Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, May 01, 2008
Ken Blackwell :: Townhall.com Columnist
The McCain Coalition
by Ken Blackwell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


In May, Senator McCain will give a much-anticipated speech on judicial nominations and will speak to the members of the National Rifle Association on May 6 and 16, respectively.

These two speeches are smart moves.

The Supreme Court is the single most-important issue for millions of conservative voters. A candidate’s choice of judges can seal the deal or be a deal-breaker.

And the Second Amendment is a critical issue in this presidential election. Millions of swing voters are solid Second Amendment supporters. When a pro-Second Amendment Republican is up against an anti-gun Democrat, that issue can decide the outcome of a close election. It certainly did in 2000 when President Bush beat Al Gore.

Senators Obama and Clinton have taken a shockingly-radical position on firearms, and with the D.C. gun ban case pending before the Supreme Court, it’s critical for Mr. McCain to reaffirm his support of the Second Amendment to the NRA.

Mr. McCain also is reaching out to swing voters and to those who normally don’t hear from the Republican presidential nominee — he is traveling to areas that don’t often see Republican candidates like New Orleans’ Ninth Ward and Youngstown, Ohio. He has criticized the Bush administration’s ham-handed response to Hurricane Katrina. His outreach to minority voters, acknowledging both the Republican Party’s historical mistakes and his own mistakes, showed humility and a willingness to learn and grow. This is what Americans want to see in a president.

Moderate voters sided with the Democrats by huge numbers in 2006, giving that party both chambers of Congress. Mr. McCain’s continued efforts will win back millions of those voters.

The Arizona senator’s path to victory is eased by the fact that many of the issues facing Americans are priorities to both Republican base voters and swing voters. And core Republican principles such as limited government, personal responsibility, and economic opportunity resonate with many Americans, and deliver results.

An example of this is the cost to our society of family fragmentation — divorce and unwed childbearing. A recent study released last week by the Institute for American Values stated that family fragmentation costs American taxpayers $112 billion per year — a staggering sum. That’s more than one trillion dollars over a decade.

According to the study, divorce hits communities with increased costs for antipoverty and other social welfare programs. And, it also reduces government coffers because it lowers the incomes and tax brackets of those individuals.

Divorce creates even more economic damage when you look at litigation costs, liquidating assets, child care, counseling, relocation, and all the other economic difficulties that everyone going through divorce is faced with.

So the conservative agenda of encouraging marriage and doing everything possible to help couples get through tough times is something that many swing voters welcome. While not all marriages are saved, there are countless situations where the right help at the right time can make the difference. The conservative emphasis on teaching family values, honoring your marriage, and caring for children as a precious gift, reverberates with people from all walks of life and all political stripes.

And studies like the one referenced above also unite social conservatives with economic conservatives. Helping couples succeed in marriage helps children, helps the economy, and helps the nation. As Senator McCain speaks out on issues like these, he will find the majority of Americans nodding in agreement.

So while Senators Clinton and Obama continue their slugfest, Mr. McCain can address these issues. If Mr. McCain continues to energize and mobilize the Republican base while winning over moderate voters, he just might become the 44th president of America.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mr. Blackwell, a contributing editor at Townhall.com, is a senior fellow at the Family Research Council and American Civil Rights Union.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ken Blackwell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
deluded Right
yet convinced me who will be the best president for the country in the long run. Pending convincing information, i will vote 3rd party in hopes of establishing a useful protest/conservative vote.>>


Yeah, stupid is going to establish a 'useful' protest vote.

You deluded fools should be kept in rubber rooms and away from children and small animals.

You want to make a real difference?. Then admit you and the rest of the RR are not conservatives. It would be a service to your country and every republican would thank you.

Clearly, there is nothing conservative about a lunatic willing to burn down the party, ruin the court, and all in the name of saving something.

stupid drones
The Republican party bosses need to learn not to screw with the base. Send us someone we can believe in or stay out of the way.>>

Catch a clue, stupid. The base of the party nominated McCain.

You lunatics could do a lot for the party if you just stopped calling yourselves conservatives.

Not only don't we need your lunatic fringe group ... we need you gone. Your lunatic version of conservativsim doesn't belong in a center right country. Get out.

flush the RR
I will not vote for McShameful

Why.??.

We all know why.....

>>>

Because he won't wear your ideological burka ... no one would, not even Reagan. So just shut up about Reagan. He was a big Tent republican, not a RR wing Jihadi. Reagan made us the majority party, and you freaks make us a permanent minority.

Make the republican party right ... run off every lunatic RR wing freak in sight.

Flush the RR
Somebody tell the RR to just shut up! These Freaks dirty the word conservative! And their lunatic version of conservativism has made republicans a minority party.

Listen to these stupid RR wing Jihadis that are willing to burn down the party, ruin the court, and all for some lunatic notion of saving something.

Seriously, we should round up all the RR wing nuts and make them pick up garbage along the freeway. For once in the stupid lives these freaks should be made to do something ... anything useful.

VP
Actually, the justice appointments are not my #1 concern. They are one of the most important things a president can do, and it matters for a long time. But for me this election, top of my list is CIC. I can't abandon our troops to either of the Dem candidates.

dreadnot
McCain may indeed win without the votes of conservatives. You'll not get any justices that Ted Kennedy won't like.

I will not vote for McShameful

Why.??.

We all know why.....

He ought to change parties and become the modern Democrat he has shown us to be.

If you want to poison the United States then let it be someone who is expected to do so, not someone we might MAYBE trust. The Republican party bosses need to learn not to screw with the base. Send us someone we can believe in or stay out of the way.

One more example of this kind of gerrymandering and the Republican party can count me, and I suspect many others, as out of the loop.

Who needs some fat cats to tell us how to vote.

Ms. Clinton wants to be prez, well come on in, the water will soon be boiling. At least we won't have dead from "friendly fire".


zany virginny:
It changes plenty if McCain appoints two Justices closer to Scalia and Roberts. But you balance the scales by stacking hatred on yours.

