Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Jackie Gingrich Cushman :: Townhall.com Columnist
Immune to Reality
by Jackie Gingrich Cushman
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



In the 1960’s, General Motors held more than 60 percent of the United States market share in cars.  This past week, the American taxpayers, (via the U.S. Treasury), became the majority owner (60 percent) of the Vehicle Acquisition Company, soon to be renamed the General Motors Company.  “By the end of the year, the government will have poured $50 billion of taxpayer money into the automaker,” according to the New York Times article (July 10) that bore the headline: “With Sale of Good Assets, G.M. Out of Bankruptcy.” The plan calls for GM maintaining a market share of 15 percent to 17 percent.

This is just the latest in a string of activities that, little by little, is immunizing the American public to accept government intervention, despite our historic tradition rejecting it.  It’s the culmination of the idea that this is the way it has to be because the company is too big to fail. The overall assumption is that the government will make sure that the taxpayers will be taken care of.

Special offer: Jackie Cushman and Newt Gingrich's book free when you subscribe to Townhall Magazine

America’s history is one of personal responsibility, entrepreneurship and innovation, risk-taking and hard work. 

Government – “more, bigger, better” might be the new slogan.

The current budget, which President Obama has touted as halving the deficit over time, does so only because it first triples it.  The current budget plan has the debt increasing from a total of $10 trillion last year to more than $16 trillion in 2012.

This spending of our money continues.  According to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report regarding TARP money, “As of June 30, 2009, … Treasury has approximately $328 billion remaining under the almost $700 billion limit.”  The result is that the Congress is now arguing how to best allocate that remaining money.

The Associated Press recently reported that “American International Group Inc. is consulting with the federal government about its plans to pay millions of dollars in retention incentives and bonuses.”  The credit facility for the company – another company labeled too big to fail -- has increased from $85 billion last September to $182.5 billion today.  “Too big to fail” has turned into “too big to manage without government approval.”

Another recent government encroachment is a tax increase masquerading as an environmental solution.  According to the Wall Street Journal, (“The Cap and Tax Fiction”, June 26), the Waxman-Markey bill represents “the biggest tax in American history.”  What better way to get a tax passed than to say it’s good for Mother Nature.

While the Obama administration is persistently moving the country leftward through policies, Gallup has recently reported that, “Americans, by a 2-to-1 margin, say their political views in recent years have become more conservative… all three major partisan groups indicate that their views have shifted to the right.”

So, while the country is moving to the right, the administration is moving in the opposite direction. The Gallup report concludes that, “for those seeking to understand why the Republican Party suffered such major election losses, they may find that political ideology has very little to do with it.”

What does it have to do with then? Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Jackie Cushman is a freelance writer who lives in Atlanta, Georgia. Her column also runs later in the week in the Northside Neighbor.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Just A Point of Clarification
It's possible for this reader of the article by Jackie Gringrich Cushman to be left with the impression that a 2 to1 change toward a more conservative tendency America has occurred during the Obama Presidency. But, the polling question was worded in a way that asked the subjects to compare their view with that of the past few years. So, the poll does not necessarily indicate a massive change to radical conservatism over the last few months; but possibly a comparative change over a period of years.
[http://www.gallup.com/poll/121403/Special-Report-Ideologically-Moving.aspx]
Those results not withstanding the election of Barack Obama.

It also does not take into account the 'qualitative' difference in the conservative change that may have occurred. For example, on a scale of 1 to 10, what is the degree of change? Some who answered in the affirmative that “their view had become more conservative in the past few years”, doesn't say that the change in point of view is great enough to make an ideological change—in other words, how many liberals and moderates actually made a shift that would make a difference ideologically. And the largest component of those who have become more conservative were conservatives in the first place; so this segment doesn't represent an ideological change at all, since they were conservative in the first place.

Upon examination of the Gallup report listed above, you will notice a reversal in the percentage of popularity of some traditionally conservative issues; and, on balance, a similar reversal has occurred on some liberal issues. These mixed outcomes only confirm the suggestion that this study does not represent an unequivocal trend toward conservatism—which Ms. Cushman's article may suggest to some.




Him An' Me
Says:

While I admire and agree with the logic and conclusions of the article, I suggest we look closely at two words which have become interchangeable. Principles and values are not synonymous. Principles are fundamental specific truths or laws. They do not fluctuate repeatedly. Values do fluctuate (often rapidly) as needs and/or desires evolve. Values are relative. It is my sense that Governor Sarah Palin’s positions are rooted firmly in principles, whereas President Barack H. Obama’s positions are based on the relativity of changing values. Have we forgotten Values Clarification? I hope not."
____________________________
EXCELLENT POST! I wish more people understood the very important distinction you are making here.

The consultants and pundits refer to the 'values voters' which is another of those amorphous political phrases such as 'community values' - meant to conjure up visions, get some political traction but actually mean nothing.

Obotman can talk of 'values' but, from his policies and acts, he actually stands for some pretty ugly things: economic destruction and control, degrading the nation internationally, divide and control domestically based on race/class warfare politics, extension of his power through lies and intimidation, etc.

This is what he 'values' and are his values, none of which is based on principle.

Hitler was a man who had 'values'. He valued the political expediency obtained from race based politics - and he also valued exterminating his racial ('inferior') enemies.

Hitler wasn't burdened much with 'principle' either.

So much for 'values voters'.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.