Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, January 31, 2008
John McCaslin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Keep Your Mittens
by John McCaslin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Suffice it to say, the Smithsonian Institution is not buying into the "global warming" hysteria being spread by Al Gore.

While in the District in recent days, professor Jeff Bennett of the Crawford School of Economics and Government at Australian National University toured the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, where he snapped photographs, since forwarded to Inside the Beltway, of two displays that caught his eye — both dealing with climate change and "the Future."

"Initiation of glacial conditions may be triggered by surprisingly rapid climate changes," reads one display. "Therefore, the minor global-cooling trend of recent decades ... is being carefully watched and studied."

Global-cooling trend?

Explains the next display: "the period 1890-1945 A.D. was abnormally warm, and there have been signs of cooling in the last few decades."

Mr. Bennett is the newest Julian Simon Fellow at the Property and Environment Research Center, the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to free-market environmentalism.

Protecting troops

For safety's sake, the State Department recommends that Americans not travel to Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria and Somalia, among other nations. (Given that the Taliban is spreading its roots in Pakistan, you might think twice about a holiday there, too.)

Now we learn from Texas Rep. Ted Poe that the Texas Department of Public Safety this week issued its own travel warning: "Due to the increased rising level of violence in Mexico — which is attributed to drug cartels, violent criminal organizations, and increased presence of military personnel in some Mexican border communities — it is recommended that persons be discouraged from traveling to Mexican border towns ... Nuevo Laredo, Matamoros, Reynosa, Rio Bravo, Miguel Aleman, and Ciudad Juarez."

Meanwhile, U.S. Army officials at Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas, have actually declared travel to Juarez off-limits for U.S. military personnel.

"In other words," Mr. Poe, a Republican, points out, "Fort Bliss, the United States Army, they can go to Iraq, they can go to Afghanistan, but they can't go to Juarez right across the river because it is too dangerous."

Dorgan's question

The Trends Journal, if you haven't read, is forecasting the "Panic of '08."

The publication foresees "failing banks, busted brokerages, toppled corporate giants, bankrupt cities, states in default, foreign creditors cashing out of U.S. securities. Whatever the spark, the stage is set for panic in the streets. When the giant firms fall, they'll crush the man on the street."

That said, North Dakota Sen. Byron L. Dorgan makes this point this week: "We were told this morning that the president is going to ask for another $70 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan. That is on top of the $196 billion he asked for last year in this fiscal year that we are in now. That is $16 billion a month, $4 billion a week. He wants another $70 billion. That will take us well over two-thirds of a trillion dollars.

"I ask the question: Is it not time we started investing some at home? It is not time we started taking care of things here at home?"

John McCanine

Good grief, who isn't conducting political polls in 2008?

For what it's worth, the Pet Supplies "Plus" chain reveals that a majority 47 percent of respondents would leave their pets in the care of Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, while 34 percent would trust their pooch with Republican Sen. John McCain.

Counting chickens?

After Tuesday's primary victory in Florida, Republican Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign is so convinced — even before Super Tuesday voting next week — the candidate will go all the way it has headlined its latest news advisory: "On to the Nomination."

"John McCain's momentum is now unstoppable," it brags.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

John McCaslin is a contributing columnist on Townhall.com and author of Inside The Beltway: Offbeat Stories, Scoops, and Shenanigans from around the Nation's Capital .

Be the first to read John McCaslin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.


News Articles On This Topic
 
Popular Articles By McCaslin

Fighting "global warming hysteria"
EPA chief Stephan Johnson had a perfect opportunity to fight the "global warming hysteria being spread by Al Gore" when he appeared before the Senate Public Works Committee recently. He could have educated the senators on how Mars is warming and how CO2 increases trail temperature increases. Instead he only claimed the the Bush Administration's approach to fighting global warming was better.

As much as you'd like to personalize global warming with Gore, you have to include W himself in "spreading global warming hysteria" by mentioning it in his SOTU address.

TH is one of the few places that still buys this stuff.

