Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Politically Incorrect Domestic Violence
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The words "domestic violence" typically invite images of bruised women and children -- and male perpetrators.

But the real picture of domestic violence isn't so clear-cut. And the solution to family violence is far more complex than our current criminal justice approach can handle.

For about 30 years now, we've been throwing money and punishment at domestic violence with not enough to show for it. Estimates are that more than 32 million Americans are affected by domestic violence each year, with many of those in need of help never reporting their abuse.

These are among the important findings of Linda Mills -- attorney, social worker, survivor of a violent relationship, as well as professor and senior vice provost at New York University -- whose new book, "Violent Partners," tackles the myths of domestic violence and suggests new ways of dealing with the problem.

One of the primary myths -- and the one that meets with the most resistance -- is that only men are violent. As I point out in my own book, "Save the Males," women and children indeed suffer the worst injuries and more often die as a result of those injuries. But women initiate violence as often as men.

Ignoring or downplaying that fact both obscures the real problem of intimate violence and makes solutions less likely. Yet even people who know better are afraid of speaking up lest they be accused of undermining feminist efforts to help women and children in danger.

Feminism deserves credit for putting domestic violence on the radar back when what happened in a "man's castle" was considered no one else's business. But we now know a great deal more about what happens behind closed doors, and progressive feminists such as Mills are trying to open America's mind to new ideas and innovative approaches.

According to Mills, studies now confirm that women initiate violence in 24 percent of cases in which the husbands don't fight back, while men initiate violence in 27 percent of cases in which women don't fight back. In the other 49 percent of cases, both partners actively participate in the violence.

What this tells us is that violent partners frequently have a relationship problem that is never addressed under our system of arrest-and-punish. Moreover, says Mills, a majority of families with violence issues don't want to shatter the family, as our criminal system often encourages. They just want the violence to stop.

Yet many states have a "must-arrest" policy if a call to police is made. Many also take a "primary aggressor" approach in determining who should be arrested. Even if the man calls the police, says Mills, he's often the one hauled off and charged, based on the assumption that he, the physically stronger, is more dangerous.

Consequently, the underlying problem of violence isn't addressed and people needing help won't call police for fear of the draconian measures likely to follow. In fact, according to Mills, 75 percent of women and 86 percent of men don't call the police when their partner is violent.

The solution to domestic violence, says Mills, begins with recognizing it as a cyclical, intergenerational family problem that usually begins in childhood. Mills provides some devastating statistics to highlight how early this cycle begins and how hard it is to break the trend once begun: 35 percent of parents hit their infants when they believe they're misbehaving; 94 percent of parents spank their 3- to 4-year-olds for the same reason.

Research shows that children raised by violence are more likely to become violent or be the victim of violence in their own adult relationships -- and so it goes from one generation to the next.

Allowing exceptions for the most violent abusers, Mills proposes a broad, systemic approach to domestic violence that includes counseling and at least the option of restorative, rather than punitive, justice. The current approach to "treatment" usually consists of sending men to classes on how to be less sexist.

Mills is testing an alternative program in Nogales, Ariz., that brings the whole family together to learn how the cycle of abuse works within families. Without blaming the victim, Mills insists that everyone has to take responsibility for his or her role in the dynamic that leads to violence.

It is brave of Mills to invite these challenges. But if we're really serious about reducing domestic violence, we have to recognize that demonizing men isn't the answer and that sexism isn't the only question.

It's at least time for a new conversation.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Ms. Kathleen Parker:
Excellent article! I give you a standing ovation!! I am so tired of seeing men ripped to pieces by our wonderful justice system all across America. Thank you for writing a wonderful article and speaking the truth.

God Bless You Dearly Kathleen!

Beverly Lanfear
Co-founder, TAJLR
http://www.tajlr.com

Oh, those poor wussy-boys
"One of the primary myths -- and the one that meets with the most resistance -- is that only men are violent. As I point out in my own book, "Save the Males," women and children indeed suffer the worst injuries and more often die as a result of those injuries. But women initiate violence as often as men."

Women are not as strong as men and definitelty are more at risk of being injured or even killed by these men. I read new sories constantly of domestic disputes that end up with a woman being shot or beaten to death(often in front of her children), by her husband, ex-husband, or ex-boyfriend. In many of these cases, he kills the children too. I have never read of a woman doing that to a man.

Honestly, does this woman really believe that a woman is physically capable of beating the crap out of a guy? A man can restrain a crazed woman without even hurting her.

