Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Vying for the GOP
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



WASHINGTON -- When it comes to the six Republicans competing for lead dog of the GOP leadership, all are on point: They love Ronald Reagan, are pro-life, advocate small government, and promise more diversity and fewer taxes.

They are also, with one exception, locked and loaded -- armed in Second Amendment solidarity. During a 90-minute debate Monday at the National Press Club, only Michael Steele confessed to owning no guns.

Say what? In a race where Steele's conservative bona fides are already held in suspicion, did his admission unseal any deal? Can True Conservatives trust a man who doesn't pack heat, perchance to kill a moose?

The others admitted to owning several weapons, including Katon Dawson, the South Carolina Republican chairman, who said he had too many to count. In his defense, this is an honest answer from a native son of the South, where Labor Day is recognized primarily as the opening of dove season.

Chip Saltsman, who managed Mike Huckabee's presidential campaign, listed a bevy of beloveds with such specificity that one expected to hear nicknames.

The first-ever debate among contenders to chair the Republican National Committee attracted a standing-room crowd of more than 500. Imagine that many people showing up to hear six guys talk about the future of a party in the early stages of rigor mortis.

Then again, the new party leader, to be selected by the 168-member committee, will be the face of the Republicans during a new Democratic reign. By the choice of its chief spokesperson, the GOP will redefine itself. Or will it?

Will the new GOP stick to its guns? Will party leaders continue to cling to a base that no longer resonates with a growing majority of Americans?

Or, will Republicans recognize that the world has changed and that the fabled big tent needs to be more than a revival tent? Breath-holding not recommended, though it can produce a sensation of euphoria, often followed by glossolalia.

Looking at the panel of contestants, one can't help noticing that there are six men. But two -- Steele and Ken Blackwell -- are African-American. Steele is the telegenic, Fox-commentating, former lieutenant governor of Maryland, fondly remembered in some circles for his "Drill, baby, drill" speech at last summer's GOP convention.

Blackwell, former Ohio secretary of state and youngest-ever mayor of Cincinnati, is the social conservative's choice. (Read: Wholly owned subsidiary of the religious right.) He has also been endorsed by the College Republican National Committee. Other contestants include Michigan GOP Chair Saul Anuzis and Mike Duncan, the current RNC chair, who -- oddly and without irony -- is advocating "change."

All six men have something to recommend them, if not quite enough. Highly distilled, the upside-downside slate looks something like this:

Anuzis: Blue collar, former Teamster, beard (he brought it up in an interview), rides a Harley, straight shooter, knows how to deal. Downside: Beard.

Blackwell: African-American, smart, smooth. Downside: See religious right.

Dawson: Worked for Republican tactician Lee Atwater at age 14 and is perceived as an Atwater-Haley Barbour combo, ambitious, passionate, tireless. Downside: Before his death, Atwater apologized for his ruthless campaigning.

Duncan: Nice. Downside: Bush appointee.

Saltsman: Young (40), good communicator. Downside: Distributed that CD with the "Barack the Magic Negro" song.

Steele: African-American, celebrity, accomplished, mother was daughter of sharecropper (he brought it up). Downside: No guns and may harbor liberal thoughts.

All things considered, not a bad slate, but the devil is in the backroom where deals are made. As one longtime observer put it to me, this is the equivalent of electing a pope. He doesn't have to be a priest. But the College of Cardinals always elects one of its own.

Thus, the serious players are RNC members Duncan, Dawson and Anuzis. (Steele and Saltsman are former members, and Blackwell never belonged.)

Duncan's been-there, done-that status would seem to doom him, no matter how many times he holds up his 10-point plan, which could leave Anuzis and Dawson to face off in a North-South contest. Blue collar versus ... beige?

Anuzis worked his way through school while studying Newt Gingrich. Of Lithuanian descent, he learned to speak English at age 7 and would be the first first-generation American to serve as RNC chairman, if elected.

Dawson runs a family-owned auto parts business. And though a social conservative, his primary focus is on free markets and what Tammy the waitress down at the Lizard's Thicket, where Dawson goes for breakfast every morning, says she needs to feed her kids.

Perhaps it's time to resurrect the duel. Steele can call the shot.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
ogoodedy boogedy
I used to enjoy ms. Parker's works but she has began to annoy me of late. I am a republican but not very much of a christian. That will make Ms. parker very happy. I don't think christians are stupid or backward; they have faith in God above and that is not a bad thing. On the other hand, I do not approve of late term abortions unless the mother's health is in danger. I don't really approve of any abortion except in the case of danger to the mother. Given the availability of birth control I can't understand why any woman gets pregnanat without planning to be pregnant. I don't have much sympathy for those accidental pregnancies. I would tell the mother to "woman up" and raise the child rather than aborting a perfectly good human being. With or without God, life is precious and should be respected. Why is that so difficult for Ms. Parker to understand?

Not Today Kathleen
Kathleen is a prime example of what's wrong with today's GOP. She has no voice and she hasn't a clue. I would be suspect of any GOP'er inviting Ms. Parker over for wine and cheese. A bud and pig's feets - maybe but that's a BIG maybe. I refuse to let Ms. Parker tell me what I need to be thinking.

I still can't believe Townhall still run's her articles. You can read her hate at the WaPo.

Parker the obama liberal
Ms. Parker you have the intelligence of a Chatty Cathy doll. You're lack of intelligence is only exceded by you're hatred of Christians.

The Parker Problem
Yeah uh, Ms Parker. Lee had brain cancer you know. Lee was not himself when he said that and you know that.

That was pretty low, even for you. This is why Nancy Reagan kept her husband away from people like you in his final years. Nancy knew you people would pull something like you people pulled with Lee.

The man I presume you voted for in 1988 -- Michael Dukakis -- was in favor of keeping a program that let first degree murderers off on weekend furloughs.

The man Horton murdered was a 17 year boy by the name of Joseph Fournier. Horton killed Joe even after he gave him the money in his drawer.

People like Joe don't count for elites like you.

