Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Speak Correctly - or Build a Big Bunker
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- Allow me to introduce myself. I am a traitor and an idiot. Also, my mother should have aborted me and left me in a dumpster, but since she didn't, I should "off" myself.

Those are just a few nuggets randomly selected from thousands of e-mails written in response to my column suggesting that Sarah Palin is out of her league and should step down.

Who says public discourse hasn't deteriorated?

The fierce reaction to my column has been both bracing and enlightening. After 20 years of column writing, I'm familiar with angry mail. But the past few days have produced responses of a different order. Not just angry, but vicious and threatening.

Some of my usual readers feel betrayed because I previously have written favorably of Palin. By changing my mind and saying so, I am viewed as a traitor to the Republican Party -- not a "true" conservative.

Obviously, I'm not employed by the GOP. If I were, they're seriously in arrears. But what is a true conservative? One who doesn't think or question and who marches in lockstep with The Party?

The emotional pitch of many comments suggests an overinvestment in Palin as "one of us."

Palin's fans say they like her specifically because she's an outsider, not part of the Washington club. When she flubs during interviews, they identify with that, too. "You see the lack of polish, we applaud it," one reader wrote.

Of course, there's a difference between a lack of polish and a lack of coherence. Some of Palin's interview responses can't even be critiqued on their merits because they're so nonsensical. But even that is someone else's fault, say Palin supporters. The media make her uncomfortable.

Or, it's the fault of those slick politicos who are overmanaging her. "Let Sarah be Sarah" has become the latest rallying cry among my colleagues on the right. She'll be fine if we just leave her alone, they say. Between prayers, I might add.

Not all my mail has been mean-spirited. A fair number expressed polite disappointment; others relief and gratitude. Still others offered reasonable arguments aimed at changing my mind. I may yet.

In the meantime, this assault and my decision to write about it aren't really about me -- or even Sarah Palin. The mailbag is about us, our country, and what we really believe.

That we have become a partisan nation is no secret. This week has provided a vivid example of where rabid partisanship leads with the failure of Congress to pass a bailout bill vitally needed to keep our economy from unraveling.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave a partisan speech, blaming the credit crisis on the Bush administration (omitting the Clinton administration's role in launching the subprime lending debacle). Republicans responded by voting against the bill.

Everyone's to blame, by the way.

Such extreme partisanship has a crippling effect on government, which may be desirable at times, but not now. More important in the long term is the less tangible effect of stifling free speech. My mail paints an ugly picture and a bleak future if we do not soon correct ourselves.

The picture is this: Anyone who dares express an opinion that runs counter to the party line will be silenced. That doesn't sound American to me, but Stalin would approve.

Readers have every right to reject my opinion. But when we decide that a person is a traitor and should die for having an opinion different than one's own, then we cross into territory that puts all freedoms at risk. (I hear you, Dixie Chicks.)

I'm sure it is coincidence that, upon the Palin column's publication, a conservative organization suddenly canceled a speech I was scheduled to deliver in a few days. If I were as paranoid as the conspiracy theorists are, I might wonder whether I was being punished for speaking incorrectly.

Unfortunately, that's the way one begins to think when party loyalty is given a higher value than loyalty to bedrock principles.

Our day of reckoning, indeed, may be upon us. Between war and economic collapse, we have enormous challenges. It will take the best of everyone to solve them. That process begins minimally with a commitment to engage in civil discourse and a cease-fire in the war against unwelcome ideas.

In that spirit, may Sarah Palin be fearless in Thursday's debate and speak her true mind.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Kathleen Parker should step down
This column is not a very clever defense of her previous ones assailing the character, intelligence and preparedness of Governor Sarah Palin.

Parker (who evidently thinks very highly of herself and looks down on the rest of us from her perk) cherry picks a few of the more illiterate responses and leaves the reader to believe (or so Parker thinks) that all the responses were as unreasoned. Parker dishonestly leaves out the more convincing arguments such as those we can read here in abundance.

First is that Parker is wrong for so many reasons that we can read here over and over. Parker can’t delete those reasoned responses here that we will find mixed in with the Republican nuts and liberals.

Second, Parkers singular purpose, non-stop Palin-Bashing is obviously meant more to ingratiate herself to liberal news editors. I have never seen so many of Parker’s op-eds published before in my local rag – and all on the same subject. Parker’s appeal seems to be quite limited.

Three, Parker has a far lower standard of Biden. Biden had – and has -- all his facts wrong and yet it is Palin that is “over her head”.

Well on that last point Palin may indeed have to be four times as good as Biden to be considered his equal. Fortunately for our Sarah, that hasn’t proved difficult.

Parker should be asked to step down as a columnist for Town Hall. This website is for conservatives only. There are plenty of interesting, younger minds out there to take her place here.

Haters
Welcome to our world. Now you know how we liberals feel as the object of the putrid spewing of everyone from Ann Coulter on down to the illiterate trolls on our favorite websites. Thank you for speaking up on behalf of informed, intelligent debate.

PS
One more thing, Kathleen.

I hate to say this because I'm not mean and I'm not cruel, my intention is not to hurt you, but I have to say this because it's true and I believe it is something you really need to hear and consider, carefully.

There's an old cold war phrase, "useful idiot", if you know what it means no explanation is necessary, and if you don't, I suggest you look it up.

If you place that phrase in the context of my prior post I think you will see where I'm going with this, using the tools and narratives (dumb and evil) of the left, which are always designed to demonize, demean, mock, ridicule and marginalize conservatives.

You used their tools and their narrative to ridicule Sarah Palin, the cardinal sin, this is not lost on conservatives and it should not have been lost on you either.

Kathleen, what were you thinking?
Kathleen, assuming you have not experienced some kind of leftist epiphany, what on GOD's green earth were you thinking?

Don't you know the left "always" brands conservatives who make them feel threatened as dumb, evil, or dumb and evil?

Don't you know that is always the narrative they seek to create and they always cherry pick specific soundbytes to prove their point?

Do you really not know Ronald Reagan had to combat the exact same narrative and the exact same tactics?

Haven't you seen them do likewise with GWB for the past seven years, despite the fact that he is an Ivy leaguer who carried a higher GPA than Al Gore?

Don't you realize that you have in essence used the tools of the left to ridicule Sarah Palin and you have also given every leftist we battle every day an opportunity to say "you see, we told you so, even this conservative columnist agrees that Sarah Palin is an imbecile."

Didn't you realize you would be handing the left a loaded gun with that column, to shoot at "your friends" (assuming you really do consider us friends?), and that epitomizes the old adage, with friends like you who needs enemies?

I believe that's why you are seeing such a visceral reaction to your treachery, and make no mistake about it, that was an act of treachery and you do owe us all, NOT JUST SARAH PALIN, an engraved apology for arming our adversaries and placing us (and her) in this defensive position.

And Yes, you did in some small way give the left a license to mock and ridicule this decent Christian woman, unmercifully, because they could always say "even this conservative columnist agrees with us", and that is the part you should feel most ashamed of, assuming you really are still one of us?

Now do you see why we conservatives had to disown you? How you left us no alternative? What you did to this decent woman and all of us with that column? DO YOU SEE IT NOW?

