Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, December 27, 2007
Hugh Hewitt :: Townhall.com Columnist
John McCain Needs A Neuralyzer: Why McCain Is Performing An Encore, Not An Opening Act
by Hugh Hewitt
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


John McCain needs to get ahold of the producers of Men In Black I and II quick. The only way Arizona's longtime thorn-in-the-side of the GOP can claim the Republican nomination is with a neuralyzer, the device the MIB agents use to selectively erase the memory of civilians who have seen the aliens among us at too close a range.

In fact, he's going to need a lot of them as there's a lot McCain has to hope Republicans forget as they head to the polls in Iowa, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Michigan and beyond.

First, they have to forget that the fundraising advantage the GOP built to counter the Dems' union juggernaut was overthrown by the McCain-Feingold campaign finance "reform," and done so in an unconstitutional fashion, proving not only McCain's indifference to the party's success but also to the idea of Free Speech. This bust of a bill also unleashed the 527s on the land, guaranteeing even more secretive and dirty pool politics. Senator McCain's signal legislative achievement turns out to be deeply flawed constitutionally and counterproductive of its announced goals.

Economic conservatives will also have to have their memories erased of Senator McCain's votes against the Bush tax cuts.

The neuralyzer will also have to get to the social conservatives and erase the memory of John McCain's votes against the Federal Marriage Amendment.

The biggest issues for many Republican voters center on immigration and border security. These voters will have to be persuaded to forget John McCain's ill-fated attempted jam down on immigration which McCain ally Lindsey Graham forced through the Judiciary Committee. Not remembering the bill is a bit of a big order since it was known as McCain-Kennedy and was widely understood by conservatives to be tantamount to amnesty.

National security conservatives will have to agree to set aside the fact that McCaiin's grandstanding on the issue of the treatment of unlawful combatants in September 2006 derailed the entire GOP's endgame agenda heading into the elections. The Senate leadership and the White House had agreed on a careful series of legislative propositions on the Gitmo detainees and on surveillance protocols for use when watching terrorists abroad communicating with their allies inside the U.S., an agenda which also included some crucial judicial nominations like the still stalled one of Peter Keisler to the D.C. Circuit of Appeals, an agenda which would have done much to recapture the sense of momentum the upper chamber and the GOP as a whole had lost and which would have focused the public on the war and the role of intelligence gathering in it. Senators McCain and Graham smashed up the entire plan and the Senate majority was erased a few weeks later.

And all conservatives will have to set aside their deep, deep anger over John McCain's Gang of 14 coup that ended the hopes of restoring decency, order and constitutional process to the judicial confirmation process.

Recall what had happened: Serial filibusters were staged by Dems against many Bush nominees throughout 2003 and 2004. The GOP and the president campaigned on the issue of the judges throughout the elections of 2004, and won a 55 seat Senate majority in part on the strength of the outrage on the issue. Majority Leader Frist set about organizing a strategy --the Constitutional Option or Nuclear Option-- which anticipated that a ruling would be requested from the Senate Chair --the Vice President-- on whether or not a filibuster could be used against a judicial nominee. At least 50 of the GOP's 55 senators were pledged to support the chair. A crucial and long-lasting victory would have been won and a principle established.

Days before the vote and the end of the filibusters, John McCain engineered a deal with six other Republicans and seven Democrats which threw some fine nominees under the bus in exchange for a temporary abandonment by Democrats of filibusters against some Bush nominees. The shock and outrage at McCain among conservatives at this awful deal was of a intensity that has rarely been matched. John McCain in effect undid the vote of 2004, compromised away an issue he had not been asked to lead on and on which millions of Republican voters had voted and for which they had contributed. Millions of Republicans care deeply about judges. John McCain did not. He could not allow Majority Leader Frist his victory, but in sabotaging Frist, he sunk his own candidacy. The one issue on which all three core GOP constituencies agree is the importance of originalists on the bench. It was obvious amid the wreckage brought about by the Gang of 14 that John McCain didn't care about the courts. He cared about John McCain.

The neuralyzer will have to be set to be careful not to obscure the memory of John McCain's heroic service and painful sacrifices during his long imprisonment, and it will have to leave the memory of Senator McCain's steadfast support for victory in the war. He is truly a great American.

But he is a lousy senator when it comes to legislation and priorities, and a terrible Republican when it comes to the party's agenda.

The independents and the newspapers of New Hampshire love the idea of a McCain candidacy. Some are giving a last salute to McCain for his wartime heroism. Others are expressly attempting to stop Mitt Romney's momentum for the reason that the same newspaper tried to stop Ronald Reagan in 1980 --Romney has the best chance in November.

But it is the Republican nomination McCain is seeking, not the applause of the MSM and independents. A Republican nomination he won't be getting.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Hugh Hewitt is host of a nationally syndicated radio talk show. Hugh Hewitt's new book is The War On The West.

Be the first to read Hugh Hewitt's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Oh, it's him... again
Yet another 1 star rating for Hugh.

Does anyone care what this guy thinks anymore?

Didn't think so.

Do You Even Try to Be Objective
Hugh you are a joke. Nobody takes you seriously any more. Romney won't win the nomination. He Flip Flops on too many issues for any Republican to believe him, that is unless you are willing to have your vote bought buy him. You used to be someone who mattered but ever since your wrote a book on Romney you've just become another paid mouthpiece.


Young voters need no neuralizer
Yeah, I remember all these except I did not remember the vote against the Federal Marriage Amendment and that is kind of a deal breaker for me.

But, young voters have no idea what kind of history McCain has, what his legacy is. McCain prefers I'm sure to leave the young set in blissful ignorance. Thanks Hugh for laying it all out.

Hugh = Embarassment to the GOP
I gave this horrible column 1 star, and the only reason I did so was because 0 stars was not an option.

First, let me state that from now on, Hugh Hewitt should be required to disclose in every column he writes that he is a supporter of the Romney campaign. Just as Rich Lowry had to disclose his publication's endorsement of Romney on Hannity & Colmes tonight before commenting on the election, Hewitt too should be required to do so, so the reader harbors no illusions about Baghdad Hugh's intentions.

Secondly, this kind of column coming from a Mitt Romney supporter is just absolutely and deliciously hysterical. MCCAIN will need a neuralizer to erase people's memory? Uh, if that's the case, then so will Romney, who, up until a very short time ago, supported ABORTION, tax hikes, gay marriage, gun control, the very same McCain-Feingold bill that Hewitt disparages, universal health care, etc. etc.

McCain is a true conservative hero who was fighting the good fight for conservative values back when Romney was still arguing passionately in favor of abortion and gay marriage.

Give me a break Hewitt, you hack. No one is fooled by your nonsense. You are a lousy commentator, and an embarassment to conservatives everywhere.

And by the way -- how does Mitt stand the best chance in November? Look at the polls - Mitt gets CRUSHED by Hillary in every single poll, whereas John McCain WINS against Hillary in every single poll. Look at the DailyKos today - they are admitting that they are terrified of McCain, and are absolutely giddy over the prospect of Mitt Romney, who they consider to be their "dream candidate."

PS - In the interest of full disclosure, I am a McCain supporter.

HUCKABEE WINS NOMINATION & PRESIDENCY!!!
You are right that Hugh is an Embarrassment to the GOP. I like McCain and Huckabee but for the time being ...

The Shift in Momentum IS FOR PRESIDENT HUCKABEE in 2008

Mike Huckabee is presidential material and is alone able to defeat Hillary & Obama. I am now convinced that those wealthier donors to Romney's, Giuliani's, and Thompson's campaign have wasted their money and if they continue, are wasting their hard earned money on candidates who do not have voter appeal or substance. As a member of the younger generation, I will tell you point blank, Romney, Giuliani, and Thompson DO NOT connect with us.

ROMENY has run out of gas. He has been the worst investment money could buy. His persecution complex makes him so defensive, weepy and wimpy that he cracks under pressure. His fake, calculated tears make him look like a BIG weaning before now Czar Putin in mother Russia and rest of the world. Romneys negative campaigning reveals his unprofessional desperation and that he is really an unkind angry old man. BOTH Romney's and Giuliani's flip flop past makes them a liability and not an asset for republicans in 2008.

Every time Huckabee is heard his approval amongst Republicans and Democrats increases even WITHOUT major financial support. Just imagine what would happen if he got the major financial support. He is the Republican's secret weapon in the 2008 election. Huckabee's proven leadership can help bring America together as a team.

Huckabee is the BEST candidate because he not only attracts republicans but also democrats to his side without compromising his principles. Both side support is needed to win this election in 2008 and he has it.

WHY HUCKABEE WINS THE NOMINATION and the PRESIDENCY

http://evolutionfacts.townhall.com


Translation - Romney on Ropes in NH
You are such a Romney shill. Do you think you are fooling anyone? If Jesus Christ himself showed up in the poles ahead of Romney we would surely see you arguing that Jesus himself had no hope of coming back that his campaign was dead with no hope of resurrecting it.

4 stars & a heart
Great article by Hugh Hewitt.

McGang-of-14 attempting to get the GOP nomination and the Presidency, when so many Supreme Court appointments are coming up, is totally beyond belief! Totally stunning in-your-face kiss-my-chutzpa!

Had to take off one star for the two times he slips Mr. Plastic Morphin Fantastic into the article.

Thompson o8

Thanks for the Reminder, Hugh
Great article Hugh, thanks for reminding us what a joke John McCain has been to the GOP. Thanks for line-iteming every reason why McCain is not what we need as the Republican nominee.

- Against Bush Tax cuts
- McCain Feingold
- Gang of 14 Arrogance - holding Bush nominees hostage
- Amnesty for illegals

McCain is old, cranky and bitter and needs to go away. And one more thing. You know he shouldn't be the one when he is the soundbite the MSM uses to discredit anything this current administration has done. His friends, Graham, Hagel are just the kinds of Republicans the Dems and the MSM want running against Hillary/Obama in 2008. McCain just wants to be liked--and on TV.

