Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, September 22, 2006
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Axis of Oil and Nuts
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


George Bush owes Hugo Chavez a thank-you note. The Venezuelan president's goofy performance at the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday made Bush look like Winston Churchill.

Waving a Noam Chomsky book about America's quest for global dominance, Chavez railed against Bush:

``Yesterday the devil came here,'' he said, referring to Bush's address to the U.N. ``Right here. Right here. And it smells of sulfur still today, this table that I am now standing in front of.''

Then he made the sign of the cross, looked heavenward and put his hands together as if to pray. I think we can fairly conclude that the weird have officially gone pro.

Chavez would be a hoot if he weren't so dangerous. As the leader of America's fourth-largest foreign oil supplier, he has undeserved power, both in the world and over the U.S. When he's feeling grumpy, he threatens to cut us off. Wouldn't we love not to have to entertain his mood shifts?

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said she wouldn't dignify Chavez's remarks with a response, while Margaret Beckett, the British foreign secretary, said: ``It's hard to see it (Chavez's rant) as helpful."

But it was helpful, if only to allow the rest of the world -- and especially napping Americans -- to see what we have before us. Chavez is not alone in the assorted nut bowl. One of his pals is Bolivian President Evo Morales, who came to the U.N. waving a coca leaf, saying: ``Does this look like a drug to you?''

Both are buddies of Cuban leader Fidel Castro, who recently hosted the 118 nations of the Nonaligned Movement -- a gathering of anti-yanquis, including Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, that should have sent chills down American spines.

How many dots do we need before we notice the gathering storm?

Ahmadinejad, who has promised to wipe Israel off the map, complained to the group that the world shouldn't have to live under the nuclear threat of the U.S. Better, presumably, that the world should live under the nuclear threat of Iran?

In an accord that sparks cognitive dissonance among the sane, the nonaligned nations agreed. Their final declaration supported Ahmadinejad's position while urging that Tehran cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Feeling safer yet?

Even a stopped watch is right twice a day, and Chavez was right about one thing. He said U.S. consumerism was ``madness'' and that Americans are wasteful with oil and energy. Consuming less, he said, should be an environmental policy.

Correcto. Conservation also should be part of our foreign policy. Thugs like Chavez have power because of only one thing -- oil. Logically, our best weapon against our enemies is to neutralize them by eliminating our dependence on their oil. Not soon-ish, but now.

Even Bush, whose power base back in Texas is dripping in black gold, has said we need to wean ourselves from oil, but he has stopped short of making that goal a national mandate. He hasn't asked Americans to sacrifice or goaded industry to immediate action.

The war on terror has required much of men and women on the ground, but little of the rest of us, who continue to gorge and guzzle. I plead guilty, but have begun doing what little I can -- not because I'm virtuous, but because I don't want Chavez to have a seat on the U.N. Security Council.

Recently, we traded an SUV for a hybrid (Toyota Prius) that gets up to 60 miles per gallon. Many other automakers are creating hybrids, but they need to be cheaper and the incentives to buy greater.

Meanwhile, there are dozens of ways to conserve individually, which, though seemingly small, have a cumulative effect. For a quick primer on how to reduce oil dependence, pick up Laurie David's new booklet: ``The Solution is You!'' David is a global warming activist but her book could be a guide to thwarting terrorism. So the planet benefits, too. What a deal.

Through leadership, incentives and legislation, we could begin to sketch a new road map to peace. It might cost us a little upfront. It might even inconvenience us a bit. But in return, we get to ignore the bleatings of third-world despots, while defusing the power of jihad.

We can say the devil made us do it.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Our energy dependence
is our biggest liability. "Going green" isn't hippy monbat nonsense now...it's a national security matter. I would love to stop funding Chavez and the Islamo-fascists...because I know I'm doing it every time I fill up!

How about a nuclear mideast?
I have a long term solution to the problem. Convince the nations of the Middle East that they need to find a new source of power, nuclear power. After a few years of constructing more and more efficient nuclear plants, the price of energy will plummet. Nuclear power is the solution.

