Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
NOW Embraces Hillary. Will she hug Back?
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


The Legacy Media are touting the endorsement of Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential bid by the political arm of the National Organization for Women (NOW). Hillary should have thought twice before accepting NOW’s endorsement. NOW began in 1966 when Betty Friedan claimed to speak for all American women. The women's group has come a long way since those times –– a long way, the wrong way. After 40 years, a whole new generation of women is questioning the feminist myths that have produced so much devastation for America’s families in general and most especially for the children.

A CBS poll revealed that three out of four women described the word feminist as an insult. Another study found that the number of working women who believe that a career is as important as being a wife and mother has fallen 23% since the 1970s.

What has caused such a dramatic change in women's attitudes?

The feminist movement began to unravel the more it promoted the idea that inhibiting one's sexual desires, in any fashion, is a bad thing. Then, feminism took increasingly more radical positions that took the movement even further out of the mainstream: men and women are completely interchangeable, women don't need men, all family arrangements work equally well for rearing children. Hillary is convinced that the "woman's vote" will be her secret weapon for victory; she is forgetting that mainstream women don’t identify with feminism or with the issues pushed by feminists.

Problems with Issues:

Abortion-on-Demand: Since one of the central aspects of women's liberation is so-called "free love" –– sexual activity that is unconstrained and without consequences –– the feminists declared that abortion-on-demand is a basic human right and they made abortion-on-demand an essential and sacred element of their life's creed. The abortion activists defend the 45 million murders of unborn lives by abortionists –– at every turn and in every arena.

Federally Mandated Day Care: Feminists demand that childcare arrangements be federally funded so that the rearing of children can be turned over to childcare providers and thus not interfere with a woman's career aspirations. The data clearly indicate that there are elevated risks to babies and children who are in day care too much –– generally conceded to be over 20 hours a week. These data have consistently been suppressed, buried and un-reported –– or unfairly attacked and distorted. In fact, the suppression of the overwhelming evidence about the attachment, behavioral, emotional and health risks associated with the overuse of day care amounts to statutory child abuse, but such is the power of the feminist special interests that they can keep that information from widespread dissemination. Feminists are at the forefront of those who are trying to convince the world that "father and mother" are just words –– that all a child needs are both male and female influences and that any man and woman can provide a child's nurturing and guidance needs.

Sexual Orientation Special Agenda: Feminists are determined to mainstream lesbian and gay, bisexual, and even transgendered lifestyles. One of the women's movement biographers attributed Betty Friedan's downfall as the "mother of feminism" to her refusal to embrace homosexuality. Some of the movement leaders privately accused Friedan of only dealing with "symptoms" and that only "those willing to explore the significance of 'women loving women' would come to grips with the underlying causes of women's oppression."

Anti-Masculinity: Feminists currently argue the importance of the role of men and boys in achieving gender equity. There is considerable emphasis on teaching young boys to be more "sensitive" and less "aggressive." Characteristics that are stereotypically "male" are clearly undesirable and consistently are portrayed in a negative light.

Problems with Feminist Icons. Hillary should also remember that the women behind feminist ideas had disastrous personal lives; few of today's young women want to end up with personal lives like Hillary's or any of the other feminist leaders.

Betty Friedan: Friedan, the mother of the feminist movement, gave us The Feminine Mystique –– and the "problem that has no name." That problem –– according to Friedan –– is that women are victims. Being female means having delusions and false values and being forced to find fulfillment and identity through husbands and children. Friedan worked nine hours a day –– declaring that being a wife and mother was "not going to interfere with what I regarded as my real life." Not surprisingly, Friedan’s three children had to undergo therapy to deal with what was called "the emotional fallout."

Gloria Steinem: Steinem was the beauty queen of the feminist movement. Steinem, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate, was engaged to her college boyfriend. After breaking up with him and discovering that she was pregnant, she had an abortion. Later, Steinem founded Ms. Magazine and coined two phrases ––"reproductive freedom" and "pro-choice" –– bringing a brilliant sense of marketing to a movement that glossed over the realities of promiscuity and abortion and propelled so-called "sexual freedom" into the mainstream. Steinem famously declared that a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. She remained single until her 60s –– when she married a divorced man with grown children.

