Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Other Bush Legacy
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


WASHINGTON -- Women, not men, will save the world.

First lady Laura Bush didn't say those precise words, but her remarks Monday to a small gathering of biographers, historians and journalists implied as much.

If she's right, America's first lady will have played a significant role in that evolution. Women's gains around the world, in places like Kabul and Riyadh, are occurring in no small part because of Laura Bush's quietly feminist maneuvering as wife of the U.S. president.

The purpose of Monday's meeting, which included lunch and a curator-led tour of the second-floor residence, was to allow the first lady's potential chroniclers access to her thoughts and future plans.

Sitting in the Yellow Oval Room that leads to the Truman Balcony, Mrs. Bush said she intends to continue helping women and children through her education and health initiatives. She also hopes to include women's leadership training as part of her husband's planned Freedom Institute at Southern Methodist University.

Fittingly, The Washington Post's front page Monday featured a story about Rwandan women running the show where once they were victims of systematic rape during that country's 1994 genocide. Last month, the Rwandan parliament became the first in the world with a female majority (56 percent), and women hold a third of all Cabinet positions, including Supreme Court chief and police commissioner general.

Inside the paper, Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt wrote about Burma, where Mrs. Bush has played a leading role in pushing for release of democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who has spent more than 13 years under house arrest. Hiatt criticized a new International Crisis Group report that urges the West's cooperation with the human rights-abusing Burmese government. The same report also denounces Laura Bush's "megaphone diplomacy."

About that megaphone. Could we possibly get the lady an amplifier?

As one who traveled last October with Mrs. Bush to the Middle East to advance the State Department's breast cancer initiative, I've been privileged to watch her in action, as well as to appreciate the life-saving results of her efforts. Largely because of her, and the breast-cancer-crusading Susan G. Komen for the Cure organization, women in that harshly patriarchal part of the world have been given an empowering voice.

More importantly, women are surviving.

Before Mrs. Bush began meeting with leaders in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates, 80 percent of Middle Eastern breast cancer victims died. Already, those figures are expected to drop as women relieved of shame seek earlier diagnosis and treatment.

As Mrs. Bush noted Monday, health is a freedom issue. To be free, one must first be alive. Then, one must be educated.

The U.N. reports that 774 million people worldwide cannot read or write. Of those, two-thirds are women. Seventy-five million children don't attend school.

The first lady, who is an honorary ambassador for the U.N. Literacy Decade, spoke earlier this month at the U.N. about the importance of closing the gender gap in literacy. "If women are educated, everything across the board improves for their families," she said.

Indeed, it is widely understood among international humanitarian groups that the most effective way to reduce poverty and disease is to educate women.

In Afghanistan, where Laura Bush has traveled three times, impressive strides are being made in education and equality. Today, one-third of the more than 6 million Afghan children in school are girls.

Many readers may be learning these things for the first time and wonder why. In part, it may be because Mrs. Bush's demure librarian-teacher persona has minimized her appeal to the media. But Bush's Texas manners should not be confused with passivity. She is a serious player whose White House tenure provides lessons for the next first lady.

Among them is one Mrs. Bush wishes she had learned sooner -- that the first lady has a bully pulpit and should use it. Although she gave the first-ever radio address by a first lady in 2001, urging support for Afghan women, Bush didn't hit her stride until her husband's second term.

Did she ever. Her mission has been anything but modest: to save women, educate girls, end poverty, reduce disease, expand democracy and promote freedom.

Women may not save the world -- at least not without the help of enlightened men -- but history will judge that one Laura Bush did her part.

Brava.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
WHY?
Why is this traitor still on Townhall, send her to the Daily Koz where she belongs.......

Kathleen Parker
Who cares? Just go.

Kathleen, Please get the message
No one really cares to read your BS. In a week if you are still here we can start using this board for you to plot what to do with the backstabbers who think they should tell us how we should think in the Republican party.

PS: I am sure you are one of the people who thought McCain was a good idea and then bailed.

Kathleen
What can we do to let the people in charge of Townhall know that Kathleen Parker needs to no longer be published here?

Irony
Reginald: "No one really cares to read your BS"

So says the person who responded to her post almost immediately

tedmug
"Who cares?"

You, apparently, considering you responded to this post so quickly

Guess who has become a tool of the left

What? No Palin Article?
Kathleen,

you only have one more week of the MSM throwing roses your way until they won't need you anymore. You should have written another anti-Palin article with random thoughts from your husband thrown in so you can get your last glimpses of fame.

sad
Laura Bush was the only good thing in the white house over the last 8 years.

