Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, May 11, 2007
John Hawkins :: Townhall.com Columnist
Five Things You Can't Say In America
by John Hawkins
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The title of this column is taken from Larry Elder's superb book Ten Things You Can't Say In America, even though we don't cover much of the same ground. Hopefully, Larry won't mind because imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery.

1) The U.S. military should be far less concerned about civilian casualties. We've gotten to the point where the United States is now regularly getting into conflicts with enemy nations that have far less regard for the lives of civilians in their countries than we do. We hold off on hitting high value targets because civilians are in the area and straitjacket our troops with rules of engagement that make it more likely they'll be killed. Meanwhile, the people we're fighting wear no uniforms and deliberately place military assets in areas full of civilians in order to use them as human shields. Yet, who gets blamed if the civilians are killed? Our troops, instead of the people who deliberately put innocents in danger.

Moreover, although we shouldn't be cavalier about taking the lives of civilians, safeguarding the lives of our soldiers and winning the wars we fight are more important than the civilian bodycount. It's better to lose foreign civilians than our soldiers and it's better to kill large numbers of civilians than lose a war. That's how we looked at it in World War II and it's how we should look at it today.

2) We would be better off if fewer people voted. We have fetishized voting in this country to the point where we've actually had serious proposals to make the vote into a lottery, where one lucky person will win a million dollars just for voting.

But the truth is, we'd be better off as a country if less people voted. For example, why in the world would we want to give felons or illegal immigrants the right to vote in elections (and yes, they do get to vote in parts of the country)?

On a different note, a Pew Research Poll in April of this month found that only 69% of Americans know that Dick Cheney is the sitting Vice-President. Honestly, if you don't even know who the Veep is, you're too uninformed to be voting.

The same goes for conspiracy theorists. According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 22% of Americans think George Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance and 29% think the CIA was clued in. These people are too nuts to be voting.

Then there are people who have to get ballots in languages other than English. If you're an immigrant, you're supposed to learn English as a prerequisite of becoming an American and if you were born in this country, you should know how to speak English. So, who exactly are we supposed to be creating these ballots for?

Does this seem out-of-line? Suggesting that people who vote should be American citizens, non-felons, informed, not-crazy, and able to speak English if they're going to be voting? I don't think so. That's why if anything, we'd be better off encouraging people like that to stay home, instead of encouraging them to vote.

3) Men are better equipped than women to do certain jobs: Some jobs, like fireman, policeman, and soldier are better filled by men than women. That's because men on the whole are much more athletic than women as a whole. Sure, you can point to exceptions to the rule. There are plenty of men who are out of shape and there are some incredibly gifted women athletes who surpass the vast majority of the male population in physical skills.

But, when you're talking about people who are in reasonably good shape, 99 times out of a hundred, a man is going to be better able to carry someone out of a burning building, deal with a physically violent suspect, or carry 90 pounds of gear into combat better than a woman simply because he's bigger, stronger, and faster. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News, Linkiest, and Viral Footage.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Principle trumps power


Does anyone support Gonzales staying as Attorney General? Why would President Bush appoint Gonzales as AG knowing his past ethical problems?

USA TODAY-Three years ago, an attorney general, his deputy, the FBI director and others put their jobs on the line to block a White House wiretapping plan. The story, revealed Tuesday, speaks worlds about the importance of upholding principle under pressure — and about the current attorney general’s failure to do just that.

James Comey: “I thought I just witnessed an effort to take advantage of a very sick man, who did not have the powers of the attorney general,” the former deputy AG says

Watch
http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/principle-trumps-power

James Comey testimony should be seen no matter what party you are in!


