Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
Ken Blackwell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Second Amendment Freedoms Aided the Civil Rights Movement
by Ken Blackwell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Prominent and indispensable among our rights is the "right of the people to keep and bear arms." Second Amendment rights, never to be infringed, were posited by our nation’s founders as among the most essential tenets of the free and just republic they sought to establish.

The empowering freedom of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is particularly timely during Black History Month, for its role in the victory of civil rights for all is sorely overlooked.

As the nation reflects on the struggles and achievements of our African-American citizens, we must celebrate the actions of heroic civil rights activists known as the Deacons for Defense. In the fight for equality, these brave men utilized their right to bear arms to protect their families, possessions and liberties.

Unfortunately, these freedom fighters are seldom mentioned as an important part of African-American history.

Even prominent civil rights movement chronicler Taylor Branch gives the Deacons only passing mention in his three-volume work on the movement during the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. years.

In his 2004 book, The Deacons for Defense: Armed Resistance and the Civil Rights Movement, Tulane University history professor Lance Hill tells their story. Hill writes of how a group of southern working class black men advanced civil rights through direct action to protect members of local communities against harassment at schools and polling places, and to thwart the terror inflicted by the Ku Klux Klan. He argues that without the Deacon’s activities the civil rights movement may have come to a crashing halt.

The spring and summer of 1964 were landmark periods for civil rights. In growing numbers, Southerners marched against segregation. The battle over race lit Louisiana aflame. In response to civil rights activism, the Klan wreaked havoc on black neighborhoods, but soon found itself face-to-face with the Deacons.

Following a KKK night ride in Jonesboro, the Deacons approached the police chief who had led the parade and informed him that they were armed and unafraid of self-defense. The Klan never rode through Jonesboro again. Local cross burnings ceased when warning shots were fired as a Klansmen’s torch met a cross planted in front of a black minister’s home. The initial desegregation of Jonesboro High School was threatened by firemen who aimed hoses at black students attempting to enter the building. When four Deacons arrived and loaded their shotguns, the firemen left and the students entered unscathed. It was this series of efforts by the Deacons that caused the Klan to leave Jonesboro for good.

Similar work in Bogalusa, Louisiana drove the KKK out of that town as well, and led to a turning point in the civil rights movement. Acting as private citizens in lawful employment of their constitutional rights, the Deacons demonstrated the real social impact of the freedoms our nation’s founders held dear.

As legendary civil rights leader Roy Innis recently said to me, the Deacons forced the Klan to re-evaluate their actions and often change their undergarments.

Their actions in the mid 1960s had perhaps more impact on the progress of civil rights than did President Eisenhower’s 1957 dispatching of troops to Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas.

That gun rights have played such a pivotal role in racial equality makes the historical correlation between gun control and discriminatory policies unsurprising. From their beginnings, gun control measures have worked to create legal disparities, granting unequal rights to members of various socioeconomic groups.

In fact, restrictive gun laws have long been employed to the benefit of a select elite while circumscribing the liberty of populations less popular or less powerful.

Gun control measures, from the slave gun bans of the 1700s South to the Brady Bill regulations of the 1990s have unfairly targeted black Americans and have worked to curtail a disproportionate number of their constitutional rights. Access to firearms was understood by our founders and many early American jurists as an essential aspect of full US citizenship, and it was for this reason that the Black Codes established after the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment -- which constitutionally abolished slavery -- prevented black freemen from owning guns.

In prohibiting blacks from exercising the freedoms granted other Americans in the Second Amendment, the Black Codes emphasized the notion that African-Americans were not true citizens with full human rights. This point was raised by the Majority in Dred Scott v. Sanford in defense of the institution of slavery. By the 1870’s, preventing Blacks from having access to guns had become one of the primary goals of the Ku Klux Klan.

As Gun Owners of America President Larry Platt shared with me this summer and wrote in 2004 regarding the Deacons, the history of gun control appears to have been one of controlling people rather than reducing violence.