For the rest of us in fly over country, Joe counts. Joe counts big time.

Lee helped make sure that crazy Dukakis was not in a position to put such crazy legislation in at the federal level. Thanks to Lee, Dukakis didn’t appoint any federal judges.

God Bless Lee for holding Dukakis accountable. What Lee did was fair and just and not bit racist. Quite the contrary, it is elites like you that will take a despicable murderer and rapist and hold him up as a caricature of all Blacks.

Virtually all Black people in this country have more in common with Joe than with his cruel murderer. Shame on you.

Parker the Obama Supporter.
Seriously. You must be one of those uneducated conservative broads the liberals mention.

Nothing shows that social conservatives are bad people as you imply, No studies or polls conclude that the religious right turned moderates away from the GOP.

I do support Steele he is not liberal. He may not own guns but he supports the 2nd Amendment. No one says you have to own a gun to support gun rights. Bush was a fiscal liberal for big government, we supported his minor liberal flaws.

The GOP does not need to become social liberals. However, we need to bring in diversity and except other views. But, I am attacking your view because you make it sound like we lost because of Religious Right.

If you were a conservative why did you vote for Obama. Just because of Palin or lust for Obama. I understand why not to vote McCain because he is just as big of a Socialist as Obama. I agree the GOP needs to change but advice from an Obama supporter should not be first on our list.

Do you ?
Kathleen Parker do you read these comments? Do you actually believe we can't see what you are trying to do to the Republican party along with the other traitors, McCain, Graham, Collins, etc.
Just why do you claim to be a Republican? I see nothing in your remarks of late that come close to supporting the Grand Old Party. We gave in to your way and look where we are!!!!

Well...
The Kathleen Parkers of the world seem to have this idea that the GOP can treat social conservatives any way they want; after all, where will they go?

I suggest if the GOP follows her kind of advice, that we hold our noses for an election cycle or two, and vote Democratic. After all, why vote for a semi-liberal, when you can vote for the real thing?

When the GOP is down to 100 seats in the House and maybe 30 seats in the Senate, the Kathleen Parkers of the world may wake up.

Gregg...Sarah who?
Palin?It aint gonna happen!
Can't tell you why...just a gut feeling!
The next 4 years are going to be really
baddddd! But Palin, don't think so!?
I wouldn't be surprised to see a 3rd Party
get someone elected!Bad times opens minds!
That is how reagan got Elected !
I think we could use Sarah in the senate...
congress controls more than the prez.
Elvis

Bitter people
While Obama denounced religious conservatives (specifically those in Pennsylvania) as bitter people who hang on to religion, Kathleen is...What is she trying to do? The GOP is in trouble, but kicking the religious conservatives out of the party is not the answer.

whose side is she on ?
Hard to say with this line of thinking. Kathleen might I suggest you take hiatus from those you hang with and take a fishing trip with a couple right wingers. You know so you can maybe get beyond the daily propaganda and see that hey much like the Soviet citizen we're people just like you.

GOP Chair
Kathy, you are a bigot with a real problem with religion. You must hate our Founding Fathers (all men) for their insisting that God be woven throughout our Founding Documents. For that, you are to go straight to Hell (for a timeout, like children do.) You make a good Lib, seeing everyone as part of an identity group!
Sarah in 2012...

Rowly,mitt,nation
But 4 years is a long ways off and if this nation is as bad is I think it is going to be
there will be a search for a person with proven
problem solving abilities.(Mitt)
Reagan was laughed at as an actor but terrible times changed that..hmmm!
As for the GOP.....FORGET ABOUT IT(IMHO)!
HAVE A GOOD YEAR (if that is possible)!
Your Independent friend,
elvis

Ms Parker, are you not offended because.
... they are obviously ooggedy boogedy Christians too?

enough already
I get it, you guys don't like her, but isn't the point this to discuss the articles? Who will come here if everyone says the same thing?I can see she's hardly an advocate of Constitutional government a la Jefferson, but I want to engage in dialogue here. TO that point I am posting a link of something Jefferson had to say about Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. It is an understanding I echo, and that I see as foundational to Conservative thought. Please read,

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.asp

elvis
Elvis has never left the room for some of us. He was a beautiful man at one time in his life. I was not much of a fan in his heyday,but do like some of his songs now.

I remember when he came on the scene and I have been to Graceland and to the Sun Studio where he made his first recording.

Back to politics. I fear for our country for what both parties have done to our monetary system. We may never recover from that.

As for Obama's safety,he and Bush will be in danger. Bush from some on the left and Obama from any number of people for many reasons. Maybe even some on the extreme right.

As for Mitt. He would be savaged by the left and the unreligious. Just as Huckabee would have been. Some people do not want a religious person as a leader. He would be a good cabinet member in a Republican administration,though. (If we ever have one again).Take care.

I thought it was the weather,
I thought it was a bad day, I thought she was just jealous of Sarah, maybe it was hormones,but this takes the cast, the last straw.
Say What????

Is she seriously deriding American Citizens because they own a gun or two (or three, or too many to count)???

Kathleen, no checks for you. Zero Checks. One check is one check too many. You are no longer a conservative.

Bye Kathleen
Why don't you try for a position with your hero Obama? I don't bother reading your liberal views anymore. Why are you on townhall?

Bye Kathleen
I don't waste my time reading your liberal articles any more. I am so disappointed that you are still featured in townhall and in my local paper. Why don't you just serve on a committee with your hero Obama?

