Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, November 14, 2008
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Summers Break
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Fresh ire aimed at former Harvard University President Larry Summers prompts the question: Shouldn't there be a statute of limitations on dumb things expressed in public?

(Please say yes.)

Forever accursed is the economist and Clinton-era treasury secretary for having raised -- more than three years ago -- the eensy-weensy possibility that innate differences between men and women might explain in part why more men than women reach the top echelons in math and science.

His comments, though not completely without scientific basis, unleashed a millennium worth of female scorn, making Hell a suddenly attractive destination for the discriminating traveler in search of cooler climes.

Research pointing to male-female differences that could partly explain different career outcomes is available to anyone in search of clues to the gender universe. But let's not go there. The social construct versus hard-wiring debate will continue unabated until the last woman utters: "No, honey, you stay in bed. I'll go see what that noise was."

For these purposes, let's stipulate that Summers said a dumb thing. He didn't, really. Provocative, yes, but it was a question about theory, not an assertion of belief. Impolitic? Without question. Still, we'll call it dumb.

Should said offense forevermore disqualify Summers from public service? Or even public appearances?

Summers was driven out of Harvard following his remarks. In September 2007, he was dropped as the keynote speaker at a University of California Board of Regents meeting when a female professor circulated a petition to have his invitation withdrawn.

Now, feminists have begun raising objections over speculation he might be considered for a second term as treasury secretary. Kim Gandy, National Organization for Women president, expressed her concerns to the Huffington Post. Gandy acknowledged that Summers is a smart guy on economics, but wondered whether his perceived bias would preclude women being hired within the department. That seems a stretch.

There may be compelling reasons to appoint someone other than Summers, but his having said something dumb -- or at least unpopular -- once upon a time shouldn't be one of them.

According to Financial Times business commentator John Gapper, Summers is "genuinely an inventive and original thinker and there are precious few of those." No mention of people skills, but haven't we had enough of hiring people according to their beer-a-bility?

What say we call a moratorium on punitive measures for dumb things uttered while in the commission of "good stuff?"

Many would benefit from such a moratorium. A few that come to mind: Howard "Arrrrrggggggg!!!!!" Dean; John "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it" Kerry; Andrew "He's (Bill Clinton's) probably gone with more black women than Barack" Young.

The stainless steel-tongued Joe Biden gets his own page. Make that a booklet.

Even Obama should get a pass for once saying he had campaigned in all 57 states with one to go, a mental detour interpreted by fevered minds on the right as proof that he's a secret Muslim. (There are -- aha! -- 57 member states in the Organization of the Islamic Conference.)

One small slip, repeated and amplified, can have serious consequences. A new Beliefnet.com exit poll found that half of McCain voters think Obama is or was a Muslim, with 32 percent saying, "He used to be Muslim and still has too many connections to Islam."

Although Republicans, led by the renowned neologist George W. Bush, are doubtless equally guilty of foot-in-mouth incursions (Trent Lott's infamous birthday paean to Strom Thurmond comes to mind), the GOP might benefit as much from an Adultery & Wide Stance Amnesty Act.

Given all the words uttered in the course of a presidential campaign, some are going to be screamingly funny; others ridiculous; some embarrassing and still others painful.

Covering all of the above, Biden, speaking to the Columbia, S.C., Rotary Club, all but boasted: "Hey, I'm from a slave state, too!"

Well, dang, Bubba, why didn't you say so in the first place?! At the risk of a too-brisk segue, sometimes intelligent, thoughtful, talented people simply step in it. And though some misstatements are too delicious to ignore, there really ought to be a point at which good outweighs bad; when smart outpaces stupid.

When even a screamer like Dean, who as Democratic National Committee chair rebuilt his party in all 57 states to run Republicans out of Washington last week, ought to be remembered best for the latter.

Make that all 50 states.

And give Summers a break.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Concede that saying true things is dumb?
I've taken up for KP somewhat in recent weeks, but after reading this column have to ask:

Why would you concede that it is stupid to say something that is scientifically true, simply because it offends those on the political left?

There is NOTHING that those on the left refrain from saying because it offends me or my conservative friends - can anyone provide an example of an instance where I'm wrong?

I'm all for forgiving people (on both sides of the political aisle) for their gaffes, but why would anyone agree that what Summers said was a gaffe?

Once you start down the road of agreeing not to speak the truth, you'll be backed further and further into a corner by the bullies of political correctness - until, one day, both your convictions and verifiable scientific truths will become prohibited 'hate speech.'

People seem to view political correctness as some sort of an eye-rollingly silly phenomenon that provides us with amusing or irritating anecdotes. This term came into use in the Stalinist-era USSR, however - people were put to death for saying things that weren't 'politically correct.' Why anyone would consider this concept benign or harmless is beyond me. That we would allow the left to limit our speech to include only beliefs and nomenclature that they agree with and approve of is a dangerous and deadly serious trend.