Personally: I have only seen MEN
injured BY WOMEN. SEVERELY.

I have seen men arrested for "illegal restraint" because they admitted to 'grabbing her hand holding the knife.' She was not.

My neighbor was arrested even though the police officers SAW the woman attacking him with a pot or pan. Then, she picked up a knife and CUT HIM BADLY.

He had NEVER been in any trouble before. He OWNED the house. She had been in numerous fights with males and females and had a 'rap sheet' a mile long. She had been there for two days.

The police left her in HIS HOME after a fight... Guess what she did??? She BURNED IT TO THE GROUND!

I have seen other men so demeaned and degraded by their wives/girlfriends they could hardly function at work. The only thing that kept them employed was the knowledge that IF they LOST their jobs - SHE WOULD BE ANGRY.

I asked one woman who had been fighting 'with her man' (her words) WHY? And she said, "The make-up sex is great. And he brings me stuff the next day"

A Scientific Analysis
It makes sense that domestic violence against men is increasing. American men, especially white men, are evolving into women. They're becoming weaker and more fragile right before our eyes.

Nature gives species the ability to adapt to their environments by changing physically. The webbing of skin on our hands and feet are remnants of our amphibian ancestors who crawled out of the water and onto land.

There are all sorts of examples of creatures changing shapes and colors over a few generations to blend into their surroundings and not be exposed to predators.

Men are showing the results of a few decades of feminization. Masculinity has been legislated and litigated away. Modern culture's message is that female behavior is superior, male behavior is inferior and always wrong.

Little boys are drugged up in school for acting like little boys because school officials don't know how to cope with them or don't have the authority.

Modern culture's message is that women have the lead roles. TV drama shows have 25 year old women solving the crimes and rescuing the vulnerable. We see 25 year old heroes with 5 Phds, fluent in 30 languages, chasing down and overpowering squads of ex NFL lineman, then going home to console their "male" life partners who are crying because the meals they prepared for their wives have gotten cold and the kids aren't doing well in school.

Naturally American "men" respond to these environmental signals by morphing into women. Recent studies are showing a large percentage of boys growing breasts.

And look at GOP "men". Can anyone deny that they have female genitalia? Look at Scott McClellan. He's the epitome of the modern GOP male: fat, estrogen laced whinny mommy's "boy" who squeals like a pig.

Caligula, the name ...
says it all.

Well, now, I have a friend that was beaten by his wife in front of their small children, ages 8 and 10, and she encouraged them to help her. He had scratches, bruises and bite marks all over him. He is much bigger and stronger and could have torn her to shreads, but he didn't. She called the police to report him abusing her. While the police were in route, he was sitting in his car trying to make sense of all that just happened when she walked by the passenger side of the car and threw a ring of keys through the open window and hit him squarely on the nose. Blood gushed all over the place.

When the police arrived, they took a look at him, took a look at her, had a brief conversation with the kids, then promptly arrested her for domestic violence. I guess that makes the score:
Women: 10,000,000
Men: 1

Spineless Men and Women with Stones
Cicero makes a very good point in his last paragraph... My thought about McClellan exactly.

jolly good stuff
Here in the hinterlands of northwestern PA, domestic violence is big business. We are a town of about 15,000 but are blessed with 3 "safe places" (that I know of). Hardly a day goes by that smeone isn't "on the record" for domestic violence, usually at 2:30 a.m., soon after the bars close. There are numerous "professionals" whose only function is to educate the violent out of their predelictions. Your article points out that counselling is a widely recommended and used tactic.
My approach would go back to the schoolyard: peer pressure. Recently the local domestic violence gurus needed bigger (and better) offices. I recommended at the time that they lease a former (now empty) store front at the main intersection of town. They would mark the doors plainly: "Domestic Violence Violators Enter (Exit) Here." Large windows could be installed at street level so that anyone passing by could see who was receiving wisdom from one of the 24-year-old domestic experts. Like bigotry, we're never gonna completely get rid of this stuff. I am quite certain that deaf-mutes find ways to argue with each other, and that sometimes those arguments turn vioent.

Violet women
We all know that hillary clinton threw lamps, ash trays and temper tanttrums when ever bill got caught screwing around. My ex-wife got involved with a cop who knew that if I did anything physical I would be in trouble. She repeatedly said and did things to provoke me and thank God I didn't fall into that trap. I'd be willing to bet the majority of men in jail for "spouse abuse" were pushed into it by some nagging hag who knew what buttons to push then called 911 when her husband did somthing. No man should loose his house to a nagging witch who pushes him past his limit. All too often she then moves her new man into the husband's house while passing the bill to the poor slob she married.