Examining both our nation’s constitution and the history of gun rights in America, the right to keep and bear arms has been at the forefront of our nation’s march to liberty and equality. The Second Amendment, which empowers Americans to embrace all of the freedoms and responsibilities their citizenship entails, has been the catalyst of tremendous social progress. While some may dismiss the centrality of gun ownership to “progressive” ideals, groups such as the Deacons for Defense have shown us that a citizenry understanding of their rights to bear arms is one likely to understand and defend our basic civil rights and the principles of equality and freedom.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mr. Blackwell, a contributing editor at Townhall.com, is a senior fellow at the Family Research Council and American Civil Rights Union.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ken Blackwell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
2nd Amendment Voices
Excellent article. Very few individuals or organizations speak articulately to the Founding Fathers REASONS for that amendment. That it was #2 indicates how important they thought it was that people be able to defend themselves from tryanny, regardless of the nature of said tryanny.

What most Americans fail to remember is, that our Founding Fathers were in the process of OVER-THROWING the LEGITIMATE government of time. (The British.) The Brits policies for governance had become to intrusive and taxing for about 1/3rd of the Americans to tolerate any longer. The FF were smart enough to envision that our own form of government might morph into something as bad.
(I believe we're almost there.) They put the 2nd A. in as a stop gap measure, so that in the event that our own government became too intrusive, we citizens would be able to re-invent our freedoms, by force of arms if necessary.
Amid all the modern sound-bites and rhetoric, their voices seem to get lost.

Excellent Article
This needs to be posted anywhere there is room to put it. Too many people have forgotten the true reason behind the 2nd Amendment, and the history of the gun control movement.

Armed America
The awesome book can be bought at:

http://www.conservativebookclub.com

GREAT BOOK and a primer on the 2nd Amendment.

An article about the 2nd Amendment
I love it, but I am curious as to how the modern gun control bills unfairly target blacks? My feeling is that they unfairly target everyone. Perhaps Mr. Blackwell is referring to the Supreme Court who has unfairly singled out the 2nd Amendment for non-incorporation into the States and who has failed to act to support the Amendment through all of these blatantly unconstitutional laws.

The failure of the Supremes really impacts people who live in the Northeast and some parts of California in urban areas where gun control laws are virtual prohibitions on gun ownership. Since there is a high concentration of blacks in these areas, maybe that is rhe “unfair” portion. I could support the non-incorporation if the Supremes still held to individual State’s enforcing laws not covered by the enumerated Federal powers, but they do not.

Not surprised
I'm not surprised that the Deacons for Defense are left out of many histories of the Civil Rights movement. That would undermine the concept of African-Americans as perpetual victims, needing the liberal hand for protection.

Lydia
It seems that Lydia has no knowledge of the history and background of the Second Amendment.

Instead of some off hand comment she could have gave her reasons for her comment. I would think she is not pro Second Amendment.

jevica
Reasons? You mean like argue with facts about this article? Geeze oh PETE!
I don't think you understand, jevica. Lydia and a couple of others come here as sheep in wolf's clothing. They are really Rush Limbaugh in drag and the purpose is to make us think that all liberal FEMALEs are simpletons who act purely on emotion and are incapable of logic. They have convinced me.

WHY ELSE ARE THEY HERE?!

Vic
I think it is the case that the most restrictive gun laws tend to be in areas that are mostly urban and where the population is mostly black (sorry, African-American). It's funny, however, that politicians who rail against the use of weapons for personal defense have no problem when it comes to their safety.

Dianne Feinstein (D-SF) had a concealed weapons permit she obtained in San Fran -- imagine you or me trying to get one there. I don't know if she still has it, but it demonstrates her hypocrisy.

The courts have ruled over and again that it is not the responsibility of the police to be our "first line of defense." If they don't respond to a 9-1-1 and you or your family is killed it's just too darn bad.

Whatever your race it is appropriate and your right to defend your family. Acquire a weapon you are comfortable with, find training in its use and practice, practice, practice. If you live in a state with enlightened carry laws take the training to get a concealed permit.

I don't fear law-abiding citizens with weapons. I do fear the idiots stashing guns they aren't qualified to use in "safe -- read drug -- houses" to be used in robbing/killing me and mine -- or you and yours.

The men in Deacons for Defense should be noted historically. I wonder how many are still alive? That would make a great follow up article.

Vic
As wolfpat pointed out, the history of the Deacon's goes against the Left's template.

Gun control is putting steel on target; not disarming law abiding citizens of a free republic.

stop by the blog (http:/dashofthought.townhall.com) for some more of the Left's templates...


