith wanted conscience applied to all phases of American life. National interest, as well.

And, as Madison said, men (even capitalists) are not angels.

Businesses are not to be free from a nation of checks and balances, especially when those business are multi-national (or extra-national) entities.

Let’s get real, Mr. Kudlow. Otherwise, you are hurting your own credibility.

spvallava 10:55 am and Anne 10:34 am
Unfortunately, I have come to rely on spell check which is not available here on Town Hall. I will certainly make a note of it to proofread my comments from now on for those of you who have nothing better to get out of a comment than spell check yourself. I am actually more concerned, when I am writing, with the content of what I am writing than getting the keystrokes completely correct. If that secretarial distraction sooooooo does bother you, once you get to a first error, I suggest you discontinue to read the comment so you don't get bent out of shape, since apparently that's the overriding factor upon which you base the quality of a comment.

I hold a BA from the U. of Central Fl. SummaCumLaude, and an MA from the U. of S. FL. and all their computers were equipped with spell check, even in Spanish, my minor, so even for my thesis I wasn't overconcerned with those little details and simply typed merrily away. Force of habit, I suppose. Even on my emails, the computer automatically checks for me before it lets me continue to type. So simply typing away has just become so habit forming.

But as I can see, it apparently does bother some people, this is the frst comment I have hadddddd about this, and as I have read along,I have cine across plenty of typos, which I ignore, being more interested in the content of the comment and not the lack of spell check on Town Hall. But, I shall heed your criticism, since there may be others out there who judge by typos as well and nodt content. Thank you for you concern.

And now we cut to the chase...
"Right now the single best thing President Bush and Congress can do is slash the corporate tax rate for large and small businesses."

And we get to the meat of this propoganda piece. Kudlow once again wants to pander to himself and his cronies.

The BEST thing Bush and Congress can do for the business I work for is open up ANWAR and mandate the building of a dozen new refineries.

I don't care if international corporations pay 100% of their income as taxes. Screw the disloyal pieces of money-grubbing garbage.

However, it always stuns me that personal income taxes increase with the more money you make. Excuse me? Talk about an incentive to fail!

Congress should pass and Bush should sign a 20% across the board tax rate, no deductions, no shelters, no loopholes. No additional special taxes like death-tax or gift-tax.

If they don't have the money they need to play God, then they can just stop giving all that foreign aid out. They can stop the illegal alien invasion so we don't waste our welfare and medical resources.

This from an educator?
"I am actually more concerned, when I am writing, with the content of what I am writing than getting the keystrokes completely correct. If that secretarial distraction sooooooo does bother you, once you get to a first error, "

Just what do you teach? Remedial demagoguery?

Words mean things. What you type is how you express yourself. If you are incoherent because of your typos and grammatical errors, we won't be able to realize that your arguments are incoherent, also.

I'm an American
And I'm UNHAPPY!!!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.