Rowly...ha ha ha ! OBAMA-GONER!
Iam laughing pretty hard! Hey,bro., your knowledge of the tunes are pretty good!
Do I soumd a little angry!?? smile!
I wish I could talk you know who from Mass.
into going independent like Ross Perot who didn't need the "permission" of some lame party
to run for pres. !
Always good reading your posts!Although some
folks can't handle the TROUBLE you give them !
Obama is now talking going after Social
Security but is he talking about going after
those absurd politicians pensions?
What, $50,000 a year after one term!?
Rowly, I honestly don't think Obama will make it through his term.As much as I am against him
I don't want him killed but there are many people who can't handle their anger in a civil manner !(LIKE ME..HA,HA,HA)
Bush really screwed up the GOP AND THE NATION
financially, of course the donkeys went along with it!
TCB...
ELVIS

Don't LIsten to Parker
The very last thing Republicans should do is listen to the mainstream media’s advice on leaders to pick. Republicans nominated the mainstream media’s favorite Republican for president and look where it got them. McCain was the darling of the liberal media until the moment he secured the nomination, then they turned on him like a pack of hyenas.

Mainstream media types like Parker are in the tank for Obama and will not be Republicans’ friend no matter what they do, so trying to please them is a complete waste of time and counterproductive. Their advice is worthless in any case, they seem to think Democrats can do no wrong and the only way to succeed is to become more like Democrats. Republicans should stick to their conservative principles, with a band of ultra hard-left fanatics running the show Democrats will shoot themselves in the head soon enough (it’s already happening) and then they will be totally discredited.

Ditz - please stop
When is this vapid ditz going to be given her walking papers from Townhall? Her writing style is at a high school level and her ideas seem as though she's just "mailing it in". I would much rather read someone like Camile Paglia who doesn't suffer from political Party confusion and has style and ideas instead of week old hash plopped onto a tray.

Dowdie-doodie
Dear Kathleen,
Have you been brunching with Maureen lately? I remember a long time ago, when you wrote about Dowd's confusion regarding her inability to attract the opposite sex (or maintain relationships)...but you seem to have developed one of her more unfortunate proclivities: sneering.

Dowd used to be amusing, too. Once-upon-a-time.

elvis.
Hush your mouth!! You don't sound like a 'Teddy Bear' and you've got a'Suspicious mind". Have ' A Little Less Conversation' at the 'Heartbreak Hotel' and you will be saying 'Love Me Tender'.

lead the gop...???
What is the GOP? Gobs Of Puke!?
I really don't care anymore...Like Ronald
Reagan said when asked why he left the
Democratic party...he said"they left me"!
Got the picture about the GOP?!
elvis

Another one lost to the Dark Side!
Poor Kathleen! She has gone the way of John McCain, Arlen Specter and many others. She is dissing the heart of the Republican party in the false hope that it will lure the brain dead from the left into our fold. It has NEVER worked and never will. Only true conservatives, social AND fiscal, have won mandates from the American people as Republicans. coalescing into pseudo-democrats will gain us nothing. We fight for our country and our values, a point of view apparently foreign to Ms. Parker

LOL...you crack me up....
Ms. Parker:

"Can True Conservatives trust a man who doesn't pack heat, perchance to kill a moose?"

Just can't get over Sarah Palin can you?......lol....Yep, Sarah is STILL cuter......lol...

Keep moving, Kathleen
Other than a few snarky remarks on the religious right, Kathleen's column disappointed me because she did not continue her clear move toward the liberal side. I've been cheering her on since she dissed Palin, but she didn't keep moving on.

She still doesn't really get conservatives, though. The last thing that conservatives should want is a Republican leadership that is NOT, as she put it, a "wholly owned subsidiary" of the religious right. Maybe that should be a "holy owned subsidiary." Anyway, the oint is that the religious right is the solid voting base of the Republican party. The party must get its leadership from this base, and avoid all RINOs, CINOs, or anything other than pure religious conservatives.

A truly conservative Republican party should have very strict admission requirements. Only heterosexual evangelicals need apply. And no pro-choice types, either, so the libertarians have to be purged. If a conservative majority can stay unified, it can turn the party into a truly right-wing party. If it wins elections, it should govern hard right as well.

Baseball Doc in Ref Bryce1
I agree with ur description of today's guvmint!

I think Bryce might give U a BIT of credit if he were to comprehend that The same *segment of the public* has been turning to the *government* for far too long, in my judgement..

The "Free Lunch" cannot go on forever and that will prove itself in due time..HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Just don't get it
Kathleen, I'm not sure if you were even serious, or just writing a piece for a lot of responses. I'm a conservative Christian. I want leaders that reflect my values, not my church membership. I don't want murders, cheats, philanderers... why would this be so offensive to you?
The law is clear on illegal aliens, and a vast majority of our citizens feel as I do on this. You had your perfect candidate this last election in McCain, and his straight talk express. Where did that get your republican party? Since this election proved you wrong, get out of our way and let the winners have a say again. Remember during Reagan, a president that had principals? He won against all odds, and we can do it again if we remember who we are, and also what we stand for.
Why are you writing in town hall again? I keep forgetting...

rebuttal
Frank-go pick up your welfare check and be quiet

John- it's like a gaggle of geese when a cat comes around they squak and attack and squak until the cat leaves.

ah geez
Please put "fine" between very and limits in earlier post.

BRYCE1
Hilarious! Look to the same entity to solve the problem that has created the problem. You seem to be saying that it's okay to governed by whim, rather than law. If there was a continual violation of the Constitution we would not have this mess. Not that FDR, was the only violator, but he set us down this road to destruction, and few have tried to stop the decline. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution puts very limits on Federal government spending. I echo Thomas Jefferson as he says here

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.asp

BRYCE 1 @ 2:59

.....I don't claim that Government is the sole problem (without it we have anarchy)...but when it gets too big and too powerful then it can be ...

.....It is true that people always turn to government in times of crisis and government takes advantage by increasing its power and citizens pay the price by giving up more of their liberty ...security for less liberty is the trade and apparently for many it is good enough ...many times it is the government that creates the crisis in the first place ...

.....If you read the Constituton the Power of the Federal Government was strictly limited ...if you look at the government today ...there is very little that is Constitutional ...so why not just trash it and end this charade of a Constitutional Republic? ...

.....I guess I am just a foolish dreamer that had hoped that this noble experiment conceived of by our founding fathers could have worked ...apparently it cannot .....COLOSSUS

PS
1) puh-leeze. Anyone who's OK w/ James Carville has no room to gripe about the late Lee Atwater. I fail to see where such an association should be a minus.

