Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 13, 2006
Hugh Hewitt :: Townhall.com Columnist
Conrad Burns and the Future Of the United States Supreme Court
by Hugh Hewitt
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


If you know a voter in Montana, you might want to forward this column to him or her. The decision of Montana when it votes for a United States senator in November may very well impact your life considerably.

Justice John Paul Steven is 86. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 73. Justices Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy are both 70. Justice Stephen Breyer is 68. Justice David Souter is 67.

The current majority of the Supreme Court is pro-terrorist rights, anti-property rights, and indifferent to gun rights.

But that current majority will change --dramatically in all likelihood-- over the next six years that Montana's senator will serve.

If Montana re-elects Conrad Burns, not only will the Senate almost certainly remain in Republican control, nominees like Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito will continue to receive a yes vote from Burns, just as he voted yes on both of President Bush's nominees.

If Montana lurches way left and sends Jon Tester to D.C., not only will he vote to put Vermont's radical Patrick Leahy back in charge of the Judiciary Committee, Tester will support the obstruction that killed judicial nominee after nominee during Leahy's stretch as chairman.

George W. Bush won the Montana 2004 by 20% --266,063 to John Kerry's 173,710.

Montana is a very red state.

But it re-elected Democrat Max Baucus by an even larger margin --more than 100,000 votes-- two years earlier.

It is a difficult state for outsiders to understand, though Michael Barone's Almanac of American Politics does a fine job tracing the "two lively political traditions in Montana today."

"One draws on its heritage of class warfare politics, radical miners, and angry labor unions which made Montana for many years the most Democratic of the Rocky Mountain states," Barone explained.

But the second tradition is of "fierce opposition to higher taxes and federal government dictates."

Tester is ceratinly out of the "angry" tradition, and his supporters are part of the Great Snarl that has seized considerable power inthe Democratic Party --the Michael Moore-Howard Dean-Kosputin radicals who thrust Ned Lamont forward, though they will not be able to carry him over the victory line.

All but recognizing their loss in Connecticut, the radicals have put all their chips on Tester, and the camapign reflects their fury.

Frank Miele is the managing editor of the Kalispell, Mont. Daily Inter Lake. On October 12 he contributed an essay on the Montana Senate campaign to the Wall Street Journal that contained this telling anecdote:

A few weeks ago, for instance, the high-school auditorium in the town of Hamilton (pop. 4,500) was the scene of an embarrassing scrap. A debate between Messrs. Tester and Burns degenerated into an unruly shout-down in which an audience packed with Tester supporters heckled and cursed Mr. Burns, one even calling him a "psycho."

The troops of the hard left are all over Montana. Will they persuade this state to join them on the march out of Iraq and into a highly regulated future?

Jon Tester is campaigning on a demand that the entire Patriot Act be repealed. That plays well in some parts of the state where an intense libertarian streak dominates.

But a genuine libertarian looks at the demographics of the Supreme Court and understands that the left may well want to stop eavesdropping on terrorist, but it surely isn't giving up on its zeal to control private property and to leave farmers and ranchers burdened by, say, the Endangered Species Act and uncompensated for their loss of land use.

There are also more than 100,000 military veterans in the Big Sky State. Tester and the radical Democrats want to exit Iraq, just as they demanded and got a bug-out of Vietnam in 1974-75. This time the enemy won't be content to stay put in the the country we abandon, as ongoing violence in France and plots across the world demonstrate. Tester may well want to pretend that there isn't an enemy and it doesn't want to kill us. But the veterans and the practical people of Montana --are they willing to indulge this dangerous fanatsy?

They are certainly making Conrad Burns work for their vote, and he has been despite the rigors of the campaign on his 71 year-old frame. A good thing, that, as it concentrates the mind of not just Burns but the Republican majority that depends on the west for its energy and attachment to freedom and property rights issues.

So expect Montana to push Burns to the limit, and then send him back to keep the Senate in GOP control and the Supreme Court guarded during the tumultuous half-dozen years ahead.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Hugh Hewitt is host of a nationally syndicated radio talk show. Hugh Hewitt's new book is The War On The West.

