Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, February 17, 2007
Ken Connor :: Townhall.com Columnist
What Hath Darwin Wrought?
by Ken Connor
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Who, then, wins in a disagreement? From the Darwinist perspective, it's whoever is strongest—whoever survives and reproduces. As Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes declared, truth is merely "the majority vote of that nation that can lick all others."

The Meaning of Life

Darwin's views add up to a life without ultimate meaning. In Darwin's City there is no ultimate goal to life, only existence, whatever existence is. William Shakespeare captured the horror of this perspective in his play, Macbeth: "Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player / That struts and frets his hour upon the stage / And then is heard no more; it is a tale / Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury / Signifying nothing."

The secularist-chance view of life breeds hopelessness and despair. Human beings are mere creatures of chance, beyond the reach of truth, left to try to find meaning in existence when there is none. The secularists maintain that we come from nothing and we are destined for annihilation, yet somehow in-between we are something special. To paraphrase Francis Schaeffer, these secularists have both feet firmly planted in thin-air.

In Darwin's City there is an unholy trinity when it comes to man—he lives in a world without dignity, without truth, and without meaning. How will human beings respond in such an environment? Might they be corrupt in politics, dishonest in business, and boorish in entertainment? If not accountable to a higher power, might they deem themselves accountable only to themselves? Would men like Jack Abramoff and businesses like Enron feel at home in such a place?

Juxtaposed against Darwin's city, there is the "Shining City on the Hill," the one envisioned by Rev. John Winthrop in his famous 1630 sermon. Residents of this place are convinced that, even though human beings are fallen in their nature, they enjoy a fundamental dignity because they are created in God's image. They also have infinite worth because they have been redeemed "with the precious blood of Christ..." (1 Peter 1:19) The Creator has endowed them with the inalienable rights of life and liberty. This is the city of the American Founders. It is the city envisioned by Abraham Lincoln when he said that "this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom..." It is the city of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream, where he could say, "Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!" It was the place Ronald Reagan said was "a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace."

Two different cities based on two different worldviews. Which city will we choose to build?

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ken Connor is Chairman of the Center for a Just Society in Washington, DC.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Pope John Paul II on Evolution
The vatican has no problem with the idea of evolution. It has no problem with chlorophyl and the eye evolving into existence, no claim that they are irreducibly complex. No problem with fossils...

In other words, once the form of man was achieved, God infused him with the first soul.

----

http://catholiceducation.org/articles/science/sc0038.html

The Catholic Church has no problem with "evolution" ie. the idea of continuity between past and present species because it does not insist on a literal reading of the creation account in Genesis.

Catholics who want to read Genesis as a textbook in geology or astrophysics are free to do so, but the Church does not encourage this sort of literalism.

In his catechesis on creation in 1986, John Paul II stated about the first book of Genesis that, "This text has above all a religious and theological importance. There are not to be sought in it significant elements from the point of view of natural science.

Indeed, the theory of natural evolution, understood in a sense that does not exclude divine causality, is not in principle opposed to the truth about the creation of the visible world, as presented in the Book of Genesis.

The doctrine of faith, however, invariably affirms that man's spiritual soul is created directly by God . . . it is possible that the human body, following the order impressed by the Creator on the energies of life, could have been gradually prepared in the forms of antecedent living beings."

The pope is warning us that the sacred author did not in addition mean to give scientific information about how God's creation of man unfolded in the natural order, whether it was done in a flash or over many eons.

is earth's old age "Satan's evil lie"?
[Dr. Who]"evolution is Satan's evil lie"

IOW, [Dr. Who]"change over time" "is Satan's evil lie".

Huh.

Is the earth's old age also "Satan's evil lie"?

////////////////////////
1800s creationists came to accept that the earth is old; Raup
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.4.10A.B3.10001161617160.1771572-100000%40umbc9.umbc.edu

omphalic YEC and blindwatchmakingist parallels
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-b1c67abe.0411270821.29ee3dd9%40posting.google.com

views of Cuvier, d'Orbigny, and Agassiz (all creationists)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.3.96A.980819011221.8126B-100000%40umbc9.umbc.edu

go away, young-earthism
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.LNX.4.44L.01.0310190200530.8725-100000%40linux1.gl.umbc.edu
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.