Hmmmm
Haven't seen the ultra-libs crashing in yet. That could get interesting!

Second Amendment
Bullies, of whatever ilk, only prey on the weak. If you chose to portray yourself as weak, you will be bullied. The Deacons proved the universal truth. Portray yourself as strong and bullies will leave you alone. Whether in regard to people or nations, it is that simple.

Thank you Mr. Blackwell for a very important commetary.

Hey LD
C'mon guy, we need one of your great pieces to get this thread really going! It's got Civil Rights, guns, self defense -- all Lib touchpoints. Don't let us down now!

Thanks to Ken...
...for sharing the story of the Deacons. I had never heard about them before. They were obviously an important part of the civil rights movement, so I conclude that their story has been suppressed on purpose.

Gun Control
Yes, that's been my definition of gun control for a long time. A 2" group at 20 yards with a revolver and a 1/2" group at 100 yards with a rifle. My theory of gun restrictions is NONE. There should be NONE unless you have forfeited your rights through being thrown in jail for a valid crime. If I wish to go down and buy a machine gun I should be able to do it with impunity and without a special transfer tax.

Damn straight it did
Who do you think a klansman would rather lynch, an unarmed person or an armed person? It is common sense. Gun control's roots are based in racism. Gun taxes sought to keep arms out of the hands of poor blacks in the south. Look up a Saturday Night Special's original nickname and you can see that. Saturday Night Specials and other cheap guns were demonized because the poor could use them.

Though many can't tell by my posts on other threads but I think modern day liberalism is based on the same kind of thinking that spawned the "paternalistic" slavemaster, meaning that they thought slavery was necessary for the supposed "superior" race to take care of the supposed "inferior" race. It consists of one part racism, one part elitism, and one part compassion. That is why liberalism is a self contradictory. Now I am not saying all liberals or most liberals for that matter are racist, I am just saying that is where that superior "I can make better choices for you than you" way of thinking came from. This kind of thinking can also in the "well meaning" globalists and neocons as opposed to their bretheren, the "police state" globalists and the "genocidal" neocons.

correction
This kind of thinking can also BE FOUND in the "well meaning" globalists and neocons as opposed to their bretheren, the "police state" globalists and the "genocidal" neocons.

B-Rob....
Take those red states, and then look at the counties where the violence actually occurs. I guarantee they will be blue.... be it in Texas, Colorado, Missouri.... doesn't matter. The red areas have the lowest violent crime... period. Even in the blue states... it holds the same.

Where is the majority of violent crime in the blue state where I live? In the blue areas, of course.

It holds true:
"God created man, but Sam Colt made them equal."

Great article, Ken.

To B-Rob
The prevalence of violent crime has more to do with the prevalence of do-gooder liberal policies on crime than it does anything else. We did not start getting the massive increases in crime until the 1950s when the Warrent Court decided that criminals had more rights than citizens and liberals decided that poor toilet training was to blame for every ill in society.

B-Rob
You must have been educated in a government school. If it hadn't been for the Republicans it is unlikely that the filibuster of Robert (KKK) Byrd (D-WVa) against the 1964 Civil Rights bill would have been broken. Georgia Senator continued to rail against the bill while Senator Everett Dirkson rallied his GOP colleagues in support.

The Democrat party has consistently worked to keep the African-American population dependent on government (LBJ's Great Society) and lied about their support of civil rights. If it hadn't been for the conservatives nothing would have been passed, the Democrats would have killed it.

As for the relative crime stats, when you have massive amounts of drugs and illegal aliens moving across the border you're going to have problems. As an experiment, take a look at those cities and countries that have implemented strict gun control on their law abiding citizens. Great Britain recently admitted that gun crime has soared. Heck, they are prosecuting and imprisoning citizens who defend their lives against criminals breaking into their homes.

When someone breaks down your front door I hope you are comfortable kneeling down and convincing that person that your peaceable response should change his action -- Good Luck!

By the way, I live in a "will issue" state for concealed permits and the number of permit carriers convicted of illegal weapon use is less than .01%

Sorry
That should have read: Georgia Senator Richard Russell. Here's the link:

http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Civil_Rights_Filibuster_Ended.htm

One more thought
Holding a concealed weapons permit and carrying a weapon does not equate to wanting to shoot someone. No one I know wants to do that. I hope I never face that situation. But, I would rather deal with the trauma of having shot/killed an attacker than with the image of my wife or children lying dead from an attacker or having them have to deal with my death from an attacker.