Not Surprised
It is not surprising the response you recieved. Fox News has been running a non-stop propaganda campaign for years demonizing the left as lunatics who hate America and regularly shouting down anyone who disagrees with them. This isn't the American way, this is fascism.

The new Arianna Huffington
I remember well when Arianna Huffington was considered a "conservative columnist". She ended up finding more adoration from the left. Your column going after Sarah has me thinking that maybe you are going to take the "Dixie Chicks route" Good luck and good riddance.
Mark Adams
San Diego


thank me
i thank myself everyday i am not or will be like the disgusting poeple writing agaisnt this women. people like you are always asking for the truth but when you get it and it is not the turth you want you turn on those that gave it to. you all are a bunch of hypocrites. if she had written this way about pres. bush 8 years ago after his 1st few mistakes you would have reacted the same way. and now he is considered the wrost pres. in u.s history, even by republicans. i bet any money that the same people who wrote against her on this blogor in the last one are the same people who said that mccain is a bad rebuplican. again hypocrites

Criticism
Please. I am sorry you have had to endure the comments that you have. I am very sorry that the state of our nation is as it is. We conservative are so worried that we will have to endure 4 yeats of obame/biden, who would rather lie than tell the truth. You are still myu favorite columnest, and I think you are beautiful. By the way I enjoy it when you occasionally mention your family. But it may be dangerous to you and yours, considering the misguided people in our country. P{Lease do not change because of a few idiots.

Hey kingsXrulz!
Enjoyed your excellent critique of Kathy's article. In fact it was much better than her article!!!
Have heard several conservative radio people reference Kathy's attack on Gov Palin and most of their comments usually have the phrase " who the heck is this woman?"
It says Kathy has been a columnist for 20 years.

Who knew???? :)

I Wish I Had Read ...
...this article the day it came out, my comments would have been, "Kathleen Parker, you just wait "n" see."

Sarah Palin is not of the mainstream, but she is intelligent, honest, good, and has a love for America.

Sarah has suffered a lot, and I as a Christian identify with the persecution. She and her family have been attacked because of her goodness.

Barack has not gone through what Sarah has, plus he knew long before Sarah that he was going to run for office, so he had time to prepare, and he still can't talk.

They didn't find out that he wasn't articulate until the teleprompter broke, yet, they have to keep the lie up.

Palin comments
Kathleen

Thank you treating this as a Presidential Election and not a LifeTime movie of the week.

Sarah Palin's shortcomings are a fact and should not be ignored anymore than the inadequacies of Obama,Biden or McCain.

You can put lipstick on an elephant, but that won't get if out of the room.


Aye, she's a fair(?) Kathleen
"Readers have every right to reject my opinion. But when we decide that a person is a traitor and should die for having an opinion different than one's own, then we cross into territory that puts all freedoms at risk. (I hear you, Dixie Chicks.)"
-- 1) Only if it is acted upon. 2) There is no "we" that have decided that you are a traitor. The fact that one (or a few) voiced that opinion is NOT representative of all of us.

"I'm sure it is coincidence that, upon the Palin column's publication, a conservative organization suddenly canceled a speech I was scheduled to deliver in a few days. If I were as paranoid as the conspiracy theorists are, I might wonder whether I was being punished for speaking incorrectly."
-- Maybe you were. In the word(s) of Dick Cheney: "So?"

"Unfortunately, that's the way one begins to think when party loyalty is given a higher value than loyalty to bedrock principles."
-- Maybe if YOU had given higher priority to bedrock principles than political theater, this would never have come up.

"Our day of reckoning, indeed, may be upon us. Between war and economic collapse, we have enormous challenges. It will take the best of everyone to solve them. That process begins minimally with a commitment to engage in civil discourse and a cease-fire in the war against unwelcome ideas."
-- You need to institute a cease-fire in your privately initiated war of overreaction.

"In that spirit, may Sarah Palin be fearless in Thursday's debate and speak her true mind."
-- She did, once again proving your previous column completely wrong.

Kathleen Again
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave a partisan speech, blaming the credit crisis on the Bush administration (omitting the Clinton administration's role in launching the subprime lending debacle). Republicans responded by voting against the bill."
-- Funny how only ONE of the Republicans who voted against it actually said that this was the reason, while almost a third voted for it. Talking points don't usually result in substantive argument points.

"Everyone's to blame, by the way."
-- Not me.

"Such extreme partisanship has a crippling effect on government, which may be desirable at times, but not now."
-- The more you write, the thinner it gets. What about the 60 Democrats who voted against it, both on Monday AND again today?

"More important in the long term is the less tangible effect of stifling free speech. My mail paints an ugly picture and a bleak future if we do not soon correct ourselves."
-- And how has ANYBODY'S free speech been stifled in this case?

"The picture is this: Anyone who dares express an opinion that runs counter to the party line will be silenced. That doesn't sound American to me, but Stalin would approve."
-- You have been silenced HOW? Did someone telling you to shut up actually cause you to shut up? NO. So what the hell are you talking about?

Kathleen IV
"In the meantime, this assault and my decision to write about it aren't really about me -- or even Sarah Palin. The mailbag is about us, our country, and what we really believe."
-- How ironic. I'm commenting on your article as I read it, and here you acknowledge that your self-pity serves no purpose. And what some of us believe is that it is ridiculous for you to rest the entire election on Sarah Palin's shoulders. When has it EVER beeen the case that a VP choice decided the outcome of a presidential election?

"That we have become a partisan nation is no secret. This week has provided a vivid example of where rabid partisanship leads with the failure of Congress to pass a bailout bill vitally needed to keep our economy from unraveling."
-- That we have ALWAYS been a partisan nation is something that you have apparently forgotten. That you have jumped onto this "the bailout must happen immediately, otherwise there will be another Great Depression" bandwagon is another indication of how trendiness and surface appearences seem to be the prime factors in how you judge the political events of the day. It isn't the mere fact that you're wrong that is so disturbing . . . it's WHY you're wrong that's scary.

You, ma'am, are SHALLOW.

Kathleen Part III
"Of course, there's a difference between a lack of polish and a lack of coherence. Some of Palin's interview responses can't even be critiqued on their merits because they're so nonsensical. But even that is someone else's fault, say Palin supporters. The media make her uncomfortable."
-- She has her fair share of apologists. Lest we forget, Barack Obama has an ARMY of apologists.

"Or, it's the fault of those slick politicos who are overmanaging her. "Let Sarah be Sarah" has become the latest rallying cry among my colleagues on the right. She'll be fine if we just leave her alone, they say. Between prayers, I might add."
-- Do you not think that that is at least partially the case? that she is so on-guard against "gotcha" questions that she becomes defensive to a fault? I understand that it is necessary for her to perform well in order to attract undecided voters; but that does not mean she can't make any mistakes at all, let alone that she should be abandoned by someone like you who -- curiously -- does not bother to mention how closely your own political philosophy and stance on the issues meshes with hers.

"Not all my mail has been mean-spirited. A fair number expressed polite disappointment; others relief and gratitude. Still others offered reasonable arguments aimed at changing my mind. I may yet."
-- No one is holding their breath waiting on that outcome. This isn't about you.

