Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Jennifer Roback Morse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Not His Magnum Opus
by Jennifer Roback Morse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



Cartoonist Berkeley Breathed composed a truly revolting edition of “Opus,” just one week before Fathers Day. The cartoon published Sunday June 10 was appalling not only for its unadulterated, unapologetic male-bashing. The cartoon is also a sickening foretaste of what awaits us as same sex parenting becomes normalized.

The cartoon in question shows three characters talking about a boy in their class who has two moms, and no dad. They speculate, “Makes you wonder how he’ll do without a male role model in the house.” The last panel supplies the visual answer. A misogynist, inebriated white male throws a TV out the window, while swearing at a baseball player. We can easily infer the answer to the kids’ speculation: Kids are better off without fathers, since fathers are drunken, violent slobs.

You wouldn’t think so much power could be contained in a single panel of a cartoon strip. But look at the image of the man: he is holding a can, probably a beer can. He is unshaven and has a cigarette hanging out of his mouth. He is wearing a cap that has bikini barely covering a pair of orbs that suggest women’s breasts. Woman-hating. Drunk. Smoker. Barbarous. Unkempt. Yes, any child would be better off with two mothers.

This is a direct fall-out from the drive to normalize same sex parenting. Making same sex parenting equally acceptable as opposite sex parenting requires that the public believe that mothers and fathers are interchangeable. A child will do equally well with two mommies, two daddies or one of each. This is the official position of the entire coalition that supports same sex parenting.

Yet the more successful they are at convincing people that mothers and fathers are indistinguishable, the more people will conclude that fathers are disposable. This is for two reasons. First, the connection between fathers and children is intrinsically more tenuous than the bond between mothers and children. The social purpose of marriage is to strengthen the attachment of fathers to their children, as David Blankenhorn’s book, The Future of Marriage so ably shows. In a world in which mothers and fathers are considered indistinguishable, it is fathers who will be discarded.

Second, our social universe has already marginalized fathers from the family. The feminist movement teaches that men are unnecessary. Inculcating the belief that mothers and fathers are perfect substitutes can only accelerate that trend. The microscopic number of gay male couples who adopt are not going to interrupt that. No one will look at a pair of men parenting a child and say to themselves, “You see, it is just as I have always suspected. Children don’t need mothers.” Yet that is exactly the conclusion people draw from a pair of lesbians raising children together.

Which brings us back to Opus the Penguin. Berkeley Breathed wanted his readers to draw the conclusion that men are unnecessary and fathers are dispensable. I beg to differ. Kids thrive when they live with their own fathers, married to their mothers. Social science has definitively proven this point. I am running a feature on my website right now called What Dads Do. Men and women alike have been writing in to me, describing the irreplaceable contributions that their fathers have made in their lives, or that their husbands have made to the lives of their children. This vulgar cartoonist has no business trashing an entire class of people.

This is anti-male hate speech. If you doubt this, try reversing the images. Suppose he had drawn a cartoon featuring an innocent white male, minding his own business off-stage. Suppose he then showed an unattractive, stereotypical lesbian or gay man. The Lambda Legal Society would go ballistic.

It is time for women who love men to go ballistic. No doubt, many embittered women will complain that all men are exactly as the cartoonist depicted them. For every one of those women, there are easily five or more who appreciate the contributions the men in their lives have made to their families. I know that I don’t appreciate the implicit attack on my husband, my father, my brothers, and my brothers-in-law. These fine men serve their families and protect the weak.

Women, we need to take action. I wrote a letter to the editor of my local paper, urging that they discontinue Opus. I urge all of you to do the same.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D., is the author of Smart Sex: Finding Life-long Love In A Hook-up World. She blogs at jennifer-roback-morse.blogspot.com

Be the first to read Jennifer Morse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Gotta admit something here:
I think the cartoon was despicable. But (you knew it was coming...)
I would be happier seeing a cartoon BLASTING a gay couple. NOT because I'm a homophobe, but because that IS the American way. It IS free speech. It IS what our MILITARY fights and dies for.

And, as much as I TRUELY BELIEVE in free speech, I will NOT sanction taking ANYONES right to it. AND WILL FIGHT TO THE DEATH MY RIGHT TO IT!

The saddest part, to me, was that the Islamic cartoon row was NOT STARtED here in the USA!

Unintended Message
It's certainly a cartoon that argues against a child having two fathers. If a kid is f&%#@d up by the presence of one man, then two must mean twice the damage. Since there is a greater population of gay men than lesbian women, there should be some outcry from that community.

