Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, May 25, 2009
Jackie Gingrich Cushman :: Townhall.com Columnist
Work Hard for A Nation of Makers not Takers
by Jackie Gingrich Cushman
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Strong economic growth is good, it makes people better off both today and tomorrow. An increase in prosperity today boosts optimism about future prospects. The current administration’s prescription for economic growth is putting more government money into the economy, and reaching into industry (insurance, banking, car manufacturers, credit card companies, and healthcare), in an attempt to boost economic activity and control the economy.

The overarching message is this: that average, everyday people are not able to make wise decisions about what is best for them, so let’s create more government structure and regulations and make decisions for them. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said in an interview with Charlie Gibson regarding the budget that in the first 100 days the administration "began to put the foundation down to altering it fundamentally.” The new foundation is broad intervention.

How does the administration propose to pay for such broad intervention? By taking. Taking through increased taxes (one of the proposed funding strategies for Obama’s healthcare plan would be to tax people who currently have health benefits to pay for benefits for those people who do not), and taking from the future by increasing publicly held debt. Obama’s budget more than doubles the debt, from $10 trillion (in 2008 dollars) to $23 trillion in 2019.

But he’s wrong. Instead of figuring out how to take from others through taxes and debt, we should be figuring out how to make. We should encourage people to figure out how to start new businesses, create new products and provide services to others. People-driven advances, not government-driven.

What’s going to happen if our country moves down this path of taking - not making? People who were formerly hardworking and self-reliant will become soft, complaining, indolent. The economy will suffer, as will our people. Just look at Britain in the 1970’s.

It’s not just about economic growth – it’s about how it is achieved. Do we want our children to dream of working hard and being successful – or of finding the right way to tax, take or borrow from others? In my new book, “5 Principles for a Successful Life: From Our Family to Yours,” written with my father Newt Gingrich, Principle 2 is “Work Hard.” My life has created an appreciation of the value of hard work.

During my grammar school years, my father was a college professor who perpetually ran for Congress. My mother taught high school math. My first job (non-paying) was handing out bumper stickers and brochures for my father in shopping centers throughout the rural 6th district of Georgia. It was hard for people to turn away a 7-year-old girl asking to “please vote for my Daddy.”

After six years of campaigning (and losing twice), my father won. The last year he ran, he borrowed money so he and my mother could campaign full-time, while my grandmother stayed with my sister and me. We never went hungry, but there was not much money. My mother tracked our expenses down to the penny.

My first paying job was cleaning bathrooms at the First Baptist Church of Carrollton. A bit conflicted over whether to be proud that people noticed how clean the bathrooms were or embarrassed that they knew that I cleaned them for money, I was however glad to get a paycheck every two weeks.

My second paying job? A skating waitress at the Sonic Drive-In. The first day on the job I spilled a Strawberry Shake over a car. It was a rough start but I improved.

Working was never optional for me. In high school, I babysat, worked as a bank teller and scooped ice cream into cones. I saved much of what I made to pay for college (loans and my parents helped too). Once in college, I worked the switchboard answering calls before making my way to the fraternity court for fun.

Summers during college included working one, sometimes two jobs at a time, and saving money for the fall semester ahead. I graduated during the recession of the late 1980’s. Unable to find a job, I went back to school and earned my MBA in finance, accruing more debt.

I finished in 1990, tens of thousands of dollars in debt. But by now I had better credentials and the economy was doing better, too. I began working full-time as a valuation consultant and also began working toward earning the Chartered Financial Analyst Designation. After three years and many hours of study, I earned it. Since then, I have continued to work hard.

On a personal level, I have always found hard work to be good for the soul. It is good to be helpful, to provide service, to make products for others.

It is my belief that this is also true at the national level -- that we are best as a nation of makers, not takers.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Jackie Cushman is a freelance writer who lives in Atlanta, Georgia. Her column also runs later in the week in the Northside Neighbor.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
The Worst Part and the Funny Part
The government already took control of the banks... or was it the banks, who already took control of the governemnt???

Bill Clinton and the Dems arranged for, practically ordered, banks to inflate the economy by 2.4 trillion - and that's just in subprime mortgage loans.

What do you think they did with credit card companies? Answer: the exact same thing. Government and ACORN: "I don't care how poor this black family is, you will give them a credit card, or we'll sue you." BANKS: "No problem, we'll pretend we're making money."

The hammer on the Credit Obomination has yet to drop. But when it does, you can bet that you and I will pay for more government intervention in our economy.

The worst part of it is that the government has so jacked with the economy that they have no idea how to fix it.