Germaine Greer: Known as the diva of feminism, Germaine Greer is, like Gloria Steinem, now in her 60s. Greer has two books: The Female Eunuch, which kick-started her fame and The Whole Woman, which basically repudiated everything Greer had said previously. Known for her bawdy diatribes, Greer preached that sexual liberation is the path to fulfillment. Greer has had "several" abortions –– leaving her unable to have children. She has stooped to get attention by being an apologist for female genital mutilation. She was married briefly (for three weeks) during which time, she brags, she cheated on her husband seven times. But at age 60, she mused: "The finest time in your life was when you fell asleep in someone's arms and woke up in the same position eight hours later. Sleeping in someone's arms is the prize." Inevitably, she sleeps alone.

Andrea Dworkin and Katherine McKinnon: These women made the ridiculous assertion that "marital sexual relations are a form of rape." Some feminists considered this bold leadership. What a hideous idea –– to distort the God given capacity of a man and woman to love each other and produce new life by describing it as rape.

The list could go on to include disparate feminist personalities like Patricia Ireland, as well as Alice and Rebecca Walker. Hillary herself coined the phrase that "women’s rights are human rights," a phrase that enabled the radical feminist agenda to pose as "human rights." The former first lady was the power behind implementing the Beijing Platform for Action –– a U.N. document from the 1995 world women's conference that sought to "mainstream gender equity" by forcing quotas as essential to so-called "gender" rights.

Ironically, Betty Friedan realized that history and truth had passed the feminists by; she ended up taking back many of her words. The feminist vision has failed, yet the truth about the equality of all human beings has flourished. Witness the resurgence of conservative values among young women and the reductions in promiscuous sexual activity by teens documented by the CDC in the last 15 years. Gabrielle Molnar, Young Businesswoman of the Year in 2003, explained that she didn't want to be called a feminist "because feminism doesn’t support the cause of women."

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Birds of a feather..
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a feminist.

Issues

Abortion: Senator Clinton's votes have demonstrated an unwavering commitment to a woman's right to safe, legal abortion, while at the same time working on programs to reduce the number of unintended and unwanted pregnancies.

Same-Sex Marriage/Civil Unions: Senator Clinton actively opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment to the Constitution that would have banned same-sex marriage, and supports civil unions plus all federal benefits. She said, "In the end, we defeated the Federal Marriage Amendment and we sent a strong message that we will not stand idly by when anyone tries to write discrimination into our Constitution."

The Anti-family: Violence Against Women Act: As First Lady, Clinton was out front in urging Congress to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act. As a U.S. senator she has fought to fully fund VAWA, arguing that the programs of the act are critical to women being able to establish lives free from violence and its ensuing problems.

One issue that seperates her from other feminsts: she has yet to divorce her husband.

http://www.nowpacs.org/2008/hillary/issues.html


Mark Ruffulo,
You said, "One issue that seperates her from other feminsts: she has yet to divorce her husband." I would have to add the following:
One issue that separates her from other feminists: she has yet to divorce her husband and admit that she prefers partners of the female persuasion.

I Love This Article
I really don't like Hillary's values, and therefore do not want her to be president. That being said I really like the points made in this article. I am not democrat or republican, but vote according to my beliefs and morals all which object to Hillary Clinton. Furthermore, most of the women that I know in my generation do not want what the feminists told them to want, and they value staying at home with their children as often as possible.

The Death of Feminism
One of the founders of the world feminist movement has, in even more dramatic fashion than Friedan, renounced what the "women's movement" has become in her book, The Death of Feminism.

Phyllis Chesler mourns the death of a once noble movement which stood for all women's rights, and calls attention to its staggering silence about the treatment of women under radical Islam during this interview:

"I mourn the Stalinization and Palestinianization of the feminist postcolonial and postmodern academy and media. Because such feminists refuse to "judge" Islamic gender apartheid, they and their institutions and organizations have become anti-activist, anti-American, anti-Israeli, isolationist, and, at best, tools of the Democratic party. At worst, they are apologists for Islamist jihad. To avoid the McCarthyite charge of "racism," such feminists have been willing to sacrifice the victims of Islamism on their "multicultural" altars."