More Direct Response To Kathleen
"Some of my usual readers feel betrayed because I previously have written favorably of Palin. By changing my mind and saying so, I am viewed as a traitor to the Republican Party -- not a "true" conservative."
-- That "true conservative" label is one that's generally applied by people with too narrow of a focus. However, it is the reason why you have changed your mind that is so disturbing. As if to be a polished political "actor" holds much more sway than to have solid core principles and a record of acting on them.

"Obviously, I'm not employed by the GOP. If I were, they're seriously in arrears. But what is a true conservative? One who doesn't think or question and who marches in lockstep with The Party?"
-- Again, it's your expressed distress over her so-called inability to perform, and your seeming to hold that aspect of her person in much higher regard than her record of actions and her stated core principles -- THAT is what causes people to question your motives.

"The emotional pitch of many comments suggests an overinvestment in Palin as "one of us."
-- Or a strong desire to win based on grave concerns over the alternative.

"Palin's fans say they like her specifically because she's an outsider, not part of the Washington club. When she flubs during interviews, they identify with that, too. "You see the lack of polish, we applaud it," one reader wrote."
-- Speaking of narrow-minded focus, have you documented the flubs and faux-pas of candidate Bambi & VP nominee Gaffe-O-Matic? Is it the fact that the MSM is zeroing in on her (surprise, surprise) that leads YOU to hold her to a standard of perfection?

Speak correctly or..
Although I disagreed with your assesment I fully support your right to change your mind. The column prompted me to take a hard look at if I could still support S.P. Not a thing wrong witha thought provoking column! I can't believe a speaking engagement was cancelled. At least one person at that event missed an opportunity for a face to face civil discussion on the topic. What a wasted opportunity.

Response To Kathleen Parker
"Allow me to introduce myself. I am a traitor and an idiot."
-- You may well bristle at the harshness of tone, but just remember that it was earned. You are a "traitor" to the ideal of substance over window dressing, by way of dismissing Sarah Palin as being nothing but surface glitz, when it is actually her conservative principles that are most attractive to her supporters.

"Also, my mother should have aborted me and left me in a dumpster, but since she didn't, I should "off" myself."
-- Anyone who wrote that is using the anonymity of the Internet to be a jerk.

"Who says public discourse hasn't deteriorated?"
-- Who says it was always so great in the past? It's an easy and dangerous leap to say that prior to expanded access (via forums such as this) things were better. That may be what has led several posters here to label you an elitist.

"The fierce reaction to my column has been both bracing and enlightening. After 20 years of column writing, I'm familiar with angry mail. But the past few days have produced responses of a different order. Not just angry, but vicious and threatening."
-- If you really believe in what you wrote, then you should ignore it. The fact that here you are, using your next column to defend the previous one . . .

What now?
Kathleen,
When you wrote your column, exercizing your rights as a columnist and an American citizen, were you suggesting that we now cast our votes for Obama? Does he fill the bill for you as
1. Qualified (He is less qualified than Sarah Palin)
2. The best man for the presidency?
I can't figure out exactly why you decided to blast away at the candidate who represents the party that you supposedly support. This is an extremely close election and sometimes it don't hurt to just keep your own counsel. I mean, even if you are convinced that Palin is inept, she is STILL just as qualified as Obama, if not more qualified. Your column just didn't make sense to me.
If you are in any way considering voting for Obama, then you need to just get off this website and go to work for salon.com.

Ms Parker, you're no idiot nor traitor
you are simply a elitist who doesn't have a clue about the ordinary Americans that this country is made of. Do yourself a favor. Quit your job and become a small town mayor, you'll have an amazing epiphany.

Aside from your political treachory,
your most serious cardinal sin was not doing due diligence as a reporter, all you had to do was check out what Gov Palin had done to reach the top in Alaska. Your a jealous, self righteous, elitist that was never going to vote for a woman like Gov Palin. From the moment you found out about her pro life views and that her education wasn't ivy league you were just looking for an excuse to vilify Gov Palin. Just like pro choicers Biden, and Pelosi in the catholic church it is good that you have been exposed and shamed for undermining the conservative movement.

You're not an idiot
Ms. Parker,
I have been reading your columns for a number of years and have usually found you not only intelligent but insightful. You're not an idiot, communist or any other nasty thing people wrote.

But, you were gullibly drawn in to what Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric wanted you to think and what they wanted all of us to think. You just fell for their trap.

Last night's debate proved that Gov. Palin was far more capable than the editing at CBS and ABC showed us. Many pundits think she 'won' the debate. Regardless of win or lose, she showed herself to be capable of giving and taking on a national stage with tough questions. She not only redeemed herself, she may have added a couple of points to McCain's score. But she cannot win this election; it's up to J Mc to do that.

Maybe it was just a moment of weakness on your part. It doesn't matter. When you fall off the horse, get back on.


Congratulations...
Ms. Parker,
Let me begin by checking up on your mental health state. You expended all of your professional capital on the (unwise) gamble that Gov. Palin would fail in the debates. How's that working out for ya'? But now for the real reason for my post...congratulations on being featured prominently and favorably in Al Jazeera! You have achieved your goal of notoriety, moving yourself from relative anonymity to certain irrelevance. It's fairly clear that your intentions were self-aggrandizement rather than sticking to core principles. I know this because raising our tax rates to 60% is not a core conservative principle. Raising spending to $1 trillion is not a core conservative principle. Surrender in the war on terror is not a core conservative principle. Your call for the Toracelli Option vis-a-vis Palin would do nothing but remove all chance for a McCain presidency, and ensure that these things take place. That is not the action of someone interested in core conservative principles. But you did gain a good bit of notoriety, even if you looked more than just a bit panicked, foolish and...what's the word I'm looking for...yes, incompetent. On the bright side, though, Al Jazeera loves you, the Citizens of the World love you, and the Denizens of the Obamanation love you. Hopefully you can parlay this into a successful career writing on the Daily Kos, because the bulk of your conservative readership will likely not take your panicked tones seriously from here on...and that's just not fair! Again, congratulations!

Get over it...
and next time don't let your jealousy of another accomplished woman cloud your emotions er, judgement.

You said: "(Palin) can't string two sen
tences together."
There were hours and hours of video of Palin doing so very well, but you decided to focus on her performance in front of snide leftists, which was then cut and pasted. She may have been 90% brilliant in their interviews, but you can be sure they showed all of the worst of what they got.

Anyhoo, I'm really sorry that you have come across a real woman, and are having trouble sleeping as a result. Try to get over it, and get a new job - you are worst than useless in this one, you're dangerous.

Pay attention
Gov Palin is a regular American woman who knows what we are going through and the challenges we face. She will stand up for us and fight for us. Unlike the Messiah (Hussein) she has a record of caring for her constituency.

She also did an awesome job at the VP debate and Ms. Parker you owe her and her supporters an apology.

Speaking Your Mind
Kathleen is an intelligent conservative that speaks her mind and expresses herself well.

John McCain wasn't among my top tier choices. Sarah Palin wasn't on my radar. But there are no "do-over's" in primaries. What we have is what we have, and we support them because they are by far the best option. We pray they will step up and provide what the country needs.

I believe the Palin selection was a good move. She brought energy back to the Republican Party. She opens doors that are needed to overcome the obstacles of a biased media, voter fraud, unions, Soros, and left wing activists.

