Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Jennifer Roback Morse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Not His Magnum Opus
by Jennifer Roback Morse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Cartoonist Berkeley Breathed composed a truly revolting edition of “Opus,” just one week before Fathers Day. The cartoon published Sunday June 10 was appalling not only for its unadulterated, unapologetic male-bashing. The cartoon is also a sickening foretaste of what awaits us as same sex parenting becomes normalized.

The cartoon in question shows three characters talking about a boy in their class who has two moms, and no dad. They speculate, “Makes you wonder how he’ll do without a male role model in the house.” The last panel supplies the visual answer. A misogynist, inebriated white male throws a TV out the window, while swearing at a baseball player. We can easily infer the answer to the kids’ speculation: Kids are better off without fathers, since fathers are drunken, violent slobs.

You wouldn’t think so much power could be contained in a single panel of a cartoon strip. But look at the image of the man: he is holding a can, probably a beer can. He is unshaven and has a cigarette hanging out of his mouth. He is wearing a cap that has bikini barely covering a pair of orbs that suggest women’s breasts. Woman-hating. Drunk. Smoker. Barbarous. Unkempt. Yes, any child would be better off with two mothers.

This is a direct fall-out from the drive to normalize same sex parenting. Making same sex parenting equally acceptable as opposite sex parenting requires that the public believe that mothers and fathers are interchangeable. A child will do equally well with two mommies, two daddies or one of each. This is the official position of the entire coalition that supports same sex parenting.

Yet the more successful they are at convincing people that mothers and fathers are indistinguishable, the more people will conclude that fathers are disposable. This is for two reasons. First, the connection between fathers and children is intrinsically more tenuous than the bond between mothers and children. The social purpose of marriage is to strengthen the attachment of fathers to their children, as David Blankenhorn’s book, The Future of Marriage so ably shows. In a world in which mothers and fathers are considered indistinguishable, it is fathers who will be discarded.

Second, our social universe has already marginalized fathers from the family. The feminist movement teaches that men are unnecessary. Inculcating the belief that mothers and fathers are perfect substitutes can only accelerate that trend. The microscopic number of gay male couples who adopt are not going to interrupt that. No one will look at a pair of men parenting a child and say to themselves, “You see, it is just as I have always suspected. Children don’t need mothers.” Yet that is exactly the conclusion people draw from a pair of lesbians raising children together.

Which brings us back to Opus the Penguin. Berkeley Breathed wanted his readers to draw the conclusion that men are unnecessary and fathers are dispensable. I beg to differ. Kids thrive when they live with their own fathers, married to their mothers. Social science has definitively proven this point. I am running a feature on my website right now called What Dads Do. Men and women alike have been writing in to me, describing the irreplaceable contributions that their fathers have made in their lives, or that their husbands have made to the lives of their children. This vulgar cartoonist has no business trashing an entire class of people.

This is anti-male hate speech. If you doubt this, try reversing the images. Suppose he had drawn a cartoon featuring an innocent white male, minding his own business off-stage. Suppose he then showed an unattractive, stereotypical lesbian or gay man. The Lambda Legal Society would go ballistic.

It is time for women who love men to go ballistic. No doubt, many embittered women will complain that all men are exactly as the cartoonist depicted them. For every one of those women, there are easily five or more who appreciate the contributions the men in their lives have made to their families. I know that I don’t appreciate the implicit attack on my husband, my father, my brothers, and my brothers-in-law. These fine men serve their families and protect the weak.

Women, we need to take action. I wrote a letter to the editor of my local paper, urging that they discontinue Opus. I urge all of you to do the same.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D., is the author of Smart Sex: Finding Life-long Love In A Hook-up World. She blogs at jennifer-roback-morse.blogspot.com

Be the first to read Jennifer Morse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Authority
To All of You, God's Children:

May God look down on us discussing these issues and smile.

I believe the root of these issues to be based in whether we accept the authority of God as expressed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.

Chapter Two of Genesis speaks of Paradise. We may wish to remember that Paradise was perfect before the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was eaten. In Paradise before the fall, Adam and Eve were in a state of perfect righteousness, thus one could say God's perfect creation can be seen in Genesis Chapter Two.

We may wish to note that there were only two people in the beginning: one male and one female. The two were spouses and eventually had relations and gave birth to children per later chapters of Genesis. It is not a coincidence that in the perfect place, Paradise, sexual relations involved one man and one woman committed to raising their children together. One could say, this is not a mere coincidence, but a movement of the Holy Spirit.

Genesis Two is not a story of Adam and Steve, nor is it a story of Madame and Eve. Adam and Eve are the parents of all of humanity and we can look to their perfect state in Paradise to see how we were designed by God to live and love.

We have free will and the power to live how we choose. When we choose to live according to God's plan, we will hopefully enter the "New Paradise" at the Second Coming of Jesus mentioned in Revelations.

People who accept the authority of God as taught by the Roman Magisterium in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition will accept these Biblical assertions. Those who do not believe in the authority of the teaching arm of the Roman Catholic Church, could possibly come up with different interpretations of the Bible and also could possibly be choosing to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Doing so is to try to give humans authority and to make humans gods. (Belief that the Catholic Church has preserved the deposit of faith is another detailed topic that I will set aside in this message, yet is precisely at the root of this discussion.)

I end where I began: I believe the root of these issues to be based in whether we accept the authority of God as expressed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.

This is the real discussion when we get down to the beginning/root of our discussion. It is in the beginning of the discussion and the beginning of the Bible where I believe we should focus our energies when seeking unity. By shifting our focus to belief or disbelief of God's authority, we discover whether our discussions are futile or not.

Humans, acting under their own authority, will never agree because each human has a slightly different value system. Humans, acting under the authority of Sacred Scipture and Sacred Tradition, will have one voice, the voice of God.

What I am seeing on this post seems to be angry human banter. If we want to truly love one another, whether in spousal relations, or in rearing children, or in online blogging, I believe we need to love by following the way of loving that has been revealed to us by God. The Bible and the Church are beautiful gifts from God, much in the same way that each and every one who has responded to this blog is a wonderful gift from God. I love you all!

Amen.

Well written!!!
Fidelbogen, you did a wonderful job articulating some the the PC crazinest that exists in our society. Good for you!!!!!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.