The funny part of it is that we just missed an opportunity to reset the clock. Uncle Sam could have painlessly given us the bailout money - it would have been cheaper by far - and then let us pick the NEW winners and losers in the NEW economy. The winners would have been many, many, many, and the losers would have been the same companies that are going to lose as soon as Uncle Sam (you and I) stops paying their way. An example: General Democratic Unionized Motors. They're doomed.

Of course, with this plan, Congress would have lost its ability to throw away money on John Murtha backup runways. And when you throw away money, a bunch of it finds its way back into the pockets of the Chosen Ones.

American Revolution by 2012 - Celente
This guy is pretty damn accurate with his predictions:

http://www.infowars.com/celente-predicts-revolution-food-ri ots-tax-rebellions-by-2012/

In case you think he's a nutjob, here's what major MSM media say about Gerald Celente:

“When CNN wants to know about the Top Trends, we ask Gerald Celente.”
— CNN Headline News

“A network of 25 experts whose range of specialties would rival many university faculties.”
— The Economist

“Gerald Celente has a knack for getting the zeitgeist right.”
— USA Today

“There’s not a better trend forecaster than Gerald Celente. The man knows what he’s talking about.”
- CNBC

“Those who take their predictions seriously … consider the Trends Research Institute.”
— The Wall Street Journal

“Gerald Celente is always ahead of the curve on trends and uncannily on the mark … he’s one of the most accurate forecasters around.”
— The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

“Mr. Celente tracks the world’s social, economic and business trends for corporate clients.”
— The New York Times

“Mr. Celente is a very intelligent guy. We are able to learn about trends from an authority.”
— 48 Hours, CBS News

“Gerald Celente has a solid track record. He has predicted everything from the 1987 stock market crash and the demise of the Soviet Union to green marketing and corporate downsizing.”
— The Detroit News

“Gerald Celente forecast the 1987 stock market crash, ‘green marketing,’ and the boom in gourmet coffees.”
— Chicago Tribune

“The Trends Research Institute is the Standard and Poors of Popular Culture.”
— The Los Angeles Times

“If Nostradamus were alive today, he’d have a hard time keeping up with Gerald Celente.”
— New York Post

So there you have it - hardly a nutjob conspiracy theorist blowhard now is he? The price of not heeding his warnings will be far greater than the cost of preparing for the future now. Storable food and gold are two good places to make a start.

Take back the government...
...I read the article on the first (this is the second)thread I was on.I was not impressed with his predictions.Too general and too far in the future.What I want to know is,who is going to win the Super Bowl next year.Most economic "predictions" are just stock market realities.Yes,the market is going to go down.And,yes, the market is going to go up.What else is new?

The reality is that no one knows what the stock market is going to do.If they did,they would own all the money in the world.And please spare me "trends".Everything can be put into a "trend".Hind site is 20/20.The future is blind.

I agree - but how do we get there?
I'd like to work for a nation of makers. Jackie Gingrich Cushman has that right, but her article doesn't address what to do to make the nation over to one of makers and not takers. And it ignores the fact that we've a voting block of takers that now exceeds the makers. Unfortunately, the Republicans also contributed to this by supporting the expansion of government (e.g. Prescription drug benefit, and the TSA to name two).

The fact is the federal government needs to get out of the welfare business. Democrats think Republicans are heartless. Yet what they do is worse: taking money from Paul for Peter's welfare is theft. Thieves are worse and more immoral than so called heartless people who don't support government welfare and prefer private charity. And studies have shown that Republicans are more charitable than Democrats! But Republicans also need to eliminate corporate welfare, another form of theft. Many (perhaps most) in both parties seems to be providing government favors to their campaign contributors. We need to roll back the scope of government.

As they say, the only way to get money out of politics is to get politics out of business. And that would be government funding of business and government funding of welfare. Neither are any business of government.

The only way to achieve this is to vote for and elect politiicians who support these ideas. And there are few Democrats or Republicans who do. Ron Paul is one. As for me, I'm voting Libertarian unless one of the major party candidates supports these positions as shown by their actions (not their words). For if we vote for an evil, that's what we'll get and what we'll deserve.


Hard Work
Work hard build a "nest-egg" for retirement. Then along comes BIG Government to devour your nest-egg, tear up your nest, and destroy your children in our government schools. How big must your retirement fund be? What form should you maintain it in? Our government changes the rules too fast for us to keep up and the tax structure is so fluid it is like carrying water in your hands--your planned for future just keeps disappearing no matter how hard you try to hold it together. Our Government has become a predator in our lives and it is killing us all.