For Kathleen there is a fear that Sarah Palin may not be up to that task. The fear is great because the stakes are so high. That fear came through in her writing and comments. The problem was that it provided talking points to assist the Democrats, the media and their activists an advantage, and from a respected conservative writers at that.

Conservatives expect fellow conservatives to provide support, or at least not undermine them. Kathleen crossed that line. She expressed her fears, and they are fears all conservatives feel. But harshly going public at this time was rash. We want McCain and Palin to succeed. We need them to succeed. They need our support to succeed. Expressing fear in this way can be a self fulfilling prophesy, and our country cannot afford these negative public expressions articulating those fears.

Palin did very well in the debate tonight. I am proud of her. Stepping aside was never an option, or at least an option that could be a winning one. Eat a little crow for a poor column and thought process, and get back up, dust yourself off, and positively approach your next article. Get back to doing what you do best. Expressing fear is not your strong suit! Fear is not positive with a way forward. Press on with insight expressed with a positive attitude.

Sorry no sympathy for you here Kathy,
you fell into the same trap the liberal dems fell into when Sarah baited the trap with a couple irrelevant main stream media interrogations. You folks rushed into bury her and she used your own force and words against you and now you liberals are all exposed morons. Yes your a liberal and it took big game hunting Sarah Palin to flush you out.

Awwwwwww Awwwwwwwwww
Poor Kathy she tries to get attention for herself by dissing Gov Palin and then when people respond she calls out the Waaaaamblance.

HugH Hewatt was funny tonight. He said he heard Kathy on Medved today and didnt have a clue who she was and he opined that when "Unknown" people say outrageous things its just to garner attention to themselves.

I believe Hugh is correct LOL


you reep what you sow Kathleen
How does someone who at the hight of the Dixi chick backlash wrote: "Maybe "faking it" for a living compels actors to do something real, sort of like performing their own movie stunts. Going political -risking the loathsome blacklist -makes them feel authentic In the process they mostly risk buying their own myths....Others are deluded into thinking that what they say and do is momentous. Or that expressing an opinion is tantamount to being dangerous"

now write: "when we decide that a person is a traitor and should die for having an opinion different than one's own, then we cross into territory that puts all freedoms at risk. (I hear you, Dixie Chicks.)"

honey you don't have a clue what it was like back in 2003, and 2004 to have an opinion different from the accepted one, heck today the neocon's rose is off the bloom and today it is absolutely safe to say those things. Plain and simple you are caching the tail end of the partisan venom which you yourself stoked.

Back in 2003-04 it was scary to disagree with the neocons back when people like you wrote:These bastards like Clark and Kerry and that incipient a$$, Dean, and Gephardt and Kucinich and that absolute mental midget Sharpton, race baiter, should all be lined up and shot.

Sorry for your attacks
I think that the media is to blame for the atmosphere in this country. You cannot complain about something that you have been a part of for years. I remember how they attacked President Regan all through the 80's as stupid; a cowboy and dangerous. He was blamed for everything from AIDS to the economic woes in 1987-1988. The right wing media attacked President Clinton all throught the 1990s. And look at what they did to President Bush in the last five years. The idea of you are somehow above the fray because you are a columnists. People are afraid and they will strike out at people that should be on their side of the issue. Gov. Palin did a bad job with the pomp queen of CBS - there is nothing we can say about that - it's true. And if she has a bad night tonight in the debate - it's over for her. And it's not because she's stupid or untalented. It's because she didn't have the two years of running that the men had in this race.


Wow
poor Kathleen. She's todays main course too!
The rabid right wing in all it's glory. You would think she turned into Maureen Dowd last week!

Is this the beginning of the right wing self destruct sequence? Oh please?


Ms. Parker...
Our sympathies... keep speaking your mind and please don't allow yourself to be intimidated by these despicable folks who wish you and yours harm. You are right, they are not the embodiment of Mericn ideals.

Today's conservatives aren't
The adoration of Sarah Palin by many so-called conservatives is easily explained: they're not conservativs, but are instead right-wing populists. Conservatism in the United States long ago lost most of the pseudo-aristocratic, upper-class, high-culture gloss best embodied in the late William F. Buckley, Jr. Today's conservatives, for the most part, have almost nothing in common with the sort of conservatism promoted and defended by the now nearly-forgotten intellectual big names on the right such as Russell Kirk, Richard Weaver, T.S. Eliot, the Southern Agrarians, and the like.

Right-wing populists celebrate the virtues and moral superiority rural America versus urban America, ethnically homogeneous America versus ethnically diverse America, blue-collar versus white-collar, and much more. Genuine traditional conservatism and right-wing populism may converge on specific issues, but the informing impulses that drive each of them are very far apart. Opposition, verging on hostility, to "bigness" and to beliefs, values, and lifestyles that are, from their perspective, alien and perverted are the marks of right-wing populists. They are "conservative" only in the sense that they belief that there was a time when their economic interests, their sets of beliefs, and their lifestyle were predominant in the U.S. They see all of this eroding because "they"--liberals, media elites, immigrants, gays, huge corporations, and globalization--are forces that they lack the power to control or eliminate.

Sarah Palin is the pin-up girl for these folks, and they are the ones attacking Ms. Parker. Palin embodies what they see as good and right about America, and they're not about to listen to anyone who rejects this.

In answer to KP's question
A short few days ago, KP wrote,

"In a rational world, this presidential election would be between Hillary Clinton and John McCain, with their respective running mates Barack Obama and (maybe) Sarah Palin... I love Barack Obama ...
I love Obama for his style, grace, intellect and his way with words. I want the healing power that an Obama presidency could deliver to this country."

Today, she asks, "But what is a true conservative?"

Let me help you out, KP: TRUE CONSERVATIVES DON'T LOVE OBAMA AND DON'T WISH FOR HILLARY.

Allow me to politely suggest that it is in fact YOU who are "out of your league and should step down."

Now a pity party?
Unbelievable! Stop feeling so self important, it's unbecoming. It makes you look like you've taken the poor "little woman" defense. You are taking women back to the dark ages by setting special rules when none are needed.

Duh! Of course you are entitled to your opinion. Why are you so surprised when someone has an opinion different than yours? You've been in this business a long time. Did you really think that you would get a lot of positive comments from your previous article? At what point did you think that all Conservatives would follow you in lock step? Sorry that you couldn't handle the feedback. I thought journalists had thicker skin than this?

Bottom line... I think many of us were truly surprised that you felt this way. No big deal. (Your opinion that is.) Move along folks, nothing to see here except more Palin bashing.

Go Sarah Palin! Ignore all of the narrow minded naysayers and kick Biden's butt in the Debate tonight.

Kathleen: Whaaaaa!
"Anyone who dares express an opinion that runs counter to the party line will be silenced."

Really? How did you sneak this column past the censors?


"That doesn't sound American to me, but Stalin would approve."

News flash: Stalin used the Government to silence those with "an opinion that runs counter to the party line"


As far as extreme partisanship having a crippling effect, GOOD! When somebody can not admit that they're a major part of the problem, why should they be trusted for the solution?

