Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, December 07, 2007
John Hawkins :: Townhall.com Columnist
14 Questions I'd Ask Hillary After I Hooked Her Up to a Lie Detector
by John Hawkins
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Few politicians in America have as much scandal, sleaze, and controversy surrounding them as Hillary Clinton and perhaps none of them, with the exception of her husband, has been given a bigger free pass.

As Peggy Noonanonce said, "People have pointed out (Hillary's) ethical lapses for so long that they seem boring, or impossible to believe. ‘That couldn't be true or she wouldn't be running for president.’ This thought collides with ‘And we already know all this anyway.’ Her campaign uses the latter to squash the latest: ‘old news,’ ‘cash for rehash.’

That is indeed how it works with Hillary Clinton's campaign, but nobody who is running for the presidency in the era of the blogosphere and YouTube should be allowed to skate on the controversial issues.

With that in mind, here are 14 yes or no questions I'd like to ask Hillary after I hooked her up to a polygraph machine, assuming that she hasn't gotten so good at lying that she could beat the machine.

A Culture Of Corruption

1) Your former friend and business partner, James McDougal, claimed that "he and a longtime businessman at McDougal's S&L, Henry Hamilton, 'developed a system to pass money to Clinton.' Did you or your husband ever take payoffs from your friend James McDougal?

2) While you were with the Rose Law Firm, you personally worked on a document that was used to "obfuscate and hide the fraudulent nature" of a piece of the Whitewater land swindle. Did you know that the document you were working on was going to be used for illegal purposes?

3) Your Rose Law Firm billing records were removed from Vince Foster's office after his death. Those records were "(m)issing and under subpoena for two years (and) they turned up in January 1996 in the Clintons' private quarters at the White House." Whoever took those records committed a crime by obstructing justice. Despite the fact that your records were taken and eventually turned up in your private quarters, you have denied taking the records or having anyone take them for you. Is that true?

4) Clinton supporter David Hale claimed that your husband pressured him into making a "fraudulent $300,000 federally backed loan to Susan McDougal, some of which went into Whitewater Development Corp." Did your husband pressure David Hale into making that fraudulent loan?

5) You once turned $1,000 into $100,000 in less than a year in the cattle futures market. The odds that this was done legitimately have been put, in some estimates, as high as 250 million to 1. It has been alleged, and seems likely, that the $100,000 was actually bribe money that was paid to you while the cattle futures market was merely used as cover for the payout. With that in mind, were your cattle futures winnings actually bribe money?

6) During the Clinton Administration, Craig Livingstone, the Director of the White House Office of Personnel Security, improperly looked through the FBI files of hundreds of your political enemies. There are allegations that you got Livingstone hired, that he went through those files on your orders, and that you also read some of those files. Are any of those allegations true?

7) In his report on the Travelgate firings, Independent Counsel Robert Ray said your testimony was "factually false," and said that he didn't go after you for perjury because there was "insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mrs. Clinton's statements to this Office or to Congress were knowingly false." Did you commit perjury in your testimony about Travelgate?

8) Your brother, Hugh Rodham, pocketed $400,000 (which was returned) from people who later received pardons from your husband. At the time, you claimed that you had not discussed those pardons with your brother or your husband beforehand. Is that true?

9) You have been tied to a surprising number of shady fundraisers including Peter Paul, Norman Hsu, John Huang, Johnny Chung, and Charlie Trie just to name a few. Were you ever aware that any of these men were engaged in illegal activities that benefited you and your husband before it was brought to your attention by law enforcement authorities or the press?

No Wonder She Kissed Arafat's Wife

10) Former Clinton consultant Dick Morris said that in a dispute over money, you said to him, "That's all you people care about is money." He took that to be a slap at him because he is a Jew. Did you say that to Dick Morris?

11) Former Clinton adviser, Paul Fray, claims that you called him a "Jew B*stard" after Bill lost his congressional bid in 1974. Is that true?

12) Larry Patterson, an Arkansas state trooper who also acted as your bodyguard says that he heard you, "use the term 'Jew B*stard' and call (your) husband a 'Jew Boy' and a 'M-----rF--king Jew.'" Is that true?

Are You "Experienced?"

13) You've been portrayed as an extremely talented lawyer, but isn't it true that you flunked your D.C. Bar Exam, that James McDougal said that he only hired you as a lawyer "because Bill came in whimpering (that) they needed help," and that you only were able to become a partner at the Rose Law Firm because your husband was the Governor of Arkansas?

14) According to Newsweek's Jonathan Alter, who's certainly no conservative, "Hillary negotiated nothing and was present at no major meetings on foreign policy and national security after 1994. ...On domestic policy, Hillary was essentially sidelined after her disastrous 1994 health-care plan." Is that true?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News, Linkiest, and Viral Footage.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
ROTFLMAO!
Mr. Hawkins, think pay- per- view!

Good questions...
And we all know the answers! Which is why she'd never agree to any kind of lie detector test.

That was good!
You might want to run these questions by the TH legal department so they can be fine tuned such that Hillary cannot weasel out of the true answer due to a legal technicality in the wording of the question. I mean, who knows what the definition of "is" is? Right?


Excellent Article
I can just imagine the sheer terror that would grip Hellary & her Clintonista Machine at the mere thought of the actual truth getting out..

This is a Keeper worth printing..
How is it that this Broad isn't doing time in prison?

sass...
She is able to convince us that any questions about what she has done is "old news" and not worth digging up again. Could you imagine a murderer trying to convince us that the murder from 20 years ago should be ignored because it happened in the past (but wait, isn't that possible with this woman!?)

Colosteve
What do you mean, "She is able to convince us...". She hasn't fooled most of the TH posters.

Hawkins list of questions should be put before her, even without a lie detector. To even imagine this woman would agree to a lie detector is sheer fantasy, as Hawkins knows.

Hillary will not be able to respond to these questions and convince the audience that she consistently tells the truth.

We would be "treated" to more of her wishy-washy answer regarding driver's licenses for illegal aliens in New York.

15
Most women would have divorced a chronic philanderer like Bubba after the first few side-dishes he helped himself to. Is the reason you stay hitched to Slick Willy solely because he is a necessary evil to advance your power mongering agendas?

http://klintons.com

More please
Can you come up with custom lists for every candidate in time for the primaries?

With all the criminal tit for tat going on, is there anyone that can be trusted?

When both Left and Right are so far Right of center that you can't tell the difference any more, how the hell is one supposed to make an informed decision?

Freakin Hysterical...
But you forgot one.

Did you have Vince Foster wacked?

Hillary would pass
As I understand it, lying causes certain physiological responses that are detected by lie detectors. Hillary is so cold, she would likely be able to repress any such responses and pass the test. How else do you suppose she is able to lie so convincingly? This would make her no less wrong, just prove once again her utter deviousness.

What's the matter, Robert?
"RockyJones", aka, "Robert", or as I call him, "Fraud Robert" ("Frobusto" for short) - is back!

How come you didn't sign your name?

I guess the Townhall moderator hasn't blocked your other IP address... yet.

Poor Frobusto.

And one more question
Were you gay before you married Bill?

Hillary Free Falling
Is it over for Hilllary?

Clinton lead narrows in New Hampshire: poll

Yahoo-Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton’s lead over rival Barack Obama in New Hampshire has narrowed to single digits a month before the state’s primary election, said a poll released on Wednesday

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/free-falling



Oh, Please!
Just crawling out a cave? These questions have been asked so many times that only an idiot would ask them again.
If the same format for detecting,"scandal, sleaze, and controversy" were applied to the current president, it would take a few hundred thousand more questions then the regurgitated 14 you can come up for the next president of the USA.

This Board
The words and phrases used by the posters on this board are indicators of how we citizens have bought into the Hillary persona developed by the MSM. There is a finality about how we have acquiesced to her wrong doing--we have accepted never knowing the truth. Think about that--we accept a person who may become the President of our nation with a taint that disgusts us all but fails to make her repugnant to us. Hillary's disdain for the Law of the Land and her continual obfuscation of the truth should be reconciled long before any citizen errs and casts one vote out of uncertainty or self inflicted stupidity. I know enough but many want to believe the unbelievable.

The Hillary fall from grace
As time goes on the more she says the more her support will fade. Some years ago the news media made a big deal about the first professional baseball umpire who was a woman. She only lasted a few game in the big time and ran from the field crying. Now there were plenty of women who would have made very good professional umpires, but this lady was the wrong one. Hillary is the wrong woman at the right time. No warm and fuzzy feeling, ole hippy, socialist, prower hunger, morals of a ground hog, and enought baggage to sink a battleship. Even Oprah the queen of tears, is against her, Our country must have strong conservative leadership to survive, protect the family, move back to the constitution, lower taxes, strong military, shut down the border, address the illegals issue (something GW has refused to do) restore our image in the world, put the middle class back to work, establish an energy policy that makes sense, and unite the country. Hillary would do none of these.

We need a plant
Play the game the way the Clintons would and place a few plants at the next (D) debate and ask these questions to her face and watch her squirm like a worm or screech like an owl.

This woman is a joke. President of the United States? I think not.

Have hope!
These questions (and others) are responsible for her huge negatives in the polls. I dream of a skillful Republican candidate in a straight-up, old-fashioned debate with Hillary. Hope springs eternal...