Global Warming Temperatures
A few recent climate facts. The hottest year was not 1998, it was 1934. Ten of the hottest years did not occur after 1990, but 4 of the hottest years occurred before 1940. And this happened before the significant increase in CO2 emissions caused by WWII.

Since 1998 there has been no significant increase in global temperatures. Even though CO2 emissions have increased by close to 5% during the same period. The IPCC has not yet taken these facts into account in their predictions.

??
The only thing that GLOBULL WARMING has done is make AL GLOBULL WARMING GORE


RICH RICH RICH DIRT RICH

He is still flying around the worlds DESTROYING our atmosphere with his BIG PERSONEL JETS

Better hide Kuchinich for he and his UFO and AL G are ready for blastoff to Mars and make them there MARTIANS stop driving their MUVS(SUV) because we now know that Mars is melting and it has nothing to do with THE WIZARD OF OZ wicked witch(HITLERY)

What?
Chuck, what the hell are you talking about?

Glaciers!
Some years ago, Al Gore as VP was up at Glacier National Park, Momtana getting a first hand lake at well---the Glaciers. He was railing about how fast the Glaciers were melting, and had the local Liberals, enviromentalists and assorted crack pots wetting their pants and swooning about Al's astute observations.

Now, an old Clod Hopper like me having just fallen off the back of some turnip truck got thinking. Shucks, are we to believe there never was an ice age according to what we learned in school? But if there was, where did all the ice go? I seem to recollect that Glaciers are constantly moving and eventually will disappear, either by melting or falling into the ocean, was what I read wrong?

Oh, by the way, here a few days ago an Alberta Clipper hit the area packing -30 with a -45 wind chill factor temperatures. Did I imagine this? I know, I know, I ought to go back to shucking my corn and leave the deep thinking to Al Gore.

Smithsonian Institution says
"Initiation of glacial conditions may be triggered by surprisingly rapid climate changes," reads one display. "Therefore, the minor global-cooling trend of recent decades ... is being carefully watched and studied."

con·sen·sus
n.
1. An opinion or position reached by a group as a whole

That would be the whole group that agrees in this case. There is also a clear consensus among those not included in Al Gore's consensus that, that other consensus is pure bunk.




Glaciers!
Some years ago, Al Gore as VP was up at Glacier National Park, Momtana getting a first hand lake at well---the Glaciers. He was railing about how fast the Glaciers were melting, and had the local Liberals, enviromentalists and assorted crack pots wetting their pants and swooning about Al's astute observations.

Now, an old Clod Hopper like me having just fallen off the back of some turnip truck got thinking. Shucks, are we to believe there never was an ice age according to what we learned in school? But if there was, where did all the ice go? I seem to recollect that Glaciers are constantly moving and eventually will disappear, either by melting or falling into the ocean, was what I read wrong?

Oh, by the way, here a few days ago an Alberta Clipper hit the area packing -30 with a -45 wind chill factor temperatures. Did I imagine this? I know, I know, I ought to go back to shucking my corn and leave the deep thinking to Al Gore.

Gore's catharsis
My daughter's 10th grade science class had the assignment of watching both "The Great Global Warming Swindle" and "An Inconvenient Truth". The class determined that 9 minutes of "IT" elaborated on points using data from research, and the rest was emotion based conjecture on the the part of Al Gore (who desperately needs to MATTER!). According to the class's findings, "TGGWS" spent 34 minutes expounding upon data gleaned from scientific research.

Why all the appeal to emotion if the data is sound?

"Global warming"? Yawn!
Why am I skeptical about "global warming"? Let's consider the facts:

- When it's unseasonably warm, people blame it on global warming.

- When it's unseasonably cold, people blame it on global warming.

- When we have an unusually dry season, people blame it on global warming.

- When we have an unusually rainy season, people blame it on global warming.

- When we have a busy hurricane season, we are told that it's caused by global warming.

- When we have a slow hurrican season, we are told that it's caused by global warming.

To put it simply, the global warming alarmists are like the boy who cried "wolf." They've given too many false alarms to be taken seriously.