Be the first to read Hugh Hewitt's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

I was there.
I live in Hamilton, and the debate was a disgrace. So many leftists came down from Missoula early that they took most of the seats. Local people couldn't get in.


The yelling and heckling went on from the beginning, in spite of the pleas of the moderator for civility. One thing was crystal clear. Conservatives in the audience did not know how to respond to the leftist mob.


That is a general failing of conservatives. There are just things they will not do. They are too polite to stoop to the depths that leftists inhabit routinely. Republicans and conservatives are an endangered species. They are just too polite to remain in existence.


Missoula is filled with radical leftist activists. The University of Montana is there and the town is full of brainwashed students and faculty. Many of them filled the seats at the debate, and shouted Burns down when he was speaking. There are more conservatives down here in the Bitterroot Valley. Unfortunately there are committed leftists too.


A guy named John Schneeberger is running against a friend of mine for a seat in the House. Schneeberger was until recently the head of the Montana Human Rights Alliance. The Alliance is a part of the Montana Human Rights Network. All of these people are Marxists in orientation, and recently honored Hugo Chavez by featuring a film about the little dictator at a local leftist church.


John stepped down as head of the Alliance several months ago. I understand now that he was distancing himself in order to confuse voters about who and what he really is.


He presents the usual class warfare tripe, accusing Republicans of being against the poor, etc. He dosn't want too much attention paid to his constant efforts to legalize homosexual marriage in Montana, and for sexual orientation to be included as a protected group under Hate Crimes legislation.


A few weeks ago there was a Hearing on border security co-chaired by Tom Tancredo and Denney Rheberg, the Republican Congressman. There was a demonstration outside the Hearing by the kooks of the Alliance. Schneeberger put in a brief appearance before the lefties put on their signs and officially began their demonstration. He left quickly before the cameras and the microphones got to the scene.


That coincided with the arrival of reporters, at least one of whom is a committed leftist himself. They posed a question of people going in to the Hearings. "Why are they having this here, in Hamilton?" I never heard an answer, but the question just underlined how insanely paranoid these people are.


They really believed that there was some ulterior, sinister Republican plot connected to having the Hearings in Hamilton rather than somewhere else in the state.


There is a full court press on getting John Tester elected. The Missoulian, that is published in Missoula, has abandoned any pretense of being objective, but they do not have the decency to openly endorse Tester.


It doesn't look good for Burns from here. There is one of the most vile campaigns attempting to tie him to Abramov, even though Conrad has not even been indicted. It is a constant theme in the coverage by the newspapers.


The only possible bright spot in this is that Conrad Burns has a lot of support in the Eastern part of the state. People who have always lived here say that they have never seen anything like what is happening. One thing is sure. There will be lots of people voting. It's in God's hands now.

Sanctity of Contracts
NOTE:

These remarks were prefered for Mike Adams column But the Maching would not accept them.

Herewith an alternat effort:















To Mike Adams:

In your essay you ask: `If the Constitution is a “living, breathing document” are we free to ignore original intent altogether?'

In this connection I can't here resist citing the 37-word Constitutional amendment that I formally proposed to Connecticut Congressman Stewart McKinney way back in 1983. It would read:

"The several words and phrases in this constitution shall be construed to mean what they were generally understood to mean in the United States during the period in which the enabling ratification of that language took place."

I called it the "Sanctity of Contracts" Amendment.

In a conscientious page-and-a-half reply, Donnecticut Congressman McKinney made my case. He remarked that our Constitution is a "living document" and that my Sanctity-of-Contracts amendment "would do more harm than good by preventing the Constitution from changing with the times". Apparently, the congressman was unacquainted with the Constitution's Article V, and was sympathetic with the now-escalating tendency of five U.S. justices to enact constitutional amendments by judicial fiat (the Rowe-v-Wade amendment being a notorious example).

Big Sky politics
The fight in Montana is indicative of the leftists' hatred which fuels the Socialist-Democrats national 2006 campaign.

They started with "Hate Bush" and are now spreading it down to the conservative legislative candidates.