I happen to have been in the position
of having been an 'abused husband'. Apparently, according to a gubmint official (female, of course), I don't actually exist, because a) women are never abusive, and b) even if a woman did do something it was reactive, i.e. the man started it. It is a worse experience than has been described here.

However, what really got me going was how this affects the kids. While I was not in great physical danger from her (unless she had tried to kill me in my sleep as she had threatened numerous times), the children were. My daughter, in particular, was subjected to random daily beatings up until the separation, not to mention incredibly nasty verbal and emotional abuse. The Children's Aid report called this 'inappropriate discipline'. Never, ever get them involved, especially if the offender is a woman, especially their mother. Another kid I knew of had bruises from neck to foot, I saw them, again from mom, Children's Aid reported it as a bike accident.

I guarantee you that a lot of the women who are nasty to their husbands are far worse to their kids, who, Caligula you shiite for brains, a woman is very much capable of beating up and beating on.

At least in my case, thanks to an excellent lawyer, a mountain of evidence, and a judge that actually considered the evidence, my story has a happy ending as the kids have been with me for over four years now.

Oh, and Caligula, and those
feminists that wrote VAWA and all those laws predicated on men being bad and that a woman is not phsyically capable of beating the crap out of a man, please square this circle.

If men are so physically dominant with respect to women, please explain how it is possible that when it comes to employment, in say the military, police force, firefighting, etc., gender is just a social construct and women should have the same opportunities as men?

Talk about wanting to have your cake and eat it, too.


Thank you Kathleen
Thank you Kathleen. I am glad a woman is telling this important story.


There are many women who feel entitled
to become physically violent with men and expect that he do nothing to protect himself. Many of my girls whack, kick, push, jump on, etc... guys in effort to flirt or attract attention. Sometimes out of reflex, the guy will push back or step out of the way of the oncoming lip-glossed bullet, then the drama begins. I recently worked with a teen couple who were comprised of a 5'1 girl and a 6'00 guy, and the girl felt perfectly entitled to hit him when she was frustrated because "she can't hurt him anyway". She fancied herself cute. But she did hurt him as evidenced by a set of stitches in his brow line, yet he was determined to stay with the girl.

When working with abusive dynamics, it is essential to use a family systems model. Good therapists have be doing it for years. If the violence isn't mutual, it is equally as important to look at what keeps the abused partner in the relationship, specifically what parts of them have shut down and have become desensitized to abuse. It all gets dealt with in family systems work, IF participants are willing and honest- otherwise, forget it.

I must admit its creepy to meet the ones who like hurting others and don't care to change. That does happen more often than many think.

Females unable to beat up men?
Seems like it never ends. Mention men being abused by women and a feminist will pop up shreaking about women are not violent and besides, they are weaker, smaller and less capable of violence than men. Then, out of the other side of their face, they shrill how women are just as capable as men and can perform the same as men as policemen and soldiers and firemen or any job that has been traditionally done by men. So I have never understood how they are supposed to be so weak on one hand but so strong and capable on the other?

Also, as to men being beat up on by women, studies have shown that first off, men, are far less likely to fight back, second, women are far more likely to use a weapon, third, women are also far more likely to strike when a man is helpless...as in asleep, or from behind or as in having someone else do the dirty deed.

Regardless, women can be and are just as violent as men. Their smaller weaker frames make them more likely to be hurt if the man defends himself, but men are raised to not hit women...and its drummed into them in schools nowadays that they cannot hit women...

Yet women are acting more and more like men. Being agressive....hitting men....are supposed to be as physically capable as men, just watch any movie..I had one women mention that women could do anything a man could do...and mentioned one famous movie....saying seeeeee....she did it. All I could do was shake my head in disbelief.,....as if a movie represented real life. But that seems to be a belief of some, maybe many women. It is shown in movies...so it must be real.

Spanking = violence???
Kathleen makes a point in passing that I must address. She makes an assumption--doesn't even argue the point--that all spanking is violence and "trains" children to be violent.

I believe there are many like me who would disagree. There is spanking that is indeed violence and a form of child abuse. There is spanking that is done responsibly, under control, with proper motivation and goals, that is NOT violence or child abuse, AND that does not train children to be violent. I come from generations of such child rearing!

