Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, February 08, 2009
Ken Connor :: Townhall.com Columnist
Old Age Ain't for Sissies
by Ken Connor
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


"Rise in the presence of the aged, show respect for the elderly and revere your God. I am the LORD." -Leviticus 19:32 NIV

Old age ain't for sissies—especially if you happen to be living in one of America's 15,000 nursing homes.

While there are some fine facilities for the long term care of the elderly, many nursing homes have become dangerous places for the residents who live there. I know because I have seen their suffering up close and personal. As a trial lawyer, I represent many victims of abuse and neglect in nursing homes and assisted living facilities across the country.

But you don't have to take my word for it.

A recent Department of Health and Human Services report found that 94% of America's nursing homes have been cited for violating federal health and safety standards. Perhaps even more disturbing, however, is a study by Consumer Reports that found that state regulators fined only 50% of nursing homes whose misconduct warranted fines.

Pressure ulcers (bed sores) are all too common among the elderly in nursing homes. They develop as a result of leaving a resident in one position for too long without turning or repositioning them. Pressure from a mattress or chair on a bony prominence deprives the resident's tissue of blood flow and the skin breaks down. While "bed sores" sound benign, they are not. I have seen countless pressure ulcers that penetrate to the bone. They are gaping wounds that are often infected and foul smelling as a result of contamination with urine and feces. They develop because short-handed staff frequently don't have enough time to turn or reposition residents, or even to clean them up after they have soiled themselves. Malnutrition is estimated to plague up to 65% of nursing home residents and countless others suffer from avoidable dehydration—all because harried staff don't have time to assist with feeding or to provide fluids to thirsty residents. Still others suffer broken bones resulting from falls and the lack of supervision. Often this occurs when the resident's call light isn't responded to in a timely fashion and the resident attempts to get to the bathroom without assistance in order to avoid soiling themselves.

Make no mistake about it—pressure sores, malnutrition, dehydration, and falls in nursing homes are not the inevitable consequence of old age and ill health. They are, all too often, the result of understaffing of nursing homes and the resulting inability of the staff on hand to provide the care their residents need and deserve. Shockingly, government studies show that more than half of nursing homes fall below the "minimum" staffing standard proposed by the Health Care Financing Administration (n/k/a the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) of two hours of care each day from certified nursing assistants, and nine out of ten homes fall below the HCFA "optimal" standard of 2.9 hours of care each day from certified nursing assistants. Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley rightly observed, "More than half the nation's nursing homes don't meet a minimum benchmark for staffing. That means residents don't get fed enough. They don't get turned to prevent bedsores. They end up in the hospital much more often than they should."

But why wouldn't nursing homes provide adequate staffing to take care of their frail elderly residents? Two words: "corporate greed", the same two words that are at the root of our current economic meltdown. You see, the largest expense of a nursing home's budget is "labor." Nursing home executives have learned that one surefire way to increase the profitability of their homes is to reduce costs by "shorting" the staff. That pumps up the bottom line. In the process, however, residents who depend on the staff for their basic needs are shortchanged.

One example from the New York Times is informative: Habana Health Care Center was taken over by private investment firms in 2002. The firms immediately cut the staff, reducing the number of registered nurses (RNs) by 50%. Budgets for care were slashed. Fifteen residents died and their families sued the home for negligent care. Regulators warned the home time and again, but received no response. These procedures are commonplace. Sixty percent of homes which have been bought out by private investment firms in recent years have cut their number of RNs, sometimes to illegal levels.

The offending nursing homes often try to conceal their perfidy by falsifying patients' charts. In an attempt to deceive state inspectors about the level of care being delivered, nursing homes frequently host "charting parties" where staff will hastily fill in blanks in patients' charts. The result is that they often chart care as having been given on non-existent days (February 31), or after the resident is dead, or, perhaps, before the resident was even admitted to the facility. Sometimes, they will chart care as having been given despite the fact that the identified care giver wasn't at work (a review of the employee time cards reveals this fraud). Such actions no doubt account for John T. Bentivoglio's statement in the Washington Post on February 4, 2000 that, "A number of high flying nursing home chains appear to have incorporated defrauding Medicare as part of their business strategy." At the time he made that statement, Mr. Bentivoglio served as Special Counsel for Health Care Fraud at the Justice Department. His statement is no less true today than when he first uttered it.