Be polite, avoid unnecessarily inflammatory language, and learn to make well-reasoned arguments - but NEVER agree that verifiable truths or traditional American values ought to be stricken from public discourse to be 'polite' - or in an effort to appease our ideological adversaries.

The left can never be appeased, it makes no reciprocal effort to avoid offending us, and avoiding the truth under the guise of being polite is either foolish or cowardly.

It's time to play, "Find the Logic"
Hello everyone and welcome back to, "Find the Logic". This weeks contestant, and longest running winner of Americas' favorite nonsensical gameshow, Kathleen Parker, has been working all week on the following gem: "For these purposes, let's stipulate that Summers said a dumb thing. He didn't, really. Provocative, yes, but it was a question about theory, not an assertion of belief. Impolitic? Without question. Still, we'll call it dumb."

Okay America, it's time to, "FIND THE LOGIC!" in that murky mess of a "concept", or, "ideas" stated by Ms. Parker....

(narrators' voice of documentary done years later) "...As Ms. Parkers' never ending stream of unbeatable doofusisms continued, the producers of the "going in the tank with a bullet" former hit show came to the inescapable conclusion they would have to "Howard Beale" this crazy chick. So, at the beginning of her four hundred and thirty second (and last) consecutive appearance on the winners throne, it was to be that "Reality TV" would attain a new, and in full HD clarity, level of credibility as it ushered in "The Fatality Hour"...


The guy who just did the
"Find the Logic" bit? Hire that guy. LOL, what a nicely snarky dismissal of Ms. Parker.

There she goes again
This gal needs to take some time off.

Compare...
"Thrills up the leg" and "57 states" are statements that shouldn't allow the contestants to race for their next hug. Same with the time-travel claim, where Roosevelt travelled forward then backward in time, then backward, bringing comfort and television to the masses.

On the other hand, biological differences exist: PET scans show it. Same results, different pathways. Summers made no gaffe. But he's too good for the incoming administration, which will likely be run by 88 professors and adjuncts from Duke University.

Bad company, and you can't deny it.
Like the song says.

2spothipshot . . . what?

So, after the syntactical train wreck of your own smarmy rant, you accuse Ms. Parker of a rhetorical "murky mess"?
Do you really think there is clarity in your own incomprehensible babble?

Kim Gandy
Who cares what Kim Gandy thinks or does? N.O.W. is completely irrelevant, so is she.

The picayune gripes of this group are best left back in the 70's where they belong.

If Kim and N.O.W. really wanted to do something about rights for women they would address the problems we face with our growing muslim population. Honor killings in America? Veiled womwn shopping the shoe dept. in Macy's? I guess that is fine with Kim and her group as long as no one attacks their math skills.

As for Kathleen....,who could say it better than post #2?

It's all about Kathleen.......
Jeez, apologize already. (you totally spoke out of place)

Say you stuck your foot in your mouth. (you did big time)

Give us some time. (talk about something else for a while. Bashing liberal idiocy will help your cause)

And then, after a long "Summer"......

Kathy needs an intervention!!
THERE ARE PILLS FOR THIS!!!

-Ray
NRA Life Member
Soli Deo Gloria!!

Kathy, Kathy, Kathy!
I have been a fan for a long time, but I'm really beginning to question many of your recent columns. There is HUGE chasm of a difference between stating truth and having it distorted by pols for political purposes and saying something truly stupid and offensive.

Let's take two of the examples you listed above. First the Summers comment was merely speculative comment on the obvious differences of the sexes. It was twisted and contorted by feminists who got their panties in a wad because, "OMG, we can't allow someone to say we women can't do everything a man can!"

Then, let's look at the Biden comment. He IS a pol and his idiotic statement was made in an attempt to engender support for himself. It was stupid, it was thoughtless, and it was hurtful. In short, it was typical Biden.

If we allow thin-skinned, whiney people to dictate and frame the debate in ways that we can't say things that are true but hurt their sensibilities, then we should just shut up. We've alread lost the debate.

Tod Kozeluh
Lexington, KY

Relativism in Dumb
There might be a statute of limitations on dumb things said by Harvardites, including the grad who is now President-elect, right after a statute of limitations is passed on Bush bashing.
Perhaps Obama can include the latter in his planned and prompt 200+ Executive Orders.

Kathleen
Shut up already, you got your man in office, you've done enough damage.

PS

I didn't read it I just noticed you wrote something.

Waste of Time
Dang. What'd I read this column for? What a waste of time. Parker's becoming less and less relevant in her requirement to churn out something, anything, each week for her paycheck.
Summers was obviously right in what he said and he shouldn't have wimped out in leaving Harvard, and all the rest of it. There are obvious, common sense differences between men and women, women generally being more nurturing, better at the helping professions etc. - education, medicine, social work etc., than are men. Commonsense - which wouldn't require any explication whatever except in an age as depraved as ours, what with abortion, 'gay' 'marriage', euthanasia and all the nauseating rest of it. If people adhered to morality and common sense most lawyers, judges, politicians, journalists, columnists and their disgusting ilk would be unemployed as the social bs fraction they give rise to would fall to infinitesimal, undetectable levels.