Re Wise Decisions
I kind of stopped dead at the sentence saying that "average, everyday people" don't make wise decisions so the government steps in and makes decisions for them. So? You may have the right to stay drunk all the time, but few would argue that this is wise.

1) Currently we have in the news the case of a mother who has run away with her cancer-patient 12 year-old son to avoid his getting medical treatment that doctors say has a 90% chance of curing him or at least putting his cancer in remission. Is Mother wise to do this?

2) In spite of overwhelming evidence that a diet high in fat and sugar causes medical problems and shortens life, many Americans eat heavily of such a diet. Are they wise?

3) Ditto ditto, smoking cigarettes and cigars and pipes, dipping snuff, and chewing tobacco. Wise?

4) Evidence exists that high-speed driving correlates positively with accident rate. Should drivers, in their wisdom, decide at what speed they wish to drive, with no speed limits? How about texting, reading a novel, or painting fingernails while driving? Wise decisions?

5) Daily newspaper: parent drowns child, parent poisons child, father stomps toddler to death, mother stands by while boyfriend beats child to death, handicapped child found starved to death. Parents' decisions are necessarily wise, and no government agency should intervent to protect the child?

6) Emergency room. Motorcycle crash victim. Dead of head trauma. No helmet. Wise?

In every example, there is a cost to society---a danger---and not just to the individual who had his own way. Government runs society (that's what it's for). A responsible government makes decisions for the benefit of society. Especially when individual decisions can be stunningly UNwise.

To Fantasy Control
Re "The government could have given US the money"---do you remember what happened in Katrina when the Bush administration, out of Conservative conviction that individuals knew best what they needed in the emergency, gave loaded credit cards directly to individuals? You can probably still google for details on that. Many blew the lot on a big TV etc---no such nonsense as using the money for food, medicine, clothing.

Thank You
to all our Servicemen and women on this Memorial Day.
and by the way, lillypad...go away and lie by your dish, you ignorant sl--

Lilly: Individual Decisions
Lilly, yes many individuals make unwise decisions regarding themselves and their families. But many more don't. And yes laws and government will need to step in at times when people are harming themselves or others.

But you extrapolate these examples to give creedence to the notion that we should rely on government more than on ourselves and those close to us. Such reliance will only make it less likely that people WILL make wise decisions.

I find this idea that government knows better than me and that I should let them run my life 100% to be highly insulting. It is ideas like yours that will make people more like "takers instead of "makers".

Lilly makes a good point...
...although she doesn't know it.

When you haven't WORKED HARD to earn the money, you don't value it and are more likely to make bad decisions with it.

But as a good I-know-what's-good-for-you socialist, her critique is not against the poor slob who frittered away the gift, it's against the giver. And the solution--though unwritten--it to make more rules about how you can spend the money.

Apparently her momma never read her Aesop's fable of the ant and the grasshopper.

Government does not run society, nor is
Government is subservient to its Society of members. Government is the manifestation of the social contract between its members. In the case of the Federal Government the members are the States; and in the case of the States members are the citizens. The function of government is to protect its members from the actions of other “Government/Entities” that would seek to infringe on the liberties of its members. At its most basic level those liberties are life, liberty and property (pursuit of happiness.)

A Memorial to my Family Members

At my insistence, my Siblings and their Spouses wrote their autobiography. Here is a sentence or two from two of my Sisters husband’s, my three brothers, and a comment about my service of the USA.

Two of them fought throughout the South Pacific War, New Guiana, Philippines, Saipan, Iwo Jima and more. Two fought in North Africa, Normandy, Battle of the Bulge, and Mt Cassino in Italy.

Brother-in- law Harold (Army in South Pacific) === “Later on I had the good fortune of being a guard at General Homma’s and General Yomasheitia's trials. I saw them both convicted of war crimes.”

Brother Paul (Army, From Normandy to Battle of the Bulge) === “I think it was sometime in early March they had a special company meeting and presented me with the Bronze Star Medal.”

Brother Jesse (Naval Officer in the Pacific) === “We sunk two small ships at Iwo Jima, one in the East Boat Basin. Christmas night the Japanese retaliated.”.

Brother-in-law Gus (Army in N. Africa, then to Naples and Mt. Cassino, and more) === “We battled up to Cassino. This place set on top of a mountain the Germans could look down on us. There was quite a battle before we took it.”

Brother John (Merchant Marine, Army) === "In the Merchant Marine, taking supplies and troops from New York to Le Havre, France, then in the Army."

Brother Jim - me - (Ohio State Guard, Merchant Marine, Army twice ) === “In 1951, I was a secret spy for the FBI, looking for members of the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg spy ring.”