Man-haters raising future men
In two-mommy families, I often wonder what the lesbian women teach their sons about their role as men. Do they teach them that they are superfluous, useless, possibly even dangerous?

Intolerance
When Molly Ivins' column (liberal) used to appear (she has now died) in my local paper I would often see letters (from conservatives) to the editor demanding that the paper discontinue her column because, being critical of the Bush administration, it was offensive to conservatives. However, in many years of reading that paper, I have never seen a single letter from a reader (liberal) demanding that the paper discontinue Charles Krauthammer or any other conservative journalist. It seems typical of conservatives to demand the silencing of any point of view with which they disagree.

People who threaten to discontinue their subscription or their advertising are announcing their intolerance of diverse opinion: "Do it my way or get out of town".

Did Opus represent a heterosexual father who appeared to be drunken, abusive, and stupid? We have all known such. Huckleberry Finn's father was just like that and he's a major character in American literature.

Did Opus try to normalize homosexual parenting? I hope so, because some counterbalance is needed to attitudes of bigotry and hatred which must be terribly painful for homosexuals and their families.

Not long ago we heard of bloodshed in Europe when Muslims were offended by a Danish cartoon. Is this the American way, to destroy the cartoon and cartoonist because of political difference?


To motherbelt
One way to satisfy your curiosity would be by getting to know some two-mommy families. Travel is broadening.

Opus...
I guess I'd be happier if more attention was paid to the sorts of male-bashing that happens on a daily basis in family law courts and social services departments than in one Berk Breathed cartoon which struck me as being more criticising spectator sports viewers and beer drinkers than men in particular.

BAN, BAN, BAN IT... the New American Way
"...I wrote a letter to the editor of my local paper, urging that they discontinue Opus..."

My Dear, you sound like one of them there Liberals who want to ban Free Speech.

I remember the calls to have his cartoons banned 30-years-ago because of his stance on the Vietnam War.

Actually I thought the cartoon was quite funny.

Seriously though; if you want to ban anyting then please the washing-powder ads. They insult the whole family - the kids are scruffy morons without an ounce of common sense, the father a lazy idiot with the grin of a retard and the mother a neurotic, "Oh God, it's got to be whiter-than-white or no-one will love me" dingbat.

Lilly
Your point about your paper is funny. In my paper back home,and the Stars and Stripes I read over here I see the exact opposite. Liberal readers screaming (figuratively,it is a paper after all) to have the conservative columnist removed.

Lilly
Have you been on a secular college campus lately? Silencing the free speech of conservatives is the order of the day. If it were happening to liberals on campus you know that we would be treated to daily "sit-ins" or protests. Unfortunately conservatives are too busy actually studying and preparing to get a job to take the time for such things.
Are you also implying that lesbians are never drunken, abusive or stupid ? Or do reserve that description for dads?
Perhaps you need to hang out with more conservative christian dads. As you say, travel is broadening.

Lilly
First, I thought the fact there was no mother in either household in the cartoon was significant. I didn't take offense because I thought a missing mother as sad as a missing father.

Second, there are fewer liberals demanding the removal of columnists, etc. because fewer liberals actually read! Oh no! Actually, if you check the number of conservative books being sold versus the liberal and left-leaning, you will find the numbers support this statement!

Oops!
That should be "a missing parent."

Jennifer
Its a nice article and highlights what you and I (and seemingly few others here posting) realize intuitively, that its just hunky dory to blast men in any media. I disagree with you that the marginalization of fathers is a direct slippery slope result of gay marriage and parenting though.

I hasten to say i do not favor same sex parenting nor marriage, but the marginalization of men has marched on since well before same sex marriage was an open issue and will continue after it is settled one way or another. It is not contradictory to say they sell the notion that men and women are the same. No. Men are clearly considered far less.

No need to point out that it is men who are the morons on tv, men who are the punch line of jokes told in church, and men admonsihed on Fathers Day after just a couple months earlier literally worshiping at the alter of motherhood for Moms day. Read marriage advice, or if you've ever attended marriage counceling, the underlying theme is that men need to learn to commicate like women, lietn to problems and not try and fix them, empathize etc. Church sermons say the same. Men need to feeeeeeelllll more and act less. Imagine if men actually took that advice and if men all became communicators exactly like they are being told. To test a premise take it to the extreme. If it fails there, then its application becomes subjective, and "rules" cannot be subjective for then who gets to decide. Man comes home, wife is crying, he asks why, she says she plugged too many cords to the power strip in the home office and started a small fire.