Lets elect someone who actually has a chance to get elected: Romney.

Funny How The Truth Falls On Deaf Ears
You did it a gain Hugh, you told them the truth and they did not want to hear it.

I am happy for me, but sad for them for allowing their impossible dream to blind then to the reality. We need a mature adult in washington.
Mitt Romney is it.

A very timely and appropriate message. 12 stars to make up for the missing stars.

Well stated Mr. Hewitt
We see the bitter respond.

Seems the truth is painful to a few...

One can only hope the fine Mr. Romney gets the votes...

It is clear, Liberal Democrats fear his fine potential.


Great points again...
Hugh is absolutely right and you all either aren't true conservatives whether you vote for Huckabee, Giuliani, Romney, Thompson, etc. These votes were the times I was the most furious with the GOP and you look at the common thread through all of them and it is McCain (I'm from AZ). We all should remember all the times he derailed our momentum in Congress.
What has hurt the GOP this year is having too many choices up to the primaries. I am NOT for changing the process but in previous elections we have not had sooooo many choices FOR THIS LENGTH OF TIME. I think it has hurt us as a party because we haven't been able to circle the wagons around say 3-4 candidates. Your thoughts??

Thank you eli
for succinctly summarizing HH's column. It allows me to succinctly respond to it.
McCain was;

Against Bush tax cut. But he was and always has been against wasteful govmnt spending. This is the more important position on economic matters because once the line is held on spending there is no difficulty at all in cutting taxes.

author of McCain Feingold. But this is ancient history and has little discernible relevance to presidential governance.

Leader of gang of 14. There were 3 options. So called nuclear, work with the Dems, or do nothing. Maybe the nuclear option would have worked but it would have been a risk. Those who insist on forcing their will on the unwilling are offended at McCain's willingness to work with the Dems as he has been time and time again, but if he becomes president he will have credibility when he asks the Dems to work with him.

For amnesty for illegals. And so is everybody else. You see when there is no effective immigration policy in place then illegals will continue to enter the country and get themselves established here and they will get away with it. Those who oppose the only bill that has a chance of being passed are in favor of the status quo, and, effectively, amnesty.

M_From_Idaho
Your statements make little sense to me. McCain/Feingold is extremely relevant. It illustrates total contempt for the constitution, for voters and their ability to select their representatives, and shows a man who will resort to chicanery to maintain his postion of power. This level of arrogance can never again be trusted.
And everybody else is for amnesty for illegals????? Not on my block. Infuriatingly so in the halls of Congress and that is why we must throw the rascals out. McCain is as good a start as any.

M from Idaho
Ummmm.....Don't remember that 78% of the country is AGAINST Amnesty!! That is why the halls of congress started shutting off their phones because both DEMS and REPUBS were calling their offices!! Like I said in another post, I'm from AZ and we were all upset at both Kyl and McCain with their votes!! As a sidebar, where was Huckabee on this issue? Oh yeah, he wanted to allow illegals tuition to Arkansas schools...awwww so nice of him. But my daughter that may think about going to school there from AZ has to pay out-of-state tuition!!!??
McCain and Huckabee are NOT the answers when it comes to immigration which is NATIONAL problem not a DEM or REPUB issue!

I'm not a McCain fan...
But I can at least respect the guy. I've lost all respect for Hugh and (by association) Romney. The Huckaboom thunders on - have you seen the latest out of Oklahoma?

Huckabee 29%; McCain 17%; Giuliani 11%; and are you listening??
Romney 9%

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Blogs.View&Blog_id= 967

A nightmare ticket but right for...
each other would be Huckabee and McCain! Can you imagine the GOP right leaving in droves with that ticket?? Talk about Immigration having the doors thrown wide open for them! There are approx over 5000 illegals coming across AZ borders daily! I'm sure America wants all these people because as Christians we need to be open minded(right). My Bible says to obey Caesars laws and to teach people how to fish not give them a fish. Coulter/Malkin/Rush/Hugh/National Review are all correct in their assessment of these two.
GO MITT!!!
GO NAVY!!!

Savage99
McCain Feingold does not show total contempt for the Constitution, or voters. At least not from McCains perspective. His purpose in authoring the legislation was to reduce the influence of money in politics and give more power to the voter. That it does that is certainly arguable, but it does not show the contempt that you have said.
I am unaware of any chicanery that was used to pass McCain Feingold. Nor of any arrogance (at least beyond that which is typical in national politicians) on McCain's part.

Yes you are for amnesty if you do not support doing something about it NOW! Timeliness is the most important consideration because every day that goes by without an effective policy is another group of illegals who will get here permanently regardless of what policy is enacted later. If you shoot down the only bill that can be passed because it offers what you call amnesty for those who are here, well I've got news for you. Those who are already here will for the most part stay here, and they will not be punished for it.

M_From_Idaho
McCain's position as part of Mccain/Feingold is untenable. The congressmen who voted for it stated the intention was to limit the influence of money. The actual effect, as noted and predicted within 24 hours, was restriction of free speech concerning elections. If McCain could not see its impact, he is a fool. If he and the other men who voted for it knew quite well it would be another self-serving device to make it more difficult to replace an incumbent, they were guilty of chicanery. I did not say chicanery was used to pass the bill, but that the provisions of the bill itself were exactly that.
Strict enforcement of the existing laws would soon correct the illegal alien mess. While enforced they worked for hundreds of years.
Having repeated my viewpoints, without hope of altering yours, I wish you a pleasant holiday season and a happy prosperous New Year.

Mccain and Huck's supporters
Interesting to read the opening of professor X's post which confirms my general impression. Huckabee supporters like Mccain alot. According to Brownback (the uncontested pro-life leader in the Senate), Mccain was instrumental in getting Roberts and Alito confirmed on the Supreme Court. Brownback of course has endorsed Mccain, supported Huckabee, and made it clear that he cannot support Romney. If Huckabee were to fold early, his supporters would go with McCain (and the combination of an endorsement from Brownback and Huckabee would guarantee a McCain victory in south Carolina).






Sally
Interesting viewpoints. It would seem that with the fragmented GOP candidate field, just who gets the support of candidate dropouts will determine the winning candidate.

Sheeeesh
Where has my conservative party gone to if we are looking at McCain and or Huckabee??
I'm going with Mitt. Fred was the "supposed horse" to beat but he never got out of the gate and has had staffing issues, like McCain, and has never gotten anywhere. I think Mitt has run a great campaign and is battle tested to take on HRC or Obama. He has been gaining staff and endorsements from those in Congress and from the private sector. I am not surprised at all that a newspaper hasn't backed him nor do I care. Another example of my party leaving me, since when did we care about a paper from the MSM endorsing our candidates??
Personal opinion only, I think that Rush will back Mitt from the hints he has given on his program. That endorsement will carry weight with me because he is the face and the founder of all these talk radio and blogs over the years of conservatism.
Is Mitt perfect? NO. Not even. Is he the BEST candidate that is well rounded in all areas I agree with? YES.
GO MITT!!!
GO NAVY!!!

Savage99
Don't think my viewpoints are unalterable. I do occasionally change my mind. In any case, I have not so much been expressing my viewpoint as I have been trying to express some things that I think need to be considered.

If it was obvious that McCain Feingold was a self serving incumbent protection device why did it take years for it to pass? My recollection is that he only got it passed after he made it the centerpiece of his campaign and then got into a position of power in the Senate and held hostage a vote on the tax cuts. BTW Bush signed the bill.

Yes strict enforcement of immigration laws would help but one is justified in being skeptical that it would correct the problem considering the magnitude of the problem.

Best to you and yours at this time of the year.

Immigration laws
I'm not sure that immigration laws have ever been enforced in the U.S. Migrant farm labor has had a substantial illegal immigrant component for as long as I can remember.

Well, gotta go.

Romney followers...
...seeming a little DESPERATE, dontcha think? Not playing it cool at all.

Romney's calculating style which is obvious guys, wake up, is as bad as the Clintons. McCain's honesty eviscerates her phonyness. Romney makes it OK.

Romney is weak on the war, floppy on positions. Romney is a phony. Varmints. Please.

McCain was wrong on immigration, but he heard our cries and he will close the border first. McCain has been precisely right on the war, despite left wing hysteria that could have seriously derailed the future. McCain never went wobbly. Romney has been a breeze-followers, because that's what he is.

Nobody likes Romney. Nobody really likes him very much. Face it. Even Hillary could beat him.

McCain. McCain... pro-life, genuine honest war hero, right on the war. McCain.

Against Romney, independents vote for HRC, or Obama, or Edwards, and Romney LOSES.

Neuralyzer?
Please. That's just silly.

Classless "hit piece".
First of all, there is SOME merit to Hewitt's criticisms.

I disagree with McCain on Campaign Finance Reform, his initial position on the border(which he has since revised), his position that "waterboarding' is torture(I don't believe it is, and even if it is torture, there are times it may be necessary), and to some extent his involvement with the "Gang of 14" irritated me.

I could not care less about his position of marriage amendment or abortion.

However, given that Bush, when presented with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to have an impact on the USSC, presented the nation with the breathtakingly brilliant selection of Harriet Miers, I think Hewitt's crass condemnation of McCain for his intrigues with the Gang of 14 rings a bit hollow. Bush gets a pass for initially displaying a stupendous lack of judgment. McCain doesn't.

Hewitt probably is a shill for Romney, which is fine. I just wish he had the same intestinal fortitude to critique Romney, as he does McCain.

