Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
John Stossel :: Townhall.com Columnist
Big-Government Conservatives
by John Stossel
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


"The list could go on."

That's what I'm afraid of.

Government will choose which "basic research" to fund? Does he recall the 1970s synthetic-fuels program or the 1990s Superconducting Super Collider boondoggle?

Child tax credits? Just cut taxes for everyone!

Brooks even advocates national service, "forcing city kids to work with rural kids, and vice versa."

Why are pundits and politicians so eager to use force against others?

America became an economic power despite, not because of, Hamiltonian intervention. Hong Kong and much of East Asia went from abject poverty to affluence in a few decades not because their governments gave people "tools they need to compete" -- they didn't -- but because they exercised limited powers.

I wish Brooks and other Hamiltonian conservatives understood that freedom and prosperity have nothing to do with bureaucrats managing society through schooling and tax manipulation. Prosperity comes from leaving people free in a legal system that respects their persons and property so they can pursue their dreams while taking responsibility for their actions. Free people find their own tools if the state leaves them alone.

In the era of big government, the last thing we need are champions of the statist Hamilton. What we need now are champions of the libertarian Jefferson, who said in a very un-Hamiltonian way: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it."

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Stossel blogs at http://blogs.abcnews.com/johnstossel/ is an award-winning news correspondent and author of Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the Shovel--Why Everything You Know is Wrong.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read John Stossel's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Drug Addiction - Legal or Not
Actually, saying that drug addiction is same whether it's legal or not is also false.

As it so happens, in a black market, there is no oversight, public or private, that is commonplace in an open market. As a result, there's little to guarantee quality. Drugs are very often diluted with poisons which render similar highs, but a lower lethal dosage. 100% pure heroin has a very low rate of actually killing anyone -- no more than a handful have died from that -- but the poisons it is typically cut with in the illegal black market *DO* kill people on a regular basis.

If the quality of your stuff is bad, what can you do about it? You can't tell the cops, and you can't organize a boycott. (I have a calendar filled with stories about stupid criminals, and there's two or three in there where a junkie got some inferior drugs and tried getting the government to do something about it.)

Every time I hear about somebody dying from a drug overdose, I want to *scream* -- WAS IT PURE DRUGS OR CUT WITH POISON? They never tell you that. It's a very critical piece of information. If it's cut with poison, well no wonder the person died.

It's similar (once again) to Prohibition when people often made wood alcohol instead of grain alcohol, because it was easier to get. Wood alcohol DOES KILL. Normal alcohol can kill you also, but most people will get so drunk they'll pass out before they have a chance to take a lethal dose. The same isn't true with wood alcohol.

Wood alcohol will also take your sight away, which was the hooch-drinker's signal that he'd drank too much. Hence the term, "blind drunk".

None of these problems exist anymore now that alcohol is legal. Similarly, if drugs were made legal, we'd see far fewer ER visits for drug OD's.

Hamilton
Lalo is right. Stossel and Brooks just don't understand Hamilton. Hamilton was for business, but I don't think he advocated any of the special favors that Stossel sees. Jefferson was an idiot. He was against business, mostly because he didn't understand it. When the price his plantation was getting for tobacco went down, Jefferson blamed the middle-men in England.

Hamilton and Madison did their best to put restraints in the Constitution against mob rule. It worked for a hundred years or so, but now what we have is mob rule. I think we have to admit that our democracy just doesn't work anymore. It is degrading into socialism.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.