A. He sits on the couch cuddling a big white ceramic mug of tea (you know how thay always portray the gals doing it), legs tucked under and a heavy blanket wrapped around him, facing his wife, and says, "Im so sorry you feel bad about doing that. Ive done that and i know how it made me feel. Let me rub your shoulders and you tell me all about your day.

B. Man goes and makes sure fire is out.


This is relevant because it is within this dichotomy of communication that the origins of misandry reside. We are not being told men and women are the same. We are being told that men will have value when they become more like women.

This cartoon is offensive but I could give a rip if its published. Those points about complaints to newspapers show just how ignorant most people are to this anti-male problem. Most people glaze over during discourse on gender, thinking well Im ok so stop whining. Meanwhile boys are expelled for "shooting" imaginary guns made from nothing but the shape of their fingers, boys are forced to make colorful crafts and write soft poetry, and attend anger management and conflict resolution. Boys are taught that the girls are smarter and more mature, and that by paying attention and acting more like the girls they will catch up.

Jennifer, please make the issue misandry, not same sex marriage. That same cartoon could have easily appeared w/ the mom being single (divorced) the result of unilateral divorce and the man shown metaphorically standing in for the creep she dumped.

Conservatives with respect for men, and especially Christians, need to get off the same sex marriage hysteria and get on the marriage issue in the general.

My Dad Was Bad--And Irreplaceable!
A few points I'm thinking about:

*This kind of thinking, talking yourself into believing in the "whatever" concept of childraising, is connected to the peace movement. No father to fight a daily battle to protect and provide for his children, and no men to fight for the strength and safety of this country. "Whatever!"

*My dad is an alcoholic. He was rude to my mom, but then again she was no saint--she just looked like it sometimes. They're still rude and crude and I don't live that way. In today's world, my parents would have gotten divorced. But in the past world, which could still be emulated, my dad stayed around and raised us. Yelled at us, smacked our butts, true. I love my dad so much. He taught me not to smoke, he taught me not to drink and get belligerent, he dug up tuition money to send me to college, he taught me how it sucks to be treated like you're just a little girl, easily discounted. So I now try to treat people as visible and worthy of respect.

*Those who insinuate that a less-than-Mike-Brady dad isn't important to his offspring are just ignorant. They've believed what their college professors told them, like swallowing the coolaid at Jonestown and laying down for the sake of the ego of those who just won't grow up out of their "I hate you daddy" Marxist phase.

*They're doing it out of pity for kids who are different, who don't have a mom and dad. "Look. I had a mom and a dad together, but that doesn't mean my family was better than your single mom and your welfare. Really. Look at me. I'm terrible."

*They want the world to shape itself to them and aren't willing to let life make demands on their childish fancies. That makes everyone a loose fragment.

*Terrorists are a whole united cancer cell. We are a weak host.

Lilly: Really?
lilly writes: Tuesday, June, 12, 2007 6:52 AM
Intolerance
When Molly Ivins' column (liberal) used to appear (she has now died) in my local paper I would often see letters (from conservatives) to the editor demanding that the paper discontinue her column because, being critical of the Bush administration, it was offensive to conservatives. However, in many years of reading that paper, I have never seen a single letter from a reader (liberal) demanding that the paper discontinue Charles Krauthammer or any other conservative journalist. It seems typical of conservatives to demand the silencing of any point of view with which they disagree.

+ I would hardly compare the thoughts of an erudite, philosophically-conservative, Harvard medical school graduate like Dr. Krauthammer w/ the populist rants of a man-hater like the late Ms. Ivins. Though I think that Ms. Ivins many sins would not automatically relegate her to the infernal regions, I would also not extend her the courtesy of not speaking ill of the recently deceased. Ms. Ivins apparently warned us about the perils of the “Military Industrial Complex”, yet was a big advocate of the “Welfare Industrial Complex” ($1.4T per year) while ignoring it’s associated issues: U.S. Society’s slavish devotion toward providing for the emotional, physical & financial well-being of its virtuous female electorate: artificially enhanced lifespan, no-fault divorce (i.e., alimony, child custody, etc.), affirmative action/quotas, VAWA, welfare state, Title XI, taxpayer-funded abortion on demand in perpetuity, a progressive taxation system that penalizes men while financing said female-specific welfare industrial complex, etc. Society survival is secondary. And you wonder why the Islamic militants have such contempt for the United States.