"Women, not men, will save the world"
But not Sarah Palin, according to KP. Gotta be someone more innaleckshual.

Next first
Do you think Michelle and Bernadine can do something equally impressive?

Hey snake oil salesman . . .
Stop writing columns. There's no talent here. Just spitting back words that left wing feminists have written better than you, for years. Retire.

Open Your Minds Fellow Repubs
Ya'll sound like liberals, bashing someone who has the nerve to disagree with you. In this case, Kathleen Parker, brilliant, entertaining, intellectual yet accessible, KP. So you don't like ONE of her opinions in how many years? Chill, people, or you will start to sound like liberal sheeple, "Everyone must agree with me or they suck!"

Sorry, I don't get it!
I mean, I understand the frustration with Ms. Parker conerning her dissing of Palin, but some of you people need to get a life. Can't a person express their opinion without being considered evil?

I've was a fan of Ms Parker long before I discovered TownHall. As wrong as I think she was/is on Sarah Palin, I'll continue to read her prose. Like in the past, sometimes I'll agree with her and sometimes I won't. I just don't get how people can seemingly harbor such vile hatred for someone with a different opinion.

I believe the majority of Americans are sensible people and when they hear or read the type of vitriol posted here, it will only serve to turn them off to you and, hence, your positions. Please all, rethink your approach to people of differing opinions.

Tod Kozeluh
Lexington, KY

Goodmom....
well said and succinct. I should just shut my yap and let the more erudite handle the bashers.

Tod Kozeluh
Lexington, KY

Yes, brava!
Parker rightly recognizes an important Bush legacy here. Although many conservatives and Christians wish the Bushes had given more voice to saving the lives of the unborn during their White House tenure, the plight of abused and disenfranchised females around the world is a serious problem. Parker is no more enlightened than other MSM illuminati in some regards, but she got this one right.

Laura Bush vs. Feminists
Dear Kathleen,
The first thing the whacky leftist American feminists wanted to do in Afghanistan was to ensure that women could get abortions! Sad. What a misuse of time and effort, demanded by the socially retarded and the demented.

It showed: they weren't interested in real progress, like the things you mentioned, education, healthcare and so forth. They didn't know how to liberate the Afghani women from the Taliban, a bunch of losers who wouldn't suffer a woman to see the light of day.

However, it was only the power behind her, the troops the President sent, that gave her a bully pulpit.

Ms. Bush has, through position and charm, gotten places most other women haven't been able to go. But that is also possible because her husband took the offensive in places like Iraq, where Saddam's evil sons did whatever they wanted to women, and put power behind her words. A good analogy is Libya: they dropped WMDs faster than a Cowboy drops passes, but only because there was a viable threat to their regime when they were caught with WMDs of a nuclear nature being sent by cargo ship. Without Iraq, Libya would have thumbed its nose at us.

Rosalyn Carter didn't have such power behind her. Sending her, charming as she was, would have had all the effect of scattering a milkweed in the wind.

Goodmom beat me to it
Goodmom beat me to the post I wanted to make...but that won't stop me. :)

I can understand people's frustration with Parker's snipes concerning Palin. I too found them surprisingly poor in both content. But is that not exactly the point: we were surprised at them because they did fall very short of the quality we have come to expect from Ms. Parker. The Palin columns are the exception, not the rule of Ms. Parker's writing, so let us not throw her under the bus for those singular failures.

And must we be so crude in our responses? Viagra? Porn? B1tch? Goodmom is correct that such responses are the sort of stuff we expect from liberals. And what of "traitor." Traitor to what? A party that has been a traitor to its principles for the last 8 years? The Republican Party has no right to expect loyalty from the very folk who worked so hard to put them in power, then watched as the Party set aside its own priniciples. THEY BETRAYED US.

I'll likely vote R this coming Tuesday, but I won't like it. R and D are now BOTH left of center, in my book; but R is not so far left.

Parker Has a Comment?
I'll vote for her removal from townhall...they don't need equal time for ignorance.

I can't stand Kathleen Parker.
She should add somewhere in here:

"And this year, John McCain took a little known woman from Alaska as his running mate - just the second woman for this position, and the first on the Republican ticket - and I trashed her top to bottom, without ever having met her or ever having a conversation with her. I am a disgraceful hypocrite."

the gap is closing
President Reagan once asked, "If not us, who? If not now, when?"