Pretend Writer
Parker,
You may call yourself conservative but you are anything but. . .you write liberal propoganda. . .give me a break!

Apology
Perhaps Kathleen can get to the point, and apologize. That would be a start. But first, she needs to admit that she's been duped - and to go back to listening to her inner muse. And she needs to actually speak with Governor Palin, instead of pretending to have "made a mistake." Prove it.

Palin is still high in my view: people who denigrate her are not.


Amazing!
Kathleen Parker wrote an entire article without saying something snarky about Sarah Palin.

I'm still rubbing my eyes in disbelief.

huh?
Does Kathleen believe she is writing for a liberal blog? Why is she telling US to give Summers a break?

When have we been hard on him? He noted the obvious. It is the liberal feminist who got the vapors over his comments.

Of course THEY should give him a break. We already have.

dumb things
Oh, and yes, dumb things are forgiven, slips of the tongue are easily glossed over. But Kathleens Palin bashing, and turning to the dark side, will take more than just an "oops," to be forgiven.

She may have to write a whole article. She might have to sit down with Sarah and explain herself. She may have to "I was Wrong."

Feminists and NOW?
Aren't they the ones who fight for womens rights and equality? Oh... thats right, they do... as long as the women in question are Liberal and PRO- abortion. Women who are Pro-Life and conservative aren't to be included and fought for. They get bashed and smeared by the likes of Kathleen Parker! Go away already!!!... please!!!

Jacqueline
Yes but look at the subject. I believe this column is actually a thinly veiled attempt to compare herself to Larry Summers. Problem is Summers put forth an idea, asked a question if you will, concerning a couple of studies he read and Parker made a vitriolic, petty attack based on her feelings on a specific person.

Nice try, Kathleen, but you are not Larry Summers. Your two situations are as different as the battle of the Alamo is from Alamo Rent-a-Car.

Hmmmm ....
I noticed that there was not one single reference asking for the detractors of Sarah Palin to give her a break despite the fact that she committed even fewer gaffes than Obama, whom there is a refernece to.

A little double standard there, Kathy?

Summers' Defense
Your defense of Summers is as fair an explanation of the circumstances which got him into trouble at Harvard as I've read. Moreover, in this time of crisis, we need someone at Treasury who is not a Champion of Wall Street, yet who understands it well enough in order to inform the passage of legislation that needs to be very carefully crafted by ones motivated solely by an idealistic passion for the public good. I don't know enough about Larry Summers to know if he's the one, but he certainly is more like the one than Paulsen, who likely high-fives the Wall St. greedheads when he sees them on the street.

Hey KP...
you wrote:Kim Gandy, National Organization for Women president, expressed her concerns to the Huffington Post. My Question? While you were visiting HufPo...did you tell them you are available?? Just think... Arianna, Kathleen Parker, and Kim Gandy...together...how could a lefty like you pass something like that up??? You could leave here, and we would never have too be bothered with your idiocy again.

Good grief!
So, feminists are ready to sacrifice economic soundness (possibly) on the altar of political correctness because of their whiny, girly (sorry) angst? Of course they are, because this is the way their brains work. Dumb feminist jokes should really be funnier than dumb blonde jokes. What a load of utterly stupid, illuminati bull!

Help the "Harvard Man"
What is it with her and Harvard Men. If they were really so much smarter than the rest of us they wouldn't be working for the govt. in the first place.
An earlier reply made a really good point. Who does Kathleen think she's writing too. Is her thread reprinted in the D'Kos? It would certainly explain alot.
Consevatives don't have a problem with Summers Kathleen. You on the other hand...

Fishing in the Shallow End:
Ms. Parker,

Cutting edge for the maladjusted Left but hardly perspicacious for those of us who were Professor Summers only advocates, during his unjust and seemingly interminable vilification.

In other words, you’re preaching to the choir.

Then again, from the looks of this offering, it would appear you're plumbing the shallow end of the gene pool, fishing for your new audience. After all, it’s obvious you’re not resonating with this one.

I don't even read her anymore...
Just drop in, give KP 1 check, and politely ask her to go away. Please go away, KP. Thank you.

Dear Ms Parker
Don't go away angry. Just go away.......

Maybe some mis-statements can get a pass
But outright lies should not. Obama lied in a TV interview about why he voted the way he did on BAIPA in Illinois. Then his campaign said he mis-represented his position to a major newspapaper THE VERY NEXT DAY. And Obama never admitted to it and was thereby given a pass. Biden has lied and gaffed so much it's unbelievable. No room to put them all here. As for the muslim thing, I believe it was written on an official Indonesian document (obviously which one escapes me) that as a child living there, he was muslim. He may not be today, but the proof is there that he was, so let's not insinuate it's just another GOP smear tactic to imply he was, because he actually was.

