Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, June 30, 2008
Jennifer Roback Morse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Now You Tell Us
by Jennifer Roback Morse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The advocates of contraception have finally admitted in public what some of us have known for a while: The Pill doesn't work very well.  Professor James Trussell of Princeton, one of the world experts on failure rates of various forms of contraception, told a conference in the UK:

“One in 12 women taking the Pill gets pregnant each year because they miss so many tablets. ….Half of all pregnancies in America are unintended and half of those happen because contraception failed or was not taken properly, the rest were not using any contraception.”

I just spoke at an abstinence education conference in South Carolina, on this very subject of contraceptive failure.  South Carolina Parents Involved in Education brought together middle and high school teachers and guidance counselors for training on abstinence.  Probably two-thirds of the audience was female. Easily half the audience was African-American.

I showed the participants this chart (Table 2) reporting failure rates of the Pill broken down by demographic groups. It turns out that poor, cohabiting teenagers using the Pill have a failure rate of almost 50%: 48.4% to be exact. That means, out of 100 low income girls taking the Pill, who are under the age of 20 and living with their boyfriends, 48 of them will have a pregnancy within 12 months.  

People usually gasp when I show that chart. (Last year I did an article on the subject. The lefty netroots went nuts.) My South Carolina teachers weren’t surprised. They see “contraceptive failures” among their students all the time. A little thought will tell you why the failure rates are so high: the women aren't using their contraception correctly. Prof. Trussel confirms this point:

“Studies have shown women miss three times as many pills as they say they do. Computerized pill packs have revealed that … between 10 per cent and 14 per cent admitted missing more than three pills in a month, actually between 30 per cent and 50 per cent missed that many.”

Now you tell us, after years of government sponsored contraceptive education, that women still aren’t using it consistently or correctly.  Experts like Dr. Trussell have given up on educating women on proper contraceptive use. His preferred solution is long-acting hormonal contraceptives, like implants and injectables. In other words, he proposes that women chemically neuter themselves during their peak child-bearing years.

Prof. Trussell also admitted what American pro-life leaders have said all along: “emergency contraception” is not a magic pill. “Increasing access to emergency contraception will not reduce unintended pregnancies and the resulting abortions, despite a massive Government drive to provide it free to young girls. It is unrealistic to expect women to take the emergency contraceptive every time they have unprotected sex.  It has not reduced unintended pregnancies in America or anywhere else that has introduced it.”

You heard it here first, folks: Contraception, even the emergency type, is not realistic.

The experts don’t seem to consider a major alternative: we could encourage teenagers to take sex and child-bearing seriously.  Our culture actively promotes sex as a recreational activity. We come up with more aggressive and intrusive forms of contraception, because we can’t bring ourselves to tell teenagers that they should take sex seriously.  

We seem to be unwilling to face the fact that contraception itself contributes to the problem of not taking sex seriously.  Contraception allows people to get involved in relationships that can’t possibly sustain a pregnancy.  We then call the resulting pregnancy “unintended,” a mechanical problem requiring a technical solution.  After all, we are not supposed to be “judgmental” or “moralistic” about sex.

But there really is something wrong with purely recreational sex with someone that would be a disaster to be a parent with.  We are using the other person as an object that gives us pleasure. We are not seeing our sex partner as the potential parent of our child, which they are, even if we don’t “intend” it.  We are not giving ourselves completely to the other person. We are holding ourselves back, even as we expect sexual satisfaction from them.  We have created a culture of “use and be used,” instead of “love and be loved.”  The fact that the other person agrees to be used doesn’t make it ok.

As long as adults consider unlimited sex an entitlement, our young people will have problems that contraception can’t solve.  

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D., is the author of Smart Sex: Finding Life-long Love In A Hook-up World. She blogs at jennifer-roback-morse.blogspot.com

Be the first to read Jennifer Morse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Misleading with Intent to Lie
"The advocates of contraception have finally admitted in public what some of us have known for a while: The Pill doesn't work very well."

The article you linked to says that USE OF THE PILL for contraception doesn't work very well because women fail to take them. It then says that "Women should instead use longer-lasting methods such as the implant or intra-uterine device (IUD) which can be fitted and forgotten."

Let's face it, ABSTINENCE DOESN'T WORK VERY WELL if you forget to follow its principles.

Your article is a downright lie.

No lie.
Teens having unprotected sex are vastly more likely to produce a pregnancy than those who are practicing abstinence. I'm afraid I don't have the numbers to back me up on that, but I'm sure I read it somewhere.