Trivia -Brother John joined the Army in 1946, he wanted to earn the GI Bill of Rights, to pay for College. I met him there, the Army man said, “Why don’t you go with him?” So I did. I never went back to milk the cows that night.

I spent my 18th birthday on a troop ship in the harbor at Singapore.

I was in the Ohio State Guard Band at age 16.. Most Band Members were in their 70’s, so some of us averaged a legal age for the State Guard.

Response to Lilly
"do you remember what happened in Katrina when the Bush administration, out of Conservative conviction that individuals knew best what they needed in the emergency, gave loaded credit cards directly to individuals?"

How on earth is taking money from one person and giving it to another person who did not earn it conservative? That episode only proves how extremely unwise it is to give people money they did not earn.

It galls me to hear liberals decry Bush as a hard-core conservative laissez-faire president but in the same breath declare that he doubled the debt (usually as a rational for tripling the debt). So which is it - he doubled the debt or he is laissez-faire (hint - the debt was doubled)?

Lily:
Yes, Lily, people make foolish choices every day. And they will continue to do so, on a macro level, people spending money on what they want is how our economy has grown to become the largest and strongest in history.

People who supply that need would become a few of the winners in that new economy. And when that money ran out, they'd move on. Supply and demand.

Foolish spending would dwindle, however, if there wasn't a government that kept bailing out fools. They would learn, they would get jobs. Teaching people to invest in themselves doesn't happen by giving them unlimited welfare -- or by giving them houses for as little as their signature.

Noboby spends more foolishly, however, than government, which is the source of most of this nation's problem. They gave 2.4 trillion in free housing to low income types who are able to walk away from them easier than they can walk on an apartment rental. Why? No money down, (i.e., no deposit.) It was a stupid idea that resulted in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac collapses and a worldwide economic recession.

We are "Makers, not takers"!!
You said, in one profound statement, “we are best as a nation of makers, not takers!” This was to me, what my saddened heart has been trying to say to a president who I fear does not hear us, nor does he choose to.
He speaks of “Immigration” as if it really means something to him. It does, but not for the reason these people trusted in him. They really felt that he wanted to help them. He does not. I believe this is the farthest thing from his intentions and he actually looks upon them as a tool. Unfortunately for them, an “uneducated tool”. One that he can lie to. Because for the most part, these people are not educated to a level that would allow them to understand what he is attempting to use them for, which is voting. They are simply a “means to an end”. In his case, the presidency. Now, it will be his second term in office and we will hear the lies all over again. How much of a lost sole do you have to be to use people because you are hurt yourself? Is it truly because his father abandoned him? Is there more to this than meets the eye? Certainly, he realizes after much conversation he too was a means to an end by the Democratic Party. They used him just like he is using the people to get what he now claims is “his” now, this country.
Unfortunately, when someone does this, and he is unveiled as the unscrupulous modifier of lies to justify his greed, people will turn on him and his victory will be tainted forever through history books as rotten fruit. His future will be worse than his past. People can be very unforgiving when they realize they have been taken advantage of in the worst way, trust.
He claims no love of his country, nor his God. He is a sad replica of a man in power. His legacy will weigh heavily one day on his dear, sweet, unsuspecting daughters whom people will hold equally as guilty. Does he never think of them? Many of us truly believe, he only wants to hurt this country, and he's doing a dam good job of it!

Or in the words of JFK (via Voltaire)
Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.

Great story!
Thanks for sharing, Ms. Cushman. It isn't just finances, I am also worried about the impact dependency on the government will have on the people. I went to Russia shortly after their initial foray into capitalism. A pretty educated person shared her worry with me: "who will take care of us?" It didn't dawn on her that she could take care of herself.

Think About This
One party says that it should be a right a wooman to have the right to "choose" whether to have a baby or not to have a baby. So, to that party the right of the individual is paramount in this particular case. Now, let us switch to health insurance. The questions is, if a woman should have the "choice" in whether to have a child or not, then is it consistent to "force" someone else to have health insurance? Which is the more morally important issue?

Loved this, Jackie!
It got me thinking about my own work background. You are right, hard work is good for the soul. I think the times in my life when I have been most satisfied were the times I worked the hardest.

I entered the workforce when I was 14. My parents didn’t believe in handing me money. I wanted to keep up with kids in my school who were much higher up the economic ladder than I, so I went to work.

I remember when I was in my forties, my husband was a salesman who worked on commission. Sometimes we were in tall cotton, and other times we could barely make the house payment. I was working full time, and I had the opportunity to get an additional part-time job. I wondered if I could work two jobs at my age. The phrase “Make hay while the sun shines” kept going through my mind. I decided if I could do it, I should.