As for environmentalism: you are insane if you believe that environmentalism is ideologically neutral. The main pillar of environmentalism is an animistic "religion" which humanizes the earth and denies scarcity. Environmentalism is dangerous because it is based on a false premise, that human knowledge can encompass and control natural processes. Environmentalism will do for the environment what liberalism has for constitutional government and the rule of law; that is, destroy it.

Rogue
Hmmmm.

OK, well said. Maybe a little harsh, but the right track.

Surrender is not the option
Why is it that as soon as we're confronted with a Monty Python type moonbat jeering at us from behind his mother's skirts, the first instinct of so many people is that we go "back to the land" and give up our way of life?

What about DEFYING the greenies and starting our own drilling program for our own oil in our own country, meanwhile building more refineries and repealing the laws requiring different blends of gasoline in each state -- as if people confined themselves to one state or emptied their tanks at the border?

Once I asked a prominent rally driver what it would take to get a World Rally round in the USA. His response was succinct and to the point: "Jail the Environmentalists."

That is my answer too: the first step to getting rid of our "need" to deal with Chavez et al. is to jail the Greenies and put our own American Know-How to work again. Bring back Good Old American Knowhow, and kick the hippies' backsides. There's your answer -- not going back to living in huts and digging in the ground with a stick. (The current spinach-is-death scare ought to let you know what a world without technology would be like.)

Chomski is a total hypocrite
Just read 'Do As I Say' and you'll find that Chomski is in it for the money and nothing else. Just like all neo-lib hypocrites. They get wealth and power by conning the ignorant fools of the world.

AudiR10
Maybe you missed that particuler news flash, but oil is a finite (and dwindling) resource. Geologists have calculated that peak global production has already been reached and we are starting on the down-slope of oil availability. Discoveries of new deep-water oil fields such as the one in the Gulf of Mexico will still happen from time to time, but they will not keep pace with the exploitation of exsisting oil fields. Market demand will keep oil prices rising as extraction becomes increasingly problematic. When I first started as a Geology major in college, I was told there is no future in Petroleum Geology. The future for geologists is ground water quality and related "green" issues. Sorry if that doesn't mesh with your rosy view of oil supplies.

Celt
I agree with you on the finite nature of oil.
I personally don't think bio fuels are the answer though. The weather is much more capricious than nut jobs from other countries.
There is a compressed air vehicle coming out of Australia next year. The hybrid model can go something like 1200 miles on a tank of gas.
It will sell for around 17K.
The oil days are numbered. Then the middle east and Venezuela can go back to goat herding.

Get a Prius
call on all to conform.

Sounds a bit like South Park to me.

If I can ever afford it: I would buy a prius and put an SUV shell on it. When the greenies attack, I can show them my batteries!

Sorry, but I just cannot help this:
Celt did you ever consider that you were told that because OIL is a good ole boys club? And if you're not born in it, they didn't want you? (I am assuming that you DON'T come from oil money here.)

On a more serious note: I fear the greenies MUCH more than the thought of running out of oil. Greenies will KILL for what you MIGHT be doing.

When I see all those amber waves of grain, and combine that with American ingenuity - I don't worry about running out of anything.


oil nukes hydrogen
So, why does "the energy solution" need to be all-or-none? Why not drill in the Gulf? (Even if we don't, the Chinese will at Cuba's behest, and I doubt their environmental controls are the world's strictest.) At the same time, move ahead on nuclear power (like most of Europe has), and make a national priority, with financial incentives, to have cars burn hydorgen by a date certain. I cannot believe that the big-but-shrinking three and Exxon-Mobil could not be enticed, especially if the quest is wrapped in the flag, which it clearly should be. If the greenies want ethanol, wind, solar, etc., great! We can do those too, realizing that none of them will be major contributors anytime soon. But every little bit helps.

Bottom line: We cannot continue to be dependent for our way of life on folks with values so different from our own.

p.s. I agree with Chavez on one thing: the UN should be moved to Venezuela.

Its all about the oil
Focus on the oil. While we waste our energies, money, and lives in the middle east, our economic hold over the rest if the world is going away. Look over your shoulder and you find 1.2 billion people in a communist country who is in an economic boom. They have nukes galore, our technology, our investment, no problem with islamists, and a total hold on our economy.

