Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, May 06, 2009
John Stossel :: Townhall.com Columnist
Steroids Hysteria
by John Stossel
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


With the return of baseball and a new book on Alex Rodriguez released this week, a fresh round of congressional posturing about steroids is upon us.

Why is it Congress's business?

I asked U.S. Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., about that for my next TV special, "Don't Even Think about Saying That!," which will air this Friday on ABC.

"This is part of our duty," Cummings says, "to protect the American people." Steroids are "a serious public-health problem."

Stearns added, "Teenagers commit suicide."

And Congress will fix it all.

Of course, people like Dr. Gary Wadler testify in Congress that steroids do horrible things.

"The threat is dying! The threat is suicide!" Wadler told me.

I'd heard such scary claims for years. Death by steroids. "Roid rage" worthy of after-school specials.

Years ago, when a pro wrestler beat me up, I was told that steroids drove him to do it. Steroids were blamed for wrestler Chris Benoit killing himself and his family, and teenage baseball star Taylor Hooton's suicide.

But Dr. Norman Fost, a bioethicist at the University of Wisconsin, says it's all bunk. The anti-steroid movement, he says, is filled with hysteria and hype.

"The horror stories about the medical claims . . . some of them are just frankly made up."

Fost insists there's no correlation between injectable steroids and brain tumors.

To my surprise, Wadler admits that's true. And he's not so certain about other claims. When I asked him if steroids cause strokes, he said, "It's on a possible list."

Heart attack?

"The likelihood of anabolic steroid abuse being associated with heart disease is real."

Note the waffle words like "possible" and "associated." He uses them because -- unlike smoking and cancer -- there are no long-term epidemiological studies that show steroids cause those diseases.

Every drug is "associated" with side effects. Advil is associated with ulcers and shock.

It's not that steroids are perfectly safe. But why single them out?

"We don't stop Natasha Richardson from skiing," Fost notes. "We don't stop people from eating lemon meringue pie ... People everywhere take enormous risks way greater than even the hyped-up risks of steroids."

Yes, steroids use is associated with hair loss, acne, testicular atrophy and even growing male breasts. But Fost says those side effects would be minimized if steroids were legal.

"If athletes are going to use these things, it would be better to have them on the table where informed doctors can help them get the right drug with the right dose and fewer side effects.

That's not good enough for Wadler. "I don't think you supervise ... the abuse of a drug."

For Wadler, "abuse" is any use that's not medically necessary. But entire fields of medicine are devoted to "unnecessary" procedures -- breast enhancement, hair replacement, etc. Consenting adults should be free to do pretty much whatever they like to their own bodies.

If steroids are such a terrible threat, there must be lots of high-profile deaths. But Wadler couldn't cite any.

The Chris Benoit 'roid-rage murders and suicide? The medical examiner later said there was no evidence proving the testosterone he was taking caused the crimes. There's evidence that steroids can increase aggression in some people, but, Fost says, "The overwhelming examples of criminal behavior by professional athletes has nothing to do with steroids."

Taylor Hooton's suicide?

"There's no evidence of steroids producing suicidal behavior."

Hooton was taking other risky drugs like Lexapro, which has been shown to cause suicidal thinking.

That wrestler who hit me later said he did it because his boss told him to.

Health issues aside, what about sportsmanship?

"I don't know why you would think this is cheating any more than the hundred of other things athletes do to enhance their performance," Fost said.

Tiger Woods improved his eyesight with surgery. "Janet Evans won a gold medal in swimming," Fost noted, "and bragged about a greasy swimsuit that she was sure had a lot to do with her victory."

Wadler defends the anti-steroid rule because "abuse represents a significant risk to health and, in fact, enhances a criminal element."

But there's only a criminal element because zealots like Wadler insist on making steroid use illegal!