Refreshing approach...
Somebody needs to get Mr. Blackwell a radio show!


Your perspective (and approach) is refreshing, Mr. Blackwell. I look forward to reading more in the future.

Why do libs hate the 2nd amendment ?
The same reason they LOVE to install things in other amendments that were never there: Anything that furthers a human beings ability to be a free and independent soverign, is anathema to their socialist,womb to the tomb tendencies of governance.

Conservative = Love of our human spirit as God intended us to be

Leftist = Hatred for the human spirit (and what is this "God" you speak of ?)

Great article!
Articles like this are long overdue. All the current mainstream media coverage of guns is anti-gun and biased. I will always applaud more people coming around to see the light in that vital document called the Constitution. It affects all of us, and the Second Amendment is no less (in fact, it's more) important than the other amendments. The terms "gun control" and "gun violence" have one thing in common--neither one of those phrases has ANYTHING to do with the first word ("gun"). They are about control and violence, respectively. Guns were never a part of the equation, but the power-hungry, tyrannical politicians have used them to gain more "___ control". And they enforce their tyranny how? With guns!

The movie has already been made
"I want to see Hollywood make a movie of this story!"

It isn't Hollywood, but I've made a movie which has a large segment on the right to arms, the civil right struggle, and the Deacons. See http://www.secondamendmentdocumentary.com .

A friend sent this to me.
And seems appropriate here. Are you Liberal or Conservative?


The answer can be found by posing the following question:

You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, an Islamic Terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, praises Allah, raises the knife, and charges at you. You are carrying a Glock Cal. 40, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.
What do you do?
_____________________________________________________

Liberals Answer:

Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!

Does the man look poor! Or oppressed?

Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to murder me?

Could we run away?

What does my wife think?

What about the kids?

Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand?

What does the law say about this situation?

Does the Glock have appropriate safety built into it?

Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children?

Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me?

Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me?

If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me?

Should I call 9-1-1?

Why is this street so deserted?

We need to raise taxes, have a paint and weed day and make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior.

This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some friends for few days and try to come to a consensus.

_____________________________________________________
Conservatives Answer:

BANG!





Goshawk
How about you hold him down while someone feeds him a BLT ?(minus the lettuce,tomato and bread course)

Lessons
As B-Rob (undoubtedly unwittingly) reminds us, terms like "Liberal" and "Conservative" are totally meaningless unless one specifies exactly what liberties are supported for whom, or what institutions and systems should be conserved and supported. JFK's economic and defense policies would clearly get him labeled as a "conservative" in today's political climate, while the greatest body of legislation and regulations expanding and protecting civil rights was enacted not under JFK or LBJ, but under that "arch-liberal", Richard Nixon.

B-Rob also has a regrettable tendency, all too common today, to confuse guns with violence. If anything, it was indeed violence that characterized the civil rights era; I remember well, having been on the Washington Mall in '63 and Alabama in '65 and '66. The Klan and their public supporters were always willing to engage in violence against peaceful activists, except for those instances where they were convinced that their violence would lead to more violence from the Deacons, the FBI and other armed defenders. If there's anything that bullies fear it's the possibility that someone will stand up to them. Meekness and "non-violence" simply encourage their violence; the last thing they want if for their violence to beget counter-violence.

Because the TRUTH about guns is
That just HAVING one deters crime. Did the Deacons SHOOT those guns - possibly, probably at least at first. A warning shot says a lot.

But, when everyone KNEW they WOULD SHOOT, they didn't have to. The same is true for most homeowners and parents (MANY women are training in guns now!) And that is another statistic the looney left doesn't want you to know. Most guns that ARE pulled, aren't shot. Many that are shot aren't used to kill (when used for defense.)

Great article and some long overdue credit for a job well done.

article
thank you for great article,worked for schools for 25 yrs. you will never see this in any school

A movie has been made on this story.
It's called Deacons for Defense, and it stars Forrest Whitaker.

I think it was either an HBO or Showtime production, but it's pretty damn good.

You can rent it from Blockbuster Online or Netflix. It's probably not in the bricks and mortar stores.