What they need is oil. Lots of it. Iran's got oil, Venezuelas got oil, Canada's got oil and they will buy from anyone. Oh, and they don't like us or our political system much at all. Do you really think they are buying our debt as an investment? No, it is a giant lever. Why are we allowing this to happen?

NRALifer
Good points, but none of them contradict the very real problem that oil is finite, and most of it is owned by the wrong people. ANWR should be drilled, but it will only keep pace with fields that are running out in Texas and Oklahoma for a few years. New technologies come on line to get oil from fields thought to be played out, but we are still facing the fact that actual worldwide production peaked in the nineties, and is begining to fall. ANWR, Utah, the Florida coast and the Gulf of Mexico will help us for some time, but worldwide production will contiue to drop.

modernone
I suspect part of the reason this has been allowed to happen, was Clinton's Clueless dealing with China, North Korea and Iran.

Clinton and China
I don't know what Clinton has to do with our economic dependance on China. He probably did the same dance on the corporate side to encourage trade and pass along our technology. He did not make us dependant on the Chinese to finance our government. Under Clinton we had relatively low need for someone to finance our debt. In the last 5 years we have borrowed a trillion dollars from China to feed government spending.

If China unleashes our treasuries they have acquired in the last 5 years on the open market, we will crumble given our continued demand for debt service for government, business and consumers. China says they will not do that because they need the dollar strong and our chief casino manage, Paulson, says they will cooporate. We may still have some leverage with the Chinese, why aren't we applying some pressure to get help with Iran and North Korea?

China will not need us much longer. Do your really trust the Chinese leaders who say someday we will make good house boys?

to celtic dragon
We are running out of oil. I've been hearing that all my life. We were supposed to be completely out in the 90's, that's what we were told in the early 80's. I remember because I had friends who were afraid they would never get to drive a car. But oil production is higher than it's ever been. Brazil recently stoppped importing and will begin exporting. The world could produce more right now except countries that nationalize their oil aren't very good at running oil companies. Exxon is a small player really. My information comes from Yahoo news, experience and The Economist.

I've used solar panels, I've studied alternative energy because I had to use it. It's not much of an alternative, it's a drop in the bucket. Alternatives to oil are great, hope we hit upon an idea that works. Until then drill and build nuclear power plants.

Let's all conserve.
Here are some ways we can all conserve.

The next time you are driving during the summer, roll you windows down and turn off your air conditioner. In fact, automobile air conditioners should be outlawed. Ride your bike or walk to work. Imagine the ambiance of an office where most people walked to work in hot, humid weather.

Get rid of your comfortable house in the suburbs and move into a cramped highrise in town. You can park your car and either walk or take public transportation.

Turn off the air conditioning in your offices and homes. Think of all the energy you can conserve and all the polution that will be eliminated.

If you are an average middle class wage earner and can't afford to fly the family to a nice vacation place be sure to drive there in a fuel efficient car. Imagine the togetherness of traveling in an econobox with almost no trunk space. The wife and kiddos will love it. And to conserve even more remember to keep that air turned off and the windows down.

Those of you in the north aren't turning your thermostats down enough in the winter. Dig out the long johns and sweaters. As long as your birds water doesn't freeze it's not too cold in the house.

Conservation is good but will only go a little way.

Eventually someone will develop an affordable alternative energy source. Those who complain about one not being developed yet obviously know little about economics. If Chev could develop a Suburban or Tahoe that would get 30 miles per gallon without sacrificing performance or safety and sell it at it's current price don't you think they would? They could corner the market on SUV sales.

to celtic dragon
The following is from RF Cafe, an engineering website:

"Predictions of oil supplies drying up within a few years have been common over the last 150 years, despite estimates of the total amount of oil resources still in the ground continually growing throughout the 20th century. In 1920, the U.S. Geological Survey announced that the world's total store of oil amounted to 60B barrels. In 1950, the world's total oil endowment was estimated at around 600B barrels. From 1970 through 1990, the estimates increased to between 1,500B and 2,000B barrels. In 1994, the U.S. Geological Survey raised the estimate to 2,400B barrels, and the 2000 estimate was of a 3,000B-barrel endowment. This is possible because the world's oil endowment is much larger than its oil reserves, which are identified resources that can be economically extracted and refined using current technology. As new technologies increase the amount of recoverable oil, and market prices encourage new exploration and development, the world's total endowment goes up. That does not even include unconventional oil resources like oil shales, for example, which could easily be as large as 14,000B barrels. More than 500 years of oil supply are now known to exist at 2000 production rates, and does not include other fossil fuels, such as natural gas and coal."