jimmy joe
I am not economist, but I was in school 19 years.
Listen carefully, and periodically you will hear several statistics that indicate that Americans are and have been burning savings at an alarming rate for an unprecedented time; which is interpreted to mean that people are not earning enough to get by. I have been living off of savings for a long time, despite fact that I am not retired. The NYT article on unemployed males had over 25% in Ky and Miss; and over 15 or 17% in approximately 14 other states, including many in south and heartland. Those are 4 to 6 times the widely touted average, but those averages do not count under-employed, such as me, at all. It is true that you are marching toward the ten cent walkman, but you are also past the point where many do not have the ten cents. Most captial investment today is high tech; and big fabs that automatically make semiconductors can cost 7 to 10 billion or more, and are almost fully automated; so that actual human employment is a tiny, tiny fraction of the investment. We do not even have policies to keep those here, even though the political and economic risks from any standpoint of sanity would favor our country; not to mention the avowed practices of theft and intimidation for gift of technology faced by our companies. I know that a small minority prospers, but overall, you will never convince me that we have not been defrauded and hurt by stupid leadership.
In fact, I believe the elite group is set on destroying our country and replacing those of us who are descendants of signers of the Declaration of Independence with Mexicans and other UN representatives (in the same way an evil preacher can drive off all thinkers and effectively replace the entire congregation if the "franchise" name is strong enough). Next I am going to copy part of a post I made, too late, as last entry on old dead string yesterday, so that at least one person reads it, but I abbreviate it for you. The war on terror is a complete fraud designed to push Israel's agenda and insulate it from accountability. Crimes against humanity are long overdue against it.

Our media problem is huge, with less than 1% of journalists having the courage to buck the intimidators. They believe that money should prevail over truth and justice, which is evil to everybody else. A consequence of years of one sided reporting creates a sort of mental illness on the part of the populace; not unlike what happened in Russia. Follow the few great Americans (and read archives) with courage to speak truth to power: Pat Buchanan, Paul Craig Roberts, and Lou Dobbs.

Our media’s ability to create an artificial reality by coordinating articles from a small succession of similar persusion journalists is incredible, whether that is hating a new country or religion or people, or altering our taste for torture (with presentation of it in favorable light by Washington Post and television series 24); not to mention the culture attack via advertisements. Neocons advocated creative destruction of all of our laws, culture, traditions; and too many of us are silently tolerating it. They can control our “polls” like a water spigot.
Remember the attack on USS Liberty which was only reported in two obscure newspapers in USA in 1967, and not mentioned for 30 years. Such cover ups are justified under theory that Israel could not survive the disclosure of the truth, but the retort is that it justly deserves the consequences. Doubtless, that excuse was dusted off for all of the evidentiary links for Israel to 9/11, which were “classified” just like USS Liberty.
Despite our need for truth and freedom of ideas: Consider this, if the head of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University cannot get his article critical of Israeli Lobby published in USA (last year); yet the Washington Post permits Jews to publish long feature articles critical of the same article (that cannot be published here); little wonder that the rest of us have no voice.

How much oil we could have bought with the trillion dollars plus that we have and will spend on Iraqi (and reportedly the medical and custodial bills of severely wounded soldiers will exceed the half trillion that we spent early)? We could have given each family of the 5,000,000 Palestinians who live on less than $2. a day a million dollars (except it is politically incorrect/impossible to consider any aid to them, and that sum would be way too much, as it would have Israelis claiming to be Palestinian). It is staggering to walk around the cost and the carnage; and realize the infrastructure is still in tatters; and the area set to be worse. It is horrifying to read articles that encourage GWB to preemptively nuke nations as means of allegedly salvaging his legacy (win by nuking the innocent; sounds like a Columbine massacre type thought).
Our 9/11 Commission expressly refused to look into the issue of our "evilness" or complicity in causing 9/11 and due to politics, refused the wise advice of two former secretaries of State, Zibrenewski (sp) and James Baker to the effect that the first things to do are to attack those that attacked you and quickly and quietly redress and cure the areas of our moral weakness/wickedness which was the oppression of the Palestinians. However, Israelis will not permit any meaningful aid, and want only vengence and retribution; despite their richer history in dispensing terror (which is not PC to report here). So we opt to fight for eternity, as the evil ones, without aspiring to moral high ground. By controlling the mainstream media and our politicians, the elite group not only controls the war agenda, but immigration, globalization, mindless promotion of minorities, etc. Our sensitivities are numbed, and we are enslaved; yet it is imperative that we seek maturity and wisdom; and help from others; and good to talk. Thanks for reading.

By the way, our congressmen are just totally intimidated, and have been, so we are under their control, as for one example, this one from former Senator from South Dakota: "I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear--fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress--at least when I served there--have any affection for Israel or for its Lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being found out exactly how they feel. I've heard too many cloakroom conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter feelings about how they're pushed around by the Lobby to think otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics of the Lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the Lobby's animosity by making their feelings public."
--("Former Senator James Abourezk on Chomsky and the Israel Lobby in the US", Al-Jazeerah, December 5, 2006.)



Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.