I have not yet made up my mind on whom to support for the GOP nomination. At this point, I am leaning toward McCain. Hewitt's article went over territory I already knew. It opened no new doors.

I like McCain because he is experienced on foreign affairs, which after the incompetence of eight years of Bush presidency, will be a welcome relief.

I also admire McCain because he is a patriot, who paid his dues, unlike a certain smooth-talking, saccharin businessman, or former U.S. attorney replete with skeletons in his closet, or a leftist evangelical minister whose social gospel calls for Americans to spend themselves into the poorhouse to cure the ills of world poverty.

Ron Paul is my sentimental favorite, but the big money corporate interests, neocon interventionists, and open-borders crowd, who control the GOP will never permit Ron Paul to get the nomination.


McCain = Zero
Hewitt you get credit for most of your article but your failure to hit him harder on illegals. You also get a minus for saying that McTreason is a war hero.
Remember, water boarding gets answers. Of all, he is the worst Republican candidate. With his record, he might be among the tops if he were running for the Demo nomination. And a personal attack - McTreason drives me crazy with his monotonous droning talk, just like the Dimwit Harry Reid. From under which rock do these "leaders" come?

Hugh does a great service by reminding
people of the McShame acts in the past few short years. Along with all of that bad he only has one good and that is the position to be against "cut and run" of the Lamocrats. That is areal weak platform because ALL of the Repub candidates but RP are against cut and run. There is no crying reason to vote for McShame unless you are a liberal looking for a vote that is not an embarrament on foreign policy and there are a lot better for that.

Funny how every word is true...
All the Hugh and Mitt haters come in here and claim how this is a "classless hit piece on McCain".

Um, exactly which statements are not TRUE? Now if the TRUTH seems like a hit piece on McCain, maybe the problme is that McCain is a scmreaming RINO and has no place as the republican Nominee.

I can see it now, 2008, the McCain / Olympia Snowe Ticket.

Their slogan will be, "2008, The Year of the RINO".

John McCain New Ad
Will this help John McCain in NH?

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/john-mccain-new-ad


Boomshak
I thought I made it abundantly clear that Hewitt's criticisms had some justification.

My point, especially now in light of the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan, is we need a strong, rational, non-ideological position on foreign affairs.

I never believed Bush was up to the task on foreign affairs. And given the last eight years, I don't believe that assessment is invalid.

What qualifications do the others possess? A saccharine, smooth-talking, glib businessman who changes positions like a chameleon changes color, a U.S. attorney with a host of skeletons in his closet that has no foeign policy experience, an evangelical Christian who has a leftist social gospel that harkens back to the naivete of Jimmy Carter?

McCain has been in the senate for decades and has had to familiarize himself with foreign policy issues.

I am fully aware he has faults. But, given the increasingly dangerous world in which we live, we need someone who has experience.


Hey Dan!
In the interest of full disclosure, I am a NOT McCain supporter. While I appreciate and recognize his war record, he has sold his soul to the D.C. process. Working with the liberal Dems to give the appearance of bipartisanship while forgetting the goal is not conducive to conservative success.

These McCain sellouts that Hugh summarized have done grevious harm to the GOP and the country. John McCain does not deserve our support in his bid for the presidency.

Mitt's press secretary strikes again
Isn't Humittth wonderful? Will the next column being on how Mitt walked on water before the winter olympics or eliminated the national debt with a spoken word. Seriously, Hugh, take a pill and start to figure out that you need to prepare for life after Mitt.

g2825m:
Double-down on what you said to Idaho--he must be breathing thin air at high altitude.

Everyone should know that McCain is not popular in AZ. The only reason he gets re-elected is because no one can overcome his machine.

Just for the record: illegals are bailing out of AZ like crazy in anticipation of the new employer verification law coming on-line on Jan. 1, thus supporting my contention during the amnesty debate: you don't have to round them and deport them; give them incentive to leave and they will.

Go Navy? Were you on a submarine or a target?

No McCain Ever
Enough said.

Old and Bitter
I agree with whoever said he is old and bitter and should go away.

McCain has so much baggage, but the worst is amnesty for illegal aliens who have broken into our country.

A vote for McCain is a vote to turn the US into a third world country.

I wondered how long
it would take for the insane Bush haters to come on and blame the assination of Bhutto on Bush. I knew that it wouldn't be too long. It only takes a few seconds to spit out the dirt and foam and start spewing insanity before they start gnawinf the ground again.

Better a dim Dem
than a RINO and national back stabber like McShame.

No vote for this joker from me EVER!
And if that means Hitlery gets the office...I don't care becuase the Rs will fight her more stridently than they would this turn-coat.

Worst possible (R) ticket...
McCain/Voinovich

submarine or a target?
HA HA HA HA HA! OHHHH THAT'S HEAVY!C'MON FOLKS..
LETS SHOW A LITTLE RESPECT FOR-- !@#$%%^&^&&*&^%$#@! MC CAIN!WAR HERO-YES!SENATOR.!@##$%^^*&^^
MAYBE HE CAN BE SPOKESMAN FOR ROMNEY IF HE GETS ELECTED..AFTER ALL ROMNEY WHEN ANGERED SAYS--GOSH!
NOW IN THAT DEPT. mc mexico can do much better!!
MAYBE WE CAN CREATE A NEW DEPT.- sec/of profanity
...john mc mexico would beat them all hands down!
he said..he thinks of being elected prez everytime he showers...hmmm??!any comments to that???
elvis

Romney' chances in November
Hugh: I have no problem with your support for Romney. I like him too. But to say he has the best chance to win in November is wrong. Every pols shows he gets beaten badly by every major Democratic nominee. That is not the case in head to head polls with McCain or Giuliani, who have greater appeal to independents and Reagan Democrats. Richard Baehr American Thinker.

national polls
mean nothing now!
nothing now!
elvis

Keating Five
Hugh,
My memory is perhaps a little longer than yours but McCain was implicated in the Keating Five Scandal, which if not an outright quid pro quo for campaign dough certainly had the appearance of it. Since that time I've never, ever trusted John McCain.
I freely acknowledge that he is a war hero and for that he has my admiration and respect. However that isn't a qualification for president.
The deal breaker for me was McCain-Feingold, which showed chutzpah after the Keeting Five incident. More importantly however, this demonstrated that his instincts are not conservative. Money is speech as ruled (correctly for once by the SCOTUS) and therefore such use should be as free as possible. The McCain-Fiengold legislation regulated free speech by regulating case and, as happens with such government involvement, distorted the marketplace of ideas. A true conservative understands that sunshine, not government regulation, is the campaign finance reform needed.

This is the way it plays out.
I think the nation is anxious for a change, and that does not bode well for the GOP to retain the whitehouse this November. Also, the fact so many GOP incumbent senators and congressmen are electing not to seek another term means they have concluded the congress will likely remain in democrat hands, and they will be consigned to minority status.

I realize this is not good news for the GOP flock.

My only point in bringing it up is to make the argument the only way a GOP can win in November is with an infusiion of independent and moderate votes, and McCain, for all his shortcomings, has the best chance of accomplishing that.

Those are the facts of life...to this point, anyway. A huge terror attack here in the U.S. between now and election day would possibly change that dynamic.

Let me use the Evang. 'logic'
I can never vote for a Southern Baptist.
Jimmy Carter was SBC. Failure.
Clinton was SBC. Failure.
I don't understand the SBC 'theology', and why they had segerated congerations until the late 80's.
I can't vote for Huckabee, because he's SBC.

by the way, he knows a whole lot about the LDS faith. why? Because 1. he's a SBC 'pastor', 2. because he was a keynote speaker at a anti-mormon convention by the SBC in Salt Lake City in 98. So, not only can I never vote for a memeber of the Southern Baptist sect, but I cannot vote for liar either.

Thanks for a good reminder, Hugh!
I haven't liked McCain for a long time but I was getting fuzzy on WHY I didn't like him. You did all of us a favor, Hugh, in reminding us of the considerable damage that McCain has done to the conservative agenda. I remember when I heard, at the time they were being foisted on the American people, that each one of his shenanigans (listed so succinctly here in your article) I remembered again how upset I was at McCain's part in all of this. Thank you for your very fine article!

had enough of evangelical presidents
Huckabee is having to contend with the legacy of previous Christian evangelical presidents, namely Jimmy Carter and G.W. Bush.(both of whom were southern governors, as is Huckabee).

I am not anti-Christian, but I want public policy divorced from religious fervor.

Most people on this board despise the evangelical streak of Carter due to its naivete, but fail to condemn Bush's evangelical streak which helped to bring about such disasters as Iraq.

I don't want evangelical thinking affecting government, period.

The difference...
HH and Romney supporters use facts, data, and specifics to make their points

McCain and Huckabee supporters use personal attacks, insults, and invective

I guess if I didn't have any facts to support my candidates, I'd use those things too...

Check this out...looks like McCain had some good things to say about Mitt at one point...did McCain flip flop? Was he lying then or is he lying now?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=QA7JTDjG-Po

Sowing Discord
Qweenmumof7 writes:
Thursday, December, 27, 2007 10:44
Let me use the Evang. 'logic'
---
A Spicy Admonition:

I want you to take this personally. Who do you think you are? You are acting like a liberal-statist trying to smear the LDS Church. You should read Matthew Ch. 5 on the beatitudes. When you behavior matches that then I might believe you might be LDS. Other wise you are foolishly sowing discord.

Stupid, Senseless Attack By Hewitt
With "friends" like Hugh Hewitt, Republicans do not need enemies. Hewitt is doing very well in cutting up an outstanding Republican in John McCain, the son and grandson of U.S. Navy Admirals and a naval aviator who is a genune war hero, so as to help elect an anti-military socialist in Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama who will nominate left wing judges to the federal bench.