Crumbs:
"If the same format for detecting,"scandal, sleaze, and controversy" were applied to the current president, it would take a few hundred thousand more questions then the regurgitated 14 you can come up for the next president of the USA."

You wish! Let go of your BDS! It will make you free!

crumbsrmine
If you want to discuss the subject of the column, please do. It is not idiotic to ask pertinent and unanswered questions of a pol seeking election. There is no statute of limitations on behavior, and some short memory folks benefit from being reminded of prior actions. Rudy's record of character lapses and left-wing decisions taints him as a candidate in my eyes, and the lapse of time does little to make him look better.
As for the current president, the usual left wing argument of "you guys do it worse" is irrelevant. If you want to bring up Bush, find a column where he is the subject and discuss his performance.

Let's not start jumping on her
past rfecord too soon. If we do it will truely be old hat by the time the primaries are over.

We want her to win the Lamocrat race.

If Hillary doesn't win ..
I'll be surprised. Who's for her?
Gays, single females, single females with children, blacks and hispanics, muslims, peculiarly enough, Jews. Then there are the wealthy who know full well that taxes are transferable to the consumer and part of the cost of doing business to obtain expanded government handouts.
Free is for me is always a winning campaign slogan for a people whose idea of nobility is shaped by television.

Mr. Right: Yes, HELLary would pass.

As a pathological liar (probably among other things) she probably believes what she says.

Pretty scary, huh?



ANYONE BUT HILLARY !
Ok you guys, we can post here all day long but until we get out on a grassroots basis and start making sure that ALL conservatives get out and vote we are going to be looking at Pres Clinton. The sheer thought gives me anxiety attacks! PLEASE get involved....and make sure you do you part to defeat this scary and total unethical woman. She will stop at nothing to be president.

I will be silent no longer...

Mr. Hawkins
have you purchased your body armor yet. I think your kneecaps may be in danger after your list of questions. If you need a body guard or two, just give a shout out!

Resume:
Retired Marine SSgt.

crumbsrmine asked
but not answered truthfully. I'd as two more questions. What was discussed when you and Bill went to Russia, China

hagar
you forget my friend. Yes or No answers. I will assist you.

Were you bought and paid for by the Chinese?

Woe is us!!
When voting for the POTUS we should be looking at the credentials they present. Hillary has none and the rest of the Dims field is pretty slim. On the other hand, the Repubs have pretty slim pickings too.
One of the problems in this country is WHY some of us vote for candidates. He/she is: Catholic,(the reason my daddy voted for Kennedy), a Mason; black, white, hispanic, a woman; belongs to the correct organizations; will "put a chicken in every pot"; is pro-life; is pro-choice (which I always found to be a misnomer, it's pro-choice if you only choose abortion!); is Baptist (the reason some in my Sunday School class voted for Carter, "he'll do away with drinking in the White House"!); and a million other reasons that in themselves are fine for the individual voting but should not be the only criteria used to vote for any candidate.
Slick certainly describes Hillary as well as her hubby - wonder who was blessed with it first?! The women of this country who vote for Hillary because "it's time for a woman to be President", and for no other reason, deserve what they may eventually get - Hitler in a skirt!!

I see
I see the poor machine with all its bells and whistles going off so much that it would just burst into flames! And that’s BEFORE they hook her up to it!

Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
Hunter/Tancredo 2008!
http://www.gohunter08.com
http://www.ontheissues.org/Duncan_Hunter.htm
Hunter’s best quote: Move away from the Ted Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. (Jun 2007)
To libs there is no lie, it is expedient exaggeration!

Excellent questions but...
Expect only extremely obfuscated answers--as Shilary's definitions of "yes" and "no" are more blurred than the comparable ones of my left-coast-dwelling ultra-ultra-nominal-Hindu sister.

I see
I see some great questions on here, maybe you should let us ask the questions! Another 5 stars, thanks for the laughs John!
Billary: Sandy, the papers need to get lost!
Sandy: Don’t worry, I have the perfect place for them and with all the stank down there, no one would dare go looking for them!

Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
Hunter/Tancredo 2008!
http://www.gohunter08.com
http://www.ontheissues.org/Duncan_Hunter.htm
Hunter’s best quote: Move away from the Ted Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. (Jun 2007)
To libs there is no lie, it is expedient exaggeration!

14 questions for hildebeast
Congrats on an outstanding expose on a tiny portion of Hillary's criminal activity. Do you think we have any chance of someone actually asking HERSELF those questions? Keep up the good honest work Mr JOHN HAWKINS

Answers:
1) "There is no evidence of that."

2) "There is no evidence of that."

3) "There is no evidence of that."

4) "There is no evidence of that."

5) "There is no evidence of that."

6) "There is no evidence of that."

7) "There is no evidence of that."

8) "There is no evidence of that."

9) "There is no evidence of that."

10) "There is no evidence of that."

11) "There is no evidence of that."

12) "There is no evidence of that."

13) "There is no evidence of that."

14) "There is no evidence of that."

crumbs
Congrats! You answered an argument with an ad hominem attack. I know that gets a lot of shout outs when you do it at Daily Kos, but here all it does is destroy any shreds of credibility you might have had.

Where are your 14 questions for GWB? No? Didn't think so. It's so much easier to just lash out without thinking first.

Future question
Even though you have answered all of these questions and it is clear you should be in jail the American people overwhelmingly voted for you and now you are the President of the United States, have you stopped laughing yet?

Follow up: Exactly how stupid are the American people for voting for you?

I say screw the lie detector.
There would never be a better use for the waterboard, answers or no. Let her become the socialist candidate first.

To the libs
who say that you could ask these same questions of Bush, write your own blog on Townhall and ask away! And watch how badly savaged by fact you will be. Remember, your buddy Dan Rather got cut loose because he also let his derangement get in the way of his job. If you vote for Hillary, you are voting for corruption as you can see above. If that doesn't matter, may you enjoy your Bill of Rights while it lasts; she is Hugo Chavez in a skirt.

Subjective whining
Dontcha just love these neocon chickenhearts when it comes to "getting the truth" from opponents? They are quick to talk of lie detectors, torture methods and in the case of some of the worst (which is mainstream here in Townhall land, I might add) put 'poison in their creme brulee' and just be done with them.

Of course, none of these extreme tactics ever seem to apply to your own flawed candidates or GOPers, now do they? Rudy can lie with near impunity - why, the reaction to his worst character flaws is deflection, as opposed to closer scrutiny of his lawlessness and giving him the bum's rush out the door.

And here's a question Huck would be asked by an ever-indignant, {but oh-so-selectively-partisan} O'Reilly - if he were on the Dem ticket of course:

Why DID Huckabee work to bring about parole for a known rapist who went on to kill two women after his release?
http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?Article ID=154e1aad-fd18-4efd-8d80-b5dab8559419

sedonaman
or...

1. Sorry, I don't recall.
2. Sorry, I don't recall.
3. Sorry, I don't recall. ect, ect, ect...

Doc
Your description of Hillary hooked to a lie detector reminds me of that scene in Barbarella where Hanoi Jane gets hooked to the sex machine. It self-destructs because it couldn't keep up with her. Any decent lie detector hooked to the Countess of Countless Lies would do the same.

Oh for the love of God
But then again, as Crumb noted, these questions HAVE been asked of the Clintons--- to the tune of millions of taxpayer's dollars and all by Ken Starr in the 90's. For all that money - infused by no less than the King Hypocrite, Mellon Scaife (of his own personal scandal fame) - they found NOTHING. NOT ONE THING to hang on Hillary.

So what does Hawkins propose when all the money in the world doesn't change the truth? Lie detectors for a start, and then onward, one would presume to the, surefire regions of torture where he can use pain to extract the "truth" -- "truth" being on his terms of course. Or, just elect even more GOPers who will lie in the "right" way.

Conservatives believe in lie detectors
because liberals don't believe in the truth. And we are not the party who is afraid of getting the truth from terrorists; you are. Why are you opposed to wire-tapping of your foreign telephone calls? Because it gets in the way of your sedition is why. They can tap away on mine!!!

I believe that Nancy Pelousy should be tried for her violation of US law in meeting with Bashar Assad. Too bad that GWB believes that the Presidency is above politics. Nancy, Dianne Feinstein, Bill and Hillary would all be in horizontal stripes breaking rocks instead of being feted by the George Soros wing of the SocComm party.

Frobusto
I've been a TH'er far longer than you, my little libsquirt friend - and familiar with your "Rocket J. Squirrel" nom de guerre.

And I'm quite certain you haven't experienced any log-in problems with your other "handle", just as you say.

We all know you are as honest as - ummm - Hillary!

Robert
Robert, maybe you want to get as many new IDS as you can.
Reason 1> 27 friends of the Clintons are now dead from all sorts of means?????????????
2.> 28 to 35 had info about IVES/HENERY CASE
3,> 36 to 47 were all bodyguards to the Clintons. It seems your life span goes way down with the more you become close to them and there circle of crooks, thiefs,& POLITACAL STEAMROLLER. Hope you learn to know your emeney before you bed with them. US NAVY NAM/VET/DISABLED.

Talisman
Do you personally believe Hillary to be honest and truthful? Yes or no. Equivocation will reveal your true thoughts on the subject, so answer as you will. Hillary is the most dishonest Presidential candidate I've ever encountered. Moonbat Jimmy Carter still wins the prize for incompetency, of course. Whereas, all politicians shade things to a degree, Hillary, Soulless Queen of the Democratic Party, is dishonest to her very core.

