Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, May 19, 2008
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Pornography and Sex Trafficking
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


California Assemblyman Charles Calderon estimates that people spend over $3,000 every second on adult entertainment and that there is a new adult video produced every 39 minutes.  California lobbyists for the adult entertainment industry estimate that they employ 50,000 people and generate $4 billion a year.  That multiple billion dollar figure reveals a pivotal fact about obscenity and pornography. They’re big bucks and big business.

Of course, we have laws on the books about obscenity and pornography, but, amazingly, obscenity is not taken seriously even by those legally charged with prosecuting offenders.  So, while the Department of Justice is not looking, our homes are being invaded by offensive language, suggestive advertisements, blatantly obscene so-called “entertainment” and movie scenes that make “dirty dancing” seem tame.

Many people defend anyone’s right to produce, distribute and consume obscene materials. They call us prudes when we object to the pornification of our culture. Evidently, they think it’s cute when little children are sexualized. They are blasé at obscenity on television and in movies. They shrug their shoulders at people who have a foul mouth or tell offensive jokes and use crude, vulgar language. 

They just don’t understand the ramifications of cultural disintegration. Yet, those who know the facts understand that small seedlings of the obscene can grow into giant sequoias of criminal sex networks.

Once the predator sees someone as a mere object –– instead of a person worthy of respect and dignity –– that person can be used, and abused, for the personal satisfaction of the predator; then, it is a very easy step to becoming a pimp and using that person as a commercial sexual commodity.

Some people begin their downward spiral into pornography addiction by perusing Playboy or Hustler or some free online adult porn sites. Having entered this gateway, some consumers crave the titillation of more graphic, perverted images to satisfy their desire for stimulation. Some of them need more violent, more sadistic images and, ultimately, they seek them out.

A research study of convicted sex offenders by psychologists at the Federal Bureau of Prisons became available last year; it will certainly disabuse those remaining people who think that obscenity and pornography are harmless indulgences.  The study found that more than 85 percent of prisoners convicted of possessing child pornography admitted to abusing at least one child. 

Obscenity is also used to ensnare women and girls into prostitution and sex trafficking.  So-called “modeling agencies” or “modeling agents” take nude photos of girls and women and then threaten them with the exposure of these photos if they are unwilling to prostitute themselves.

Ultimately, it is a matter of supply and demand. When there is demand, somebody will see this as a profitable opportunity and supply the goods. When there is demand for children to be used sexually, that demand will be met by ruthless traffickers. 

Many pimps and traffickers use pornography to initiate their innocent victims into their new life of sexual slavery.  The victims are shown pornographic films, over and over again for days at a time, so that they get hardened to accept the inevitable and learn what is expected of them.

The pattern of behavior is familiar; it follows the teaching technique of “translating image to action.” Teachers and coaches instruct the student to intensely visualize a desired outcome, act it out in the mind, and then it will become permanently imprinted on the psyche. With that technique, the teachers say, visualization leads to realization. 

So it is with obscene materials and pornography. The johns watch porn, seeing violent and aberrant behaviors on film, then they crave the realization of what they have seen. Those obsessions drive them to the prostituted women and girls to get what they have seen depicted so graphically.

Cultural acceptance of pornography, stripping and prostitution is growing by the day.  There are shows like “Pimp My Ride” and Academy-award winning songs like “It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimp” and they are not considered offensive, they are considered hip. In cities like Chicago and Miami, the “Pimp’s Ball” is a huge event where the pimps arrive in their outrageous limos, decked out in their “bling” and showing off their tattooed girls.

Such events make the point: if we do not enforce obscenity laws stringently, the ripple effect on the rest of the culture will lead to a tidal wave of degradation and destruction.

Stripper poles are now part of some people’s bedroom décor.  Pimp ‘n Ho parties are where the “in” crowd goes to have fun.  Pop Star, Beyonce, has just come out with the line of children’s clothing that looks like “pedophilia chic.” Dressing like a streetwalker is now considered an acceptable Halloween costume for young girls or a prom dress for a teenager.  There is even a line of clothing for infants called “Pimpfants.”  A culture where people have those attitudes and values makes it so much easier for traffickers to set up their business exploiting children, women and men.  

All of this should offend our sensibilities, but in today’s culture, it is no big deal.