2) And, people "admit" to something they should be ashamed of, which category does not include gun ownership.

Oh, that's just Kathy, being herself
"Will the new GOP stick to its guns? Will party leaders continue to cling to a base that no longer resonates with a growing majority of Americans?"

The party leaders have since 1995 been clinging to a base that doesn't actually exist, much less resonate: alleged "independents" who want extreme-left policies but for some reason just a little less than the Dems offer. No one but the pop media (e.g. Wash. Post Writers' Group) & strategy-not-ideology oriented consultants & pundits profess belief in the existence of these fabulous animals. And no such critters have been actually observed in a voting booth voting Republican.

The alleged distinction b/t "social" conservative & "fiscal" is overblown, although some like Huckabee do seem lopsided. Conservatism is a comprehensive philosophy that entails a consistent package of social & fiscal principles.

The GOP has always done its best when it proclaimed conservatism (Reagan in 1980 & 1984, Contract w/ America in 1994), & lost most when it betrayed conservatism (e.g. GHWB tax hike, entitlement expansions & open borders under GWB) &/or pandered to the pop media, the "conventional wisdom," & these phantom Dem-lite-lovin' indies.

While it will take more than JUST a conservative RNC chair (e.g. conservative candidates & platforms), that would be a start.

If you were right about what the GOP needs, we'd instead now be dreading the inauguration of John McCain, who would have worn his hand out signing anything the Dem Congress sent him, & letting Reid & Pelosi pick his judge nominees. We did it your way, & got the predictable result.

As a pro-GOP, never mind conservative, pundit, you have zero credibility.

Frank @ VA
Without social conservatives the GOP has about as much chance as the Libertarians of ever electing another President.

Am I firing for effect?

Catty Kathy
I actually finished this condescending piece of trash. Talking down to lowly Republicans like she was some liberal...oh wait...that's just what she is.

NO MORE PARKER READING FOR ME
Kathleen:

I keep reading your articles in the hopes that I have misinterpreted some of your viewpoints. However, it appears I haven't gotten the wrong idea after all.

Social conservatism is one major aspect of the Republican Party and one of the reasons many of us are Republicans. Sacrificing our principles is one of the reasons the GOP now finds itself on a slippery slope. Perhaps instead of writing for Townhall, you might better served your obvious contempt for our conservative values by writing for another forum.

Subject: 5 stars
I am still amazed how these people who HATE
Kathleen still continue to read her. Every one of them proves her columns of the last couple months correct. Why do he people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA continue to hate people who do not agree with a set of Talking Points that have absolutely NOTHING to do with CONSERVATIVE/NON-CONSERVATIVE. Why do the people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA continue to hate EACH OTHER. Why is it freedom of speech as long as you agree with her. THIS IS WHY REPUBLICAN LOST

Subject: 5 stars
I am still amazed how these people who HATE
Kathleen still continue to read her. Every one of them proves her columns of the last couple months correct. Why do he people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA continue to hate people who do not agree with a set of Talking Points that have absolutely NOTHING to do with CONSERVATIVE/NON-CONSERVATIVE. Why do the people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA continue to hate EACH OTHER. Why is it freedom of speech as long as you agree with her. THIS IS WHY REPUBLICAN LOST

Silliness
1. Conservatives don't care whether Michael Steele owns a gun, only whether he respects the Constiution, including the Second Amendment, as it is actually written, which he does.

2. Ms. Parker and those of her ideological ilk got exactly what they wanted in a Republican nominee, an unprincipled milquetoast moderate, in John McCain, and Obama wiped the floor with him. The lesson to be learned is, therefore, the Republican Party needs to be less principled and more moderate??


BaseballDoc
Obviously the answer to your question as phrased is that the host dies.

But personally I would argue that the basic stance of the Right, government is the problem not the solution, presents an absolute that has no currency in today's political climate.

Like it or not, in times of crisis the public looks to government for solutions.

5 stars
thank you for continuing to target the true enemy of the GOP-the social conservatives and their far right religious toadies.

Remember Kathy you're going to get a lot of flack cause you're dead over the target and firing for effect.

social conservatives would much rather listen to the tiresome diatribe of say a coulter as opposed to a true journalist who isn't afriad so set the record straight with cold hard truth. Something the GOP needs mroe of these days.

Can you see
Conservative is got the momentum and has for sometime now. The voters are fed up with those that talk the words and do not walk the walk.

Should propose an impeachment process for the next elected RNC chair if they do not follow the principles.

So most of what you said is trash.

Poor Kathleen,

her envy has increased her vacuity.

Parker
I can see you are working hard to get yourself invited to one of Obama's inauguration cocktail parties. You take any chance you can get to attack social conservatives and evangelicals. A large majority of social conservatives and evangelicals are also free-market, capitalist, smaller government, reduced taxes, less-spending conservatives. So Katon Dawson is the norm more than an exception when it comes to social conservative values. But you take any chance you get in attacking social conservative values when opportunity presents itself. This is what elists do, put down others. But by doing this you have exposed yourself as a socialist, big-government, higher-taxes, increased spending Republican (code word: Democrat-Lite, RINO, elitist). We saw what has happen to the Republican party in the 2006 and 2008 elections when it adopted this philosophy. Your conclusion was that it is Sarah Palin's fault. Brilliant, insight!?

Your brilliant insight continues in choice of RNC chair. While each candidate pocess some great qualities, its highly unlikely a moderate blue-stater such as Anuzis or Steele, or Duncan have really any opportunity to win the RNC chair. It comes down to Blackwell, Dawson, or Saltsman. Out of these three, Blackwell has the most credibility with most factions of the Republican Party, a history of winning elections through using grassroots support. Though I know you hope a big, bad conservative doesn't become the RNC chair, your analysis with this race, as with Sarah Palin, is way off base and exposes your elitism once again.