Two Cents

Women are as likely to instigate violence in relationships as are men. That data has been available for many years. Women are also much more likely to use a weapon to even the odds.

I knew a guy whose girlfriend attacked him with a baseball bat. He took the bat away from her, but was arrested anyway. Because the law at the time required an arrest and it was policy to arrest the "larger" of the two combatants.

I also knew a woman who fully admitted that she knew exactly how to enrage her husband to the point he would hit her, which gave her almost complete control of the relationship.

There is no statistical basis for the current set of domestic violence laws and policies.








Caligula: No
"Honestly, does this woman really believe that a woman is physically capable of beating the crap out of a guy? A man can restrain a crazed woman without even hurting her."

No, they wait for the man to fall asleep, like Mary Winkler, when she shot her husband in the the back w/ a shotgun & let him slowly bleed to death. Mary Winkler then made up a story about being a Domestic Abuse victim that everyone believed because men are of course evil by nature. She receieved a 180-day sentence.

What Ms. Parker failed to mention is the fact that women are more likely to use a weapon than men, e.g., knife, gun, frying pan, scalding water, etc.

Spanking = Violence???
Being a responsible parent means teaching your child the just principles of right and wrong and the difference between good and evil. That doing what is right or good does not always bring rewards, but doing what is wrong or evil that punishment should be expected.

I too, come from generations of responsible parents that believed that “sparing the rod and spoiling the child” was a good principle to live by. I still remember some of the spankings and I deserved each one of them.


Legitimacy
Given contemporary society's state of "Institutionalized Misandry", it takes a MSM female pundit like Ms. Parker to grant this issue legitimacy.

Caligula: I have a dream
I have a dream that a society will end its pathological fear of holding women accountable for their actions. Contrary to the implicit sexism of the $20B “Violence Against Women Act”, you might be interested to know women are just as likely as men to engage in violence:

+Psychologist John Archer reviewed hundreds of studies and concluded, “Women were slightly more likely than men to use one or more act of physical aggression and to use such acts more frequently.” [Source: John Archer: Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 126, No. 5, pages 651-680]
+ Law professor Linda Kelly noted, "leading sociologists have repeatedly found that men and women commit violence at similar rates." [Source: Linda Kelly: Disabusing the definition of domestic abuse. Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 30, pages 791-855, 2003. Accessible at: http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/304/ke lly.pdf ]
+ An international survey of violence between dating partners in 16 countries concluded: “Perhaps the most important similarity is the high rate of assault perpetrated by both male and female students in all the countries.” [Source: Murray Straus: Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2001]

Not Spanking = Violence
I'm guessing that a large portion of the problems that society faces these days is because parents DIDN'T beat their kids enough in the 60s, 70s, and 80s (the 90s kids aren't old enough to do damage yet).

cyberpip1, a funny story about ...
the influence of movies:

Fresh after seeing the "Charlies Angels" movie, my teenage daughter was goofing around by kicking in my direction without the intent of actully hitting me. After about three or four such kicks, I reached out and grabbed her leg and held up forcing her to stand on just one leg. For some reason (Charlies Angels perhaps?), she decided she was going to leap and kick me with the one leg I wasn't holding. As you might guess, the laws of gravity took over and she splatted on the kitchen floor like a wet bag of flour.

Luckily, she wasn't hurt. That was a couple years ago and I still tease her about it. All in all, it turned out to be a great lesson about that which is real and that which is Hollywood make-believe.

Caliqula
No, most women can not physically beat down a man, but then, why do you assume they need to?

A friend of my has a nice knot on his back given to him by an ex-wife, who he could easily have beaten down in a fight. Perhaps that is why she hit im in the back by throwing a massive five pound glass ashtay when he ticked her off.

And as another person mentioned in here today, I do not care how weak the average 95 lb housewife is: if she has a 45 or even a baseball bat, she can do some significant damage.

Add to that the fact that many "abused men" will not hit back, having been raised to never strike a woman under any circumstances, and you see the problem.

Understand that I am not suggesting this is an epidemic or that we need more laws to protect abused men. I am simply saying that it happens more often than you might think, and should be taken seriously by law enforcement. If a guy gets cracked over the head with a tire iron by his wife, he should be able to have her locked up as fast as he himself would be were the tables turned.

Female aggressors
I was in a horribly abusive relationship for twenty years. I met other men in similar situations. During marriage I tried to "fix" the problem with counseling. What a joke! The fundamental assumption was ALWAYS that the husband was a failure leading to a wife's frustrations and anger. What a joke!