Those films that are made in the San Fernando Valley in California?  They are very likely among the training tools used by sex traffickers from Malaysia to Mexico to Madagascar.  There is no escaping the fact that obscenity and pornography produced in the United States damages, demeans and degrades people –– including innocent children –– around the world.  The question is: what are we going to do about it and do we care enough to insist that the laws against obscenity be enforced?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
not a useful discussion of a serious top
There is something odd about pointing to something that we are paying 5 billion dollars for as invading our homes. It sounds like those of us who are bringing it into are homes are not being invaded at all.

There is no question that pornography and stripping are becoming more acceptable than they once were. It is less clear that prostitution and sex trafficking are increasing as a result. These are things that have always been around, they have hardly needed California pornography to get going. The worst parts of the sex trade industry remain outside of the country where our porn industry is likely least influential.

Similarly, since most of that 5 billion dollars is for porn that is not violent (unless one thinks that sex is itself violent) it is hard to see how that constitutes training material for acceptance of violence.

But then there does not seem to be a lot of concern with making the kinds of distinctions that would be useful for determining what was actually causing the real problems that are out there. But then if one really thinks that it is the availablility of porn itself that is the problem, then there wouldn't be much motivation to make such distinctions.

You and who's prison.
Arnie has just come out in California and says he may release up to 20 percent of the criminals early to cut the budget.

So, oh wise conservatives, on the demand side, where are you going to get the money to prosecute and imprison porn consumers? Taxes? But you don't want to raise taxes? Given that most obscenity happens in someone's home, just how you going to get the warrants, FISA? Where you going to get your reasonable cause without spying on people?

On the supply side, pornography is even cheaper to produce than drugs and we all now how the "war on drugs" is going on the supply side, eh?

Americans obviously want titillation in movies, television and the Internet. By comparison, considering how many years it was shown that tobacco kills yet conservatives fought for Tobacco companies, its kinda disingenuous to go after porn companies, don't you think? There is no preponderance of studies showing porn will kill ya like tobacco does.

Just curious as to home much the of population at large you all intend to throw into jail, anyway and doubly curious how you are going to pay for it all?

I'd like to see some actual numbers on just what percentage of the population consumes pornography in this country, assuming of course one could define "pornography". I'm guessing its close to 50 percent, like most of the adult male population at some point in their lives.





What is Pornography?
Everyone basically has his or her own opinion. I know mine is different than my wife's opinion. I'm sure that if we could actually sit down and talk, it would be hard to find two people with the same idea of what should be considered pornography. But Ms. Crouse seems to think that her definition is correct without actually stating that that definition is.

That is what is so hard for courts or legislators to decide. What can be considered and what cannot?

Right censorship vs. left censorship
Janice Crouse wants "pornography" and "obscenity" to be censored by govermental force. What are "pornography" and "obsscenity"? Basically, the expression of *ideas* about sex that she doesn't like, ideas which she thinks (maybe with some justification, mayb not) cause people to behave in harmful ways.

Leftist activists want "hate specch" regarding homosexuality, Muslims, etc.-- the expression of *ideas* about these groups which they think cause people to behave harmfully-- to be censored by government. What makes the difference? If we are to censor porn, why shouldn't we also censor Ms. Crouse when she writes a column critical of gays, or Muslims? Or maybe we should accept that neither left nor right has the right to censor, and that free speech carries no guarantee no one will ever say or do anything "harmful," but we value it anyway.

Obamas scariest statement yet
"Islam can be compatible with the modern world. It can be a partner with the Christian & Jewish & Hindu & Buddhist faiths in trying to create a better world." Barak Obama 2008
Democratic Compassion Forum at Messiah College Apr 13, 2008

compatible = capable of existing together in harmony.
Islam is a 700 AD religion and has NO rights for women.

partner = to join as a partner.
Islam and the Jewish religion partners?
================================================

Of all the things Obama has said this is by far the scariest.

Obama thinks Hamas and Iran can become partners with America and Israel?

“At the “World Without Zionism” conference held in Tehran in October 2005, as the crowd chanted “death to Israel, death to America, death to England,” the Iranian President
Ahminajead said...with the help of the Almighty, we shall soon experience a world without America and Zionism, notwithstanding those who doubt.”

Obama is talking about negotiating with the madman from Iran who has stated in no uncertain
terms that America and Israel will be destroyed im Ahminajeads lifetime?