I took on the part-time job, and worked one full-time job and one part-time job for a total of about 65 hours a week. I actually didn’t get any more tired than I did working one job. I guess my body provided the energy that I demanded of it. During that time I had a very high level of self esteem. I knew I was helping my family and my husband. When I told people I worked two jobs, they were very impressed by my industriousness, and I had the satisfaction of knowing I could depend on myself for what was needed.

takebackthegovernment No. 2
.
Thanks for the tip on Celente.

I was unaware of him, sputt, sputt, sputter..
.

"People not able to make wise decisions"
This article said this, above, statement is the "overarching message" of what Obummer has been doing.

Duh. That is EXACTLY he became president! The average person is not wise enough to make wise decisions!

Ms Kelly
Very interesting post.

There are still young folks who work, but the opportunity to work at a young age is limited, unlawful or not desired.

My best friend and I had our first job at the age of seven for me and eight for him. We rode horses pulling hay shocks with a rope and pole affair to build hay stacks. The mountains were too steep for a hay bailer and there wasn't but two or three in the whole country anyway.

We had jobs on farms or in the woods until we grew up -- otherwise, we'd not have had any spending money, nor could we have bought our ragged, old car when we reached driving age.

Every boy and girl with whom I grew up worked at something, usually in addition to whatever work they were required to do at home.

I remember my first day in boot camp. It was snowing and sleeting and there were several hundred folks standing in lines to eat breakfast. Everybody was complaining, except me. I thought: "The Navy can't be too bad -- I don't have to feed fifty head of cattle!"

Some might think it strange, but everybody with whom I grew up were successful in life and all of us were sorta poor as children -- farm kids, mostly.

No longer Nation of hard workers
Anone who voted for Obama wasn't thinking about working hard for personal achievements. Where did those values go? Parents?...care to explain?

Tales from my Grandfather

My father died when I was young and my maternal Grandfather took it upon himself to help raise me and be my male role model.

He owned a small construction company that poured concrete, laid stone, bricks and blocks.

Every summer I worked for him as a laborer - pushing wheelbarrows of mortar, supplying the masons with whatever the need was.

On one particularly hot day in August, one of the black masons said to my Grandfather - "You're working that boy to hard" - my Grandfathers response - "If he doesn't learn anything else, I want him to know how to work hard".

One day when I was pushing a wheelbarrow full of concrete, my Grandfather stopped me and said "Son, do you want to do this for the rest of your life?" - I said "No Sir" - he said "Remember, others may know more, others may have more experience, others may get more breaks in life, but you will be able to out work them".

I learned that hard work was good for you.

Years later while working on a computer program, I found myself in a position of having less experience than others on the team, I recalled my Grandfathers words, and simply outworked them.

My First Car

I complained to my Grandfather that I was about the only kid who didn't have a car on my football team.

We went to a used car dealer who was a friend of his.

I saw this beautiful used Chevrolet coupe and said "Granddad that is the car I want".

He negotiated the deal and I was almost delirious with joy. I drove to his house and was so proud I thought "I can't wait for the other guys to see my new car".

He had the garage door open when I arrived and motioned for me to park the car in the garage.

He locked the garage door and asked for the keys.

He said "Now you have something to work for, when the car is paid for, you will own it."

I was so mad at him I couldn't see straight - I worked every hour I could and asked for more hours.

Several months later, he said we were even and he unlocked the garage and gave me the keys to the car.

I learned that dreams came true if you worked hard and earned it.

Hard Lesson from My Grandfather

I was 18 years old and a football player and weight lifter.

My Grandfather was 70 years old and still working hard everyday.

We went to his home for lunch and I had been bragging about how strong I was.

He looked across the table after lunch and said "You want to arm wrestle?", I said "That wouldn't be fair at your age".

I learned a lesson that day - NEVER arm wrestle a man who has worked laying stone his entire life - My arm still hurts when I think about that day.

Responsibility the Dividing Line

The smallest minority in America is the individual citizen. Conservatives are those who perpetuate the concept of self determination and personal achievement.

Liberals believe that minorities are 'Collectives' of minorities that represent, different races, genders, economic classes, sexual orientations and those oppressed by any group in power etc.

The dividing line in America is NOT Democrat or Republican, black or white, but rather who is responsible for each individual citizens actions and decisions.

Approximately 1/2 the country 'Thinks', each individual citizen is responsible for their own decisions and actions.