Lopez (interviewer): "Is it shocking to you that "feminism" can't give President Bush any credit, at least, say, for removing the Taliban from power?"

Chesler: "Yes. I published a letter in the New York Times congratulating him for doing so. I have also written about the powerful women's-rights language contained in many of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's speeches throughout the Muslim Middle East. It is also shocking that the same feminists who protected President Bill Clinton's sexual abuse of women have not congratulated President Bush for his appointment of Condoleezza Rice and for his Administration's attempts to craft and enforce legislation against trafficking, both domestically and internationally.

"Palestinianized Western feminists are more concerned with the so-called occupation of a country that does not exist (Palestine), than with the occupation of women's bodies worldwide under Islam. The fact that feminists and leftists still continue to call for boycotts of Israel and to actively demonstrate against a war-time president even after 9/11, 3/11, and 7/7 tells me that they have literally been brainwashed and that reality has no defining role in determining their thoughts or their actions.

"Islamic terrorists have declared jihad against the "infidel West" and against all of us who yearn for freedom. Women in the Islamic world are treated as subhumans. Although some feminists have sounded the alarm about this, a much larger number have remained silent.

"Why is it that many have misguidedly romanticized terrorists as freedom fighters and condemned both America and Israel as the real terrorists or as the root cause of terrorism? In the name of multicultural correctness (all cultures are equal, formerly colonized cultures are more equal), the feminist academy and media appear to have all but abandoned vulnerable people, Muslims, as well as Christians, Jews, and Hindus to the forces of reactionary Islamism. Both women and religious minorities in non-Western and Muslim countries, and in an increasingly Islamized Europe, are endangered as never before. Because feminist academics and journalists are now so heavily influenced by left ways of thinking, many now believe that speaking out against head scarves, face veils, the chador, arranged marriages, polygamy, forced pregnancies, or female genital mutilation is either "imperialist" or "crusade-ist."

"My own views about Islamic gender- and religious-apartheid have been received warmly and respectfully by conservatives, while such views have been attacked by many feminists as ”white nationalist” and ”racist.” To the best of my knowledge, the American feminist movement, with its vast access to university positions, has not offered [Ayaan] Hirsi Ali a perch. Perhaps multi-culturally correct feminists are ambivalent about challenging Islamist misogyny—lest they too be censured as “racists” or threatened with death. Indeed, as I document in my book The Death of Feminism: What’s Next in the Struggle for Women’s Freedom, among most feminists, race trumps gender."

Feminism
Where in heaven's name do you get the idea that
what you have described is also a description of
feminism and the feminists of today. The
people you talk about -Steinem, Greer, and Friedan - came from the very earliest days of
the movement. It is no surprise that revolutions
are started by radicals. Once the revolution has
been won and we live with the results on a day
to day basis does not mean that we are all still
radicals. The very fact that you had to go back
to the very earliest leaders would suggest that
changes have been made and you know it, but
you don't want to speak to those changes. They
are not inflammatory enough. Feminists often
stay home with their children; feminists often
get married and even love and appreciate men;
feminists probably don't sleep around any more
than anyone else. I can't prove it, of course,
but I know a whole lot of them and am one myself
and we really are quite respectable people.
Haven't burned a bra in 30 years (well, actually
never).

Those women who sneer at feminism, which to some
extent includes my daughter, haven't a clue what
it was like before the movement. One day I picked up an old LIFE magazine from the 50's.
I showed it to her and asked her to tell me how
many of the photo layouts/stories were about
women. There was one and she was a performer
who was just on the verge of making it big, except nobody has heard of her since then. All other articles about politics, or business, or whatever were exclusively about men without even
so much as a secretary (woman) in any of the
photos. Even I was stunned.

Feminism is no longer a movement. It is a battle
won and now we are on to other things. Obviously
things are not perfect. They never are. The world is still made up of very imperfect people.
There is no getting around that.