Men have a physical advantage in almost every instance. Women have the psychological advantage in almost every instance.

We all know men who are down right mean and abusive to women and men. We also know plenty of mean women who are mean, mean, mean.

My X said "get out of the house" ever couple of weeks for 20 years. One day I did.

Happily ever after.

We fight get over it...
Okay here are the two ways to approach this problem which makes sense?

Plan A: You realize we live in a messed up world and people are going to fight so you just allow 90% of it to be considered normal and you try to help the 10% most extreme cases.

Plan B: You have this view that everybody is supposed have peace and luv and to never fight and you endlessly get involved with 90% of the population trying to re-educate them into your Cultural Marxist expectation of equality of power cycle of violence lies, and irrational expectations that we should all just get along.

Thank you, Kathleen!
Thanks for pointing out this problem, which the legal system ignores or minimizes. My ex-sister-in-law perjured herself during her divorce trial, but the female judge could not believe that this thin woman had actually hit my brother. I wish someone would write about the number of times men are falsely accused of spousal and child abuse while in the process of divorce. In fact, my ex-sister-in-law also tried to use the civil domestic violence laws against me, and again perjured herself. Fortunately, the male judge I had did not believe her.

So what?
This is one of those "everyone knows" but act like they don't. It's unfair. But just like alimony, child support of other men's children, denial of visitation and a litany of anti-male legal inequities, there will be no change. Period. Facing these, men still ask women to marry... I have to conclude on the evidence we men are not too bright.

Thanks for the Article!
This is so true. I know a man whose ex-girlfriend initiated a LOT of violence, even once attacking him with a frying pan! She was a tiny little woman and he's 6'2 and strong, so he couldn't even defend himself for fear of getting caught up in a situation where it would look like he was the one abusing her. It took forever to finally get a judge to believe his side of the story. Thankfully, he's out of that relationship now.

Changing Times
This will all change when America has Islamic law. The girls better enjoy this while it lasts because things will change for sure. Those Muslim dudes are a whole different breed of cat and I think the concept of abused husbands will eventually become obsolete.

Elder and Sibling Abuse
Every combination of domestic abuse you can imagine actually happens. People cause serious injury to their frail and infirm parents or grandparents, children beat up their younger or older siblings, etc. The perversity of the human being is endless.

We fight get over it...
Think that might be why all the ancients had martial arts…

OMG!
There is actually hope for the human race yet!

This article is wonderful for two reasons:

1. A "progressive feminist" did a study and discovered, without regard to politics of any kind, that our DV policies were not helping, figured out a possible reason why - because it's more complicated (as most issues are) than just "man beating woman or child" or even "woman beating man or child" - and came up with a solution that just might address the problem and help us end the cycle of violence in so many families.

2. The conservative/libertarian author agreed with her and was able to do so with no bashing of the feminist movement (actually praising the movement for bringing this problem to the attention of the world).

I think Hell just froze over.

Seriously, folks, this is the kind of thinking I have talked about on this site and others - we have to put our political eyeglasses down and really look at problems with HUMAN eyes and that's when we find so many wonderful solutions to problems that EVERYBODY can agree on.

That's the kind of "change" I'm looking for in my politicians and in my society. That's real bipartisan ship. That's having a dialogue.

The problem is that these problems have been politicized by the Left and the Right and NOTHING HAS GOTTEN DONE because of it.

Really think about that for a minute.

Problems like DV, teen pregnancy, violence in general, whatever, are HUMAN PROBLEMS and need to be approached that way instead of trying to out-fox the other side with political saavy.

This is the kind of thing that Prager and Jeffrey just did regarding working moms. They demonize working moms, regardless of economic class, instead of really looking at the "problem" through human eyes, which would acknowledge that many women HAVE to work and others actually WANT to work because they find that, coupled with parenthood, fulfilling.

OMG, Part 2
SAHMs can be just as bad at parenting as working moms. No one has the corner on that. There is good and bad in everyone and the problems we have with youth stem from all kinds of things, including the "new parenting" (read: permissive), which I don't agree with.

There are SAHMs in my neighborhood and several of them, well, they make their own misery by not getting organized around the house and letting their children run too rampant.

I was home for about a year with my children and with my mom's help, I learned about organizing myself (and my kids were 3 and 4 at the time) and keeping them under a certain amount of control so that my day didn't wind up being out of control. Yeah, there were still good days and bad days (kids are only human after all), but all in all I learned a good lesson.