Who cares? The whole world doesn't revolve around your petty prejudice, thank God. Trust us; we'll elect Sen. McCain without your vote.

SunThe1
The most likely retirements are Ginsberg and Stevens. Changes nothing if Obama appoints liberals.

BAMAddox
So you think the SCOTUS appointments are very important. You can't be SURE that Sen McCain will appoint conservatives. So you're not going to vote for him. Does that mean you're kinda sure that Sen Obama will appoint conservatives to the bench?

Further, you're going to vote 3rd party apparently. And you're going to hope someone grows a backbone. Hmmm.


SCOTUS us very important
McCain says he will nominate conservative justices but he also says he is a conservative.
Can we trust him to do that or will he defer to Teddy Kennedy to help him with his pick?
If he is president I believe he will sign all the legislation sent up from the dems in congress.
Hopefully the republicans in congress will grow a backbone after McCain's defeat and loudly oppose liberals.
I cannot vote for anyone I do not feel is good for the country and will not vote for any of the three poor choices left.

VP (8:37)
If you believe that Sen Obama or Sen Clinton will enforce the laws - actually the law you care about- better than Sen McCain, go for it.
I think that's a stretch.
You're (understandably) angry about the immigration bill,(which I can respect), but I think your vote in Nov will be more vengeance than strategic. In other words, you're willing to sacrifice an awful lot for your key issue.
So be it.

No Enforcement/No Votes
Unless McCain comes out for enforcement and no amnesty he will not get my vote.

McCain Backer Hagee?

McCain Backer Hagee: Abortions Easier To Get In Public School Than Aspirin

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/mccain-backer-hage e-abortions-easier-to-get-in-public-school-than-aspirin


Poor choices
Mr. Blackwell, you are right; there are many conservative voters that consider SCOTUS nominations to be the most important issue in the campaign. I am one of them.

Would McCain appoint a justice that would overturn McCain-Feingold? I think not. Moreover, any justice that would uphold the blatant subversion of First Amendment rights that is McCain-Feingold will almost surely uphold other constitutionally subversive decisions, such as Kelo and Roe.

I lost hope for the Supreme Court when Romney withdrew.

the libs are still the mosquitos
I am not into pendulums. This is the first election of the rest of our lives.

Yttrium
If the refrig was full of bud lite, it would make a good commercial. In my version, Ann Coulter could stay but, Reagan would be replaced with John Stossel and Walter Williams. Reagan would be serving the grapes. Don't shoot me.

Have faith. It is the democrats turn, after all in this back and forth system we have. Every iteration brings both parties further left though. The overall economic philosophy of liberty vs. government control through equalization ideology is the one thing that will determine whether this country continues its path of economic leadership or becomes a European style socialist cesspool ripe for takeover.

It is the engine that will advance our standard of living and that of every other country if allowed. It is too important to allow the republican party to fall into the democratic handout vote buying philosophy of the other party. If both parties do this, we are doomed.

You fall into the camp that thinks we can vote more true conservatives into office when the pendulum is swinging the other way. Better to get some more Jimmah style government now and get if out of the way then watch the same thing happen in slow motion with Jimmah lite.

ScarletPimpernel
Hilarious. That calls for your very own YouTube video, you know. After "It's Raining McCain," "I've got a crush on Obama," and "Hillary, I love you," you are sure to get 5 stars.

Bob
writes, "McCain has made plenty of mistakes, but that wasn't one of them."

We will never really know will we? Your point is certainly possible and you wrote a good thoughtful post but, I for one was looking forward to a little meltdown. I think it may do the body good.

Vote 3rd Party or Write In for 2008
So here's the plan: On the edge of a cliff, we strap a refridgerator to our backs, and put skis on. Then, we turn on the ice machine and sail off the cliff, skiing to a nearby oasis; but not just any oasis. In this one, Ronald Reagan and Ann Coulter eat pealed grapes from a silver platter and swat mosquito-sized liberals all day long.

Airgun, exactly right
but the pavlovians believe "this time will be different" in regards to the Stupid Party's response to Dem/lib doing business as usual.

Stupid socons
Mr. Blackwell, you rush in where angels fear to tread.

McCain abandoned his own crippled wife for a wealthy "c*nt," in his own words. What makes you think he will strengthen marriage?

McCain abandoned the NRA and stabbed gun owners in the back with "loophole" legislation. What makes you think he will strengthen gun rights?

If a McCain government does intervene with "everything possible to help couples get through tough times," what makes you think he will not intervene with everything possible to end gun crime? His "support of the Second Amendment to the NRA?"

There is one born every minute.

But we will see who he wants to appoint to the SCOTUS in May. If nothing else, it will make good entertainment.

Um Bob...
Had the spineless republican majority excercized the nuclear option, Alito's nomination would have been moot.
Not only that, but we wouldn't have hundreds of empty benches still waiting to be filled.
The dems HAVE NEVER STOPPED FILIBUSTERING!
Do you understand??
Judicial filibusters are extra-constitutional, ergo illegal, and need to be abolished.

Bravo, Sun the1


You stated exactly what I do; and it's a no-brainer. The apple-knockers here should've understood by this time.

McCain intends to back Gen. Petraeus to the hilt. Hillary won't. Obama definitely won't.

What's more, by allowing the Dems to get back in the White House, we can be sure the next Supreme Ct Justice will be to the ultra-left. He's been bought and paid for by Democrats.

Only if we all back McCain can we be sure HE, or his VP, either one, makes the next pair of SCOTUS nominations. We cannot waste this election voting on single issues of any other kind.

Time is on our GOP's side with problems in border enforcement; which is the main bugaboo these plebes have about McCain. Why do you think they all say, "McAmnesty?" That's the shibboleth of these fringe crazies. They are almost all knee-jerk white supremacists who detest Mexico. They can WAIT!