Some of those imperfect people are the ones who go around hollering that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian without a shred of evidence, and those
who would psychoanalyze this woman without knowing her. (Maybe, just maybe, she still loves
the guy). Why don't you just say "I can't stand her because she is a liberal and will
probably be the next president" and be done with it. But thank you Catalina and Not Ashamed and
Pappy and Mike & all the rest of you who keep saying the same stupid things about Hillary for your deep insights into this woman.

Why don't we all get together some time and discuss the condition of the Bush marriage. Wouldn't that be a fun and profitable way to spend our time.

One more thing
While we are having our fun chat, we might also
discuss who has raised the better children.
But that wouldn't be nice, would it?

viruddh
I can't remember the old days being "bad" any more than I notice recent days being nirvanna. And I'm old enough that I should remember!

It does sound as though it's a good thing you live here rather than the middle east, because you'd otherwise be writing about the joys of bomb building - not those old, nasty grim ones, but newer ones in pastel colors and with "pot pourri."

You said,
"Feminism is no longer a movement. It is a battle
won and now we are on to other things. Obviously
things are not perfect. They never are. The world is still made up of very imperfect people. There is no getting around that."

Pray tell, where are the trenches to-day?

re: your second post.
BTW, "...who HAS raised the better children?" What is your yardstick? I'd bet you could find one or two people who'd disagree with you.

Almost forgot...
Good article, JSC.

NOW?!?
You mean they're still around?

Isn't that, like, so 1973?

Do they still wear Birkenstocks? Hairy legs? Granny dresses?

Didn't Gloria Steinem die or something?


NOW?!?

Rowena
The "fun chat" relates to my last paragraph in
my first post - basically a chat about the
Clintons Marriage and that of the Bushes. The
2nd post was about their kids. It was nasty.
I should have skipped it, but was trying to make a point.

The point is that study after study has suggested
that the behavior and success of kids is not
affected by whether mom does or does not
work, but whether dad is in the home and
organized religion is part of the child's life.

And sometimes a kid has it all, and still gets
into trouble.

BrianR
I think they're still wearing Birkies, but now they actually need them, along with support hose.

The hairy legs succumbed to senile alopecia, the granny glasses are prescription, and now they wish they had the bras they burned - anatomical landmarks being about an inch or two lower for each decade of age!

Ho hum......

Rowena!
LOL!

That's great! Cool post!

You cracked me up no end!


Catalina: Hmmm....
I've always wondered about Hillary....

Is she, perhaps, really Bill in drag?

I mean, does anyone ever see them together at the same time in the same place standing together?

Something to think about....


available opportunities

If I were a woman married to a Billy goat like that, I'd probably be a lesbian by now, too. Who could blame her? I don't subscribe to the fashionable dogma that a person's "sexual orientation" is determined at birth. It would be nice if everybody were highly moral in all circumstances, but it just ain't so. Likewise, people's "preferences" may be hard-wired for the most part, but they sometimes respond to the opportunities that are available. How else can you explain the prevalence of homosexual activity in prisons, then the miraculous "cures" that occur when inmates are released?

I had a childhood friend who was madly in love with the most beautiful girl in town, a virtual Helen of Troy, a flower so lovely that she drove the boys mad. I recently reminisced with another childhood friend from those early days and he, too, confirmed that Marie drove everybody mad. The childhood friend who was in love with her could never have her; she wasn't interested. He later became gay. I'm certain -- no matter what anybody says -- that if Marie had loved him, too, that he would have turned out completely "normal."

People spread lesbian gossip about Eleanor Roosevelt, but it's neither here nor there. Franklin was a great leader, but he was also a mama's boy and an insufferable egotist -- probably a little difficult to tolerate at home on a day-to-day basis. Eleanor was a great lady, a real leader and a true original, which Hillary is not.

One of the most embarassing things about Hillary is how badly she'd like to be Eleanor. Unfortunately, she's an imitator, not just of Eleanor, but of Bill, of various feminists, et alia. I went to college at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960's when the Germaine Greer/Gloria Steinem version of feminism was at its height. Even girls who weren't feminists would shove their articles in my face and insist, "You've gotta read this!"