When the fox was in the henhouse, several shelves collapsed, killing additional chickens and crushing a lot of eggs. We need to bring in the fox so it can figure out a way to shore up the shelves. Yeah, that's the ticket!

Resorting to liberal sliming tactics
I would like to remind conservatives who gave into their emotions, the major problem of liberals that we are conservatives. We discuss our views in a civil and articulated manner. Resorting to threat and vicious invectives is found on liberal blog sites.

Ms. Parker expressed a concern felt by several conservative commentators regard Gov. Palin's being ready for prime time politics as founded on shows like Charles Gibson and Katie Couric. What I saw was not the Sarah Palin I saw being announced by Sen. McCain that Friday night in Ohio and at the Republican National Convention.

Having lived in Alaska in for five years I know the spirit of the Alaskam citizens. They are a rugged people with frontier America values. Ms. Palin is our silver lining in a very stormy dark wall cloud above Washington D.C.

It is my view that God has given this errant people of his another chance in the form of Sarah Palin. If anything we should be in prayer for her success tonight against the real evil in the country, liberalism and the Washington establishment that is selling us out for personal gain. Let's direct some of that righteous indignation against the current establishment and their fat cat special interest friends that got us into this mess.

Ms. Parker is an ardent supporter of conservative values and has done a great job exposing the real 'enemy of the state'. If we want real change we come together as the 'silent majority' at the polls and affect that change. Neither Barack Obama or John McCain is goint to change things as part of the Washington establishment problem not the answer. Sarah Palin on the other hand will. She is our voice. My vote is going to be for her not for Mr. Bipartisan pro quid quo.

The Turban Torpedo

Palin and the Bailout
It took me a number of years at a college in Atlanta to accept the fact that all conservatives weren't stupid and all conservatives weren't republicans. I still think most republicans are, in fact, idiots.
McCain has never been the brightest bulb on the tree and his fondness for shooting from the hip and his and gut instinct are laudable as long as he's the only one who will suffer. With the Palin, his desperation to get the ex Hillary voters is laughably dangerous for the rest of us. The lady is no doubt bright and energetic, she's simply not ready.

Palin and the Bailout
I am disappointed that anyone would confuse conservatism with the republican party. There are some conservatives in the party who are trying to save it, and the country. We may need a plan to "rescue" the financial markets; we DO NOT need this plan. We do not need more government intrusion into the private sector. We do not need any Secretary of Treasury having unlimited(?) power to "ensure the financial stability" of Americans. We surely do not need the same idiots who broke the system in the first place, allowed to "fix" it. As to Palin, she messed up with Couric pretty badly, and possible reasons abound. She did well with Hannity and Hewitt, and they both asked tough questions. Let's hope she aquits herself very well tonight. Conservatism and America needs someone who is willing to fight for us. She just mat be that person.

Double standard on Palin
Ms. Parker. I deeply respect you views and you are a good thinker. On this one, you fell into a trap set by the MSM. Do you think Obama and Biden could stand up to the scathing attacks and cross examination directed at Palin. And how is Obama more qualifed to lead the free world then Palin? His resume and experience are at least as shallow and way more toublesome.
In politics, one must consider the alternative. We rarely ever get a perfect choice. And there are examples of leaders with great moral character but zero experience rising to the occasion- George Washington, for example. God bless you and I am sorry for some of the emotional reactions. But you have given aide and comfort on this one to people who do not share you values, just as they had hoped.

Vitriolic liberal Republicanism
These vitriolic personal attacks against Kathleen Parker are a reflection of the degenerates that continue to enable big govenment Republicanism.

Thanks for speaking the truth Ms. Parker - you're a true conservative!

Kathleen Parker: STILL full of CRAP
I love these two bits from Kathleen Parker's latest column, so pitiful that they actually make me laugh. She writes (quote)...

"I'm sure it is coincidence that, upon the Palin column's publication, a conservative organization suddenly canceled a speech I was scheduled to deliver in a few days. If I were as paranoid as the conspiracy theorists are, I might wonder whether I was being punished for speaking incorrectly."

This is Parker at her most hypocritical. Parker loves to argue on behalf of free speech and the right to disagree over something -- hell, that was the whole POINT of her editorial. So here's a newsflash for you, Kathleen: it's NOT a coincidence. However, it IS a demonstration of a group practicing THEIR right to free speech by saying "We don't agree with you, and we certainly don't want to PAY to disagree with you." Which seems to be a rational decision to cancel her appearance.

But only a dope like Parker would think she should get to say what she wants AND get to collect whatever money and fees she wants, as if NO ONE can disagree with HER now. What a moron...

She also wrote: "Unfortunately, that's the way one begins to think when party loyalty is given a higher value than loyalty to bedrock principles."

Yeah, you're right, Kathleen. No need to stand by the party. Regardless of your disagreements with Palin, you're going to be doing SO much better and be SO much happier with a socialist like Obama in control.

Like I said...what an utter moron this woman is. Seriously, why do papers even print articles from a woman who can't even put proper logical conclusions together?

Sarah Palin's Record
Ok Ms. Parker. I would like you to do a little experiment. Go into the Washington Post website and search for Palin Alaska Gasline Inducement Act. Then do the same for the New York Times. Now do the same with Palin and Troopergate or Palin and Bristol or Palin and banning books and see what you find. Now ask yourself these very simple questions: How can you evaluate Sarah Palin’s fitness for the Vice Presidency without understanding what she did with AGIA? Then ask yourself why the Post and the Times don’t really want to talk about her legislative record in Alaska? Finally ask yourself, as a voter should I base my opinion of Sarah Palin on how well she handles questions from Katie Couric or how she handled a major legislative endeavor?

I suppose there was some benefit to you. The Post hardly ever features your columns, but write a couple columns bashing Palin and suddenly you are front page on the Post’s website twice in a row. Coincidence? I think not. Bashing Palin seems to have become quite a cottage industry for you. Too bad you didn’t bother to learn anything about her real record.


My point?
If you are not used to taking any heat for what you say or believe, perhaps it is because you do not say or believe the truth.

That's not to say that all people who draw criticism for their comments speak the truth, but it is a certainty that a Christian will be HATED for proclaiming the Gospel. It's not just a sociologically verifiable fact, it is a prophesy from the lips of JESUS Himself.

In the Gospel of Luke, He said:

"All men will hate you because of me." Gospel of Luke 21:17


The Gospel of John records this remark by Christ:

"If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first." Gospel of John 15:18

Also in the Gospel of John, He said:

"If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you." Gospel of John 15:18-20

Since Ms. Parker has made it well known that she disapproves of 'too much religion' in political campaigns, I think it is safe to assume that she has never gotten too much flack for being a Christian, since she seems to believe such things are private affairs.

While I feel regret and sympathy for anyone receiving anonymous internet abuse, which is all too rampant, I hope it will give Ms. Parker a bit more insight into what the TRUE Christian walk entails, and might perhaps soften her rather harsh attitude towards the prominent involvement of committed Christians in public affairs.

Kathleen, you're WHINING!!!
Why, oh, why is it that certain people get SO bent out of shape the minute they start drawing any heat?

Oh, I know! Because they are NOT USED TO IT!