Ignore it and it will go away
Having lived about 2/3 of my life, if you go by actuarial tables, I have found that in cases when somebody tells me the world is coming to an end unless I stop doing everything I enjoy and hide under the bed, it is best to ignore the whole thing and it will go away. 98% of the things that people wedgify themselves about do not come to pass at all, and of the 2% that do, most are not remotely similar to what the wedgified predicted.

Remember when Saddam set those oil wells on fire, and Hollyweird started shrieking that they would burn for centuries and this would bring on Nuclear Winter and the Earth would not recover in our lifetimes? Remember that Red Adair and Co. put out those fires in under a year and no effect to the atmosphere was found at all?

And what about Y2K? Weren't there screaming idiots still hiding under their beds in Los Angeles when 2000 had dawned in New Zealand and Australia the day before and both countries were alive and well (if somewhat hung over)?

Isn't it true that all the food that would save us will now kill us, and all the food that would kill us will save us?

Ignore it. Get on with your life. Tomorrow they will be hollering about something else. Ignore that, too.

How true, AudiR10
I remember when in 8th grade seeing a "scientific" film strip that included cold weather fashions we would need to wear when the impending ice age arrived. That, I believe, was the fault of deodorant. Microwave ovens were harbingers of rotting tumor death, tampons had women dropping like flies from TSS, and eggs became the enemy of anyone who valued coronary health. I also remember this odd, medieval device sold in running magazines to keep the uteruses (uteri?) of female joggers from unceremoniously plopping out in the middle of a run.


oldsocialworker
I remember lots of those idiot fads, but i missed the uterus retention device. Must have been reading the wrong mags. A friend of mine did purchase the Charles Atlas Dynamic Tension system. It worked about as well as the usual tv exerciser.

As Seen On TV
would be the perfect category for that Algore film...History, Discovery, and NatGeo have run amok with their own brand of hysteria.

Ha, Savage!
Your friend should have acquired one of those machines that jiggled your butt with a great big, vibrating strap! Now THAT would have given him the Brazilian butt of his dreams!

Today it is snowing in Canada
and people are running around screaming as if they have just discovered they do not live in Hawaii. We are expecting a foot of snow and some freezing rain. It is FEBRUARY and this is CANADA. February in Canada is what Jesus meant in Matthew 24 when he said *Except that those days be shortened, no man would survive.*

Global what?

On my refrigerator I have a post card from the Blizzard of 1977 which left Buffalo buried under 12 feet of snow and us trapped in our offices for 3 days. And I did not hear nearly as much shrieking when the snow began to fall. In fact, most people did not realize it was a Century Storm until it was time to go home and the police would not let them onto the street with their cars.

The sunspot cycle is ending and the weather is going back to what it was 30 years ago.

Nothing to see here. Go to work.

Sheldon
If you are that ignorant I guess the jokes on you.

The snow caps on Mars is melting also per the Scientist but what they fail to tell you is that the Martians have biugger SUVs than we do, I thought I would help you out since you seem to be in the dark or are just a STUPID LIB or agree that GW is a set theory.

Wheres Kuchinich and Louis Farekahn when you need them

Re: the comments on troops


The comment on Juarez vs Iraq.

The difference is that the troops can take their rifles to Iraq.

The reason
The reason that so much of this planet has had drought for so many centuries is that we’ve been in an ice age, and the water needed for normal condensation has been frozen into glaciers. Glaciers are frozen water needed as condensation for barren and frozen lands of this planet, causing drought and flooding. When glaciers melt, some water runs into the oceans. Some water thaws the ground below where the glacier was, and soaks into the ground. Some water evaporates into the upper atmosphere.

The heat of the sun, and the absence of cold from glaciers and sea ice will cause more water to be evaporated from the oceans, lakes, and rivers into the upper atmosphere than there presently is; and the winds will blow it evenly around the world, providing normal rainfall world-wide, even where there presently is drought, and barren and frozen land, preventing flooding.