Approximately 1/2 the country 'Feels', that someone or something, is responsible for the individual citizens decisions and actions, NOT THE INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN.

This dividing line transcends political parties, races, creeds, economic status and is the reason America is in the shape it is currently experiencing, in all areas of life.

Whether one is a CEO or a janitor, practices abortion rather than birth control, engages in sex perversion or not, each individual citizen is responsible for their own actions and decisions.

Some Republicans and MOST Democrats 'Feel' that if someone works at McDonald's and make $250 dollars a week and then buys a $750,000 dollar home, it is NOT their fault when they cannot make the payments and the taxpayers should help them out.

When someone has 8 kids, with 8 different fathers - they are responsible for their own actions and decisions but some Republicans and most Democrats 'Feel' the taxpayer should help them out.

I believe that Conservatives are those who demand personal responsibility and Liberals are those who believe that personal irresponsibility, must have a safety net.

Working hard and being willing
to work hard is a virtue. I'm glad that my dad instilled that attribute in my sisters and I when we were growing up. Even though as teens we grumbled when he made us do yard work, I now thank him when I work in my own garden and realize where my appreciation for gardening came from. My sisters and I usually baby sat, saved our dough and used it to buy clothes, shoes and whatever we needed that we could afford. There was no asking Dad for money--it just wasn't an option.

I spent all of my grown up life working outside the home, and while raising a family completed a college degree and a master's degree. I'm still paying off educational loans. No one handed me a free ride--I accomplished my goals because I was taught to work for what you wanted---and that it was up to you to get where you wanted to go.

I'm glad that I was a maker. I wish the same for others! This is the only way they will come to know their true worth and even more to value the concepts upon which this great country was founded.

Thanks Ms. Cushman for a great column and for reminding us all that it is honorable to be a maker!!!

Nothing new
The Labour Charter of 1927, by the Grand Council of Fascism, in article 7: "The corporative State considers private initiative, in the field of production, as the most efficient and useful instrument of the Nation", and in article 9: "State intervention in economic production may take place only where private initiative is lacking or is insufficient, or when are at stakes the political interest of the State. This intervention may take the form of control, encouragement or direct management."


Ms Cushman
Nice article. It's rather gratifying to hear someone speak the obvious for a change.

I've often said I grew up in one world, but I never got to live in it. The world changed that quick. One world that had common sense, to a world with no sense.

How did we get from Ozzie and Harriet Nelson, to Ozzie and Sharon Osbourne.

Go figure.

Retired Geek
I've often read your comments since becoming a member of town hall but I've never responded to them.
I'd just like to say your comments are well thought out and uplifting.

Thanks for time.

08hayabusa

Thank you very much!

I really appreciate your comments as well.

Jackie
I cant believe your father would stoop so low as to have you handing out bumper stickers!!!!! I am kidding of course, I have the greatest respect for your father and you. You are true american patriots. Maybe you should run with Sarah in 2012. You two would be hard to beat. Think about it. and God Bless you and yours. Gene

Dawn
My goodness girl you hit that nail on the head the first time. Very well written and the truth. I started working when I was very young helping out on 2 grandparents farms. When I was 13 I was filling hundred pound sacks of grain at the feed mill after school. I worked thr farms in the summer for $20 a week. This was mid 60s in Michigan where you could see a movie for 30 cents. If you had 2 dollars you could put gas in the car and take your girlfriend to the movies. I paid $40 for my first car and it needed a transmission which I bought used and put in myself. Today kids dont know how to check there oil or change a tire. Except my children can, even my daughter can. She will also kick your but if you give her any static. 8 years of kickboxing did that for her. God save our country from the left but only when the people wake up and say no more!!!!!!!!!!

amnesty means 100 million new takers
One often hears about how hard-working ILLEGAL aliens are, which seems true on the surface.

BUT does that mean that ON BALANCE they are net contributors?

The answer according to Heritage is just the opposite-- they become HUGE net users of resources. This has to do with 2 key things-- (1) ILLEGALS generally come here poor and typically ignorant (6th grade education), AND (2) America is a MUCH different place than it was 100 years ago.

Today America is an advanced service economy. What that means is that the ignorant indigent CANNOT come here and expect upward mobility. Instead, the typical poor family will devour $1.4 MILLION more in services than it EVER pays in any form of taxes over a lifetime. Worse still, there are myriad social pathologies which go with ILLEGAL aliens.

Amnesty for 12 million, as now proposed AGAIN in Congress, would mean 100 million new indigent ignorant over 20 years at a cost of $2.6 TRILLION, and myriad concomitant social pathologies (crimes, drugs, gangs, illegitimacy's, barrio blight, bilingual dysfunction, welfare fraud, school enervation).

