Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, June 06, 2008
John McCaslin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Specialized Care
by John McCaslin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



The average American adult, most doctors agree, should get an annual medical checkup. Indeed, many insurance companies won't reimburse cardholders unless they wait 12 months between exams.

That said, the Government Accountability Office is critical this week of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for "not administering a mandatory 14-day physical exam to approximately 260 detainees" and "not administering medical screenings immediately upon admission" to federal detention centers.

"One facility had sick-call request forms that were available only in English, whereas the population was largely Spanish-speaking," the GAO notes. "Another did not maintain alien medical records on site. One facility's staff failed to obtain informed consent from the detainee when prescribing psychiatric medication. Finally, another facility did not have medical staff on site to screen detainees arriving after 5 p.m."

The GAO said it observed instances of noncompliance with ICE medical care standards at three of the 23 detention facilities visited. On the other hand, GAO says, it "observed instances where detainees were receiving specialized care at the facilities visited."

Warner or Webb

Bill O'Reilly of the Fox News Channel is putting his money on former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner to become presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's vice-presidential pick.

"I think it's going to be Warner in Virginia," the talk-show host predicted during Wednesday night's broadcast of "The O'Reilly Factor," even though Mr. Warner, a resident of Old Town Alexandria, is his party's U.S. Senate candidate to fill the seat of retiring Republican Sen. John Warner.

Popular on both sides of the aisle while governor, the fiscally minded Mr. Warner briefly considered running for president in 2008, then abruptly bowed out, citing family reasons.

If Mr. Obama does not select Mr. Warner, then Mr. O'Reilly guesses he will tap another Virginia Democrat, Sen. Jim Webb, who was Navy secretary under President Reagan and, we might recall, led the fight in 1982 for including a black soldier in the statue of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.

"I'm going to go with a Virginia guy -- either Warner or Webb," said Mr. O'Reilly.

Fear Felix

We had to laugh at Rep. Ted Poe of Texas when trying to make sense of what energy can be produced from the Texas landscape.

The Republican congressman recalled that the dusty plains of western Texas were once home to thousands of oil derricks until such time environmentalists replaced them with clean-turning windmills.

"Texas is the wind energy capital of North America, supplying power to over 1 million homes," an impressed Mr. Poe pointed out. "But now the environmental-fear lobby wants to stop these turbines because they may pose a threat to bats and birds." Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

John McCaslin is a contributing columnist on Townhall.com and author of Inside The Beltway: Offbeat Stories, Scoops, and Shenanigans from around the Nation's Capital .

Be the first to read John McCaslin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Spics??? continued...
As for your invitation to the Emergency Department I politely rejoin with a hearty "NO THANKS!" You have my automatic respect for what you do, and I approve of your conscientious approach. However, my complaint about providing medical care is not about emergency care. No one with a heart softer than stone could turn a person of any nationality out to suffer in the street. Nor am I against "Mexicans" getting health care. I believe my comments were directed specifically at illegal aliens incarcerated for criminal activity committed within our borders. My argument is that they should be immediately deported instead of keeping them here and doling out quality health care, cable TV, and three squares a day as "punishment". In my first reply, I did not think I needed to explicitly state the obvious exception of emergency medical care since the context of the article under discussion indicated routine medical care such as a physical exam.

So with such exceptions and conditions explicitly stated or reiterated, I ask again, should an illegal alien incarcerated for criminal behavior receive better long-term health care for free than the average law-abiding citizen can afford? To remove completely the question of racism, compare a law-abiding U.S. citizen of Honduran ancestry with a Honduran citizen who illegally entered our borders and was subsequently arrested and incarcerated for raping a Guatemalan woman. Should he receive better long-term health care on our dime than the hard-working, law-abiding Honduran-American can afford to buy (thanks in part to high taxes!)? How about better care than his Guatemalan-American victim? Or, should his sorry a** be deported forthwith to his native country? I think the latter would be a more just and prudent use of tax dollars, and would better uphold the integrity of our laws and borders.

Lastly, thanks for your service, whether or not we agree.

Spics???
Ha-ha! Not sure my purpose was to slur Latinos. Of course, that's what many assume if you're for legal immigration. No, my question was directed at the hidden assumptions one often finds at the bottom of accommodationist rhetoric. "WE must accommodate THEM because we're superior white saviors and should care for the poor ignorant brown-skinned children since they can't care for themselves" is the unspoken racism often lurking under the surface of the well-meaning liberal. Not to say you're a liberal or that this attitude is true in your case, I was merely asking a provocative question.

As for languages, I thought Spanish was pretty damned hard when I took it in high school, where I managed a C average with difficulty. During the same period I was placed in honors English and maintained straight A's, quite exceptional among the native speakers in my grade level. Oh well! My aberrant personal experiences aside, I'll concede the point since I never methodically compared the two languages.
(continued)
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.