Maybe we're not teaching our youth that lesson anymore and I don't think that one needs to stay at home to do that. My mother only stayed home with me until I was 3 and then she had to go back to work, but I still learned something from her anyway.

In conclusion, let's use this article as an opportunity to reflect on how we handle what have become hot political issues.

We need to leave our political glasses at home and reflect on these things in a human way and we'll see how fast we can come up with wonderful solutions that satisfy everybody.

Cheers.

We fight get over it...
Thanks for reminding me of another reason the ancients had martial arts…

We fight get over it...
There is no cycle of violence when you defeat your rival…

ignoring half the equation
I once lived in an apartment next to a family. The wife was rather a contentious person. One night , they began an argument, which I could hear due to thin walls. The husband tried to do the sensible thing- leave before he lost his temper. She told him "if you leave, I'll take your kids and you will never see them again". So he stayed. The argument continued, and she said "whaddya gonna do, hit me? You're not man enough". After another hour of such baiting (and possibly physical violence on her part- I can't say for sure), as well as several more attempts by the man to leave, he hit her. The next day, she posted a "note to her friend" in letters large enough to read from the parking lot, which read "I cant go shopping with you, Jim beat me up." I'm not saying he should have done it- he shouldn't have. But clearly she was "asking for it"; so she could play the victim.
Fast forward a few years to medical school, where I was villified for even bringing this up.
This problem will never be solved if, due to feminism or political correctness or whatever, this dynamic is not considered; so Bravo! Kathleen.

Welcome to the liberal community!
As one of TH's resident liberals, I'd like to welcome Mr. Parker to our ranks. This is a very thoughtful column about domestic violence that tries to get us to rethink what actually happens in families and why. A real conservative would have no use for all that therapeutic stuff, so that's why I know Ms. Parker is not a conservative. Real conservatives believe in arresting and punishing people.

Ms. Parker is even willing to challenge a fundamental conservative belief: that hitting kids is an appropriate way to discipline them. This takes real courage, and I applaud her for being willing to think out of the right-wing box.

We fight get over it...
"My eyebrows ain’t plucked.
There’s a gun in my truck.
Thank God I’m still a guy."

Brad Paisley - I’m still a guy

Rednecks have a much more realistic attitude about life...

We fight get over it...
My wife is the wildest critter to come out of the Sahara…

She left me every month for almost ten years…

We fight every day and there is nobody I’d rather fight…

Life would be incredibly boring if she stopped fighting…

THE POLITICS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1
The feminist-driven “domestic violence industry” is part of an ever-expanding, tax-funded “bureaucracy of compassion” with its attendant caregivers, social workers, regulators, intellectuals and social scientists. Its use of the term “domestic violence” rather than the more gender-neutral “relationship violence” is based on the Marxist analysis of gender relations penned by Marx’s collaborator Friedrich Engels which presupposes a male 'oppressor' ("Within the family, man is the bourgeoisie, woman and children the proletariat") and a female ‘victim.’

Feminists with a strong emotional investment in the presumption of an oppressive patriarchy base their assessment of men as “the violent sex” on police, court, hospital and refuge data while waving away numerous academic studies implicating both sexes equally in relationship violence. These seriously troubled sisters will cite police blotter statistics and other official data to falsely conclude that relationship violence is a male problem ("That’s just part of how 'they' treat 'us' as women").

There are a number of compelling reasons why a man might be reluctant to complain to authorities that his wife assaulted him. These include fear of ridicule or being disbelieved; threats that if police are called his wife will level a counter-accusation and he'll be the one arrested by an establishment predisposed to take her part; a reluctance to walk out of the home that he probably paid for; the likelihood that access to his children will be denied by a gender-biased Family Court should he leave to escape the violence; and fears for the children's physical safety if he's no longer around to protect them from a violent mother.

THE POLITICS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 2
One of the saddest accounts of male victimisation by a violent female was that of an army drill sergeant in the United States, who placed his gun in his mouth at the dinner table and blew his brains out in front of his family, after the contrast between his macho parade ground persona and the reality of his miserable existence became too much to bear.

The USA has a network of Women’s Refuges but not a single Man’s Refuge. And if a man did show up at a Women’s Refuge seeking relief from a violent female partner, do you think he’d be admitted? Like police blotter statistics, “refuge data” clearly have significant limitations in terms of providing an accurate picture of relationship violence in our community.

