Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, May 23, 2008
John Hawkins :: Townhall.com Columnist
We Need Reagan's Principles, Not His Agenda
by John Hawkins
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


"You cannot emulate any time in American history. You cannot try to premise your actions on Reagan. ‘He did this, so he'd do this.’ It's the fundamental principles that Reagan brought to the table that are applicable to our globalized generation and the challenges we face." -- House Republican Policy Committee Chairman, Thaddeus McCotter

Ronald Reagan was the greatest American President of the last 100 years, the second most important man of the 20th century behind Churchill, and one of the outstanding Presidents and world leaders of the modern era.

Why?

Reagan rebuilt our military, got our economy thriving again, re-energized the Republican Party, popularized conservative principles, was the one man most responsible for winning the Cold War, and conservatives always knew that he was one of us right down to his core.

That is why there was such an outpouring of grief when the Gipper died and why Ronald Reagan's name is still revered amongst conservatives -- and rightfully so.

That being said, many people in the conservative movement, because of our reverence for Reagan, have fallen into a trap, one that Reagan himself would have cautioned us to avoid.

That trap is coalescing around Reagan's agenda instead of Reagan's principles. That may seem to be a subtle point; however, it is a rather important distinction.

Principles are timeless. The free market almost always does a better job of handling things than big government. People are better able to spend their own money than the government is. As government power increases, the people's liberty retracts.

On the other hand, agendas can and often do change. We no longer need to try to defeat the Soviet Union. Restoring America's confidence in our military after the debacle in Vietnam isn't important any more. Defeating stagflation isn't exactly a hot topic either.

Reagan understood this instinctively. There were conservatives back in the thirties, but Reagan didn't run an election based on their issues. He had great respect for Barry Goldwater, the father of the modern conservative movement, but he didn't adopt Goldwater's agenda wholesale and if he had, he would have never become President of the United States.

That brings us to the dual problem we face with today's Republican Party.

The levers of power in today's GOP are in too many cases controlled by the same sort of wishy-washy Rockefeller Republicans who ran things before Reagan dragged the party to the Right. The party machinery goes all out to help squishes while often ignoring the needs of conservatives. It has also set up a primary system that makes it extremely difficult for conservatives to become the party’s presidential nominee -- and too often champions or at least turns a blind eye to issues like profligate spending and amnesty for illegal aliens that absolutely appall the conservatives who make up the heart of the Republican Party.

On the other side of the coin, because conservatives have become so disheartened by the performance of the Republican Party, we've become overly critical, de-motivated, and often reflexively demand a return to much of the agenda of the Reagan era. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News, Linkiest, and Viral Footage.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Redlac #9 - 2
We already have extensive, government-mandated cost-sharing in health care, and that's why it costs so much. It's not a "market" solution for government to "give" tax incentives to individuals so they can keep paying for health care on a heavily-regulated cost-sharing basis. A conservative approach would be to deregulate. But the GOP has already thrown in the towel on that. Republicans who don't see themselves as helpless without government increasingly have no party home.

Redlac #9 - 1
Excellent, and well said. The GOP's biggest problem today is that the things Hawkins proposes we get behind are not conservative concepts: they are premised on a role for government in encouraging individuals to save and spend in particular ways.

It's not a conservative approach to want to get in charge of the government so you can manage people's health care the way YOU think it should be managed. "Government-implemented 'market' solutions" are still government-implemented -- and therefore are, by definition, market distortions. Government intervention of ANY kind, whether regulation, tax, subsidy, or incentive, does one or both of only two things: cause prices to go up, and cause shortages.

The conservative approach would keep government small enough that the citizens are not working to pay for it nearly half of each year, and therefore have much greater discretion over their own incomes. The GOP's problem keeping a base lies in the fact that there is still a substantial number of Americans who have not bought into "strong government" or whatever Fred Barnes is calling it today. Statism inevitably gives us things like the Social Security system, into which I have been paying since 1977, and which will go broke when I am 82. Think how much more I could have arranged for my own retirement without the SSA -- and WITH the 18.4 cents a gallon I have been paying in federal gas taxes since I started driving; or the cost to me through all my consumer purchases, over the past 30 years, of increasing environmental and employment regulations; or, indeed, just the 28% or more of my income that has gone annually to the federal government.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.