Women
Kathleen, You will do anything to defend someone that hates women. It's interesting that you are defending Lawrence Summers (a democrat) who also hates women, just like you do. You contributed to the downfall of Sarah Palin and McCain's campaign because of your hatred of women. Go see a mental health professional instead of writing!! We all need a long break from your contributions and writings. Both Republicans and Women need a break from hearing from you! Marilyn, Charlotte,NC

KP - Thumbsucker extraodinaire
While the Democrats are in the process of stealing an election in Minnesota, we are to have sympathy for a Clinton toady that got caught in his own PC tarpit. What a waste of valuable space

Hopefully
Parker will soon be writing about a Bone Break. one of her own!

Catty Kathy
You must have been out purring late and had to throw this piece together fast. Were you alley-catting around with your sisters-in-crime?

The same liberal mindset you are afflicted with is what caused Summers problems to begin with. Nothing he said justified his treatment.

Liberals just cannot take criticism or opposition. No conservative college ever shouts down the opposition,throws food at them or forces them to cancel an engagement like liberals do.

Are you trying to ease back into our good graces,Catty? Criticizing liberal now-gals?It won't work with some of us hard-noses.


Kathleen
Have you noticed that no reads your drivel anymore? We all just stop by and read the comments and then tell you to leave. Please do so and make room for a real writer.

Does this mean I am Summers Jr.?

I am going to commit a “Summers” that is a true story, and I am sure will bring down the wrath of millions.

Back in the 1950s, I was working for the most prestigious think tank. Computers had just been invented, and we needed to hire thousands of people who had never heard of a computer, and train them to be Programmers.

I had been introduced to that business in about 1944, and earned my living in that industry starting in 1950.

After spending some time at places like MIT and their WHIRLWIND computer, UCLA with the SWAC, and others, I suggested that it looked to me like being a Programmer would be a good job for a lady.

Well, I was laughed out of the room. Over the next 25 years I worked with, or at least met, thousands of Programmers, and very few were women, and only a very few of those were good, to excellent programmers.

I would expect I taught a couple of hundred programmers who would program computers to put the men on the moon, and I remember not one lady in any class that I taught. I love to associate with ladies, so if I had anything to do with hiring, that might have been different.

A few years ago I called several men who I knew had been Supervisors, Managers, and Directors of thousands of Programmers in their professional lives.

I asked what percentage of the lady programmers they hired and supervised were excellent programmers, versus the percentage of male programmers. They each told me that of the small number of ladies who would become a programmer, very few compared to the men who worked for them.

The next day one of them called me back, and spilled his soul with his low opinion of women programmers over the 40 years they had worked for him.

Understand, I have been out of the business for over 30 years now, so I have no idea if that idea has changed for the better.

Now don’t expect me to say why any of this was true, but it really was.


Summers
Kathleen,
You might have included yourself in the list of folks mis-speaking. Pre-election criticism that hurts the ticket is stupid and wrong. Post election criticism for the purpose of making the GOP successful is welcome even if bitter to swallow. Yours was the former. And yes there comes a time at which amnesty for asininity is appropriate. You have not reached yours yet.

KP Losing her audience
The first article I remember reading of yours were the two that were critical of Palin which the Dallas Morning News hopped on ricky tick to show its readers "don't worry about voting because even conservatives don't like their own ticket." Your poor judgement in jumping ship in a watershed election has made you the political equivalent of the Dixie Chicks who didn't seem to know their audience either. Not having a clue as to what an unfettered Democrat "change" machine might do to our country means your opinions are suspect up front. Like the Chicks you should be able to continue your career operating in the opposing camp masquerading as a "conservative" voice in rags like the Washington Post, Newsweek etc.

Andrew #13 writes: "Dang. What'd I read

this column for?"

EXCELLENT POINT! The best thing to do is to NEITHER READ NOR POST... Then when her columns show no interest, TH will have to re-think the value of continuing to have Parker as one of the TH regulars.

It all comes down to "Free Enterprise." The number of posts is a direct correlation to the bottom line.

Ronald Wilson Reagan
You beat me to the punch. Whenever I read anything by KP, I'm reminded of the lyrics to an old Motley Crue song: "Girl, don't go away mad. Girl, just go away!" Ha-Ha!

Who cares?
One Obama supporter helping another. Is this the Huffington Post? Why do you continue publishing this woman?

KATHLEEN NOW THAT OBUMMER WON!
WHY DIDNT YOU BRING UP THE 57 STATES BEFORE!WOW .

WE ARE GOING INTO WINTER !
A SUMMERS BREAK!????WIERD O RAMA!

Obama and his Muslim "call to prayer"
Hey folks don't you think arguing about "obama policies" is a bit presumptuous?
HE'S NOT EVEN PROVED THAT HE'S A NATURAL BORN U.S. CITIZEN! And the truth is HE CAN'T because he was BORN IN KENYA and he doesn't have a certificate of LIVE BIRTH for the State of Hawaii, only a "certification" for FILE purposes only [basically a note from his mother] and of which would not even allow a person to get a drivers license.

