Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Aphorism Drive
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



WASHINGTON -- Freud recognized that human beings have a sex drive and even a death drive. Is it possible that we also have an aphorism drive?

We do seem attracted to pat answers and pithy summations -- especially from our politicians. It isn't enough to be wise or effective; one must be quotable.

In fact, aphorism is the oldest written art form, according to aphorism expert and author James Geary ("The World in a Phrase: A Brief History of the Aphorism"). Before famed aphorists Mark Twain, Dorothy Parker and Woody Allen put the party in repartee, Buddha, Jesus and Muhammad were creating buzz. Five thousand years ago, the Egyptians and Chinese were chiseling out sturdy statements of universal truth.

Les bons mots tend to make us feel better, lending form to our thoughts and order to our emotions. They're especially useful in times of duress. Eulogies and editorials invariably feature those three little words: "As (fill in the blank) said."

Here comes one now: "We have nothing to fear but fear itself." Ahhhh. Feeling better already. Thus was born the Hallelujah Chorus.

Then again, more often these days, a politician's happy turn of phrase makes me feel worse. I don't know whether to clap my hands or clutch my wallet. Why does the very thing intended to make one feel uplifted and inspired make me feel manipulated and skeptical?

Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert, writing recently in the The New York Times, inadvertently may have offered a clue. He was explaining that people are happiest when they are certain. We don't like not knowing, apparently, even when what we know is awful.

Gilbert cited various experiments to make his point, including one involving the certifiably awful colostomy. People who knew their colostomies would be permanent were happier than people whose colostomies might someday be reversed. Gilbert's conclusion: People would rather know than not know. Knowing, they can make psychological adjustments.

"We find our bootstraps and tug," he wrote. "But we can't come to terms with circumstances whose terms we don't yet know."

Gilbert's observations were in the context of our current economic woes. As soon as we know how bad things are (or aren't), he said, we'll adapt and get along just fine.

He may be right as far as it goes, but the same uncertainty that makes human beings unhappy also stimulates the creativity that makes us happy. Was Leonardo da Vinci happy? Homer? George Washington? Man's drive to create isn't born of contentment, but of anxiety attached to the unconscious agitation that comes from the greatest certainty ever devised: Death.

Here is a truism, if not an aphorism. Without death and the certainty of physical finitude, Homo sapiens would never have left the cave. Unhappiness and uncertainty -- rather than happiness and certitude -- are what get us off our duffs. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
The Aphorism Drive
I was shocked and dismayed to read about Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert talking about the "certifiably awful colostomy." As an individual who underwent ostomy surgery in 1986 after battling Crohn's disease since her teen years, I feel this comment by a psychologist to be disturbing and insulting the those of us living happy, fulfilling and active lives with an ostomy.

I know of no other surgery that bears the brunt of cruel jokes and disgusting humor. Why I have to ask. Ostomy surgery is surrounded by secrecy, embarrassment, misinformation, and myths. Comments such as Daniel Gilbert's only serve to reinformce these stereotypes. In fact they make it worse, coming from a professional.

The media compounds these fears, stereotypes and myths by continuing to print these remarks, and does nothing to refute them so the endless cycle continues. Even a well respected physician made famous by a noted talk show host actually asked me "what's so interesting about ostomy surgery?" Those of us who have undergone this life saving surgical procedure have incredible stories to share with the public but we have an uphill battle trying to do that.

To Daniel Gilvert and his commnet about the certifiably awful colostomy-I say shame on you! What IS certifiably awful is choosing to die from colon cancer, bladder cancer or struggling with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, when a healthy, active,prodctive life is possible with an ostomy.

You gotta have guts when most of your guts are gone, Mr. Gilbert! Those of us living happy, health lives with an ostomy do...about 750,000 of us just in the United States alone!

Bring it on, Mr. Gilbert!

Lois Fink
Edmonds, WA

It must be the
"Lilly was patronizing anyone. To patronize
has the implication that one is trying to at
least pretend to give your argument or position
credence. I didn't notice any pretense of that
at all."

I am sure some combination of a good night's sleep on my part, or a few rewrites on yours, would render your comments more intelligible but at present I don't have the pleasure of understanding you. If this was intended as a zinger you will appreciate this necessarily diminishes its impact.

Since I didn't use the word "patronizing", and since it is by no means synonymous with the one I did, the value in discussing its meaning (real or imagined) more or less eludes me.

Moving along, my only point was if one is going to insist on repeating the mantra that conservatives are dumb, dumb, dumb (especially in the absence of supporting evidence or any pretense at logical rigour) one should at least do so with something approximating standard English. It kind of undercuts the argument when one sounds like one should be taking English and not teaching it.

Best wishes,

Mark

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.