Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, June 06, 2008
John McCaslin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Specialized Care
by John McCaslin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


The average American adult, most doctors agree, should get an annual medical checkup. Indeed, many insurance companies won't reimburse cardholders unless they wait 12 months between exams.

That said, the Government Accountability Office is critical this week of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for "not administering a mandatory 14-day physical exam to approximately 260 detainees" and "not administering medical screenings immediately upon admission" to federal detention centers.

"One facility had sick-call request forms that were available only in English, whereas the population was largely Spanish-speaking," the GAO notes. "Another did not maintain alien medical records on site. One facility's staff failed to obtain informed consent from the detainee when prescribing psychiatric medication. Finally, another facility did not have medical staff on site to screen detainees arriving after 5 p.m."

The GAO said it observed instances of noncompliance with ICE medical care standards at three of the 23 detention facilities visited. On the other hand, GAO says, it "observed instances where detainees were receiving specialized care at the facilities visited."

Warner or Webb

Bill O'Reilly of the Fox News Channel is putting his money on former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner to become presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's vice-presidential pick.

"I think it's going to be Warner in Virginia," the talk-show host predicted during Wednesday night's broadcast of "The O'Reilly Factor," even though Mr. Warner, a resident of Old Town Alexandria, is his party's U.S. Senate candidate to fill the seat of retiring Republican Sen. John Warner.

Popular on both sides of the aisle while governor, the fiscally minded Mr. Warner briefly considered running for president in 2008, then abruptly bowed out, citing family reasons.

If Mr. Obama does not select Mr. Warner, then Mr. O'Reilly guesses he will tap another Virginia Democrat, Sen. Jim Webb, who was Navy secretary under President Reagan and, we might recall, led the fight in 1982 for including a black soldier in the statue of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.

"I'm going to go with a Virginia guy -- either Warner or Webb," said Mr. O'Reilly.

Fear Felix

We had to laugh at Rep. Ted Poe of Texas when trying to make sense of what energy can be produced from the Texas landscape.

The Republican congressman recalled that the dusty plains of western Texas were once home to thousands of oil derricks until such time environmentalists replaced them with clean-turning windmills.

"Texas is the wind energy capital of North America, supplying power to over 1 million homes," an impressed Mr. Poe pointed out. "But now the environmental-fear lobby wants to stop these turbines because they may pose a threat to bats and birds."

Seriously?

He explains that the lobby is worried that "bats and the birds that fly at night may be running into the windmills," although he remembers in third grade learning that bats "have a radarlike ability to navigate at night in caves and open terrain."

He quoted one National Academy of Sciences report as stating: "Birds have more to fear from high buildings, power lines and cats than they do from the blades of windmills."

Below minimum wage

A trucker from Houston told Rep. John Carter of Texas that he just hauled a load from Houston to San Diego, got paid $1,800 for the trip, but his fuel costs were $1,700.

Citizen and slave

Congress this week moved to designate a suburban Maryland federal building that houses the U.S. Census Bureau as the "Thomas Jefferson Census Bureau Headquarters Building," given Jefferson, as secretary of state, proposed and supervised the first modern census in world history in 1790.

The 1790 Census, our review shows, counted 3.9 million Americans, the majority (747,550) living in Virginia. The next highest populations were in Pennsylvania (433,611), North Carolina (395,005), Massachusetts (378,556), and New York (340,241). The least populated state was Delaware (59,096).

Interestingly enough, the 1790 Census also listed the number of slaves held in America (694,207). Most slaves (292,627) were kept in Virginia, followed by South Carolina (107,094), Maryland (103,036), North Carolina (100,783), Georgia (29,264), and New York (21,193).

No slaves were counted in Massachusetts, Maine or Vermont, although New Hampshire had 157 that year.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

John McCaslin is a contributing columnist on Townhall.com and author of Inside The Beltway: Offbeat Stories, Scoops, and Shenanigans from around the Nation's Capital .

Be the first to read John McCaslin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Wetbacks: A Modest Proposal
Take Fingerprints, Retinal Scan, DNA, Photo.

First Time Offenders are returned to Mexico.

Second Time Offenders are sterilized and returned to Mexico (I don't CARE about country of origin).

Third Timers and Felons are tatooed, lose a finger and are returned to Mexico.

Let the Fourth Time be a Surprise.


The only
immigration reform we need is to close our borders and only let people that are LEGAL cross the border. Start shooting a few coyotes and there'll be fewer illegals getting accross. If the libbers want to protect the illegals then protect them down Mexico way! Put out playing cards on the coyotes and put a reward out for them. They'll stop.

Handling medical care for Hispanics...
--
...isn't exactly rocket science. I'm a third-generation Italian-American who grew up with no real knowledge of any Romance language; not even Italian, which I could and did take as a foreign language in high school and college.

(Most Italian-Americans descend from folks who immigrated to this country from the southernmost provinces - Campagnia, Abruzzi, Sicily - more than a century ago. What's taught in American schools is the Tuscan dialect. *Northern* Italian. Barely recognizable if you've grown up hearing your grandparents drop into 19th-Century Sicilian for "private" conversations.)

For something like five years, I ran clinics for (almost entirely) Hispanic migrant farm workers, and learned very quickly to get along without translators.

I even wrote up the equivalent of the "sick-call forms" discussed above, as well as Emergency Department discharge instructions for the Spanish-speaking (mostly Puerto Rican) Americans living here in South Jersey. Plenty of good "crib" books for that sort of thing in the medical bookstores.