Mr. Munck, there are tens of thousands of teens who are choosing abstinence, and not all of them are rabid Christians. Some kids believe themselves to be something more than animals, that maybe the very temporary rewards of premarital sex don't outweigh the risks.

Let's see, 'Did I remember that pill today?' versus 'Did I have unprotected sex with anyone today?' Which do you think is an easier question?

1udagudguys 2:02 PM EST
"there are tens of thousands of teens who are choosing abstinence"

That's really great, but there are about 38 million teenagers in the country. Having 0.25% of them choosing abstinence voluntarily doesn't make much of a dent. And remember, these are teenagers; teenagers lie, about sex, about everything. They lie to their parents, their teachers, their clergy, and definitely to sociologists.

"Let's see, 'Did I remember that pill today?' versus 'Did I have unprotected sex with anyone today?' Which do you think is an easier question?"

That's why the article recommended implants and IUDs for contraception. I personally believe that every human being capable of fathering or bearing a child should be able to get a contraceptive implant if he or she wants it, with no other person allowed to prevent it.

Condoms
Condoms work exceptionally well against unwanted pregnancies. Of course, the righty moonbats who live on a fantasy planet don't want people to have access to those, either. They'd rather teens have unprotected sex and either bear unwanted children or have abortions.

When a majority of adults

act as though sexual pleasure is more important than their health, why do you expect young people to be any different?

Until the adults in our society grow up and place sexual activity in its correct place, we will continue to suffer (finacially, morally, spiritually and culturally) from the results of unwanted pregnancies, unwanted children, and single-mother families.

Millions and million of adult Americans place their selfish desires for physical pleasure ahead of their responsibilities to young people.

Bob Munck,

where did you get the idea that there are 38 million teenagers in America. Such errors lend themselves to justifying discounting everything you post

eddie too 3:27 PM EST
"where did you get the idea that there are 38 million teenagers in America. Such errors lend themselves to justifying discounting everything you post"

I looked at the "population by age group" tables of the US Census Bureau. I don't see how that using them as my source would discount everything I post.

Abstinence works 100%
every time it's practiced. Let's face it, contraception isn't working and we have the facts to prove it in unwanted pregnancies and abortions. This despite the ease of access and education on contraceptives. Amazing how anti-abstinence zealots cannot connect the dots.

Save The Sex For Marriage
Sex is for married couples (and sadly I have to now clarify that that means one man and one woman), period. It's called making love, and to refresh all our memories, it's primary purpose is for the procreation of life.

Indeed, the Catholic Church had held their position on contraception from the start (yes, that means since the days of Jesus and the Apostles!). Every other Christian denomination also banned all forms of artificial birth control up until the 1930's. Then, one by one, they all crumbled and gave in to the desires of man. So what changed over time: God's law or man's law?

Read Pope Paul's encyclical Humanae Vitae from 1968 and be amazed with the predictions he made 40 years ago and how they are all coming true.

As he pointed out, a society that contracepts will ultimately cave in on itself. If birth control is used then people think that with sex there are no repercussions and so they desire and participate in more sex. Then, uh oh, something goes wrong, a condom breaks or a pill is forgotten and now a human life has begun to form in the woman. (Did we forget that that was the primary purpose of the "marital" act?) So now what does the couple do: abort the innocent child, raise it out of wedlock, force a marriage to provide a mommy and a daddy? No easy solutions and some downright deadly ones.

No, as one of the righty moonbats, I say, remain chaste and pure and save the sex for marriage. It can be done and for the good of the person and the benefit of society, it should be done.

For much more information and to see and understand all the benefits of Natural Family Planning, check out the Couple to Couple League at http://www.ccli.org.

Don't forget STDs
There’s one other element to this discussion, STDs. The more teens feel they can have sex without consequences, the more likely they are to have multiple partners. They move from one relationship into the next. This increases their exposure to STDs. All reports on this matter show a rise in STDs among teens. The latest findings by the CDC are showing that one out of four sexually active teenage females has a STD. (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336749,00.html)

It’s also important not to dismiss the emotional element involved in a sexual relationship. Many teens are not mature enough to deal with the emotional pain of a sexual relationship gone bad. Contraceptive advocates only want to deal with one issue—unintended pregnancies, instead of dealing with the entire adolescent where his/her physical health, emotional well being and dare I say, “soul” are taken into account.