The current high bid on a copy of the DVD on ebay is 99 cents with $2 shipping. I have the DVD, and it is worth what you will pay on ebay for it.

And by the way--it is nothing short of amazing that this politically incorrect movie was even made. It simply obliterates the hype surrounding King's nonviolent tactics by showing that sometimes you simply have to rock and roll. King's Ghandiesque nonviolence was beautiful, and it provided the gas for needed social change. But no amount of nonviolence would deter the thugs about to run the black man off the road and string him up. Only superior firepower will do in such a situation.

It also makes a powerful case for the morality of armed self-defense. Not the best acting or directing, but still, better than a lot of the junk Hollywood puts out. If you want a side of the sixties you've been deliberately NOT told about. Get Deacons for Defense, and show it to your kids.

I hate to break it to you, but
"Holding a concealed weapons permit and carrying a weapon does not equate to wanting to shoot someone."

Holding a PERMIT is not the same as exercising a RIGHT. The fact that the government would require an application for approval is indication the government can deny, limit, or otherwise infringe upon the exercising of a right. There is a huge difference!

Rights as defined in the Decalaration of Independence are, "truths we hold to be self-evident and are endowed by their creator..."

These rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We have the right to keep AND bear arms to preserve our life (self-defense) liberty (government oppression) and the pursuit of happiness (our property).


To Goshawk
I heard the same joke, but the actors were Democrat, Republican and Libertarian, I think. The Libertarian empties the clip and must reload and empty the second clip. The children ask 'can I do it next time'?

The funny thing about those who hate the second amendment or try to cloud the actual intentions of it (it is for the National Guard, it is only for the Army, it is only valid on every 12th Wednesday during a leap year between the hours of 12:59-1:00PM) is that they choose their position on the historical side of those who didn't want any civil rights for black people. The party of Jim Crow and second class status for blacks and former slaves was the Democratic Party. The first elected blacks in the south were Republicans, and blacks were overwhelmingly Republicans. This is why the Democrats instituted laws like the literacy tests, and other unconstitutional ways to dissuade and intimidate black voters.

Among the first Presidents of the National Rifle Association were former Union Generals like Ulysses S. Grant and others (in 1883, Grant was elected the eighth president of the NRA). They supported the rights of blacks to own firearms and use them to defend their families.

More recently, during hurricane Katrina, blacks and others were disarmed at gunpoint by police and National Guard troops. This was when the only thing that protected homeowners and their property was their ownership of guns. All sorts of thugs and miscreants went on a looting spree, and the government was disarming the homeowners!

http://www.givethemback.com/

R-Bob
Please grow up and stop lying.

Racist Gun Laws
The "'Gun Control' Act of 1968", which banned inexpensive handguns ("Saturday Night Specials" in Orwellian Speak) was a racist piece of legislation that effectively prevented honest, poor people from procuring means by which to defend themselves. Who were the poor in 1968? In my town, they included a lot of black people. Why in 1968? Because black people were standing up for their civil rights.

ThinkAboutIt
A Dhimmicratic POTUS and a Dhimmicratic Congress/Senate passed that.

DC passed their Gun Ban in 1970 (Dhimmicrat Mayor) and have a cumulative murder rate of about 715% since then!

And here I thought that the Dhimmicrats looked after the little man and the poor...

Very Informative!
I have a hunch Mr. Blackwell is pretty dismayed as Ohio is apparently requiring some businesses to put a sign on their door that reads something like No Firearms Allowed Within, which translates into Attention Armed Robbers: Take us, We're Yours. I don't live in Ohio but pass through there, and always am upset to see that sign.

I never knew about the Deacons! Or I had forgotten. History was my worst subject in school. Thanks, Mr. Blackwell!

Gun rights have been deteriorating so much since the '60's that I doubt very much that today the Deacons could stay out of jail for 5 minutes. Bush and the Republicans have proven time and again that they are fiercely anti-gun. Look at the rogue jackboot BATFE behavior. They have not done anything about it. A few Congressional Republicans are slightly friendly towards gun rights; they stopped the renewal of the assault gun ban which Bush was eager to sign into law but never got a chance to, thank goodness, so they deserve credit for that. And, as governor of Texas Bush actually threw some crumbs to gun owners believe it or not.