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Stossel blogs at http://blogs.abcnews.com/johnstossel/ is an award-winning news correspondent and author of Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the Shovel--Why Everything You Know is Wrong.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read John Stossel's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Anybody?
Well, John, I see nobody cares, so far.

the wonderful world of steroids
There are many premature deaths in the steroid-infested sports of bodybuilding and powerlifting, people whose names are not familiar to the public-at-large but known to those who follow these sports. How many of them are directly attributable to the use of steroids is, of course, debatable, but just my impression is that these occurrences are at a rate higher than in other sports. I agree that the government has little-to-no business involving itself with this, but the libertarian mantra of "legalize it" is tempting, but really not much of a solution. The problem is more a cultural one where, even if legal, people would manifest the need to place their health at risk for the sake of higher performance--something a little different than Janet Evans wearing a greasy swimsuit. I have a 14-year old son with an interest in the shot-put, as well as some potential, but thanks to steroid culture we as parents will most decidedly not be encouraging him to pursue this beyond the recreational level. And that may be the only answer: people who "just say no." Some years ago the powerlifting world was divided on the issue of steroids, so a "drug-free" powerlifting association was set up. In the end, the freaks wind up being the ones people want to see. The man attempting a 900-lb. bench press, or the woman bench pressing 500 lbs. (yes, these things really exist). One can shake one's head in disappointment and disgust, but in the end the only viable approach is an individual one: just say no.

That Pro Wrestler
John, the pro wrestler you encountered was the perfect metaphor for government. Good at forcing particular outcomes but horrible at juggling tradeoffs.

The wrestler punching you is analogous to government "making an example" of certain dissidents, just to "send a message".

One more thing, would you trust that wrestler to perform eye surgery. Those who want socialize medicine seem to think so.

Joel-De O: "By What Authority?" is THE

QUESTION we should be asking with regard to EVERYTHING this president is doing.

Uh its cheating dude.
Sometimes it seems as though Mr Stossel takes the opposite view of a subject just to find something to write about. I'll bet all I have that if he found out his kids were using steroids he would flip his lid. Come on John, if there is no real health issues with this, why don't you us them yourself? No?. During my younger years I watched two close friends experiment with these drugs and noted the physical and mental changes that began almost instantly. All caped off with severe depression and further drug abuse when the "Glory Years" ended. Hey John, go ask Hank Aaron how he feels about roids and what its done to his records. Or how about Mark McGuire when he sat listening to those parents on live TV at the capital. In your entire column you never mentioned the biggest reason for not doing them. CHEATING.

HGH
FACT: Human growth hormone replacement promises extended quality of life in the elderly. UH-OH Obama's brave new world is not interested extending the life of the elderly.

"Legal" is Different from "Allowed"
I agree with Mr. Stossel that steroids should have a path to legal use. The only way that can currently be done is through FDA clearance after significant testing by a drug company. Then they can be prescribed by a physician.

Oh...wait...would steroids be available in injectable form if they were not produced by a drug company. (Nicely labeled in bottles designed for injection, available to physicians...) Hmmm...guess that they are approved for some uses, otherwise they would not be on the market! What is illegal is their off label use, or use without prescription. In this case, the drugs themselves are not illegal, but rather their unprescribed use is illegal. This returns to the basic question of whether the government should tell me what I can and cannot put in my body. As a Libertarian, I bet you can figure where I stand on that element of law.

Where Mr. Stossel and I part company is that Major League Baseball has decided that their use violates a condition of employment for baseball players. As a business entity MLB has the right to determine conditions of employment, regardless of whether others agree or not. It is sort of like restrictor plates in auto racing engines...that is a rule set out by either CART or NASCAR. It limits performance, but is done in the name of safety. Baseball has decided that they are going to "safeside" this argument in favor of not encouraging their players to use a drug that has potential harmful side effects. They are a business with this right. After all, alcohol is legal and fine, but my company has decided that if you have alcohol in your system you cannot come to work to design or build medical devices. (I think most folks likely agree with that decision my our management.)

So...while taking the government to task over their refusal to allow me to put in my body what I want, I think Mr. Stossel steps a little across the line in saying that a business cannot set these conditions of employment.

Anne
Steroids cause MASSIVE growth. Did Obama inject steroids into his ears?

Here we go again
Sadly, Stossel didn’t take long to veer into the usual libertarian mistake of arguing that not only should these drugs be legal, but, by God, they’re great – everybody would do well to take them.

John, I believe the Constitution (you remember that obsolete document) protects every person’s right to pollute his body with any toxic substance he chooses. Thing is, you’re never going to win anybody over by pooh-poohing the established fact that THIS STUFF IS BAD FOR YOU. To compare steroid injections with a slippery swimsuit is just brain dead.