Ms. Parker, try, just try, being an openly devout Bible-believing fundamentalist Christian, someone who doesn't just CARRY a Bible to church on Sundays, and leaves it laying around on the mantlepiece for visitors to see, but ACTUALLY READS IT, BELIEVES IT, EVERY WORD OF IT, and OPENLY PROCLAIMS IT - on the internet, no less!

Then see what kind of email you get!

CL
If you don't believe in them you should.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, then tis dreamed of in our philosophy".
Bill Shakespeare

"There are some things in this world you just can't explain." Charlie Daniels.
Didnt they just discover a cult down south doing the human sacrifice thing?

OK, CL, no I'm not tarring you with Jerry's brush. And yeah "speaking the truth in love" and "let your speech always be with grace" means we SHOULD seek "oneness of mind."

And I'll quit laying into you.

BUT, My main premise remains, and I'm sticking TO it that 1. SOME IDEAS SHOULD BE SILENCED! Racism, black or white for instance. IslamaNazism for instance. and 2.It was the BAD ideas that KP REFUSED to SILENCE in her lib friends that GOT us in this MESS!
So I regard it as not only DIS-cogent, but HYPOCRITICAL on KP's part to cant this crap about "coming together" while accusing people who are SCREAMING at her THAT'S the BAD IDEA that GOT US HERE! of wanting to SILENCE her.
At some point BAD ideas SHOULD be silenced, CL.
Otherwise, morons put them into affect and they blow up and KILL EVERYBODY! Read H.Beam Piper's short story "Day of the Moron."

You have been gracious and a gentleperson CL.
night.
TBM

poor thing
Undoubtely Ms. Parker was sitting with Sen Biden when he heard Franklin D. Roosevelt make his speach on TV in 1929.
A professional journalist like you should know and understand that your oponion will at times be questioned and at times receive some hard comments. What you dislike about Gov. Palin happens to be what us "red necks" or Texans like about her. She speaks from her beliefs and not from words some professional writer puts on a teleprompter. At 81 years old I think I know a little about politics but I honestly never heard Pres. Bush announce a Bush doctrine such as Monroe and Truman did.
As far as Gov. Palin's answer about the Fail Out I have listened for weeks and dont really know what it is except what supporters of one side or the other have spinned. I do know they tell me there is no credit but yet I still get offers of credit cards every day. Citi Bank has ever offered me a $4,500 loan if I just come to the bank and get it.
Ms. Palin is not a phoney and does not give scripted answers. I had rather have her explaination than than Biden's about that speach he heard FDR.
Undoubtely you could not have written a second article had you not received some hate mail So if you cannot stand the heat.....stop writing or at least ask Sen Obama some questions about himself \

CL concluded
What your plea for togetherness is inherently unwilling to engage, CL is the idea that SOME ideas are INHERENTLY DESTRUCTIVE to LIFE and LIBERTY and MUST BE OPPOSED BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY!! You reject, albeit perhaps unthinkingly, Augustine’s Just War Doctrine that SOME inaction is a WORSE evil than Violent Action. You would limit to the point of ineffectiveness and therefore render worthless, our baptismal vows to “resist evil, injustice, and oppression in whatever forms they present themselves.” You demand proactive deeds of mercy here and now, but leave the pro-active deeds of Justice and Restraining of Evil–also God ordained, to the hereafter.
In short, you don’t take responsibility for the actual EFFECT of your IDEAS!
You are unwilling to admit the possibility that some of your ideas might be SO harmful to people that the JUST course is to SILENCE them!

The essence of Liberalism is the Redistribution of Wealth by force. Its EFFECT is to destroy Liberty, Prosperity, Opportunity and to create a permanently dependent SLAVE class based on Class Hatred, Envy and Covetousness. THAT is what it ACTUALLY DOES, along with Creating TYRANNY by The State! I defy you to undergird ANY of that with CHRISTIAN Doctrine.

How's that for subtle and nuanced?
Mick

the big mick
i cede the cogency issue to you as it takes a while to decode your writing.

i love the irish in fact, i am married to a lovely irish lass.

see already we have more in common than you think.

big mick, guilt by association is not american, as an irishman you should understand that because as you pointed out, irish faced much discrimination when they reached these shores.

no irish need apply was in most store windows for many years.

there are religious crazies on the left and right.

have you seen the video of an african minister laying his hands on palin in her church and calling on God to protect her from witches.

its out there on you tube.

so does that mean palin believes in witches?

of course not,

just like obama doesn't believe the things wright ranted and raved about.

Good shot sue. ATT CL 11:39
Well, CL, your fellow “liberal” (and I refer you to my The Big Mick blog on TH for why I reject that “terminological inexactitude”) “Christian” Jerry Wright would NOT agree, he says “No, No, No, God DAMN, America! To the thunderous amens and cheers of more “ChristianLiberals.”
I’d be interested in how you think Jerry is supposed to “come together” with me, CL.
And I mean it just THAT way. How people who talk like you expect ME to come together with Jerry I have heard often before. And rejected. My people took the jobs it was too dangerous to have an expensive black slave do. I invite you to check out the VA ed. site on The Irish in America. We were LOWER than Jerry’s folks. I don’t owe him and his nothin.

But before I say goodnight, let me point out that it is the cognitive dissonance INHERENT in your handle C.L. that is the SOURCE of your lack of cogency HERE.

cont.
mick

Speaking Correctly
Kathleen Parker,
I read all the bad comments people made about your column on Sarah Palin not to mention you personally.

You must feel like a tasered ten year old.

I still like Sarah Palin. Go Figure? I must be clinging to my guns and Bible here in PA.


No they didn't CL
They FOUGHT a WAR and KILLED PEOPLE!!!
They ones that DIDN'T AGREE with Independence got KILLED or LEFT!
What part of that escapes you?

When they were GONE--SILENCED--THEN the Nation "came together." And even AFTERWARDS there were issues! Forget about the WHISKEY REBELLION?
How about the CIVIL WAR? Exactly HOW did we "come together" to free the slaves? How was Lincoln's WAR "to save the union" NOT a SILENCING of the "unwelcome idea" of States' Rights?

Tell me, CL, are there ANY "unwelcome ideas" that MIGHT be worthy of threatening the purveyor with Violence? Nazi Master Racism? The Jewish Problem? Japanese Racist Imperialism?
White Supremacy? Anything at all? Or are we supposed to "come together" on everything?
NO ideas at there that by there very NATURE threaten our Lives and Liberty?

At bottom, CL, you simply accuse others of Irrationality simply because they find YOUR ideas lacking in cogency.
I, on the other hand, believe in my State Motto.
Liberty standing ON the DEAD BODY of Tyranny.
"Sic semper tyrannis."

mick


The Big Mick
as usual you subtle and nuanced in your response.

i will address a few items.

you are correct, insults are not attempts at silencing the opposition.

but consistently there are posters who either say "kill all the liberals"
or threaten my person with physical violence.

that is what kathleen parker was referring to.

my name is an oxymoron only if you believe God has spoken directly to you and told you this is so.

otherwise your judgement on matters of religion is no better than mine.

i have studied american history my friend, in fact, i have read the letters to the editor in the Boston newspaper the week of july 4th 1776.
when you really study history you go back and read the writers of the time, the diaries of wives of the great men and all sorts of sources.

i have spent much time doing so.

now,i wasn't going to write a book on it but i certainly implied that there were very contentious incidents.

but my point still stands,

despite fisticuffs and threats of violence they came together in the end and changed the world.

there is however, one thing we can both agree on.