2012 Conservative Resistance Movement:

#1 We do not acknowledge Barack Husein Obama as President of the United States. [Never refer to him as president because he is not fit to serve this great nation. He is not even a natural born U.S. Citizen, as is required to hold office of the presidency.]
http://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/%E2%80%A2-20 12-conservative-resistance-movement-1-we-do-not-acknowledge -barack-husein-obama-as-president/

The latest on the fake Obama birth certificate cases:

http://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/wp-admin/page.php?actio n=edit&post=420

If you care about the US Constitution and TRUTH demand Obama stop this charade!

-An Independent

Townhall.com
"where your opinion counts"?? Hey Townhall.com... it seems the overwhelming Opinion here is that Kathleen Parker should be outta here already! With the wonderful list of "Real" conservative writers you have here... ok...how could I forget... George Will is here too...another elitist faux conservative writer...anyway... those 2 are really stinking the place up...and are very out of step with the real and true conservative voices we come here to read... that's just my opinion...however...I don't think I'm alone...so...does that count??

Kathleen
This is what you STILL do not understand. You did hurt Sarah Palin. You did not know ANYTHING about her when you wrote your cruel pieces.You did givevalidation to those on the left who were salivating in their hate of her.

You had a myriad of other things that you could have written about. You did not. It was High School Girl MEAN!


I keep reading to see
if you have anything good to say...and I continue to be disappointed. I see you put in all "gaffes" to be "forgiven and forgotten" except those you think Sarah Palin made while campaigning. Perhaps you mean that we should forgive and forget the things you said about Sarah Palin? This article is nonsense and you are quickly becoming a less than relevant author.

Another one star for Kathleen!
You go, girl!

Give it up, Kathleen
Palin is younger, smarter, better-looking than you, even her husband is better-looking than your husband!

Now, now Kathleen!
Try to think of Palin as the daughter you never had, dear. You need to have more equanimity in your golden years.

Dumb
Any chance that reporters and others might figure out that "dumb" does not mean "stupid"? Actually it means speechless, something we could wish on all our politicians.

suggestion
To Mr. Summers and all others who might need this:

Once upon a time the late Mayor of Chicago Richard Daley was asked a question that he didn't like by a Chicago Reporter about a favor da mayor had done for someone, I think one of his (da mayor's) sons.

I am not now nor have I ever been a fan of da mayor but his answer is worthy or repetition many times over in these pc times, and I would go so far as to say that it is time to bring it out again - as in over and over.

Came da mayor's answer: "I'll see you at the Christmas party and I'll be wearing mistletoe on the back of my suit."

Get it?

There also comes to mind the response of Ann Landers to a particularly moronic statement from a correspondent.

Quoth she: "You have a point but if you keep your hat on maybe no one will notice?"

5 stars for KP from now on
Since you purists still refuse to allow diversity of opinion on Townhall, I'm going to start giving KP 5 stars for every article she writes from now on, just to balance your 1 star that has nothing whatsoever to do with the content of THAT article. I encourage anyone else who believes that freedom of speech is a conservative value to do the same.

And if KP is booted from TH, I'm done with TH. I'm a conservative who admires Gov. Palin and voted for McCain and Prop. 8, but if this witch hunt results in the expulsion of another columnist who didn't follow the orthodox line, then TH will have proven that they are NOT the true voice of the future of conservatism in the US. The future of the conservative doesn't necessarily entail becoming more moderate, but it DOES involve reaching out to people with different views, not shutting them out. KP is not a liberal, and you know it. Look at all her average votes prior to her first column that was critical of Palin. 3 to 4 stars on average. But I suppose you'll just say she had you fooled then and now she's showing her true liberal colors.

And, you prove yourselves no better than Obama, Reid and Pelosi who are poised to kick Lieberman from the party for the high crime of supporting McCain over The One. I don't see any of you defending the Dems over that.

Grow up.

Maybe we need this diversity
that KP brings. If we only read articles from those we agree with, there wouldn't be much variety here. Yes this is a conservative website, but the more I think about it, the more I would rather KP stay even though her viewpoints aren't conservative. My issue with her is how she tends to get condescensing toward those she disagees with. But that's not so abnormal either. How much have we done that with Obama, Biden, (myself with Al Gore recently), etc. I say she should stay. It gives this site a little varity and keeps our juices flowing. Forcing her out seems too much like censoring to me. If others like Daily Kos and Huffington Post have forced writers to leave because they were writing positive things on GOP types and negative things on dem types, then let's not stoop to their level.

Robert
You clearly don't get it. We read articles we disagree with all the time. That's WHY we like TH. Its our Oasis from the madness.

Read the "about us" at the bottom of the page it reads, "Townhall.com is designed to amplify conservative voices in America’s political debates."

KP is not amplifying my voice with her recent posts. She's strangling it.

Consider the Critical Issues...
facing the country and that this is what Parker elects to address in her column--defense of a Clinton crony. Parker irrelevancy and liberal kiss-up has reached new heights.

Oh, and, Brog. We won't miss you. You'll feel much more comfortable blogging at the KOS.

