Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, June 06, 2008
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
New CDC Study Shows Teens Continue Risky Behavior
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Prediction: Who will John McCain pick as his VP?








The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) just released its 2007 report “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance,” a nationally representative sample of 14,000 American students in grades 9-12 that includes national, state and local surveys.

The good news is that fewer teens engage in risky behavior. The bad news is that far too many of them still do!

Teens continue to have less sex: in the early 1990s, more than half of teens reported that they were no longer virgins, whereas in the CDC report for 2007, that number had dropped to only 48 percent. Equally important, fewer teens have had multiple sexual partners: in the early 90s, 19 percent reported having four or more partners, but in 2007 that number was only 15 percent. Sadly, fully 35 percent of high school students describe themselves as sexually active and almost 40 percent of them did not use a condom during their last intercourse.

Further, fewer teens are into drugs (marijuana use is down, as is methamphetamine use), alcohol use is down (from 42 percent reporting having a drink in the previous month in 1991 to 35 percent today), more wear seat belts (only 12 percent admit to not seat-belting), an additional 10 percent of students now will refuse to get in a car with a driver who has been drinking, and fewer smoke cigarettes than teens in the 1990s (though 20 percent still smoke).

Other risky behaviors continue. Over 35 percent watch three or more hours of television on an average school day, almost 80 percent have not had the daily recommended fruits and vegetables, more than 33 percent drink soft drinks during the day, and more than 65 percent fail to meet recommended levels of physical activity.

Much has been made of the “news” that the trend for delaying sex has leveled off and that progress seems to have stalled. The data in several areas of sexual activity peaked in 2003, but the changes have not been statistically significant. Some areas have inched downward or seem to have reached a plateau; some continue the trends, but not in significant ways.

The important information is that during the period from 1991 to 2007, teen sexual activity dropped, teen pregnancies declined and abortions declined. All of these positive developments coincide with the increased prevalence and greater sophistication of abstinence programs. No wonder the comprehensive sex education establishment is looking for opportunities to debunk their effectiveness.

Predictably, the relatively stable lines from 2003-2007 in students who have ever had sexual intercourse and students who are sexually active, as well as the slight decline in condom use, though not statistically significant, is being used by the comprehensive sex education establishment to blame abstinence programs. The timing of this interpretation of the data comes just as the Title V program is scheduled to expire on June 30, and the Senate Finance Committee, where the bill will be written, is headed by Senator Max Baucus (D-Montana), who opposes abstinence programs. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Senior Fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, the think tank for Concerned Women for America, is a recognized authority on domestic issues, the United Nations, cultural and women’s concerns.

Be the first to read Janice Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: good one housewear!
But it's fair to say they do it at a home (while the adults are at work), or they find isolated spots away from much pedestrian traffic.
As for the abstinence until marriage bit...sure, it's effective if you don't want to catch an infection or get pregnant, but it doesn't do much for your attraction quotient past a certain age.
That is to say, it's INEFFECTIVE in dealing with emotional and social maturity.
Abstinence is also an avoidance of serious relating and personal introspection and study of emotional ups and downs at the most intense threshold.

To say nothing of just how long can most people (especially gay teens) stand such a status when most of your friends are paired up and showing each other off to you?

Imagine a gay person having to stomach how heterosexuals push their happy sex lives and marriages, in the face, down the throat and all the while saying that marriage isn't and will NEVER be an option for a gay person?
Which is the equivalent of starving a gay person, but allowing the hetero crowd to gorge themselves on the cult of love, sex and marriage.
And then have the further gall to declare being homosexual as the saddest, least desirable life there is.
After a fashion, abstinence has a short shelf life-of course it should be cool for the very young and underaged.
But eventually, a person will feel way out of step with what they expect for themselves and from society and missing out on one of the most affirming things one human being can do for another.


hi swampfox!
I read about that high school principle, and rather than ASK or seriously read the guidelines regarding gay/straight alliance clubs, his mind raced right to 'those kids will be having sex', and decided against such a show of protective solidarity among the children.
What an a$$ and he deserved what he got and left his post.

Here in CA, there is mostly full support of GSA's. Indeed, the murder of 15 year old Lawrence King by his classmate, was a wakeup call to fully encourage such clubs as mandatory instead of elective.
But they ARE elective, and in SC the children were showing the adults what their needs were and an administrator failed them because of HIS misplaced prejudice.
GSA's are not only one of THE best responses to the inevitable reality of having someone gay in your life. it's also an example that such a revelation doesn't have to be met with fear, anxiety, paranoia or violence.
Which points out the NEGATIVE results of the traditional response to gay students and why it must be rejected in favor of GSA's which garner positive results.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: