Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Abortion's Future Rests With the Young
by
Ken Connor
182
Ken Connor's Email
|
Ken Connor
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
View Larger Photo &
More >>
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?
Yes
No
Yes (18 %)
No (82 %)
What is the future of the pro-life movement in our coming post-Republican political world?
With a new President who strongly opposes any restrictions on abortion, how will the next generation of pro-life conservatives respond? No one really has the answer, but most seem to agree that the political dynamic for the pro-life movement is changing. Change is the one constant in politics, so we should not assume that the election of a pro-abortion president spells the death knell for the pro-life agenda.
November's election results, nevertheless, seem to reflect a measure of ambiguity in the pro-life movement. Anti-abortion ballot measures in California and Colorado
failed at the polls
. And even with its strong pro-life population, South Dakota failed to pass an abortion ban for the second time in two years. Is the conservative pro-life movement wavering? Did these measures lose simply because of technicalities? Is the pro-life movement simply not as powerful as it used to be? None of these questions have been answered definitively. One thing is certain, however: the waters surrounding the abortion controversy are cloudy. Change is in the offing, but no one knows what kind of change is coming.
Abortion: An Inherent Good or a Necessary Evil?
As President, Barack Obama will have no small impact on the abortion debate. He is a gifted communicator and
unswervingly supportive
of abortion on demand. Notwithstanding his support for abortion, however, he reluctantly
concedes
, "[N]obody is pro-abortion, abortion is never a good thing." These sentiments match those of a host of abortion advocates who increasingly are ceding ground on the desirability of abortion. These advocates once promoted the procedure as a weightless, consequence-free option to any woman who does not want to be "burdened" by a child. Now, it seems, many in the "pro-choice" movement are at least willing to admit that abortion isn't a "preferred" choice.
This attitude shift is confirmed by recent abortion data. The rate of abortions per-thousand women is at its
lowest point
since the passing of Roe v. Wade in 1973. While the total number of abortions is still depressingly high (1.2 million in 2005), the declining percentage of women having abortions is encouraging.
Young Evangelicals Support Life, But Conflict with Parents over Approach
If polling of young evangelicals is any indication, the decline in abortion rates is likely to continue. A
Pew Forum poll
in 2007 showed that young evangelicals are actually slightly more likely to oppose abortion than their parents: "70% of younger white evangelicals favor 'making it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion,' compared with 55% of older white evangelicals and 39% of young Americans overall who share this view." Moreover,
Pew found
that 66% of the 29-and-under bracket said "ending abortion was very important," compared to 63.9% of those over age 60. Clearly, opposition to abortion among young evangelicals remains strong.
But if young evangelicals are just as opposed to abortion as their parents and grandparents (or even more so), then why is there all this talk about the changing face of evangelical conservatism? The answer is to be found in the political arena. Conservative evangelicals have aligned themselves with Republicans since the birth of the modern "Religious-Right" in the late-'80s, but the new generation of evangelicals appears to be tired of the alliance. The Pew poll mentioned above traced a surprising trend among young evangelicals: From 2005 to 2007 the number of young white evangelicals identifying themselves as Republicans
dropped
15 percentage points (from 55% to 40%). In that same period, party identification among older evangelicals dropped just five percentage points. Additionally, support for President Bush dropped dramatically among young evangelicals in that same time frame, from 70% to 45%. Young evangelicals are pulling away from the Republican Party.
Why has this political shift occurred? Perhaps the younger generation is frustrated by the means and methods of the Religious-Right/Republican alliance over the past two decades. All too often, this relationship has been characterized by empty rhetoric, scandal, broken promises, and a failure to deliver results. Young evangelicals are signaling that they want a different political approach.
Pro-Life Methods are Just as Important as the Message
One does not have to be a Yellow Dog Democrat to be frustrated with the current state of conservative politics.
Numerous
articles
have
pointed
to the frustration that young people have with the current state of conservative evangelical politics. Young evangelicals want a broader agenda, encompassing care for the poor, needy, and abused, in addition to relief for the unborn and support for traditional families. They want a more careful, thoughtful public presentation of their beliefs. They are tired of the red meat rhetoric and judgmental spirit that has all too often characterized the activism of the Religious Right.
Is the pro-life movement destined to splinter? Possibly—unless some significant steps are taken soon to reconcile the approaches of older and younger evangelicals. The core beliefs of these two groups are not that different—young evangelicals are still concerned about most of the issues that concern their predecessors. The difference lies primarily in their rhetoric and their vision of the scope of the pro-life agenda. Young evangelicals want a change in the tone and tenor of the debate and they want a more full orbed application of the principles that undergird the pro-life movement. They care about issues like racism, poverty, elder care, and protecting the environment, in addition to protecting the unborn and encouraging family values. Their additional concerns should be embraced by the older generation of evangelicals that at times neglected important issues involving human dignity and the sanctity of life.
Charles Colson
recently expressed
fear about the commitment of young evangelicals: "Younger evangelicals remain pro-life, but I don't think they have the same fire in the belly about the issue that older evangelicals have had." Colson is right to worry about the younger generation's commitment to the cause in the current cultural and political atmosphere. Young evangelicals must be equipped to confront the dangers of moral and cultural relativism. Here, the experience and wisdom of the older generation can be of great benefit to them.
Conclusion
The strong pro-life commitment of young evangelicals should give us encouragement for the future. Hopefully, the pro-life movement can expand to include a multi-pronged approach to protecting life and preserving human dignity. The decline in the rate of abortions and the increasing acceptance of pro-life messages among young people and the media points to the possibility that this great tragedy might be resolved on the cultural front long before the battle is won on the legal or political fronts.
The protection of human life and dignity is the most important cause for which we can work in the civil sphere. We should continue, and expand, our efforts on all levels: working to outlaw abortion, supporting the adoption movement, helping needy mothers care for their new children, and advocating a consistent life ethic that embraces help and support for the poor, the handicapped, and the elderly.
The defenseless souls we seek to protect deserve nothing less than our full and unwavering support.
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
Ken Connor is Chairman of the
Center for a Just Society
in Washington, DC.
TOWNHALL DAILY:
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
News Articles On This Topic
FIRST-PERSON: A nativity a day
Utah-Idaho Baptists increase CP 3.5%
N.Y. convention marks 40th year
Popular Articles By
Connor
Global Warming in the Hot Seat
Welcome to the School of Social Engineering
Planned Parenthood: Your Tax Dollars At Work
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
182
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
Michael W.
Location:
ME
Reply #
1
Date:
Jan 24, 2009 - 3:06 AM EST
It's Greed and so much more !
The Abortion Industry along with three other industries (Pornography, contraception and Mental Health) that support "Secular Humanist" movement. They are the "Money Machine" behind the moral decline in America.
“During times of universal deceit,
telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
George Orwell... Eric Arthur Blair (1903 – 1950)
Flag as Offensive
Yvonne
Location:
KS
Reply #
2
Date:
Jan 24, 2009 - 1:43 AM EST
really sick
reply #2 is really sick,but in some ways the mind set of the left, this could almost become their mantra.They have tried every thing else. I just wish they would be honest about the whole thing and admitt its the money.Planned Parenthood receives millions and millions from the government, Tiller the baby killer in Kansas gets 5 thousand an abortion.Greed is at the bottom and all the platatudes that they try to make murdder legal it is what it is. Greed
Flag as Offensive
(
Read all 182 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
A "Non-Traditional" Christmas?!
posted at 05:23 PM
All the Former Vice President's Men: ClimateGate
posted at 05:00 PM
Those Whom the Gods Wish to Destroy . . .
posted at 03:42 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The First Team Hour 2
posted on:11/21/2009
Today's Columns
Mehlman :
The Administration’s Phant...
R. Jackson, Jr. :
The Roller Coaster...
Fagan :
The Quiet Family Killer: Por...
Shaw Crouse :
Of Marathons and Marri...
Parker :
Will Baltimore Succumb to C...
Paulson :
Time to Apologize for Futu...
Bialosky :
Selective Thoughts #3
Hunt :
Pardon Me, Huckabee
Adams :
WRAL: White Rapists and Lomb...
Connor :
Global Warming in the Hot S...
Saunders :
Declaring War on Another ...
Hill :
Obamanomics Isn't Producing J...
Chapman :
Boobs in Congress
Will :
Earth's Next Last Chance
Jacob :
Pervasive legal plunder
Zito :
Blue Highway Democrats
Stokes :
Goldie, Gliders, and God
McCullough :
Why Huckabee Ain't Dead...
Giles :
It’s Got to Suck to be a Cli...
Blackwell :
De-Fund Eric Holder's Ma...
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
JIM ABRAMS : Must-pass bills pile up as days wind down
ROBERT BURNS : Gates: 2-4 years of big Afghan role for US troops
PETE YOST : Obama administration seeks to kill Gitmo lawsuit
Today's Cartoons
Monday, Dec. 7
Gary Varvel
Michael Ramirez
Lisa Benson
Eric Allie
More