And that, gentle reader, is why, although it certainly is none of Congress’ business, sports organizations have every right, and indeed the obligation, to police their ranks for the users of this junk.

60+
I have heard that some make you feel better in the morning and recover faster. I would like to feel better in the morning.

My bones kind of ache and sometimes it's hard to get out of bed.

I'm not playing sports anymore, so as long as it doesn't cause severe acne I wouldn't mind having something, as long as it's by mouth.


John in Fl
Stossel never said that baseball didn't have a right to ban the use of steroids or PEDs in their business, just that GOVERNMENT should not be wasting time, effort, and money 'investigating' this garbage. MLB can ban all sorts of things, and in fact they have: steroids, HGH, and amphetemines have all been banned by MLB as a violation of their PED rules.

As for steroids, most of the time when you have problems with 'roid rage' and the like it comes not from use, but abuse. Because the use of steroids has been driven underground, most people who use the drugs actually abuse them by doing massive doses in their cycling of the substances. Using an intense amount of the drugs in a short time frame is bound to cause some serious side effects, but steroids would probably not be any more dangerous than any other drug if prescribed and monitored by a physician.

re: Jason, #7
quote: "I'll bet all I have that if he found out his kids were using steroids he would flip his lid."

Perhaps he would. But how he parents his kids is a different question than what the government does to police individuals. My dad didn't believe the government should ban smoking, but if he had caught me doing it while I was still "under his roof", I'd've been punished. Big difference.


quote: "Come on John, if there is no real health issues with this, why don't you us them yourself?"

Where did he say there were NO "health issues"? Again, take smoking: there are certainly health issues with smoking, and they are proved to contribute to cancer. Should tobacco then be banned? Or should people decide for themselves whether the risks are worth the reward?


quote: "In your entire column you never mentioned the biggest reason for not doing them. CHEATING."

Oh really? It was cheating? What specific MLB rule was being broken? There was no MLB ban on steroids until just a couple of years ago. To cheat, one must break a rule. The problem wasn't the players using steroids, the problem was the owners refusing to set rules against it because it was helping their bottom line.

re: John, #11
quote: "Where Mr. Stossel and I part company is that Major League Baseball has decided that their use violates a condition of employment for baseball players. As a business entity MLB has the right to determine conditions of employment, regardless of whether others agree or not."

I don't think that you'd find disagreement with Stossel on that. He's referring more to the government's involvement. Note that during the 1990s, however, there was NO such MLB ban. Players were not breaking the rules of baseball by using steroids and HGH.

Nowhere in the article does he say that places of employment shouldn't be allowed to set their own terms.

Know what else is a steroid?
Cortisol - Diabetics use this life-saving drug.
Bronchodilators - This is used by asthmatics during attacks.

Anabolic steroids, which your body produces NATURALLY, are also used in treatment of join deterioration. Hell, just living violates steroid rules because you make them in your own body.

Steroids are used to boost the immune systems of people with lymphoma and is even being used as a highly effective treatment to counteract the ill effects of AIDS.

Are these substances you want to ban? They're steroids.

Everyone should watch Bigger, Stronger, Faster: The Side Effects of Being American. It handles the steroid issue wonderfully.

Why all the Noise?
Ask the Republican Governor of California. He is the roids master and has been roiding for years.

Roids must be ok - you Rethugs. even had the roids master address your national convention.

Why is this anybody's business?


Ring.
Ring...Ring..Ring Clue phone. It's for you.

The government focuses on steroids because mostly men use them.

IF the government cared about suicide it would tell you that men commit suicide over 400% more than women, but you do not see congressional investigations.

If the government's intentions were not sexist, then it would pass legislation banning pregnant women from drinking and smoking and doing drugs.

It's a feminist (man bad) thing, so you wouldn't understand.

Personally I don't care.
But the Congressmen love this! Not because it is dangerous, despite what some doctors might say but because this is a great way to get face time on television while pretending to be concerned about something that won't get them into trouble with voters. After all, if they spent the same time studying what to do about the economy or any other critical program they are sure to get some voters upset with whatever decision they might need to make. And it would be hard work. But holding hearings on steroids? Easy and only makes it appear they are concerned but they get even more face time. Where is the loss there (other than lack of time to do what they are being paid to do).