The Supreme Court is nearing two new vacancies during our next American President's term(s.) We can't wait another 4 years to get the White House.

It's now or never. I'm voting for McCain!

Supreme Court.
The big A+ for President Bush has been his Supreme Court nominations and eventual confirmations. I would hope (President) McCain can put one if not two on the court. What a huge victory that would be for Conservatives.

Skep41
Sometimes the only way to rid ourselves of a jellyfish GOP rep. is to elect a stand up Dem. Some do exist. Heath Shuler D-NC (one of the blue dogs '06) was the one who introduced the SAVE Act. They need 32 more signatures on the discharge petition to get it to a floor vote. Everybody, Call your Congressmen.

This article gets it right
SCOTUS is in fact the most important issue for me, which is why, for as much as I despise amnesty, the chance to overturn Roe v. Wade finally after more than 30 years is something I'm willing to vote for McCain on.

skep41 and Perot
It's obvious your take on Perot is far different from mine. I had the privilege of meeting him in 1968, the same year (I believe) that he became America's youngest billionaire. (That's a pretty good return on the $5,000 investment it took to get EDS started.)

For a more balanced look at Perot, the man, you might want to take a gander at Ken Follett's "On Wings of Eagles". Although it's primarily about Perot going to Tehran to help rescue EDS employees being held in prison during the hostage crisis, it also covers other aspects of his life. Perot wasn't satisfied with the way the Carter administration was (mis)handling the situation, so he went to Tehran himself, right into the mouth of the dragon, to take matters into his own hands.

Perot may be a cynic at times, just as are we all, but ruthless only in holding others to the same high standards to which he holds himself.

If you care for your Country
And what the troops are trying to achieve, you will vote for McCain.
War on Terror is not a job for Democrat.

SunThe1
The President is supposed to ENFORCE the laws. This one hasn't, Mccain has given every indication he won't.

Not voting for that again.

The perfect candidate
I'm not sure who the candidate would be who could win some of your votes, but I do know that person would not get elected.

So go cast your third party votes, or your write ins, and feel all fine about yourselves (which means continued disgruntlement).

There is no perfect candidate, but when one considers what the president can actually do (and hint: it's not making laws) there's alot at stake here.

I will not throw our military under the bus by casting a vote that would make either Sen Clinton or Sen oBama their Commander in Chief.





stop by won't you?
Forgive me, Carly Simon for doing this to your fantastic song:

You walked over the Party
Like you were walking onto a Yacht
Your finger strategically placed up high
Keating almost got you caught
You had one eye in the mirror as
You watched yourself go by
And all the Libs dreamed that they'd be your partner
They'd be your partner and

You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
Don't you? Don't you?

You had me several years ago
When I was still quite naive
And then you lost the 2000 election year
But you said you would never leave
Now you're trashing all the things I love
You push for amnesty
All the cons dreams, they were clouds in my coffee
Clouds in my coffee, and

You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
Don't you? Don't you?

All of our dreams they were just clouds in my coffee
Clouds in my coffee, and

You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
Don't you? Don't you?

Well, I hear you teamed up with Russ Feingold
And your bill naturally won
Then you flew your Lear jet to Hyannisport
To get Teddy's advice how to run
Well, you're blocking judges all the time
And when you're not, you start
to suck up to some Media Guy or the Dem/libs
Yeah all those Dem/libs and,

You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
You're so McCain
I bet you think this country's about you
Don't you? Don't you?

(that's Mick on the background vocals)

Bob, but
if we get rid of the McCains, Frists, Hasterts, Ws, L. Grahams etc the Stupid Party won't have to worry about being in the minority! Can't you guys see that it was the mod repubs that cost you the majority? Who was it that got the Stupid Party the majority? the cons. Who was the greatest? Ronaldus Magnus. You'll never learn.

renny
I do think McCain will win after Denver burns. He will win 1.5 million votes to 789,345 votes. He won't be popular and will get little done (at least for our side - for the Dems he'll probably pass 2 more huge agenda pieces for them).

Skep - lol. I know what you mean Dalton, Ga is a border town now.

Justices
skep41 (3:10pm): "I live in the district of the Ninth Circus Court Of Appeals. A third of the seats on this idiotically liberal court are vacant because some 'maverick'and his 'Gang Of 14 Morons' protected the filibuster rule and prevented conservative judges from being confirmed when we had a majority in the Senate."
RealCommonSense (3:16pm) "If you think McCain will give us justices like Roberts or Alito, think again.... McCain will NOT nominate a justice who will invalidate his pet anti-free speech law, McCain Feingold.... one of his judicial advisors is Warren Rudman, ...who brought Souter to Bush 41."

Reagan gave us Sandra Day O'Connor. If you were paying attention at the time, you'd know that the Gang of 14 deal was what got Alito the up/down vote that confirmed him. Changing the filibuster rule would have haunted Republicans down the road, say, if the Dems had the majority and the White House, and tried to pack the court with Ruth Bader Ginsbergs. Remember Lani Guinier? Keeping the filibuster rule intact will keep some future Republican Senate minority from having to allow a basket-case like that get appointed. The Senate Dems were off their freaking rockers during the Roberts and Alito hearings, and there was a real chance of a Senate meltdown. We got two young, brilliant jurists onto the bench during that period, so count your blessings. McCain has made plenty of mistakes, but that wasn't one of them.
The problem with Souter is Souter, not Rudman. Other judges have turned out differently than expected; Earl Warren was a Republican, and appointed by Eisenhower. And it was John Sununu's idea to nominate Souter, not Rudman's.
And for what it's worth, McCain voted against Clinton's nomination of John Fletcher to 9th Circuit.

McCain's coalition
consists of the Pavlovians and the constituents of Feingold, Kennedy, Hagel, the Greenies etc. Voting out of fear is unnecessary.

Besides McCain already allayed your fears:

MR. RUSSERT: Senator McCain, a serious question: Do you think the lady to your right would make a good president?