Lamentably, there is little media coverage of elder abuse. Perhaps that's because much of it goes on behind the closed doors of nursing homes. Perhaps it's because our culture is obsessed with youth and no one wants to contemplate getting old. Or perhaps it's because we simply devalue the elderly—after all, many of them have substantially degraded mental and physical abilities. For whatever reason, no one seems to pay much attention to elder abuse these days.

The Ethics and Public Policy Center is a rare exception. It recently acknowledged that elder abuse is on the rise: "According to a National Center on Elder Abuse survey, more than 565,000 cases of suspected elder abuse were reported in 2003—an increase of nearly 20 percent from 2000." But, mark it down: things are only going to get worse. The perfect storm is brewing. A massive age wave has begun. The over-65 population will more than double between 2010 to 2040. The leading edge of the Baby Boomers is approaching retirement age. Huge numbers of Boomers will need nursing home care. They will overwhelm existing capacity, and they will do so at a time when America's old age entitlement programs are on the verge of collapse. In 2017, Social Security's cash flow is projected to go negative, and in 2019 Medicare is slated to go broke. Meanwhile, our national consensus has shifted from a sanctity of life ethic to a quality of life ethic. The elderly suffering the ravages of time—strokes, dementia, disability—do not score well using quality of life calculus. It will become easier to view them as "disposable" when they cost more to maintain than they produce.

Americans need to wake up to the implications of what it means to become a mass geriatric society. Individuals need to prepare now for the years when they will live in decline. Families must prepare to assume a greater role in caring for their aging loved ones. The church must acknowledge that the elderly are part of the "least among us" and reach out to lend a helping hand. Government needs to get its head out of the sand and prepare for a crisis that will make Hurricane Katrina look like a walk in the park. And the nursing home industry must mend its ways and be held fully accountable whenever it abuses, neglects or exploits those it has agreed to care for.

We all have a stake in averting this crisis. Only the dead don't grow old.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ken Connor is Chairman of the Center for a Just Society in Washington, DC.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Great Column...

Mr. Connor,

I pray that neither my wife nor I ever need one of these facilities.

I would much rather go quickly, than die a slow torture of neglect.



Abort the elderly

Using the same criteria and legal justifications to abort fetuses, we will soon be able to abort the elderly when they become inconventent to their children who have to support them.

It will be interesting
for sure to watch what happens under ObamanibleCare. Will there even BE care facilities?

Nursing home neglect
Thank you, Mr. Connor.

Children Must Step Up
As lots of you know, my Daddy died in October 2008 and we have had to find Mama a place in senior living. Fortunately she has found one that is good for now, and equally fortunately two of my sisters and two neices live nearby and are able to supervise and look after her when she needs them.

In former times it was the duty of children to look after their parents when they reached the point in life where they needed care. Many of us still do that willingly. Far too many simply dump their parents and then wait anxiously for the outcome of the race between their money and their lives. Will Mama die before her money runs out? Will she *cheat us our of Our Inheritance* by living too long? That is what most concerns Generation Whine, it seems. Well, that and the fact that their GrabbyBaby offspring continue to live in their basement and spend their days playing Warcraft and watching videos while waiting for TheRightJob to come knocking on their bedroom doors.

I am just about to turn 61 and my health is beginning to concern me, and the subject of caring for myself when the time comes is at the top of my list. Believe me, this is serious stuff.

Family Members Must Step In
Unfortunately I have seen first hand what AduR10 says about generation Whine. My mother is in a nursing home in upstate NY. My sister and I are there almost daily, and visit and different times of the day and different days of the week. We see first hand what happens to patients who seldom have visitors. They are the last to be helped because they know that the chances of a family member visiting are slim.

Our hands are tied when we try to assist others at meal time because state law forbids us from assisting non-family members with their meals. As a result many sit and wait while their food gets colds and do not get fed the entire portions because the CNA has 5 more people to feed within a certain time frame.

Care for the elderly in my mother's facility is inconsistent and the quality depends on who is on duty and how often the patient receives visitors. I feel sorry for those who family members turn a blind eye and weep because another month has arrived when they must write a check from their parent's account.

Thanks for the great article and the opportunity to vent.





