Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Off-ramping: Women jumping off the career track
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


The public square is still filled with those who argue that women are at a disadvantage when it comes to employment; even more believe women face a glass ceiling when it comes to promotion. New facts, though, indicate that the playing field at work is quite level; indeed, in some instances women have a distinct advantage both in hiring and in promotion. Studies also show that highly-qualified women can jump off the fast track and then catch up when they are ready to jump back on. It’s called “off-ramping;” increasingly, talented women who want to balance career and family are taking that route.

Thirty years ago, women earned far less than 10 percent of the medical, law and M.B.A. degrees awarded in the U.S., now they earn at least 40 percent of those advanced degrees. The big accounting firm, Ernst & Young claims that at least half of their new hires are women. Among workers under age 30, according to the Census Bureau, slightly over 25 percent of men hold bachelor’s degrees as compared with slightly over 32 percent of women. These credentials prove an open door for women to have lucrative careers, many with a distinct advantage over their male competitors.

A partner at Ernst & Young, Carolyn Buck Luce, said that the current job situation boils down to a “war for talent.” Many corporations are willing to adjust to a talented, well-trained woman’s needs in order to keep her on the roster. At Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC), 10 percent of the firm’s female partners are on a part-time schedule. Officials at the firm insist that stepping off the fast track does not mean career suicide. Toni Riccardi told Time magazine in 2004 that going part-time “might slow your progress, but it won’t prohibit you” from climbing the career ladder.

The attitudes of corporations like Ernst & Young and PWC have empowered Generation Xers, those men and women who were born mid-sixties to mid-seventies. Time magazine reported on a Catalyst survey from 2001 that found Gen Xers are unwilling “to make the kind of trade-off” that previous generations made. Further, Catalyst found that “both women and men [Gen Xers] rated personal and family goals higher than career goals.” These findings indicate a profound shift of attitude in the workforce.

Leslie Stahl reported on 60 Minutes (CBS, October 2004), that over the past decade the number of stay-at-home moms increased by 15 percent. Even so, nearly three-fourths of mothers with children under 18 are in the work force. Well-educated mothers with infants, though, are dropping out (59 percent in 1997 compared to 53 percent in 2000). The Beverly LaHaye Institute first reported this trend in its Data Digest. Nearly a quarter of these stay-at-home moms have graduate or professional degrees. This trend is “huge” says Howard Hayghe, an economist with the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

According to a 2005 Harvard Business Review (HBR) study, family responsibilities are identified as the motivating force behind young careerists who choose to “off-ramp.” Gen X parents say they spend more time on child-rearing (51 percent of the women are stay-at-home moms) and household tasks than the Boomer parents (33 percent of the women were full-time mothers) did; further, they express the desire to spend more time –– especially those in the higher income brackets. The Los Angeles Times reported that fathers today are helping around the house much more than a decade ago (34 percent compared to 24 percent).

HBR estimates that women lose about 18 percent of their earning power when they off-ramp. Many young professionals view this as an acceptable loss for being able to parent their children.

A study of senior-level executives in Fortune 1000 companies –– by Harris Interactive for Pepperdine University’s Graziadio School of Business and Management –– revealed that fewer than half of senior-level executives are concerned about off-ramping because nearly 40 percent think that within two to four years a woman will make up the losses in salary and position. Another 12 percent, though, think catching up will take more than four years and 13 percent think it unlikely that women who off-ramp will ever fully catch up.

Some women chose to become entrepreneurs so that they can be their own boss and set their own hours; women-owned businesses grew by 14 percent from 1997 to 2002 (compared to a 7 percent growth in U.S. businesses overall). Perhaps more startling is the fact that these women-owned businesses are growing enough to increase their hiring by 30 percent (compared to other businesses at 18 percent nationwide). Also surprising is that in more than a quarter of two-income households now the wife is the primary breadwinner. Molly Selvins (LA Times, 2/4/07) compared the percentages from 1987 (17.8 percent) to today when 25.3 percent of the wives earn higher salaries than their husbands.

These economic factors, though, apparently have little to do with a woman’s happiness. The Heritage Foundation’s Family Fact 8219 reveals that a husband’s beliefs about family, the value of marriage, desire for children and respect for traditional gender roles are key in determining whether a wife reports happiness with the love and affection of her husband.

CWA’s Brenda Zurita and Sarah Rode compiled the research for this article.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I have personal experience with this ...
I went to law school. Graduated 21 years ago. Deliberately opted out of private practice, because I did not want the hours associated with litigation. Guess what? You can choose a small firm, a small town, a small firm IN a small town, a corporate law job, a teaching job, a foundation - there are literally dozens of options for someone who wants a "real" life - including children - and a professional career.

I taught law school for years, and then went into university administration. I live in modest-sized midwestern town where I work 7 minutes from where I live.

I married at 41. Had one child at 42 and another at 44 (and yes, I know, I am blessed and fortunate to have been able to do this).

Who did I marry? A wonderful man. Who happens to be younger. I didn't "marry up" in the sense that my husband is not older, more successful or wealthier than I am. Why would I care about that? I married someone I loved, who wanted a family. He went back to school (nights), and between his flexible schedule and mine, our children are home with us most of the time. (They attend a Presbyterian preschool in the morning.)

My point is that it's do-able, but you need to make compromises. You cannot have everything. As Janice points out, those of us who want children (and want to be home with them as much as possible) are willing to make sacrifices to make that happen.

One side of a coin
Crouse, whose work I generally like, is looking at a single aspect of economic activity here. I have believed for some time now that Americans are slowly migrating back to the family- and property-oriented modes of work, investment, and wealth creation that prevailed throughout most of history, before the Industrial Revolution turned everything in life into "having a job."

Many, many women, and more men with each decade, are deciding to organize themselves as businesses, rather than function as employees, and to arrange the time and place of work flexibly. There's still a significant portion of the population that longs for prestige and "security" -- big law and finance firms, union jobs with the big name manufacturers -- but what's happening is that people are finding ways to work and succeed outside of, and alongside of, those paths.

The economy growing up outside of our industrial and professional employment models isn't necessarily replacing them, but expanding the horizon 360 degrees around them. AudiR10 is 100% right that you can't be the primary child-rearing parent and also function successfully in the Perpetual Emergency environment of many of today's workplaces. But it's also true that you can be happy and successful and economically engaged with the world WITHOUT following one of those cookie-cutter "work for a firm" career paths.

Beyond that, the economy can be supercharged by people who aren't "working for a firm." This is something our Council of Economic Advisors and Federal Reserve Board haven't figured out yet. Their interest rate policies are designed to make it more attractive to invest in industrial-model big business than to hold wealth in property equity, and draw on it to create new small businesses.

The times are a-changin'. That's OK. Off-ramping is one aspect of the change.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.