Primus54
May be it's just me, but when my hubby and other active duty go "out in the field" they aren't allowed to take their pc labtops with them. Any laptop they use is gov't issue, and they aren't allowed to post at sites such as TH. Am I wrong?

talisman: Really?
Really? Thank you for the ad hominem attack. That's why TH needs "enlightened" leftists like you to point out the error of our ways. Your backdoor defense of female-chauvinists like Ms Clinton apparently grants you some esoteric insight into the nature of national politics. Being a service academy-educated senior reserve officer whose butt has actually "BEEN ON THE BEACH" apparently exempts me from your "chickenheart" label.

That being said, I’ve got additional questions for Ms. Clinton:
+ How does your unqualified support of the barbaric practice of “partial birth abortion” square with your Methodist faith?
+ Why do you hate minimally-franchised heterosexual white males so much since you advocate policies that discriminate against and are out right detrimental to the lives of said demographic group?

What exactly has Rudy lied about? Please provide examples.

Hiillary(ous) Answers
1. No, they were gifts.
2.If I did it it can't be illegal.
3. Yes. The tooth fairy left them under my pillow.
4. I didn't know what that f**kinf a**Hole did.
5. It was an advance for the upcoming infomercial campaign for the HRC get rich quick scam, I mean plan.
6. Why yes. If J Edgar Hoover did it it must be legal.
7.You can't prove it.
8.I beg your pardon, I never looked in any of those envelopes.
9. All of the money was legal tender and giving to me is not only legal it's an immoral imperative.
11. Not Jew, I said "you".
12.I never called Bill a Jew, beyond that, no comment.
13. So what, a lot of kids flunk third grade and become successful drug dealers. Besides, the dope owed me a favor.
14. I had more important things to do like protecting Chelsea's virginity and screening applicants for White House intern positions.

Hiillary(ous) Answers
1. No, they were gifts.
2.If I did it it can't be illegal.
3. Yes. The tooth fairy left them under my pillow.
4. I didn't know what that f**kinf a**Hole did.
5. It was an advance for the upcoming infomercial campaign for the HRC get rich quick scam, I mean plan.
6. Why yes. If J Edgar Hoover did it it must be legal.
7.You can't prove it.
8.I beg your pardon, I never looked in any of those envelopes.
9. All of the money was legal tender and giving to me is not only legal it's an immoral imperative.
11. Not Jew, I said "you".
12.I never called Bill a Jew, beyond that, no comment.
13. So what, a lot of kids flunk third grade and become successful drug dealers. Besides, the dope owed me a favor.
14. I had more important things to do like protecting Chelsea's virginity and screening applicants for White House intern positions.

Sedonaman ...
Surely you jest? There has to be at least a few, "I can't recall"'s in there somewhere.

more questions for her highness
I'd have many more questions. I'm sure the many deaths [list too long to go into] during Slick Will's reign were her doing.

And one more: Why do you really want to be President? is it because you didn't steal all the White House furniture yet?

Sorry that one still irks me.

KTb.

oops...
I should have refreshed after reading the posts before posting. reannthem beat me to it.

King Liberal: Spare ME
This concludes another test of the feminist double-standard alert system. The double standard seems to be functioning normally: (a) If a woman ends a marriage she is merely exiting an oppressive environment (b) If man ends a marriage he is a failure because he didn’t make a sufficiently Herculean effort to save the marriage. Reality: women are the biggest abusers of “no fault divorces” (NFDs), i.e. 70% of all divorces are filed by women. Why? Women trial lawyers invented NFD. Gender feminists have taught women-children how to use a paternal legal system & children (= financial assets) to turn their ex-husbands into peons in perpetuity. Why exit a marriage IOT find one’s self without having an ex-husband to pay all of the bills?

Sham marriages? Jennifer Flowers (Clinton ex-mistress) stated in public that Bill told her that Hillary had been with more women than Bill himself. Surprise, Surprise, surprise!!!! WRT Rudy’s previous wives: Wife number one apparently couldn’t have children. Do you know how many military wives have divorced their amputee husbands after their return from Iraq? Additionally, I hate to point out to the female-chauvinists that women have a capacity for directing emotional/verbal abuse at their spouses, e.g., Rudy’s wife #2: God knows I would want to stay married to a rabid female-chauvinist who took an active role in an off-Broadway production of the misandrist “Vagina Monologues.” Obviously she wasn’t contributing to Rudy’s

King Liberal: Spare ME
This concludes another test of the feminist double-standard alert system. The double standard seems to be functioning normally: (a) If a woman ends a marriage she is merely exiting an oppressive environment (b) If man ends a marriage he is a failure because he didn’t make a sufficiently Herculean effort to save the marriage. Reality: women are the biggest abusers of “no fault divorces” (NFDs), i.e. 70% of all divorces are filed by women. Why? Women trial lawyers invented NFD. Gender feminists have taught women-children how to use a paternal legal system & children (= financial assets) to turn their ex-husbands into peons in perpetuity. Why exit a marriage IOT find one’s self without having an ex-husband to pay all of the bills?

Sham marriages? Jennifer Flowers (Clinton ex-mistress) stated in public that Bill told her that Hillary had been with more women than Bill himself. Surprise, Surprise, surprise!!!! WRT Rudy’s previous wives: Wife number one apparently couldn’t have children. Do you know how many military wives have divorced their amputee husbands after their return from Iraq? Additionally, I hate to point out to the female-chauvinists that women have a capacity for directing emotional/verbal abuse at their spouses, e.g., Rudy’s wife #2: God knows I would want to stay married to a rabid female-chauvinist who took an active role in an off-Broadway production of the misandrist “Vagina Monologues.” Obviously she wasn’t contributing to Rudy’s

KL: Correction/addition.
Obviously she wasn’t contributing to Rudy’s “emotional needs.”

King scribbles:
Meanwhile Rudy is free to have destroyed his family, run around with a misstress on the taxpayers dime and you people seemed to be 100% fine with that as he was you front runner for most of this year.

That statement is pure BS! I see all kinds of people who state they do not like the way he did this, and they also state they will NOT vote for this RINO=lib in repub clothing! I just posted this on Kathleen Parkers love fest piece on mittary:
I do NOT care what religion you claim to be or practice, I do not want any part of any RINO! I want someone who will close off our borders and secure this country FIRST! And I do not believe for one second that includes either Mittary or rudary!

Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
Hunter/Tancredo 2008!
http://www.gohunter08.com
http://www.ontheissues.org/Duncan_Hunter.htm
Hunter’s best quote: Move away from the Ted Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. (Jun 2007)
To libs there is no lie, it is expedient exaggeration!

KL: Correction/Addition
Obviously she wasn’t contributing to Rudy’s “emotional needs.”

King Lib
writes:

"With so many moralists running around you would think you would applaud a woman who stuck by her man and preserved the sancticty of her family but no, you just continue to bash saying she's stayed obviously for power. Whatever."

Question:

YOUR KIDDING, RIGHT?
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

King liberals stupid math ...
Conservative=Christian
Christian=Conservative

Dude, when you come down from LSD high (Liberal Socialist Delusions), maybe you might learn some truth. While I am a conservative Christian, many, and I mean MANY, of the conservative posters here on TH are eith agnostic or atheist.

So, while many here will chastise Hillary for making like Tammy Wynette andstanding by her man, there are just as many of us who laude her for doing so. Of course, being a public figure, knowing her motivation for doing so is a valid topic for discussion.

Not that you'd care or that I'll be able to help you understand, just though I'd try.

MOVE ON already
My goodness!! Haven't we had enough of all this Clinton stuff??

Let's just hope they don't get re-elected in '08 and we have to endure their dangerous administration again for another term.

Gotta admit... Hawkins' title all by itself made me laugh before I even read the questions...

Hillary is already hooked to
a permanent lie detector just below her nose.

It's her lips. If they are moving the lies are spewing.

king liberal
You raised some very good points. I myself cannot understand how people can find fault with Mrs. Clinton for failing to dump her husband. Not to mention that it's none of anyone's business anyway.
I say stick to the issues. I can't vote for her because:
a) We can't afford her million ideas
b) I don't believe she would be a good Commander in Cheif
c) I don't believe she would be an able negotiator on the world stage, and
d) I don't like the fact that what she says depends on who she's addressing.

So, I don't need the silly lie detector test. I already ruled her out.

Hillary...
Would rather be wired to the electric chair than to a lie detector.

TALIAS
With all those tax money spent, I dont remember hillo being impeached. Was she ever put in front of the Congress for her lies? She just lies when she opens her mouth, so no one can tell the difference.
Then she comes out with her plan for the subprime mess, her spoke person was a advisor from berkley, hillo has no plan, & if she did, it would be a certain failure. Just the truth, that the left cant seem to get a grip on. The NIE's report is just as I would expect from the same people that got the blame for droping the ball on the 9/11 intel.
If you believe a word that comes from hillos mouth, or her cronies, you have been had. just like the old saying, there is a sucker born every day, & there is a bunch out there.

One more question Hilary
Is it true that if you aren't elected pres.you are going to divorce Bill?