See what YOU can do just below to save America-- while we still have a LITTLE time!


http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1076.cfm
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/SR14es.cfm
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1490.cfm
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm2451.cfm

stop amnesty in Congress!
Congress is holding hearings to work toward a path to scamnesty even though it has been rejected several times over the past couple of years despite HUGE lobbying by the Conspiracy Of Evil (see post to follow).

Find your Senators and Congressmen (and others)... BOOKMARK IT and contact them often!

http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/index.htm

Tell them that you oppose any semblance of amnesty...that you support the SAVE Act... that there should be NO connection between working here ILLEGALLY and a path to citizenship...that it is CRIMINAL to speak of a path to citizenship even as 10% of Americans are unemployed...

And these are the WRONG type of immigrants (poor and ignorant... future social service dependents) for today's advanced service economy in America. We need SOME of the educated and skilled, BUT they should come here LEGALLY.

Tell them that you oppose any semblance of amnesty...that you support the SAVE Act... that there should be NO connection between working here ILLEGALLY and a path to citizenship...that it is CRIMINAL to speak of a path to citizenship even as 10% of Americans are unemployed... that ILLEGALS take good jobs and suppress wages, and at IMMENSE expense to America all-in.

ILLEGALS are the WRONG type of immigrants (poor and ignorant... future social service dependents) for today's advanced service economy in America.

We need SOME of the educated and skilled, BUT they should come here LEGALLY, and want to become Americans, not just milk the system for jobs and freebies!

The Conspiracy of Evil


The biggest challenge to stopping ILLEGAL aliens is that the money and organization (hence power) is mainly on the pro-ILLEGAL side. The pro-ILLEGAL forces include an unlikely, strange bedfellow alliance between groups which want to USE them in different ways--> the Conspiracy Of Evil.

Miscreant employers obviously simply want to exploit their labor-- never mind the myriad, egregious socio-economic problems they foist on America... hence, their all-in costs to society are immense and snowballing. Furthermore, the "savings" to miscreant employers are pocketed by them --> your hotel room or head of lettuce is NO cheaper to YOU.

The PC left wants to get ILLEGALS voting and seize permanent control for leftist "elites" via yet more inexorable big entitlement government... power flows to statist 'Crats/the left when YOUR tax $ flows to Washington. Try to find a liberal who does not really favor scamnesty, while feigning talk about enforcement first.

The scandal-plagued Catholic Church needs replacement bodies for the pews; and ILLEGALS can put more in the collection plates in America than in Mexico... the Church still has mega-millions to pay out for priest perversion (after deciding to forgive each priest one act of perversion-- Jesus!):

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/15/local/me-priests15

Ethnocentric Hispanic groups really do want an effective Reconquista, so they hide behind claims of racism and pleas for PC multiculturalism and one world, NWO kumbaya.

http://www.illegalaliens.us/aztlan.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/mexico_immigration/2007/09 /28/36496.html?s=al&promo_code=3A98-1
http://www.libertygunrights.com/NAUFactSheet.pdf

Finally, the remote elites, including the liberal MSM, do not see what all the fuss is about. Besides, they LIKE their cheap ILLEGAL maids and yard-workers, and THEIR children will not have to go to schools enervated by "those people."

how ILLEGAL aliens see things


Below was a recent post here about how ILLEGAL aliens view their incursion into America, which has been aided and abetted by open border NAU quislings like Presidente Jorge Bush, Amnesty John McCain and the Chamber lobbies-- AND by the big entitlement guvment voter-seeking left like the ObaMessiah:

(slight editing below for clarity)

**********************************************
(post from a Mexifornia resident)

My Take-->

I have many Hispanic friends, and I speak enough Spanish to understand practically all of what I hear. This is what I have found:

Mexicans truly believe that California and much of the U.S. western states were wrongly taken from Mexico. This is THEIR land-- their ancestors were here first, and some can trace their ancestry back to before their land was taken away. Hence, the Reconquista (re-taking, or re-conquering) agenda.

Mexican ILLEGALS truly believe that the U.S. liberals stupidly passed the laws that give them all the freebies: free health care, zero will to enforce immigration laws (cannot ask a Hispanic person for immigration status), and others... and all those laws are there for them. If not for them, then why were they passed?!

The also know that their rate of having children is far greater than that of Anglos. They understand that it is only a matter of time before they become the majority of the voting populace because they are willing to have children.

preventing more net takers


Today's immigrants (legal and ILLEGAL) are similar to those of a century ago, but they are coming to a very different America, one where changes in the economy, society, and government create fundamentally different incentives for newcomers.

