Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Another Layer of Guilt for Women
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


It's a cliché that other women are a woman's worst enemies. It's also a cliché that female bosses are more hard-nosed than male ones. Everybody also knows that women feel guilty whenever anything goes wrong; they tend to think problems are their fault. Now we have another book written by a woman for women telling us that we are making mistakes in our life choices and giving up too much. The basic message of a new book, The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much?, by Leslie Bennetts, is that women need to be selfish by avoiding economic dependency and self-centered in recognizing that their worth is largely dependent upon their workforce identity.

According to Bennetts, the biggest mistake that a woman can make is to think that a "man will support you;" there are too many "alluring promises" that are betrayed and "heartless fate" brings divorce, illness, disabling injuries, death, unemployment and a myriad of other events that can leave women in desperate circumstances and/or feeling underappreciated. Bennetts claims that even women in stable, enduring marriages end up viewing their decision to drop out of a career as the "biggest mistake of their lives."

The most disturbing thing about Bennetts' book is her disdain for women who choose to be stay-at-home moms or to drop off the career fast track. The cynicism toward men and marriage is palpable. In an interview with the Web site Huffington Post, the author referred to stay-at-home moms as being "0misled by the fairy-tale version of life, in which Prince Charming comes along and takes care of you forever." Bennetts wrote that the adult world patronizes stay-at-home moms and treats them with condescension as "dimwitted second-class citizens" that "can't deal with reality." Bennetts argues, "The facts don't change just because you refuse to look at them." She wrote her book to wake women up to the reality that there won't "always be an obliging husband around to support them." Joan Walsh praised the book on Salon.com for reminding women that "marriage usually isn't a lifelong paycheck."

Further, says Walsh, the Mistake book is actually written for a small demographic of women –– less than 10 percent –– who are affluent enough to have the option of stepping off the "fast track." Walsh described them as "privileged women" who "enjoy their suburban Colonial homes" and "lord it over the rest of us." Walsh sneers that stay-at-home moms "pretend that raising children is a lifelong endeavor (it isn't) that makes you better than other women (it doesn't)."

The book obviously is built on the author's personal experiences; she described her grandmother's tragic life after her grandfather left his wife for a mistress that he later married. The grandmother ended up depending on her sisters' husbands for survival. Bennetts' mother gave up an acting career for husband and family, but when the mother asked her husband to take over financial support of her mother, he refused. Afterwards, the mother found a job and made success in her profession a top priority. For Bennetts, these stories must have reinforced all those childhood impressions of feminine mistakes. Bennetts' mother gave her a copy of Betty Friedan's Feminine Mystique and told her, "Read this." She claims that the book changed her life from that point forward.

Clearly Bennetts' goal in writing her book seems to be to provide all possible evidence about the difficulties and penalties that women face when they leave a career to stay at home. She views women as ill-informed about practical realities. She also marshals arguments to try to convince women that work is more than a paycheck; she documents ways that women are healthier and happier when they have the gratification of earning money and the status of a professional position. She totally ignores the rewards of marriage and motherhood.

Bennetts warns women against dropping out of the workforce –– not even to scale back to be home when their children are infants. She recounts story after story of women who did just that and ended up in dire financial circumstances. In fact, the author turns quite shrill; she ends up picturing men as uniformly unreliable jerks. She also seems determined that everyone will be convinced that her way is best. She ignores the fact that women can have different values and different perspectives. As far as she is concerned, there is only one way for a woman, the Bennetts way. Anyone who ignores or dismisses financial concerns when considering love and marriage is stupid in Bennetts' view. Anyone whose top priorities are not career and financial security is even more stupid.

As Bennetts points out the truth about what women sacrifice and the consequences that they might face, she leaves women feeling foolish and guilty about making their husband and children their priority. One woman reacted to the book by saying it is "an indictment of my whole life as I currently live it." Another said she "shrieked with anger at all sides of the issues of this book." Bennetts has no sympathy for such women; they "don't let evidence get in the way of their pre-conceived biases." The author has no understanding of women's self-doubt, nor does she realize that she adds weight to the burgeoning pile of books warning women about how they mess up their lives whatever choice they make.

Clearly the "mommy wars" are a long way from over. Books like Feminine Mistake just add fuel to the feud.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
oops
sounds like bennett has made (at least) one "feminine mistake" of her own, i.e. believing that friedan's book has any truth or value to it.

Du wrote earlier:
"What it boils down to, is risk. A woman dependent on a man for her complete financial support and that of her children, is a risky proposition.
Period."

I couldn't agree with this more. It's merely an extension of any kind of dependence, which manifests itself all too often in both genders. Even for women who make the choice (keyword: choice) to stay at home with children, they should be capable of supporting themselves if push came to shove.

A woman should also know how to fix a leaky faucet, and mow the lawn, and change her oil, and do her taxes, even if her husband normally takes care of these things. And men should know how to cook for themselves, and do their own laundry, and a host of other things. Too many women don't have a clue how to manage their finances or support themselves if a guys bolts or dies, and too many men suddenly turn into children that can barely wash themselves if their girl bolts or dies.

One of the current internal problems of the feminest movement, which I consider myself a part of, is the struggle to remember the original point: choice. Any choice should be valid, but all choices have their costs. The choice to work full time certainly has it's cost - for men and women. I'm a woman, and heading into a heavy work load career, expecting to work at least 60 hours a week. And my likely future husband will play the role of 'stay-at-home dad' if we have children. It's the division of labor that works best for the two of us, just like him taking out the trash and my doing the dishes works best.

I could never be a stay at home mother. It just wouldn't work for me. And not because I don't respect it - I certainly don't view my likely future husband with disrespect because he may be a stay at home parent at some point. And my mother was a stay at home parent for some 22 years. But those who advocate for that choice must surely recognize the risks, risks that are only dimished, not removed, if you have a backup plan. My mother would have been beyond screwed if my father had been a lout, or had suddenly died when I was 10. My likely future husband will have savings from prior work and probably be working part-time from home as a stay at home parent - aware of and handling the risk.

And let's not ignore the corollary risks of full-time work. My father worked hard for my family as sole breadwinner, and I am eternally grateful. But the pressure was enormous. He was aware of our dependency on his earnings, my mother, brother and I, I am quite sure, every second of his life while we lived at home. And it altered him, I have realized now. My mother always talked when I was a kid about how he was different when they were dating - kinder, easier, and simply more fun. He was difficult to talk to, and frankly absent for most of my childhood. I resented him as child for that -- he was simply the harsh disciplinarian who would appear every once in a while, who could barely have a conversation with me. He missed our childhoods. I am getting to know him only now, in my late 20s - once we were out of school, and the financial pressures and fears relented, he has turned back into the person he apparently was before it all began.

I intend not to make the same mistake.

My mother does not regret being with us as children, and we most certainly benefitted from her constant presence - but I've never seen her happier than the past few years when she began working. She makes perhaps 5-10% of what my father does, so it's clearly not for the numbers. Given both of my parents reactions, I can't help but think we all would have been a bit happier if my mother had worked, at least part-time. It would have alleviated some financial pressure, making my father more available, and frankly nicer, and would have given her a greater sense of validity. These are the choices they made, but as they acknowledge openly, they are the choices they made in youth and ignorance in a time and place when 'that's just the way it was'.

My mother now believes that all parents who can should work 30 hours each rather than one parent working 60 and the other 0. (or 20 and 20 vs 40 and 0, etc). It's an interesting idea, and one we might be moving toward - the workforce is changing. Some men complain about women wanting flextime and part-time options to be more available to their kids - my response is that men should be demanding these things too! Every working parent should be able to be available to their children.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.