Joel-de
The government has a vested reason for trying to get involved in protecting people against themselves.

Laws were established to protect you from the aggression of someone else. That includes things like being robbed or murdered, being ripped off by a bank, or whatever. We have plenty of laws like those.

But laws to protect you from your own stupidity? Not many. But the seat belt law is another, as is the helmet law. So is this one. And it opens up an entire new field of law for the lawmakers to get involved in.

But if they have this right to keep you safe, consider the ramifications. They would also have the right to tell you where to work, where to live, and whom to marry since all of these things would affect your health and well-being. And they know this.

45 Caliber
TO steal an argument from Von Mises: What is more dangerous, bad drugs or bad ideas? If they can protect you against bad drugs and bad food, why not against dangerous ideas? If they can protect you from yourself, what is the argument to prevent them from keeping you from being exposed to dangerous ideas?

Something to consider when they tell you they want to protect you from steroids or cigarettes or transfats. If they can protect you from yourself, where does that protection stop?

Right
The law should not criminalize risky behavior which directly threatens no one but those involved. Furthermore, the Constitution does not authorize Congress to legislate on such matters. MLB should, however, ban steroid use as part of the price of being an employee in the league, because putting other athletes in the position of having to endanger their health to be competitive or being at a physical disadvantage versus the steroid user is not fair and is not what professional athletics should be about. The downside risk of LASIK surgery are infinitesimal and, any nearsighted golfer who doesn't want to take the risk to compete with Tiger can simply wear glasses.

Semper Libertas
Wrong Dude..Baseball rules at that time indicated that no players shall use controlled substances, which is what roids were. The legal argument is that it does not specifically mention steroids in the bylaws. But tell me, Smart guy, if there was no rules against it why did so many players lie and hide their drug use. Laws in the US and Canada at that time indicated that steroids were illegal.

HMMM
Tell me, is this another case of a Republican's
idea that we are too regulated?

Just last weekend I saw a little blurb on TV,
maybe on E!, about the 10 or 15 most mysterious
show business deaths. One of them was murder/
suicide deaths promulgated by a wrestler (decent
family man) who was on way too many steroids.

Yeh, indeed, we should just ignore it.

re: Jason, #26
Steroids and HGH were not included in the collective bargaining agreement between MLB and the players' union, which is why the union and MLB had to re-negotiate to get steroids and HGH banned and a testing regime put in place. The reason players (and, importantly, owners) hid this from the public is the obvious: the public outcry against steroid users that you saw when this was made public, and the fact that, as you correctly mention, many of the players were using illegal substances (others were using them by prescription from a doctor).

Tammy - wrong on many levels...
First off, Stossel is a libertarian, not a Republican.

Second, do you prefer to be more regulated yourself, or is that something that is okay as long it is for people other than yourself?

Third, try to base your conclusions on sources more complete than "blurbs on E!" This "decent family man" professional wrestler was on "way too many steroids?" How many are too many? Are some steroids just right? And who proved the causation between the steroids and the murder/suicide? If he was on "way too many steroids", there's a good chance he was ingesting 1.5 grams of protein per pound of body weight. Perhaps "way too much meat" caused him to go Jim Jones! Most dedicated athletes and bodybuilders also intake 1-2 gallons of water per day, too. Maybe overhydration caused the murder/suicide! Perhaps Congress should hold hearings on "water abuse" (aside from that prescribed in CIA interrogation manuals!)

You all are right
Fellow commentators, I must confess that after first reading Mr. Stossel's column I was left with the impression that he was defending steroid use, going further than decrying the government making such use illegal. That defense would use would attack MLBs ban on such substances, especially since he began his column referring to A-Rod (A-Roid? - could not resist the humor.)

I thank you for calling me to task on this and appreciate the candor.

Interesting article in regards to this
I know i am late in the game but I thought an interesting blog would put things in perspective in regards to the steroids and cheating argument to baseball.

http://www.squidoo.com/baseball-and-steroids

Steroid may be the latest "enhancement" to the games evolution.

My solution? Any player who fails their drug test gets moved into a new league - the Enhanced Major League of Baseball. Let them do whatever they want in this league. At least we know the limits of their abilities and the playing field will be level.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.