Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
Larry Kudlow :: Townhall.com Columnist
On the low-tax economy, Bush has the story right
by Larry Kudlow
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Some conservatives are alleging that the president suffers from an inability to communicate with the American people, and there may be some overrated truth to this. But in a news conference last Friday, we saw George W. Bush at his communicating best.

Following a meeting with his economic advisors at Camp David, the president let 'er rip, stating that: "The foundation of our economy is solid, and it's strong. Because of the tax cuts we passed, American workers and families and small businesses are keeping more of the money they earn. And they're using that money to drive this economy of ours forward."

Could he be any clearer?

The mainstream media won't report the economic good news. And many on Wall Street don't even want a strong economy, for fear of more rate hikes from the Federal Reserve. The day after the president's Camp David message, The New York Times editorial cried, "Hold the champagne," and proceeded to obsess about a slowdown in housing.

There's no counting how many recessions Times columnist Paul Krugman has predicted, but Bush was exactly right to point out the 4 percent real GDP growth during the first half of 2006, brisk productivity rates, 5.5 million new jobs over the past three years and a historically low 4.8 percent unemployment rate.

Bush's critics say he's whistling past the graveyard. But the president rightly insists, "The entrepreneurial spirit in the country is strong, and that's good for America."

Bush inherited the Internet bubble meltdown from the Clinton years, as well as the corporate scandals. Then came the attacks of 9-11 and the ensuing war. But the Bush recovery also followed suit, the result of slashing high marginal tax rates on investment in mid-2003.

And the recovery continues. Recent strong numbers for retail sales and industrial production suggest a 3.5 percent economic growth rate in the second half of 2006, a far cry from soft-landings, hard-landings or the recession scenarios that are beginning to proliferate.

And when the president says economic growth has had a positive impact on the budget, he's right again. Tax receipts are growing around 14 percent for the second straight year, the biggest gain in a quarter of a century. Income-tax collections, bolstered by the success of owner-operated business entrepreneurs and other self-employed, are helping lift these revenues. These folks, who prefer unincorporated Subchapter S or limited-liability company partnerships, are the ones who show up in the household survey of employment -- which is at a record high.

Meanwhile, non-withheld revenues from lower-taxed capital gains and dividends are paying for themselves. Total tax receipts in 2006 will come in around $2.4 trillion, roughly $400 billion above the tax-collection peak of 2000.

The Congressional Budget Office may now acknowledge that deficit projections were $100 billion too high, but it maintains that only higher taxes in the next 10 years will solve the budget problem. This defies common sense. If it pays less to work and invest after-tax, as implied by the CBO scenario, does anyone truly believe people would work harder to expand the economy? If that were the case, then why not raise tax rates back to 70 percent, where Reagan found them, or 91 percent, where JFK first had them? The CBO's thinking begs credulity.

Yes, $3 gas at the pump has cut into the economic success story. Our biggest economic challenge has been higher energy prices, itself largely a function of the worldwide spread of capitalism and low tax rates that has led to strong global growth. But the heavyweight energy story could be lightening up.

At high prices and profits, market forces are generating more production and less consumption. For the first time in 15 years, the number of new oil wells drilled in the United States has surpassed the 1,000 mark. The rotary rig count is up 23 percent from a year earlier. Total exploration and development is 30 percent higher than last year. Unleaded gasoline futures have been dropping, suggesting relief at the pump.

Meanwhile, bond rates are coming down as the Fed removes excess liquidity to stop inflation. Mortgage rates are now declining, with Wall Street economist David Goldman noting that home prices actually increased slightly in the second quarter, after falling in the first. Much of the housing slack will be taken up by the highly profitable business sector, as resources shift from residential construction to a new boom in commercial and corporate building. Stock markets, by the way, continue to rise, and are within shouting distance of five-year highs.

All this is not to say that the president doesn't have a problem with the Iraq war. He does. But on the low-tax economy, Bush has the story right.