First of all, lets deal with some positives on John McCain that Hewitt ignores. No one is more qualified to be Commander in Chief than McCain. He showed his knowledge about military matters with his critique of our prior efforts in Iraq, and he showed his character in standing by our troops earlier in 2007 when other Republicns were hedging their bets. Shockingly, Hewitt says not a word about conducting the war with the radical jihadists and can't when engaged in his own ill conceived jihad against McCain. John McCain is also a pro-life fiscal conservative who has committed to nominating strict constructionist judges and to honesty in Government.

Now, lets deal with Hewitt's "points." On taxes, McCain sought spending cuts to go along with the original tax cuts; he is as strong as anyone running on keeping the tax cuts; and no one is as strong as he is on cutting wasteful spending. On the "Gang of 14," what McCain did was to broker a compromise to enable Roberts and Alito to be appointed to the US Supreme Court and some conservatives to the US Courts of Appeals while preserving the filibuster for when there would be a Democratic Congress (like now); no one knows that the so-called "constitutional option" would have worked and it is Schumer who feels snookered. On immigration, McCain has been saying for months that he got the message, that law enforcement comes first. On the 2006 election, to blame McCain for it is both hooey and disgusting -- McCain campaignbed hard for Republicans that year.

To Hewitt
This is a personal note to you, Hewitt.

My older son is a U.S. Army First Lieutenant(with Ranger tab) who last October finished a 15-month tour of duty in Iraq as an infantry platoon leader, earning a Bronze Star and an Army Commendation Medal for valor for actions under fire. I know what a fantastic job our military guys have been doing. I also remember 2006 and 2007 well when Democrats were announcing and working for defeat and Republicans were hedging their bets. Not McCain. He had been calling for the change in strategy that was in fact implemented under General Petraeus, and McCain stood in steadfast support of the troops and their mission. McCain showed character in doing so, and he displayed his knowledge of military and nationla security matters.

My younger son will be commissioned a Second Lieutenant in the US Marines in May 2008 upon collge graduation having already passed officer training at Quantico. So with my older son continuing his Army service and my younger son a Marine, the issue of who will be our next Commander in Chief is of vital concern. John McCain is clearly heads above everyone else in his readiness to take on that role.

In my view, Hewitt, you are way off the mark and you are only going to help elect a Democrat who will be unfit to be Commander in Chief.

McCain Website: Why McCain?
All should go to John McCain's web site and go to the page "Why McCain?" Read it. If you are a conservative, you will agree with every word of it. You will also see that John McCain is a big person and that Hugh Hewitt is a very small person.

McCain would bring a Democrat WIN!
Electing McCain as our candidate would GUARANTEE a Democrat victory!
McCain is such a RINO that he almost ran on the Democrat ticket in 2004.
http://www.bullwinkleblog.com/?p=3925

And Democrats still want revenge for that Swift Boat thing with Kerry.
If we know about this, you can be sure the Dems do too;
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/mccain.html

To elko.mike
John McCain was not found to have done anything wrong in connection with what is called the Keating Five. If you think differently, then say precisely what you think McCain did. I bet you can't.

Ironically, it was the experience with the Keating Five affair that pushed John McCain to campaign finance reform in an effort to reduce the influence of money on politics. In any event, McCain-Feingold is in the hands of the US Supreme Court. The problem with the law is not the intentions, but in the unworkable distinctions that are inherent in the statutory scheme.

Generational Military Professionals...

...are rarely conservatives. In fact, their family's prosperity and influential connections are the result of big government. The majority of admirals and generals are essentially Democrats. A paradox lost on the left and ignored on the right. To expect an admirals son to be a "real" conservative is to believe that snow angels can become real angels. The warm spring Sun will prove otherwise.

@ David
I'm sorry, but I can't let the following comment go:
"The difference .... HH and Romney supporters use facts, data, and specifics to make their points. McCain and Huckabee supporters use personal attacks, insults, and invective ..."
-----

I'm sorry, but this couldn't be further from the truth. I dare you to name me ONE time when Hugh Hewitt has used a single fact to support any of his arguments.

The problem that I and many others have with Hewitt is that his opinions often fly right in the face of the facts!!

For instance, Hugh repeatedly asserts that Romney would be the strongest general election candidate. He provides NO facts or statistics to back that up - he opts to rely on pure emotion and blind, unconditional love for Romney.

He completely IGNORES the HUNDREDS of polls that have shown Romney being absolutely destroyed and annihilated by both Clinton and Obama. He completely IGNORES the HUNDREDS of polls that show John McCain DEFEATING Clinton and Obama.

Like Dinesh D'Souza says, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.

To MyOpine
What universe are you operating in? Since when would electing a pro-life fiscal conservative with a distinguished war record and with a fount of knowledge about military and foreign affairs be a Democrat win?

Take my challenge of going to the John McCain web site and reading the page "Why McCain?"

To Dan
I agree with your 12:25 PM correction of David.

MCCAIN
My major problem with John McCain is the utter contempt he shows toward the voters and the Constitution as exemplified by the McCain Feingold Incumbent Protection Act. McConnell vs. FEC will go down in history as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions ever. It is right up there with Dred Scott, Plessy and Roe. The only difference is that in Dred Scott, Plessy and Roe the Stupremes only told selected groups that their Constitutional Rights didn't matter. In upholding McCain Feingold, they told everyone our rights don't matter. McCain was the author of that abominable piece of legislation. That makes him unfit for any office.

McCain cannot be trusted!
Can you conceive of a McCain presidency worse than a Hillary presidency or even the Obama Muslim twist? How far down must America go before it reaches its bottom and begins to recover from the socialists and Communists trying to take over with their candidates and policies? We are at the crossroad of collapsing into the pit of ignorance from the school system, judicial system having been sabotaged for years and too many refugees climbing the fences into America.

1st Mafia Question:Where ya been?
Where ye been McCain? Well after being present at a number of incredible military disasters that would make Inspector Clouseau or Mr. McGoo proud, he spent 4 years as a guest of our sworn enemies in Vietnam.

Without those four years John McCain is just another John McDoe or John McSmith.Because of his "heroic past", he has the allegiance of veterans who do not question anything he does. This is his core group. Because of his past he has to support the war in Iraq or lose his core group. But what do we know about his time in prison? Nothing.

Where is the debriefing on those years? Where is the corroboration? Where are the Swift Boaters demanding he sign off on his military records? We need our heroes. And Uncle Ho together with the U.S. Commander of the Vietnam War conspired to make McCain a heroe. His Daddy was John S. McCain, Jr.,CINCPAC, Commander in Chief Pacific, during the Vietnam War.

The one clear truth about his stay in Vietnam is that he was horribly injured in the bungled parachute jump. Those injuries are verifiable with Xrays etc. With those injuries he could not have survived without excellent medical care,freedom from torture and good nutrition. One thing we do know is that he was in solitary confinement for most of his stay. So there is absolutely no corroboration for most of the stories he told. Most of the inhabitants of the "Hanoi Hilton" are dead. So how is it that McCain is still in great shape and working so effectively to undermine our Constitution and to destroy the Republican Party?

Phil Byler
You did not go to the links I provided and you expect me to go to McCain's site to read his propaganda?

McCains war record contains more fiction than Kerry's!
Do you have any idea of the spin Democrats would put on THIS?
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/mccain.html

If we nominate McCain is is the same as giving the election to Democrats.

McCain is Finished
McCain's fatal flaw is hubris. He stayed too long in the machine that is DC, and it corrupted him beyond recognition.

If you don't think so, look at his home state and the immigration issue. The governor of Arizona has had to declare a State of Emergency, yet McCain wants amnesty for the invaders of his District. Talk about a travesty!

The rest of the issues Hugh raises are all fair game and icing on the cake.

It's really so sad, since as a young man McCain was a hero who sacrificed so much. But as a politician, he became what beheld.

You are all witnessing the Twilight of McCain.

Byler: McCain Censured
Phil Byler writes:
"John McCain was not found to have done anything wrong in connection with what is called the Keating Five. If you think differently, then say precisely what you think McCain did. I bet you can't."

--------------------------------------


Charles Keating, who ran Lincoln Savings and Loan, was a frequent and large donor to McCain's campaigns. Lincoln Savings and Loan was subject to a number of investigations and eventually failed costing investors hundreds of millions of dollars. Before it failed five senators, including McCain, intervened with bank regulators in the matter. McCain himself has said it was a poor decision on his part. The question of quid pro quo comes up because of Keating's campaign donations and McCain intervention with regulators on Keating's behalf. McCain was issued a rebuke by the Senate for an ethical lapse and from that I conclude he did something wrong.
see http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE4DA113 AF936A3575BC0A967958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

I still assert that McCain-Feingold was bad legislation and its underpinnings are not conservative. Hence that's a deal breaker for me.

McCain Has Been Bribed
McCain has lied about accepting favors from immigration special interest groups. A bribe may be power, votes or money and McCain has accepted all three for years to promote illegal alien acceptance. He calls it political contributions but Americans know it for what it is....a bribe.

McCain states that we need compassion for the 20 million, mostly illiterate, aliens who have snuck into our country. Included among them are tens of thousands of theives, dope dealers, anarchists, smugglers, rapists, murderers, cop killers and child molesters. Illegal aliens murder 2,000 inocent Americans yearly and McCain has enticed those killers to come here to slaughter us.

McCain slithered into a middle of the night secret meeting with 9 other sneaky Senators and gave birth to the Kennedy-McCain Amnesty Bill that would have given citizenship to millions of illegals at the cost of 2 trillion dollars to U.S. taxpayers. We already pay $20,000...the equivalent of a new car... per year to each illegal family and McCain would have multiplied that by millions when he shoved it down our throats.