+Wit? Humor? Feminist entitlement ad nauseam is hardly erudite. I think that her perpetual criticism of Bush the younger stems primarily from a subconscious realization that decisive men like GW do not in principle grant blanket deferment to the infantile whims of women like Ms. Ivins, merely because they provide life-support for a functioning uterus. Primarily because men like GW shouldn’t take women-children like Ms. Ivins too seriously.

+Nuanced thought? As I recall the late Ms. Ivins pontificated in a column about the fact that she barely earned six-figures a year, despite being an internationally-renowned pundit & then segued into the old Marxist canard of income being based upon one’s “intrinsic value” to Society. Unfortunately Neo-Marxism is as nuanced as a sledgehammer.

+I think that Ms. Ivins will be, like Ms. Friedan, cast upon the “ash heap of history” as first-rate personalities (and part time plagiarists) supporting second-rate intellects.

People who threaten to discontinue their subscription or their advertising are announcing their intolerance of diverse opinion: "Do it my way or get out of town".

+ AS opposed to those embodiments of hyphenated-American tolerance who got Don Imus fired over some insightful observations concerning a group of street thugs, i.e., the Rutger’s women’s basketball team? Which ideology has firmly established “hate speech” codes on most university campuses IOT silence criticism of the mainstream neo-Marxist paradigm? Which party, now in control of Congress, is currently talking about the end of “Talk Radio” (and other alternatives to the Pro-Left MSM) via the imposition of the so-called “Fairness Doctrine?”

Did Opus represent a heterosexual father who appeared to be drunken, abusive, and stupid? We have all known such. Huckleberry Finn's father was just like that and he's a major character in American literature.

+The character in question is Steve Dallas, the stereotypical , anti-PC, WASP, Ivy League-educated lawyer who has been the focus of most of Mr. Breathed’s “self-loathing white male” ire since “Bloom County”, the precursor to OPUS. OPUS is the penguin. Try to familiarize yourself w/ subject before offering an opinion. WRT abuse: Now we have women abusing “No- Fault Divorce”: women apply for 80% of all divorces while utilizing children as financial assets IOT leverage the largest amount of de facto Alimony: i.e., child support. Women are just as likely to engage in domestic violence: Men may hit hard but women hit first. Now we have women committing paternity fraud (1-25% of all married women) and forcing their husbands to pay for some else’s children. Given their child custody monopoly, now we have mothers committing 70% of all child abuse. Now we have women using abortion as de facto birth control that results in 25 % of all children currently conceived (1.4M) being aborted for pure convenience. Which is the truly abusive gender?

Did Opus try to normalize homosexual parenting? I hope so, because some counterbalance is needed to attitudes of bigotry and hatred which must be terribly painful for homosexuals and their families.

+Wow. Being a hyphenated-American female must grant you w/ an esoteric insight into your mutual memberships in parallel government-sanctioned victim groups. Why don’t you all get together and try to “out-victim” one another.

Not long ago we heard of bloodshed in Europe when Muslims were offended by a Danish cartoon. Is this the American way, to destroy the cartoon and cartoonist because of political difference?

+ Please don’t equate public criticism w/ Islamofacist bloodshed. It’s called “moral equivalence” & such thinking is indicative of a truly pedestrian intellect. Freedom of speech doesn’t equate to freedom from criticism. Just because everyone has an opportunity to be an idiot in public forum doesn’t provide protection from being called an “idiot” in the same public forum. Most ration people don’t advocate Mr. Breathed’s removal. I personally think that the comic is another example of Mr. Breathed’s PC “self-loathing white male” philosophy that he has exhibited in numerous previous comic strips. Such thinking is just a “drop in the bucket” WRT society’s institutionalized Antipathy to men in general and the white, heterosexual male in particular.



osthode: Auggie
The boy, Auggie, is the product of an past one-night stand between the ostensible cad, Steve Dallas, and a "free-spirit." She subsequently, had the kid & raised him w/o Steve's knowledge. One day she apparently decided to dump the kid in Steve's lap. Steve is attempting, however unsuccessfully, to be a single father.

Psychobabble contortions
Go back to the original panels of the cartoon ... “Makes you wonder how he’ll do without a male role model in the house.”

Implicit in that statement is a bigotry that a child being raised by two mothers, even if they're working really really hard at it, will be somehow getting a worse family experience than a child in a traditional household.