The Socialist-Democrat Party has a strategy: create irrational hatred for the Republicans. Don't let Americans know exactly what the S-D Party stands for. Present vitriolic critiques and rants against Republicans but never, ever present an alternative idea. Whatever the Bush administration does, scream loudly and yell "foul".

If this strategy works, people in Big Sky country are in big trouble, along with the rest of the USA.

I will be praying Montana Voters read it
The thought of Democrats in control of the House is particularly scary. I agree that the GOP has disappointed me in some areas like illegal immigration, and Pork Spending, but they are far better than the Dim Rat alternative. If the Dims win...God Help Us!

Socialist Agenda
The current people controlling the democrats party are just out and out Socialists! There is just no other way to describe their beliefs and actions as I view and read the news each day. Do we want a comminists goverment in the United States? I know that is not my preference. The republicians are far from perfect, but they come a lot closer than the democrats!

This is a tough one
Dear Hugh,
As a Montanan, I have been torn since early 2005 over Conrad, who is such an utter disappointment I can scarcely describe my disillusionment. Until your column, I had resigned myself to vote either Libertarian or Constitutional or some such. My reasoning:

1. Stevens will not retire under Bush.

2. The do-nothing, earmarked Republicans will accomplish nothing in the next two years, which promise to be the lamest duck on record:

(a) the Bush '03 tax cuts will not be extended
in eithera Hastert house or a Pelosi house.

(b) the death tax will not be repealed

(c) Iraq will stay the course under either one
until 2009 under the new regime.

I simply cannot incent my beloved Republican Party for whom I have volunteered for four decades (I was a Bush 41 delegate at the Houston convention) to keep going the way it has gone under Bush. Our leadership has become lazy, visionless, porked, weak-livered, and entitlement-hungry. They are no longer Dem-lite. Dems under O'Neill or Wright would not have dreamed to foist $60 billion - 14,000 earmarks representing 25% of FY2006's budget deficit - on unsuspecting taxpayers.

Losing the House (I still don't think we will lose the Senate, even with Tester in there) would send a clear message to Republicans to get back on track. New leaders will rise up from the grassroots, and we will be better prepared for the real battle in 2008.

IF WE WIN IN 2006, WE WILL SURELY LOSE IN 2008.
IF WE LOSE IN 2006, WE HAVE A CHANCE IN 2008.

Nevertheless, Hugh, I respect you a lot (I was a year ahead of you, class of '77). You were my favorite talk show host when I could hear you in Colorado (In Bozeman MT I don't have that option; any suggestions?) I will take your latest column under strongest advisement.
Tim C

What polls are you reading?
There is no momentum for Burns in this race. (See excerpt from Rasmussen report today... the same result in every poll posted on RCP). At some point Hugh you have to get a grip on reality and concentrate on winnable races where the candidate is not so tarnished with scandal. Unfortunately Mr. Burns is suffering from the disease of 18 year incumbency... he believed he had a right to his seat so long as he brought home the pork to his state. Hence the Abramoff payoff.

Bottom line while the Supreme Court may be in the balance (for now) you can't win elections on fear when you fail to act honorably in office. This is true for both parties. The true answer is terms limits... the only way to ensure fresh minds from both parties replace those who forgot why they won their office.

October 13, 2006

Democrat Jon Tester As November 7 looms, the reelection bid of Republican U.S. Senator Conrad Burns continues to stall. State Senate President and wheat farmer Jon Tester (D) now leads 49% to 42% (see crosstabs). That’s the same seven-point margin found in the Rasmussen Reports September 20 survey.

When “leaners” are added in to the totals, Tester leads by six, 50% to 44%. Leaners are those who initially do not express a preference for one candidate or the other. However, when asked a follow-up question, they select a candidate.

Tester's support is more solid than Burns'. Ninety-one percent (91%) of Tester voters are "certain" they will vote for him. Among Burns' voters, just 81% are certain.


Tim C
If the Republicans lose in '06, there won't be any chance of winning in '08.

You can't win by losing. While you have the pulse of Big Sky country, it amazes me that you think a national Republican defeat will be good for the right.