We are not running out of energy. Anyone who has taken physics knows that energy is conserved. There is enough free energy available on Earth today to take care of the world's energy needs for the next several thousand years. All we need to do is tap into it. The sky is not falling. Economics will dictate when we transform from an oil-based economy to some other energy source.

Finally
Someone else is saying that Chavez is a threat! Thank you Kathleen, I thought I was alone in the wilderness on this one! But you're a bit of a late comer...I covered him on my blog months ago in my post "Fox in the Henhouse".

And while I realize that oil is finite, until we can come up with something that really works better, we are stuck using petrol. Maybe one day someone can come up with an alternative energy source that is affordable and efficient...until then all the talk about alternatives is just that..TALK! We need to deal with things as they are, not how we wish them to be.

Something for everyone.
1 - Celtic Dragon - "Going green" isn't hippy monbat nonsense now...it's a national security matter.”
Question: When did this magical transformation occur? Environmentalists were wrong about oil on the first Earth Day three decades ago, but now they’re right? That makes no sense: the facts haven’t changed. If the “greenies” are right now, then they were right all along.

2 – Rogue Historian – Environmentalism “denies scarcity”? Care to back that statement up with some facts?

3 – BIGbelly – “Fat latin cheeks”? My how attractive! Why stop there? I’m sure you’ve also noticed that Jews have big noses, Orientals have squinty eyes, and African-Americans have big lips! What an ornament to conservatism you are!

4 – AudiR10 – Let me be sure I have this straight. You advocate jailing environmentalists because you don’t agree with their opinions? There are lots of terms to describe that kind of ideology, but democracy isn’t one of them!
Your recommendation for environmental concerns – ignore them - is very astute. The Soviets did that for many decades and look how well it worked for them!

5 – Porcupine – Shame on Chomski! If only he were more like Anne Coulter. A true idealist, she doesn’t make a dime from her books and speaking engagements, right?

6 – Celtic Dragon – Here’s a news flash for you: early predictions of oil shortages were premature, due primarily to new technologies for oil discovery and extraction. Therefore the idea that oil is a finite resource has been permanently refuted. Just read the next post by NRALifer and the later one from Pinto Man! Oil is being created right under our feet at this very minute! As for the oil geologists who “yammer” about “peak oil” and such nonsense, what do they know?

7 – Well, now – Well now, how about some examples of “Greenies” killing people? Be sure to include enough to justify your generalization.

8 – ct-tom – Great points! So why isn’t any of this part of our national policy? By the way, after ignoring environmental concerns, especially during Mao’s domination, China is finally beginning to address a number of critical issues. For an overview, you might check http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/chinaenv.html

9 – Otter – Thank you! Thank you! I was holding my breath, waiting for someone to blame environmental problems on Clinton, and sure enough, you came through. By the way, did you know that five or ten billion years from now, the sun will deplete its supply of hydrogen, swell into a red giant, and destroy the earth. And – you guessed it – Clinton’s responsible for that too!

10 – Kraut – “If Chev could develop a Suburban or Tahoe that would get 30 miles per gallon without sacrificing performance or safety and sell it at it's current price don't you think they would?” Actually, no! The major U.S. automobile manufacturers have faced the same choices that the Japanese have for decades and almost without exception have chosen poorly, usually in favor of short term profits. That’s a major reason they’re getting crushed in the marketplace today. This year U.S. companies will bring only a few percent as many hybrids to market as the Japanese. Why?

11 – DaveBe – You’re right about the energy, but “all we need to do is tap into it” skates over an immense technological gap. The devil is in those details!