Low tax rates, strong economic growth and shrinking budget deficits -- it's still the greatest story never told.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC's Kudlow & Company

Be the first to read Lawrence Kudlow's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

are we living in the same world?
few are going to buy the bull crap you are attempting to sell, except for a few elete the rest of us are working more and having less disposable income then we did before this joker and his crew hijacked this country. thanks to ignoring an invasion of illegals wages are being held down while the falling american dollar means just about everything has risen in price.---inyrest returns are almost non existant and dividends are a joke.

Firozali A.Mulla MBA Phd
On the low-tax economy, Bush has the story right
By Lawrence Kudlow
Tuesday, August 22, 2006

The oil just after one day has jumped to 78 UD Dollars. Does the speech cover the ever-climbing price of oil and that the war soldiers are tired in Iraq and other places. This has direct connection on economy if not heeded now.

Truthseeker
Where are you living? The last 3 years have been great for investors, the economy is growing steadily without the irrational exuberance and corporate dishonesty allowed in the 90's, and inflation is low. While Bush has the immigration thing totally wrong find me a Clintonista who has it right and I'll vote for him or her--we are all being screwed by our politicians on that one.

economy
George Bush has done a average at best job in the war on Terror.That I challenge to anyojne is a task no other American President would have wanted ,especally having to be the fist American President to have to deal with it.(since Clinton refuse to deal with it on the first Trade Center bombing) the Bush economy has been good,companys are working more and investing more.(the only downside I 've seen is companys are outsoucing way to much work which will be a big problem in the future.) tax cut grade on ecomomy B-.

Truthseeker
Your age is not mentioned and you are making assumptions you are not familiar with. John Kennedy reduced taxes as a priority and thus the economy recovered in the first half of the sixties. There is a choice an investor makes, safe or how much risk do I assume. If the reward is minimized by heavy taxation, then the answer is go safe as the reward is minimized by government.

Truthseeker, you need to search further for the truth as you have not fould it yet.

shoot..
the economy is only good if you have money to begin with. those of us that live at the bottom are paying more than ever for gas, food, utilities, insurance, and health care is out of reach. all those business people he's helping are trying to squeeze more productivity out of their employees for less and less money. we can't compete with chinese slave labor unless we live like chinese slave labor..or mexican slave labor. think how much money we'd have if the irs was eliminated. bring on the fair tax and dump all republican and democratic incumbents and lets get a bunch fresh faces in dc. the good ole boys club is only good for the good ole boys.

TRUTHSEEKER PROVIDES HIS OWN TRUTH
The lone voice from a parallel universe, with its own version of grammar and syntax, suggests that TS is a very young, blue-collar, possibly union member, bottom of the ladder, lightly educated hourly wage earner. He is not a white collar, educated, and salaried wage earner.

Its true that real average HOURLY earnings have declined about 10% (after inflation) over the past three decades (not just since January 20, 2001), but the more inclusive WAGE and SALARY EARNINGS data (after inflation), as provided by the same BLS, is up nearly 90% over the same period and is in line with the 80% increase in retail sales over the same 3 decade period. Surely retail sales didn't grow over 80% during the past 3 decades if all working folks brought home shrinking incomes.

I suspect that narrower average HOURLY earning data, which does not include commissions and bonus payments, is a product of the lower-end, starting/entry-type position that is more subject to the forces of globalization, global market pricing, the end of the Industrial Age and the implications for hourly union wages (since the late-1960s) combined with the emergence of the Information Age and the flight of capital to where it is treated best, than is the more inclusive wage and salary data. And since the AVERAGE HOURLY data is where many folks start-out, there is a built-in statistical bias to a depressed number. In short and over the past 30 years, shrinking blu- collar, steel mill, fast-food, coal miner guys aren't doing nearly as well as the expanding white-collar doctors, lawyers and other professionals.

It appears that TS should have stayed in school and graduated. Take a look around, forget about politics, the rest of America is doing just fine.

Bwwaaahahaha
Seriously, anyone who takes Kudlow seriously is sorely mistaken. If the economy has been so great, why have public, private, and commercial debt all increased significantly? I'll tell you why...what has fueled any of the economic growth we've had over the past few years has been debt. But instead of going into productive assets, it went into crap like unnecessarily large homes, consumer goods, and entertainment. And before anyone criticizes me for daring to question the value judgments of Americans, well, that's just what people on this site do as a matter of course.