Spanish is the easiest goddam language on the planet.

So how the hell can the U.S. Immigration and Customs Service clowns *NOT* have this rough spot taped, spackled, and sanded smooth?

What are they using for medical officers? Chiropractors?

--

Specialized Care
This is America, you know, the United States of ... Why wouldn't sick call request forms be printed in English? Contrary to what socialist democrats like "Splash" Kennedy and "Lurch" Kerry think, English is the language of America.

Besides, why are we giving medical care to criminals? They are breaking the law by entering our country illegally, so the only consideration they should be given is to surrender or be shot on sight.

Once captured, they should be photographed and fingerprinted, then deported with the warning that if they are captured again, they will be shark-bait.

No need to feed them, clothe them or give them medical care. They came with nothing, they'll leave with nothing. End of story.

Cordially,

Mike Niederberger
"Sin City" NV

SJ Doc etc.
If you could pick up Spanish so quick, why can't Central and South Americans pick up English just as easily? Are you calling them lazy or just less intelligent than Anglos? And if you tried to get medical service in Italy and only spoke English, how would you fare? (Actually bad comparison, since British/American global dominance has spread English far wider than Italian, but you get my drift).

If a prisoner is not an American citizen, they should be quickly deported to their country of origin and let THEM deal with the health care issues. Oh, the prisoners down there are not hand-held by ACLU lawyers who change their diapers and hand them a fresh blanky every 3 hours? Too bad! I back the LEGAL process of immigration, but for anyone who flaunts our naturalization laws AND commits crimes against Amrerican citizens that lead to their arrest, they don't deserve citizenship or the perks that go with it. Hell, I'm native-born and would have to jack someone's car to get comparable medical care unless I earned it. Isn't there something wrong with that picture?

RW&B - Why can't the spics speak Anglo?
--
Asks RedWhite&Blue:

"If you could pick up Spanish so quick, why can't Central and South Americans pick up English just as easily?"


For pretty much the same reason Puerto Ricans - who are American citizens from birth - have trouble with it.

English is a damned difficult language, described by one commentator as the result of efforts on the part of Norman men-at-arms to make time with Saxon barmaids. And the American language isn't much easier.

I've presently got a houseful of grandkids, and I'm providing linguistic feedback for one (each) 9-year-old, 7-year-old, and 3-year-old, coaching at their respective levels on the vicissitudes of American as she is spoke, including variations in spelling that have been driving the 7-year-old (just finishing up 1st grade) to screams of frustration.

The difficulty with those who have highly creolized languages like Spanish and Portuguese and Italian as their milk tongues is that English is insanely complicated by comparison.

Most of us don't notice that complication any more than fish notice the water in which they swim, but I was raised to know grandparents who could not read (and barely understood spoken) English, and my next-door neighbor - a farmer - positioned his migrant workers' quarters along our property line, so I grew up playing with Puerto Rican kids every summer.

They learned to wheedle my mom in English for goodies even as I learned to say "Por favor, senora?" and look cute for their mothers.

Don't knock Puerto Rican cooking if you haven't tried it.

As for why the Mexicans get medical care....

Well, hell. Come work the Emergency Department some time.

*YOU* say "no" to somebody in acute pain or respiratory distress.

I can't. I took an oath.

--

Spics???
Ha-ha! Not sure my purpose was to slur Latinos. Of course, that's what many assume if you're for legal immigration. No, my question was directed at the hidden assumptions one often finds at the bottom of accommodationist rhetoric. "WE must accommodate THEM because we're superior white saviors and should care for the poor ignorant brown-skinned children since they can't care for themselves" is the unspoken racism often lurking under the surface of the well-meaning liberal. Not to say you're a liberal or that this attitude is true in your case, I was merely asking a provocative question.

As for languages, I thought Spanish was pretty damned hard when I took it in high school, where I managed a C average with difficulty. During the same period I was placed in honors English and maintained straight A's, quite exceptional among the native speakers in my grade level. Oh well! My aberrant personal experiences aside, I'll concede the point since I never methodically compared the two languages.
(continued)

Spics??? continued...
As for your invitation to the Emergency Department I politely rejoin with a hearty "NO THANKS!" You have my automatic respect for what you do, and I approve of your conscientious approach. However, my complaint about providing medical care is not about emergency care. No one with a heart softer than stone could turn a person of any nationality out to suffer in the street. Nor am I against "Mexicans" getting health care. I believe my comments were directed specifically at illegal aliens incarcerated for criminal activity committed within our borders. My argument is that they should be immediately deported instead of keeping them here and doling out quality health care, cable TV, and three squares a day as "punishment". In my first reply, I did not think I needed to explicitly state the obvious exception of emergency medical care since the context of the article under discussion indicated routine medical care such as a physical exam.

So with such exceptions and conditions explicitly stated or reiterated, I ask again, should an illegal alien incarcerated for criminal behavior receive better long-term health care for free than the average law-abiding citizen can afford? To remove completely the question of racism, compare a law-abiding U.S. citizen of Honduran ancestry with a Honduran citizen who illegally entered our borders and was subsequently arrested and incarcerated for raping a Guatemalan woman. Should he receive better long-term health care on our dime than the hard-working, law-abiding Honduran-American can afford to buy (thanks in part to high taxes!)? How about better care than his Guatemalan-American victim? Or, should his sorry a** be deported forthwith to his native country? I think the latter would be a more just and prudent use of tax dollars, and would better uphold the integrity of our laws and borders.

Lastly, thanks for your service, whether or not we agree.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.