Although Hillary was off at her snooty Eastern school at the time, she reminds me of college girls I didn't like, who were so jealous of their older brothers that they had to show how tough they were by swearing, calling boys "male chauvinist pigs" indiscriminately and wearing army camouflage jackets to class.

We've come a long way since then, Baby, and thank goodness! The younger generation seems more able simply to be themselves; less obsessed with overturning icons. Hillary is an anachronism more than anything else. The politics of nostalgia handicaps a lot of wannabees -- not least some of the conservatives on this website who yearn to return to the good old days. Janice Crouse is not one of them, and she makes many good points above.

NOW's agenda....
Printed in the Philadelphia Daily News - March 13, 2007
http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/opinion/16892042.htm

SOME WOMEN MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
By DONNA BAVER ROVITO

ZILLA HUMMA Usman and Ayaan Hirsi Ali may be the bravest women on the planet.

Not brave like they might lose their jobs or be insulted for speaking out about workplace inequities, or they might get cold or wet demonstrating against "Bush's war."

I mean really brave, like they might be shot or stabbed or stoned or set on fire for having the courage to fight for the rights of Muslim women who are being oppressed, mutilated, abused, raped or even killed for the crime of being a woman.

Sadly, one of these brave women, Pakistani provincial minister Usman, IS dead - killed because she wasn't wearing a head scarf and held public office. "I just obeyed Allah's commandment," said gunman Mohammad Sarwar. "I will kill all those women who do not follow the right path." Many fundamentalist Muslims apparently feel the same way, if the number of "honor killings" in Pakistan - and in Germany, Canada and Australia- is any gauge.

The president the National Organization for Women immediately issued a statement denouncing Usman's murder and praising her work, calling on feminists throughout the world to continue her fight for gender equality for Muslim women.

Oh, wait... no, she didn't.

Neither NOW nor its Web site said anything about this brutal murder or the loss of this significant female leader. Not a word. (There is, however, an important piece on the site about how " 'Desperate Housewives' Misleads Viewers About Teen Contraception.")

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somali-born author of "Infidel," learned of a death threat against her when it was stabbed into the nine-times-shot-and-nearly-beheaded body of Theo Van Gogh. They had collaborated on a short film called "Submission" about the oppression of women in conservative Islamic cultures.

Forced out of her adopted home of Holland, where she was member of Parliament, Hirsi Ali now lives in the United States, where she was warmly welcomed by sister feminists from NOW, which offered her a weekly column about Muslim women's rights on its Web site and features her writings prominently in its Books section, as well as a link to download "Submission."

Oh, wait... no, they didn't.

There isn't a single entry about Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the NOW Web site. (But there IS a helpful video about "how advertising effects women's body image, health and self-esteem.")

There isn't a single book about Islamic gender apartheid among the 48 books on the NOW Web site. There are, however, six books bashing George Bush, a book attacking Mormon treatment of women and others advocating gay marriage - but nothing about forced marriages, honor killings, rapes, beatings or other forms of oppression suffered by Muslim women.

Fortunately, the American Enterprise Institute does offer Ali's books and a forum on which she can express thoughts like: "A culture that carves the genitals of young girls, hobbles their minds and justifies their physical oppression is not equal to a culture that believes women have the same rights as men... Just as we put an end to slavery, we must end the gendercide."

Their Web site claims that NOW's goal is "equality for all women" and fighting those who want to "keep women in their place." But they seem to have no outrage for the hideous place in which Islamic fundamentalists keep their women.

NOW has plenty of outrage, though, for Christian leaders they call "the American Taliban," anyone who doesn't support gay marriage and unrestricted abortion, and the "bully-in-chief" himself, George W. Bush, whom they targeted in a recent "peace march" in Washington, demonstrating their solidarity with some of the worst oppressors of women in the world - fundamentalist Islamic regimes.

In this case, I suspect that the enemy of their enemy (Bush) is not really their friend.

All of which makes me want to paraphrase Orwell's famous line about hypocrisy: "All women are created equal - but some women are more equal than others."