Visualize the Senate of ancient Rome just before the collapse of the empire. They lounged in their togas while slaves (pages) fanned them and fed them peeled grapes. Little has changed except the grapes have been replaced with tacos. Ancient war hero McCain lounges in comfort except his ancient head now shows signs of advanced stages of dry-rot and he farts taco dust.

If McCain is elected he'll sleep and lounge all day while illegals swarm and we build mud huts to live in. He'll need his sleep because each night he'll appear at someone's home (your's is next), steal your car and give it to an illegal alien family.

Anyone who even considers voting for this lump of coal is either also a lump or a member of an illegal alien special interest group.

Robert, Robert;
Tell us again about your military experience.
As a Navy Captain who flys combat but does not know ordinance codes and therefore does not know what weapons he is armed with.

They fixed the toy airplane in front of Wal*Mart.
You can go play now.

Romney's high negatives
Hugh wrote: Romney has the best chance in November.

Rasmussen Reports tells us today that, "Nationally, Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney have the highest level of core opposition among the leading Presidential candidates--47% are poised to vote against each of them."

Mitt's many flip flops and seemingly less than honest statements have made him the candidate Republican voters least trust to be honest with them. Add to that the fact that many Christians are very opposed to his religion and have said they will never vote for a Mormon and you get a candidate who cannot win the Republican nomination. And if by some miracle he did he would certainly lose in the general election.

Stay Home If you must
Others have argued McCain's case here with sufficient eloquence that I need not elaborate. I will simply say that I, like jerabaub, have not made a final decision but am leaning toward him.

I just hope that if McCain is the nominee those who cannot bring themselves to vote for him will stay home rather than vote for Ron Paul or any other 3rd party candidate.

I actually voted for Perot as a "protest vote" in '92 believing that, since I lived in TX, it wouldn't affect the ultimate outcome anyway.

Now I am not so sure. I have come to believe that votes for Perot threw the '92 election to Bill Clinton. Possibly it was also the Nader candidacy that gave us GWB.

I am more conservative at 44 than I was at 28, but try also to be a realist. I think it is far better to hold your nose and vote Republican than it is to stay home. But even failing to vote is preferable to siphoning off votes from the GOP because the nominee that rises out of the Primary votes OF THE PEOPLE does not pass every jot and tittle of your personal, exacting litmus tests. The Democrat will always be far worse and as for the Republicans fighting harder against a Hillary (or whomever) in office, that is hardly a rationale for selecting the Commander in Chief of the Leader of the Free World at such a time as this!!


Hugh, McCaine's Record is unforgettable
when will you write a similar piece about Romney's record on HIS MULTIPLE POSITIONS OF POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY ON ALL SOCIAL ISSUES? As long as McCaine can defeat Romney in NH or at least make his win look minimal by decreasing the margin - McCain will have served the republic well.

To Dan and Phil
Facts:

1. McCain was the sponsor and architect of McCain Feingold
2. McCain did vote against the Bush tax cuts
3. McCain did vote against a Federal Marriage Amendment
4. McCain did engineer the "Gang of 14" which lost us some great judicial nominees (we would have gotten Alito and Roberts anyway)
5. McCain is against certain interrogation techniques that he calls "torture" (people can disagree, but that he's opposed this is a fact)
6. McCain was the sponsor and architect of the illegal immigration amnesty bill

Are any of these not factual?

What did you think of McCain's 2002 endorsement of Mitt? Or did you want to ignore that fact as well?

So far, I don't see any personal attacks in this comment...just facts.

To your point, national polls don't matter yet, but if you want to base your vote on national polls, you should have been supporting Rudy. Polls are static snapshots. We the people have the ability to change the outcomes.

McCain
has been right all along about the war, but that isn't enough for me. There is an ornery streak which probably served him well in surviving years as a prisoner but is not so admirable as president.

I am also concerned about the times he has espoused issues more suitable for a democrat (immigrant, McCain-Feingold, taxes, torture, gang of 14 etc), too many times for me.

On the other hand, his contrariousness will be appealing to moderates and crossovers from the democrats and to those who mistakenly interpret his behavior as a sign of the much needed less partisan approach to governing.

I am concerned those who interpret Hugh's support for Romney as being a "shill" and now unreliable because his choice is not their choice. Doesn't a "commentator" have a right to an opinion and be able to write about that opinion?

No way for mccain
He may be a true fiscal conservative and a pro military guy (except for the treatment of terrorists). However, I could never vote for the clown for the reasons stated in the above column. I live here in AZ and have never voted for McCain, and never will.

Like Bush the first, who wasn't reelected because of his violation of his "No new Taxes" campaign promise, so too will McCain go down in flames for all his devious work agianst consrvatives and his party. Too bad, so sad.

mccain - a loser
i appreciate his military service, but what did he really do in vietnam?

he was shotdown and captured; a POW.

that's a hero??

a hero is one that captures thousands of enemy, ends the war, etc.

why do we throw around the word hero so loosely for those that do not deserve it.

mccain - feingold disaster. it is unconstitutional and if he could not figure that out then he is either incompetent or deceitful.

gang of 14 - since when has a gang been anything good? he undermined the republican leadership for his own gain. yeah, a really good guy?

mccain seems to have nothing but disdain for the public and the public needs. he is self serving and I for one will not support him under any circumstances.


No way for mccain
He may be a true fiscal conservative and a pro military guy (except for the treatment of terrorists). However, I could never vote for the clown for the reasons stated in the above column. I live here in AZ and have never voted for McCain, and never will.

Like Bush the first, who wasn't reelected because of his violation of his "No new Taxes" campaign promise, so too will McCain go down in flames for all his devious work agianst consrvatives and his party. Too bad, so sad.

Bob, Obama is a christian now
just like Romney is a christians now. Lets believe all candidates when they state their faith:)

Romney's Hypocritical Attack
It takes an awful lot of chutzpah for Mitt Romney to attack McCain yesterday in New Hampshire as "pro-amnesty," when Romney is on record just two years ago explicitly describing McCain's position as not being "amnesty:" Listen to him here:

youtube.com/watch?v=BDVKWBVk6xA&eurl=http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/12/romneys_immigration_chutzpah.html

It's one thing to switch positions on an issue. It's something else to then turn around and attack people for holding the same position you just held.

Romney's attack is so transparently hypocritical it plays directly into the core vulnerability that is undermining Romney's entire candidacy: that he'll say whatever he needs to and change his stance on any position he feels is necessary to win the Republican nomination.


Desperate Times and Desperate Measures
Here's a sampling of Hugh and Mitt's faith & politics in action:

http://onemom.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/desperate-times-desp erate-measures/

America needs leaders that inspire and unite, I say enough of the politics as usual.

Hugh
Although I agree with your points, I also agree that you should identify yourself as supporting
Romney.

I dislike the fact that both Columnists and the candidates themselves can write columns and have them posted as news, here on TH and other venues; they should be paid for and marked PAID POLITICAL AD.

McCain, Pows, politics
Opine I went to your link on Mccains Vietnam stay. I've also seen many post here about the validity of McCains torture.

I mean wow a young vietnamese nurse to attend to all his needs

He got to share crumpets and tea with a reporter

Sounds like a walk in the park to me where do I sign up.

What a CROCK

You want to take on a mans politics, then dang it take them on

When you start insulting a man who to this day obviously still shows the effects of the wounds he's had serving this nation.......well you wont win me over.

And just to be clear I've been to McCains sight and although he address issues I think are important, his past record to me makes me look elsewhere for a primary nominee. In the general I'd vote for him no problem


doug
You missed the point I was trying to make.
Wheter or not those charges are true and they do have a ring of truth, try to imagine the exaggerations and spin Democrats would add too them.

Me?
I would vote for Hillary if it would help keep McCain out of Office!
I think he is a "Manchurian Candidate" and that is just what the NRA calls him!

McCain/Feingold was just the tip of the iceburg.
McCain intends to silence political freedom!
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPrint.asp?Page=/Politics/archive /200702/POL20070214b.html


This is hilariously ironic
Considering Mitt Romney is the one who wants everyone to forget all of the different positions he has taken on the issues in the past.

The latest gem: MITT ROMNEY was PRO-AMNESTY in 2005 and 2006!!! Here is a story on it from Real Clear Politics: http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/12/romneys_i mmigration_chutzpah.html Also see http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48729032_mitt_romney_mi tt_romney_no_amnesty_romney_immigration_flip_flops

Romney Snipers
Although the article is about McCain's failings, there are those who snipe at Romney in an attempt to promote their own favorite. Romney is the near perfect candidate to lead our country except for two areas that snipers try to use to confuse....flip flop and religion.

1. He's not a flip flopper. One governs to the will and needs of one's constituants. In liberal MA some battles were lost but the war was won. Should he have stood fast and demanded conservative action on everything? Sounds good but he would never have been elected. If elected he would have accomplished little.

For all your days prepare,
and meet them ever alike.
When you are the anvil, bear,
When you are the hammer, strike.

2. Some are spinning the Mormon faith in an attempt to make him look bad. They're taking out of context, distorting, and saying crazy things about things that took place a hundred years ago. If one wanted to make Cristianity look bad to those who don't fully understand it, might they not write: Christians regularly participate in an orgy of bloodletting. They are forced to kneel while a dark garbed leader feeds tthem human flesh. They then wash down the flesh by drinking human blood. They call it Communion. The Mormon good qualities far outweigh any perceived negatives. Give it a break and ignore the crazies.

Romney has experience governing.
The 3 leading Dems. do not.

Romney has sucessfully run multiple businesses.
2 of 3 Dems have not and the 3rd, as a trial lawyer and hedge fund whore, has ruined the lives of many good people for his own financial gain.