Those who support abstinence education are forever being accused of having their heads in the sand, when they are the only ones looking at the well being of the whole child and taking all aspects into account. You can’t even get a teen to make her bed every day, but you’re going to trust her to remember to take birth control pills? And the pro-contraceptive advocates call us unrealistic!

The key words here are:
“One in 12 women taking the Pill gets pregnant each year because they miss so many tablets. …."

It is misleading to say the pill doesn't work. It is a very effective way to prevent pregnancy, when used correctly! The problem is idiots who don't use it properly. Saying misleading nonsense like the title of this article is like what the gun control advocates propose about crime. It's people, not guns, that kill people (Yay to the Heller case-we're free in DC!).

This author's whole premise is silly. What would you suggest as a better alternative to properly teaching teenagers the correct use of contraception, especially in light of the rates of their sexual activity? Don't say that abstinence BS. These kids are going to do it. More than the contraception, they should be advocating condom use, since the pill and those hormone shots do not prevent VD at all.

All the so-called pro-lifers seem to be against sex ed and contraceptives. Seems pretty stupid if you want less abortions to occur.

Bad old days
Hey, let's go back to the days of a pregnancy a year and childbirth as a frequent cause of death! Heightened infant mortality too! And let's throw in death from back-alley abortions!

The pill, if used properly, is extremely effective. Of course, it's always good for researchers to develop birth control methods that are easier to use.

One of the best things that ever happened to women was the means to control their fertility. And I love children--they'll have a better life if they're planned and wanted.

Bob Munck,

you must have read the tables wrong. There are about 4 million live births per year. There are seven teenage years. Four times seven equals 28 million teenagers at any given time.

"Love" vs Sex
The author states, "We have created a culture of “use and be used,” instead of “love and be loved.” Herein lies a lot of the problem. Many teen girls have bought into the "making love" mantra. They believe that they are "proving their love" to their boyfriend, that their relationship is more than superficial, or that in order to receive love they must "make love". It is about time that parents level with their kids-- it is having sex, not "making love" although it may be a part of a loving act. Sex is pleasurable and natural; however, without protection against pregnancy when one doesn't wish to be so, it is sheer stupidity to believe you won't be the one who gets pregnant. Trying to impress upon your kids that the only reason you and your spouse ever had sex was to beget them or to demonstrate your deep love for one another is like trying to convince them that Santa Claus is a real person. Level with them---tell them you think sex is great for any number of reasons including your own selfish ones. Then tell them that they would have to be nuts to share such an intimate act with someone they would never consider as their future spouse and parent of their children because the reality is just this: If you have a child with someone you can be certain that you will, in some way, remain connected to that person for the rest of your life. There is no escaping this truth. And, because this is so, it is imperative that any young woman must have choices from termination to adoption as she, and those who love her, agree is appropriate for HER. No child deserves to be born as a burden or penalty for the sins of its parents.

Someone missed the mark...
MerryColin is obviously confused. She says that no child deserves to be born as a burden or penalty for the sins of its parents. Since when is LIFE a penalty? Why should a child be denied life for the "sins" (mistake is really a better word) of their parents is a far better question to ask. Sex is great for many reasons, she is right, but it leads to children; that's simply a fact. And if a young girl is so concerned about being "burdened" by an unplanned pregnancy for having sex...don't have sex. It's that simple. People who can abstain from sex because they don't want to get pregnant often have much healthier relationships anyways. There are so many other ways to show someone you love them besides sex.

Caligula
Anyone who names himself after a monster wno happened to be a caesar has no credibility to begin with. Caligula murdered his adoted son, squandered a fortune on entertainment and building projects, banished or tortured his relatives, had people killed while he ate, declared himself god, made his favorite horse consul and was finally assassinated. No--I don't believe you have anything to add to a conversation on birth control!

Disingenuous Reasoning
Why is it that almost every liberal who comments on this says something like "Well, they're going to do it anyway, so..." as if that is a reason to call good and defend or explain away whatever "it" is? This adolescent reasoning would declare as acceptable every bad attitude and behavior.

Do you believe that with regard to speeding? Unchecked automotive and factory emissions? Smoking in public buildings? Well, hey, people are going to speed, might as well teach them how to handle a car at 60mph in a school zone. Oh, he killed someone? Well, he must have just not handled the car right.

