Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Liberty First, Security Second
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

We learned haunting and currently relevant facts about our nation’s history while spending an early fall week in Williamsburg, Jamestown, and Yorktown.  For those who founded this nation, opportunity trumped concern for personal safety.  It staggers the imagination to think of people leaving the security of their familiar, comfortable homeland to build a new life for themselves in a strange and primitive land about which they knew almost nothing.  Just how harsh and forbidding the challenges of this endeavor would turn out to be is measured by the fact that by 1610, three years after the Jamestown settlement’s founding, only 60 out of 500 of them survived.  Such was the stuff our pioneer ancestors were made of, and such, as we know, drives the underprivileged from around the world today to reach far beyond their circumstances to realize their dream of a better life here in America.

Going Rogue by Sarah Palin FREE

We made day trips to both Jamestown and Yorktown, where the history was much older than in Williamsburg.

We were fortunate in that the Park Service ranger conducting our tour of Jamestown was knowledgeable, passionate, and enthusiastic about the many details of the life and trials of the first settlers.  I was particularly struck by the fact that, even in the face of all the problems, the Virginia Company succeeded in recruiting 90 women to make the voyage to the new land to join the surviving men and boys who had been in the first wave of settlers.  One of the rangers we heard discussing this in some detail was adamant in refuting the proffered explanation that these women had come to Virginia because they were too ugly to find a husband in England.  He offered as evidence that this was not the case the fact was that these intrepid ladies were all married within one year, despite the fact that the lucky men who succeeded in winning their hands (in the four- or five-to-one competition) still had to obtain permission to marry them from the Virginia Company (the prospective wife’s employer) and had to be prosperous enough to reimburse the company for the cost of their passage.  The ranger’s explanation for why these women braved the wilds of the New World was simple: coming from a working class background, they had little to no hope of marrying a man with land in England, while there was great opportunity to do just that in the colony, thereby improving her prospects and those of her children and grandchildren as well.

Our trip to Yorktown took us back some 150 years to the era of the American Revolution.  The fall weather was perfect and we ate lunch by the water’s edge at exactly the time of year that Washington, with the help of the French, had Cornwallis and the British army he commanded under siege in the very town where we sat.  This made it all the more interesting to imagine all the deadly action that was unfolding on that precise location exactly 228 years ago.

We know that the colonists were deeply divided between those who vowed to have “liberty or death” and the loyalists who did everything within their power — despite his tyranny — to keep the colonies under the security provided by the rule of King George, who controlled the awesome British army and navy.

Then, as now, those two competing interests — liberty and security — were locked in a furious contest whose outcome was far from certain at the time, and today that contest continues.  On one side stand those hardy, intrepid souls who prize what they see as their God-given liberty and the freedom by His grace to take on the challenges of life for themselves; on the other are those who yearn for big government to stand between them and the vicissitudes of life.

Believing that they were being aided by Divine Providence, Washington and his men persisted under the most cruel and daunting of conditions.  And they prevailed.  They “brought forth … a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”  And not equal in that all have the same amount of things, but equal in their right as God’s creations to make their own choices and seek their own opportunities.  The America for which those patriots bled and died has been a magnet, a beacon of hope ever since for all those around the world who yearn for liberty more than security.

Still just as the loyalists of the colonial period were content to live in subjugation to King George and the security — such as it was — that this entailed, so today, there are far too many in America who would tip the scales towards ever larger government, despite its curtailment of freedom, in hopes having the state make their future less harsh, problem-laden, and froth with uncertainty.

Sadly, they have not reckoned with the realities that led Jefferson to declare to James Madison (1787 – ME 6:391): “I am not a friend to a very energetic government.  It is always oppressive.” [emphasis mine]  Perhaps it is because they have not studied the clear lessons of history that “government big enough to supply everything you need, is big enough to take everything you have.”

Perhaps they cannot be bothered to care. 

But some of us care deeply.  We desire — no, like those early patriots, we insist on — a land where our children and grandchildren can enjoy the intoxicating taste of freedom.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
akagi
As far as technology goes, now is the best time to live in America. As far as a nation on the decline, however...

I suppose the oppressive nanny state, Muslim terrorism, an out-of-control crime rate, drug use, more and more pervs coming out of the woodwork, a general lack of civility, increasing factionalization of the country, lowering education standards, government corruption, unpatriotic malaise, and being played for fools on the world scene is MUCH better than a country that was safe, secure, knew where it stood and how to treat people- even if it had some notable problems.

And who said I'd like to live in the 1920's?

Again, with all those 13 year olds marrying grandpas- do you have any proof?

And the whole assimilation thing- if that's the same, why 12 million+ illegals?

Really, we've been chipping away at our solid foundation for years, and yet some just selectively ignore the warning signs and tell a near-terminal patient he's a-ok. Good luck with that. Hope you're right, but I doubt it.

P
Actually there was a great deal of 13 and 14-year olds marrying 40 year olds 150 years ago at the time.

"You paint America of yesteryear as no better or perhaps worse than today. Is that just being disingenuous or what you really believe?"

America today is much much much better than it was say 100 or 90 years ago. You didn't have the KKK helping draft legislation (where did you think the National Origins Act came from?), nor have thousands and thousands of members marching down Pennsylvania Avenue. In 1924, when the NOA was passed the Klan had over 6 million members and had either members of Congress, governors and the like as members or were directly responsible for their election (and then they did the Klan's bidding), there were wide spread violations of civil rights of blacks, the internment of 110,000 people based simply on their ethnic heritage, an oppressive system of segregation, various acts of outright imperialism and we could go on and on. Despite its problems the US is far far better than it was at any time in its history. I wouldn't want to live in the US in 1789 or 1925 nor would you.

"The difference in assimilation is that people wanted to be part of America; not simply get what they could from it."

Same as now.

"I swear, if we lived in Somalia some people would still say, "But it's not any better anywhere else..."

I doubt it, but you know in many areas the US is not the leader of the pack--just one example, Hong Kong and Singapore have more economic freedom. Singapore also spends far far less than the US does on healthcare.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.