McCain supported
embryonic stem cell research,yet another dem position. How pro-life is he? At least Romney vetoed it.http://www.issues2000.org/Social/John_McCain_Abortion.htm

They were against Reagan in 1980
The Northeast Elite/Wall Street Republicans were against Ronald Reagan in 1980 while he was seeking the party's nomination. Reagan was running as an economic populist and a social conservative...much the same as Huckabee is doing now. All the big money Republican elites were throwing their support behind George H.W. Bush in the race for the party nomination in 1980. Reagan rose to power because he brought together disaffected manufacturing laborers, the Catholic vote, the evangelical Christian vote, small business owners and middle and lower income regular folks.

Reagan overcame the establishment and won. I wonder if he could win again today? All the paid talking heads and columnists would be working in concert with the Republican Party establishment to crush Reagan's chances...much like they are now trying to do to Huckabee...and like they did in 2000 to John McCain and in 1992 to Pat Buchanan. Reagan was able to over come the monied establishment because he was able to connect with the common people. Huckabee has that gift, but he is fighting an uphill battle against the powers-that-be that is even unlike the tide Ronald Reagan had to overcome.

McCain Facts
1. He voted twice against Bush's tax cuts.
2. He told Alan Keyes in a debate that abortion was a choice for the family.Check the transcript. The debate took place on February 5th, 2000. One year before that he said that he wouldn't overturn Roe.
3. He doesn't realize that drug companies need profits to keep up with research. He has indicated that he is for the importation of generic drugs from Canada (a country that has lost the ability to produce drugs). Moreover, he's recently stated that he would weaken patent laws, so that he could help John Q. Public with costs.
4. He would micro-manage doctors if he had his way. His recent health care plan uses vague language to the effect that a doctor's pay should be tied to results.
5. He voted against ANWR.
6. He believes global warming is a crises in the making. Thus, he is the only "republican" calling for mandatory restrictions on carbon producing industries. What kind of bureaucracy would this entail?
7. He is the most ethically compromised of any of the republican candidates. The Keating five scandal involved his intervening with regulators to protect Charles Keating's S and L. McCain's family had hundreds of thousand of dollars invested with Mr. Keating. Additionally, Keating had made more than one hundred thousand dollars in campaign contributions to McCain.
8. Recently, he's expressed his anger over the destruction of the CIA "torture tapes." Aside from the fact that the tapes now may not be used as a propaganda tool by our enemies, what is he so upset about?
9. His immigration plan was weak on boarder security and enforcement, and strong on giving illegals a pathway to citizenship.
10. We're all familiar by now with his campaign finance legislation. If the bill of rights doesn't protect political speech, what good is it? 11. He has admitted to infidelities during his first marriage.

Granted, the man is a hero, but does that warrant his becoming president.?

Ernst_p, Romney and McCaine
share the same views about immigration - who knew? Now I can't wait to hear what the Romniacs will explain this one. Who made him say that? I think it was the liberal boston interviewer who put words in his mouth - what do you think? Romney is a walking joke of a liberal. I think he should at least make another speech - this one entitled "why I never held a consistent position on anything in the last 2 years " - because change is good! do you think Hugh will say anything about this interview?

To MyOpine
I did go to the links. You are living in an alternative universe.

mike
The only one of the top tier republican candidates who does NOT support the AGW scam is Fred Thompson.

MyOpine if it
was your intent to show what garbage would be able to be thrown at McCain, you did a good job.

As to the 527 restrictions article what was there were the conclusions of others as to what McCain's intentions are. I saw no quotes from McCain himself in the link you posted.

My problem with McCains positions are that they are vaguely written regardless of wether they are good ideas. Many of his efforts have worthwhile goals what happens in my opinion is he is too willing to compromise across the isle that many of his efforts outcomes confound the problem rather then add solutions.

As to the whole Manchurian candidate, who exactly is Manchuria?

And really Clinton over McCain.?


To Moses
John McCain, after taking off from a carrier, flying over Hanoi, North Vietnam and completing a bombing mission on a power plant in Hanoi, was shot down by a surface-to-air missle. The air defenses of North Vienam during the was were as tough as any American fliers ever faced. As a P.O.W., John McCain refused preferential treatment when his father was CINCPac Commander, even though John McCain was tortured.

That you denigrate John McCain's service shows you to be a complete idiot.

To MyOpine
If you would vote for Hillary Clinton in preference to McCain, as you say at 2:12 PM, then you must be a lefty troll.

Phil Byler your ability
to "suffer the fools" has surely lessened over the months.

This might still be there
Phil Byler are you set on McCain or are you just pointing out the virtures of yet another good Republican? have you picked a Candidate?

To Dan
You cite incomplete facts.

The vote against the Federal Marriage Amednment was on federalist grounds, which is the purist conservative position.

McCain is against "torture" because: (i) he experienced real torture as a P.O.W. and does not want America associated with it; (ii) the U.S. has by international convention agreed not to use torture in any situation; and (iii) McCain believes that the war with the radical jihadists is in part an ideological struggle and torture is counter-productive to winning the ideological battle.

You are mistaken about about the "Gang of 14." With that compromise, we got Roberts and Alito on the US Supreme Court and a number of conservatives on the US Courts of Appeals, and we preserved the fillibuster in case there would be a Democratic Congress (like now). Without that compromise, we don't know what we would have had. Wht do you think Chuckie Schumer is complaining about being snookered?

McCain did vote against the original Bush tax cut, but McCain sought spending cuts to go along with the original tax cuts. McCain is as strong as anyone running on keeping the tax cuts.

McCain did work with, among others, President Bush to attempt to "reform" the immigration laws. McCain is correct that on its face the proposed legislation was not amnesty. The problem is that without law enforcement, the reform would turn de facto into amnesty, just as did the immigration law signed by President Reagan did back in the 1980's. McCain says he got the message that law enforcement comes first.

McCain did sponsor the latest campaign finance reform legislation. He has supported efforts to cut the influence of money on politics. As a lawyer, though, I know that the legislation is in the hands of the courts and that it is not going to be much of a future issue.

Phil Byler
YOU are the one who lives in an "alternative universe" if you entertain any delusion that Democrats will not use such assertions against McCain.

__________________
doug;

Yes, I would vote for Hillary, a real open & aboveboard Communist before I would vote for a cheap imitation Communist puppit!

If America is going to be run into the ground by Marxists then let it be a real one instead of a stealth Communist pretending to be a Conservative so real Conservatives get the blame!



To Doug
I am a lawyer. I am in my office working while it seems most everyone else is out enjoying the holdiday season. So I am taking a few moments and probably do have less patience with what I consider appalling short sightedness and immaturity. Those on this site who lose sight of how important it is to defeat the Democrats in 2008 are being foolish. Those on this site who engage in the childish attacks on John McCain I have seen here are worse than foolish.

I have an attachment to John McCain explained in my 12:01 PM 12:14 PM posts. I am a New Yorker, so I know that Rudi Guiliani is extremely capable and Hillary is at bottom an anti-military socialist who must be beaten. I also know how the left wing MSM will have some fodder against Rudi to dirty the waters no matter what Hillary has done; I also regret that Rudi is pro-choice. Although Fred Thompson says a lot of good things, I don't think that he has the heart for the battle and his past record on certain issues is no better than the others. The same goes for Romney. I think that Mike Huckabee's record of governing causes me to look elsewhere. As Bob Novak wrote today, John McCain may be the last man standing. With the dangers we face in the world today, it is just as well -- McCain does have the endorsement of past Secretaries of State Schultz, Kissinger, Eagleburger and Haig and of such natinal security people as Inman, Woosley and MacFarlane.


Phil Byler
If McCain becomes the nominee, I'll hold my nose and vote for him, even though I am convinced he's too in love with himself and that this trait has influenced much of his actions that have earned him the label "maverick." He does appear to be too cozy with the liberal MSM, as well.

You do realize, of course, that should McCain actually win the nomination, we'll be voting with "Robert", right??? (assuming one can believe a word that "lefty" says!).

Gives me shivers.......

@ David (Re: Facts)
My beef is not with the facts you have listed -- those are indeed facts (which I will respond to below). My problem is with Hugh's impassioned insistence that Romney is our best bet against Hillary and that McCain has no chance -- even in light of HUNDREDS of polls from MANY different polling companies showing Romney getting destroyed by the Dems and McCain WINNING (fairly comofortably) against the Dems. Discount the polls all you want, but that is another typical HH/Romney spin technique. Whenever a poll shows Romney leading, the Romney supporters trumpet it and claim that this is empirical proof that Romney is unstoppable. But when a poll shows McCain or Huckabee doing well, Hugh is quick to discredit the poll, say it's baloney, etc. etc. I, for one, am sick of this hypocritical spin.

Also - note Hugh's selective quoting of articles. Just yesterday, he cited a negative quote about McCain from Thomas Sowell and used this as "proof" that the conservative movement hates McCain. But if you actually read the entire Sowell article, Sowell devoted an entire paragraph to trashing Mitt Romney as well. But of course Baghdad Hugh would never publish that. What a hack.

Now, on to your facts:

1. McCain-Feingold:
Please tell me, specifically, how McC-F has limited your freedom of speech, or that of others. How has it stifled your political expression? I sure see you speaking freely here. Hugh Hewitt continually calls McC-F "unconstitutional" - as though this were an undisputed fact. WRONG. McC-F has TWICE been upheld as CONSTITUTIONAL by the Supreme Court.

2. Tax cuts:
McCain's vote against tax cuts was because the big government Republicans refused to stop their rabid spending practices. You can't simultaneously cut taxes and continue to spend like professional liberals. That is NOT conservative.


(space limited, see next post ...)

Phil Byler: Holding My Nose
Phil Byler writes:
To Doug
... Those on this site who lose sight of how important it is to defeat the Democrats in 2008 ...