In other words, the America that some of our grandparents came to no longer exists. This simple fact must become the starting point for the explosive debate about immigration policy.

Although mass immigration once served our national interests, in today's America it weakens our common national identity, limits opportunities for upward mobility, threatens our security and sovereignty, strains resources for social programs, and disrupts middle-class norms of behavior.

ILLEGAL aliens particularly pervade pernicious social pathologies like a cancer.

So as the politicians argue about border fences and amnesty, they are missing the bigger picture-- the harmful impact of large-scale settlement of all kinds of immigrants, whether legal or illegal, skilled or unskilled, temporary or permanent, European or Latin or Asian or African.

Modern America has simply outgrown wholesale immigration, and we must limit it before it cripples us, and carefully monitor the changes it forces.

oracle1 from GA

You are not the only one who has passed that message. Many latino groups openly promote the same message.

And your right. Latinos do think Liberals are dumb for the hand-outs and freebies but are willing to exploit them as it furthers their goal of retaking the southwest.

From a phlosophical point of view, it is un-realolistic for anyone to believe the United States, as we know it, would last forever. We are now over 200 year old. We have had a good run. Much to be proud of much we preferred never happened. No nation on Earth has ever accomplished so much and done so much good for humanity as the United States.

However, we are living in a time when we will witness the beginnings of the decline of the United States.

We are no longer a nation of laws, no longer a nation of equal justice under the law. As such our confidence and support of this form of government will now begin its decline. At some point in the future, we will look and say this government does not deserve to survive.

This is the path Liberals have taken us.

Clearly Liberals are the takers

This is why they don't respect people who actually produce wealth in our society.

Hard work? Skill? Notice how Liberals tend to gravitate to occupations where hard work and skill are not measurements of success.

Good Government workers are paid the same as bad governemtn workers. Good educators are paid the same as bad educators. Doctors bill the insurance companies the same whether or not they know what they are doing. Researchers skill is based more on the research proposal more than their ability to actually perform valuable and complete research.

Every actor in Hollywood knows another actor who has worked harder, has more skill, and yet has not had the same success in acting.

Its clear, Liberals just don't respect hard work and skill.

Perhaps this is why Liberals support policies that punish people who have worked hard for everything they have.

Middle Class Working Families
Today's Democrats are not looking out for middle class working families.

Democrats fund the "takers" with taxes from middle class working families.

Unions supporting Democrats are not looking out for their own memembrs who are in middle class working families because Democrats take from middle class working families.

That is how things are.

Geek, SeaDog, Ms Kelly et al.
U guys posted the story of my life up to 19 yrs..Except I didn't have a CAR!!
But I had a lot of Pride and Determination. Like Sea Dog, I felt like I was getting a break in Basic Training (Most of the time).
But that was then and THIS IS NOW!! I helped raise two Step-Kids and and I still LOVE to pitch in with a bit of help even tho they don't ask..My two Biological kids are somewhat more competent than most of their 70s era peers, but still don't seem to grasp Total REALITY..I can't blame schools, etc altho they share some of the blame..Bottom Line is: MAYBE WE Gave too much!! RECKON ??

Jackie
Generally, I am in agreement with you for large
parts of any one column. But not so much this
time.

Let's take this sentence: "The overarching message is this: that average, everyday people are not able to make wise decisions about what is best for them." We have a very complex
society. Precious few people are experts
in every aspect of their lives. For instance, who are the ones most likely to
have their assets distributed as they would
like, at the time of their death - those who
go to a lawyer and those with a do-it-yourself
kit?

How many people were taken for a serious
ride during the last couple of years within
the sphere of their investments?

Health Care. I just received a bill for a
recent surgery for $118,000. This was the
hospital bill - not the doctors (of which
there were 3), none of the peripherals, just
the hospital bill for a 3 1/2 day stay.

This is absurd. I also learned this week
that on the average person's insurance bill,
$1000 a year of it is to cover other people's
expenses, who have no insurance or can't pay
their bills.

I have worked all my adult life, either in
a place of business or raising kids, and
sometimes both. My husband started his own
business nearly 30 years and works endlessly.
The single biggest difficulty he has each year
is paying the insurance bill for his employees. It goes up virtually every year
- substantially. I had my first
hospitalization in 30 years, and yet if I
had to go out looking for my own insurance
a year from now when I retire, I would bet
I couldn't get any.

Life isn't fair, but it doesn't hurt to make
it closer to fair than what we have now.
And if you can't live with the word fair,
try a better place to live.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.