TIME TO REGROUP
This little dog and pony show has put a fire under every body's back side (if it didn't you are living in the wrong part of the world) just as the events of 9/11 did, but as we all remember the flame died down significantly as time went by. The events of this week by the diaper head brigade who were chanting kill the pope, and the other two dirt bags who insulted our President and our country better be enough to wake up even the dead and the dummycrats. We need to start drilling everywhere and building new refineries regardless of what anyone says. Even though it is disputable as to the amount of oil that this earth has that has yet been tapped, standing around and disputing the issue has solved absolutely nothing and has put this nation ALMOST at the mercy of thugs who are dictators in countries not much bigger than some of our states. We either start working to take back this country by utilizing good old American know how, stop the flow of foreign aide, secure our borders, reverse the huge trade deficit, ship our jobs back to the states and just plain get our act together, or else their will be a day in the not so far future that the United States influence on the world will be reduced to junk status. DRILL EVERYWHERE! and continue to find an alternative fuel source or else. Visit http://www.headsneedtoroll.org and post your views, thoughts and opinions.
Heads Need To Roll

ajhil
My I have never heard of such a list of sterotypes... the lib must have been clawing for the opprtunity to get them in print then blaming ... and use his own rantings on conservatives...... I think ajhil should reassess his narrow minded sterotypes as well.

ajhil
The reason U.S. auto manufactureres don't have as many hybrids as the Japanese is that there is no market for them. Also, as a percentage of vehicles sold the Japanese hybrids aren't doing so good either. Hybrids have been around for a few years and I still don't see many of them on the road. Also missing are large numbers of electric cars.

Car sales are driven by the market choices, not social engineers or tree huggers. If buyers wanted hybrids there would be many more of them on the road.

If it makes you feel good to drive one then by all means do it. Just don't feel smug or superior. And remember to keep the air off.

ajhil
I'm working on it...

burn clean
My only issue with clean fuel alternatives is that the cost is put on the consumer. I can't afford to be forced to change my vehicle from an oil burning, gas using standard to anything that burns cleaner. Unfortunately, when people advocate "green" they don't care of the cost to everyone. If the government paid to replace all our vehicles, then fine. but people like me aren't going to be able to afford it any other way. And before you think of "car payments", not all of us Americans are thrilled with debt...I'm tring to become debt-free, not add on another bill I can't afford.

Pinto man, DaveB, etc
I can't vouch for what some engineering site said about supply, or figures that include oil shale and tar sands. If you don't like what geologists say, then by all means...go find a dowsing rod or read some tea leaves to find your oil. Good luck on that.

NRALifer
Oil is a fossil fuel, which means it is the liquified remains of living organisms from the past. If old wells are starting to "play" again, then I would 'speculate' that smaller oil deposits in adjaicent permeable sediments are migrating under pressure into the newly available space. Oil companies are helping this process along by pressurizing oil wells, as well as using new extraction technologies I'm sure that I haven't heard of to get every last drop out. It doesn't mean that oil is infinite. It means that we are getting much better at getting to it. At some point, possibly in our lifetime, the cost of getting to that oil will be more then the cost of other energy source technologies, and the free market will dictate what we will be driving.

raidencraig, ajhil
Good observations from both of you.

I Knew Winston, I was a friend of....
OK, I did not know Winston, but Bush's only similarity with the great Prime Minister is his
stubbornness. Problem is that Bush's IQ would not even qualify him to be the Prime Minister's bottler.

How Bush got to be the president of the United States, and be re-elected will forever be a case-in-study by Historians on mass dementia by voters.

But yes, Mr. Chavez makes Bush look good and that is no small accomplishment. I believe Bush should invite Chavez to the USA more often. After a few visits by that nut , even I will be looking at Bush from a new perspective.

I bet Rove is looking into the posibility of bringing Chavez for the Mid-Term elections. I can just see the political add....... You see this man?, and they put Chavez with a Machete
madly swinging it left and right.... Our President is trying to stop man like him from crossing the Rio Grand, that is why you most support Republicans for Congress. Democrats will only cut and run at the Machete people. Millions of them!!! All with Machetes and a bad attitude be afraid be very, very afraid!!! Vote Republican we'll keep you safe!! And Bush smiles at the end of the add while American flags (Thousands of them all around him) fly gently in a bright sunny day with a beautiful blue sky.

The reality?

Republicans WILL find Bin-Laden, WILL win the war against terrorism, WILL bring back the troops some day, WILL live Iraq a Democracy, WILL stop runaway spending in Government, WILL balance the budget, WILL do something about illegal immigration, WILL police their own corrupt politicians , WILL, WILL.... AH!! the future; Always the best friend of politicians that have not accomplished a thing, but want to be re-elected.