-----------------------------------------

It is extremely important to return this country to its limited government principles. Electing a Dem-lite as a means to defeat Democrats in 2008 isn't my idea of success. Because of this principle I'm very concerned that McCain isn't a reliable conservative. My frustration with the Republican Party is growing, because we are constantly asked to cave on the core principle of limited government to defeat the Dems.

I held my nose to vote for Bush 41 and like many couldn't do it twice after "Read my lips", which resulted in Clinton's election. I've held my nose twice to vote for Bush 43. Now I'm supposed to hold my nose to vote for McCain. I'm not sure I can do it again.

I reiterate that I greatly admire his service to our country and his continued support of the military. By the way, I'm a VietNam era (no time in Nam) vet and have an appreciation of military sacrifice. Congratulations to you for raising two fine sons who are in my book among the best of America. For the proven bravery of your oldest son I offer a mega-thanks.

Examples of where he lost his conservative way are found at the club for growth web site.
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/03/arizona_senator_john_m ccains_t.php
* An amendment sponsored by Senator John D. Rockefeller (D-WV) to prohibit a reduction in the top tax rate until Congress enacted legislation to provide a prescription drug benefit[10]
* An amendment sponsored by Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) against full repeal of the Death Tax.[11] This vote is in keeping with Senator McCain's 2002 vote against repealing the Death Tax[12]
* An amendment sponsored by Tom Daschle (D-SD) and co-sponsored by Senator McCain to limit tax reduction in the top tax bracket to one percentage point[13]

@ David (Re: Facts), Part 2
3. Federal Marriage Amendment:
Please tell me how it is in ANY WAY conservative to grant the federal government massive regulatory power over marriage, of all things. That is big-government liberalism. The principled conservative stand, the one McCain took, is to leave this matter where it belongs: to the states, where he would argue that each one outlaw gay marriage.

4. Gang of 14:
The Gang of 14 was perhaps the best thing to happen to Republican nominees. McCain's efforts with the Gang of 14 led DIRECTLY to the confirmations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito. Without the gang of 14, those two nominations go kaput. I challenge you to give me the names of Republican nominees who have gone down as a result. Further, McCain had the prescience and foresight to realize that the filibuster is an option that the Republican Party SHOULD AND MUST PRESERVE for the future, so we can use it to combat extremist leftist judges in the future. McCain actually looks at the big picture, and is not just a knuckleheaded reactionary.

5. Torture:
Well, seeing as McCain ACTUALLY WAS TORTURED for the better part of 5 years at the hands of the Vietcong, I think this man speaks with an authority on the issue that neither you, I, nor frankly Mitt Romney can.

6. "Amnesty":
What McCain proposed was not amnesty. What McCain proposed was strengthening our borders so that more illegals DO NOT come in. But at the same time, he realizes that addressing the borders and addressing the 20 million people that are ALREADY HERE are completely separate issues. Better to address the problem and demand that these people begin making contributions to the nation.
And even assuming, arguendo, that what McCain supports is amnesty, you have to remember - the person who proposed and saw come to fruition the LARGEST granting of amnesty for illegal aliens in the history of the United States was none other than Ronald Wilson Reagan. Do you oppose Reagan too?

Dan: Mixed McCain
Dan writes:
@ David (Re: Facts)
My beef is not with the facts you have listed -- those are indeed facts (which I will respond to below). My problem is with Hugh's impassioned insistence that Romney is our best bet against Hillary and that McCain has no chance

-------------------------------------------------

McCain's problem is that his record is mixed and therefore it will be hard for conservatives to vote for him. Your points on his record are well taken, but I offer a somewhat different take on a couple of them.

1. Mc-F: Money, as the SCOTUS says, is speech and this bad, in my view bill, regulates it with more government. It has passed Constitutional must but its results are lousy. Better is sunshine -- full disclosure and let people speak away. That's conservative, regulation of speech is not.
2. Tax Cuts: Mixed -- see my 5:14 PM post. Notice that he continues to align himself with dopey dems, which makes conservatives suspicious.
3. FMA: This one is tough. His view is that of a principled conservative. However, the SCOTUS is out of control. Dissenting in the Lawrenece Case, Scalia says "This reasoning leaves on pretty shaky grounds state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples." FMA may be a necessary evil.
4. Torture: I can operate a car, but I can't be considered an expert mechanic. Neither is McCain an expert on torture and frankly I find his holier-than-thou attitude about it annoying.

Is he STILL here?
I'll ask it again: why are we STILL even talking about Johnnie Mack? For all the reasons already cited, he's neither qualified nor on the right side. McCain-Feingold ALONE would have disqualifed him. He is badly behind in fundraising & most polls; he's still around because the established pop media (who owe him for Mc-F) & other leftie elitists buoy him up. He's this cycle's Perot.

As to his alleged change of heart on illegal aliens/border security, I find it just a little convenient as well as a little late. He was adamant about open borders until he basically got stomped over it & finally realized he wouldn't have a chance talking like that.

Somebody beat me to reminding all that he is on the "climate change" reservation drinking its Kool-Aid. The "Climate Change" dogma is one of the most dangerous causes on the table now, & will bring on one-world totalitarianism if fully implemented.

Whatever he personally in his heart of hearts believes, wherever his center lies, at the end of the day, he is still almost 180 degrees backwards on almost every issue that matters to conservatives. It is positively Orwellian how anyone can continue to argue he is a conservative for whom conservatives should support. It's an invitation to doublethink. He is distracting & disrupting, using up the political oxygen of real candidates. He both divides today's GOP & exemplifies almost everything wrong with it.

One can be against both Hillary & Mitt (& Rudy, & Mikey, 4that matter) w/o being for McCain. He's been eliminated but doesn't exit the stage. Don't go away mad, Johnnie Mack, just go away, finally.

The Romney backlash
The Romney backlash: Conservatives are coming home

Bad day for Romney!

UL-THERE IS A reason Mitt Romney has not received a single newspaper endorsement in New Hampshire. It’s the same reason his poll numbers are dropping. He has not been able to convince the people of this state that he’s the conservative he says he is.

Like a lot of people in New Hampshire, we wanted to believe Romney. We gave him the benefit of the doubt. We listened very carefully to his expertly rehearsed sales pitch. But in the end he didn’t close the deal for us. Now, two weeks before the primary, the same is happening with voters.

Republicans and right-leaning independents in New Hampshire gave Romney a chance. His events have not been sparsely attended. Nor have they been scarce. He’s made more campaign stops here this year than any other Republican, even John McCain.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/the-romney-backlas h-conservatives-are-coming-home


Thanks Phil I truely
appreciate the time and effort you put into your post.

Primus always a wiseacre,in a good way.

Let's Change Strategy
The Rupublican Party obviously does not want to run a conservative candidate. Maybe we should all forget about the presidency, and instead work togehter toward a conservative congress and senate to neutralize the coming democratic president.

Life is good
when the wingnutty right-wing in America is shrilly screaming and screeching at each other day after day after day. It's paradise - keep it up guys. The Republican party is on its way to extinction because America doesn't want big spenders, incompetent CICs, taking from the poor and giving the proceeds to the super rich. And they don't like sexually perverted Senators and Congressmen and women, whom are rampant in the ranks of the GOP.

-peace

We all know that Hugh supports
Mitt Romney. That doesn't make him a "shill". He is writing an opinion piece, articulating why he would never support John McCain. I was turned off McCain back in 2000, when he insulted the Christian right. Then the assault on free speech -- AKA McCain/Feingold took the cake, when he teamed up to squelch the rights of free people to make decisions regarding elections.

John McCain seems to me, to be a person who has great disdain for the regular Jane or Joe. He has the "elite" mentality that infects many in Congress when they've been in Washington too long. He thinks he's better, smarter, craftier, and generally more wonderful than us "great unwashed". No thanks.

I too am choosing Mitt Romney in my primary, although the nominee will already have been chosen by the time Wisconsin's primary happens. Go Mitt!!

Mom in Wisconsin (The disgusting Russ Feingold is MY SENATOR. Another reason not to support John McCain)

patriotic democrat
You seem a little confused about which party has a problem with sexual perverts.
The Democrats have a policy of procuring children for pedophiles.
http://hollycrud.com/2006/10/nancy-girl-wants-old-gays-with -young.html


As for the Presidency;
Neither Obama or Hillary have enough executive experience to run your local Wal*Mart store!
If both were white males you would not consider them candidates.

America does not need to train an Affirmative Action President on the job during wartime!
Democrats have enough problems of their own without butting into Republican internal matters.
We don't need your help, thank you!
Please try to find a viable candidate so you can provide us a better option than you did in 2004!
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/john-kerry-gained-fame-t hanks-to-phony-soldiers


McCain is, once again, looking
like a candidate I could support.

I was very excited about his candidacy for most of 2000. Then, as events turned, GW seemed the better choice. Now, eight years later, the dilemma continues. The Republican contenders are all fine candidates.....however, none seems just right. But John McCain, despite the objections of Hugh Hewitt, is the most expereinced, most inspiring, most heroic, and probably the most reasoned among them. I like him.

I miss Michael Moore...
Anybody remember our old pinata, Michael Moore?

Here's a little fun video from Fred Thompson for him...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoAB6fz8ENc&feature=related


Thompson o8

aDNA- Michael Moore's latest
escapade is taking advantage of a young woman's death in California to push once more for Socialized medicine.

aDNA - about missing Michael Moore
...perhaps you should get a scope.

"Jones"ing for Sicko
Mtn Rose

"Michael Moore's latest
escapade is taking advantage of a young woman's
death in California to push once more for
Socialized medicine."

*Charming!*

Could he name it Commonwealth Care, or is that already taken? It has that Cuban ring to it.


A scope. Snicker.
Oh, you are the first person who ever said we need a scope to see him!