SEN. CLINTON: Oh, we can't hear you, Tim. We can't hear you.

SEN. McCAIN: Yeah, you're breaking up. I am sure that Senator Clinton would make a good president. I happen to be a Republican and would support, obviously, a Republican nominee, but I have no doubt that Senator Clinton would make a good president.

Feel The Pain of Voting McCain
Rep IS Dem this time around.

Any candidate other than R or D.

Renny
What do you mean "if"; McLame has no chance of winning. Zero, zip, nada, none. He is, in addition to being a liberal, unwilling to issue the mildest criticism of any Democrat; he reserves his rage for Republicans. He cant speak, loses his temper at the drop of a hat, is older than my grandpa's mule and is backed by the repulsive pack of weasels who have jettisoned every conservative ideal and just yearn to get their scaly hands on the levers of power. We're in for a disaster whoever wins.

Renny
I dont need to move to Mexico. I live in Los Angeles so Mexico has moved to me (Muchas Gracias Senator McLame!). I've learned fair Spanish and I use it often. I watch Spanish-language TV news so I can see what my mayor and the more important legislators are up to. Unfortunately I cant take you up on your suggestion because Mexican immigration laws are among the toughest in the world... they HATE foreigners down there and enforce their border ruthlessly. I will vote for every Republican on the ballot but just not any 'mavericks', you know, the kind who hate Republicans and spend all their time 'across the aisle'.

Sanfu, re:3:43pm
Excellent point!

100 citizen militia's with 100 citizens each, end up getting shot at. 100,000 citizen militia's with 100 citizens each, call the shots. We just have to make sure that we are all togather on restoring Constitutional law.

You just all may as well move
to Mexico and enjoy the wonderful amenities there.

If you don't choose Rep. over Dem. in this election, may you cut out your own tongue, smash your right index finger to keep it off the keyboard, and lay back and wait for the Dems. to run over you.

Nothing you ever do or say on principle will mean anything if Hillary or Barack get into the White House. Then you can cry your crocodile tears, but they will only grease the tax increases and energy increases the libs. will lay on you and a crippled Am. for years.

SNAFU
I heard him described as such by Louis Rukeyser and Jim Grant (the interest rate and currency guru). Grant made a joke about Perot, "Anybody who's short on intermediate-term Japanese government bonds cant be all bad." The point of the joke was a slap at the dolts who were buying the folksy image Perot so cynically assumed as that type of bond trading is restricted to a tiny clique of very sophisticated players. Perot has always had a reputation for ruthlessness which I cant document at the moment. Getting Jim Wright to subsidize an airport outside of Fort Worth and granting it free port status is one example of his many shady deals with his fellow crooks. Rukeyser mentioned him in the context of Soros as Perot was also involved in the totally legal and ethical looting of half of Britain's foreign currency reserves, a game that only people who could command a hundred million dollars instantly could play. Perot was a twenty-four-carat phony. He never disclosed the nature or size of his income.
Turning the keys of the treasury and the Fed over to that sawed-off egomaniac would have been a rash act indeed.

renny
writes, "Look at Bubba's presidentail edicts, none of which have been undone including the one that essentially makes Am. a multi-lingual country."

Exactly.

Exactly why I will not cast a vote for McCain. Bush was a lefty conservative by comparison. Almost not a conservative, on the left edge but, just barely on the edge. He would not fix many of Clinton's disgraces and you want to give McCain a shot? He is not only left of Bush, he is left of a great many conservative democrats. One has to bring up outright communists like Hillary or Barak to make him look even moderate.

You are not making the logical next conclusion. Your party has left you. They are a liberal party now. You can support this by voting McCain or oppose it by any other vote or none at all.

The only thing, and I mean the ONLY thing he can be trusted to do is not surrender to Islamic terrorism. I seriously doubt if either other candidate will regardless of what they say. They might pull back some, give them more room but, what has been started will continue in some fashion for better or worse and not exactly to our liking because that is life. Not everyone is going to do what you want them to.

No one and nothing has
yet convinced me who will be the best president for the country in the long run. Pending convincing information, i will vote 3rd party in hopes of establishing a useful protest/conservative vote. And i am an old fogie. There is very little Obama can do to damage me. And what am i leaving my kids? Perhaps a lesson in PC leftwing Peanut Jimmy type disaster is just what they need to wake up and get some sophistication about what govt and politicians can and can not do.

nonsense, proud lib
How is it liberals always think they're clairevoyant? You have no idea what's going to happen in Iran in 100 days or in ten years. Save your vague, guttural generalities for when you have your liberal poker party; when you might have to say, "I'll fold." You HAVE saved your money for that glittering poker party, haven't you?

Lol!

Vague glittering generalities
Blackwell once again wants the GOP candidate to wrap himself in apple pie, motherhood, the flag and guns. He seems to believe the old saying that you can never go wrong underestimating the publics gullibility.

McCain will bomb Iran within the first hundred days of his presidency. He is a disaster.

Dear Virginny Zany
You seem to think you speak for all conservatives. Using words like "us, we."

A large segment of the conservative base is sure to vote for our Republican candidate; especially when the name of his VP running mate is announced. Of course, guys like you, not quite clueless but nevertheless dumb, won't wait to see who the Vice-Presidential candidate might be. Knowing McCain won't live forever, that person may well end up in the very short term as the President of our country. That Vice-Pres might be in fact who nominates our next two Supreme Court Justices; all while we were expecting McCain to do that. FATE is sneaky.

I suspected McCain might reach down in the bag and pull out George Allen. Or, Mark Sanford or another good conservative. Somebody who can help him gain the southern vote (except for your lone spitball.) Might be just the ticket. (Never mind, you write in a Bozo who'll get one vote: yours. Lol!)

just a thought for you
To "Just a so-called thought,"

So McCain won't be getting your precious vote, Hmm? That's OK, vote for a loser. Write in your loser's name. I'll vote for the winner and new President of the U.S.A., Republican Senator John McCain. Guess that makes up for your powerful vote.

