Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
John McCaslin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Lame 'Dodos'?
by John McCaslin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Inside the Beltway overheard one CBS News veteran in Washington, who shall remain nameless, refer to the network's struggling anchor Katie Couric as a "lame duck."

This after it was all but confirmed in recent days that the former NBC "Today" show host will be shown the door if she doesn't exit through it first.

Meanwhile, when it comes to viewership, Business Week's Ron Grover reported this week that Mrs. Couric's imminent departure "has been getting better word of mouth than just about anything CBS has put on the air in the past year.

"Is she leaving? Of course she is. And it may well be after the presidential election, even though the public relations department at CBS has turned blue denying it. But there's a bigger question: Why do we need Couric — or Charlie Gibson or Brian Williams — to read us the news every night? Simply put, TV's evening news is a dinosaur that should go the way of the dodo bird."

Crossing the line

Following up on the question about whether Americans need any of the "big three" network television anchors to "read" the news every night, the journalism watchdog group Media Research Center (MRC) points out that an unhealthy dose of personal biases and opinions are being injected into the nightly newscasts, too.

Here are just a few recent examples cited by the Washington-based MRC:

NBC's Lee Cowan: "When NBC News first assigned me to the Barack Obama campaign, I must confess my knees quaked a bit. ... I wondered if I was up to the job. I wondered if I could do the campaign justice."

ABC's Charles Gibson: "[Barack] Obama challenged Americans to confront the country's racial divide. An extraordinary speech."

ABC's Claire Shipman: "[Mr. Obama] gave a great speech. I think it was a brave speech."

ABC's George Stephanopoulos: "As a speech, it was sophisticated, eloquent."

CNN's Campbell Brown: "It was daring."

Got it?

It's tough enough keeping up with all the new technology to have to worry about the myriad perpetrators of spam and such.

We'll leave that seemingly impossible task to Rep. Phil Gingrey, Georgia Republican, who has just introduced H.R. 5769 to "prohibit the sending of a text message containing an unsolicited advertisement to a cell phone number listed on the national do-not-call registry."

Que pasa?

The English as the Official Language Act has been introduced in both houses of Congress, stating that no person has a right, entitlement or claim to have the U.S. government or any of its officials or representatives act, communicate, perform or provide services, or provide materials in any language other than English.

Big egg

President Bush didn't buy into man-made "global warming" during his first seven years in office, so why expect him to now as a lame-duck president?

Consider the letter sent this week by Rep. Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice chiding the Bush administration for sending "a grand total of zero participants" to a major international renewable-energy conference to combat global warming that just wrapped up in Berlin. Some 200 representatives from more than 50 countries attended.

"The Bush administration talks a big game on cooperation, but is conspicuously absent when the world tries to cooperate on renewable energy and global warming," the Democratic chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming wrote to Miss Rice.

"The planet needs a global commitment if we are to save it, and this slight to the international community will not solve anything, and only serve to reinforce the poor standing of this administration on the international stage."

We'll let you know if and when the secretary writes back.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

John McCaslin is a contributing columnist on Townhall.com and author of Inside The Beltway: Offbeat Stories, Scoops, and Shenanigans from around the Nation's Capital .

Be the first to read John McCaslin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

The world and its resources are

finite. They cannot be saved. However, their consumption rate can be slowed.

Global warming Hoax
There is global warming. If you look at a chart of temperatures over the last several hundred years there are times when there are global warming and there are times when there are global cooling. But it is wrong to insist it is due to man-caused reasons. And it is further wrong to insist it is man's obligation to keep the temperature down, considering that we are still below average for the last thousand years or so.

Please check out iceagenow.com. It has plenty of scientific proof that man isn't the problem. Why should we spend trillions of dollars to fix a problem that isn't something we can fix? And why should we do it to enable a couple of companies who have CO2 removal equipment at VERY expensive prices to make a killing?

Man simply isn't powerful enough to do much to the world. Get over it.

The News
It is likely we will see the news disappear as long as liberals control so few media outlets. They have to compete with the internet and the radio somehow...

I hope they're joking
That's the MRC's evidence of media bias?

Calling a speech "extraordinary"? Can't speeches be extraordinary in positive and negative ways?

Doesn't everybody assigned to a new task hope they will live up to expectations? or in the instance cited: ... "hope to do the campaign justice"

In 1939, Time named Hitler its Man of the Year, explaining that his "greatness" made him a compelling choice for the distinction...greatness in the sense of historical importance. The same article blasted Hitler as the incarnation of evil. So when it is said Obama made a "great" speech...how does the statement reflect a liberal bias?

Sophisticated, brave and daring also carry enough lattitude to make them apolitical...or, put another way, unbiased. Certainly to apply those terms to a speech doesn't foreclose the possibility of heavy criticism in the sentence that follows them.

No, this is a big stretch in the never ending right-wing whinning fest about media bias. I've never heard of the MRC. Is it one of those wingnut organizations?

Perry
Are you trying to claim the media is not biased, or are you really that stupid. The choice of words can easily be a reflection of bias, as can the praise of one party or individual as opposed to another party or individual is definitely a way of providing support of the party praised. If it was even handed, that would be another story; but the bias in favor of left wing and far left wing people and ideas from all of the news and commentary of the big three is certainly indicative of bias in those organizations.

Couric not a "lame duck"
She's always been just LAME, since she was chosen as replacement to Deb Norville!

News "anchors"
I watch the European news feeds on cable tv. The difference between a European "newsreader" and the spiffy American "anchor" is night and day. The Europeans have no giggles, no banter, no bizzaz. Just a person reading the news and providing intros to video clips.

I highly recommend these programs. The ones in English are good and some of the ones in French and Italian have translations. Even when they don't have translations, you can figure out what's going on.

I guess we're doomed to live out the legacy of "Uncle Walter" Klunkheit for a few more years.

Barry


Do not go quietly into that good night
Rage, rage, Katie against the night. Then go away with your millions of dollars "earned" by doing precisely nothing.

As to bias: If the world doesn't work the way you want it to then everything is biased.

Listening to the major media and expecting anything approximating the "news" is simply foolish. It might get your heart beating but it is cognitive masturbation in the end.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.