Republicans already know they are in trouble over Iraq and illegal "immigration" and the deficit and Foley. Republicans are infamous for conducting inept campaigns (see also the 1996 Dole campaign).

That doesn't mean the Republicans should be replaced by socialist Democrats!

If Republicans are bad, Tim, why would replacing them with an even worse bunch be beneficial to Montana and the USA?

Clock Cleaning
I watched Tester, Burns debate last night. Burns not only cleand Tester's clock but blistered him as well. I was especially impressed with Burn's exposure of Tester' attempt to stick Burn's with the so called ear marks for Injuns. Burns simply pointed that Liberal Senators Stabenow, and Levin of Michigan were the ones who pedaled the Influence to the Injuns.Tester didn't seems to be confused as to what ear marks are. Obviously, he is Ignorant as to Federal and Military Budgets. Virtually all approiations for the U.S. Government is earmarked for Agencys, Programs such as Material procurement ect. While I'm at it, Sole Source Contracts (No competitive Bid) is as common as apple pie in the U.S. Government.They are 100% Legal. However Soule(Minority contract Quotas) Set asides in contracts are flagrant discrimination against white Males.

Burns will retain his Senate set.

In a Prominent Democrat's Words
"The great object of my fear is the federal judiciary. That body, like gravity, ever acting, with noiseless foot, and unalarming advance, gaining ground step by step, and holding what it gains, is ingulfing insidiously the special governments into the jaws of that which feeds them."

-- Thomas Jefferson (letter to Judge Spencer Roane, 9 March 1821)

Found this on The Patriot Post today and since it's so appropriate, I couldn't resist posting it here.

Voting Dumocrat to punish Republicans
If you are old enough to remember Jimmy "Peanut Brain" Carter or have heard of his help in negociating the Agreed Framework with North Korea, you will realize that you are not punishing only Republicans, but all Americans and that the punishment is not a "time out" for 2 years. We are still today suffering from the Supreme Court judge appointed by Jimmy "Peanut Brain" Carter. He gave away the Panama Canal and did other things that can not be reversed and that will plague us forever. Maybe you need to study all the damage done to this country because the people decided to punish the Republicans by electing a Dumocrat.

Republicans are no where near perfect, but they are light years better than the Dumocrats are in general. Dumocrats are socialist-communist agnostic humanists, who believe that only they are smart enough to KNOW what is best for you and your family. They don't just think they know better, they are 100 % sure. They don't see any moral problem with killing a baby as it is born after 9 months in the womb. They believe that same-sex marriage will not have any effect on our country in the long term and they believe that if we are nice to the Islamic terrorists, the Islamic terrorists will stop trying to conquer the rest of the world.

Here is a quote from the head of CAIR:

Here's just one example of what we need to expose:

"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth."

Do you have any idea who said this?

It was Omar Ahmad, the chairman of the board of CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations. CAIR's spokesmen appear regularly in the media complaining about the treatment of Muslims and giving us the message that "Muslims are part of the fabric of this great country and are working to build a better America."

But when speaking to a Muslim audience, as Omar Ahmad was, the message is not so benign.

If you want special rights for Islam, vote for the Dumocrats, because they don't believe what the Islamists themselves say. Sadly, too many Republicans have been suckered in by the "moderate" Islamists.

Don't believe what the main stream media tell you because they want to turn our country socialist.


Hope this helps
I haven't read much about David Scondras: A Boston Massachusetts Democratic former city councilman was arrested in a sting for soliciting sex from someone who he thought was 15 years old. The Republicans are getting beat up about the page scandal, but I'm not hearing much about a 60 year old man saying that 'prejudice exists against men who like to have sex with young boys.' This comes from police taperecording. Anyway I think this story has legs and ought to be explored.

MT Dems - vets homeless flag as blanket
A recent mailing from the MT State Democratic Party shows two apparently homeless people huddled on a park bench using a dirty American flag as a blanket. The mailing implies that this is the plight of vets because of Senator Burns, then falsely accuses him of voting against veterans in the Senate. It also promises that Mr. Tester will hand out extra welfare goodies to vets, though it doesn't say after he throws in the towel in the war.