ANN COULTER & RUSH LOSING LISTENER BASE!
ANN COULTER AND RUSH LIMBAUGH ARE BOTH LOSING THEIR LISTENER BASE. They both are an embarrassment to the Republican Party and Americas conservatives. They are becoming more and more out of touch with their conservative base every day. Perhaps they are connected among the political masons. Their ship is sinking and they have lost credibility. Their arrogance and pride precedes their fall.

The Shift in Momentum IS FOR PRESIDENT HUCKABEE in 2008

Mike Huckabee is presidential material and is alone able to defeat Hillary & Obama. I am now convinced that those wealthier donors to Romney's, Giuliani's, and Thompson's campaign have wasted their money and if they continue, are wasting their hard earned money on candidates who do not have voter appeal or substance. As a member of the younger generation, I will tell you point blank, Romney, Giuliani, and Thompson DO NOT connect with us.

ROMENY has run out of gas. He has been the worst investment money could buy. His persecution complex makes him so defensive, weepy and wimpy that he cracks under pressure. His fake, calculated tears make him look like a BIG WEENIE before now Czar Putin in mother Russia and rest of the world. Romneys negative campaigning reveals his unprofessional desperation and that he is really an unkind angry old man. BOTH Romney's and Giuliani's flip flop past makes them a liability and not an asset for republicans in 2008.

Every time Huckabee is heard his approval amongst Republicans and Democrats increases even WITHOUT major financial support. He is the Republican's secret weapon in the 2008 election. Huckabee's proven leadership can help bring America together as a team.

Huckabee is the BEST candidate because he not only attracts republicans but also democrats to his side without compromising his principles. Both side support is needed to win this election in 2008 and he has it.

WHY HUCKABEE WINS THE NOMINATION and the PRESIDENCY

http://evolutionfacts.townhall.com


good one, Hugh
Its about time for us to bid McCain "Hasta la Vista". I wrote him off, for good, when he took his misguided stand for "Shamnesty". Likewise, the Huckster, a bleeding heart liberal in GOPreacher's clothing, is totally out of the question.

To Elkomike
Your 12:57 PM post is NOT supported by the link you cite. The link is to a New York Times article about Special Counsel uirging the censure of ALAN CRANSTON, not JOhn McCain. All that the article reports about McCain is that Special Counsel's still confidential repport was critical of questionable judgment of four Senators, including John Glenn of Ohio and John McCain of Arizona. By no menas does the link establish that McCain was censured, which to my recollection he was not.

Your 12:57 PM post must therefore be considered dishonest. That you must know that you were being dishonest does not reflect well on you.

wasnt this about mc cain?
why all the romney stuff? worried ?if mitt pulls off iowa,n.hamp.all of your bs about abortion,gays,hunting,and his faith,immigration,
will be stuffed up where the sun doesnt shine!
yes....he was pro life at one time,yes he was never a big game safari hunter but he hunted as a
youth..and later, that covers his life span, he fought against gay marriage(spoke against gay marriage in d.c.)but believes that homosexuals, should be allowed civil rights(all you christians
think they should be rounded up and put to the fire..like hitler did the jews?!?) good christians!he advocates and advocated..get in line and apply for citizenship. i have read all the stuff you turkeys have referenced..twisted,turned, and taken out of context! but you know what folks..do you think
that the president is supposed to ignore atheist,
homosexuals,non christians,even tho they are not criminals? well...to serve all america..is what a president is supposed to do! and that man is mitt romney...and look at his personal life...he
is very conservative! if he had a GOP congress
you would see conservative accomplishments...big time..at first i was mitt..ohh well..but after all the crap i have researched against him..now iam for him..all the way. MCCAIN..MOVE TO MEXICO
THEY LOVE YOU! SARAH...SUCK A DILL PICKLE! the primaries are upon us.sooo iam going back to my life and saying good bye ..period. regardless of how much i dont like your bs..have a good life..turkeys! heh heh he elvis

McCain lost....
me a long time ago.....beginning with that little gang of his. I will not vote for this man.

Why is McCain Surging a Bit?
Because Hugh and Romney chose to campaign dirty with attack ads. Now they'll be attacking McCain but it won't help Romney, it'll help Giuliani. Hugh's strategy and campaign smarts are stooping to the level of Al Gore's IQ - the more the environmentalists try to control things the more they mess everything up.

Changing the subject slightly, here's what a bright father daughter team did to explain their choice for president - it's quite possibly the coolest grassroots campaign video yet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BZNua7TUBc

Absolutely on the money, Hugh
McCain is too old, and he has too much baggage on the issues. McCain still refuses to clarify where he stands on fiscal policy and immigration. He has shifted around all year. McCain should retire.

Phil Byler: Not Quite So Fast
Phil Byler writes:
To Elkomike
Your 12:57 PM post is NOT supported by the ...

Your 12:57 PM post must therefore be considered dishonest. That you must know that you were being dishonest does not reflect well on you.

-----------------------------------

My bad. I was not being dishonest -- I made an error, which I explain here. Although the title said censure -- my mistake; the text said rebuke. Indeed according to several web references McCain did receive a mild rebuke from the Senate. My recollection was that he had been censored and I set about to find a link that said so. I entered a subject with "censure" and then found several links that said rebuke. http://www.wmsa.net/People/john_mccain/ariz-republic_chap_ V_1999.htm is one such link. I decided to take an article that was closer to the actual time of the event and that one, unfortunately, did not say rebuke. I've double checked this reference and it does indeed say rebuke as did the original posting. I forgot to update the title before posting.

Recapping: I mentioned the Keating Five as an issue with McCain that HH didn't mention. Your response was "then say precisely what you think McCain did. I bet you can't." I did write that he was rebuked (subject said censure), which he was, for his role in the Keating Five. I think precisely what McCain did was to take money from Keating and then intervene on his behalf with regulators when Lincoln was about to go down the drain. McCain said he exercised poor judgment; the Senate rebuked him. I think that answers the question.


McCain Bottom Line
Question to Self, What Could McCain promise to get my vote?

1. Promise to veto every budget above his caps
2. Reduce government to 12% of GDP in his 8 years, which is roughly a 1% of GDP reduction per year for two terms.
3. Each year submit a budget with the planned reduction target and veto anything else that comes from the Congress. Shut down the government if he must.
4. Accept no budget that increases structural obligations, such as entitlements.
5. Budget honesty. No more gimmicks and accounting tricks are allowed. EVERYTHING is on budget.


Extra Credit:
1. Work to repeal the 17th Amendment. This would have the additional benefit of taking money out of politics.
2. Transition entitlement programs to the states.
3. Encourage Congress to impeach judges who legislate from the bench. I realize judges are a lifetime appointment; I realize they are important to the process; I realize they are supposed to be above politics. Buy hey, we nominate 1000s of them and surely some small percentage aren't too good. Shouldn't, as with all professions, we have some means of dealing with those who prove inadequate to the test? By policy we should impeach a few of them now and then.
4. Use the Bully Pulpit to shame congress (is that possible) into stopping the practice of earmarking. Use the veto pen if he must.

Extra, extra credit: Repeal the 16th Amendment

Great article Hugh!
So that's what McCain is using to get all the conservatives to forgive and forget that he's stabbed us in the back each time he had a choice?? A neuralyzer!! Hmmm. No thanks to RINO, Gang of 14 McCain. Not now. Not ever.

Hugh Retires
Well you have certainly managed to cross the threshold to one of two things ...officially becoming a Moonbat or being completely irrelevant.

It is rare ye see someone stumble on this profoundly....it was annoying at first (congrats on that) then tiresome . . .now it is simply sad.

Will you retire when McCain takes the Oval Office or use that to re-vamp your weary and increasingly misguided uninformed opinions?

Romney's and McCain's Positions - NOW
Romney is a flip-flopper, but his current positions are better than McCain's. Romney, moreover, has been consistently for tax cuts and smaller government. As an executive he proved this. McCain, on the other hand, voted against the most sweeping tax cuts since Reagan. His thinking on this, at the time, was that the tax cuts helped the rich. His alleged reasoning has since shited. Otherwise, he is now calling for bringing in generic drugs from Canada, watering down patent laws (again discouraging research on the part of drug companies), tying a doctors pay to results (one can only imagine how he would do this?), and forcing industry to place caps on carbon admissions. His positions on abortion have also changed (see transcript of his debate with Alan Keyes in February of 2000 - he was pro-choice). McCain, by the way, has admitted to adultery. Thus, in a battle of flip-floppers, a republican has to go for the one who seems to understand the free market, and has been faithful to his wife. Democrats, on the other hand, may feel more comfortable with McCain.

McCain is Legend - StarightTalker Wins!
John McCain has not changed the volume of his message, but Americans are getting to be better listeners. Straight Talk from a candidate is at first unnerving and then comforting and finally steels resolution in the auditor.

John McCain does not need a volume control, nor spin merchants. He speaks from the heart to hearts of the American People - honesty - a genuine communication innovation.

http://hickeysite.blogspot.com/2007/12/mccain-i-am-legend-h eres-truth-and-it.html

this is sooooooooo great !!! ...
I am the Token Donkey-- listen to to Hugh because the show is always interesting and he is head & shoulders the brightest guy (and most decent)on radio even if I disagree with him on most everything.

Anyhow-- it is sooooooooo great to see you all tearing each others' throats out-- failure of any one candidate to emerge as the leader speaks to the incoherence of the party, coalition, platform, media boosters, congressional leadership-- especially the Bush crowd-- and of course, you supporters.

You get the party you deserve. Ask any Democrat.


Hugh Sure Isn't Nostradomus
Hugh needs to get out of the prediction game. He is not very good at it. If worked as a Las Vegas oddsmakers he'd been shot by the mafia by now.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.