Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, August 26, 2007
Kevin McCullough :: Townhall.com Columnist
Why Liberals Always Protect Perverts
by Kevin McCullough
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Liberal radio talk show host Ron Kuby mocked Vallone for drafting the legislation. Kuby is also a slip-and-fall/criminal defense attorney. With great bravado Kuby bullied the councilman in the few minutes they had on-air together, and then went on to brag about all the money he would win from clients for the misapplication he potentially sees from such a law being passed.

Donna Liebermann the NYCLU's executive director (and reportedly a female) added her own sentiments saying, "The problem with this legislation is that it’s trying to get at this amorphous, vague behavior of looking, which is very imprecise. The language of the bill reflects how vague the activity that they’re trying to get at is, and the problem is that it’s an invitation to abuse, to selective enforcement based on the whims or prejudice of the individual police officer." Adding, "What kind of a look is degrading, and therefore unlawful, who's to say?"

Well Donna, any woman who's ever been the slightest bit attractive could tell you.

They get degrading looks, mental undressings, and even unwanted physical contact from creeps in society daily.

It's only "imprecise" if no one desires justice or decency for the privacy of women and children. And it is impossible for it to be an invitation to abuse if men have their heads faced forward, and would perhaps bother to look women in the eyes. (Maybe Donna shops in New Jersey.)

So while liberals pledge to get rich while killing this bill, and labeling it "creepy lawmaking," they have given us a supreme glimpse - a window to their soul if you will...

Liberals will profit mightily by giving aid to perverts, pandering to peeping toms, and giving sanctuary to 31 count indictees of child rape/executioners.

They will do this as opposed to protecting the privacy of their own girlfriend, fiancé, wife, mother, or daughters.

And when necessary they will even brainwash women to make the case for them.

So which is more "creepy" - banning the perverts or defending them?

Have we really arrived at the day in which we have to ask such questions?

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kevin McCullough is the nationally syndicated host of "'Xtreme' Radio and columnist based in New York. He blogs at www.muscleheadrevolution.com. His second book "The Kind Of MAN Every Man SHOULD Be" is in stores now.

Be the first to read Kevin McCullough's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Democraps and grace
Democraps can't fall from grace, since they don't have any. There's a big difference between individuals' personal failings and a whole party dedicated to gaining power and votes by encouraging victim-centric, values-neutral parasitic lifestyles. Clinton didn't have the good sense to preserve the dignity of the office of the Presidency and step down. Gerry Studds, anyone? No one around here needs a lecture from lame-o socialist rebels-without-a-clue. You should be whining over at daily kos.

what about cheerleaders?
Item: The Clinton justice department
under liberal Janet Reno, prosecuted a man
in State College Pennsylvania, named Knox, for child pornography for zooming in on the panties of cheerleaders at football games while the girls were doing their routines such as twirling like a figure skater and also while kicking their legs high in the air.

The girls were dressed in what both they and their parents (and society) considered socially acceptable and decent attire- knowing full well that anyone sitting in the bleachers ABOVE the girls could easily see

So, why was it considered "child pornography" by the LIBERAL Mr. Patrick for Mr. Knox to videotape what these girls and their parents and cheerleading coaches clearly wanted (or at least acquiesced for) everyone in a public place (football stadium) to to be able to see-the skirts and panties. Yet, the girls parents became enraged.

Was that a Thought crime? Possibly...Because the parents and Mr Patrick were simply angry because the pathetic Mr. Knox was obviously taking pleasure from viewing something that a normal decent person would not find particularly pleasurable and which is routinely seen in public.

So the Liberal Deval Patrick, of the Liberal Bill Clinton's administration, did NOT protect this "pervert".

The Knox case blows your crazy hypothesis out of the water. The truth is there are just as many liberal prudes like Reno and Patrick who are equally obsessed with "perverts".

I agree the guy under the train tracks needs to be arrested for lurking in a special area to invade privacy. However, in public, we also have to assume some responsibility for our attire-particularly when wearing a short skirt. And the proposed remedial legislation goes way too far. I am really sorry that Ihave to agree with the Christmas hating aclu on anything.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.