Next case.

.

The Coalition Of The Spineless
The GOP bobbleheads can try to bludgeon us into voting for their liberal, but it won't work.

Conservatives will not join the coalition of the spineless.

McCain may still win if Obama is the nominee. His radical friends scare even his own party's voters. The Dems and liberal Repubs who nominated him could be enough to elect him.


Perot, entrepreneur extraordinaire
Quite a few adjectives apply to Ross Perot, but I never expected to see him described as "ruthless" or "cynical". He was, and is, a straightshooter of the sort McCain aspires to be when and if he grows up. He built a computer empire where IBM lacked vision, and the company he spawned, EDS, was a world-class industry leader for as long as Perot held the reins. He was, and is, the source of inspiration for many, especially in the military and ex-POW community.

When did he get into currency trading? Is someone confusing him with George Soros?

RealCommonSense
Perot was a ruthless, cynical billionaire currency trader acting out a personal grudge against George HW Bush. He had no coherent program except his folksy idiocy about rolling his sleeves up and getting under the hood and he attracted blue collar Reagan Democrat types who were outraged at Bush 41's crawling to the libs and raising taxes. In the end his actions led to the election of the worst president in American history... just as McLame's power-grab of the nomination of the party he hates is in the end going to elect the ex-wife of that incompetent reprobate this year.

McCain can't win my vote and he knows it
He has NEVER been even remotely republican let alone conservative.

I am ashamed for all those who shill for the turncoat.

He will start LYING now for the sake of a few votes, but mine won't change.

I will write-in my candidate.

50% of the people on some entitlement
40% of the people are globalists
10% of the people are conservatives

sounds about right.

Tea party - now THAT is conservative!

rlaTEXAS
Your mentioning Ross Perot PROVES the possibility for a successful Third Part run, NOT disproves. Look at the numbers: Perot won 19 percent in 1992. This AFTER he melted down. He was a strong personality (and a nut) and he had a strong message, much of which has proven correct (but he was a nut). Be he still got 19 percent!

Even without a leader, the grass roots successfully killed McCain's amnesty bill last fall, and this with only about two weeks to get it done, and we did it.

Imagine with a good leader what can be accomplished. I am just waiting for one to emerge.

And please understand: if McCain loses, it is McCain's fault, not mine, or other discouraged conservatives. You need to earn my vote. I am not on the GOP plantation.

Whew. Love these reactions!
A lot of passion here. Nice. So, the 1% of outraged voters will not pulling the handle for a candidate. Nice.

I am sure the uniformed majority in this country will. I am also sure voter turnout will be a little above or below 40% and half will vote D or R based on their family and neighbors without regard to who's running. And many, perhaps swing voters will vote based on how they feel in the few days leading up to the election.

But you all keep ranting about how pathetic the candidates are, and 40% of Americans will keep putting them in office.

Good luck moving the mountains.

Tea time?
According to a history book I read some years ago, only about 10% of the American colonists supported an outright revolt from King George's rule. That's probably accurate, since the dumb masses are primarily "sheeple" who just don't care. I wonder if the modern American people contains 10% good conservative people, people who have had their fill of what passes for government in Washington, and who are willing to draw a line in the sand and say "enough".

If so, the time for another tea party may be looming in the not too distant future.

rlaTEXAS
I'm not going to vote to empower the libs in the Republican Party who foisted this liberal, inferior, aged , cranky conservative-hating LOSER on us. Bush was bad enough, and this guy is worse. His only political allies are of the far left, the same far left who hate Hillary, who will have to move RIGHT to have any chance of governing. So let Grandpa dodder back to the Senate as he babbles about Global Warming and Amnesty and the Dems can just get on with destroying the country.

With McCain, You Get Souter
Don't believe for one minute that McCain will appoint anyone remotely resembling Scalia, Alito or Clarence Thomas. This RINO will follow the path set by GHW Bush and we will get another Souter, a Sandra Day O'Screwball , or Anthony Kennedy (barf)_. The most important criteria for Juan McAmnesty will be - Amnesty. He will have a litmus test that will eliminate anyone who does not believe in internationalist, open-borders activism. Couple that with the fact that a filibuster-proof Senate will probably stop any nominee and they will ignore the purple veins in McCain's exploding head as well. There will be no significant difference between McCain & the Dems as far as who is going to replace Ginsburg, Stevens or other retiring Supremes.

McCain=Souter
John McCain=David Souter x 2----or worse. ms

If you vote mccain
The Republican party the party will just move further left. History has already proved that, you get more of what you vote for.

Even if the third party doen't win it will still send a message to the GOP that we won't stand for RINO's. Isn't Hillary to the right of McCain?

Virginia Patriot
"conservatives of any party for Congress"

There is no such thing as a conservative Democrat. They vote for Nancy Pelosi to be speaker and Horrible Harry to be Senate Majority Leader no matter how conservative they say they are during a campaign. A vote or two for guns or capital punishment usually is method to hide confirming votes for judges who will take guns away and cancel capital punishment.The Democrats are responsible for almost every wrong turn this country has taken since the 1930s.They dont deserve any decent person's vote.

3rd party
can anyone say Ross Perot? Sure McCain stinks. We all KNOW that. But the D's stink waaaaaaaaay more, and no third party will win. So when reality sets in, who ya gonna call?
Yeah, POTUS doesn't have the power attributed to the position, but he is the face of the US. He has an impact on the direction we go. And the way it's set up now, he's leading the military. Congress does't necessarily need POTUS for amnesty. WE need POTUS for judicial appointments.

So, PLEASE vote good conservatives into state legislatures and into Congress, but don't hand the presidency to the D's because you're having a temper tantrum!

Think again
If you think McCain will give us justices like Roberts or Alito, think again. When McCain talks about nominating justices like these two, he is simply playing politics to a crowd he thinks he needs to win.