Proof please?
Janice Crouse writes in part:

Some people begin their downward spiral into pornography addiction by perusing Playboy or Hustler or some free online adult porn sites. Having entered this gateway, some consumers crave the titillation of more graphic, perverted images to satisfy their desire for stimulation. Some of them need more violent, more sadistic images and, ultimately, they seek them out.>>

Yes, and "some people" start by having a beer or two and end up as hopeless alcoholics. "Some people" take drugs prescribed by a physician and end up addicted to painkillers. "Some people" start by going to a mainstream church on Sunday and end by joining a crazed suicide cult. We do not ban beer, useful prescriptions or religion because such things occasionally happen. It is no more typical for someone to start by reading "Playboy" and end up as a violent rapist or child molester. If Ms. Crouse thinks otherwise, let her provide proof (and I mean scientific proof from an impartial source, not anecdotal scare stories from anti-porn crusaders).

Ms. Crous also writes:
The study found that more than 85 percent of prisoners convicted of possessing child pornography admitted to abusing at least one child.>>

Has it occurred to her that perhaps she has cause and effect mixed up? That instead of child porn turning otherwise normal people into child molesters, that only people who already have a tendency toward pedophilia have any interest in child porn?





Enforcing *the* law
One more comment: Janice Crouse closes her column:
The question is: what are we going to do about it and do we care enough to insist that the laws against obscenity be enforced?>>

Personally, I care enough about the law of the land to insist that the supreme law of the land, the Constitution, be enforced. That includes the First Amendment, which *does not* -- howevermuch Ms. Crouse or certain conservative "activist judges" might wish otherrwise-- contain a "pornography exception".

If you don't like porno then don't
buy any. If you don't like the fact that other people buy it, tough, get a life.

I bet Mr. Crouse...
... sleeps in a separate bed.

PS... RETIRED GEEK... mind not cluttering up every thread with obsessive spam?

These formerly underground
and denigrated aspects of sexual development were all found as *rights* by the idiot Supreme Courts of the late 60s and early 70s and would surely never receive that utltimate legal imprimatur today.
It is patently obsurd on the face of the argument that any writer of the Const. or Dec. of Ind. ever considered pornocgraphy and degradation as part of the Bill of Rights or part of *normal* culture. They were people who read and spoke Greek and Latin, were students of philosophy, and conversed in vocabularies of extreme etiquette and sensibility.
All that this *modern*vdebasement has done for women is make them more ohjectified, less equal partners in any fashion, and more subject to exploitation.
When fifth and sixth grade males taunt their female classmates that they have *sexual hangups* because girls refuse lunchtime bj's behind a dumpster on the playground, and college frat boys report to college infirmiries unable to be aroused except by pornographic images, you know this nonsense has acceeded all bounds.
Parents have to be vigilant and forthright in keeping kids from porn sites on computers and being truthful about the perils of sexual abasement, even beyond the 56 venereal diseases the *sexual revolution*--truly a male land of fantasy and abuse--has invented in the last 40 years.

Rush to judgment
WRH Bill, there is a big difference between porn which objectifies people and often does them emotional and physical harm, and someone verbally expressing an opinion. If you can't see the difference then you have some deficits in intelligence and reasoning abilities. You might want to look into that.

Dr. Crouse points out that pornography is an industry that is filled with exploited women and children. THAT is the issue here. It is not a benign activity.

If you don't like porno them don't
Is difficult to comprehend the complete ignorance of a comment like the one made by Vic above. This is the moral equivalent of; If you don't like pedophiles molesting your children then don't invite them to your children's birthday parties. Whether you do or whether you don't those children are still in danger.

Janice Crouse is to be thanked for a very well reasoned argument for doing something to put a stop to the poison of pornography in our society. Pornography destroys individuals as well as families. Our culture can die from this poison! I keep it out of my home. Do you?

definition
For a long time people have dragged a certain red herring through discussions about this subject, that is, that it is difficult if not impossible to define pornography. In fact, it is quite easy to define:

Pornography is "literature" (in the broadest sense of that word, including not only writing, but pictures, videos, etc.) that sexually titillates by violating standard societal definitions of modesty.

Of course, just what "standard societal definitions of modesty" may be can be debated endlessly. And yes, such standards do change over time in every culture. But such standards do exist in every civilized culture, and probably in most uncivilized cultures as well (though they probably don't exist in California).

We have worse problems in the world...
...than pornography. Look, the Supreme Court just handed down a decision that enforces the current child pornography laws that we have in this country. That is a positive development. The laws will be enforced, but the issue is that we have to combat Islamo-Nazi terror around the world as well as securing our boarders.