What liberals say about Parker
So she's a left winger now, is that it? Guess someone forgot to tell buzzflash:

"Parker has always seemed a little bit envious of the right-wing nasty 'slash and burn' prime-time celebrities like Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter."

http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/03/11/ana03303.html

or Media Matters. This link is just to one of their typical dubiously partisan "fact checks".

http://mediamatters.org/discuss/200711060007

The real pearls are in the comments section:

"brings to mind the old will rogers saying. parker never met a democrat whose motives she couldn't question."

"(quoted post) Katheen Parker seems to have no problem saying a lie.

Well, she IS a conservative - isn't she?"

"In one of her spews she accuses medical professionals of making up the term "late term abortion" when the real term is partial birth. Of course the medical professionals use latin terms, duh. If she's not lying she is making stuff up, she rarely concerns herself with truth and facts."

or Crooks and Liars a whole 4 months ago. More message board praise for KP's progressive worldview:

"she's about as useless a human being as Bush and cheney are. she can shove her judgment, for it clearly is worth nothing. i doubt she's ever objected to one thing that Bush and cheney have done or wrought. failure of a journalist."

"Kathleen Parker is a stepford-conservative. It is so easy. You get the memo and your regurgitate it. And the newspapers wonder why people are stopping their subscriptions ... when they feature people like Kathleen Parker as opinion writers."

"As it was with Jesse Helms so it is with Kathleen Parker, beneath their courtly manner beat the hearts of a dictator and a bigot, usually the two go hand-in-hand."

"Parker is a paid propagandist and RNC opperative."


Why
Why isn't this obvious? Why does an exceptional article need to be written about it? I'm at my wit's end. Lord help us against the extremists of this world.

By the way, ALL the women I've dated and certainly the woman I married have higher GREs, etc., than yours truly.

What conservatives said about her
Amazon Reviews of Parker's recent book "Save the Males: Why Men Matter, Why Women Should Care"

"The Feminist Jihad against the male gender has got to stop, and Kathleen Parker's book is a vital contribution in the struggle to make sure that Taliban Feminism's debilitating stranglehold on Western Society is weakened and ultimately overthrown."

"In this thought-provoking book, author and syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker sets out to make the case that the American culture has become increasingly hostile towards men. The attack on men, launched by radical feminists, has only grown throughout the years, and the affects of it are growing alarming."

"Kathleen Parker brings a sane view to everything she writes about, which includes not only this book but her newspaper columns as well. She is alway careful to state the good points about opposing views in balance to the eventual points she makes. She always builds the reasoning for the points she makes with thoughtfulness. And she always makes sense! That's the thing that Parker seems to be able to illustrate so well: that common sense is just missing these days in so many areas of debate and on so many subjects. Kathleen Parker lays down common sense with wit, tongue-in-cheek humor, and with eyes wide open."

"[Parker] is 'right on' with the impact radical feminism has had on our culture"

"Parker is to be commended for clearly demonstrating the fallacies of the politically correct ways in which male and female roles have been steered in recent decades. She brings much-needed sanity to this discussion, and she does it with a delightful wit that comes through on every page."

These comments were all written within the last four months.

Sound like a raving tofu-eating flag-burning latte-drinking tree-hugging abortion-loving Prius-driving commie pinko to you?

Now even KP defenders are closet lefties
But, according to Dr Chaz (sounds like a quack to me), now apparently I'M a leftie as well.

Sorry Chaz, I love my country too much and hate liberialism too much as well to let kooks like you delude yourselves into thinking that you alone speak for the right. I too come to TH for a conservative respite from the ubiquitious MSM and Netroot lunacy, but I'll be damned if I let you kick out one of YOUR OWN over a single disagreement.

I know many of you want someone to blame for the sorry state the nation is in (which is only going to get worse now with an unchecked radical left party controlling congress and the while house). But Parker is not the one to blame for this. She did not hand the nation over to Obama.

Stop this witch hunt. Kathleen Parker is a Conservative. She has as much of a place here as other aberrant conservatives such as Pat Buchanan (anti-war in Iraq), John Stossel (libertarian), Larry Elder (libertarian), Jack Kemp (pro-DC statehood), Harry Jackson (supports black reparations for slavery), Steve Chapman (supports same-sex marriage), etc.
Why is it OK for all of those pundits to hold heretical opinions about a few issues but not Parker? Isn't that a tad hypocritical?

If you want to blame anyone for the Obamination, blame people like Mark Foley, Jack Abramoff, Ted Stevens and Dick Cheney. Those people don't represent Conservative America either of course, but the media managed to convince voters otherwise. So yes, we need high standards of integrity and honesty on the right. But KP hasn't done anything remotely on the level of the aforementioned do warrant this level of vitriol.

The GOP and the conservative movement DO need to exorcize their demons, but KP is not one of them.

Stop the witch hunt.