People criticizing Truthseeker sound like Barbra Streisand when she questioned how Bush could win because everyone she knew voted for the other guy.

I would add, too, that whether the economy is doing this or that depends on what numbers you look at. Inflation and employment figures are so perverted at this point, who can say what is real? Some economists think we are actually in a recession right now, based on calculations performed the way they were performed 15 years ago.

NOT EVERYONE IS PARTICIPATING IN BOOM
Our constitution only guarantees everyone the right to pursue happiness; it doesn't guarantee happiness for everyone. And like certain dogs, some successful folks simply pursue a little better than others. The 27 maxed-out credit card, interest only mortgage, 3-leased autos, credit/debt abusing crowd will always find themselves far behind the pack, whinning and complaining about the success enjoyed by others. The view never changes for the #2-dog pulling the sled. Like the bible says, "the poor will always be among us;" and there will always be #2-dogs. This bunch remains stuck in its own self-made quagmire without an exit strategy.

Meanwhile, Americans have accumulated some $55 trillion in NET worth. During that very same period, the # 2-dog/whiners have only managed to accumulate 55 trillion excuses.




Bwwaaahahaha
Seriously, anyone who takes Kudlow seriously is sorely mistaken. If the economy has been so great, why have public, private, and commercial debt all increased significantly? I'll tell you why...what has fueled any of the economic growth we've had over the past few years has been debt. But instead of going into productive assets, it went into crap like unnecessarily large homes, consumer goods, and entertainment. And before anyone criticizes me for daring to question the value judgments of Americans, well, that's just what people on this site do as a matter of course.

People criticizing Truthseeker sound like Barbra Streisand when she questioned how Bush could win because everyone she knew voted for the other guy.

I would add, too, that whether the economy is doing this or that depends on what numbers you look at. Inflation and employment figures are so perverted at this point, who can say what is real? Some economists think we are actually in a recession right now, based on calculations performed the way they were performed 15 years ago.

Mencken backwards as usual
It is actually Truthseeker who sounds like Babs not understanding how Bush won (actually, it was a Manhattan socialite who couldn't understand how Reagan won, but we'll let that one pass--Streisand is certainly stupid enough to repeat the error) He figures that if times are tough for him, then the economy must be bad.

The fact is that liberals are simply incapable of admitting that the Bush marginal rate and capital gains cuts have had the exact effect predicted by the Laffer Curve, just as they did for Reagan and Kennedy previously. In addition to the 4% GDP growth, low unemployment and low inflation cited by Kudlow, leading indicators, including capital investment, IT investment, inventories and productivity are all extremely strong. But to admit that the Laffer Curve works would destroy a major pillar of the Church of Liberalism, i.e. that higher taxes produce economic growth. Perhaps Mencken can name some of these noted economists who say we are in recession (other than Krugman, who has been caught in so many lies, falsehoods and retractions that he has become a running joke)

And "Professor" Mulla, he of the alleged PHD and MBA, serves up the profound gem that the economy can't really be good because "the war soldiers are tired in Iraq and other places." I suppose that if they were well-rested, GDP would really take off.

How ironic that the libs describe themselves as the "fact-based" party, when in truth they spend much of their time denying facts to preserve their illusions. Face up to it, boys--Keynes is dead--Friedman and Laffer rule!

Keynes
First off, John Galt, why do you always throw around labels like "liberal" about people you disagree with? There are plenty of conservatives who disagree with you, and plenty of liberals who agree with you.

Secondly, Keynes is alive and well. In a sense, supply-siders, who subscribe to religion as much as anyone, are the ultimate Keynesians. Cut taxes, flood the economy with some extra stimulus, and bingo, you have what seems like healthy economic growth. I say "seems like", because I think it's a really dubious to call our economic situation "healthy". If our debt wasn't continuing to mount exponentially, and our overall trade deficit wasn't continuing to expand, maybe I could agree with you.