Now is our moment. $3M has been raised in just the past few days. Goptrust.com started ads in two swing states and is now running the Rev. Wright ad in 5 states.

If McCain holds OH, FL nd NC, and graba PA, McCain wins.

The election is just days away. It's crunch time folks. Go to goptrust.com to see the ad and make a donation so that Obama cannot win and enact two major initiatives he is committed to:

Give 12 million illegals citizenship. You may recall the Dems tried that in 2007 but failed.

With super-majorities in the Senate and the House, he will get his wish. Most will register as Democrats and vote for Democratic candidates.

This single act — giving illegals citizenship — will give the Democrats permanent control over the House and Senate for a generation to come

Second, he wants to close down talk radio with the so called "Fairness Doctrine." And remember this Orwellian "Fairness" broadcasting law could easily be made to apply to Fox News - bout the only place one can go if they do not want to watch biased reporting.



kathleen and moshe
has her own little trolls who assume that one must first read her column before commenting. What morons.

Susan B. Komen
Thanks for the great read. Mrs. Bush certainly deserves much credit when it comes to advancing human rights and the rights of women worldwide.

Please do not diminish that credit by casting it on Susan B. Komen, as well. You speak of her glowingly as a "breast-cancer-crusad[er]" but do you know about her relationship with Planned Parenthood? Susan Komen is on the board of PP. This matters because there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, though of course the Susan B. Komen Foundation will not admit as much given her vested interest in PP's continued success. For more on this, please go here: http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/susan_g_komen_foundation_ha s_t.html

Ben from NY
You were here for 8 yers aren't you good?
History will treat this President far better thn the News Media has. They invested a lot of credibility in the 2000 and 2004 elections only to be wrong both times. Yes they went to Florida and Ohio and recounted the ballots and could not find the eveidence to change the elections so they have trashed a good man who has stood by his principles. They say,He is not smart. He can't speak well ever. He lied about Iraq.

In these 8 years the News Media has been as wrong on what they reported as they have thought the President was. Yellow Cake we found tons, removed by the Russians. Posion Gas we found that too. We won't win well we are thanks to the President not the News Media or the Democrats that we stood behind in Bosnia. Iraqis can't govern themselves they are in control of 3/4 of their own country. The war was about oil so the price has allen and we still haven't gotten any of those oil profits. By the way the Democrats lai such enviormental standards on the government of Iraq that we didn't get any of that oil. Hi policies caused the stock market to fall look at the last 20 elections and the stock maket has followed the way they preceived the aopparent winners policies would effect the market. Obama winning as his numbers went up the market fell. Now that the numbers are more equal they are leveling out.

Lowest unemployment, highest standard of living, most home owners in history and the list can go on for pages but you are invested in telling the story of an embarrased News Media that is losing money hand over fist and having to lay employees off becasue many people aren't listening to them any more.

Susan Komen
donates money to Planned Parenthood. Somebody please inform Kathy Parker of that since PP specializes in aborting baby girls. Parker has devoted much of her time to trashing a woman, the Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, because of her own insecurities and hatred of any woman who is younger and prettier than she is which, come to think of it, is most women. When will TH dump this silly twit?

Laura...
"Women may not save the world -- at least not without the help of enlightened men -- but history will judge that one Laura Bush did her part."

I need a barf bag. Yes, she did her part - marrying a well off moron, who unfortunately became president of the U.S. and did his best to sink its economy by signing whatever came across his desk. You think all this diplomacy by his wife amounts to anything? You may be right about Sarah, but you're way off on Laura.

agree here
re:
(Obamanation wants to:)
Give 12 million illegals citizenship. You may recall the Dems tried that in 2007 but failed.

With super-majorities in the Senate and the House, he will get his wish. Most will register as Democrats and vote for Democratic candidates.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This is not properly on Middle America's radar yet, but is a daunting danger. Some "cheap" labor advocates suggest that ILLEGAL aliens have "conservative social values" so perhaps they might be persuaded to vote Republican. HOGWASH! They will vote 90% with the left for big entitlement government; the other 10% will be too illiterate to read the voting instructions in Spanish and mistakenly vote Republican.