"And give Summers a break"
No, I won't give him a break. He's a Democrat and naturally thinks government should be more active in the current economic crisis, when the Federal government is to be blamed for it to begin with. Now his President is going to make things worse. A shame he was taken down by those femi-nazis, but I'm sure Obama will cave into them and not hire him.

Brog,
and everyone running to Parkers' defence: Look, we who can't stand Parker just have a difference of opinion w/ you. Why must you do to us what you claim we are doing to her? Don't WE have a right to "Palin" Ms. Parker? Apparently only gracious VP candidates are due that kind of treatment and not whiny, self absorbed, effete snobs. Oui?

You see, if Governor Palin had come out in favor of affirmitive action, or, "Tax hikes for the rich!", or said, "Second amendment? I don't see no second amendment in my 'How to Rule You Fools' handbook.", or, had aborted little Trig and tried to tell us it was the "Christian thing to do", then, and only after something(s) like THAT would Ms. Parker have been justified in ripping her. What DID we get? Ms. Parker mouthing the words of liberal elitists.

Bottom line: Parkers' "herstory" be damned! Ones true character comes out under tough circumstances and Ms. Parker failed the stress test miserably. There was an excellent General named Arnold once. He too failed when the chips were down. And yes, that DOES expunge any previous glad tidings she (and he) may have brought forth in the past. At least for me.

She is simply not trustworthy anymore. I will always be wondering, "Is she going to join the other side on THIS one too?" That is why we didn't like McCain and found Sarah to be his greatest, if not only, saving grace. I can just see it now: "K-Park v. Noonan - The Draw Down!"
Which one will have the quality of rhetorical flourish to achieve the title, "John McCains' speech writer and apologist extrordinaire"?

p.s. Parker was always over rated and got that way by the graciousness of TH readers, not by any discernable talent she may possess. Sorry, but she reads like a stuffy bore. My horrible syntax notwithstanding, her stuff is sorely lacking the upness to snuff w/ which TH readers have grown aquainted with.

Sommers
It seems like the loudest feminists that got the vapors from his speech were lesbian educators known to have used their tactics to extort raises and grants from cowering college administrations. One of them jumped off a roof and went splat.

Couldn't decide
Is it more effective to simply not click on a Parker article or to click & rate one star? Turns out the article was unreadable but the comments were fun.

However, since I get Townhall in my inbox everyday and there are more good articles than I have time to read, this will be the last time I bother with Ms. Parker.

Where's my turkey pot pie?
Woman, didn't I tell you to get off the damn computer and get your lazy fat stupid butt back into the kitchen where you belong and cook me some grub. Ain't nobody listening to your sorry butt these days except maybe the Mexican housekeeper or the pool boy. By the way, when are you going to update that photo of yours. I mean seriously, when was that taken, 1808? Well I just came by to give you your weekly one rating.

Ms. Parker: A Summers Break
Ms. Parker,

Having you forgotten: "hell has no fury like a woman's scorn"...or did you ignore it on purpose??

You forgot W
...and all the times he has "mis-spoken." He is in a class all by himself.

Anyway, I agree. Slips of the tongue should not condemn people permanently (although temporary mockery must be permitted or we would lose all the late night comics). Furthermore, as information and situations develop, people should be allowed to change their minds. If, after all, you see that the course you're driving will lead you off a cliff, it's time to turn around...

KATHLEEN SAYS
WE ARE GOING INTO WINTER SO TAKE A SUMMERS BREAK????TOO MANY COCKTAIL PARTYS NOT ENOUGH FISHING!???

Give Summers a Break
Good article, Ms. Parker. I agree, let's give Larry a break.

KP's Brain?
I used to like you,KP, but it seems that your brain has become addled recently. You've written some really dumb (and wrong) articles lately, and I've lost faith in your intellect and judgement. Adios Old Girl. I'm through with you.

2spothipshot
Quote: "and everyone running to Parkers' defence: Why must you do to us what you claim we are doing to her? Don't WE have a right to "Palin" Ms. Parker?"

I very much agree that Palin's treatment by the media was despicable and that KP was far too critical of her and should have given it a rest after 1 or 2 columns, tops. Like most of you, I gave her one star throughout October and was angry at any conservative even considering supporting Obama. Much of the hate mail she got before the election was justified.

But it's one thing for conservatives to express on no uncertain terms that "your views are wrong and dangerous and you lost my trust for a long time over this" and quite another to say "we won't forgive, forget or ever stop hounding you until you're censored." See the difference? That's the sort of thing you'd expect to read from the enlightened folk over at Kos, not TH.

B A from Texas has the right idea, and indeed all I'm trying to accomplish here: If you've decided that you can't stand KP's columns anymore, then it's very simple: DON'T READ THEM. Why do we all put up with paid-advertising-masquerading-as-columns from Roger Schlesinger and that other woman? That's definitely not conservative opinion, after all. Answer: we accept it because nobody forces us to read their columns. Well, nobody's forcing you to read KP's either. Why not just ignore her?

