Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 02, 2008
John Stossel :: Townhall.com Columnist
Ron Paul on Immigration
by John Stossel
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


So get rid of all those programs? Every one?

I would. Get rid of the incentives and work toward a real solution.

You oppose "birthright citizenship," which says that the child of an illegal immigrant who gives birth in America is a U.S. citizen. But that right to citizenship is in the Constitution, isn't it?

There's confusion on interpreting the 14th Amendment. It says that if you're under the jurisdiction of the United States, you have a right to citizenship if you're born here. But it's a little bit confusing. If you step over the border and you're illegal, are you really under the jurisdiction? There's a question on that, and I want to clarify it. I don't like to reward people who sneak in for that purpose and get on the welfare rolls.

What about the millions who are here illegally already? Should we deport them?

I don't think anybody could find them. Nobody even knows how many there are. But if they come for welfare benefits and you know they're illegal, (you should) deny them the benefits. If they commit a crime, send them home. Today in many cities, you're not even allowed to ask them their immigrant status. Policemen tell me they can't ask that question to find out if they're illegal. It's politically incorrect to ask a person his immigrant status because that would (be like saying), "If you've broken the law, maybe you ought to go home."

How do you see immigration in the future?

If we have a healthy economy, we would probably have a lot of people coming back and forth working in this country. There was a time when (immigrants did that). That was when they didn't expect to get easy amnesty.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Stossel blogs at http://blogs.abcnews.com/johnstossel/ is an award-winning news correspondent and author of Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the Shovel--Why Everything You Know is Wrong.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read John Stossel's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Dooze finishes
RP has some good ideas, but lacks persuasive tact. As a Congressman, he's not without guilt for the situation we currently find ourselves (value of the dollar market, immigration, government intrusion). He's not been very successful at communicating the state of the State, nor persuading his fellow Congressmen to see the dangers and convincing them to change their voting habits. He'd be better to stay in Congress and keep fighting, than to be stuck as a lame-duck President.

I also still have major concerns with his strict libertarian stand on foreign affairs. The issue of leaving the Iraqi standing without our help is paramount to the incredibly stupid pull-out from Vietnam from our allies, the Hmong people. Have to give it to Bush for not allowing Congress to micro-manage another war. The devestation of life would be a serious return to the last days of our Nation in Cambodia, Vietnam, and those sourrounding nations. RP's policy would be akin to the same thing, . . . just for a different reason than the Dem's! True peace may never be achieved in the ME, but we can at least have more than one ally, as opposed to none.

Dave continues . . .
No other nation in the world allows "anchor babies" to be defined as Citizen's of that country of birth. Their nationality is tied to their parents, until the parents seek citizenship in any other country but their own. Why are we the only nation to permit "anchor babies" automatic Citizenship??? Even International Law, that some of the Supreme's like to cherry-pick for standing, doesn't hold-up.

Making changes to the Supreme's interp of the 14th amendment regarding Title 8 (anchor babies)is going to take YEARS before it can be reviewed. And then, even IF it get's there, be rest assured, some slip-n-fall attorney's will seek financial repatriation like they did/ continue to do for the families of many generations past slaves. It's a pandora's box. If we're smart, we'll teach our own children about the US Constitution (which Scouting does but NOT my kids school!??!?), it's values, and meaning. The majority of the rights lie inthe hands of the States OR the individual citizen's . . . NOT in the Federal Government, . . . and then just say . . NO!!

see last post . . .
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.