But for the most part, other than Ron Paul, bless him, they are fiercely anti-gun.

Having said that, we are about to go from the frying pan into the fire. The new Democratic Congress is trying to unleash a new tsunami of gun laws, and if, God forbid, they pass I will not be a bit surprised if Bush signs them into law. Even if he vetoes, a new Democratic President is more than likely to sign any anti-gun law that comes down the pipe.

We the People must resist and there are numerous ways to do so. This letter will be taken down if I name them all, so I will simply say that support for the Libertarian Party's presidential nominee and candidates at all levels of government is a good start.

Or, alternatively, Ron Paul's bid for the White House is getting a lot of support and I think he is a fine candidate.

In any case, our God-given right to defend ourselves is far from intact. Once we lose that, we are done for.

See my blog: http://www.alicelillieandher.blogspot.com .

GunnyG
Yep. The 1968 Congress was Democrat, and scared of armed citizens, particularly if they were people of color. So Congress prevented a lot of honest people from defending themselves.

Mongo Accuses R-Bob of lying?
OK Mongo, specifically, where was the lie? Are you living in an alternate universe? Or are you suffering from the inability to separate drug induced psychosis from reality?

If you dispute R-Bob, try real hard to speak to the issue. You do remember what it is don’t you? When you speak to the issue, give some examples based in fact not feelings or emotions. I don’t think you can as I am inclined to conclude that R-Bob made some cogent points that he can support with facts.

Mongo Accuses R-Bob of lying?
OK Mongo, specifically, where was the lie? Are you living in an alternate universe? Or are you suffering from the inability to separate drug induced psychosis from reality?

If you dispute R-Bob, try real hard to speak to the issue. You do remember what it is don’t you? When you speak to the issue, give some examples based in fact not feelings or emotions. I don’t think you can as I am inclined to conclude that R-Bob made some cogent points that he can support with facts.

Gun Control is Racist?
I have seen several postings in this thread that make the statement that Gun Control laws are racist and/or have their history set in in racism. Come on people, grow up. Not every d*mn problem in this country is a result of racism or slavery or really has anything to do with blacks in general at all. The point of the article was that here was a case where the 2nd amendment did what it was intended to do; it helped defend the freedoms of people from oppressors.

Gun control traces it’s history back a lot further than this country. Since we are primarily an English Common Law country you can trace it back to the laws in England that prohibited common people from owning any weapons at all. In fact, before the American revolution it was unlawful for American commoners to own weapons; it just wasn’t enforced by the colony rulers. When the American “troubles” started the British began collecting the guns and powder. This is what brought about the second Amendment.

What started the illegal federal gun control laws in the US was Al Capone and his mass killing of the opposing gang on St. Valentines day. The Kennedy assassination added to it and then the Brady Bill added even more. If you wish to oppose the gun grabbers, I’m all for it, I’ll support you to the ends of the earth, but let’s not blame it on racists, ok?

Baby. Bathwater.
Wow Vic. I concede. Racism has never had an influence on any legislation in the entire history of our country. The fact that (black) slaves could not vote was certainly due to something, other than racism. Slavery had nothing to do with racism. It's impossible that racism could have played a role in any vote on any legislation ever passed by Congress. Just read the Congressional Record. No racist has ever been elected to office in the United States of America. Robert Byrd never belonged to the Klan. In fact, he was never elected to the Senate.

You can't ignore history.

Racism was a definite factor when the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed into law. It wasn't the only factor. But it was a major factor. I remember the debates. I remember the riots. I campaigned for open housing, and was astounded at the racism in my community. That experience made me a civil rights activist, and a pro 2nd Amendment advocate, all at the same time.

I agree that racism is often used in the wrong context, but when it exists, and is ignored, that is equally wrong.

To ThinkAboutIt
If you read slowly and very carefully you will see that the ONLY thing I discussed in my post was gun control. racism had nothing to do with the Guncontrol Act of 1968. Saturday Night specials were just another ploy by the gungrabbers to get their foot in the door, just like the so called "assault weapons" ban which was at the other end of the spectrum. If you really like open housing, then come down here to rural SC, its about as open as it can get.

Ain't Takin The Bait
I prefer the .22-250 to the .223 when it comes to long range shooting, out to 1000 yards, but the .308 beats 'em both, hands down.