The MT Democratic Party has no respect for veterans or our flag. To them, we are hapless homeless people with mental problems that need their welfare coddling. As a veteran, from a family of veterans, and someone whose friends are mostly veterans, I am disgusted. We're all successful. We served, we got out, and we made lives for ourselves.

Mr. Tester apparently tries to grow "organic crops." Other than politics and apparently a brief stint as a music teacher, I don't think he's ever held a meaningful job or any job for long. In the legislature he had no meaningful accomplishments. He blames the "republican controlled legislature" of the 1990s for power deregulation, but in fact the deregulation was done by the then democrat controlled public service commission. Under state law, only the PSC, not the legislature or Governor, could de-regulate. The PSC are currently being sued for fraud over that sweetheart deal. The de-regulation tall tale is another lie repeated so often and so loudly it is taken as gospel.

Contrast my grandfather, my father, myself, my uncles, my cousins, my friends - all vets, all learned trades or went to college, all got good jobs, all lived in homes, paid taxes, and accomplished things in our lives. And add the very successful former Marine Conrad Burns to that list.

Contrast us to Mr. Tester. Farmed a while, taught music a while, played politics a while. Never served in uniform, though he touts his brother's stint in the national guard as somehow applying to him. No earth shaking legislative accomplishments. No evolution in teaching. Gone back to obsolete and unprofitable farming methods and opposing most agricultural R&D. Our Democrat Governor will never realize renewable energy with Tester's "only organic crops" and has to bite his tongue to support Tester. Many of the Democrats are wondering why they should be supporting Tester given that he opposes most of the things that the state needs to survive. You'll see most of your elected local officials voting for Burns because of this.

We veterans are not the ones huddled on a bench descrating our flag, unable to succeed in the world without a gummint handout. Mr. Tester and his crowd are the ones with the problems. I'd like to see him organic farm without gubmint assistance.

Throwing in the towel in a war we are winning, and then offering extra welfare bennies as a consolation prize to the troops may appeal to some, but not to the overwhelming majority of vets.

On the polls, the local press will run whatever lie it gets paid to show. A recent ad claims that Senator Burns supports and promotes a 23% national sales tax! There is as much evidence for this as for their allegation that Burns opposed body armor for the troops. Both are compleet falsehoods, yet the ads run and no one calls BS. I'm waiting for the ads claiming Burns is a spy for Osama Bin Laden. The TV station would likely cash the check and throw the spot on prime time without even a second look.

You get the impression that most polls here call during the work day when only the unemployed are home. I've had messages on my machine. In 2000, they had Burns down by 9%. He won 51-47.

Joseph Goebbels is being proven right out here.

Matt



Military in UNIFORM in Tester ads
The MT Democratic Party sent out another attack mailing featuring a soldier, IN UNIFORM, purporting to be MTARNG, with statements disparaging Senator Burns. Under 10 USC 888 and DOD Directive 1344.10, this kid, if he is a soldier, just bought himself a court martial and it's an open and shut case. If he's not, he's impersonating a soldier - see you in federal court.

Reservists and Guard members don't have the same restrictions on politicking as active duty, but you can't put on a uniform and appear in partisan attack ads.

The sad part is that despite McCain-Feingold, the politicians who led these kids down the primrose path don't go to jail, lose rights to vote, own guns, hold office, hold professional licenses, obtain government jobs, lose veterans benefits, etc. They just go on.

This race is over the top.

Matt

Stick a finger up
and you'll realize Americans don't like failure. Bush took a month long vacation before finishing a year on the job. Bush failed to protect us on 9/11 by ignoring terrorism and a very specific CIA briefing on Bin Laden. He failed to rid Afghanistan of the Taliban, he failed to accomplish his bizzarre mission in Iraq. He failed to balance any budget year and he failed the middle class with his tax cuts aimed at his base, multi-millionaires. He succeeded in enriching oil companies and succeeded in lying to the world about Iraq WMD's. He also succeeded in "catupulting the propaganda" thanks to Hugh Hewitt, Matt Drudge, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly. How does it feel to be a stooge, Hugh?

Bush is a failure, America knows it.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.