We all know traditional households where the father works 80 hour weeks. Where the father spends more free time fishing or golfing with friends than raising kids. Where the father - or mother - are far less than an ideal 'role model'. Where the father has had to spend years in an overseas job to help the family make ends meet.

Parenting is hard work, no matter who's in the role. I saw the cartoon as just pointing that out. For 16 or 18 or 20 years, you've gotta be "on" a lot of the time you'd rather be doing something else. If you're not, you shouldn't be having kids in the first place.

balconesfault
Go back to the original panels of the cartoon ... “Makes you wonder how he’ll do without a male role model in the house.”

*** are you reading the same thing that everyone else is?

Implicit in that statement is a bigotry that a child being raised by two mothers, even if they're working really really hard at it, will be somehow getting a worse family experience than a child in a traditional household.

*** that statement was sarcastioally and perhaps ironically pointing out that the kid with two mommies will undoubtably be better off not having a male role model. that is what people are calling this out for. the cartoon used one of the worst stereotypes of male behavior (violent, dirty, boorish) as the comparison to a dual-mom situation. why not just compare apples to apples? oh, then the sarcasm and irony would not have worked.


We all know traditional households where the father works 80 hour weeks. Where the father spends more free time fishing or golfing with friends than raising kids. Where the father - or mother - are far less than an ideal 'role model'. Where the father has had to spend years in an overseas job to help the family make ends meet.

*** again comparing negative (albeit less so than the cartoon) to...

Parenting is hard work, no matter who's in the role. I saw the cartoon as just pointing that out. For 16 or 18 or 20 years, you've gotta be "on" a lot of the time you'd rather be doing something else. If you're not, you shouldn't be having kids in the first place

*** I dont think that was the point the cartoonist was trying to make. and neither did most of the others (as evidenced pro and con by the posters here) think that.

It's Only A Cartoon
Why is it that people get worked up into a tizzy over a cartoon stereotype? People get tired of watching television shows that show men as stupid oafs. Shut the damned thing off. If enough people do that, the greedy SOB's who run the mass media start to lose money. This forces changes. Even if it doesn't work immediately, you are better off for not exposing yourself to that swill. Do a better job of raising the kids you have and of working out a viable marriage despite the efforts of the pagans running our country and its media. Civilization is saved one person at a time, not by public policy or bitching about pagan idiocy.

If This Is Brittle...
Clearly, you have never met Berkeley Breathed. I have as recently as last month at a book signing, and let me assure you, he has a loving wife and two wonderful little children (which I had the pleasure sitting next to.) Perhaps you are being just as bad as those feminists who attacked him for witting a children's book about how a mother will sacrifice herself for her children.
Oh, FYI, If you can become brittle over this issue, I'd hate to see what would happen if you ever stumbled over a Japanese comic book (aka Manga.) Some stories feature same-sex couples, both boys and girls, sometimes teenaged.
Okay, have you had your heart attack yet? If not, two words: Tentacle Porn.
Honestly, you have a lot of issues.
Sincerely (or not),
Lawrence

Berk Breathed's Despicable Comic Strip
This is for all of you folks here who apparently DON'T GET IT. (You know who you are!)

Evidently, you think it is morally acceptable to engage in male-bashing - and father-bashing in particular. You think it is perfectly OKAY to do this; you lack the moral wisdom to see anything wrong or harmful or dangerous about this.

Yes, that is precisely what it amounts to: what Berk Breathed has given to the world is hate propaganda pure and simple! And you folks who don't see what the problem is, are PART OF the problem. You are COMPLICIT in the problem, and you must assume your share of blame when the final tally is reckoned.

Get it?

There are no shades of gray about this; no moral ambiguities. We need to consider the present socio-political CONTEXT, guys!

That's right, the big "C" word. CONTEXT!! There is a gender war going on, instigated by radical feminist agitation over the last 40 years...and it ain't funny! It's no joke! Male-bashing is deadly serious business, and getting worse, and the future implications for society are not pretty!

All hail, Berk Breathed, for pouring benzine on the fire! What a guy..what a guy!

Still Brittle...
So, apparently, Homer Simpson, Peter Griffin, Al Bundy and all the other bad dads on TV are some sort of stereotype in the media. Apparently, you never met my father, who makes them all look like the dad from "Father Knows Best". Sorry to spoil it for you, but that type of father figure does exist. All I suggest is that you learn from their mistakes and don't repeat them. I love my father deeply, yet I won't make the same mistakes he made, namely being a prize fighter and trying to hold up a bank in his youth. Makes Homer Simpson look like a patron saint in my opinion.