May God Bless America




Ms Parker
When our great country first started, it was the common man who went to Washington to do their best for the fledgling Republic. I am not a history scholar, but I believe they had short terms. Today, however, it's now a life long career and totally out of touch with us "common grunts" who put in long hours to have the basics in life. Those in the new "Hollywood Washington" look down at us serfs and Palin. It's with shock and horror the movers and shakers of D.C. along with the MSM look down on Palin. She has every right to be part of the ticket to try and straighten out our current state of affairs.
She is not part of the machine like Nobama and his puppet masters are. We need to get our heads out of the clouds and get back to reality.
A vote for Nobama is a vote for socialism/communisim and the end of our country as we know it.
Oh, almost forgot...Ms Parker, please explain why Nobama gets the softball questions and leg tingling commentators ? If Sarah had said the 57 states comment she would have been roasted for days if not weeks for it. I'd like to see the magnifying glass put to Nobama, but he is just a puppet and would burst into flames !

Rowly 7:57
thanks my man. God save the good work.

The Big Mick

Chrislib 8:51
You might want to do a little reading about The Adams’ boys, the Sons of Liberty, Tax Collectors Tarred and Feathered and Run out of Town on a Rail, Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys, the Boston Tea Party etc. before you make the case Our Founders couldn’t relate to threatening a Tory’s life and property.
Telling you your point is dis-cogent, unsupportable and makes no sense cannot be construed as an attempt to silence you, CL. Telling you you’re talking nonsense cannot be construed as an attempt to silence you.

TALKING STUPID does do a damn good imitation of trying to silence YOURSELF, though.

Both you and KP take yourselves WAY to seriously. To tell somebody what they say is a load of crap is NOT the same thing as rejecting opposing ideas or points of view. Rejecting CRAP because it IS Crap–or more precisely because it doesn’t have the balls to be bull or the substance to be sheite–UHF4-CH4-is simply THAT, rejecting CRAP. To reject CRAP is NOT to reject “unwelcome ideas”–it’s to reject CRAP!

When you and KP figure out that not all ideas or arguments are created equal, then maybe you will come up with something worth listening TO!
Plus, CL, ADULTS know when you chose the IDEA you chose the CONSEQUENCES.
KP’s Idea, her PROFESSED reasons for it, and her HIDDEN AGENDA were ALL BAD IDEAS
to her audience and she was told so. She makes her living as an opinion shape-er. Obviously this time she failed. That’s HER screw up. Not a Stalinist attempt to silence her.
The way you two act one suspects you believe people have an obligation to laugh at BAD jokes simply because YOU tell them
tbm

Christian Lib 8:51
Aside from the fact I regard your handle as an oxymoron--The essence of comiqr-ism--see my blog on TH The Big Mick for the etymology of the terminological exactitude "comiqr"---the essence of cmqrism is the Redistribution of OTHERS' wealth--ONE of the applications of Christianity is the redistribution OF YOUR OWN!

but aside from that. Telling KP she is full of sheite cannot, by any rational cogent person, be said to silence her. Neither can a client saying "you aren't as advertised" and canceling a engagement be construed that way.

Telling Palin to withdraw, however IS an attempt to Silence her and those of us who are ONLY voting for Mack the Knife BECAUSE of her.

Thus me pointing out that YOU are full of sheite is not at attempt to silence you--it is an attempt to explain TO YOU why YOU are INEFFECTIVE at getting us to LISTEN to you!

Those are two different things, as any cogent rational person will tell you, CL!

You don’t like silence? Come up with something worth listening to.

The Big Mick

MEET THE NEW TOKYO ROSE!
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE48S8JW2008092 9?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=10279

Kathleen Parker wrote an article that was otherwise not worth reading except that 1. it appeared in National Review, and 2. She called on Palin to step down.
Now the old media are using Parker to bludgeon Palin. The Reuters article cites three elements that paint a troubling picture for Palin. 1. Tasergate 2. The media have piled on 3. 'Conservatives' are starting to pile on.

THAT IS IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There is no Reuters article without Kathleen Parker's stupid piece. "Tasergate" is a left wing lynching, and old news, and no one takes seriously a media article saying a politician is in trouble because the media is piling on her. There is no article without Parker. Brooks has zero credibility with conservatives, they couldn't have done it with him alone. Parker doesn't either, especially after this, but now Reuters had two names to throw in - National Review and Brooks.

Is this what Parker pictured unfolding? How about an apology for throwing blood in the water when the old media fish were already circling? Parker owes Gov. Palin a tearful apology. It matters not a whit that she thinks she was speaking truth. NO GOOD COULD COME OF IT so it amounts to piling on a good person who has already been mercilessly abused.

Did she suppose that McCain might throw away all of the interest generated among women? Is he supposed to put another woman on the ticket? A minority? Parker is THOUGHTLESS or MAD.

Palin leaving would probably be seen as a vindication of the old media's nastiness, insuring more of the same.

The left now loves Parker, and most of the right would rather never hear another word from her, ever. If Obama wins and this Parker insanity plays any role in it, she's the new Tokyo Rose.

TOTA

Palin is the equivalent of ...........
The Great White Hope.Since Bush turned out to be the worst president in our nations history the right was looking for a new conservative hero.McCain ain't the one so when Palin was picked the right looked more on image than substance.Whatever you say about Obama he was Columbia,Harvard Law,college professor,community organizer (like Jesus!)state and US Senator and 19 months of public scrutiny.Palin ain't got the smarts to get at this high of position.

Sarah Palin
You really don't understand !!
Good Bye !!!!

Doy

CNN and REUTERS are CITING YOU, MUTT!!!
You're famous! Wow, what a sensation you are! You are really making waves! Have all of your dreams been realized?
CNN today is citing you by name, putting you at the lead of a "conservative" cabal trying to get Palin to step aside. Good job. These people are trying to destroy her as a human being and as a credible leader. It was in that environment that you wrote your pathetic article. That makes you a nasty person, at the least.

"WE PICK UP THE HEAVIEST BURDERN, SELF-JUSTIFICATION, AND SET DOWN THE LIGHTEST, SELF-REPROACH."
4th century monk

I DON'T ACCEPT PARKER'S PREMISE..
Parker writes about "...the failure of Congress to pass a bailout bill vitally needed to keep our economy from unraveling."

Excuse me, but the mess was caused by government intervention in what should be a free market. Now she advocates "fixing" the problem by giving $700 billion - oh, wait, the Senate just minutes ago added $100 billion in "goodies" to the bill - to those who made stupid investments? Sorry, let those investors lose their shirts, we need to "cull the economic herd." A tough recession would be worth it; I don't care if I lose more money in the market.

Is Palin an ideal candidate? No, but at least she's not a socialist. We CANNOT AFFORD a socialist in the White House. America will cease to exist on January 20 if Obama is elected.