Getting the Liberal View is OK But......
Townhall could provide liberal columnists with credibility and logical thought not this pathetic wannabe.


Best redading are the responses.
"Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group." Enough said.

I don't come to read KP but the comments about her. She still is practicing "journalistic distraction" as the Barry is about to be installed as #44.

My opinion is that we have moved into the age of fabulist. However, I believe my wife said it best. After watching the primary and election coverage, she simply expressed her passing opinion of the veteran news anchors/reporters across the board as “a bunch of enamored gloating young girls”.




Ms Parker's Diggs
Ms. Parker seems to almost take a certain glee in slamming anyone to her political or religious right. The GOP can't ditch evangelicals and other conservatives fast enough for her. It might be a little more understandable if she really knew her subject matter, but her ignorance in the matter is appalling.

KP - a sheep in wolf's clothing
You're clueless, Kathleen.

The Republican tent doesn't need to be moved or enlarged to include others. The show inside the tent needs to be improved so that people that have been coming to the tent for decades stop walking away. The moment that there is a show worth seeing inside the tent, the tent will be packed and there will be people lined up down the block waiting for their chance to get in.

You mock us with the capitalized moniker "True Conservatives," but the term isn't yours to redefine. Either you are conservative or you aren't. The meaning of the word won't change. You aren't, and as long as you continue to present yourself to your readers, your bosses, and your colleagues as such you are lying to the whole lot of them.

BRYCE 1

.....Why don't you get off the Dem vs Gop, class warfare rhetoric and answer a simple question? ...Post @ 9:46 ...


..."while the private sector is shrinking ...the public sector is growing ...what happens when the leech becomes bigger than the host?" .....COLOSSUS

Anne of SC
"I don't understand the team mentality here. The Republican party is not all right, and the Democrat party is not all wrong. Be a brave American. When the party you most strongly identify with is wrong, speak up and say so. Be brave, be a citizen whose first allegiance is to country, not party."


You don't seem to get it so let me explain it to you. Her viewpoint is no different as it comes straight from the left of this country. Since she is part of our party we are criticizing her and harshly so. Our allegiance is to our country since the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights. You are trying to split the baby in half. Learn the difference between justified and unjustified criticism, let alone what is considered constructive criticism. Opening your mouth for merely the sake of appearing to criticize both sides is without merit or brains.

You are no Solomon.

roadmaster
"I may be a member of the religious right, but KP is a closet member of the "religious" wrong - snotty, elitist and oh so superior to us hicks."


My sentiments exactly. I wish Kathleen would explain where any Conservative ever said that you can't support the 2nd amendment unless you own a gun.

Dump Parker
I personally think that Parker or Kos or Olberman or Chris Matthews or anyone else have the prefect right to their points of view. It's interesting to hear them but frankly it's up to me to decide if what I'm hearing is an "uncomfortable truth" or garbage.

What I'm concerned about is whether Townhall should give Parker a platform when they don't give one to Matthews, Olberman, Arianna Huffington, Al Franken, or Kos.

In my view Parker adds little to the issues that wouldn't be better articulated by Steven Colbert. Why is she still featured on Townhall?

Oh Kathleen
Please just shut up.

Vying for the GOP
Call me crazy but I read her atricle two time and still do not get her point? Does she say that the GOP is out of touch because they do not cave into Politically correct crap being crammed down our throats daily? Or does she mean that a party should give up on its morals, principles and our constitution because it gets you votes from the big states with large populations of minority, poor, UAW entitlement minded people who depend on the gov to to feed, bathe and doctor them? Or is she saying that the GOP needs to have a higher level of minorities? Typical of her columns to just spew out liberal attacks on the GOP with rambling rage.

Parker
Katty, it seems that early menopause has taken its toll on your mental health. Go seek geriatric help.

Why she bugs the Right
Because she does what Conservatives claim Coulter does with liberals, point out the uncomfortable truths they don't want to hear.

New voter registration for the GOP down 1 million voters, total lockout in the NE, ground lost everywhere else including the south, fewer women...this BEFORE Coulter's rant on single mothers...fewer Hispanics, fewer blacks, fewer young voters, fewer suburbanites, etc...

But why worry, you have the charming Ms. Coulter as the face of the conservative movement, and surely her sunny appeal will attract the independents the GOP so badly needs.


Amanda Carpenter -- Vying for the GOP
Ms. Carpenter left out the most important question: Where does each candidate stand on congressional term limits?

If there is one who honestly supports term limits, he should be chosen by acclamation.

If not, they had better find a seventh candidate,or the party is in a later stage of rigor mortis than the lady suggests.

Rense Johnson
Citizens for Term Limits

Oh So Social
It's painfully obvious that Ms. Parker wants a GOP that is socially acceptable to the urban trendy left crowd.
She is simply a political fashionista,as shown by her shallow punditry and odd obsession with Sarah Palin,whose significant list of accomplishments,in relation to her background,make credentialed white collar professional women feel inadequate by comparison.

The big tent idea is
about winning and power. Conducting government affairs so as to benefit the people is a game to be played to stay in power by these people who would expand the size of the tent just until they could win.
Sorry, Kathleen. I don't care who wants into the conservative tent but it will stay conservative. We aren't going to kick out our own just to win. We will win with our own.

Get rid of her
Can Townhall just cut to the chase and drop Parker? If I want to read drivel like this I'll go the the Huffington Post or Democrat Underground.

Dissenting voices should always be welcome among conservatives, but we shouldn't provide a platform for haters like Parker. Townhall doesn't feature Kos or Huffington as writers on Townhall...and Townhall shouldn't offer that platform to Parker.

Dump Parker. Let her to to the Huff Post.

