Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 12, 2009
John McCaslin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Calling Barack
by John McCaslin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


"The 111th Congress is less than a week old, and already the first tax increase has been put on the table," complains Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), referring to a proposed 156 percent increase (61 cents) per-pack federal excise tax on cigarettes to fund a $35 billion expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program.

"Remember the quote? 'If you make less than a quarter of a million dollars a year, you will not see a single dime of your taxes go up' (President-elect Barack Obama in the October 7 presidential debate)."

As many as 55 percent of American smokers are "working poor," according to ATR, with 1 in 4 living below the poverty line.

GEORGETOWN OUTRAGE

The president of Victims of Pan Am Flight 103 tells Inside the Beltway that the family organization is "outraged" that Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary Arab Studies has invited Libyan leader Moammar Gaddhafi to speak to the campus via satellite in a Jan. 21 videoconference.

"Three Georgetown graduates were murdered on that plane by Gadhafi's operatives, and the 'generous funding' [for the conference] by Exxon Mobil just adds fuel to the fire," says Frank Duggan, the victims group president.

Meanwhile, this column obtained several letters sent to Georgetown President John DeGioia, including one from a 1991 university graduate, (his twin sisters also graduated Georgetown, in 1996), whose brother was among the 270 passengers killed in the 1988 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland.

"President DeGioia, in addition to my brother, there were also Georgetown alumni on the Pan Am 103 flight. How are we honoring these people when we allow the person behind their murder [to] talk about conflict resolution?" writes Mr. Flynn. "I ask you: Would you allow Osama bin Laden to speak?"

In another letter, Hafed Al Ghwell, a Libyan-American and longtime associate of the university's Arab center, says if nothing else Georgetown should distribute copies of Col. Gadhafi's "dismal human rights record ... so your audience can have a sense of the history ... of the speaker before them and grieve the tragic loss of direction of a once-credible Center for Arab Studies."

IN CLOSING

Restoring morale was at the top of his agenda when Michael V. Hayden was appointed to lead the CIA in 2006.

Now, as he prepares to step down two-plus years later, most would agree that Mr. Hayden, a former director of the National Security Agency who retired only last year as an Air Force general, was everything his predecessor - former Florida Rep. Porter Goss, whose 18-month tenure at the helm of the CIA is best described as rocky - wasn't.

Through congressional testimony and other channels, Mr. Hayden aired much of the CIA's so-called "dirty laundry," including describing the spy agency's interrogation and counterterrorism methods, procedures and policies.

One in house memo obtained by Inside the Beltway in 2008 had the CIA director reiterating to staff about waterboarding: "[T]his technique is not part of CIA's current program, has been used in the past on only three detainees, has not been used for nearly five years, and the threat and operational circumstances under which it was previously used have changed dramatically."

Still, as President-elect Barack Obama announces his intentions to replace Mr. Hayden with former Rep. Leon Panetta of California, who also had served as chief of staff to President Clinton, there are still grumblings heard within the media and elsewhere that the agency hasn't gone far enough to reassure a skeptical public.

"We've read and heard a lot over the past few days about the status of morale at CIA," CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield now tells Inside the Beltway. "A lot of this garbage appears to be coming from has-beens, wannabes or never-weres. Unnamed sources who suggest morale is low don't have any idea what's going on here ... .

"CIA employees don't spend a lot of time navel-gazing, pondering their fate, or feeling unappreciated. That's not the culture here, nor is there time. They're busy focusing on the mission and doing everything they can to help keep the country safe. That's what the American people expect of us."

A 2008 survey of CIA employees had 88 percent of respondents describing the agency as the best of all possible places to work.

"If what I'm hearing from reporters is true about shrinking budgets, layoffs, closing of bureaus, etc., I would imagine that morale here is a heck of a lot higher than in most newsrooms these days," Mr. Mansfield concludes.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

John McCaslin is a contributing columnist on Townhall.com and author of Inside The Beltway: Offbeat Stories, Scoops, and Shenanigans from around the Nation's Capital .

Be the first to read John McCaslin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

McCaslin asks:
Remember the quote? 'If you make less than a quarter of a million dollars a year, you will not see a single dime of your taxes go up'
------------------------------------------------
If these people would just choose to cut back on (or even quit) their smoking, then their taxes won't go up.

Taxing & Other Musings
Never being a smoker,it is hard for me to understand why a person would spend a dime for cigarettes,but many enjoy smoking and others are addicted.

These people should not be overtaxed for either reason. If smoking is as bad as it is said to be,and is not allowed almost anywhere,why is it not made illegal?

We all know the reason. Government subsidizes it. They want the taxes. Hypocrisy,thy name is government.


Waterboard a liberal.

Taxes
When Obama says people won't pay a dime more in taxes, he means income taxes (not tobacco, gasoline, etc.). When people say rebates to those not paying taxes is actually income redistribution, he says it is actually a rebate for the other (non-income) taxes they pay. As usual, he tries to have it both ways.

Calling Barack
Why? I've called him every name in the book and he's still going to be annointed next week!