And don't even try to imply that one's sexual behavior has no impact on others. Does anyone really believe that nonsense? Out of wedlock births, abortions, contraception, etc. all have huge financial and social costs -- we are supposed to just get used to and support this behavior? Sex is both personal and social and its effects are both obviously visible and hidden beneath the surface. Please stop this idiotic and embarrassing rationalizing.

Right on Man!
Steve,

Excellent points and excellent analogies. You are so right.

What sort of nonsense is this?
The Pill "doesn't work very well"...if you don't take it on schedule? Well, condoms don't work very well if you don't wear one, and a diaphragm doesn't work very well if you leave it in your dresser drawer!

While we're on the "subject," a handgun is no protection against home invasion if you keep it locked in a save and can't remember the combination.

There is an excellent case to be made for changing our approach to sex education -- in particular, for encouraging young people and singles to be much more responsible about their sexual behavior -- but it has nothing to do with the efficacy of existing contraceptive methods when they're used as they're DESIGNED to be used.

If Ms. Morse was a Sex Symbol
No pills would ever be needed.
Abstinence would not need to be encouraged.
Old people used to be young, but now they are old and try to influence the young to do the right thing.
Abstinence is the most natural and eco-friendly way to prevent unwanted childbirth.
Water treatment plants cannot effectivly difuse the future levels of artificial hormones(estrogen/progesterone) and pharmaceuticals(viagra) dumped into the water supply by "the pill's" advocates.
If people are against one pill that prevents the natural result of sex in the youth, how can they not rally in the same way against a pill that makes the old people want to hump like bunnies?
Is either a natural thing?(Hugh Hefner and Britney Speers cannot be used as examples.)




Ring Around the Pose-its
Lots of interesting concepts and assumptions are being bandied around here, and we’ll just keep going in circles if we don’t address them. The crux seems to be related to “freedom” of thought and behavior as guaranteed in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. However, Benjamin Franklin commented back in those early days of the nation that the concept of these freedoms only made sense if applied to a society of people of faith. Without that foundation or basis, the distinction between responsible exercise of freedom and licentiousness (his word) would become unclear. As they say, “if he were alive today, he’d roll over in his grave” to see that his warning has not been heeded.

I’d like to address the “marriage is for procreation” comment, for that undermines any ensuing argument about the sanctity of marriage. (How can we justify childless couples or those beyond or incapable of childbirth?) Sexual relations are not just a physical coupling of the two individuals; beyond this an emotional, psychological, and spiritual bonding occurs. Couples in a deeply committed relationship will testify to how each feels “completed” through the relationship with the other. Thus, the term “my better half” or “my other half” is used. Offspring are a physical manifestation of that bonding, but that completion of self, when two become as one, is the key aspect desired and needed even by those couples unable to produce such progeny.

Soul Searching
Another assumption is the “they’re going to do it anyhow” attitude. Of course, parents don’t want their children to engage in a variety of intimate relationships. Why is that?

Often, fiction is very close to the mark, and we can learn much about ourselves by taking an objective look at a distance. If the sexual experience is a sharing of our soul with another, such sharing with multiple partners diminishes the integrity and stability of that soul. Note the character Valdemort in the Harry Potter series, who has split his soul into several parts. The attempt at multiple lives and longevity of at least one has merely resulted in a diminished life for him. Of course, that is just fantasy, but do we see an important principle at work? This might be worth considering.

The answer of course is not just because the parents want to control the lives of their children. However, when a single parent is sleeping around with a variety of potential long-term partners or “separated” partners behave thusly because abstinence is hard to maintain once one has tasted the fruits of love, then the teens see the hypocrisy of the “party line” being forced upon them. Without positive role models, it’s not going to work. If parents take a “don’t do it” stance and then have a bucket of condoms in the cupboard for their teens to use without feeling judged, the hypocrisy of that position is equally evident. . When we take a “You shouldn’t do it, but I will understand if you do” attitude, that’s the same as saying “maybe” when we mean “no” and the children reading it as “yes.” The problem is that the media portrays casual sex as “normal” and even necessary in a healthy lifestyle

created in God's image
Loved Tom's comments!!! Abstinence education is a means to help young people realize who they are and expose the lies that they see all around them. When I was a teen, there was more pressure to abstain than to have sex-now it is so much more the other way around. If someone truly loves you, he/she will probably wait. If not, move on.
I join the ranks of the righty moonbats. I love my brothers and sisters of the world and I especially want to make the world an easier more beautiful place for our younger brothers and sisters! Chaste and pure is the way to go.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.