Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Tuesday, November 21, 2000
They've got my number
by
Jacob Sullum
0
Jacob Sullum's Email
|
Jacob Sullum
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?
Improvment
Detriment
We'll have to wait and see
Improvment (2 %)
Detriment (97 %)
We'll have to wait and see (2 %)
I have a confession to make. The other day, I was reading about a recently enacted New York law that, starting next spring, will prohibit telemarketers from calling phone numbers on a list maintained by the state's Consumer Protection Board. Before I had finished the article, I was visiting the board's Web site to "pre-register" my home and work numbers. I did not pause to consider whether this was an appropriate use of government power. In fact, the idea that a telemarketer could be fined up to $2,000 for interrupting my work or my dinner made me smile. Apparently, many New Yorkers feel the same way. More than 180,000 have already signed up for the state's "do not call" list. But after I submitted the online form, my conscience started to bother me. I have often criticized people who assume that because they are annoyed their rights have been violated -- the sort who automatically run to the government to get rid of whatever bothers them, whether it's ATM fees, strip joints, or secondhand smoke. Wasn't I guilty of the same sin? Upon reflection, I was hard-pressed to explain why I was justified in using the threat of a fine to avoid unwanted telephone solicitations. After all, I was aware of this hazard when I decided to get telephone service, so in that sense I consented to it. Then, too, I could avoid telemarketers by screening all my calls through my answering machine. I could pay for caller ID and refuse to answer calls from unfamiliar numbers or from lines that block identification. I could buy one of those little devices that you attach to your phone and press to hang up on telemarketers after playing a message telling them not to call you again. Still, it's hard to shake the feeling that I shouldn't have to take such measures. This is my telephone, my home, my office. I feel similarly indignant about the wads of circulars and menus that people periodically leave on our front porch. Sure, I can throw them out, but why should I have to? I don't want them, and I didn't ask for them. My sense of trespass is not quite as strong when it comes to junk mail, even though the principle ought to be the same. It's still trash, whether it's dropped on my doorstep by some guy on a bike or delivered by the U.S. Postal Service. These solicitations are undeniably rude, but that does not necessarily mean they should be illegal. To make the case for banning or restricting the direct marketing that irritates so many of us, you need more than a gut reaction. Writing earlier this year in the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Ross D. Petty, a professor of marketing law at Babson College, argues that "the right to be left alone should include, when feasible, the right to be free from unwanted marketing solicitations." Although that sounds like a moral claim, Petty's argument is based mainly on the premise that it's inefficient to let businesses impose direct marketing costs, such as the hassle of dealing with telephone pitches or throwing out junk mail, on consumers. Telemarketers have to place 50 or more calls to make one sale. It's cost-effective for them, Petty argues, only because they do not have to take into account the inconvenience suffered by the 49 people who weren't interested in the product. Petty proposes a system, administered by phone companies, in which telemarketers would have to pay you for your time. Similarly, he thinks you should be able to return junk mail to the senders, who would have to pick up the postage and would therefore have a bigger incentive to purge unreceptive addresses from their lists. "The purpose of these recommendations is to shift property rights for soliciting ... to the consumers themselves, which would thereby reduce the marketing costs imposed on consumers without their consent," Petty writes. "By reducing marketing clutter, these recommendations should make marketing communications more efficient and effective. ... Marketers will pay more for each consumer contact, but each contact will be an interested customer." Whether or not Petty's economic argument holds water, there remains the question of whether this is a situation where using force to get your way is justified. I'm inclined to think it's not, but maybe that's only because I haven't heard from any telemarketers today.
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at
Reason
magazine and a contributing columnist on Townhall.com.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Jacob Sullum's column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
©Creators Syndicate
News Articles On This Topic
Giuliani not running for NY Senate or governor
White House prods Iran over nuclear deadline
White House confident of health overhaul enactment
Keep IRS auditors away: Earn less than $200,000
Pain before gain in health care overhaul
Ala. Dem defects to GOP over health care, policy
Dems, White House predict success on health care
Report: Campaign finance laws full of loopholes
FAA reminds employees to act with decorum
No peeking: Obama getting Christmas 'sports stuff'
Popular Articles By
Sullum
Obama's Hidden Fees
The Clarity of False Choices
These Boots Are Made for Talking
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
0
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
(
Read all 0 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
You Will Subsidize Abortion
posted at 04:53 PM
Wash Times: Nelson Sold His Soul On Abortion Amendment
posted at 01:26 PM
Two Republicans Withdraw Endorsement of Crist
posted at 01:16 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The First Team Hour 1
posted on:12/19/2009
Today's Columns
Kudlow :
The Yield Curve Is Signalin...
Patterson :
Obama's Forgotten Health...
Greenberg :
It's Still a Wonderful L...
Olasky :
Manhattan Microcosm
Charen :
Maximum Achievable Damage
Feulner :
A Hand Up, Not a Hand Out
Prager :
Democrats Ensure America Wi...
Lukas :
Failing Public Schools Cost ...
Saunders :
A Cool Wind Braces the Ho...
Norris :
Away With the Manger
Adams :
Apology to a Sociology Stude...
Benson :
The Department of Injustice
Blackwell :
Senator J. Wellington Wi...
Thomas :
Snow Jobs
Sowell :
The "Science" Mantra
Limbaugh :
Obamacare Hazardous to Am...
MacKinnon :
A Warning and a Ray of H...
Schlafly :
Cut the Power of the Fami...
Hagelin :
One Solitary Life
Buchanan :
America's Party
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
MARGERY A. BECK : Neb.'s Nelson sees backlash on health reform plan
MARK WILLIAMS : Gas could be the cavalry in global warming fight
PETE YOST : Obama plan could limit records hidden from public
Today's Cartoons
Tuesday, Dec. 22
Michael Ramirez
Gary Varvel
Lisa Benson
Eric Allie
More