What Exactly Do You Want, Kathleen?
Do you want Christian Conservatives to be quiet, vote GOP, and be satisfied or even grateful with what few crumbs get thrown our way? You have us confused with the Black supporters of the Democrat Party. If you use us to get in power, and then laugh at our agenda at your elitist cocktail parties as unsophisticated and old fashioned, we won't continue to vote for you.
We are not shrinking violets or abused women who keep apologizing for "forcing you to beat us."
When we came out of our churches in force in 1980, many Texas country club Republicans hated us so much, they switched parties rather than be identified with us. Didn't bother us at all. We created the Reagan Era, by joining a group of people who believed that if the Constitution doesn't "enumerate" a government interest, then the governing powers should stay out of our lives.
You don't want us now, no problem! But don't claim to be different than the Dem's, cause you're not. But instead of changing us back to an also ran Lib party, why don't YOU join the REAL Liberal party?

Dancing Bear #26
I stopped reading this insulting drivel half way through, stopped at 'revival tent' and didn't read the rest. I also take exception to this snotty attitude. The standard of these bigots is that if one uses a prayer language they have turned into mindless robots, something you and I know to be totally opposite.

I wonder if Kitty the Cat had her milk today, the way she gives digs at SARAH. Meow, Meow, Meow. I had a Queen cat years ago that would
take a swipe at your face if you dared look at her..should have called her Kathleen.

How many
glasses of wine do you consume before you come up with this nonsense?

Anti religious? No, Anti-Christian bigot
Is "the Religious Right" supposed to be some evil monolith? Granted unlike the Godless liberal cabals running around it actually makes principled stands which can be defended. Kathleen Parker, anti-Christian bigot.

What is WITH this woman Parker?
Get a grip woman. Take a pill, do something. You are in serious need of psychological diagnosis.

I can't help you, but I CAN pray for you.

The more Parker
writes, the more people seem to hate her. The more people hate her, the more bitter her writing becomes.

Hmmm? Does she have the same negative fan club that Peter J Wirs used to have a few months ago? Wirs got kicked off TH for "contract dispute" however after months of attacks by posters (and some historical evidence of fraud and manipulation by Wirs, along with some fake Republican trust foundation he set up to leech off unsuspecting visitors to his column) he was terminated off TH.

Is that the fate of KP or is she simply destined to continue down this path of single check mark columns entrenched in GOP bitterness?

Hey Kathleen
Keep up the bad work, the republicans don't need a bigger tent just a better one, one that takes the exact opposite position of Dems on every issue and then stick to their guns in lockstep.

GOP Fund Raising
If The GOP wants to fills its coffers to overflowing PDQ, it should offer life-size Kathleen Parker Cardboard Cutouts. These could be used for Target Practice, Dart Boards or to throw shoes at. WHY TownHall continues to post her is beyond me. It is TRULY a shame that you can’t flag columns as offensive.

600,000 MORE PARASITES AT THE TROUGH

.....When FDR became President in 1932 the Public Sector (Federal Government) was 2% of the GNP ...anyone care to guess what it is today? ...

.....The Public Sector has become a giant tick sucking the blood out of workers and Corporations who have become host to the government parasites who live off tax receipts and produce no wealth but only redistribute the wealth of business and ultimately the workers ...

.....Now Obama wants to add 600,000 more to the Public Dole, all unionized with guaranteed pensions down the road ...while the private sector is shrinking ...the public sector is growing ...what happens when the leech becomes bigger than the host? .....COLOSSUS

Parker
Parker lost her wits in a crap game some months ago. Possibly she is still here because she gives her column away for free? Just a thought. I, like most of you no longer read her drivel, but I do enjoy the comments on it, even the trolls. i do wish thee was a way to give a negative check mark though. By the way to None #31. Ann Coulter would not get into a battle of wits with an unarmed person. No sport in that.

bitter
The tone of your article is so bitter,,,um do you believe we have a right to own guns? In light of your attitude maybe you should do some soul searching, you don't sound like a republican any more.

Forget the Tent, I Want a Yurt
Small and compact, they travel light and are extremely practical. So should the Republican Party be: forget the tents. They provide corners for those with suspect motives in which to hide.

The GOP needs to forget about inclusiveness, that is an aspect of liberalism. I've written before that the GOP is a party of ideas, which we've forgotten or ignored. Specifically, small government, fiscal responsibility, strong defense (but not never-ending war), individual liberty and non-intervention in people's lives. The GOP abandoned those ideas in every election since 1994 when it won control of Congress. Instead of villifying conservatives, the GOP should rediscover what conservativism means.

Vying for the GOP
The downside for Ken Blackwell is the religious right? Let me get that right, because I have religious faith I am a downside!! I would rather be a downside and be known for having faith in something than a Rhino who has faith in NOTHING, as it appears is the stance of the author.

The religious right vote and are passionate about our votes. We study the issues and understand the ramifications of our vote. We don't just vote for a candidate who has an "R" beside their name which it appears is the way the author would like for us to approach voting. If she wishes to let about 20 to 40 million voters look elesewhere for a candidate then so be it. We don't have to vote republican! Her philosophy would ensure that the party is permanently relegated to third party status.

I only want the best chief for the RNC, someone who will support the philsophy of the party. Apparently from the author's recent writings (Sarah Palin attack)she would prefer to see a large portion of supporters look elsewhere for their candidate. And this lady is an editorial writer and respected member of the republican party???? No wonder the party is in disarray!!!

Is Jefferson available?
Please see what Jefferson had to say about Constitutionality, and then tell me why the GOP should expand it's tent.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.asp

There are many in this country who are tired of the lawlessness enacted and who amazingly know how to read, and have read the Constitution.

Stupid article
which seems to be Parker's penchant these days with her skewed views.

Until the GOP has a thorough house-cleaning and removes the rats from party positions, this party will continue to go down the tubes, a party with no vision quickly perishes.

We need a leader at the top post, not a politician. Duncan is history, or certainly shoud be, the fact that he's still running for the post tells of his arrogance.

Screw the member part, Steele and Blackwell are strong members, and since when being part of the religious right is a bad thing? Once again Parker's ignorance shines through. I like Anuzis too, we need someone with some serious punch.