Obama Mother-in-law
Obama’s nephew, a Philadelphia rapper, will also move into the White House. Read it at, http://stopthepresses2.blogspot.com/2009/01/obamas-mother- in-law-and-nephew-will.html

@#*%!
This monster called government keeps people addicted to cigarettes by allowing the poison to be sold. Cigarettes kill people, that is a fact. It might take many years, but the effects will eventually take over and cause many health problems including, but not limited to, cancer.
Those who smoke want nothing more than to be able to stop smoking but are so addicted it is too hard to overcome.Those who have never smoked don't know how difficult it is to overcome. Some people are able to just lay them down while others are more addicted. The tobacco companies make sure to add hundreds of chemicals that help keep a person addicted and the government allows them to continue selling this poison to the public. It is clear to everyone that the government allows it because the government makes a lot of money from Big Tobacco at the expense of citizens.
Insurance won't pay for cessation products or programs, and a lot of smokers don't have insurance anyway because they have to spend money to feed their addiction that could be used to buy health insurance.
Ask anyone who is addicted to anything, be it cigarettes, drugs, alcohol, food, sex, gambling, shopping, entertainment, computer use,and many others, what they would spend their money on if they had to choose.
This is nothing but a "sin tax" and smokers are the current target. Whose vice will be taxed next? With Obama as president we can expect to see a lot more taxes.

Skys the limit!
The Obama Bunch is digging deep to find as many things to tax as possible and have then make up an excuse for it. Saying cigerettes are bad doesn't make taxing the heck out of them right. Gasoline tax hikes will help get the price back up just like O and his cronies wanted in the first place. TAX TAX TAX get used to seeing it more and more. Folks hang to your wallet because in this economic downturn the Reid-Pelosi gang are going to pick your pockets and then leave your great-grandchildren in dept.
We want ot slam O,think about it they expect us to. So to keep the libs off our back we should bash Congress as often as possible,they've been doing for years and look they got control. Because folks got sick of Congress spending and passing stupid policy and laws. Less government intervention should be our battle cry. Just bashing Obama sounds like sour grapes to them,but bash the ones actually taking their money and putting their names on these bills,that's a horse of a different color.

camanintx
Your genius has been apparent on other sites. a You seem to have a problem with your higher thinking skills.

Cigarettes are already taxed to the hilt! Now try to follow...,ANYTHING can be taxed. And our Congress is always looking for new things to tax to "HELP" their constituents with new programs.

I will assume that YOU do not smoke. Let's raise the tax on alcohol, or gasoline, or soda pop, or fast food. If that were the case..., would you be just as happy with your simplistic answer?

Mr. McCaslin's POINT was that, if you levy cigarettes to HELP the poor...,you are actually charging the poor for their own "FREE" health care because the largest percentage of smokers are low income. Get it?!

I bet the smoker BHO...
...won't let them raise taxes on cigarettes...he'll raise taxes on EVERYTHING else, but NOT cigarettes.

You are all missing the point!
Enlarging or creating a government program by taxing consumption of anything doesn't work. When it doesn't other (income) taxes must be raised to fulfill the "obligation". As well, taxing a smoker is mob rule. It ignores the minority and is most certainly discriminatory in the worst way. How would you all feel if government decided to tax the value of your health insurance in order to fund those with none? The sin here is yet more programs to give to those who don't have by taking from those who do have. My idea--- if you can't afford to pay for a child's food, healthcare,or education DON'T HAVE ANY! How dang hard is this to understand?

calling Barack
FSC,Smoker's be warned!,is this Law the solution to the problem?Is our Government trying to poison the smoker's by putting so called fire retardant material's in cigarettes?,many States already have this Law in effect.Taxes,Health Insurance won't matter,you had better have fast life insurance,Population control...Problem solved,one more kick to Freedom of Chioce and one more for Total Government Control.

Rowly, #2
I feel your pain. Been there, done that.

Rowly, # 4
Oops! I was responding to your #4 comment.

Taxes
Just a few facts for those who don't already know.
I have spent my life volunteering for United way, high risk kids, Big Sisters, etc. I have driven THOUSANDS of the welfare recipients to the grocery store, the corner store and bingo halls.
FACT 1: EVERY welfare recipient bought cigarettes with their 'food stamps' (It was supposed to be illegal for a store to accept food stamps for cigarettes, but I believe the law was slackened).
FACT 2: After visiting the grocery store and buying food with food stamps, they asked me to drop them off at a bingo parlor, a bar, a sports event, the corner store for lotto tickets, etc., and they always had plenty of cash on them to buy such things.
FACT 3: As a Legal Assistant, I have seen hundreds of people come into the office on crutches from an accident or injury - or to claim SS Disability. Often, I would see these same individuals throughout the years at clubs dancing, carring a 100+# grill out of Home Depot, lifting an engine out of their car, etc. The people who actually deserve it have to fight for it for years.
Bottom line: There are people who volunteer and there are people who take - and give nothing back in return. I don't volunteer anymore. There's no joy in it. People who are used to living off of the kindness of others will now take from the government. Good luck to them.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.