Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, July 16, 2003
Jonah Goldberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
Springer would exploit people, issues in Senate race
by Jonah Goldberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


In a new 30-minute fundraising infomercial Jerry Springer informally announced his intention to run for the Senate from Ohio. In the video, he makes it clear he has a big problem with - of all people - me. But before we get into that, let me explain my problem with him.

Jerry Springer has made a fortune exploiting people. He invites prostitutes, pimps, Klansmen, incestuous freaks, every kind of fool and malcontent onto his show. He gets terribly fat people to strip, just so the audience can laugh at them. Just a few show titles: "Our Brother is Our Pimp," "KKK Moms," "I Stole My 12-year-old's Boyfriend," "My Wife is Sleeping With My Aunt."

He's even exploited dying children. He invited them to have fake weddings on his show because they will in all likelihood die before they can get married for real. Who knows why these poor kids agreed to come on. But we know why Springer did it. He wanted the ratings.

He even added some "final thoughts" at the end of each show in which he'd try, in a minute, to put lipstick on the pig he'd spent the last hour riding. After everyone got a good laugh at some fat man who didn't know that his wife had been sleeping with his brother, Springer would come on and say something like, "Can't we all get along?" and, according to him, that would make the whole thing socially redeeming.

Sure, I've watched the show plenty of times. I've laughed at some of the episodes. I've turned off others in disgust. In fact, turning it off was what Springer and his defenders, and defenders of others who debase the culture, always said we should do if we objected to what Springer was spewing into the airwaves.

Don't like watching freaks and perverts humiliate themselves? Well, turn it off. Jerry Springer has every right to say whatever he wants, they'd insist. Nobody's forcing anyone to watch. If you don't approve, that's your business.

Fair enough. I'm not a prude or a Comstock. If people want to indulge their guilty pleasures, so be it. I think his show has made America a worse place, but I wouldn't advocate banning it.

But now Springer wants to be a senator. In other words, he not only wants to get rich and famous exploiting the hardships of the damaged and the deranged, he thinks there should be no negative consequences for the decisions he's made, including his decision to pay a hooker with a check while he was mayor of Cincinnati. Like a former and unapologetic porn star who's shocked anyone would dare object to her as a baby sitter, Springer says his infamy should be rewarded.

And, if you think he's wrong, or if you think the people who feel Springer is a good role model don't take their citizenship seriously, well then you're a priggish elitist.

That's where I come in. In January while appearing on CNN, I expressed precisely this view: "To me this proves that voter turnout is not this glorious thing ... because if Jerry Springer shows up, he'll bring all these new people to the polls, they will be slack-jawed yokels, hicks, weirdoes, pervs and whatnot."

I stand by that. I don't think voter turnout is always a good thing. If you don't care enough to vote except when a movie star or stunt candidate is running, maybe your perspective is less valuable than that of someone who takes his civic obligations seriously. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Jonah Goldberg's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.