Much Ado About Very Little
At the end of the day, the chairman of the RNC is only one piece of a much bigger problem. The bigger part of the problem, after all, is that the GOP ("The Party") has repeatedly stated it's talking points - but the politicians elected under the GOP's banner just as routinely ignore them. So, the "party" can write all the position papers it wants, but the "talk" produced by the GOP is not translated into "action". It "talks the talk" - but many of those politicians who claim to be a part of the GOP rarely "walk the walk".

If the chairman had the "power" to enforce the positions laid out by the GOP on the politicians who run under it's banner - this would all have some meaning. But they don't - or won't.

So, this all becomes much ado about very little. The GOP will constantly proclaim the virtures of "conservative" thought, while glossing over the fact that the current "big tent" philosophy includes many who don't subscribe or practice it.

There's no mystery to what has happened to the GOP. It needed fiscal small government conservatives just as it needed social conservatives.

But, over the last 8 years, the GOP in Congress and Bush through the fiscal small government conservatives under the bus. And so now, with the exception of the social conservatives, the rest view the GOP with the same disdain that they view the Democrats. And, since the Social Conservatives routinely support socially conservative candidates who are not fiscal small government conservatives, they've parted ways.

AC v. KP
Wouldn't you just love to see Ann Coulter and Kathleen Parker debate the issues? Substance v.
froth? Logic v. emotion? Fire v. elitist bore? Conservative v. liberal? What a hoot!!

Miss Parker's Obsession
Remember the series, "The Pretender," in which Miss Parker must find Jarod no matter what the cost? Real life duplicates fiction as Columnist Parker obsessively pursues Sarah Palin and neglects the real hero or villain, depending on where you come from, Barack Obama.

Not Interested...
In anything Ms. Parker has to say, about anything.

Why Then They Would Be Republicans!
A few years ago while having dinner with a husband and wife legal team who were hard corps Democrat activists I was asked what would it take for bring working class whites back to the Democrat Party. My response was that if the Democrats would give up their preoccupation with disarming the American people, end racial quotas, and become more friendly with small business owners they could make significant inroads in the base of the Republican Party. Their response was one of abject horror when they gasped "why then they would become Republicans".

Kathleen, if your vision for the Republican Party is based on firearms confiscation, compassionate quotas, and big government that make them......?

Of course ...
... leftists like Kathleen Parker want to see the social conservative side of the GOP cut off. That way, Republicans will never win another election as the social conservatives will stay home on election day and her beloved socialist Dems will grab more control over the nation.

We tried to put up a moderate candidate for President and we tried using moderate voices in Congress. The result was major losses in 2006 and 2008.

Why are the moderates/liberals constantly suggesting a strategy that is proven not to work?

Wasted time on KP, zero rating
But loved and agreed with Pistol and Nickels' critiques.

Catty is very much the darling of the Georgetown cocktail party set. I'll bet she's got all the liberals hovering around, waiting for her next put down of cons/repubs, and then laughing heartily together.

I may be a member of the religious right, but KP is a closet member of the "religious" wrong - snotty, elitist and oh so superior to us hicks.

I've got some news for you KP - the R's went down in flames because they tried to please everybody, put up a big tent like you wanted, but couldn't fill it because they watered down the Reagan and conservative principals until they stood for nothing but dem-lite.

I know you are ashamed of us, but I pray for you anyway and hope you go to Kos or Huff soon where they'll surely love you for the two faced beeitch you are.

Unnecessary Hotility to Religion
Unlike some of the other posters, I have no problem with this column being published under the Townhall umbrella. Vigorous debate among ourselves is what separates Conservatives from Liberals. To insist that she not be "allowed" to publish here is the same sentiment that Liberals express.

Having said that, Parker's attitude toward religion is destructive and divisive. America is still a church-going nation, and religion/social conservatism is one major aspect of the Republican party that could appeal to black voters. Parker seeems to be eager for Republicans to become more like Democrats in order to win -- or try to win -- elections. Sacrificing its principles is what has caused the current problems for the Republican party.

I refuse to read
this article or any other articles townhall feels should be placed on this thread by Parker. Just thought I'd stop by to warn readers not to waste their time. Happy New Year!

glossolalia?
Yes, Kathleen owns a dictionary and like Bill O'Reilly can use it to enlighten us all.

Definition of glossolalia:

Is a repetitive nonmeaningful speech (especially that associated with a trance state or religious fervor)

Kathleen's agenda
Like the "African American" vote to the Democrats, the social conservative votes to the Republicans are the base which forms the largest core constituency of the party. Without the Black vote the Democrats would never win another election. The math just doesn't work out.

Clearly what this Quizling, Kathleen Parker has been sent here to do is try and dumb down the readers of this site enough so the Conservatives consider committing demograhic suicide by estranging our largest demographic base.

That is the reason Sarah Palin was the target of such bile from Kathleen and other liberals like her, she clearly represented the ability to both attract the social conservatives and lead the other segments of the Republican Party to victory in future elections.

Listen to Kathleen Parker and understand her motivation. She is here for a reason not just to bore us, but to betray us.

Sometimes one can only say:
what an idiot. Since anything else about an author provides more dignity than the piece deserves. And I love this little piece of nonbigotry from our wanna be liberal "Republican": " . . .revival tent? Breath-holding not recommended, though it can produce a sensation of euphoria, often followed by glossolalia."

Thanks for the gratuitous sarcasm about my religion, Lady. Go find yourself another little affirmative action train.

A pox on all their houses
Why is this drivel being published on a conservative website? Article translation ...all six candidates suck.I'm offended that Townhall tolerates this waste of their readers time.

Are you still here?
I didn't bother readingg your drivel because it will always be drivel.

I do have to ask why you are still here and not in a mental institution as you are the WORST writer on TH.

Get another job!

Kathy's first French lesson:
Cher Chienne,
Mangez merde et mortez lentement!!!

-Ray
NRA Life Member
Soli Deo Gloria!!

Jim
news for you. We've been a secular society since the late 50's.