What You Didn't Mention
Interesting that you say "corporate greed" but nothing about the "loving" children that transfer the aged assets to themselves so Medicaid will pay the nursing home bill. Maybe you ought to investigate that fraud. Maybe you ought to look into how much Medicaid pays and ask why anyone with integrity would own a nursing home. Maybe you ought to look at the fundamental breakdown of society that allows our wonderful citizens to throw their parents care to the tax payer. I know of many in my generation who take their parents in and get home care if needed but I also know many that just take their funds and put them in under Medicaid.

Government is partly to blame
I've worked as an RN in a nursing home. My son currently works in one. My mom is in a nursing home. I agree that there is abuse in nursing homes and that family involvement is needed. However, some of the numbers cited are misleading and some of the injuries are caused by ridiculous regulations.

Regarding the numbers. Mr. Connor cites that 94% of the nursing homes have been cited for infractions. I'm sure that's true. But it would be more accurate to mention the types of infractions. State/federal surveys categorize infractions into "seminal" events, such as resident falls or medication errors and other types of infractions, such as ones involving policy (while working in a nursing home I wrote and implemented a dynamite policy for infection control but the home was cited in the next survey because we'd overlooked removing the word "draft" from the document).

Regarding the injuries. Many State and Federal regs may actually increase a resident's risk. The first that comes to mind is about restraints. Of course, no one wants to see our seniors tied down, but regs have gone overboard. Nsg homes can't use bedrails, recliners, or anything else that keeps a resident from falling because it's considered restraining them. When homes reacted by putting mattresses on the floor (figuring that at least there wouldn't be as far to fall) they were cited for infringing on the senior's dignity. When homes started using tab alarms (a sound would play if a residents got out of their chairs) the state decided these were restraints since they inhibited the senior from standing up.

There are lots of other examples. Again, I agree that we need to take better care of our seniors but this article feels like fear mongering. And that never helps.

Government solution
I wouldn't worry that this will be a long term problem. As Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid funds dry up, our Marxist CinC will simply declare the elderly not (sufficiently) human, as the left has done with infants, thereby allowing the state to "abort" them at its convenience. Think it can't happen? It already is.

Oregon lady
Sad but true.If the people involved in those cases were actually hauled into court,stripped of all their profits and sent to jail for abuse of the elderly it would correct a few of the problems

CHOOSING THE MEANS OF ONES DEATH

.....Many years ago I watched an episode of Gunsmoke that touched on this issue ...

.....A gunfighter (dying from TB) came to town looking for a showdown with Marshall Dillon ...

.....The two men faced off in the street and the gunfighter fell mortally wounded ...Dillon came to the dying man and asked, "You had me beat, why didn't you pull the trigger?"

....."I did", replied the gunfighter ...

.....Dillon took the man's gun and examined the cylinder. It was empty. "Why", he asked? ...

....."A fitting end for a gunfighter, don't you think Marshall? Far better than hacking up my lungs in a Sanatorium". ...

.....I have already informed my children that I do not intend to end my days in a nursing home ...I want to be carried out on my shield .....COLOSSUS

The other side
I'm 60mplus years old and have been around nursing care facilities for at least 40 years. Most of the time, the resident, rarely if ever sees family. If family would just show up on non-shedualed times and visit their loved ones (wonder if that is true), they could stop much of the neglect.

I can remeber a lady at one facility that was there for more than 20 years and her only living family member, a doctor, visited three times. Sadly when she died the administrator's husband had her buried because the brother would not. He wanted the state to do it for him.

The "Nanny State" has taken the place of family resposibility. What family once did the church went on to doi. What the church once dis (library's, schools, universities, orphanages, hospitals and much more) the state now does. As the state uses more resources to do it than any other form there will come a day when getting rid of any one past a set age will be premissable.

The love of many has not only waxed cold it has frozen over. The best way to dertermine that is by the way one votes. If you vote to let the state do it (what ever it is) you have a frozen love.

Nursing homes, not all bad.
I work for the agency on aging and am an advocate for the residents in nursing homes. We are working for a culture change and have noticed many good things. I know there are also horrible things going on out there, but you hardly every hear about the good. Sometimes residents do not want to live with their kids, and in that situation, if the family would just visit, that would make all the difference in their lives. and on the other side, some children do not want their parents to live with them. There are projects underway, including the GreenHouse Project and Eden Alternatives. Many nursing homes are trying to make their facilities more like home instead of institutional and it is working miracles. Nursing homes are not prisons, residents have rights, they just haven't been inforced, but times are a changing. I have been in some homes where I would be proud to live. Attitudes are changing, for the better.

