Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Ken Blackwell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Newt Understands Conservatives
by Ken Blackwell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


While media the missed his grand statement, others did not.

In an open letter, the Rev. Jerry Falwell wrote, "I have been very impressed with the spiritual maturity of this man and am convinced that he has been honest and forthright in clarifying his past failings and his quest, as a Christian, for God's forgiveness."

Rev. Falwell went on to say, "I well remember the challenge we evangelicals faced in 1980 when our candidate, Ronald Reagan, was the first presidential candidate who had gone through a divorce. We wisely made allowance for God's forgiveness and America was the beneficiary of this historic champion."

Paul Weyrich of the Free Congress Foundation amplified Rev. Falwell's sentiment. He thinks social conservatives will embrace Gingrich and told the Wall Street Journal, "He says he has gone down on his knees to ask God's forgiveness for his weakness. Our people are very oriented toward accepting that."

Also, there has been little discussion of Gingrich's latest book, "Rediscovering God in America," which gives a scholarly review of the foundations of faith in our historic public square. The book is part of a grander conversation Gingrich is having with the American people. That conversation is continued at Newt.org where he states, "defending God in the public square," is the nation's second greatest challenge after defeating our enemies abroad.

I know, from personal experience, the yearning within the conservative base of the GOP for Gingrich's type of leadership. With undeniable fallibility on his path through life, he nonetheless acts like a man who knows where he is going and where the nation needs to be taken.

King Solomon said, "A good name is rather to be chosen than riches." Can Gingrich's good name among conservatives transfer into electoral riches? I don't know, but his understanding of the nation's essence -- devotion to God, traditional family and American nationalism -- makes Gingrich a potentially formidable presidential contender.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mr. Blackwell, a contributing editor at Townhall.com, is a senior fellow at the Family Research Council and American Civil Rights Union.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ken Blackwell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Liberty never ceases to amaze me
Liberty, I must give you praise for your wisdom and knowledge of the facts once again.
I wish we had a million like minded conservatives
with your dedication to preserving Liberty and the Rule of Law.
It seems no one cares or is too stupid to realize it's not the military that keeps us free it's Constitutional Rule of Law.
Rights derived by God and not men keep us free, militaries defend us.
Mr. Bush, the Constitution is more than just a GD piece of paper. It's the lifeblood of America and it's greatness.
I ask all true conservatives to support the candidates in 08 that respect the Rule of Law more than anything else, rather than the next political bandwagon to come down the pike.

For the "big government liberal, give up liberty for security, crowd" that seems to have infiltrated the Republican Party, security is this.

Security is being a lender nation not a debtor nation.
Security is being able to own assault weapons to protect you and your family from foreign and domestic enemies.
Security is having secure borders at home before
nation building in nations not our own.
Security is not being dependant on foreign countries, dictators, or drug cartels.
Security is not freaking out when it comes to the war on terror. Fear of islamofascist is not going to keep you safe one bit.

Security is using our wits during these troubling times and having a clear mind when it comes to the decision we make in fighting this war.

We definately need to rethink the way we handle the war on terror. We haven't even been able to catch the one even behind 9/11 yet.

Remember when your in the voting booth in 08 what Reagan said,... "the problem is government."
I would also add, government's lack of understanding the purposes and principles of The Constitution and the Rule of Law.

Newt is a member of the CFR
Council on Foreign Relations. This is NOT good, folks. Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney are also. By the way, so are the heads of most of the major media, not to mention many of the big newscasters you see on television.

This is something merry-go-boy has posted several times. It is an excerpt from Barry Goldwater's book, "With No Apologies":

Excerpts from Barry Goldwaters memoirs The following is from Barry Goldwaters: No Apologies...memoirs written dec.26,1979:

"In the Bible story of David and Goliath we are told that David’s brothers, who were older and bigger than he, ordered David to stay home while they went into the valley to confront the enemy. When David joined them a day or so later, they rebuked him. He replied with a question: “Is there not a cause?”

To my mind there is a cause. That cause is freedom. We stand in danger of losing that freedom- not to a foreign tyrant, but to those well intentioned but misguided elitist utopians who stubbornly refuse to profit from errors of the past.

If I am right, if the Republic is in danger, then time is short. I must take this opportunity to share what I have seen and experienced as a member of the U.S. Senate, as my party’s nominee for the presidency, as a man whose only aspiration has been to serve the cause of freedom.

If I am wrong, time will display my error and reprimand me. If what I say strikes a response in the hearts and minds of other Americans, perhaps they will enlist in the cause to keep our country strong and to restrain those who seek to diminish the importance and significance of the individual. (Page 14)

The Nonelected Rulers

I believe the Council on Foreign Relations and its ancillary elitist groups are indifferent to communism. They have no ideological anchors. In their pursuit of a new world order they are prepared to deal without prejudice with a communist state, a socialist state, a democratic state, monarchy, oligarchy—it’s all the same to them.

Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years, has written, “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common—they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States.” Their goal is to impose a benign stability on the quarreling family of nations through the merger and consolidation. They see the elimination of national boundaries, the suppression of racial and ethnic loyalties as the most expeditious avenue to world peace. Their rationale rests exclusively on materialism. They believe economic competition is the root cause of international tension. This approach dismisses as insignificant the form of government or the political ideology expressed by that form.

It may be that if the CFR vision of the future could be realized, there would be a reduction in wars, a lessening of poverty, a more efficient utilization of the world’s resources. To my mind, this would inevitably be accompanied by a loss of personal freedom of choice and the reestablishment of the restraints which provoked the American Revolution."

----------------------

Let's take a look at what the leadership of the CFR have openly said. Here are 2 examples.

Listen to what the President of the CFR wrote in 1974. The article is entitled, "The Hard Road to World Order".

“the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down ... an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19740401faessay10106/richard-n-gardner/the-hard-road-to-world-order.html

How about the current President, Richard Haas?
"State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era"

"In the age of globalization, states should give up some sovereignty to world bodies in order to protect their own interests"

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2006/02/21/2003294021

-------------

Sound good, folks? I hope not.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.