I guess the better question is: Why do you think it's o.k. to saddle future Americans with a lower standard of living in order for everyone to have their bread and circuses today?

Bushspeak
It's not what Bush says, it's the way he says it. He has absolutely no speaking skills whatsoever. Every time I watch his oratory I more or less ignore what he's saying and anticipate his next screw up in grammar. The only reason Clinton lasted as a President and had a second term was his speaking ability. True, most of what he said was totally false and deceitful, but most liberals are incapable of determining truth from fiction. Let's elect someone with decipherable speech patterns like George Allen. McCain's a nut case who sounds like Mickey Mouse.

Statistics
Just an f.y.i., there have been many adjustments to government statistics keeping over the last 10-20 years. One of the big ones is the use of hedonistic (they might actually be called "hedonic", I can't recall at the moment) adjustments for inflation figures. Or owner's equivalent rent, which has discounted the rise in home prices. I'd explain these concepts, but I doubt you'd be interested.

One guy who tracks all this stuff runs a pretty comprehensive website: The well-regarded http://www.shadowstats.com.


let's play to the higher denominator
Life is good- and I'm paycheck to paycheck like most.
Here's what I'm NOT hearing:
Lets figure out a way to fill these millions of hi-paying jobs that an educated public could apply.(don't believe me, look at a website of a hi-tech company and click on career opportunities)
The "poor" have more programs than excuses-lets change the emphasis to a denominator higher than fry-cook.

TAKE A LOOK INTO THE MIRROR...
...and you will see the reason why you didn't keep up with the rest of America; the Jonses or the Garcias....Now spare us the non-stop whinning and complaining and take a few courses at your local community college. Become a professional, white-collar salaried, employee or self-employed professional and elevate yourself from the bottom-feeder ranks of the union, blue-collar, hourly wage earners. Step out of the coal mine and place yourself into the oval office. Put that shovel down and pick up a book.

The view never changes for the #2-sled dog. Ask old Fido, he's always the victim.

Response to Mencken
Why do I throw around terms like "liberal?" Because I enjoy it! If you can't put a thumb in the collective liberal eye on a site like this, then what use is it? It is true that there are many points of disagreement under the conservative tent--I refer you to Jonah Goldberg for in-depth discussion of Fiscal Cons, Social Cons, Paleocons, Neocons (a little-understood and much misused label if ever there was one), Crunchy cons, etc. I see much less intellectual disagreement among liberals--they may not be monolithic, but I don't believe that I mischaracterize their positions as a whole, even if you may disagree with my conclusions about those positions.

Regarding Keynes--I believe that Keynesianism has been roundly defeated by the Chicago school among cutting edge economists. Although my U. of Michigan econ profs revered Keynes only slightly less than Marx, I have parted ways with him as well. Keynes argued for increased taxation and government spending to combat recession; Bush has split the difference--cutting taxes and increasing spending. However, increased spending had no effect on the recession in his first term. Neither did his ill-advised tax rebates, which relied on the flawed theory that tax cuts work by putting money in people's hands to spend. It was the cuts in marginal rates and capital gains taxes and the subsequent boom in investment and entrepreneurship they spurred that led to the stong recovery we see today.

Regarding inflation--I have seen arguments that inflation is understated due to lack of inclusion of fuel prices, housing, automobiles, etc. However, this was true during the Clinton administration as well, when the liberal MSM was falling all over itself to trumpet the "miracle economy." Nobody in those days was trying to argue that we were actually in a recession. Also, if inflation is understated, unemployment is overstated. Most reported numbers rely on the employers survey, which leaves out small business owners and self-employed, which are to a large extent driving the current boom.

Regarding deficits--I agree that we are over-spending. However, the tax cuts have already led to decreasing federal deficits. Now, if we can only replace RHINOS with real conservatives, and get a fillibuster-proof majority, we will be able to curb spending and address ballooning entitlement spending. Trade and current account deficits are meaningless in the long run. If you are old enough to remember the mid-80's, you will be shocked to notice that we haven't been "taken over" by the Germans and Japanese as was predicted then.