Lastly, I'm not "doing to you" what you're doing to her. Am I trying to censor you? You have a right to opine here. And I have a right to suggest you move on from KP bashing and get on with the more urgent and constructive work of rebuilding the conservative movement. The sooner the better.

P.S. Dunno if the "CA" was California or Canada, but if it's the former, Americans spell "defense" with an s.

Re: What abour Bill Ayers?...
Should he have the right to hold a well paid position even if he terrorized America in the sixties and got off on a technicality? I don't think so! He never "regretted" what he did; actually he said he wishes he could have done more! What about having himself photographed desecrating the American flag? I guess Ms. Parker, if you are a liberal America hater, you never lose your professorial position, especially if you support and entertain high-powered Chicagoan politicians, who eventually become the President of the United States of America. But this President-elect went to the "right" school: Harvard and the Chicago "Political Science University of Cronyism,” not like Sarah Palin who attended and graduated from nameless colleges, yet became a successful mayor and governor in Alaska. Well Ms. Parker, your judgment is impeccable and your compassion is remarkable! What a joke!

Brog
"Much of the hate mail she got before the election was justified."

I don't "hate" Ms. Parker, I just don't think she fits here at TH. Most of my posts poke fun at her for being a bore, something the left simultaneously has a never ending supply of yet never seems to get enough of, so I joined the popular movement to move her...very far away. Your next point of me wanting to shut her up is misplaced for, I only hold contempt for the notion that she is trustworthy NOT that she should'nt be allowed to ply here wares ANYwhere.

As for the "paid ads masquerading as columns" part, that is apples to oranges. Yes, it is a good point to say, "Well just don't read the phony column.", but, it is quite another to tell us to forgive and forget, what is in many minds, a cardinal sinner on the order of a Benedict Arnold. We Canadians honor and celebrate the old lug every year on his birthday, but I can see why a Yank would hate him. I mean, if your wonderful "education" system taught actual history, you blokes would revile Arnold that is. That leads to my real point: In the current "sociopolitical" environs of modern America (with all out traitors running huge chunks of government, "education", entertainment, information, etc.) it is common practice to have someone do something horrific, like calling those keeping you safe "cold-blooded killers", and then get let off scot free after apologizing, or, in the case of psuedointellectuals like the fair Ms. Parker here -and the afore(not)mentioned piece of crap murtha- she gets to backstab away and then cry foul to her victims for not appreciating her carving style. (continued at my blog, just click on my name)


Someone should pull the plug on ...
.... this boring woman and send her back to the Compost, whose uniformly room temperature IQd picture lookers and bird-cage liners (they're all too damned dumb to read!) are likely a better audience for her tiresomely tedious one-tick tales.

Brian Richard Allen
Los Angeles - CalifUBAMAcated 90028

"A new Beliefnet.com exit poll ....
"... found that half of (those who voted for Senator) McCain (believe) Obama is or was a Muslim, with 32 percent saying, 'He used to be Muslim and still has too many connections to Islam.'"

While the other half of the Mccain Palin ticket's supporters are a bit more astute and KNOW he was and/or likely still is a Muslim and the other 68% are saying "he used to be Muslim and still has too many connections to Islam."

AND that he still has too damned many too damned arrogantly overt connections to foreign and domestic islamanazi and other terrorists and to the every known foreign and domestic kind of RICO racketeer, mobster and standover and shakedown merchant.

From all of whose criminal kickbacks, now amounting to more than a Half Billion Dollars, he continues to obscenely profit!

PALIN/JINDAL/2012

Brian Richard Allen
Los Angeles - CalifUBAMAcated 90028

Brog writes:
"The GOP and the conservative movement DO need to exorcize their demons, but KP is not one of them.

Stop the witch hunt."

Aslan writes:

Perhaps if KP would stop her witch hunt against Sarah Palin....Conservatives would stop their witch hunt against her.

On the other hand, here Kathleen sounds like the limousine Liberals at the Huffington post who would encourage and support the resurgence of the so called FAIRNESS DOCTRINE so that Conservative like Limbaugh, Buchanan and Ron Paul would be drawn and quartered....

This video below says it all:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l46t_nrySg4

MS. PARKER'S SELF ANALYSIS?
She said: "Shouldn't there be a statute of limitations on dumb things expressed in public? "

Was she talking about her dissing of Palin?

She said "One small slip, repeated and amplified, can have serious consequences."

Perhaps that accounts for her columns all having one-check ratings.

Boo Hoo on the Witch Hunt
If you are going to publish and disseminate your opinions via a column, then readers have every right to disagree with your opinion and express the fact that perhaps they do NOT want to read your columns anymore. I cannot do or say anything I want at work without impugnity and neither can she. Yet, she wants to put out whatever claptrap that has the pretense of a serious examination of issues and then cry like a little girl if she has to take some heat.
I disliked her Palin columns. But, I completely lost respect for her when she started her subsequent "Whine Fest". Go publish elsewhere. She is boring and irrelavent. I am sure there are many new exciting conservative writings waiting in the wings that can articulate repo and conservative ideology.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.