Dr Martin Fiebert has examined 155 scholarly investigations, 126 empirical studies and 29 reviews and/or analyses in concluding that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 116,000 and can safely be regarded as statistically robust. Fiebert’s annotated bibliography, first published in Sexuality and Culture Volume 8, Number 3-4, Summer-Fall 2004, can be viewed online at http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm.

Contrary to the demonstrably false feminist picture of relationship violence, men and women are implicated in relationship violence in approximately equal numbers at all levels of severity as assessed by a standardised "Conflict Tactics Scale.” Both sexes are more or less equally represented in every category from throwing a teaspoon all the way up to murder. In some categories (e.g. punched, kicked, hit or slapped one's partner), female involvement slightly outstripped that of males.

THE POLITICS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 3
Approximately one third of violent incidents were found to be "he assaults her," one third "she assaults him," and one third "they assault each other.” Most of what is categorised as "relationship violence" was found to be occasional, low level, and didn't result in serious injury, i.e. shoving, pulling, slapping, throwing small objects etc.

The most violent individuals, whether male or female, represent a tiny minority of those studied. Severely violent men typically used their fists and feet on spouses or partners. Severely violent women characteristically used weapons to even up the size difference or attacked spouses or partners when they were asleep or otherwise off-guard.

British family care activist, Erin Pizzey, who set up the first Women's Refuge in England in 1971, had a well-publicised falling out with the Sisterhood after she wrote a book claiming that many women presenting at her Chiswick Women's Refuge were "at least as violent as the men they had left behind" and self-admittedly addicted to the adrenalin rush they got from provoking violent reactions in their male partners, though few enjoyed the violence itself. These women were repeatedly and often seriously verbally and physically violent both to their own children and to other women in the shelter.

The foregoing analysis demonstrates conclusively that relationship violence is in fact a human problem, not a gender issue as the feminist movement would have us believe. It is long overdue for women as a group to acknowledge the female contribution to such violence rather than simply blaming males for something women are, on all the evidence, equally involved in.

Women's Victim Card: Joker
RADAR Media Fact Sheet

- Women are just as likely as men to engage in partner aggression

- Men experience over one-third of DV-related injuries

- Men are far less likely to report DV incidents than women

- The myths about domestic violence are numerous: "woman is beaten every 15 seconds", "4,000 women each year are killed by their husbands, ex-husbands, or boyfriends"

- Many of myths are based on DV studies that use biased survey methods

http://www.mediaradar.org

America media (and other liberal organizations) loves "man bad, woman victim" stories, however, there are greater number of men as victim of violent crime compared to women.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/vsx2.htm

In practice, the woman calls 911 for domestic violence (she felt afraid) to get the Family Court's Restraining Order (Order of Protection) to later have the husband/father removed from the home. This separates the man from his children and property. Since, in Family law, possession is 9/10ths of the law, the woman gets the kids, home, stuff, and 18 years of tax-free income.

Domestic violence my eye.

Responsibility
FLASHBACK: Mary Winkler shot husband in back and kills him. Government judge sentences Mary to about forty-five days in a mental health clinic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Winkler

CONTRAST: About the same time, Michael Vick kills a few dogs. Government judge sentences Mike to about two years in jail.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Vick

VAWA
Feminism may deserve credit for putting domestic violence on the radar back but what was their motive? I contend that all one need do to find that motive is to "follow the money” We also need to actually see what the Violence Against Women Act actually says and how it came about.

When it was written and each time it was renewed, only gender feminist were allowed to give input. This would be like writing racial relationship policies and only having the KKK there and not inviting the NAACP.

we need to find out the source of any "stats" we use and to see if someone has something to gain from those stats. This being said, the most reliable stats are from unbiased sources or those who have nothing to gain by what they show. Here are a few of them:

SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 219 scholarly investigations: 170 empirical studies and 49 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 221,300.

http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.h...


Men Shouldn't Be Overlooked as Victims of Partner Violence

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). and the lead investigator was Daniel Whitaker, Ph.D., a behavioral scientist and team leader at the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (which is part of the CDC) it is a bit higher then that:

Regarding perpetration of violence, more women than men (25 percent versus 11 percent) were responsible. In fact, 71 percent of the instigators in nonreciprocal partner violence were women. This finding surprised Whitaker and his colleagues, they admitted in their study report

http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/conte...