The worldwide rainfall will cause long-dormant seeds under glaciers and in barren lands to sprout and grow into new plants; the best way to go green. The new plants will inhale carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen, which we breathe. There will be so many new plants, that we might have to increase the amount of carbon dioxide we generate, to provide enough for all of them

A glacier in Greenland is melting, returning the land to the way it was a millennium ago. Larger crop yields are already the result, and the codfish have returned. Put the UN there.

Snow fell before leaves, and a month before winter started. Parts of the country have record low temperatures. We need global warming as soon as possible.

Western NY needs the goracle!!
Now that the ice boom in Lake Erie has broken in two places sending solid ice down the Niagara River we need al-NOW!! Please, we were promised palm trees and flamingos in Western New York. We were told we would be the Miami of the north. So, al come to us with your big-A lear jet and get rid of this mess. The river is solid ice and threatening the water intakes, which is bad news for downstate.
Honest al, you can stay with us. We have tons of food. I will await your call.

AudiR10
And don't forget the predictions about mad-cow disease. About a decade ago when I was still reading far-left magazines, I read that there were many more cases of mad-cow disease than the authorities were admitting and that an epidemic was headed our way.

Didn't happen.

King Liberal
Check this out, a leftist who denies global warming:

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/reviewofbooks_ article/4357

Plus he agrees with me about peer review. It's rotten and not to be trusted.

Remember what else Gore said?
Why should we take Al Gore seriously on ANYTHING? Remember, this was the same man who said:

- That he and Tipper were the inspiration for "Love Story" (this was a surprise to everyone, including the author of "Love Story").

- That he was a co-sponsor of the Earned Income Tax Credit (the EITC was created in 1974, two years before Gore was elected to Congress).

- That his father was voted out of the Senate because he supported the Civil Rights Act (Al Gore, Sr., voted AGAINST the Civil Rights Act).

Gore told one whopper after another during his 2000 presidential campaign, and let's not forget his famous claim about the Internet.

I ask you again: why should we believe ANYTHING this liar says?

Dr. James E. Hansen
Was the "father" of 'global warming'. he was ALSO the one who predicted that we would be in an ICE AGE by 2000! As I said on another topic, these "scientists" can't even say that they were WRONG the first time and present some NEW data to support their theories. They will either ignore their errors or use the old claims when it supports their pet theories.
Go visit Hanson's site and ask him about the ICE AGE he predicted in the seventies:

http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/3a//www.columbia.edu/~jeh1

Glo-Bull warming
If the envirowackos and enviro-pols like Gore would quit spouting so much hot air there wouldn't be any global warming worth worrying about.

Come on!
Those folks at the Smithsonian were not real scientists and worked for Halliburton! At least that's the accusations against anyone who doesn't agree with GW theory.

Global Warming
How dense can the deniers be?

It was cold when I woke up this morning - the temperature increased until it was WARMER!

How much more proof do you need that the earth does warm?

This phenomenon has never before been seen on earth. Before 1900 the temperature of the earth had been constant! Never varied as much as a 1/1000 of a degree. There was never what one may call 'weather' before the internal combustion engine. (Yes I know that the first patent was in the late 1880's, but it was not in widespread use until the 1900's)

Argue that, you folks that deny that the planet changes temperatures!

King Liberal
By putting the word "liberal" in quote marks, does that mean that you are denying that the guy is left of center? We're talking here about Alexander Cockburn. If he's not on the left, then no one is.

Or maybe your belief in global warming is such that you think it now determines where someone is politically? If they believe, they're automatically on the left, and if they don't they're automatically on the right? Is that what you think?

Old exhibition probably
I suspect this exhibition would have been done about 1975-80; there was not so much a drop in global temperatures from about 1945 to 1975 as an evening out of a spike centered around 1940, complicated by the fact that people hadn't focused on the problem so much at that point and so the data were less reliable.

Too bad you didn't post the photos -- I bet they would have been a giveaway to the date of the exhibit.

For a graph of real data see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Instrumental_Temperature _Record.png

No sane scientist disputes the existence of a global warming trend. It's still scientifically respectable, though increasingly marginal, to dispute the importance of anthropogenic CO2, chiefly because world weather has been pretty flaky in recent geologic times.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.