The ILLEGAL invasion threat is receiving no focus now because Amnesty John is the RINO/CINO candidate, but it is the greatest socio-economic and cultural danger we face. Press 2 for English-- sound all too familiar? Obama/the left WILL indeed embrace them-- and finish the sellout of Middle America.

What up Kathleen?
Laura's not an Ivy League gal....
Coming from U of T she has to be too stupit and unqualified to make positive change.

But she is average looking, I guess she has that going for her.

Be consistant at least.

Oracle1
Oracle1, I agree with you 100%. All the people who say they won't vote for McCain because of his support of the amnesty bill are in for a world of hurt when Obama gets into office and has NO RESTRICTIONS or border control efforts. He will embrace the illegal aliens and bestow upon them citizenship and welfare benefits all with the help of his democratic majority in Congress. Just like with abortions, there will be no restrictions on illegal immigration. If The Messiah is looking to increase the democratic base, amnesty and open borders is certainly one way to accomplish that goal.

Get rid of Kathleen Parker!
I didn't know who this lady was before she slammed Palin. Now, I realize that she most likely never wrote anything I cared about anyway. It appears that anything she writes, she makes the story about herself. Please knock her off of Townhall. I come here to read thought provoking articles. Not garbage like this!

The Other Bush Legacy
I read this with tears in my eyes and a lump in my throat. The women who Laura Bush is speaking for are the most pitiful downtrodden creatures in the world. They inhabit a world full of cruel, violent men who control and abuse them even to the point of denying them medical care. They die in mass numbers in childbirth in countries where rape is endemic and where they aren't allowed to go to school or make a living. I hope that the new First Lady continues what Laura Bush has begun. Thank you, Kathleen Turner for taking the high road and speaking out for true feminism.

TheOther Bush Legacy
Of course I meant Kathleen PARKER in reply #31.

RickV404 is unaware of history
In December of 2000, just as Clinton was leaving office, he and a complicit congress passed an exemption for wall street that had been illegal for most of the last 100 years. Read the story here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/26/60minutes/main454 6199.shtml?source=mostpop_story

This is the true story of how the market took a dump.

Tod Kozeluh
Lexington, KY

women
"If you do this for the least of these you have done this to me. " Jesus

Thank you Marlee #31 I agree. We think we are persecuted here in America - we can read and write, work, vote, go to the doctor, go to the grocery, send our kids to good schools, go to school ourselves to try and make a better life for our families... Thank you Laura Bush and thank you Kathleen Parker for writing about it. I have not read you before today so I can't comment on the past but I appreciate what you did here. Our new first Lady, Mrs, McCain, has already started to follow in these foot steps.




Why?
Why is this moron still on Town Hall? I passed up her other columns and just slid in today to see what was going on. I see only two stars, so no one is particularly impressed with her writing ability and she has become a tool for the left. Again, why is she still here? Get rid of her and make room for a conservative columnist

On Parker n Palin
I believe Parker was wrong for what (and when) she spoke regarding Palin. But I would rather have a columnist who dared to speak against the majority than one who feared to speak her mind.

It wasn't that long ago when the president of Harvard said something against the liberal party line (about women being different from men-- horror of horrors!) and the reaction was for him to apologize or be removed. Well, he apologized. What hypocritical insecurity-- on both sides of that one!

Kathleen Parker spoke outside the conservative party line on Sarah Palin-- oh. my. gosh! Chop her head off and feed it to the faithful!!

Removing Parker for her opinion on Palin would be a confirmation that the only difference between conservatives and liberals is the shade of yellow they reflect in their fear that truth can not speak for itself.

The zealots who are crying for Parker's head on a platter should simply remove their own from her columns. It's as simple as that. Save the righteous indignation for matters more worthy-- and less hypocritical.


conservative traitor
for all the liberal bashing here on townhall,
it is predictable but stunning to see some conservatives turn on thier own simply because of a differing opinion.

i guess to some conservatism means you must walk lockstep with every other conservative or you are a traitor.

the list has been growing over the years.

now parker and gen. powell are the latest traitors because they disagree with the idea that palin is ready to be president.

well, most americans agree so we must all be traitors.

free speech has no home in many conservatives politics.

light bulb
Oh I get it....
The purpose for these remarks/blogs is not to comment on the content of the article and it's worthiness but to degrade and insult the author.
My mistake. I thought we were in America where speech is free and opinions are not against the law... wait..we do still have that one don't we?

christianlib
Why don't you wait to see what actually happens in the conservative camp, rather than generalize about all conservatism? I have a feeling you would bash conservatism either way: for having no dissenting voices AND for having dissenting voices.