First off, McCain will NOT nominate a justice who will invalidate his pet anti-free speech law, McCain Feingold.

Second, one of his judicial advisors is Warren Rudman, the same man who brought Souter to Bush 41.

Third, how can McCain possibly think he will get an Alito or Roberts through the Senate? Pure egomaniacal fantasy.

Fourth, McCain does not understand "originalism" regarding our constitution.

Vote for McCain if you like, it's your choice, and you are free to do so. Please do not do so with blinders on regarding McCain and the Supreme Court.

The Ninth Circus
I live in the district of the Ninth Circus Court Of Appeals. A third of the seats on this idiotically liberal court are vacant because some 'maverick'and his 'Gang Of 14 Morons' protected the filibuster rule and prevented conservative judges from being confirmed when we had a majority in the Senate. What is this buffoon going to be running on next, free speech or perhaps an immigration crackdown? People who think his SCOTUS picks will be any different than Hillary Clinton's should remember that his judicial adviser is Warren Rudman, the guy who brought us David Souter, one of the worst justices on the court. McLame is a liberal Democrat and will pick his nominees by 'consulting' with Leaky Leahy and that Uriah Heap Of A Hairy Reid.

Congratulations, President McCain!
While McCain might gain from doing the things Mr. Blackwell suggests, in the end, he will become president anyway. Consider. Obama's candidacy deconstructs itself with every passing day. He won't recover from the pastor disaster of Jeremiah Wright, which will drive millions of white Democratic voters from him, leaving him eventually with his core--highly educated, mostly urban liberals. They are not enough to win the Presidency.

Now Clinton: She will be able to hold onto her own base--mostly blue collar, rural, less-well educated white women and some minority support. That's not enough to win the Presidency.

Obama and Clinton will enter their nominating convention looking like a couple of plug-ugly club fighters who just went 12 rounds without a knockdown. Much of the public will have been soured by these brawlers, who have run the most inept campaigns this liberal Democrat has seen since, well...John Kerry.

The result will be that McCain appears as the fresh, vital, idealistic, competent candidate, the one who is not an embittered hard case. He will win, no matter which Democrat gets the nearly worthless nomination at thee convention.

Fear Is McCain's Only Hope
Fear of jihadis and fear of the Democrats. Only problem is, he IS a Democrat, with an R jersey on. Vote third party for President and conservatives of any party for Congress.

Coalition is the wrong one
John McCain's not trying to make a coalition by going to the "unusual" places, he's just going to his liberal base. I don't believe what John McCain may say NOW about guns and amnesty or judges any more than I believe Obama's stories about his preacher friend. I've made up my made based on his past actions, not on his current rhetoric which will be as changing as Obama's. McCain will try to say whatever he has to to try to fool conservatives. He won't fool me - I've see how he behaves. I will vote this fall, but my vote will not go to McCain, Clinton, or Obama. It will go to someone else, more deserving.

Here is a real conservative
There is a party called The New American Independent Party, and they have been active for 4 years. This year they conducted a run off vote to select a candidate for President, and the person who won that vote is a fellow named Frank McEnulty. I am convinced he gives us the best shot at a credible campaign that could win if we mobilize enough folks.
Frank's positions on the issues are very close to mine and I have no qualms about giving him my support.

You can check out his website,http://frankforpresident.org/

as well as the party's site, http://newamericanindependent.com/

also here http://www.firesociety.com/article/23926/My-Presidential-C ampaign/

All I ask it to check him out for yourself – people we need to unite behind a true conservative.

You are Right on Bob
2008 is a wash we have to concentrate on changing the corrupt Congress and don't forget the home town polititians, they become the delegates and elctorate that screws the people God help us

Sounds great, Kenny...
...unfortunately somebody else by the same name is the presumptive nominee.

Better than the Maoist Stalinist Hilobama on any issue isn't remotely good enough.

Mack a 2nd Amendment champion?! He doesn't even respect the 1st Amendment! Consider:
- "McCain-Feingold" was primariy a swipe aimed at the NRA. ...
- ... because our greatest asset in the 1990's gun-ban battles has been our ability to reach the people thru advertising (a case of freedom of the press) as well as the freedom of assembly, bypassing the established pop media that parroted the phoney discredited "science" of gun-bans-reduce-crime.
- The Gang of 14 stunt & other opposition to good judicial appointees. Good judges look at the Constitution & say "Gee, this means what it says. Even this funny Second Amendment." Bad judges look for rhetorical loopholes to get the outcome they already want.

When a politician "grows" he turns big-government leftist. That's what the pop media means when they say that. Mack is already badly swollen. If he blames Bush (who sent military aid that was waved off) & the GOP (doesn't run N.O. or La) for the response to Katrina in N.O. he's a disingenuous fool.

What exactly is his appeal to "moderates?" On what theory do "moderates" want extreme radicalism like energy rationing, supression of political speech, open borders/ illegal alien presence/ expanded low-wage alien "guest" workers? His base is the Rockie GOP elite, the pop media, & the crossover Dems who'll vote Hilobama in Nov.

His "appeal" to conservatives is not due to anything he does or says whatsoever; they're being fearmongered into taking him in preference to Hilobama, in spite of his manifest strident ANTI-conservatism. His nomination is a plot to alienate the GOP from its so-called "right wing." If we fall for it, that's all we'll ever get from them from now on.

It's always the lesser evil
Politics is called the art of the possible.

Mccain will pick up some of the wounded that either Dem. nom. leaves behind; the prof. women and blue collar guys whose bitterness won't let them vote for Obama; or the disaffected blacks who think the Dems. dissed them when they chose a more viable candidate. Or, the disenchanted blacks won't come out and vote 90% for the Dems. at all, and that would be good for McCain also.

McCain has an 83% rating from the ACU, which isn't an A but is far from a failure.

He has never had an earmark and says he won't sign legislation that has them. For that alone, he's worth having as a pres.

