Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, April 05, 2009
Kevin McCullough :: Townhall.com Columnist
Why Risk Threatens Obama
by Kevin McCullough
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


But it is resolutely true that without many risk takers undergoing the lumps in their throats, the sinking in the pit of their stomachs, and the massive sacrifice of much--the American economy would have dried up long ago.

The problems with Obama's entire approach to economic development is that he replaces risk with status quo, limited outcomes, and static conditions for all.

For what it’s worth, static conditions do exactly the opposite of risk.

I was with a CEO of a company in Virginia (several actually) last weekend and the thing he blurted out in the middle of breakfast was, "When conditions are bad get your arms around the cash."

In other words, hold on to resources, become miserly, take less risk, and attempt less or even no growth. When risk is looked at as suspect, success is punished as criminal, and taxes force the productive to no longer be motivated to achieve more, things grind to a painfully ugly halt. And that's exactly where we find ourselves in 2009.

Elastic economies create, produce, thrive, and teach lessons. Static ones stunt, inhibit, block, and eventually shut down.

Jobs are not created in a vacuum. If there is no benefit to the corporation hiring them, then they should not be given a job, plain and simple. No one has a Constitutional right to a job.

But everyone should be given the same chance at success or failure, risk or reward, responsibility or consequence.

President Obama has chosen instead to spend money we haven't yet printed. He also insists on creating jobs that serve no economic purpose in "greening" the most environmentally conscious nation on earth. On top of that he stifles the risk-takers from creating new products, developing growth, or starting businesses. And that money he's photocopying in the basement of the White House, when it is printed, will be nearly worthless because of the lack of securities behind it.

So to sum up...

Obama is shrinking the pie, AND simultaneously filling it with devalued currency.

Doing so alone would be harmful enough, but doing so while suffocating the breath out of the only elements of the economy that could allow us to recover (elastic risk) verges on arrogant, maniacal, or criminal.

I'll let you decide which you believe it to be.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kevin McCullough is the nationally syndicated host of "'Xtreme' Radio and columnist based in New York. He blogs at www.muscleheadrevolution.com. His second book "The Kind Of MAN Every Man SHOULD Be" is in stores now.

Be the first to read Kevin McCullough's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Doc D - Really?
"McCullough uses this odd "elasticity" concept for describing supposedly healthy economies, which somehow promotes more risk taking. I'll admit I'm no economist"

This is where you should have stopped, done a quick Wikki search and then proceeded.

Price elasticity is the measure of the change in demand for a good or service that results from a change in price. Price goes up, demand goes down and the contrary is also true. Now in the context of this article, risk is tax. Higher taxes, just like higher risk, make it less likely that an economic activity will result in the necessary return required to induce individuals to engage in that activity. More simply stated, risk-reward. Why would someone, anyone, assume risk without reward, pecuniary or otherwise?

Now I am new here, but I am not new to the planet, so Dr D, please in the future do not respond without first doing a minimum level research or giving a minimum level of thought to your responses.

Thank you in advance.

Denise:
I agree with all of this. But ...

We also executed child molesters when they were caught. If not when caught, then later after they were tried and convicted. Now it isn't possible. We are depriving them of their 'rights'.

We didn't have the government adding things to our house water coming from the hose.

We didn't have to worry about being sued if a kid slipping on our grass and scraped his knee.

We didn't have the government mandating how to raise a child.

I don't really think we've progressed much. If anything, we've gone backward.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.