Here's my question:
Funny how the very first comment (from KING LIBERAL: “re-hash. Nothing new here.”) perfectly illustrates Hawkins’ point that Hillary, after never answering these questions in a public forum, gets a pass because it’s “old news.” Doesn’t “old news” usually imply that the truth is known?

Here’s the question I would ask: “Do you believe that your husband sexually assaulted Juanita Broderick?”

Supposedly, women from all walks of life and all parties are united in supporting Hillary because, as a woman, she will best understand the issues facing women. So it’s funny that neither the press nor women’s rights groups demand an answer to that question. With the help of the Left I think we’re seeing one of the greatest ironies of our time: the “women’s candidate” married to a rapist.

Vic
writes:
"Hillary is already hooked to
a permanent lie detector just below her nose.

It's her lips. If they are moving the lies are spewing"

LMFAO!!!

KingLib
I'm well thanks. Hope all is well with you also. I just can't figure you out though. One day you seem to have so much hope, and the next, you sound like t r. Sorry, I'm not trying to insult you by the comparison. And I do wish you well.

more
15. Are you a lesbian or bi-sexual?

New Acronym Alert - BINO
Question for Shrillary: Are you a BINO (B**tch In Name Only), or Are you the REAL thing?

Hiillary(ous) Answers
1. No, they were gifts.
2.If I did it it can't be illegal.
3. Yes. The tooth fairy left them under my pillow.
4. I didn't know what that f**kinf a**Hole did.
5. It was an advance for the upcoming infomercial campaign for the HRC get rich quick scam, I mean plan.
6. Why yes. If J Edgar Hoover did it it must be legal.
7.You can't prove it.
8.I beg your pardon, I never looked in any of those envelopes.
9. All of the money was legal tender and giving to me is not only legal it's an immoral imperative.
11. Not Jew, I said "you".
12.I never called Bill a Jew, beyond that, no comment.
13. So what, a lot of kids flunk third grade and become successful drug dealers. Besides, the dope owed me a favor.
14. I had more important things to do like protecting Chelsea's virginity and screening applicants for White House intern positions.

Mr. D...
Loved your comment at 10:14 am.

RE: talisman
"they found NOTHING. NOT ONE THING to hang on Hillary."

Incorrect, you monumental history revisionist. Google "Rose Law Firm billing documents". There you will see IRON CLAD PROOF that Hillary Clinton was, IN FACT, one of the masterminds behind the theft of MILLIONS of dollars from THOUSANDS of poor and elderly people through illegal real estate and loan practices.

The reason why she was let off the hook was NOT that there was no evidence, but instead because of the technicality that she successfully obstructed justice until the statute of limitations expired.

But you probably knew this. The FACT of the matter is that Democrats DON'T CARE ONE BIT that they are voting for crooks. Democrats LOVE crooks, and the proof is in the FACT that felons, were they not prohibited from voting in most areas, would vote OVERWHELMINGLY Democratic. Some surveys put it as high as ***90%*** of murderers, rapist, and child molestors would vote Democrat were they able to. Here you can see a report by a pair of Democratic operatives in the American Sociological Association who are lobying to reenfranchise felons on the basis that it would mean more elected Democrats: http://www.asanet.org/cs/felon_vote

Relax and enjoy the implosion, but
let's not get ahead of ourselves. Remember that we WANT Hillary to be the nominee. Any Repub can beat her in the general election AND the libs know it.

Savor the moments, they don't last forever!

Tim Russert
Tim, you know I don't answer hypotheticals.

This isn't a hypothetical. This is real.

Tim, it is a hypothetical, I said it was.


King Liberal
What debate? Unless you can prove to me he will not close the border and secure this country, to me there is nothing up for debate! As I have stated before, there are two kinds of politicians!
1-the ones who have been caught!
2-the ones who have not yet been caught!
sad fact of life, but there it is.

Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
Hunter/Tancredo 2008!
http://www.gohunter08.com
http://www.ontheissues.org/Duncan_Hunter.htm
Hunter’s best quote: Move away from the Ted Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. (Jun 2007)
To libs there is no lie, it is expedient exaggeration!

four starrs for the column.
Wow those are some serious questions of illegal behavior. It looks like some kind of indepenent council should be given subpoena power to look into them. Oh wait we already did that. Didn't turn out so well. Oh well when investigations by political partisans fail, that is what rhetorical accusations or for.

Maybe, maybe not
I think the test should be a truth detector, not a lie detector -- calling it a lie detector seems biased and tarnishes her presumption of innocence. On second thought, maybe we should give Hillary a maybe-maybe not detector test, as I believe she has patent rights on that method.

Free Ramos and Compean
Put Johnny Sutton on trial
Global warming is sphere nonsense

Miserable Liberal Doggpile
Townhall is a "conservative" website with "conservative" columnists.

Conservative writers and readers like to write and read about stoopid liberal-socialists.

It's what we do.

Surprised it has taken so long for you to grasp this - but there it is.

I hope your confusion has been cleared up.

King Liberal
Your too funny, man. How bout we do this! Lets start with the border. Lets support someone who will close it, and take it from there. That is probably to me, anyway, the most important issue right now. And Bi-polar is not so bad if your a decent person. And you seem to be. So lets brawl, toss back a couple of cold ones, fire up the stogies and solve other issues as they come up.

Clinton Derangement Syndrome
As made abundantly clear in the Huckabee caving into mad dog RWers, in the Arkansas rape case, there is way to much hatred, unbelievable spiteful grotesque hatred of the Clintons that most of the stuff about them is just baloney. Nothing these nuts spout can be believed.

http://minx.cc/?post=248466

Hillary
This is only the tip of the iceberg. Nothing compared to what we will see if she is elected. Nothing compared to what was uncovered just during the Vince Foster cover-up. Indeed, if she's elected, she will most certainly be, the last freely elected President this country will ever see. This site's got it right (www.ahabandjezebel.com).


King Liberal
When Republicans "storm the castle?" We have class. Remember the College Republicans - young men in khakis and blazers and young ladies in pearls and heels - who were physically attacked at San Francisco State University this past year? Remember the pictures of the freaks attacking those fine young people who were merely passing out Republican brochures? We don't act like liberal barbarians who, lacking ideas, physically attack conservatives and Republicans on college campuses. Liberal freaks act like animals and "storm castles" because they are incapable of engaging in rational discourse. Ask David Horowitz and other conservatives whose castles have been "stormed" by ridiculous, loudmouth, obnoxious, disgusting, repulsive liberal freaks.

"I don't remember."
My brain's in the blender.
It's jello!

Also, this: http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=85000645


Taft writes:
"Nothing these nuts spout can be believed..."

Assume you mean the Clintons - and you are correct!

Taft scribbles:
Nothing these nuts spout can be believed.

That ok, we don't mind if your kind post here! In fact its kinds fun!

Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
Hunter/Tancredo 2008!
http://www.gohunter08.com
http://www.ontheissues.org/Duncan_Hunter.htm
Hunter’s best quote: Move away from the Ted Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. (Jun 2007)
To libs there is no lie, it is expedient exaggeration!

Coat of arms
Military Lovin' Puppy, "vindictive and irrational"? Isn't that on the Clinton coat of arms somewhere? Oh, that's right, when conservatives push for the truth they are vindictive, irrational hate-mongers. Truth is: the truth is never vindictive or "old news".

Free Ramos and Compean.
Darwin was a monkey's uncle. ... no, monkey was a Darwin's uncle.

Primus54
What do you do with a pressure group that convinces Huckabee, against a mountain of evidence, to release a rapist, just because he raped a cousin of Clinton's? The guy got out and raped and killed two more women!

Taft
are you related to t r ? It sounds like you are twins!

Tampa Dave
Very well observed, and very well said!

Taft
Make them governor of Massachusetts and the Dem nominee for president?

SSGT
WHERE THE H3LL HAVE YOU BEEN??

Good morning, by the way....

I hate to disagree, but Taft is far more eloquent that that sorry excuse for humanity, t r.

SSGT
I'm just saying, if you look into what happened down there in Arkansas, you would see what blind hate they have, and that they would stoop to any low to get at a Clinton.

Folks!!
Don't bother with what King Ding writes because he only does it to AMUSE himself into believing he is intelligent and a SATIRIST!!!!!

Taft
or maybe its because the scum lie about anything that comes out of their collective pie-holes. Maybe thats the reason.

YLH
"YO" sister!
How the heck are ya? Hope hubby is feeling better today. Pass it on, will ya?
We are having a fricken tropical heat wave up here. Its gonna be 30* today. WOW.

sedonaman has it almost right
If her Whitewater testimony is any indicator, her answer to all 14 questions would be "I don't remember."

BTW - I notice how none of the libs can even begin to defned this woman's deplorable record. So instead we get the same old crap: 'she's going to win anyway' (no, she's not) and 'the other politicians are just as bad' (no, they're not).

SSGT
Lucky you!

Hubby's better, but now I'm sick, AND have a sick child at home. The worst part is, I lost my voice, so I can only yell by typing:

AAAAAARRRGH!!!!!

Robert
You get an FU!

Vic-Doc-Anne-Ssgt-YLG
Like GunnyG says, “They don’t start shooting unless you are near the target!’

I give you Tailspin and Crumbs4Brains!

dogg
Ignore republican taint?
With posters like you to keep us updated??
We Republicans do a stellar job of policing our own, to include ejecting anyone found to be implicated in a crime, major or minor; unlike democrats who elevate them to higher office to prevent scrutiny and prosecution.
If bil and hil hadn't won in '96 they would be in prison for life.