2nd Amendment Primer
For an excellent read, which is mostly fiction, excepting it's history of U.S. gun laws and the court cases/circumstances surrounding them; get a copy of "Unintended Consequences.

It bears repeating...
It is worth repeating these well known but very apt quotes:

- Without a Second Amendment there wouldn't be a First.

- Guns are evil until the point that you actually need one.

- When you outlaw guns, then the only people who will have guns will be the outlaws.



Wonderful article!
Mr. Blackwell, I gladly voted for you, and will again when you run next, regardless the office! I want to thank you for your service to our state, your bravery in the face of the bullying liberal registration frauds and defense of our longtime record of bipartisan poll oversight. I hope your future takes you all the way to the White House some day, as you have proven yourself the most steadfast conservative in Ohio politics in my lifetime! Keep writing! I look forward to you keeping a high profile, and hope to see you on television as well.

Blue-State B-Rob
Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch... Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote !! The 2nd Amendment is the tie that binds the Bill of Rights together.. If not for the 2nd Amendment, there would be no Bill of Rights.. Period

B-Rob
"Violent crime rates are higher in Red
States. Just check the FBI stats. Look at the ten most violent states and the ten least violent states. 8 or 9 out of 10 Red (no pun intended) in the former catagory and predominately Blue in the latter."

Interesting. All of the available scientific studies have concluded that within the United States there is no positive correlation between gun ownership rates and rates of violent crime. Clearly you have a ground-breaking article to publish...

...if you can back up your assertions with specific examples and an actual source. Unfortunately, you and I both know you can't.

Gun ownership has been increasing steadily in the United States, but gun crime has been decreasing. Since Florida started the ball rolling back in '80 or '81, the states that have passed shall-issue laws on concealed carry permits have seen drops in most categories of violent crime, including murder.

Even Rossi & Wright, two well-know social science researchers who set out to prove that gun control really did reduce violent crime, found to their amazement that it really didn't. Research done with convicted criminals found that the thing they feared the most was a victim that turned out to be armed.

The United Kingdom and Australia both experienced dramatic increases in violent crime after banning some (Australia) or all (U.K.) handguns, and most other firearms. I think rapes are up 60% in the U.K., for example.

So if you can actually prove your assertion, you can set the social science world on its ear and become the darling of the news media. C'mon...let's hear the actual proof.

Reply To Ken Blackwell



"Second Amendment Freedoms Aided the Civil Rights Movement(KB)."
***


Yes, but William F. Buckley and the Conservative Movement did not aid the Civil Rights Movement!!!

statistic
B-Rob
"Violent crime rates are higher in Red
States. Just check the FBI stats. Look at the ten most violent states and the ten least violent states. 8 or 9 out of 10 Red (no pun intended) in the former catagory and predominately Blue in the latter."

Did you know that 99% of all automobile accidents involve cars with 4 wheels? Therefore wheels cause accidents!

You don't know what a statistical marker is, do you?

think!!!!!!
who was in office and in charge during Ruby Ridge. The supposed illegal weapons were not. What about Waco? Not republicans.

Why do Libunists hate the 2nd Amendment?
To enslave the masses of course. Much the same as their beloved Stalin and Hitler did. They first dis-armed the public before killing and enslaving them. The Libunists want to keep the African American population down and enslaved. Thus the push to eliminate the right to keep and bear arms.

Black Knight
Democratic Sen KKK Bryd, NOW THERE is a guy who aided the Civil Rights Movement in 1964 as did Sen Al Gore Sr.

Open your eyes B.K., liberals want the black vote to stay quiet no matter how much they screw you over.

Compare how many blacks were in Bush 41's admin. Who led the effort in the Gulf.

How many Blacks in Bubba Clinton's admin, other than Ron Brown who was murdered before he could testify on HUD excesses under Clintoon?

How many blacks are in senior posts under Bush 43?

Kinda sorta seems that the GOP is far and away the REAL leader in equality while the libs just pay lip service. Although they DO kot-tow to the two race hustlers Jesse "Love Child" Jackson and Al "Twanda Brawley" Sharpton.

NEConservative
Not to mention that 80 million LEGAL gun owners ain't about to knuckle under to Hitlary and her crowd of neo-commies.