Conservatives would hardly be human if there were not some who were upset with Parker and Powell. (How's Joe Lieberman, BTW?) But the real question is whether those ranting against their views will be raised to the level of that which cowed the president of Harvard or to the level of, say, Nancy Pelosi.

Fairness doctrine from the right
Nice to see how the "conservative view" of proper application of fairness doctrine is exercised...

KATHLEEN DOES THIS MEAN !
DOES THIS MEAN YOU ARE VOTING MCCAIN-PALIN !??GOOD !!YOU MADE A GOOD CHOICE!

Parker doing better in the Style section
Ms. Parker is clearly better off writing about these kinds of subjects than truly political ones. Perhaps she can get a job in one of the remaining newspapers that have Style Sections.

But even this article was a bit weak. Why could she not bring herself to mention Sarah the Barracuda? Parker is sooooooooooooooo jealous. Poor lady.

dullhammer
if you review my post you will find i never condemned all conservatives.

i specifically and intentionally used the words some or many.

i have posted on townhall for years and have met some intelligent and articulate and principled conservatives.

i enjoy exchanging ideas with them and hearing their perspectives.

it causes me to examine my own beliefs from time to time and that is why i am here.

to challenge you and myself.

that being said, it is a common myth (imho) that liberals are against free speech, but i find that generally, there is a strain of conservativism that only allows for lockstep agreement and when that lockstep is broken, that person is deemed a traitor or worse.

Laughable Are the Liberals.
Townhall.com is a business that claims to cater to a conservative cliental.

Liberals, who all too often reject free speech and capitalism, tell Conservatives that they, Conservatives, don’t believe in free speech because they don’t want to read lib pabulum at a supposedly conservative website.

If Conservatives wanted that, they would visit Daily Kos more often.

Parker has no natural or God given right to post anything here at Townhall.com. The only rights Parker has are whatever contractual obligations may exist between her and Townhall.com. If Townhall.com does not wish to continue the business relationship when the current contractual period ends, they should terminate the business relationship. Townhall.com is under absolutely no obligation to renew her contract.

This is business decision having to do with satisfying the customer. It has nothing whatsoever to do with free speech. The customers have every right to make their displeasure known and demand change, or else.

Of course if the Democrats get the White House and a super majority in the Senate, they will pass “The Kill Free Speech Bill.” Perhaps it will apply to the internet as well as the radio. Then, the Marxists can tell Townhall.com who they have to include on their masthead.

BTW Parker has openly admitted that she considers herself more of a centrist and that she is socially liberal. At best, she is a Pseudo-Con.

Laura Bush
is a liberal cigarette smoker (check out the lines above her upper lip). She is also guilty of vehicular manslaughter. I don't want to hear anything from her. What kind of American First Lady puts on a burka and then grins?

Good Article
This was a great column by Ms. Parker. Our First Lady has not received much attention or credit for her efforts to improve the lives of women across the world. It is encouraging to see Ms. Parker point this out and praise Laura Bush.

Get off the stage
Ms Parker why don't you do your auditioning some place else.
We the readers at Townhall.com are sick of your
reactionary liberal bias.
If you are trying to get the Daily Kos to recognise you, don't waste our time by using our time and space.
If you want a reference I am sure the readers of the Townhall.com news letters will be more than happy to say some inspirational things about you.

A Great First Lady
Very good article. So few people know about the great things Laura Bush has accomplished, and is trying yet to accomplish for women and children everywhere. I think she has been very overlooked and underrated by the media.

Conservatives
Not all conservatives agree on every issue and that is certainly a good thing. I'm all for a diversity of conservative opinion on Townhall.

But any columnist like Kathleen Parker who would support Obama should no longer have a voice in conservative circles. This election is too important. If you support electing a socialist president and giving liberals like Pelosi and Reid total control of the federal government and possibly having the courts lost to conservative thought for a generation then yes you do not deserve to be published at Townhall.

Good news AP poll this AM
More good news this morning. The Gallup tracking poll today has McCain within just 2 points of Barack Obama.

This race is incredibly close, despite what the media says. Obama simply cannot close the deal. He has a hard time breaking past 48 or 49% of the vote.

The American people have grave reservations about this man becoming president.