YLG
my most humble apologies (YLH). What the heck was I thinking. ummm, wellllll, OH, my fingers are frozen from being outside in the extremely brittle cold here. Yeh, thats it!

Georgetwin
I'm a perfect 10 for 10 at 500 yards. Is that close enough?

Georgetwin
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Love those monikers! They are so apt!!

YLG writes:
SSGT
WHERE THE H3LL HAVE YOU BEEN??

Good morning, by the way....

I hate to disagree, but Taft is far more eloquent that that sorry excuse for humanity, t r.

Please don't insult the sorry excuses for humanity by comparing them to t_r or Massively Loopy Dip for that matter.

To Rockhead J. Squirrel: Why must you constantly lie about your "experience?"

Airgun
"We Republicans do a stellar job of policing our own, to include ejecting anyone found to be implicated in a crime, major or minor; unlike democrats who elevate them to higher office to prevent scrutiny and prosecution."

Recall the Mark Folley scandal?

"The scandal provoked widespread criticism of Republican leaders for their response to earlier WARNINGS and inconsistencies in their statements. In particular, many called for Hastert to resign, including some conservative voices such as the editorial page of The Washington Times.[39]"

SSGT
You can miss-spell my moniker ANYTIME!

Fingers frozen....? Suuuuure....

Lumberjack7392
Howdy!
I stand corrected and will dip my (frozen) fingers into boiling cholesterol free oil!

Lumberjack7392
You are correct: that was below the belt.

Hellery
What a complete puke and the clown she is married to is just the right political pig to clean up after her

Taft writes:
Airgun
"We Republicans do a stellar job of policing our own, to include ejecting anyone found to be implicated in a crime, major or minor; unlike democrats who elevate them to higher office to prevent scrutiny and prosecution."

Recall the Mark Folley scandal?

"The scandal provoked widespread criticism of Republican leaders for their response to earlier WARNINGS and inconsistencies in their statements. In particular, many called for Hastert to resign, including some conservative voices such as the editorial page of The Washington Times.[39]"

Maybe so, but Mark Foley was ultimately removed from office by the voters, unlike Dumbbuttcraps who get caught up in scandals. They just keep getting re-elected, ex. Teddy Kennedy, Barney Frank, and Gerry Studds.

Bear
Would you name something that differentiates Hillery from Guiliani, I mean of real political substance?

thank you, lumberjack
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Can't wait to finish "Blacklisted by History".
I'm composing a list of current commies to try to scrape off my government like crap on my shoes.
Revisionist historian- your days are numbered, your tenure will be revoked, your name will no longer be Legion, it'll be Mud.

Thing Lib
Yes.

King Liberal writes:
If a Democrat or a liberal is caught "being gay" or whatever its not a big thing as the liberal platform embraces homosexuals.

Your average religious conservative does not embrace homosexuality and you know it. So on your side of the coin its a much bigger deal.

Do you want Larry Craig to resign?

let's review. Studds travels out of state and nails a Senate Page. Frank's lover runs a male prostitution ring out of Frank's Washington house, and that's ok with you.
BTW, whoever said I was a religious conservative?
Yes, I want Craig to resign.

SSGT
As to the posts on the column, I wouldn't ask Mrs. Clinton any questions. I would probably "spill" my coffee accidentally while walking by the socket where the lie detector was plugged. It wouldn't be enough to eradicate her, but it would be enough to re-align her synapses!!

Airgun
When I read history I never pick it up if I know..

1. The guy writing it, like Stanton, are very biased, and have an agenda.
2. If they have no credibility. What training or competence have they had/shown.

In other words, Stanton Evans would be better off doing dishes at McDonalds.



I am glad
I am happy to see Serge reviving the insane far left concept that both Dems and Reps are "too far right". amuses me almost as much as the far-far leftists who say the MSM has a right wing bias.

You know you are way far left of Lenin when you think the media and Congress are right wing.

I bet you think the NEA is full of reactionaries and colleges are infiltrated by conservatives as well, don't you Serge?

Oh, and Colosteve: Getting away with murder because it is "old news"? Isn't that called the Ted Kennedy Defense?

YLG writes:
SSGT
As to the posts on the column, I wouldn't ask Mrs. Clinton any questions. I would probably "spill" my coffee accidentally while walking by the socket where the lie detector was plugged. It wouldn't be enough to eradicate her, but it would be enough to re-align her synapses!!

Unfortunately, she'd probably come an even more liberal, to the point that she would make Trotsky look conservative. Well, that would not occur, since she already makes Trotsky look conservative.

The mere fact that this many questions..
...can be legitimately raised about Ms. Clinton's record is sufficient reason to vote against her.

Regarding false testimony, the only difference between Hillary Clinton and Scooter Libby is that Ms. Clinton had a less aggressive prosecutor.

Regarding illegal campaign money, there isn't another politician in either party who has so consistently been tied to outright law-breakers. Every single campaign of hers displays the same, illegal tactics. Every time she has said "I certainly don't approve," she has lied.

Hawkins could arguably have produced another dozen or more questions, and probably stopped due to space.

The woman does not need to be running for President. She should be in prison.

If America elects Hillary Clinton President, America deserves the holocaust which will follow.

Criteria for reading material
What Taft has just admitted is that he refuses to read conservative writers. Because he's so open-minded, you see.

M. Stanton Evans has been a highly regarded journalist for almost 50 years. If Evans is "biased, and has an agenda," then, by definition, every conservatives is likewise biased, and has an agenda. But, to Taft, no liberal is biased, or has an agenda.

So basically, Taft, what you're saying is that you maintain your liberal point of view by refusing to consider even the smallest hint of an opposing viewpoint to pass before your eyes and enter your mind.

You are, in fact, a True Believer.

Of course, we already knew that about you, but it's interesting how close you just came to admitting it.

(Unrelated to this thread, please read my political blog, "Plumb Bob Blog: Squaring the Culture," at http://www.plumbbobblog.com. Thanks.)

It Only Takes Common Sense
For all you libs out there who think that conservatives are blind to the mis-givings of the Republican candidates and only target the Democrats because we are all dimwits who can't see the forest for the trees, get a grip! It only takes common sense to see who is a truth stretcher, a confabulator, an untrustworthy person or a GD lying b*tch.

We all know people in our circle of friends or acquaintances that play loose with their facts and generally, we just give them a pass because they are of no danger to our well being. Also, those who are notoriously known for lying are dismissed out of hand and generally shunned by the public, so as not to affect our lives.
In the Clinton's situation, they are not only both professional lyers, but also dangerous people who could cause general havoc to all citizens. Why the public has not applied the common sense factor to this obvious situation is beyond rationalization. Both of these hypocrits should have been run back to Arkansas years ago.

In short, just like in an accident, the first part of "first aid" is to stop the bleeding before you worry about the fractures, etc. We'll take care of our Republican fractures after we eliminate that hemorrhage to our nation, Hillary.



Lumberjack7392
Yup, you are right: she would come back even more rabid than before. But perhaps people would be repulsed by her, and no longer enamored of her plans.

Silly wish, I know....;-)

King Liberal writes:
and to split hairs Frank's lover was the one breaking the law, not Frank.

And as for Studds Washington DC law specifies an age of consent of 16, meaning that the relationships were legal-the page was 17; the committee felt, "any sexual relationship between a member of the House of Representatives and a congressional page, or any sexual advance by a member to a page, represents a serious breach of duty"

This was in 1983 so Foley certainly knew better as well.

Still in all Studds took advantage of a much younger man for sexual purposes. And you cannot believe that Frank had no idea what was going on in his own house or can you?. If Frank did NOT know then, he was and probably still is either amazingly stupid or amazingly gullible.

I do believe that all the Republican leadership in the Senate called for Craig's resignation. I am wondering why "Land Deal" Reid, "Lurch" Kerry, and "Driver's Ed Dropout" kennedy aren't calling for hearings on Craig. Could it be that they have a lot of skeletons in their closets.

Mystifying
Yes, it is indeed mystifying that the American people can be so gullible and uninformed. It will be a great tragedy for this contry if she ever makes it the the White House. They both belong in the Big House.

still more questions
1. When a major figure in your first co-administration died mysteriously (Vince Foster), the crime scene photos were lost, the autopsy x-rays were lost, and so forth; so that your co-administration was open to accusations of foul play. When a second major figure in your first co-administration died following a plane crash in Croatia (Ron Brown), the crime scene photos were lost, the autopsy x-rays were lost, and so forth; so that your co-administration was open to accusations of foul play, and so forth. QUESTION: How is it possible that your first co-administration was so ridiculously incompetent? And, have you never heard: "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me?"

2. When Jerry Parks, who had run the security for your husband in Arkansas, found out about Vince Foster's murder, the reportedly blanched and muttered, "I'm a dead man." He began carrying a gun, but was later murdered in his car in a gangland-style execution. As co-president and someone particularly close to Vince Foster, you might know about any connection between the two deaths. Why was Jerry Parks convinced (accurately, it turns out) that Vince Foster's "suicide" meant that he would be murdered?