Kudlow
Kudlow is brilliant, and knows more about economics than any of the whining, "life's unfair," Republicans (read: conservatives) are mean crowd. If this were Hillary's economy, you would be reading good news every day. How else did her husband survive with 65% job approval ratings while he was being serviced in the White House? The economy is fantastic, and it is because of Bush's capital gains and other tax cuts, and despite September 11 and the mess Clinton left. God Bless America and the free market economy.

JohnGalt foils Mencken....
Menc-
... pull out those Krugman stats...you know you wanna...

Neither party can turn us around
truthseeker writes:

are we living in the same world? few are going to buy the bull crap you are attempting to sell, except for a few elete the rest of us are working more and having less disposable income then we did before this joker and his crew hijacked this country. thanks to ignoring an invasion of illegals wages are being held down while the falling american dollar means just about everything has risen in price.---inyrest returns are almost non existant and dividends are a joke.

Truthseeker:

You are living in the same world but what we are living in is the result of 70 years of decline into socialism and while what Bush did regarding tax cuts kept us from disaster, it won’t keep us from disaster forever.

Unless we use the reform like Ireland did which took them from welfare nation with 120% national debt to GDP, worker’s wages at ½ our ave, mfg. Wage, and 15% unemployment, to 2nd wealthiest in Europe, 27% national debt, wages $1.30 higher than ours, and 4.3% unemployment, sooner or later we will be a “welfare nation” too.

How did they do it? The labor party and the conservative party agreed to cut taxes on the wealthy, investment and business corporate income. They realized the myth of “giving the top 2% a tax break” was only making the workers suffer because he top 2% could invest in tax free investments, invest overseas or even move. They went from a tax on corporate income that was higher than our average Fed and State rate of 42% (we are the top or near top tax nation in the industrialized world now) to 30 pts lower at 12.5% and their tax revenues soared as business moved to Ireland.

It cause the French, who socialist democrats worship for socialism to complain to the European Union about the millionaires moving out of France, the businesses moving out of France, and the tax revenues leaving, and demand the EU make Ireland stop being so “unfair” with their low taxes.

Neither party is able to do what is needed because the democrats block the type of tax reform needed to turn things around for business which results in turning around things for workers.

Regarding the open borders, democrats want that even worse than Republicans because they want to immigrate 100 to 200 million to save social security by keep workers to retirees at 3 to 1 when the 77 million baby boomers retire and draw from social security and Medicare for what is now expected to average 35 years for people under 65 now.

We have an 84 trillion unfounded liability in those two programs alone. We also expect to add millions of jobs and we don’t have the workers now and certainly not when the 77 million retire, that we need to fund those programs. Also, like it or not, we can’t compete in the world market with higher wages for a couple of reasons. One is that 35% of the prices we pay are hidden taxes and higher wages just makes us worse than the tax by itself would do.

Those nations also have lower healthcare costs, lower payroll taxes, lower raw materials costs in some cases, lower litigation expense, and lower compliance costs. All of these things are due to socialism and both parties unable or unwilling to buck the voters who want socialism thinking it is not costing them. They don’t know they pay for it in prices.

Look a Ireland again. A business here wanting a $50,000 after tax profit has to mark up the price to $87,000 just to cover the income tax. The Irish business only has to mark ti up to $57,000 to get the same after tax profit. That is why Ireland is able to compete in the world market and we can’t among other things like compliance costs.

Any real reform is blocked either by democrats and the filibuster or an ad campaign that gets voters upset thinking “The top 2%” are getting a break when all that does is hurt workers in the long run. Even Kerry only had to pay 12% by investing in tax free securities and all wealth can either be invested like he did, or moved overseas or the wealthy themselves leave and take the jobs with them.

The tax cuts we cut encouraged spending alright. Mostly the cuts were spent by consumers on more Chinese items because American consumers aren’t going to buy things with 35% tax in them when they can buy the same thing made in China without the 35% hidden tax. The low interest rates encouraged a housing boom and 42% of job growth was tied to that and now that interest rates are rising, that housing boom is dead. Much of the economic growth was due to people spending equity and buying new homes thus helping manufacturing of building materials, construction companies and financial companies.