No, Tough-minded.
What B.B. created in his comic strip is exactly that: a stereotype in the media. But if you plan to create a stereotype, why not base it upon something that is more truly "typical". And what the cartoon presents is NOT the "typical" father.

No. Any way that you slice it, Berk Breathed's creation is a vicious SLUR not only upon fathers, but indirectly upon all males.

In short, it is male-bashing.

And in the present political CONTEXT, male-bashing is simply not acceptable. We have a social crisis going on, and I will say it again: This Pours Benzine On The Fire.

You would think that a sensitive, politically hip guy like B.B. would KNOW that, however....

...I think that B.B. is nothing but a politically correct weasel. Either that or phenomenally thick-headed. (Neither of which gets him off the hook!)

To assert that such father figures *do exist* is merely an evasive strawman argument. Nobody disputes that such people exist; however, that is completely beside the point. The question is not *whether* such people exist, but whether it is conscionable to promote a vicious, destructive stereotype about men and fathers. If B.B. published a comic strip depicting black people as lazy, stupid watermelon-eating gangstas, you can bet that millions of readers would be howling for his blood.... wouldn't they? You could undoubtedly find individual black people who might fit that description, but Berk Breathed wouldn't DARE put it in a comic strip...would he?

But he didn't do that. Instead, he did something MORALLY EQUIVALENT but a hundred times more sneaky - this time aimed at men and fathers. And there is NO EXCUSE for what he did!

NO EXCUSE!!!

The feminist-instigated cultural war against men and fathers is real, it is no joke, and this little gesture by Berk Breathed, so tastelessly timed to fall near Father's Day, sums up to to a propaganda smear whether Berk consciously intended it that way or not.

Personally, I think this indicates that B.B. has a moral conscience the size of a raisin.

Well written!!!
Fidelbogen, you did a wonderful job articulating some the the PC crazinest that exists in our society. Good for you!!!!!

Authority
To All of You, God's Children:

May God look down on us discussing these issues and smile.

I believe the root of these issues to be based in whether we accept the authority of God as expressed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.

Chapter Two of Genesis speaks of Paradise. We may wish to remember that Paradise was perfect before the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was eaten. In Paradise before the fall, Adam and Eve were in a state of perfect righteousness, thus one could say God's perfect creation can be seen in Genesis Chapter Two.

We may wish to note that there were only two people in the beginning: one male and one female. The two were spouses and eventually had relations and gave birth to children per later chapters of Genesis. It is not a coincidence that in the perfect place, Paradise, sexual relations involved one man and one woman committed to raising their children together. One could say, this is not a mere coincidence, but a movement of the Holy Spirit.

Genesis Two is not a story of Adam and Steve, nor is it a story of Madame and Eve. Adam and Eve are the parents of all of humanity and we can look to their perfect state in Paradise to see how we were designed by God to live and love.

We have free will and the power to live how we choose. When we choose to live according to God's plan, we will hopefully enter the "New Paradise" at the Second Coming of Jesus mentioned in Revelations.

People who accept the authority of God as taught by the Roman Magisterium in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition will accept these Biblical assertions. Those who do not believe in the authority of the teaching arm of the Roman Catholic Church, could possibly come up with different interpretations of the Bible and also could possibly be choosing to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Doing so is to try to give humans authority and to make humans gods. (Belief that the Catholic Church has preserved the deposit of faith is another detailed topic that I will set aside in this message, yet is precisely at the root of this discussion.)

I end where I began: I believe the root of these issues to be based in whether we accept the authority of God as expressed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.

This is the real discussion when we get down to the beginning/root of our discussion. It is in the beginning of the discussion and the beginning of the Bible where I believe we should focus our energies when seeking unity. By shifting our focus to belief or disbelief of God's authority, we discover whether our discussions are futile or not.

Humans, acting under their own authority, will never agree because each human has a slightly different value system. Humans, acting under the authority of Sacred Scipture and Sacred Tradition, will have one voice, the voice of God.

What I am seeing on this post seems to be angry human banter. If we want to truly love one another, whether in spousal relations, or in rearing children, or in online blogging, I believe we need to love by following the way of loving that has been revealed to us by God. The Bible and the Church are beautiful gifts from God, much in the same way that each and every one who has responded to this blog is a wonderful gift from God. I love you all!

Amen.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.