3. In the 1996 election cycle, your co-campaign accepted million of dollars in illegal contributions from the Red Chinese -- from people like Wang Jun. Shortly after the election, the Loral Corporation, headed by a huge supporter of your party and your co-administration, illegally provided the technology to fix Chinese ICBM's, thus giving the the power to nuke us. Your co-administration allowed the illegal transfer of technology to pass. This is a two-part question: first, were you aware about any connection between the illegal acceptance of campaign funds, and the illegal transfer of technology that puts us at risk? Second, are you aware that High Treason is a hanging offense?

Inkling_revival
I find it disingenuous that you accuse me of hidden goals. I try to be an open book. Like I'm afraid to admit anything. If I want the truth about history, I don't choose someone who is a liberal or conservative,but a scholar or someone who is professional and leaves out biases. This technically is impossible, but many do try and come closer to the truth. When I first started to inform myself about the war in Afghanistan, I stayed away from any book that could give an untruthful slant, so I read books by unpolitical writers, like 3 cups of tea, or the Places In Between.

A Laughingstock
If Hillary makes it to the Whitehouse, which it still appears is a good bet; our country will be the laughingstock of the World. First, two terms for Bush and his cadre of incompetents, such as Cheney, Rumsfield, Bremer, Tommy Franks, that "FEMA guy", et al; and then Hillary. The world is going to conclude we are afraid to elect anybody with an IQ over 100 (oh, I forgot she is the smartest woman in the World). I know a number of Europeans and they cannot believe that Hillary is even in the running for President. She has no credibility whatsoever with reasonably intelligent foreigners, they keep asking what we Americans see as her accomplishments or experience other than Bill's "sometime" wife. However, she will probably fit pretty well with the other "kooks" now leading several key countries, i.e. King Hugo, Mullah Amadjedian, Playboy Kim Il and "Joe Stalin" Putin. My gosh, where are the adults in the World?

King Liberal writes:
As I understand it Mitch McConnel wanted the hearings but Craig called his bluff because he knows the republicans can't afford politically to have that kind of sideshow going on during an election year. So who's pandering to who here?

Reid, Kerry, and Kennedy could care less and why should they? Its you republicans who are hung up on this! You can't blame the dems for republicans not policing their own!

Three points:
One, the Dems never police their own, and haven't since the days of the Party Bosses, and Huey Long. As long as the candidate has D after his/her name, and sings the party line your side is fine with whatever they have done.
Two, if we're obsesseing on it, why do you libs keep bringing it up?
Three, Maybe, their ought to be a few investigations into Feinstein's Reids, and Clinton's financial shenanigans, but that won't happen will it?

Stanton Evans as Historian
When a guy wants to be taken seriously by the real world, he can't say goofy things like this..

"Liberals don't care what people do, as long as it's compulsory."

M. Stanton Evans

Taft writes:
Stanton Evans as Historian
When a guy wants to be taken seriously by the real world, he can't say goofy things like this..

"Liberals don't care what people do, as long as it's compulsory."

M. Stanton Evans

Except, he's right. Name one thing that liberals don't want to make compulsory.

old progrmr
Hillery is far from my first choice but she'd do much better than what we've tolerated the last 6-7 years. Europeans don't really have that much room to talk anyway, many of their politicians have turned out to be pretty quirky. And in the ME you have leaders in Israel who are involved with bizarre sex scandals. ect.. Another thing, Alan Greenspan likes the Clintons better than the Republicans.

Lumberjack7392
Serving in the Army.

KL
OK, I have had this rant before with touj, and now it is your turn:

It is H-I-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y!!!!

How is it you can spell "obfuscation" and not "hipocrisy"???!!!

HAVE SOME PITY!!!

King Liberal writes:
oh Lumberjack...
the point was you republicans claim to police your own, but you don't. Example: Larry Craig.
Case closed.

"One, the Dems never police their own, and haven't since the days of the Party Bosses, and Huey Long. As long as the candidate has D after his/her name, and sings the party line your side is fine with whatever they have done."

Ok whatever. Once again your peeps aparently do it as well. See above.

"Two, if we're obsesseing on it, why do you libs keep bringing it up?"

It might have something to do with hypocracsy.

"Three, Maybe, their ought to be a few investigations into Feinstein's Reids, and Clinton's financial shenanigans, but that won't happen will it?"

Obfuscation. I say you don't police your own you point the finger elsewhere at us. Ok. Typical.

Maybe if you policed your own, your screaming about Craig may have some value. Republicans have called for his resignation. Dems have not in the cases I mentioned along with that paragon of virtue William Jefferson, D-Bribee of LA. You could throw in Murtha D-ABSCAM of PA, just for good measure.
BTW, what Craig did is a misdeamor, what your side were felonies, big difference.

Taft writes:
Lumberjack7392
Serving in the Army.

I forgot about that. It's the one thing most libs won't do, lay their a$$ on the line for their country.

Lumberjack7392
Btw, your a professional. When reading history, one must choose carefully, a lot of crap gets passed off as history. Correct?

Taft writes:
Lumberjack7392
Btw, your a professional. When reading history, one must choose carefully, a lot of crap gets passed off as history. Correct?

Especially from leftist, revisionist, anti-American historians. Unfortunately, that is what is being taught today, and most of is pure dee sh!t.

Hillary submit to a polygraph? Ha!
Would Hillary submit to a polygraph test? She might under one condtion: she and a group of specially-appointed "technicians" must be allowed to "inspect" the machine beforehand to make sure it wasn't rigged.

While they were "inspecting" the machine, of course, they'd rig it.

Lumberjack7392
"Most libs won't lay their a** on the line."

Now, that is a charge you should back up.

Taft writes
Lumberjack7392
"Most libs won't lay their a** on the line."

Now, that is a charge you should back up

How many have you seen enlist? All I see libs do is run around demeaning the military, (Ex Kerry, Murtha, Reid, Pelosi) and claim the military are bunch of losers.

Taking Advice from Disbarred Lawyer???
It appears that Bill is offering and Hillary Clinton is taking his advice. I wonder if she would recommend that all americans seek the advice of a disbarred lawyer?

Lumber
I gave you one example. Can you now name one thing the republicans "don't make compulsory"?

King Liberal writes:
BTW didn't you get robert banned? He must have 100 spare IP addys!

And unfortunately, he will use any one of them to get back in. He's like an irremovable haemmorhoid, a consteant pain in the butt.
K-L I will say this, you are one of the few libs here, that I actually enjoy crossing verbal and mental swords with. You are civil, and state you ideas fairly succintly, and I respect that.

YLG-Ssgt
YLG - I'm glad you enjoy my style :)!

Ssgt - WOW! With what weapon?

Taft writes:
Lumber
I gave you one example. Can you now name one thing the republicans "don't make compulsory"?

Speech codes

King Liberal writes
I might be a liberal, but the US Army taught me how to shoot.

As for me it was my Dad, FBI Firearms Instructors at the SC Criminal Justice Academy, and the US Navy.

BTW, own any weapons?

Tampa Dave:
Good job on the ‘storm the castle’ response to King Lib. Apparently you hit a nerve.

King Liberal writes:
Lumberjack
ok I'm less mad having seen your last post.
But don't you forget there a few(i know less than 10%) liberals out there in the desert right now!

"You are civil, and state you ideas fairly succintly, and I respect that."

Now if only our candidates-and yes especially Hillary-did the same!

I'll cross swords with ya any day; a fight with out honor is not a fight worth having! You're a partisan, but you're no stooge!


My comment about not serving is based upon what I have observed the past few years. There are very few libs out there serving, and I respect their service and yours. We may differ on policy, but we are both veterans, and know what it means to serve. At least you got thanked upon your return from Desert Storm, which is more than the Vietnam and post-Vietnam troops ever did.

King Liberal writes:
Lumberjack
i own a S&W Model 19 with a 2 inch barrel. I use .38P+ but keep some mag rounds nearby.
And I have a Winchester 870 that belonged to my Grandfather.


Own a .22 bolt action rifle with an 8 shot magazine, a bolt acion6mm rifle, a .25 calibre semi-automatic, and a Ruger Security 6 .357 magnum.
I grew up shooting an 870. I probably ran 7500 rounfs through that gun. Unfortunately it was sold right after my Dad died in March. I sure wish I could have gotten that gun back.

Not quite King Lib
Actually, what Studds did was to take a minor on a trip to a place where the age of consent was lower and have sex. There is law against this and he should have been prosecuted for it and yet wasn’t. As deplorable as the Mark Foley situation was; He at least did not have sex with any underage page or even of age page (or intern). Yet he is gone and did not receive a standing ovation from his Republican colleagues.

Oh, and Pres. Clinton did admit to perjury and lost his license to practice law. So, yes, he was never convicted but he still did it.

Hawkins and His Humor
I want to thank Mr. Hawkins for giving me such a good laugh. He talks about the Clintons getting a free pass on the items he "discusses." I would say let's bring up Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon. You younger readers should go find a book entitled "The History of the United States" and read about our presidential FELON.

He got a free pass because Gerald Ford thought the country had suffered enough due to the crimes this man allegedly committed. Why allegedly? He was never brought to trial. He bailed. He skipped. We had a president who quit.

"5) You once turned $1,000 into $100,000 in less than a year in the cattle futures market. The odds that this was done legitimately have been put, in some estimates, as high as 250 million to 1. It has been alleged, and seems likely, that the $100,000 was actually bribe money that was paid to you while the cattle futures market was merely used as cover for the payout. With that in mind, were your cattle futures winnings actually bribe money?"