Tax revenues have soared because of corporate profits, but for how long? Because we didn’t cut taxes where they should have been cut, this “recovery” could disappear. This isn’t because what we did didn’t help but because it isn’t enough and it isn’t in the right places. You can’t cut taxes on workers. The more you raise taxes on business and the wealthy, the more the workers have to pay in hidden taxes. There is no way to avoid that and keep business here when other countries are offering better deals.

Socialism has never worked and never will. Socialism, by the way, doesn’t mean not having social programs, just not having them at the most ineffective and inefficient level of government, the federal level. The nations in rapid growth are just about all “ex-socialist” nations that have gone to capitalism and tax reform to turn their nations around. In virtually every case they have cut taxes on business, investment and the wealthy and yet the workers are getting higher wages and a higher standard of living as the reforms take hold.

China, now has more middle class than our population and only $8,000 is needed to be middle class because they have 4 to 5 times the buying power. They have personal social security accounts, personal health savings accounts supplemented by government and business contributions. They have rising wages, a home buying boom, new cities of 1 million being built on farm land with factories, subdivisions, skyscraper office buildings, high rise apartments, new highways, rail lines and 40 nuclear power plants to meet the demand of all the businesses leaving not only high tax nations like the U.S. but German, France, Scandinavia, Canada, England, etc.

That isn’t to promote a totalitarian nation, because that is what China is, but to show why we are losing our standard of living because we have a population and Congress that refuses to compete in taxes and business policy. Mid size businesses spend 400% to 700% more in compliance costs for taxes than the actual tax they pay. And the consumer pays both the compliance cost and the tax.

Quote:
Most Americans complain that taxes are taking a larger bite out of their incomes than ever before. During the month of April, tax-filing time, they complain most bitterly.
This study calculates how much additional money middle- income workers must earn to purchase various goods and ser vices--a new car, a computer, or a year's college tuition for their children--after all taxes are fully taken into account. For instance, a wage earner in an average-tax state must earn $17,038 to purchase a $10,000 car. That means that the work er pays $7,038 in income, payroll, and sales taxes on a $10,000 car. The study finds that in some high-tax states, such as California and New York, the "true" price to consum ers of goods and services is twice the retail price because of taxes. Self-employed workers, who must pay a self-employment tax, routinely must also earn double the retail price of an item to have the after-tax income to buy it. That is the "rule of two on taxes."
http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp-015.html
======================
You live in the same world as the “Bush” people but that world isn’t going nearly far enough to really turn this nation around.

And if Democrats get in, the open border will be just as bad but it will be with legal immigrants flooding the workforce if the border is secured. Just read the Bills the democrats are fighting for and see how many workers they want immigrated. Only a few in either party like Sessions and Tancredo are fighting this effort to bring 100-200 million immigrants in. Yet, if they don’t, how do we keep the ratio of workers to retirees at 3 to 1 or better for 35 years.

Those who criticize the Republicans for spending have to remember that most that is proposed by democrats will cost as much if not more. They may have a slightly different plan but it will be just as expensive. Their solution, though, is to cut spending on defense to pay for it which is ridiculous. We did that before WWII and it cost us two years of losses to Japan before our military was strong enough to win battles.

Also, if workers wages go up, (another dirty Washington secret both parties have some blame in), wage inflation will drive up COLA increases on entitlements. Thus, inflation is distorted to be lower than we, as workers, know it is, to keep mandatory spending down as much as possible. How much is that costing us? Look at the 2007 budget.

Quote:
Department of Health and Human Services $697 Billion 60% Growth since 2001
Department of the Treasury $495,Billion 27.8 % Growth since 2001
Social Security Administration $625 Billion 32.3 % Growth since 2001



$261 billion growth
$107 billion growth
$152 billion growth
========================
http://www.freedomworks.org/budget/

While our political parties deserve a lot of blame, it is the voters who are ignorant and asking for things that make it worse, not better for workers in the long run. Until we do what old socialist nations are doing, we are doomed and neither party is going to pull us out of it.