He has never voted for a tax increase and started his career with Reagan and the 80s cons. movement. He once used to give a pig award of the month for unjust pork and appeared regularly in Waste Watch of Citizens Against Gov. Waste.

He is, unlike Kerry, a genuine war hero, someone who knew five years of torture, someone who cannot put on a shirt or jacket without help as his arms and shoulders are frozen, someone who will not humiliate the people in the services, and the person who may improve the poor way we sometimes treat our veterans.

McCain is not perfect, but no perfect cons. would get elected pres. He's experienced and tested in the pol field, admired by both sides of the ailse, may have a temper but someone who wouldn't get angry at some of the nonsense in pub. life today wouldn't have enough emotion to actually meet the challenges a pres. faces.

McCain is not a conservative
The dagger thru the heart of the conservative movement will be the result of voting McCain into office. There will be no voices he listens to (his eternal ego expected) other than those who sit across the aisle on the liberal side. He is a liberal, pure and simple, who happens to have strong beliefs in keeping America safe(although this does not wash with his open borders agenda).

The dumbfoundingly-stupid Bill Clinton was muzzled effectively after 2 years by a solid, conservative majority in both Houses of Congress. Any success of the '90s was due to Congress, not the President.

It is the same this year, as we select from three liberals for President. Congress is the key. Is McCain as liberal as the other two? Of course not. But the damage of a liberal within the GOP would devastate conservative agendas and reduce the party to a prolonged minority role for years.

I say we
1) fight for conservatives in Congressional races
2) NOT elect a liberal Republican who disses whenever he can those he wishes support from

DON'T TRUST HIM
Get the movie Manchurian Candidate and watch it there are two versions both are good and food for thought

Read your history
Reagan granted amnesty to 1.7 million illegals in 1986. He also raised taxes. The Reagan of mythology is not the Reagan of reality.

Just say to yourself over and over again...President Hillary Clinton

or even worse...President Barack Obama

You'll have lots of time to think about this when you are waiting in line for eight hours for you doctor's appointment (that you waited months for) when the government takes over health care. You'll also think about it when your tax rate goes up.

DO YOU KNOW HOW BAD IT IS?
It would seem that our choices were extremely limited in the 2008 Primaries results, to include only the most liberal candidates possible with the upper echelon of both parties insuring that the early elections weeded out the more moderate or conservative candidates.

Below are two questions from a list of twenty that were presented to a group of actively involved republicans at the grass root level.

Do you believe the Primary Voting system is fair and allows ALL of the people/states to have an equal vote in the process? YES_____NO____NOT SURE___
Do you know how the Primary system has evolved and by whom the dynamic has been put in place? YES___ NO___ NOT SURE___ and do you think, similar to the Presidential election, a more equitable all state inclusive ONE DAY voting Primary format should be instituted? YES ____ NO____NOT SURE___

The answers indicated that the majority of people are in agreement regarding the loss of their vote and in their belief that they did not have a real choice for their candidate. Not one person was aware of how the Primary system worked or how it has changed over the years.


If McCain's lips are moving...

he's either lying or changing his mouth's position on Ted Kennedy's *ss.

He can give all the speeches he wants...only a fool will listen and believe.

THE LESSER OF THE EVILS
I am sick of always voting for the lesser of the evils and in 2008 we have such a miniscule difference in the three liberal candidates that it makes no difference. Time to change the system folks, check out nass.org and see how we got into this mess. Polititians are in charge and we think we have a vote???

On guns
Since 1980 the Republican nominee has won every time -- and only when -- endorsed by the NRA.

McCain is rated "C" by the NRA, and has so far refused to respond to the Gun Values Questionnaire.

There's no way the NRA should endorse the fool.

Further, if SCOTUS delivers a strong pro-gun ruling in Heller, for gun owners there would be absolutely no reason to consider McCain.

McCain endorsed the Lauterbach Amendment that supposedly is designed to close "loopholes" in gun laws.

This idjit's no friend of gun owners.

You can rag on Mccain
to your heart's content, but you got three choices;

Clinton
McCain
Obama

You aren't going to get Ronald Reagan, and he did next to nothing for cons. He appointed Sandra Day O'Connor who became the Sup. Court's most reliable pro-abortion babe.

Unlike Bush, who signed anti-partial birth abortion legislation, Reagan never had the chance to sign such legislation.

I liked Reagan, and he's the reason I'm a Rep., but he basically talked a good domestic values game and then simply pursued his foreign policy to end communism, a really much more const. role than talk of school prayer and gun control.

Pres.'s cannot overturn court verdicts, tell states how to be legislated and governed (the recent Medelin Case reminded Bush he could not tell TX how to run its justice system), change state marriage laws, or take over the role of grand administrator of public schools.

McCain is it. Or, you have the liberal whackos of your choice. You hold the future in your own hands.

OUT OF TOUCH
I'M ONE OF THOSE THAT HE ACCUSED OF BEING AN OUT OF TOUCH CONSERVATIVE / REPUBLICANS WHO WILL NEVER VOTE FOR AN OUT OF TOUCH McCAIN. HE SHOULD ENGAGE HIS BRAIN BEFORE HE ENGAGES HIS FOUL MOUTH, HOT HEADED IRRATIONAL AND IRRESPONSIBLE TEMPER. I AM ALSO ONE OF THOSE INDIVIDUASLS LABELED A " BIGOT " BY HIS BROWN NOSED --- KISSING LAP DOG LINDSEY GRAHAM BECAUSE I DARED TO REJECTED THEIR AMNESTY BILL.

McCAIN WILL NEVER GET MY VOTE

I don't care
what McCain's campaign positions are. I'm not voting for him based upon his record. I expect he'll revert to form if he gets elected and I am not a fan of amnesty, NCLB, McCain-Feingold anti-free speech. Now he's for socializing the mortgage industry. He agrees with Ted Kennedy too often. That's all I need to know. Campaign rhetoric is just that. It should be called what it really is for truth in labeling purposes: HOT AIR.
If you want to bask in John McCain's HOT AIR go on ahead. I warn you it will turn cold as soon as it is past your ears.