I am not sure if this would qualify as libel or slander. But as long as there is a chance they could have made the money, the might have. Las Vegas profits on that philosophy. Do you actually think ANYONE would sit in a chair while you asked them if they took a bribe. Spiro Agnew would not have.

Remember Spiro? Another little page out of Republican history that some of you conveniently forget.



Fingerman writes:
am not sure if this would qualify as libel or slander. But as long as there is a chance they could have made the money, the might have. Las Vegas profits on that philosophy. Do you actually think ANYONE would sit in a chair while you asked them if they took a bribe. Spiro Agnew would not have.

Remember Spiro? Another little page out of Republican history that some of you conveniently forget.

Both Nixon and Agnew resigned from office over their transgressions. "Wee Willie Weinie Wagger" Clinton, "Drivers Ed Dropout" Kennedy, "Icebox Cash" Jefferson, "ASCAM" MURTHA, and "MAke My Husband Rich" Feinstein did not. Bog difference there.

Nope fingerman
I do know that bit of history. I'd suggest reading the book "Silent Coupe", one of the most thoroughly researched books ever written on the subject if you can find it. Unfortunately, it came out pre- Fox news and in the early years of talk radio so not many have heard of it. 60 min "shelved" the story they had produced on at the "request" of the left.

Lumberjack7392
When did facts ever matter to a Liberal?

Georgetwin writes:
Lumberjack7392
When did facts ever matter to a Liberal?

Only when hey can be bent enough to be used to the liberal's advantage.

Jason Bourne
The best lie detector test, "You lie, You die."

Bourne Ultimatum.

Lumberjack7392
Did you expect Clinton to resign over an extramarital affair? Maybe Gingrich should resign too. Besides, according to Kissinger, Nixon was so drunk most of the time he wasn't fit to be president. Nixon hated Kissinger too, though. I get tired of comparing the current republicans with the Clintons, they should face the music period.

Taft writes:
Lumberjack7392
Did you expect Clinton to resign over an extramarital affair? Maybe Gingrich should resign too. Besides, according to Kissinger, Nixon was so drunk most of the time he wasn't fit to be president. Nixon hated Kissinger too, though. I get tired of comparing the current republicans with the Clintons, they should face the music period.

Not for that, but perjury and obstruction of justice yes.

Lumberjack7392
So we spend billions of our tax dollars to get Clinton on lying about an affair, who wouldn't lie?

Watch her squirm
As I try to envision Hellary being hooked up to a lie detector, I imagine it would go something like the scene in "The Omen" where Damian, along with his mother and father, approach the church in their car and Damian freaks out kicking and screaming until they drive off.

Maybe if someone threw some holywater on the Hildebeast, she'd go away.

Taft writes:
Lumberjack7392
So we spend billions of our tax dollars to get Clinton on lying about an affair, who wouldn't lie?

Perjury and Obstruction of Justice are FELONIES. Wee Willie Weinie Wagger was a lawyer, and should have known that.

Lumberjack7392
Well maybe Libby should be behind bars too then. At least Clinton didn't disclose a CIA agent for revenge.

Corndog writes
Watch her squirm
As I try to envision Hellary being hooked up to a lie detector, I imagine it would go something like the scene in "The Omen" where Damian, along with his mother and father, approach the church in their car and Damian freaks out kicking and screaming until they drive off.

Maybe if someone threw some holywater on the Hildebeast, she'd go away.

i doubt that that would help. Now maybe if we could get St. Michael and his army of Archangels to help, maybe we could get her to go away.

treasonous repugs writes:
lumberjack
"Not for that, but perjury and obstruction of justice yes."

-what are you refering to? if you are talking about his denial of the bj then i would say that is a minor transgression and must applaud you for your "letter-of-the-law" mentality. but then you go and support bush spying americans illegally. what gives

Would you be so quick to dismiss these two felonies for the same thing if thethe POTUS were Republican. I doubt it.

Questions Poorly Formed
guys, guys, guys...

Hitlary is a lawyer...and she knows that such questions are inadmissible -- ya can't ask that -- if they are not in proper form.

Only one issue per question - no compound questions - especially when a yes or no is the expected response.

No vague questions, no misleading questions, and no questions that may be too biased or put the witness in a bad light.

OOOPS! I forgot...that only applies during a trial with the witness on the stand...Hitlary is a candidate for POTUS...so everything goes!

Carry on...

to: treasonous repugs
You're an idiot if you think Bush has been "spying americans illegally". Go back and do some research. Bush was pushing for legislation that would give the same power to our intelligence services that is already in place to catch drug smugglers and other lowlifes. He was doing the proper thing and taking the legal steps to get domestic spying approval for terror suspects. If you think spying on terror suspects is wrong, then you've been drinking the Kool-Aid of liberalism for far too long. Do you just recite every liberal talking point you hear, no matter how stupid?

As to the point of this article, it'd be nice for Hillary just to be asked some (actually tough, serious) questions instead of only being lobbed a couple softballs from people she's authorized to interview her. It's a joke that someone as corrupt as her, and as untested and unquestioned as far as her views, can be this close to the White House. Can American stand another 4 years of Clinton? I say heck no!

robert the fake and fraud has no idea


what he's talking about!




These are not "ethical lapses"
Hawkins quotes Peggy Noonan:

"People have pointed out (Hillary's) ethical lapses for so long that they seem boring, or impossible to believe."

When a politician has as many repeated "ethical lapses" as either of the Clintons, they are not lapses. This is especially true when it seems to be the same ethical lapse over and over again, such as the illegal/improper campaign funding.

This kind of behavior is not a lapse of ethics. It is that person's "ethics" (or lack of ethics, if you prefer to think of it that way).

The Clinton ethic is to lie, cheat, steal, smear, threaten, blackmail, extort, and let your minons take the fall if someone has to be given up. Whatever it takes to win; to get what they want. This is not a public service ethic. This is sociopathology at it worst.

These people cannot be allowed to regain control of the government of the world's lone superpower. The potential ramifications for humankind are catastrophic on a biblical scale.

For Texn Engineer
The argument that the questions are "inadmissible" as "formed" is irrelevant, since lie detector results are not admissible in court no matter how the questions are formed.

And I wouldn't count too much on Mrs. Clinton's legal prowess if I were you. The Rose Law Firm partners only took her on because they had to, not because they wanted to. Her work for the firm was second-rate at best, and when she got to DC she flunked the DC Bar Exam, which is one of the easiest in the country.

The concept that either one of the Clintons, who both have law degrees and at one time had law licenses, would actually wind up arguing a case in a court of law shows how far we have fallen as a society of laws.

The old saying is that anyone who likes sausage and respects the law should never watch either one being made. Well, guess what. A lot of law is 'made' in courtrooms, with lawyers like Slick Willie and the Shrew, arguing before activist judges.

Don't watch it.

Lumberjack
If someone through holy water on Mrs. Clinton it would either burn through like she was a vampire or she would melt like the wicked witch of the west.

liar liars, their pants are on fire...
she and her husband have been lying for so long, neither of them know lying from the truth. they think their lies ARE the truth. scary individuals like that should be caged.

True, all true!
For the libs, no, we won't shut up about it until she finally answers those questions! You libs have looked the other way concerning their corrupt and criminal behavior for too long. Now you want to re-contaminate the Presidency again. No way!

One more question....
Mrs. Clinton, boxers or briefs?

Robert
What does Wonder Woman ask you when you have one of her dresses around you?

laughed...but encouraged
so many funny comments...and iam encouraged to realize that there are so many people that are
great at remembering all of the terrible deeds and ..................................
statements..by hillary! the most chilling(never found the bullett!) incident:the immense cover up in the death of vince foster as one of the contributors pointed out!this woman is super dangerous..and totally void of morals!
by the way.........there may be some real surprises before this is over....? it is possible
that the final showdown will be between two men
who have not been in politics for a long time!
and it is possible that new york and arkansas will not be their home states...but both from the east!? no hillary,rudy,mike--hmmmm??? elvis

OOOH Wobbie, I'M WOUNDED! NOT!
Go to Wal-Mart and get in some flight time.

Wiseone says:
"Her work for the firm was second-rate at best, and when she got to DC she flunked the DC Bar Exam, which is one of the easiest in the country."

I'm sure YOU passed it with flying colors - or did you read somewhere that it was easy?

PS - how are you able to evaluate Hillary's work at Rose? Were you an attorney there?

Didn't think so...




EX says:
"Doggie:
When blacks were fighting to eat at the same lunch counter or more importantly go to the same high school, who sent in the National Guard to get them in the door? (Hint: Dwight David Eisenhower)"

Terrific - if he were President now, Town Hallers would be slamming him - talking about states rights or some nonsense - calling him a traitor. I bet many do...

"When the Vietnam War was raging, a war started by John Fitzgerald Kennedy and turned into a full on conflagration by the bogus Bay of Tonkin incident promulgatged by Lyndon Baines Johnson, who finally put an end to it? (Hint: Richard Milhaus Nixon)"

I don't disagree - but,I guarantee that most Town Hallers would find Nixon too liberal: "As President, Nixon imposed wage and price controls, indexed Social Security for inflation, and created Supplemental Security Income (SSI). The number of pages added to the Federal Register each year doubled under Nixon. He eradicated the last remnants of the gold standard, created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)."