Did you get that? "71 percent of the instigators in nonreciprocal partner violence were women. "

VAWA part two
As for help, women have well over 2,000 shelters they can go to while men have perhaps 4 or 5 now. Women have the Violence Against Women Act that allows a lot of perks for being a victim and it encourages the false accusation of abuse in order to gain leverage in a divorce. Presently, one out of five divorces involve the false accusation of abuse. This will assure the accuser will get the house and a hefty child support award and that the accused will likely never see his children again, all with little or no burden of proof.

Why is it important to know the truth about domestic violence? If we do not look at both sides and address both sides, we will not only fail to resolve the problem, but we will make it worse. There is seldom a conflict between two adults where both do not add to the problem but the VAWA prohibits doing anything but accepting a woman's allegation of abuse as gospel. It does not matter if she was beating him to a pulp for no reason, if he hits her back, then he is at fault.

As the founder of Shattered Men, we have been helping both men and women since 1999 and many marriages have been saved because we feel the real solution is found here:

http://shatterdmen.com/first_step.htm

The Violence Against Women Act and CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES

http://www.shatterdmen.com/VAWA%20too.htm

Why we do not know the Truth
http://www.shatterdmen.com/pagetwo.htm

Pastor Kenneth Deemer

Director Shattered Men
P.O. BOX 166
MARION INDIANA 46952-0166

shatteredmen@earthlink.net

JUNE is Domestic Violence Against Men Awareness Month

Thank God!!
Thank God myths about DV are starting to be shattered in the (somewhat) mainstream media!

A lot of us here know men who've been victims of DV but have been unjustly arrested themselves. Now is the time to stare down the propaganda machine and show it for what it is!

Many people don't know the common characteristics of male and female violence in relationships. One of them is that male violence is often spontaneous (i.e. he gets pissed and hauls one off), while female violence is often planned in advance (i.e. she searched the house for a wrench before he gets home, then hides behind the bathroom door). Of course, with the prominence of the soon to be deceased Duluth Model, women's violence has never been examined. That is, until now.

BTW - I'm very surprised that the Senior vice provost at New York University had the guts to write about this. NYU is a real liberal hotbed.
Big kudos go out to Linda Mills, and Kathleen parker for writing this article!

D.V.
I am glad to see this subject coming to light. I just sent my two year old daughter home with a woman who has a documented legal history of assault and D.V. which extends from her early teens until the current.
I left the relationship thinking justice would prevail and with the idea "everything comes out in the wash". We both went though scores of evaluations including a court ordered "Risk Assessment". The conclusions of that were "the mother presents a significant risk to the physical safety and mental well being of the children in her care". It took me 5 1/2 months to clear my name and see my baby for the first time after being accused of D.V. (Despite the fact the mother being arrested and charged with the incident in question). In family law if your a man there is very little justice... it's just us.

Marrige and Divorce
Domestic violence law is used to create more jobs for feminists in government and empower women.

Just before my wife divorced me she hit my in the face. Being a guy I ignored it.

Later, she FELT afraid of me. She dialed 911 and the cops threw me in jail.

When she filed for divorce (and 75% of American woman initiate divorce) she told the judge she felt afraid and cited the DV charge. The judge without due process separated me from me children, 18 years of income, possessions and home.

Further, it took me two years, three court visits, and about $1,000 to have the false battery charge removed from my public record, however, during this time it was diffcult to secure a job offer with the charge on my public records.

Girl power has gone too far.

A great book that gives an accurate picture of the divorce industry is Dr. Baskerville's "Taken into Custody: The War Against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family"

http://www.amazon.com/Taken-into-Custody-Fatherhood-Marriag e/dp/1581825943

RADAR organization publishes truthful statistics on domestic violence.

http://www.mediaradar.org

Today, a guy is a fool to live with or marry a woman.

Been there, seen that, not going back
I was attacked by my ex-wife with a knife. I threatened to call the police, then left to another part of the house. I didn't call the police because I just could not do that to her. But, she decided to beat me to the punch and called the police and accused me of pushing her. I went to jail for 2 nights. She found some self-respect and argued with the DV fanatical DA until she got me out. I began researching and found out about VAWA, divorce courts, the incredible influence of gender feminists with gender political axes to grind, etc. That was enough for me. I got divorced - paid my several pounds of flesh - and I will never get married again. Nor will I live with a woman. Makes me sad, because I always wanted kids, but in the current environment, it just does not make sense. I hope future generations of men find a different environment in which it does make sense again to get married and fathers are appreciated.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.