Cheap oil is like a free lunch:
They both end up costing a lot more than you thought.

Back in the '70s, OPEC relented when it became clear that conservation was cutting into demand. Today gas prices are going down just as alternative fuels and more efficient cars are starting to get a toehold. Coincidence? I don't think so. OPEC is betting that we will give up on those things just like we did 30 years ago.

Conservatism should be about self-reliance and independence -- even when that means sacrifice -- and not about having the "right" to indulge in an orgy of consumption.

It ought to be clear by now that we fund our enemies through our oil habit. Conservation is essential for winning the war.

Ethenol
Some smuck is trying to start an ethanol refinery in my neighborhood. Did you all know that it would use almost 800 gallons of water a minute? 800 gallons A MINUTE, people! We all have water wells out here in the boonies, and I don't think the ground water, even here in the Ozark mountains, can sustain that level of usage. And anyway, ethanol production is just a red herring. We need something like hydrogen. If every empty square inch in the USA was planted for ethanol production, it still wouldn't be enough.

hydrogen and hindenberg and things
for a start i have a bs in mechanical engineering. yes hydrogen is very flammable, and to get enough range out of a car powered by it you have to have a lot of gas, that is high volume or high pressure. if you go the high volume approach you have a bag the size of the car, not very good for high speed. high pressure means you have a heavy gage steel tank that can be designed to take a high speed car crash.
the main problem with the hindenberg was not the hydrogen it was the coating on the out side i forget what it was for but it was made out of powdered aluminum and iron oxide( a crude form of thermite) witch burns very hot and doesn't take much to set it off.
something to remember hydrogen is not a primary source of energy it is a storage medium like a battery there are no hydrogen mines or wells we have to make it. and as with all things we don't get 100% return and it costs, so where do we get the energy to make hydrogen?
as for ethanol if we switch get ready for $6.00 a gallon. the way they make it is by fermentation which produces a 20% solution, to get that out of the water takes energy, then you have to take into the price the cost of growing , and shipping the bulk crops.

Hydrogen has another problem
It is hard to contain for any lenght of time. The hydrogem molecule is so small, it passes through most metals - not quickly, but you do lose hydrogen through the walls. Because of this it also makes steel brittle - which is not a good thing when you are involved in an automobile accident.

H-cars what about water vapor emissions?
We're told how environmentally benign a hydrogen-powered car would be, but if millions of cars are pumping water vapor out their tailpipes, wouldn't that cause --- at least in urban areas --- oppressively high humidity in the summertime? Washington's bad enough in July, but what if the cares were to add 10% to the humidity, or to reach a saturation point? I'm no scientist, so I'm just askin' is all..........

hydrogen and water vapor
you are right hydrogen is hard to contain. if you tried to throw a 10 lb bowling ball through a tennis net i doubt you could but 10 lbs of marbles would go right through. the valve seals on a hydrogen tank are precision made to very tight tolerances.
as for hydrogen embrittlement of the tanks it would take time and tanks can be coated to slow it even more.

warm air holds more water vapor that cool air, you can see this every time you set a glass of ice water on a table, dew forms. the water vapor from cars would go into the air until it reached the saturation point(or dew point) then it would dew out. at night as the air cooled, more water would dew out. and one more thing car exhaust is made up of water vapor and co2.

Real Conservatives Conserve
Hooray for Kathleen Parker's decision to buy a hybrid.

Why is it that using energy wastefully is "conservative" and energy efficiency is "liberal?"

Don't fall for the fearmongering blovatroids who claim that energy efficiency means deprivation and the final triumph of the hippies. Energy efficiency is good business and true conservatism - squeezing more value out of every dollar spent on energy.

We should listen to Ronald Reagan, who said the following:

"What is a conservative after all but one who conserves, one who is committed to protecting and holding close the things by which we live...And we want to protect and conserve the land on which we live -- our countryside, our rivers and mountains, our plains and meadows and forests. This is our patrimony. This is what we leave to our children. And our great moral responsibility is to leave it to them either as we found it or better than we found it."

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.