McCain Ignores The Message
FAMILY VALUES- The only thing he knows about it is that if you have an opportunity to dump your old sick wife do so but make sure you find a YOUNG RICH CHICK TO MARRY BEFORE YOU DO SO.

JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS- His expertise is ABANDON YOUR PARTY, JOIN THE OPPOSITION ( GANGE OF 14 ) AND THEN BAD MOUTH A CONSERVATIVE JUDGE.

AMNESTY- When asked what he would do if he was president and the AMNESTY BILL HE PUSHED was presented to him he said " I WOULD SIGN IT " WHY DOESN'T HE MAKE HIS POSITION CLEAR.

GLOBAL WARMING- NO PROOF but he bought GORES BIG LIE.

ANY WONDER WHY AFTER VOTING A STRAIGHT GOP TICKET FOR 54 YEARS I'M SITTING THIS ONE OUT?

McCAIN IS A RINO CHARLATAN

VPatriot-OCajun
DITTOES! McAmnesty McMidget as much as said he didn't want my vote. Therefore he WILL NOT GET MY VOTE or MY MONEY!

McCain's moving to the middle already...
McCain is already trying to score with the Democrats that would have voted for the Hillary/Obama loser. He doesn't appear to be concerned about the conservative base of the party. He's a politician first like the other two.

It doesn't matter much who's President as long as liberals don't get the super majority in the Senate. The President can't lower/raise taxes, lower gas prices, pass National Health Care, pass an Amnesty Bill or approve the appropriation of a nickel of tax dollars. All those things are done by Congress. All the promises by the candidates is rhetoric.

Conservatives should be focused on Congress.


A vote not for McCain is
not only amnesty (which he now disavows) but also ALL THE LIBERAL AGENDA: HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA, FEMINIST AGENDA, FAIRNESS DOCTRINE TO BE USED TO STOP CONS. TALK RADIO AND CENSORE SITES LIKE TH, MILITARY HUMILIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST, INSECURITY HERE AT HOME, TREATING THE WAR ON TERROR LIKE CRIMINAL JUSTICE TO THE DELIGHT OF TRIAL LAWYERS, TWO OR MORE IDIOTS ON THE SUPREME COURT, AND ASSUMPTION OF YOUR PRIVATE LIFE THROUGH NATIONAL HEALTH CARE.

Those people stuck on McCain and amnesty should get out of the old record groove and realize there isn't going to be anyone else. And you surely don't want Hillary or Barack, because the damage they can cause in only four years cannot be undone. Look at Bubba's presidentail edicts, none of which have been undone including the one that essentially makes Am. a multi-lingual country.

McCain got the message
Senator McCain made it clear months ago that he got the message on securing the border first. It's Hillary and Obama who are still talking about amnesty, McCain has said he will not.

I'm voting for McCain in Nov. And I do not vote for surrender.

RE: A Vote For McCain=A Vote For Amnesty
And a non-vote or a vote for a third party candidate (I persume you would not vote for Obama or Clinton since they supported amnesty too) isn't a vote for amnesty? I am strongly opposed to rewarding illegals for breaking our laws but I also am opposed to a tax increase, an even worse amnesty bill (which most certainly will be the case with a Dem president and even more Dem House and Senate) and to legislating from the Supreme Court bench which will also most assuredly be the case with appointments made by Clinton or Obama. We as conservatives need to hold our nose and do whatever we can to insure that does not happen and frankly the only way to do that is to vote for McCain (as much as I hate to say it).

McCain and family values.
4 paragraphs about family values, but McCain never talks about things like that. I doubt anyone will really base their vote for McCain on family values. As I remember, Romney was the only one talking such things.

A Vote For McCain=A Vote For Amnesty
McCain has not changed his mind about amnesty.

http://townhall.com/columnists/AmandaCarpenter/2008/03/28/b loggers_press_mccain_adviser_on_immigration
“John McCain’s position on immigration is very clear and this a question that gets asked at townhall appearances everyday in media appearances and has answered the question at least a thousand times before the New Hampshire primary,” Schmidt said.

He explained, “Any person who supports John McCain’s campaigns is a subscriber to John McCain’s views"

A vote for McCain is a vote for surrender of your country. Your vote for McCain will be used as proof that you want amnesty.



Many of us see another amnesty as the end of the Republic, the stampede it will set off will be overwhelming. If we don't stop the inundation none of the rest matters. We'll be a banana republic before the jihadis can get us. There will never be another GOP president or Congressional majority. Importing voters for the socialists is as stupid as it gets.


McCain keeps saying "Secure the border first". We know that he means amnesty next. The plan is to get the border state Gov's to declare the border secure. Conveniently, they are all on board the cheap labor express. Then his good friend Ted Kennedy will bring back McCain/Kennedy and McCain can provide his good friends across the aisle with their new permanent majority.

I will not vote for amnesty.

A Vote For McCain=A Vote For Amnesty

Please do NOT stay home. You must vote. You do not have to vote for Hillybama or McAmnesty. There are always other parties and people on the ballot. You could write in Joe Oliva. The important votes are for House and Senate seats. Conservatives MUST win seats in the House. The House is where things get done. It was the passage of H.R. 4437, an enforcement bill, in Dec.05 that sparked the illegal alien protest marches and moved this issue to the front burner. It was the Senate that tried to jam amnesty down our throats. The D's that won seats in '06 were conservatives running on enforcement platforms. One of them, Heath Shuler D-NC, introduced the SAVE Act. Call, e-mail, or write your Congressman and urge support of this legislation. Enforcement is what Americans want, not amnesty.

Amnesty is a losing proposition.
I don't think Hillary is stupid enough to step in front of this bus.
McCain is.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.