So, while I do believe it is in poor taste that we have a so-called p*mp culture in America (I can't believe I can't even write out the word "p*mp" on these message boards.), it doesn't violate any laws, and it doesn't have nearly as much precedence as those other issues I mentioned. For Godsake, child sex trafficking is far worse in the Philippines and Indonesia than it is here, so why aren't we helping those young girls (or God forbid, boys) who are being victimized in those countries?

And please, if you start with this whole Playboy nonsense, you're just going to be laughed at because, for better or worse, most young women who choose to pose for Playboy or some other legal publication say they feel empowered by it, rather than being degraded. Help the ones who really are being degraded, which is certainly not here in California.

Consenting adults
Is the password to legal porn. Consenting adults can and do whatever they want to do.

If either of those two words is missing, it is and should be a CRIME.

Consent means 'with knowledge and without coercion of any sort.'

Adult means of legal age.

But, just because YOU like to view it/do it does NOT mean I want it in my home. It is MY RIGHT to keep it out. Hence ratings on movies. Would that we could rate some of the commercials!

Dublanite
Your post is comparable to burning books by the Nazis.

How is that for stupid comparisons.

There has NEVER been any credible evidence that pornography does anything to people who don't like it. All of this talk about harm to children is BS much like AGW and other big government lies.

There is a hard law against child pornography and it is vigourously enforced.

Also, explain the significance of your handle above.

pornography
you might want to pay a little more attention to that word you used what was it demand. ah yes. the only people who can let pornography inot their homes are the home dwellers. the only people who should be in charge of seing o it that 4 year olds are not exposed to it are the parents. control your children parents. obscenity is like prohibition, it was not enforced because people didnt want it enforced. its like prostitution, same thing people want it more than they want the difficulty tey prceive they would have to go through to get rid of it. basically pornograpy is one of the major guarantees of one of our most precious rights do what you will about if, just kleave me alone. if im giving it to a four year old that has nothing to do with pornography it is against the law to give minors offensive materials. as for the 85 percent that is such a misleading figure that your use of it causes me to doubt the validity of any of what you sy. what percent of american males use pornography and are not in jail. ?

Pornography and Sexual Addiction
Whatever one might think of the pornographic industry, many men do find themselves addicted.

The industry is not going to go away any time soon. So folks who have been caught on the dark side of things need to find a support group to help them. Programs such as Celebrate Recovery (www CelebrateRecoveryBoone com) as well as SA, SAA, S&LA are a great start.

Human Cost
I think that the column is right on. Pornography has a Human cost that is unacceptable no matter where in the world it is particpated in, or how many people are participating. We may not be in a position to do much about it in other parts of the world but we can, and should, be enforcing the laws we have here in our own country.
The cost is not limited to those who are exploited in producing this "commodity", but extends to those who choose to view or use pornagraphy. At first it is a choice, then it can (and most times does) become an addiction. Pornography is at least as addictive as illegal drugs are, if not more so...
Aside from the Human Cost, pornography is just plain wrong, no matter how some try to sugar coat it or use the Constitution to justify its existance.


KL
I say that there are no CREDIBLE studies. Yes, I have heard about several of these "studies" that try to correlate porn with the man in the moon marigolds but if you look at the so called studies closely they always fall apart just like the AGW fraud.

You ask why I give porn a pass when I am one of the "most far right" people on this site. LOL, "far right", a term always used by liberals when describing someone who is not a socialist or communist.

I don't necessarily give porn a "pass". I view it in the same category as I view other things that people do in the privacy of their homes. It ain't no body else's business!

I also find it extremely hypocritical for so-called conservatives to complain about big government and then turn around and demand big government censorship and nosiness in people's bedrooms.

A Joke!
I thought her column was rather absurd, for all the reasons already pointed out in previous comments, but some of the comments in support Crouse's column were far more ignorant. The Founding Fathers not only had their "pornography," many of them often had mistresses and frequented brothels as part of their social, political and business networking. During the Civil War even there were brothels within walking distance of the White House.

Pornography does not cause crime or teach people to mistreat women or children. Religion, the root of all evil, is the primary source of all bigotry, hatred, degradation, and subjugation of women. The Bible being just one of the most offensive pieces of literature out there. Ban that piece of crap!