The National Republican Trust PAC is driving home a simple message through the weekend: Obama cannot be trusted to become our president.

The new ad reminds voters about Obama's long friendship with the Rev. Wright. It is now airing in key swing states.

This ad has been airing in battleground states and it is going to begin running nationally on the major TV networks thanks to the support of loyal Republicans all over the U.S.

http://www.goptrust.com

And now Sarah Palin . . .
. . . will do her part. Well observed, Ms Parker! So to speak.

Interesting
So Parker, why do you hate Sarah Palin so? Are you one of those "feminist" that believe the woman's role is that of "First Lady", but not as second in command? Really, that is the feeling that I get. As if you praise Laura Bush for staying in her "place" and doing great work instead of trying to actually do the job up front and personal as Sarah Palin is trying to do.
I "hope" I am wrong, but I doubt it.

christianlib
You are correct about your use of "some" and "many". It was the word "conservatism" that made me feel you were taking on the whole bunch. Sorry to have not read your more closely. But that is why an honest exchange is needed sometimes.

As for there being a "a strain of conservativism that only allows for lockstep agreement"-- fine. How big? How small? How far up does it rise in power? Conservatives have John McCane running for president-- very much AGAINST the "lockstep" of much of the party. How do you explain that along with the strain you speak of?

todd
actually mccain lost a point today and it is 49-46.

that is in the traditional model on gallup.

on the expanded model obama has a 51-44 lead.

this lead has been static for a month and now is starting to trend obama.

actually obama has been over 50 in most polls for the past month and mccain has never broken 50 except for the week immediately after the republican convention.

http://www.gallup.com/tag/Gallup%2bDaily.aspx


?
"-- at least not without the help of enlightened men --"

Now there is a turn of phrase that desperately needs clarification.

Kathleen: What, by your definition, is an 'enlightened man'?

dullhammer
what a pleasure to debate someone who is intellectually honest. i will try to do the same.

you ask a valid question.

as we both know, most conservatives did not trust mccain and only came on board when palin was announced.

to be specific though, simply read through this thread and it appears about 25% want to censor parker for not towing the party line.

now, i only can give you anecdotal evidence like the one i just mentioned but my experience here tells me that 25% is about right.

one of the most extreme examples was the war.

for the first 4 years of the war, anyone who was conservative that dared to challenge the bush adminstrations conduct of the war was called a traitor and accused of undermining the troops and supporting the enemy.

now to mccains credit, he was vocal.
in fact, he and biden were probably the most prescient about what needed to be done.

now like i said, that is the most extreme version of what i am referring to but if more conservatives would have had the guts to challenge bush, there may have been less american losses.

thanks again for your civil response.

So now we're in lockstep?
Keep talking Kathleen. I may not always agree or appreciate your point of view, I will continue to vote to give you the right to say it in any forum available.
I must take issue with your assessment of Sarah Palin....she's untrained, and lacking in political refinement....those belong to Hussein and her girlfriend Joe. I'd rather have someone willing to rip your head off and deficate down your neck than a Jimmy Carter look alike whose to afraid to stand up for his country.

LAURA BUSH RIGHT ON SARAH PALIN RIGHT ON
MICHELLE OBAMA!?FOR THE FIRST TIME,IM PROUD OF MY COUNTRY MICHELLE SAYS, BECAUSE MY HUSBAND IS ON THE TICKET !WHAT KIND OF DEAL IS THIS,WIERD O RAMA!

Apparently Laura Bush gets a good
coluum because she knows her place and hasn't been what KP considers pushy?

KP
is a great writer.
People are still upset when she bashed Palin. Unfortunately for most of her readers, what she said was true.

No bashing!
I don't want to bash Kathleen Parker, nor do I think she should be banned from TownHall. But murphdog(post #20), was the person who said it better than Goodmom.

POWER OF THE UNSEEN AND UNHEARD
It was so nice to read a story about how much good happens in the world through the efforts of good people who couldn't care less whether they get 'recognized'.

There is far more good news than bad in the world. Stories like this one can help break our addiction to bad news------so strange that we feel 'more alive' when alerted to tragedies as Walker Percy observed.

We do get more bang for our bucks when we minister to and educate women. Women naturally 'pay it forward' by educating their peers and children in their communities.

Women will save the world hand in hand with an emerging crop of men ---- reclaiming their birthright and responsibility to be Warrior-Poets.

Ah, the good news just keeps getting better....