Medicare doesn't pay for quality care
I own an Adult Family Home (AFH), basically a small nursing home ran out of my house. We have 3 residents, most AFH are licensed for 6. We only take private pay residents because medicare doesn't pay enough to make it worthwhile. With my 3 residents medicare would pay between 6-7 thousand a month to provide 24 hour a day 7 day a week care. That will not pay my overhead or even come close to providing enough staffing. On top of that every month new regulations are coming down increasing the cost of doing business.
State inspectors have to justify their being on the state payroll. They do that by citing who they inspect. Many of these inspectors will keep digging and digging until they find something to cite a home for. A friend of mine got cited for having spider webs in their garage where medical supplies were stored. I was warned because the baseboard in my house had been scuffed and marked up from wheelchairs rubbing against it. I wasn't cited that time, but if the inspector comes back and sees it you can bet that I will be. Like the inspectors there are teams of regulators who have to justify their jobs so they write more regulations, and every month we get more regulations, more things to add to the cost of doing business, and more reasons for an inspector to cite you.
In the state that I am living in the unions are pushing hard to unionize all my employees. That will only make it harder to get rid of the bad caregivers and replace them with good ones. It will only add to my costs.
threepines you did call it right, far to many families use care facilities as dumping grounds for their parents and grandparents. Families do need to visit more, pay more attention to their elderly members, and at least act like they give a rip about them.

The culture of Death
Nursing home abuse is real and my heart goes out to the elderly who have to spend their "ungolden" years in this facilities.

Our society has been so self-absorbed that the inconvenient truth is many abort their children and want to dump their parents. Self-interest and cold hard cash is more important than the love of life for the unborn and the elderly. It is only going to get worse. I have seen family members try to take care of their parents and almost destroy their own health. No one in the family wants the parents to go to the nursing home but they are not willing to take them in themselves.

A subject close to our hearts. . .
Thank you, Oregon Lady, for your fine input to this problem. And thank you, Mr. Connor, for your most enlightening article.

My wife and I have pretty good long-term care policies, good for nursing home and home health care (it pays a little less than half the rate for home health care). We are saving our policies for the nursing home, or "specialized nursing" as it is called these days.

The 2009 individual daily rate on our policies for nursing home is $183.38 which is about $66,930 per year, and the policies come with 5% annual inflation rider. We got our policies in 1992 when I and my wife were 63 and 60, respectively.

Our current monthly premiums are $116 and $50.70 respectively, or a combined total of about $2000 per year - we have paid about $21,761 in combined premiums so far. The policies cover a 4-year stay in a nursing home based on acturarial odds in 1992 that a person will die within 4 years after entering a nursing home.

Both of us have longevity on our side; our parents and grandparents lived well into their 80's and 90's, and my grandfather died at 102.

We have modified our home for assisted living, like ramps and walk-in shower and grab bars in the bathrooms. (I use a cane or walker, and a power wheelchair.) Although we both have type-2 diabetes and elevated cholesterol and are overweight, and I have other health problems, we are trying to maintain our health so that we can stay in our home for at least another 20-25 years before having to resort to a nursing home.

Just like any other insurance, if we don't use it, we lose it, but if we need it, then we will be glad we have it. I don't know how expensive long-term care insurance is today, but if you can afford it, then by all means buy it when you can before you are too old or are ineligible due to health issues, or the premiums are too high.

residential care homes
I think there is a need for care for the elderly outside of the home that is safe, clean, loving and home-like with regulated medical care givers. Some people do not have children to care for them. Diseases like Alzheimers can take constant supervision and having a sitter can be more dangerous than being in a home because of their lack of regulation.
My Dad is living in a "residential care home" which is a home converted into a care home for the elderly that takes only eight residents at any time. There are two R.N.'s in charge and two medical workers in the home. It is always so clean, never smells, has homemade meals and caring staff. It is like a family in many ways and he is well cared for 24 hours a day. I think this is a trend that should continue to grow. The cost is much less than the large nursing home and the care is better. (at least at the one he is at)

Connor is force-life, not pro-life

Connor said: As a trial lawyer, I represent many victims of abuse and neglect in nursing homes and assisted living facilities across the country.