The women who are more equal might be identified as elitist non-religious Western feminists who support abortion, gay marriage and Hillary Clinton, and who just hate George W. Bush.

Sadly, at least in the eyes of America's most visible women's group, some women who are not as equal as others apparently include those subjugated by radical - and sometimes not so radical - practitioners of Islam throughout the world.

America and the rest of the western world's feminists are suffering from a self-absorption that fails to see the world outside their own sphere of privilege.

But they're also suffering from the trivialization and politization of what once used to be a noble fight for ALL women's rights.

Donna Baver Rovito is an advocate for quality health care and women's rights.


other pertinent news articles

DBR:

The New York Times ran two stories a week ago to add to your list. One cites a recent German court decision in a divorce case, which in effect implies that wife-beating is legal if you're Muslim man. The other story details instances of immigrants to the United States who are covertly importing second wives in order to practice Islamic-sanctioned polygamy as it exists in the old country.

American feminists by their silence on these issues and by remaining silent about the heroic women you mentioned, imply that they are not concerned. It goes to show you how the most daring movements for freedom can fall captive to one political party, revert to parochialism or get stodgy in their old age.

NOW's support of Hillary is a negative
viriddth posts: Feminism is no longer a movement. It is a battle
won and now we are on to other things. Obviously
things are not perfect. They never are. The world is still made up of very imperfect people.

Actually, feminism was never a movement, however, radical feminism was and is now very much being waged...and, in my opinion, to the detriment of us all, particularly the children, including the unborn. I grew up during the 50's and then women and girls were treated like princesses compared to today now that we've been "liberated". It's been 40 years since radical feminism took hold and the stats are in and they aren't pretty if one has eyes to see. Go to a mall or a public school and look around. You'll see that women and girls do not respect themselves nor do men and boys respect us.


doggy
You are exactly right. Feminism did REAL women wrong and my wife discusses that at length. Let the Feminazis endorse Hitlary, it'll push REAL women, who are against everything NOW embraces, away from The Hildabeast.

NOW - National Organization of Witches
This is an excellent article – joining the ranks of many others which are clearly exposing the radical nature of NOW. NOW began with good intentions and embraced an egalitarian charter though in recent years it has largely become radical.

A quick visit to the NOW website quickly reveals that NOW refutes, ignores and twists the results of current-day studies and evidence that clearly promote gender equality and does so with the twisted agenda to promote feminism as a cleverly cloaked female superiority. They have lobbied heavily against gender equality in the care of children and refused at every opportunity to recognize the significant mounting evidence on the benefits of shared parenting. They claim that this is a sham to avoid child support and that men just make this an issue about money – but neglect to point out that their refusal to recognize the benefits of shared parenting amounts to the very same crime – reducing the issue to money. On close examination it becomes clear that NOW cleverly and subversively reduces this argument to money but does so in “the Best Interest of Children.” This is even a larger crime.

NOW continues to site Lenora Weitzman’s statistics about the wealth of the genders after divorce – these numbers were proven to be significantly flawed and incredibly misleading not only by many other studies but through the self admission of Lenora herself. (http://www.acbr.com/biglie.htm).

NOW refuses to recognize that domestic violence is just that Domestic Violence – it is not violence against women only. The level and severity of violence that is perpetrated against men is continually ignored by NOW and the political agenda to ensure that this is ignored by society is doggedly and stubbornly pursued by NOW. This is hurting women and men of domestic violence and the unjust laws, erroneous beliefs and incredulous precedents that are growing as a result of this agenda force true victims (both men and women) into compromising situations.

Hilary’s alignment with this organization is a sad event – not only for our people but also for our first shot at a woman’s approach to the presidency – something we all should be looking to embrace but must refute if even remotely associated with radicalism.

Hillary isn't the first shot.....
....at a woman presidency. OK, she's probably the one with the best chance of winning, but she's actually the 12th woman to run for president....and the ninth mother...

Details in this recent piece in the Washington Post:

Mothers Who Blazed a Trail - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/03/20/GR2007032000072.html
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.