Thoughts on the 2nd Amendment
Isn't it funny how the only amendment to the Constitution where the concept of "Original Intent" is argued is the 2nd Amendment? Imagine if we applied this concept to either the 1st or 4th Amendments?
Condaleeza Rice has mentioned the "Deacons" before. She has stated that if it hadn't been for them patrolling her neighborhood in 1960s Birmingham, AL, no telling what might have happened. The Klan were bullies of the first order and bullies can't stand either a fair fight.

I agree with Vic
There should be NO gun control laws. Period.

Great Work
I have read this article several times and it's one of the best I've seen on townhall! Keep up the great work.

Reply To GunnyG
"GunnyG writes: Friday, February, 09, 2007 9:51 AM
Black Knight
Democratic Sen KKK Bryd, NOW THERE is a guy who aided the Civil Rights Movement in 1964 as did Sen Al Gore Sr.

Open your eyes B.K., liberals want the black vote to stay quiet no matter how much they screw you over.

Compare how many blacks were in Bush 41's admin. Who led the effort in the Gulf.

How many Blacks in Bubba Clinton's admin, other than Ron Brown who was murdered before he could testify on HUD excesses under Clintoon?

How many blacks are in senior posts under Bush 43?

Kinda sorta seems that the GOP is far and away the REAL leader in equality while the libs just pay lip service. Although they DO kot-tow to the two race hustlers Jesse "Love Child" Jackson and Al "Twanda Brawley" Sharpton (GG)."
***


KKK Byrd is a conservative, as was Al Gore Sr.
***

I'm a Liberal. I'll vote for a conservative when the Pacific Ocean dries up.
***

Look at how many black presidents we've had.
***

Poverty decreased under Clinton, and rose under Reagan, Bush 41 and 43.
***

You tell us how many blacks are in senior positions under Bush. That's your question for your answer.
***

Yeah, RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!The GOP are the real leaders in equality, the Southern Strategy, Welfare Queens, Willie Horton, The Naked Lady Tennessee ad.

Give me a flying break!!!
***

The Dems have a Diversity of Culture, closely reflecting all of America, running for President, Hillary, Obama, Richardson, Edwards, men, women, Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites, while the Rupublicans have that old 1950s, return to the confederacy, lilly all-white candidates.

Same old GOP.
***

If you think that Jesse and Al are race hustlers, why don't you get rid of their hustle.

End racism now!!! And then they wouldn't have race to hustle.

.
BK, you are so far away from reality, it isnt even funny.

MY STORY!
HELLO, I LOVED THE ARTICLE. I LEARNED SO MUCH! I AM A RESIDENT OF CINCINNATI AND I NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME ABOUT 13 YEARS AGO. A FELONY THEFT, F4M5 I THINK! MY CONVICTION WAS NOWHERE VIOLENT, EVEN TRIED TO GET IT EXSPUNGED. I DID'NT QUALIFY, HAD SOME MISDERMEANOR TRESPASSING, THE JUDGE DENIED ME. I TRIED TO PURCHASE A FIREARM LEGALLY AND WAS REJECTED, AFTER THE REJECTION IS WHEN I TRIED FOR AN EXSPUNGEMENT! WELL NOW, I HAVE A DAUGHTER AND A FAMILY, I CANNOT OWN A FIREARM LEGALLY BECAUSE OF A MISTAKE I MADE AT A YOUNG AGE OF 20! I PAID RESTATUTION, STAYED OUT OF THE LAW'S HANDS FOR 12 TO 14 YEARS. DO I REALLY HAVE TO BE PUNISHED FOREVER NOW, CAN'T PROTECT MY FAMILY OR HOME! I WISH THE WOULD REALLY THINK ABOUT WHO THEY RESTRICT! THANXXX!!!

SORRY!
I MEANT I'VE BEEN CONVICTED 12 TO 14 YEARS AGO!
(A CORRECTION FOR "MY STORY")

Guns
If we were allowed to defend ourselves perhaps 9/11 wouldn’t have happened. If a good guy had a gun on the plane, it would have gone down different.
How about when I go to a bad neighborhood. I should have the right to carry a gun and defend myself from the criminals and thugs that have guns already illegally.

Guns are very important. The Revolutionary War could have never been fought with gun control.

-Seth
Every vote counts.. make sure yours does
http://ourvote.us
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.