No, Palin is not an ideal candidate. But the media could at least ask her a few of the questions they have asked Obama, like "What's your favorite flavor ice cream?" Why does the media have to look through Alaska garbage dumps hoping to find Palin receipts from shopping at Wal-Mart? Can't they investigate Obama's failures, lies, and 30 year associations with communists, socialists, criminals, influence peddlers, and Pentagon bombers? Why has he gotten a free ride? Clearly, the media is in the tank for Obama.

On January 21, Obama's thugs will start collecting your guns. That gives us less than four months to move to Texas or Alaska and secede from the Union.

http://colony14.net/id11.html


Compared to Obama
If only Gov. Palin had taken the last 19 months away from her job to campaign for VP, she would do much better in those interviews I'm sure.

Maybe then Parker would give her a second look?

Pardon me Ms. Parker
There seems to be an assumption by those in the journalistic profession, that the opinions, answers, format of same and ennunciation all must pass their critique, as worthy of an acceptable response to a question or position on an issue.

Kudos Ms. Parker for standing your ground with respect to your personal evaluation but what you don't get is that we don't hold that assessment to the same standard as you.

Ms. Parker, if you have issue with an answer Gov. Palin gave to a question, present your argument, but leave your personal assessment as to her suitability for the position she has been nominated for, based on that personal assessment, out of it.

Bottom line, the media has decided that how we interpret an answer, an inflection, a hesitation or an aversion to an invasive question posed the media falls unto them to explain to us not so smart non-journalistic types.

We think for ourselves Kathleen, but I guess you may have just been informed of that fact.



Liberals Sneer,Americans Cheer
A very appropriate column by Michelle Easton is in Investors Business Daily today,titled Liberal Sneers, America Cheers.

It really balances this stupid column by Parker.

ms. parker

i admire your courage not only for the first column but for this one.

as a liberal who posts daily on townhall i have found many intelligent and articulate conservatives who are open to opposing ideas.

they understand that this is the esscence of democracy.

if we don't exchange opposing ideas and arguments, we are failing our founding fathers who argued and fought bitterly to create this country.

yet never-the-less they forged the greatest document and greatest country in the history of the world.

our debates and arguments are petty compared to what they accomplished yet they found common ground despite the angry rhetoric.

on the other hand, there are some disturbing instances here where a minority angry conservatives threaten bodily harm towards those who would offer opposing points of view.

it is fascinating to me that those same posters always accuse the liberal media and liberals in general of oppressing freedom of speech.

at any rate, be comforted by the idea that those who would silence you are not real conservatives but intellectually dishonest partisans.




The Big Mick
As I was reading your post to nmi I thought about what you said about Palin being the ONLY reason you would support the ticket.

That is the very reason the left is trying so hard to discredit her. As long as we were down on McCain,the trolls were here but were not so rabid as now.

They now have a vendetta and will not stop until she resigns from the sheer weight of the piling on. That is their purpose for living now.

I hope she has the guts,and I think she does,to see this thing out. Anything can happen.

The real truth of what Obama is may become so apparent,the MSM will have to cover it. I hope and pray that is the case. Thanks for your posts, they are truthful (( and funny.))

Gov. Palin has experience, not Obama
Governor Palin has more foreign policy experience than Gov. Bill Clinton did when he was running for president.

And she has experience in governing. Your man Obama does not = zip, zero, nada. You don't expect him to step down.

John inside the loop 6:01
And Thus speaks the DC gentility.

mick

John 6:01
Thus gentility contributes substance to the debate.

mick

Sarah
Kathleen
I have read most of the posted comments and thought about your comments on Sarah and your reactions to the posted comments. For what it is worth, your comments on Sarah are more than disappointing, they are disturbing. I'm not sure why you have changed your opinion about Sarah, but your new view is not well received by this reader and your whining about the comments on your writing is very disappointing.

You have indicated you had a rough childhood.
I wonder if you ever were whipped like some of us, bloodied, or got oh so many cheap shots playing competive sports in high school, college or later. We weren't promised a rose garden in life. If we (you) get into the "ring", on the field, on the court or into
the competitive business arena we know that the game may be rough.

You have expressed your thoughts, your opinion on Sarah. Many of us do not agree with you, but would fight to death to defend your right to express your opinion. Something tells me Sarah would fight for your right to express your opinion.
Do you believe BHO or Crazy Joe will do better than the soccer mom? She is better qualified than the Chicago south side communist or the fabricating Crazy Joe. Yes I have strong opinions also. Do you defend my right to my opinion? Would you fight to death to defend my right? I'm not sure. And I'm not sure just who you are...what a disappointment.

We need someone to shake up D.C.
Let her have a chance...she can only do better than the three clowns from the Senate.
WE NEED CHANGE...Sarah is the right change
for this troubled time. I reject my Ivy League
and exclusive private schools indoctrinations and applaude and support Sarah.
I pray that you will.

yogi bear

Shameful!
I'm sorry to hear that you've been receiving e-mails like that. That's the kind of language liberals use not conservative's. I have to say I watched parts of the Couric video online and unfortunately got the same impression. That was a rather sizeable disappointment for me since as a conservative I had no intention of voting for either one of these crap weasels and Palin was the only thing I've found even remotely interesting in the last 6 years that this election has been going on. The debate will either be her bounce back or her death nail. We'll see.

Sarah Palin
All pathetic personal parsing and prevarication aside, boohoo for your narcissism. Maybe some simply take great umbrage with your imperious impatience. You've probably been around a lot longer than Sarah, huh?

Peter, Tucson


you ARE an idiot, Ms Parker!
You should just march over to the Dem side and ask for the kool aid special.

Obama's Angel of Light

Democrats are saying Palin doesn't even have experience as a 'Community Organizer' like Marxist Obama did, she wasn't even taught by Communist Saul Alinski.

Democrats are saying Palin may have executive experience but Obama has speeches.

Democrats are saying Palin never left her babies to die in a 'Dirty Linen' closet like Obama has fought so hard for - how can she understand the 'Obama Hope'?

Democrats are saying Palin was never 'Mentored' by 'God Damn America' black racist Jeremiah Wright - how can she understand the plight of the ordinary black American?

Democrats are saying Palin never voted present 129 times - how can she bring the political experience Obama has to the White House?

Democrats are saying Palin doesn't understand the 'Bitter Clingers' like Obama - the typical whites who cling to 'God and Guns'.

Democrats are saying Palin doesn't even have 'Cult Followers like Obama, who believe Obama is the messiah and will heal the world.

Democrats are saying Palin has a husband who has always been proud of America, how can she understand those like Michelle Obama who was never proud of America.

Democrats are saying Palin thinks babies are wonderful how could she understand the 'Baby Mistakes' Obama talks about.

Democrats are saying Palin has worked at real jobs, how could she understand the plight of Obama who has never had a 'real job'.

Democrats are saying Palin might bring real values to America not the phony ones they believe in - Democrats are afraid!

Democrats are say Palin doesn't even send an 'Angel of Light' to guide voters like Obama does.

"... a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany ... and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama" - Barack Obama Lebanon, New Hampshire.
January 7, 2008.

The "Elite" Kathleen Parker has spoken
From Joe 6-pack: We don't need a Katie Couric cocktail drinker from Columbia in the whitehouse.
Palin is one of us... Parker should consider joining the Obama team.