Foil
I don't think anything I've said has really been disproved. That's because it's mostly a difference in values. I value a sustainable economy that I can pass on to my children. Others don't seem to mind that our children will be paying for our high standard of living.

Fair tax?
Robin writes

Bring on the fair tax. Yes, I would like that but you will have trouble with voters who think a 30% sales tax is ripping them off inspite of of lower prices, rebates and more exports increasing jobs and wages. That kind of tax reform will be filibusted if they can because it would put socialism's grip on the nation at risk and the socialist leadership of the democratic party isn't going to go without a fight on that.

Notice, I do not say democrats. Most democrats might even support it but democrats aren't in control of their party any more. Secular humanists, socialists, and anti-capitalists are in control. They won't look at the ex-socialist nations that are using tax reform for examples. They are stuck on stupid because socialism has never worked and never will.

Blue Collar -> White Collar progression
I have been saying for a few years now that the eventual elites are going to be the low-tech people. The ones that get paid by the hour to clean toilets, provide plumbing, remove trash and a host of other low-end degrading hourly jobs.

My hypothesis is simple (as they usually are since I am actually one of those hourly service providers). Once the entire American populace has shifted the employment horizon to be based solely on White Collar salaried professionalism, there will be an increasing demand for unskilled, and/or trade labor. The market is saturated with would-be Web Designers, IT specialists, Consultants and Physicians. The employment advertisements are also filled to overflowing with companies trying to hire plumbers, electricians, masons and drywallers. You know, those heinous hourly wage-earning “jobs”. No one actually wants to do these jobs due to the social stigma attached to them, so what we get are the transitory workers just using this as a springboard to the elusive White Collar Profession, or the immigrant worker happy to have some kind of gainful employment. Our construction and service industry is now devoid of the true craftsman who takes pride in his work being replaced with lazy time-servers, sleep bereft night-schoolers, and immigrants of questionable legitimacy.

Take a look at any construction site you get a chance to drive by on the way to your glass tower and pay a little attention to the people laying down the brickwork, pouring the concrete and placing the drywall. It is a good chance they will be little brown-skinned fellows all mysteriously named Ernesto.

Although this may in effect look like a rant against Hank, I need to point out that in an end-around my culminating theory actually agrees with him.

Our Democratic Left is currently bearing pressure on the non-union private employer Wal-Mart to up their pay scale for their employees to a livable standard with FREE health care. This heavy-handed assault is being initiated by big labor. (according to the thread I read a few minutes ago here) Big Labor in concert with the Democratic party feels that every broom-pusher and cashier should make at least $30.00 and hour (like they do in public schools) to equalize the standard of living for all Americans. Unfortunately, that idea is directly responsible for why everything that “can” be made in the United States is now made in China. It also plays directly into Hank’s assertion that if you aren’t happy with where you are in life, get off your dead a$$ and do something to improve it. Liberalism makes it easy to be a time-server because you can make as much as a doctor for being a dead-beat, so why try to improve yourself?

The real shot in the butt, is that we can’t afford triple-digit income janitors, nor should we have to. Our Socialist-biased government wants us to believe it is our right to have the same things as a doctor or lawyer but with half the effort. What our society is left with is a bunch of people pre-programmed to believe they are worth more than they are paid and several million annual immigrants willing to be paid what the job is worth.

Foil
I don't think anything I've said has really been disproved. That's because it's mostly a difference in values. I value a sustainable economy that I can pass on to my children. Others don't seem to mind that our children will be paying for our high standard of living.

Eonomy is fine..
it's just that socialists (liberals) don't know how to live within a budget (unless they're part of the liberal elite). They seem to think that necessities should be an entitlement so that all their income can be used for luxuries. Health insurance a problem? If people abused auto or home insurance as they do health insurance, no one could afford to drive or buy a home. Why is it that while libs are pro-death (PC = pro-choice (LOL)) do they have such a great fear of death when it is inevitable?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.