Connor meant: As a trial lawyer, I represent many who wish to die, and I enjoy their abuse and neglect in nursing homes and assisted living facilities across the country.

Only the dead don't grow old.
Only the lucky don’t grow old.

Let me assure me that visiting a grave is a much more pleasant visit than visiting a prisoner in a bed in a so called home.

The solution: A Kevorkian Room in every so called home, available 24/7. Admission price, a non-”living” body in the bed.

My mother passed her driving test, then a week later was sentenced to a death worse than hanging, for 17 months in a bed. Do you think that she, her children, or her nurses wanted that to happen? No it is a result of intense Brainwashing since birth, and the law that says you suffer as long as we can make you suffer.

And the Connor types enforce that type of non-living.

My sister helped my other sister wallpaper a bedroom, went home fixed supper, went to bed, then on to Heaven.

Which one had the best end of life?

I told my doctor that if I wind up in a hospital of any kind, estimate the number of days I may be there. Multiple those days by the number of pain pills and shots I just might receive, and give them all immediately.

And from his other columns, you know that Connor and his criminal ilk will be there in force to sue everyone involved.

There is more to life than a tube in your mouth.

Let God do it, and remember God don’t use no tubes, no wires, no knives, no machines, and no pills or shots.

If I could think of a pain free, positive manner, I would eat lunch today with my Most Beautiful Sweetie.


Good Health Without Government.
The big secret is out----it takes only 12 months to train a bright high school graduate to be a family doctor. The average wage of a doctor or any worker in the healthcare industry should not be more than twenty dollars an hour. This is a fair wage for a person who should spend only 12 months in training.

The average person imagines that a doctor is some sort of wizard that has magical powers to heal, but this is far from the truth. A doctor was once a student who didn't know the difference between a kitchen knife and a medical scalpel. Expensive and unnecessary years of medical school and a ten dollar stethoscope have created the modern version of the WITCH DOCTOR or MEDICINE MAN. The only magic that these doctors possess is the trick of emptying your bank account. It is not called magic but: "street wisdom".

The whole medical industry including doctors should be tossed to the free market system and be relieved of all government supervision. This idea will cause the biggest backlash since the suggestion that the earth was round instead of flat. The idea that the stethoscope is a magic wand available to only the chosen few is so implanted in the average persons head that it will take a constant bombardment of truth to remove it. The overpaid healthcare industry will spend billions of dollars to prevent deregulation. But they will lose to the fact that healthcare can be affordable.

The outcome of a deregulated healthcare industry will be that the consumer will be king. Word of mouth is the best messenger of top performance. The bright open heart surgeon that learned the trade in twelve months will have many customers when former patients speak highly of the doctor's skill. The cream rises to the top and so will the best doctors. Those that haven't the aptitude will leave the industry when they find that their waiting rooms remain empty.

That's no solution.
Melvin, that was strange. Mr. Conner, you have described the problem, it is a problem we have had for as long as I have been around. What you have described doesn't much resemble what we witnessed with my in laws. It is a tough problem but decent people solve it. I suspect the scope you describe is the result of the money to be made. Medicare (the government) caused the money problem by paying huge amounts for nursing home care. Now everybody has to pay huge amounts whether they get good care or not. Anyplace there is money, organized crime is soon to appear. Organized crime doesn't care about anybody's grandmother any more than the people paid to write the laws to make this work care. One, you could get the money out of it and crime would leave. Two, you could deny the criminal element licenses to practice. Three, States that require nurses and doctors could change that to allow cheaper labor. None of the women or men at my father-in-laws home were nurses or doctors. The doctor came to them. They did not need a nurse, apparently, to take care of the people there. They appeared to be well fed, were kept clean, clothes clean. The key is to have people who will take care of them and not abuse them. That does not describe a nurse, some of whom are avenging angels. There was no way the cost was related to the care, it was related to medicare. Government is run by people who throw money at any problem they do not know how to solve. Heck, everything is run by people who throw money at problems they do not know how to solve. Maybe the solution is to hire people who know how to solve the problems.