Janice.. what are you thinking?
I can help you on this as it looks like you are lost. You can never remove nor will you ever remove this problem! This is the oldest problem in the world and as such you do not have a chance! Now; you can do one of two things. First; give it up all together and move on. Second; legalize it as it is in Germany and many other nations have done to, ready for this, control it! This in turn will make it safer, cleaner and actually help stop what you are whining about. Let us not forget money will be made by the STATE to help reduce tax bills! I do not like degrading people any more they you however, I do see the only way to control it is to embrace and not kick it in the pants!

hooking
You failed to mention that just as a drug pusher gives a free sample to hook a client on an addictive drug, so too porn is addictive and the greater abundance of free samples does not quench desire rather it inflames it. Porn and pornification creates its own demand, which on both an individual and cultural level increases.

To anyone who does not want porn, the ever increasing presence of it is worrysome and burdensome. Besides not wanting porn in your individual life, you might have relatives, sons and daughters to be concerned for. Then if all of yours are clean, but the man down the street is not, it represents a hazzard. Then there ought to be compasion on the people around the world who are abused and enslaved, some closer, within our own boarders, than we think.

While there will always be those who seek evil, if we make it harder to find fewer will.

A true conservative column
I'm pleased to se that Ms. Crouse is learning how to write truly conservative columns. Conservatives ought to be first in line to censor whatever they regard as harmful to society. They should be committed to maintenance of traditional values and virtues. I'm appalled to see some conservative readers expressing the libertarian notion that government should should let people watch porn in private. A real conservative understands that there is no right to do this. People only have rights to do, believe, and watch what is morally right. Thank goodness Ms. Crouse gets this. I often express my concern that conservatives are forgetting their own first principle. Ms. Crouse's column shows there is hope for conservatism yet.

Frightening and ridiculous column
This is an amalgam of selective statistics and bizarre reasoning. Virtue is not the product having to live in fear 24 hours a day of being turned into the police for "pornography"-related offenses. Yet that's the kind of society Janice Shaw Crouse wants for America. No thanks. I've been subscribing to Playboy for as long as I can remember and I've haven't raped or assaulted any woman. I don't believe I should be treated as a sex offender because of some back issues of Hef's magazine in my study.

It's remarkable how certain conservatives like Crouse decry the "nanny state" when it comes to economics, but demand a crackdown worthy of an Islamic police state when it comes to monitoring and punishing voluntary sexual behavior between adults. For Crouse, any intrusion is justifiable if it allegedly protects families. Please, Janice, don't protect mine.

Gestell
Conservatism is now "big government knows best"? LOL. We'll see how that "conservatism" does in November.

http://www.bobbarr2008.com

Worthless stats
"A research study of convicted sex offenders by psychologists at the Federal Bureau of Prisons became available last year; it will certainly disabuse those remaining people who think that obscenity and pornography are harmless indulgences. The study found that more than 85 percent of prisoners convicted of possessing child pornography admitted to abusing at least one child."

Huh? You proved that only child molesters are interested in child porn. Excellent detective work there Sherlock Holmes!!

Historical perspective
Back before the end of WWII, whore houses were common in the US. They were just a fact of life, and there was at least one in every town.

That needs to be taken into consideration while trying to see what prostitution does to cultures. Ignoring those whore houses is dishonest.


Let's read up a little on the subject
--
Quoting the late Peter McWilliams:

"In 1967, Congress established and funded a National Commission on Pornography. Its report, published in 1970, found that it was not pornography, but the puritanical attitudes toward pornography that cause problems in America. The report said the problems stemmed '...from the inability or reluctance of people in our society to be open and direct in dealing with sexual matters.' In surveys, the commission found that only 2 percent of Americans thought sexually explicit material was a significant social problem. The report recommended that all legislation interfering with the right of adults to read, obtain, or view explicit sexual material be repealed."


For more, see http://tinyurl.com/6r5gp9

Real conservatives (which explicitly excludes "social" or religious pseudoconservatives, who look upon government in precisely the same way that a Mafia capo pridefully considers the paid assassins and leg-breakers he uses to extort and murder his way to promotion and pay) don't give a damn about naughty words and feelthy pictures.


Doesn't it strike you "social" pseudoconservatives as in the *LEAST* disturbing that one of your most vociferous allies in this idiocy of yours is viciously "Liberal" femiNazi Andrea Dworkin?

--

--

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.