But if they didn't, most would excoriate you for the way you present the history of the war: started by Democrats, abandoned by Republicans...

Regardless, Democrat DOES NOT EQUAL liberal - particularly 50 years ago...



Hillary Clinton
I think Hillary Clinton is the most dangerous person in the world; she may actually exceed the dangers of the Antichrist forecast in the Bible.
Anyone considering voting for her obviously has the IQ of a house plant!

wiseone
you are correct that lie detector tests are not admissible in a trial, but ONLY if one attorney objects... fail to object, and the judge can admit it. No kidding!

Even then, the questions asked during the lie detector test can be objected to and thrown out for the reasons given above, compound, misleading, improper foundation, etc.

An example would be: Did you beat your wife with a hammer on April 23rd? That question has at least three objectionable aspects. 'Beat' is inflammatory. Could have beat his wife but without a hammer and not on the 23rd, etc. A simple yes or no does not suffice.

All this is irrelevant, though. The point of the article is that Hitlary has a long list of highly suspect, perhaps criminal, activities over a long period of time. These should be brought up over and over and over.

By the way...when anyone sees a Hillary bumper sticker, wouldn't it be great to use some white marker (perhaps fingernail polish?) to place a small horizontal bar through the first letter *L*, converting the word to *Hitlary*?

Your Productive Idea
Dear Mr. Hawkins:

Wouldn't it benefit us all if ALL politicians seeking or occupying the nation's highest office were compelled to respond to questions under oath? For instance, here are a few of the questions I would submit to Pres. Bush:

1) Mr. President: Re 9/11, why did you discount as "historical in nature" the dire Aug. 6, 2001 warning by two CIA analysts that "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." was "CURRENT AND SERIOUS"? Especially given the fact that you yourself had previously directed the CIA to advise you whether any of the terrorist threats abounding during the summer of 2001 pointed to a terrorist attack upon the U.S.? (Page 260, 9/11 Commission Report)

2) What is your response to Fox News Analyst and Conservative Republican James P. Pinkerton who wrote on April 9, 2004 that "President George W. Bush received a blunt warning five weeks before 9/11 and did little or nothing"? (Newsday, 4/9/04)

3) Re Osama bin Laden, why have you failed to make good on your repeated promise to bring to justice ("dead or alive") the terrorist leader/mass murderer universally acknowledged as the force behind the Sept. 11, 2001 calamitous attacks which left 3,000 dead on our soil?

4) Re 9/11, what exactly were you trying to say when on Aug. 16, 2004 you told a crowd in Traverse City, Mich. that "After 9/11 we must take threats seriously?" Why hadn't you taken seriously the ominous threats of terrorist attack BEFORE 9/11?

(Continued)
DaveF

Your Productive Idea (continued)
5) Re Hurricane Katrina, why did you fail to make good on your pre-Katrina promise to "do all in our power" to assist the people in the Gulf Coast communities affected by the storm? Why wasn't federal aid forthcoming immediately, especially since you yourself on Aug. 28, 2005 had warned people of Katrina's approaching ferocity and had vowed to provide that federal aid?

6) Re Iraq, what is your response to Town Hall columnist and National Review Editor Rich Lowry who wrote on Oct. 8, 2007 that "The U.S. Government has never brought to bear its resources in a truly national effort to wn (the Iraq War)"? Especially given your repeated declaration that the fate of the United States is tied into victory in Iraq.

7) Re Iraq, Why have you failed to meet your objectives you set forth on Oct. 7, 2002, when selling the war to the American people you vowed, "the United States and our allies will help the Iraqi people rebuild their economy, and create the institutions of liberty in a unified Iraq at peace with its neighbors."

And also, "by our actions, we will secure the peace, and lead the world to a better day."

Dave F




new parody
my blog

New Constitution?
WeTheSheeple writes: Friday, December, 07, 2007 11:02 AM

"Go Hillary
I hope Hillary wins just to irritate everybody on this site. She's a politician, no better or worse than any other politician- democrat, republican, or whatever. They all lie, cheat, steal, & kill to get where they are. We need to scrap the entire system and start over with a new constitution."

Why? What's wrong with the one we have now? It's in fine shape - never been used.

Interesting reading
http://prorev.com/legacy.htm

What luck...
Ever wonder what would have happened if John Kennedy Jr. had lived and ran for the New York Senate? Hillary's political career would have been over before it started. Looking back, only a New York Senate win could have given her the opportunity to run for the Presidency today. I guess it's just fate that John Kennedy died and Hillary gets the opportunity to run for President. How sad.

Hillary =s Liar
Jackie Mason said that with Bill Clinton you didn't need a lie detector, you needed a truth detector. Hillary is probably a thousand times worse.
Since Bill Clinton allowed the Red Chinese to obtain top-secret computer chips, allowing their missile program to jump forward, for campaign contributions from the Chinese Army, I would ask Hillary what top-secret information she plans on giving away for more campaign funding.
I would also like to know why her fingerprints are all over those 900 FBI files she knew nothing about.
With her hubby, the major-league scandals began after he was in office. With her the scandals are already flying and she hasn't even been nominated yet.
This is what we have to look forward to if the American people are insane enough to send this witch back to the White House.

My 1 question to Hillary
Of all the women who say they were sexually harassed by your husband!

Are they all lying?

Gennifer Flowers wasn't lying even tho you destroyed her in the liberal madia!

Monica wasn't lying she had the blue dress!

And Linda Tripp?
I thought you celebrated whistle blowers?
Why is she trashed by you also?

WOMENS RIGHTS?
HUH?

So are all the women lying or do you support a sex abuser?

Questions to ask Hillary
I'd add another question about the 40 or so people who knew bad things about the Clintons and who died under questionable or suspicious circumstances.

How about answering the following?
The Clinton Legacy

http://prorev.com/legacy.htm

This list was compiled at the end of the Clinton administration. It was last partially updated in 2000

Our Clinton Scandal Index

The Clintons, to adapt a line from Dr. Johnson, were not only corrupt, they were the cause of corruption in others. Yet seldom in America have so many come to excuse so much mendacity and malfeasance as during the Clinton years. Here are some of the facts that have been buried.
RECORDS SET

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance

- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*

- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation

- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify

- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly

- First president sued for sexual harassment.

- First president accused of rape.

- First first lady to come under criminal investigation

- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case

- First president to establish a legal defense fund.

- First president to be held in contempt of court

- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions

- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad

- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court



And this is just for starters!!!!!!!!



Yup.. Clintoons say it's old news
And even the dead bodies in their wake ... are old news....

MURDER? Yes. I mean how many people on earth KNOW 40 or 50 people personally, that are now dead? And even if you know 40 people who committed suicide, was the gun shot wound to the back of the head?

But, it's old news, and the clintoons command us to just MOVE ON. I am convinced that MOVEON.ORG is the voice of none other than the voice of the clintoonistas who will not, cannot be held accountable for any wrong doing on earth.

CHECK OUT YOUTUBE SPOOF OF THE DEBATE
Check out this youtube video Tom Tancredo posted today. It's hilarious making fun of the Univision Republican Debate tonight. He's urging people to boycott the Spanish language Presidential debate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5GUCQAdlxg&feature=user

Enjoy!

14 Questions for Hillary
Haven't we had enough of the Clintons? There is no one running who would be as divisive as Hillary. Is that what we want? I hope not. She has proven time after time that she is dishonest, disgusting, and power hungry. Could we find anyone less appealing as a Presidential candadite? She is considered a joke internationally. Remember the British asking exactly what experience ( I mean as a leader) does Hillary have? She makes Obama look positively experienced. For all woman feminists do you really want someone who only got where she is because of a man? Think about her as a representative of women.

Frank

I can see Inauguration Day 2009...
--
...in which Hillary takes the oath of office and is handed the subpoena for her impeachment proceedings simultaneously.

Y'know, the scenario envisioned for Hillary in the 2001 novel *Hope* (L. Neil Smith and Aaron Zelman, published by Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership) would actually do the woman a great kindness.

She gets run off a mountain road during the '08 presidential campaign by a hippie microbus with bad brakes and dies in a massive fireball.

Hey, it could still happen.

--

Valid Questions
Why has the media gone all wobbly on Hillary Clinton? All of the questions that Hawkins asks here are fair game, as are questions about the FBI files, the break-in at Kathleen Willey's house, and what role Hillary played in covering up Bill Clinton's sexual assaults.

A serious reporter facing a presidential candidate with as shady a past as Hillary Clinton would ask the tough questions and hold her to account. If she does get the nomination (which is by no means a sure thing), expect the "swift-boat" ads to look like glowing praise compared to the attack ads private groups put out about her.

The lie detector.......
How about using a machine for this that administered an incredibly painful electric jolt when a lie was detected?

Hillary and the lie detector
A person who has no qualms about lying would pass a lie detector test because the machine would not detect anything. Hillary could be lying through her teeth and pass with flying colors. That's just one of the reasons she's so dangerous.

Questions to Hillary
Brushing off Hillary's scandals is too easy for most liberals. I would rather ask her to please elaborate on her presidential plans to; (a) restore our military to its full strength. Curently the total military populations including the coast guard is less than 1/2 percent of our national population. (b) Restore our industrial and, therefore, our employment strength, (c) strengthen our individual liberties including the ability to hear any points of view we choose.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.