Who is proposing the repeal of the 2nd amendment? Their name please? Who has proposed this legislation?



Saul Anuzis Kathy's Man
Can't beat Stabenow or Grandholm in failed Michigan. Sounds like a winner to me. Right up your alley with your failed ideas Kathy.

Harley rider - he da MAN
Anuzis, beard, guns, A BIKER? Harley to boot. Got my vote.

Hey folks, has anybody noted the newly minted coins being foisted on AMERICA? If I don't miss my guess, not one of them has "In God We Trust."

Just a thought! Secular society here we are!

Next, shred the Constitution. Wonder how long it will take? Second Amendment is in the cross-hairs. First Amendment is already typed up (the rewritten portion).

Yep, while we dither away with glossy platitudes, our USofA is being sold down the drain.

We will soon be in trenches, fighting the good fight with our political foes...LOCK AND LOAD.

Tripe
Yet another breathy load of inside-the-beltway conventional wisdom, lightly seasoned with faux southernisms and the usual shopworn cheap shots. Townhall's low-rent Peggy Noonan clone once again does...whatever the heck it is she thinks she is doing.

KP
another 5 star essay!!!
You have accurately described the current state of the Republican party. You were ahead of the curve with your honest assessment of Sarah Palin. Republicans are beginning to heed your message. The cons will follow suit, too!

Keep up the good work!

The stooge is back again
Kathleen Parker does not get it. She does not understand that it is not about “religious right’ (an invention of the Left so naïve republicans can be ashamed of themselves). It is about reclaiming the true values that made American great.

Which are those values? The first and most important a real and firm faith in the Creator, the God of the Bible. Second, small government and fiscal responsibility; third, support for our armed forces, and fourth, the protection of our borders.

Parker as well as the cynics in the Republican Party mocks the idea that Christianity is essential for the healing of our country. They want a “secular” party that resembles the soulless Democrat party.

Again, her idiotic idea that religion is the real culprit of the defeat of Republicans to Hussein Soetoro Company is wrong. Republicans lost because they lacked integrity, moral conviction, and conservative support.

That this Parker voted for Soetoro is not a secret, after all what else we can expect from someone who sees not virtue in a woman who love their family and decided not to abort her baby, even though was diagnosed with Down syndrome. What else we can expect from someone who does not value faith and sacrifice for America?

Parker needs to apologize publicly her unfair attacks to a decent and great woman as Sarah Palin; otherwise she will never be in peace with herself. She will be always a stooge.

Sooo Tired.
Transparent also. Her picque at Sarah Palin continues to simmer just below the surface, hence her swipe at Steele (3rd) paragraph about killing a moose. She's tired, lazy and obviously crushed that real men, i.e., Republican, gun-owning, God-fearing, ruggedly individualistic and strong, find the qualities and values found in a woman like Sarah Palin so entrancing. Kathleen, you really ought to try being a real woman for a change. As it is, you're not just a fainting violet, rather you're wilting. You're not a pretty sight (or read) anymore.

2
I didn't give her a 1 because she serves a useful purpose. Except possibly for Wobbie the Wranger, she is the perfact example one someone who claims to be a conservative, but sneers at all things and people conservative.

To be a political force, conservatives need ALL the folks who for ANY reason lean to the right. We need religious fundamentalists, social conservatives, fiscal conservatives, 2nd amendment conservatives, school choice conservatives, Pro-life conservatives. These groups are criticized by people who will never vote conservative under any circumstances. We don't need Parker to say anyone who doesn't vote Republican for the same reasons she does/might? is persona non grata.

As for why she is here, maybe she put Katherine Grahm onto a good hair dresser or something.

Why?
I come to Townhall everyday to read the various commentators. I'm always so disappointed when yet again, I see Kathleen Parker published at this site.

Why is she still allowed to publish her nonsense here? How can we get rid of her?

Has anyone officially from townhall.com ever addressed this issue?


Chris Mathews
For a conservative, no for anyone to be in proxsimity to Chris Mathews seems to make them luny.

Pat Buchanan has suffered a large percentage of reasoning loss due to his association with Mathews also.

Maybe Mathews will leave TV to run for the senate giving Pat and Kath a shot at recovery.

a woman scorned
Kat is still mad and hurt for all the criticism she received about her Palin artcle. As payback, she favored Hussein Obama and is making snide remarks at religious conservatives, or just conservatives in general. Since she has such thin skin, and is clearly loved by ultra-liberals, she might as well go over to the dark side. Bon voyage.

Go Away Kathleen.
Why is you still here? This clever little article seeks to evoke tut-tut chuckles from your Washington cocktail circuit friends, but you are no friend of average-everyday Americans.

You are an elitist bore, Kathleen. Oooo, did you all get the, "penchance to kill a moose" quip? Such a clever and subtle slight aimed at Gov. Palin.

Get lost, already!

....................
-----Say what? In a race where Steele's conservative bona fides are already held in suspicion, did his admission unseal any deal? Can True Conservatives trust a man who doesn't pack heat, perchance to kill a moose?-------

Why is this intellectual pygmy allowed to post her vacuous drivel here? She's an airhead; perfect for huffington post.

Grill, baby, grill
This is a tough one. It doesn't sound like any of these men are particularly visionary. A very large part of the problem here is that they have been forced to suck up ridiculously to the evangelicals, a la Morton Blackwell's are-you-committed-to-theocracy questionnaire, so it is hard to get a read on their true priorities.

Hopefully the committee members will let their better angels, no pun intended, guide them to look for evidence that a candidate will subordinate their social conservativism to the limited Constitutional government ideological framework of the Party. They should also observe that a candidate prioritizes free markets and has a clear idea of what that means and what actions must follow from it.

If none of them can do this, then on the maxim of first doing no harm, they should leave the current chair in there for the time being.

Nice summary
Not sure why everyone is so mad at you, Kathleen. The GOP needs a good shaking up, IMO.

I agree that the GOP needs to put the social conservatives back in their place as simply one part of a broader coalition.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.