You will sign up in the morning, right?

Ken Location: OR
Reply # 1
Date: Feb 8, 2009 - 3:19 PM EST

Maybe the solution is to hire people who know how to solve the problems.

========

The solution: A Kevorkian Room in every so called home, available 24/7. Admission price, a non-”living” body in the bed.

Old Age Ain't For Sissies
Organ Lady wrote that nursing homes are not permitted to use bedrails or alarm buttons on residents. Not only does my husband's nursing home use both, but also locks the wheels on his wheel chair. I have told them repeatedly not to lock the wheels. It is a form of restraint. Of course, I am happy that they use bedrails and alarm buttons. His previous home did not have his alarm button on, the call light was not responded to, and he tried to get out of his chair, fell, split his temple in two places, and received other injuries, one of which is permanent. He ended up in the hospital. No, we did not sure the home.

there are 2 huge problems
with nursing home care. the first is government. the second is parasites like connor. get rid of both, and the situation gets better. keep them both, the situation gets inevitably worse.

jim
please do us all a favor and make good on your desire to see your Most Beautiful Sweetie. I'm sorry but I have a different memory of my Great Grandmother being in the nursing home. She had advocates (My grandmother, great-aunt, my dad, my mom, and all my cousins that were her grandkids and great-grandkids including me) that would show up at a drop of the hat with no warning to see Ma and make sure that she was doing okay. She was in there for about 3 years prior to having her final stroke and going into a coma in 1996 that she never came out of. Point blank, it was not hell...and I would NEVER disrespect her life by saying that it would be easier for us to kill her.

I request that anyone use extraordinary

Tish Location: MD
Reply # 24
Date: Feb 8, 2009 - 8:09 PM EST

and I would NEVER disrespect her life by saying that it would be easier for us to kill her.

=======

Not for a moment would I request that anyone use extraordinary force to help anyone better themselves.

I said, let God do it, and remember God don’t use no tubes, no wires, no knives, no machines, and no pills or shots.

Why isn’t using extraordinary efforts to extend her suffering, just as bad as using extraordinary measures to improve her situation.

And do you mean that when you visit her grave, you think she feels worse than when you visited her suffering existence?

And did you and your family really enjoy the visit to the nursing home, more than the visit to her gravestone.

Look,
This is less about nursing home neglect than about the disintegration of morals in our society.

As God becomes marginalized so does caring.

But God can't get top billing He use to.

To PS Capitalism
RE "If the ability to choose goes away, leaving a system based solely on money, then admittedly...it all goes to hell". Unfortunately, since we do have a system based solely on money and the ability to pay, the system has already gone to hell because "the ability to choose" depends directly on the ability to pay. Elders with plenty of money get good care, and all too often elders with no money or insufficient money get lousy care and are even abused. I believe that the Scandinavian countries do not share our problem. Do you not wonder why?

The problem includes all in our society who are weak (eg, lack money). I picked up a Norwegian movie at a yard sale. I watched it. Here is the plot: a mentally ill man lives with his mother, who takes care of him, then he falls apart when his mother dies. He is briefly hospitalized until he is made stable with medication and counseling, then he is placed in a supervised apartment and helped to adjust to a sheltered job and new relationships. Happy end of story. I kept thinking that in the US this guy would probably have ended up sleeping in the park. A super-capitalist society is fine for those with money, and it is often a nightmare for those without when they are physically or mentally ill, mentally retarded, or OLD.

also...
There just are not the licensed people available to fill empty staff positions. I live in an area with many elderly facilities and the papers are filled with want ads. In fact, in these times of no jobs, the nursing/medical assistant professions are in dire need of workers.
I agree...this is the just the beginning a a moral dilemma for this country. But, a country that allows the killing of the unborn shouldn't have a problem with killing old people.

Part-timers
President Obama stimulus package calls for the hiring of part-time workers at the social care centers of those in need. On the surface that sound noble, but what it is doing is opposing two group of people. Part-time employees have no benefits and could work as little as four hours a day. To the patients in need this will be a burden because at times they will receive care with respect and other times they will be attended by a part-timer without benefits.

health care must be rationed

We need to stop keeping people artificially alive. There is nothing more pitiful than seeing 90 year old people suffering, hooked up to tubes and machines.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.