Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Evolving Faith
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


"You can't arrive at that conclusion without throwing out all the evidence of the sciences," says Collins.

The problem of not believing in evolution as one might not believe in, say, goblins or flying pigs has repercussions beyond the obvious -- that the U.S. will continue to fall behind other nations in science education. Collins says many creationist-trained young people suffer an intense identity crisis when they leave home for college, only to discover that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. Talk about messing with your mind.

Collins says he hears from dozens of young people so afflicted. Most susceptible to crisis are children who have been home-schooled or who have attended Christian schools. Of all religious groups and denominations, evangelical Protestants are the most reluctant to embrace evolution. Their objections haven't changed much since Billy Sunday first articulated them almost 100 years ago and revolve around the fear that acceptance of evolution negates God.

To Collins, Darwin is a threat only if one thinks that God is an underachiever. Collins doesn't happen to believe that. His study of genes has led him to conclude that God is both outside of nature and outside of time. He's big, in other words. The idea that God would create the mechanism of evolution makes acceptable sense.

Now, if only he can convince his fellow Christians.

Through the foundation and Web site, Collins is hoping to help home-schoolers and other Christian educators come to grips with their scientific doubts. Among other projects, he intends to develop curricula that combine faith and science. He also hopes to help fundamentalist scientists see the error of their ways.

Whatever one's stripes or lack thereof, helping fundamentalists evolve can only be good for civilization -- a cause in which even the faithless can believe.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Joel-De Oppresso Liber - Part 2 of 2


Joel-De Oppresso Liber writes: “Do you have possesion of the ORIGIANAL scrolls that Moses wrote upon? Hmm? No?”


You *ARE* laying the foundation to reject ALL Scripture!

That’s good news, I like that argument.

When your question regarding translation “problems” cannot be credibly sustained, your back-up plan is to reject the underlying texts as well, unless someone can prove that they have the original scrolls used by Moses…

That is not a position that will long withstand scrutiny.

I’m curious though, are you consistent in applying this exact same standard, the requirement of the original autographs, to every other ancient text, before you will accept them as authentic?

Do you also require the original text written by Caesar, Plato, Tacitus, Pliny, Thucydides, Suetonius, Herodotus, Sophocles, Catullus, Euripides, Demosthenes, Aristotle, Aristophanes and Homer?

Without their original autographs, will you reject them too, thereby wiping out and effectively denying the majority of our knowledge about the ancient world?

Or will you employ selective hypocrisy, rejecting only the ancient texts containing the Word of God?



~~~



Joel-De Oppresso Liber writes: “Then don't accuse me of questioning God, or calling Him a liar.”


I did not accuse you of anything Joel, I asked a question to another person - but in the process, you appear to have accused and then convicted yourself, and now you are quite defensive about it.

It may not seem like it at the moment, but that is a good sign. It means your heart is not hardened against the truth of God’s Word.

Joel-De Oppresso Liber - Part 1 of 2


Joel-De Oppresso Liber: “No, I would never call God a liar. I call into question the correctness of the translation.”


Which translation, specifically, are you concerned about? If you are using a poor translation, there are better ones. If you are using a good translation, it is still imperfect, and where questions arise, we can go to the underlying original Koine Greek or Hebrew text, with the assistance of Lexicons and Concordances.

In the unlikely event that this proves insufficient to resolve a particular issue to your satisfaction, we can consult with linguistic specialists in Koine Greek, and in Hebrew and in ancient Aramaic if necessary.

If you have a question about the “correctness of the translation”, we can most assuredly resolve that question.


~~~


Joel-De Oppresso Liber: “Do you perfectly understand ancient Hebrew?”


No, I don’t perfectly understand ancient Hebrew, and fortunately for all of us, God does not require any such thing in order to understand His Word. Are you are laying the foundation for an argument that no translation is acceptable?

We have Scriptural example that translations of God’s Word are not only acceptable, but necessary.

Many Jews spoke Aramaic as their primary language when they returned from 70 years of Babylonian captivity. When the Law (of Moses) was read publicly by Ezra and the priests, they had to translate it for them, from Hebrew into Aramaic (see Nehemiah 8:1-12).

It was God’s intention that men read and understand His word, but there is no cause to think He expected everyone to become Hebrew and Koine Greek scholars in order to read the original texts in the original languages.

The truth contained in the Bible is the same, no matter what language it is in. Where legitimate issues or concerns arise regarding translations, we can go to the original Greek and Hebrew for clarification, and this works quite well.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.