Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Jeff Jacoby :: Townhall.com Columnist
Historical amnesia at the NAACP
by Jeff Jacoby
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


At an event in North Carolina to mark Black History Month last February, Julian Bond, the chairman of the NAACP, unleashed a blistering attack on the Bush administration and the Republican Party. Among other discourtesies, he compared President George W. Bush's judicial appointees to the Taliban and described former Attorney General John Ashcroft, not for the first time, as "J. Edgar Ashcroft."

"The Republican Party," Bond was reported as saying, "would have the American flag and the swastika flying side by side." (According to other reports, Bond said that the GOP's "idea of equal rights is the American flag and the Confederate swastika flying side-by-side.")

Such partisan bigotry from the chairman of a supposedly nonpartisan organization makes it easy to understand why for five years Bush refused to attend the NAACP's annual conventions. More of a mystery is why he changed his mind this year -- and why, rather than attempt to refute Bond's venomous caricature of his party, he seemed to accept it.

"I understand that many African-Americans distrust my political party," Bush said (to shouts of "Yes!" and applause from the audience, according to the White House transcript). "I consider it a tragedy that the party of Abraham Lincoln let go of its historic ties with the African-American community. For too long my party wrote off the African-American vote, and many African-Americans wrote off the Republican Party."

Republicans often take this rueful tone when talking about their party in the context of race. Democrats, who routinely get 85 percent or more of the black vote, never do. But the Republican rue isn't justified by the facts. Neither is the willingness of black voters to be taken for granted by Democrats.

Look around. Black candidates are serious contenders for governor in three states this year, and two of them -- Lynn Swann in Pennsylvania and Kenneth Blackwell in Ohio -- are Republicans. The third, Democrat Deval Patrick, is running in Massachusetts, a quintessentially blue state that has managed to elect only one African-American to statewide office in its entire history: former US Senator Edward Brooke -- a Republican.

Bush may have given short shrift to the NAACP for several years, but from his first day in office he has surrounded himself with a record number of senior black policy makers. Among them have been the nation's first black secretary of state, Colin Powell -- and its second, Condoleezza Rice.

Of course the Republican Party's record on race is not without its blemishes. For example, at a 100th birthday party for Strom Thurmond in 2002, Senator Trent Lott of Mississippi praised the former Dixiecrat's segregationist 1948 campaign for president. Republicans were scandalized and forced Lott to resign as Senate majority leader. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Jeff Jacoby is an Op-Ed writer for the Boston Globe, a radio political commentator, and a contributing columnist for Townhall.com. href="http://www.townhall.com/Secure/Signup.aspx">Sign up today

Be the first to read Jeff Jacoby's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Another thing on Redlining
It's tough being a realtor in racially polarized cities.

On one hand, if you show blacks [whites] the houses in black [white] neighborhoods, you can be accused of "racial profiling" and lose your license.

On the other hand, if you show blacks [whites] the houses in white [black] neighborhoods, the customer will ask, "Where are all the black folk [white people]?" and you might lose a customer.

Even if the customer doesn't complain, showing blacks [whites] the houses in white [black] neighborhoods, you might be accused of "block-busting," the practice of selling one house in the neighborhood to a minority in an attempt to drum up sales from the majority getting scared and deciding to leave.

It's kinda like anti-trust legislation. If your prices are below the competition, you're dumping, if higher, you're gouging, and if the same, you're colluding. No matter what price you pick somebody can slap a lawsuit on you.

Racism
LeftAngle:

Hilarious posts, by the way.

I spent 20 years in the Army and watched the complete integration and acceptance of all minorities into positions of power and responsibility. It was fun. Only losers played the race card and they usually got it rammed up their fundament.

I have since retired and gone into the private business community and have carried the attitudes that I developed in the Army to this endeavor. That attitude is "I don't care about your racial status, sex, religion, disability or anything else. Can you do the job? If so, great! If not, goodbye."

Affirmative action programs make the problems worse because they cause an undue awareness of race.

Would you say it is fair to set aside seats for Asian students? If not, why not? How about Hispanics? How about Arabs? How about Jews? How about whites?

If you said no to any of the above why is it right to set aside seats for blacks based merely on race?

Someone once said, and I agree, that when talking about race two questions should be asked.
1. What is your definition of racism?
2. How does that apply to this situation?

All in all, though, your left angle posts show the modern liberal attitude towards minorities. That is "They can't make it without help, the poor dears. So sad, they just can't.

What a load of crap.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.