Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Evolving Faith
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



KEY WEST, Fla. -- If only William Jennings Bryan had known Francis Collins.

Maybe Bryan, who died just five days after leading the prosecution in the Scopes monkey trial, might have lived longer if he had. Although he won the case, his sudden death suggests the proceedings, during which he was savaged by the press, may have taken a toll.

And, who knows? We might never have argued at all about whether evolution should be taught in public schools had Collins been around. Timing.

If Collins is not familiar, he should be. He is the physician-geneticist who led the Human Genome Project for the National Institutes of Health and is noted for his discoveries of disease genes. Alas, he came along about eight decades too late for Bryan. But he may have entered the zeitgeist just in time for thousands (millions?) of others who have trouble embracing both Darwin and God without, as Collins puts it, their brains exploding.

Collins, an evangelical Christian who was home-schooled until sixth grade, wants to raise the level of discourse about science and faith, and help fundamentalists -- both in science and religion -- see that the two can coexist. To that end, he created the BioLogos Foundation and last month launched a Web site -- BioLogos.org -- to advance an alternative to the extreme views that tend to dominate the debate.

Yes, he asserted to a room full of journalists gathered here, one can believe in both God and science. In fact, says Collins, the latter does more to prove the existence of a creator than not.

This doesn't mean that Collins falls in line with those promoting creation science or, more recently, intelligent design. He merely insists that belief in God doesn't preclude acceptance of evolution.

Though his own beliefs are firm, Collins understands doubt, skepticism, and even atheism. He was once an atheist himself, believing only in what science could prove. As a medical student, however, he stumbled upon questions to which science had no answers. In treating dying patients, he also began to wonder how he would approach his own death. Not with as much peace as his patients of faith did, he supposed.

Having earned a Ph.D. and a medical degree, Collins is nonetheless a scientist with little patience for those who insist that evolution is just a theory that one may take or leave. Most human genes, he points out, are similar to genes in other mammals, "which indicates a common ancestry."

Even so, a Gallup Poll found last year that 44 percent of Americans believe God created human beings in their present form within the last 10,000 years. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Joel-De Oppresso Liber - Part 2 of 2


Joel-De Oppresso Liber writes: “Do you have possesion of the ORIGIANAL scrolls that Moses wrote upon? Hmm? No?”


You *ARE* laying the foundation to reject ALL Scripture!

That’s good news, I like that argument.

When your question regarding translation “problems” cannot be credibly sustained, your back-up plan is to reject the underlying texts as well, unless someone can prove that they have the original scrolls used by Moses…

That is not a position that will long withstand scrutiny.

I’m curious though, are you consistent in applying this exact same standard, the requirement of the original autographs, to every other ancient text, before you will accept them as authentic?

Do you also require the original text written by Caesar, Plato, Tacitus, Pliny, Thucydides, Suetonius, Herodotus, Sophocles, Catullus, Euripides, Demosthenes, Aristotle, Aristophanes and Homer?

Without their original autographs, will you reject them too, thereby wiping out and effectively denying the majority of our knowledge about the ancient world?

Or will you employ selective hypocrisy, rejecting only the ancient texts containing the Word of God?



~~~



Joel-De Oppresso Liber writes: “Then don't accuse me of questioning God, or calling Him a liar.”


I did not accuse you of anything Joel, I asked a question to another person - but in the process, you appear to have accused and then convicted yourself, and now you are quite defensive about it.

It may not seem like it at the moment, but that is a good sign. It means your heart is not hardened against the truth of God’s Word.

Joel-De Oppresso Liber - Part 1 of 2


Joel-De Oppresso Liber: “No, I would never call God a liar. I call into question the correctness of the translation.”


Which translation, specifically, are you concerned about? If you are using a poor translation, there are better ones. If you are using a good translation, it is still imperfect, and where questions arise, we can go to the underlying original Koine Greek or Hebrew text, with the assistance of Lexicons and Concordances.

In the unlikely event that this proves insufficient to resolve a particular issue to your satisfaction, we can consult with linguistic specialists in Koine Greek, and in Hebrew and in ancient Aramaic if necessary.

If you have a question about the “correctness of the translation”, we can most assuredly resolve that question.


~~~


Joel-De Oppresso Liber: “Do you perfectly understand ancient Hebrew?”


No, I don’t perfectly understand ancient Hebrew, and fortunately for all of us, God does not require any such thing in order to understand His Word. Are you are laying the foundation for an argument that no translation is acceptable?

We have Scriptural example that translations of God’s Word are not only acceptable, but necessary.

Many Jews spoke Aramaic as their primary language when they returned from 70 years of Babylonian captivity. When the Law (of Moses) was read publicly by Ezra and the priests, they had to translate it for them, from Hebrew into Aramaic (see Nehemiah 8:1-12).

It was God’s intention that men read and understand His word, but there is no cause to think He expected everyone to become Hebrew and Koine Greek scholars in order to read the original texts in the original languages.

The truth contained in the Bible is the same, no matter what language it is in. Where legitimate issues or concerns arise regarding translations, we can go to the original Greek and Hebrew for clarification, and this works quite well.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.