Freedom Institute!
As a life-long Methodist, I have joined the fight to stop the Bush "library" from being built on the SMU campus.

Sadly, we failed.

Thanks to Laura's abuse of Eminent domain, low-income housing adjacent to the campus was destroyed to build this mockery.

Oh, well... at least we tried.

Parker
"Women, not men, will save the world."

You open your article with this, after trashing Sarah Palin for so long, following your claim that McCain only selected Palin because he had the hots for her. Ms. Parker, you are beginning to sound like a stereotypical college professor obsessed with genitalia. Empowering? Patriarchical? Sounds pretty leftist to me. Still care to claim you're a conservative?

"Indeed, it is widely understood among international humanitarian groups that the most effective way to reduce poverty and disease is to educate women."

It may be widely accepted, but that doesn't mean it's true. Education does not reduce disease or alleviate poverty. San Francisco is highly educated. Moldova is not. Guess which has a higher incidence of AIDS? Furthermore, education does not alleviate poverty. There is nothing about having a diploma that guarantees a good-paying job. The two are correlated, not causal. And with regards to education, study after study shows that we rank around the 30th most competent when it comes to education ourselves, even though we're the wealthiest. Other nations are far more studious and educated, yet don't have our wealth.

Lastly, as for government policy, I'm not interested in serving the rest of the world. Our government serves us. If and when we act in the rest of the world, our only actions should be militant, and those should be constrained to scenarios in which either we are attacked, or there is a gross violation of human rights.

Laura Bush may be admirable, but the reasons behind your admiration of her are perturbed.

Why is KP still on Townhall?
Katty, you are one incredibly annoying, neurotic, angry and bitter wench. Nobody here cares about your petty and malicious mind set.

too late
It may be that there is a thought or two worth my time here, so I clicked on old KP's article to give her one last chance.

But I find it impossible to drag my eyes through this pointless drek, because my brain won't let go of all the ugly things this woman wrote about Sarah Palin.

So, I admit I couldn't read this drek. Too much garbage under the bridge. I tried, but my mind wouldn't do it.

Laura Bush
Could she be the one bright spot of the last eight years?

And why does everyone here hate KP? She writes one honest article and is crucified for it. Truth hurts I know.

Parker is a jerk..
I didn't read the column. I can call her a jerk because I feel like it.

KP babbles boob bait
KP says: I abhor Sarah but I love Laura. Laura is a quiet force for compassionate conservativism while Sarah is unsophisticated and crass.

KP has opened a credibility gap as wide as the space between her ears.

Ahoy there Cristo, throw me a lifeline!

Townhall Welcomes Professor Laura Hollis
There is a new conservative voice here at TH.

Read her columns and give her your support.

Unlike Pseudo-Con Parker, Professor Hollis is the real deal!

This is a good article Ms Parker
You said some positive things about Laura Bush and brought to light some of her great accomplishments. I noticed you mentioned that you travelled with her to the middle east and "saw her in action". This same type of thing happened recently with 2 other people. Elain Lafferty, former editor in chief of Ms magazine, and a democrat, spent some time with Sarah Palin...in person. She wrote her opinions about Sarah in the LA Times, where she referred to Sarah as a "braniac", and not in a sarcastic way either. Here's a link which shows her article:

http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/10/sarah-palin-is -brainiac.html

I know you are no fan of Sarah Palin, but if a democrat is willing to spend time with her and write a positive article about her, in the LA Times of all newspapers...you know...the paper that won't release the video of Obama, Ayers, and Khalidi all praising each other, then maybe YOU should consider spending time with Sarah Palin. That way you can "see her in action" too. I think you should do this before you write another scathing and belittling article about her. Watching old interviews, reading and listining to other journalists' reports, and watching Saturday Night Live are not the same.

Good Article
RE:Robert...well said and ditto for me...

Parker, go on to the dailykos where
you belong. You arrogant snob ! After you trashed OUR Sarah Palin, now you crawl back like the snake that you are !
You are much better than all of US, you have the arrogant right to trash OUR Sarah Palin, at a critical time in the election, now we are suppose to welcome you back with open arms.. Like the ignorant fools you take US for.. No parker.. A liar can repent but the damage of the lie goes on....You trashed our Sarah, now we trash you, go on to dailkos where you belong !

Not Smearing Palin?
I guess this is one week that Parker's man didn't say, "Kathleen, why don't you wear a brunette beehive wig and Kowasaki 704 glasses? It would make you look younger, smarter and sexier."

Kathleen Parker belongs on Wash Post
This person is a flaming Liberal with all the biases, flights of fancy, feelings and downright nastiness of your typical Lib. You who protect/provide cover for her are either deluded, or are one of the occasional libs that drift on through.

I don't disagree with her in a knee jerk fashion. My liberal newspaper just can't seem to get enough of her, so I've read her tripe for a very long time. I don't stick head in sand just because i loathe the writer, but in K's case, I think this is the last time I read her. I'll just pretend she's a commercial/ad from here on and glaze over when I see her visage.

Columns on Republican VP nominee
You've made it perfectly clear that you're not a conservative thinker--just one of the many, many, many columnists in the D.C. circle trying to get noticed. Good luck--but, I don't think you've got any cred. Martha

What's Up
There's no mention of Palin anywhere in this article. What happened? Did your physician increase the dosage of Zoloft? Where's your idiotic rants about how your husbands thinks she is younger and hotter than you? On that subject, isn't it about time to update that photo of you? Seriously, when was that taken, in 1908? I saw you on the Colbert show and you don't look a day over 60. But on to another matter, did you really think people will forget about your Palin bashing and how you've lost all integrity of being a "conservative". Liberals who you're accustomed to may be stupid and forget but not real conservatives. By the way, do you really think liberals will like you afterward when they can just support a true flaming liberal columnist? Whatever the outcome of this election, people like you and Peggy Noonan, Brooks, Buckley, and the other neocons aka fake conservatives will be hated by both sides of the aisle. You've lost all integrity as a "conservative" columnist. Your career as one is finished. Go back to the kitchen and make your husband another turkey pot pie!

Joe T
I'll likely vote R this coming Tuesday, but I won't like it. R and D are now BOTH left of center, in my book; but R is not so far left.
----------------------------------------------
I agree with you Joe but there is one major item you should also include for righty voters to consider. Full blown leftward movement can be extremely hard if not impossible to recover from. Punish the GOP at our peril. The GOP regardless of their abandonment of our ideals is still the only party of the 2 that will move to the right, if we force them to. I admit they need to be punished for what they have done, but this is not the time. If Kerry was running I would say maybe but not the guy that is running now and definitely cannot allow the congress to have unfettered power. Good grief they are already smacking their lips over what they can do to us (disguised as for us). They already are wanting to take on the Union Secret Ballot issue and The Fairness Doctrine without evenb waiting for Obama to be sworn into office.

Keep Parker
Get rid of Don Juan.

Parker...
Look, we're busy. We stop for a minute to read clear desciptions and opinions and then go about our day. Parker is an unnessesary distraction. Lose her.

This is...
actually a decent piece by Kathleen Parker, for once. She doesn't really make a case for spending, so I will. I agree, wholeheartedly, with the First Lady's efforts. She should continue her very important work, if she so chooses. Her work should not be funded by the American taxpayer. Call George Soros. Tell him that if he really wants to do something worthwhile with his money, he'll support things like this. Tell all those whiny liberals in Hollywood to give to these causes instead of to the Democratic Party and Barack Obama. That would be infinitely helpful to the United States of America and women around the world.

Loren...
I understand why you might say both Republicans and Democrats are left of center, but I don't agree. Yes, there are many moderate Republicans who hold positions on certain issues with which I don't agree. One of those moderates is our nominee for President. However, on the majority of issue, across the party and, I believe, even for John McCain the lean is to the right, not left. Look at the whole platform, not just the few issues the media chooses to talk about on any given day. Does the party need to come back to the right, to some degree, on some issues? Absolutely. We can work toward that end with John McCain in the White House. You and I both know that Barack Obama won't be leaning to the right anytime soon.

To Pat in IN
You do not speak for all of the readers of TH. I read it daily, sometimes twice a day. I appreciate Ms Parker's articles. I respect her for being one of the few early Republicans who publicly said what many more were thinking privately about the nomination of Sarah Palin. Recently, many more well respected Republicans, former senators and governors, have voiced their concern about Palin, some going so far as to state they will be voting for Obama. I voted for McCain in the 2000 primary. Unfortunately, the 2008 version is not the same. He has become the "MS VISTA" of the republican party.

Just stopping in to give Kathleen
her one star, then leaving again. Will continue till she's no longer here.

Same here John.
I hate her.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.