Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Herman Cain :: Townhall.com Columnist
How High Can You Stand for Your Taxes to Go?
by Herman Cain
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Liberals and journalists are fond of telling us that raising taxes is the only way out of scary budget deficits that will be handed down to our children and grandchildren. But Americans don’t buy that argument.

In a February 2007 PSRA/Pew Research Center poll, people were asked what they thought was the best way to reduce the federal budget deficit. Only 9 percent said tax increases were the best way. A combined 69 percent said they’d rather see government reduce spending. They probably noticed the amazing economic growth this country has seen since the tax cuts went into effect.

In fact, the American Enterprise Institute’s timely compilation of public opinion on taxes reveals that Americans support tax reform – if only legislators would be honest about their tax reform plans.

A 2005 Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll asked people what they thought “tax reform” meant. Some actually said they thought it meant raising taxes! To some, it sounded like “helping the rich.” The largest group was the 31 percent who said they weren’t sure.

Americans may not know what all those politicians are talking about – who does? – but they know the tax code is crazy and that they should get to keep more of their own money. A majority are familiar with at least one “reform” proposition. More than half the respondents in a March 2007 Harris/Tax Foundation poll said they’d prefer a flat-rate tax or a national sales tax (like the FairTax) over the current graduated income tax system.

I agree with those people who think all the doubletalk about “reform” is too confusing. Besides, whenever the Democrats talk about taxes, they are talking about raising them. Americans don’t want higher taxes. What we need is a simple system where everyone can plainly see – and choose for themselves – how much tax they are paying. The only plan that even comes close to achieving that is the FairTax (http://www.fairtax.org).

Well, I don’t think we should talk about tax reform any more. No more tax reform; it’s time for replacement. We need a new system, and that’s the legislation we need to push our representatives to support.

Whether you got a refund this year or you’re still paying Uncle Sam, you can’t afford to be on the sidelines of this fight.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Herman Cain is the National Chairman of the Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute. He is the former president and CEO of Godfather’s Pizza, Inc., and currently is CEO and president of T.H.E. New Voice, Inc., a business and leadership consulting company.

Be the first to read Herman Cain's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

But Who is Jason Altmire
We conservatives have a lot to complain about. But beyond that, what are we going to DO about the situation? An easy: vote the bad guys (and gals) out, and vote the good ones in. I’m doing a series of articles about one of the bad guys, supposedly “new” Democrat Jason Altmire of Pennsylvania’s 4th District. Here’s the beginning of today’s column (one of several on him). I’d love to have you read it – click on the name above – and tell me what you think.


"In medical school . . . about a decade ago, late for a class, I cut through a hospital emergency room and came upon dozens of people on stretchers -- waiting, moaning, begging for treatment. Some elderly patients had waited for up to five days in corridors before being admitted to beds. They smelled of urine and sweat. As I navigated past the bodies, I began to question everything I thought I knew about health care -- not only in Canada, but also in the United States.... I had begun a journey into the heart of one of the great policy disasters of modern times." (Dr. David Gratzer, The Cure: How Capitalism Can Save American Heath Care)

Is this the kind of health care Pennsylvania 4th District Congressman Jason Altmire has in mind for the U.S.? Of course, the good news about the sweat- and urine-soaked patients Gratzer describes is that they all have Canada's universal health coverage. The bad news is that they're in hallways for days, waiting for someone -- anyone -- to take care of them.

Altmire admits he wants the government, mainly through Medicare, to play a much bigger role in the American health care system. He wants to reduce the role of private health insurance companies, including those providing prescription drug coverage for seniors. He wants many more Americans -- people below the age of 65 -- Medicare, whose costs are universally recognized to be out-of-control.

At the same time, Altmire says he wants "evolution, rather than revolution" in health care. He doesn't want, right now, a single-payer system like the one in Canada. However, does he really reject what's known as "Hillarycare?" One wonders, especially when remembering that, a decade-and-a-half ago, Altmire was one of the people who constructed Mrs. Clinton's plan for a government takeover of American health care.

Has he apostacized from his one-time faith in Hillarycare? One wonders, because Altmire has a consistency problem in his approach to issues. Consider his views on the Iraq War timetable . . .

(more to come)


Wonder of wonders
C5c5 asks: “How is it possible that modern day liberals cannot comprehend that tax cuts work?”

It is a wonder!!

I will try to explain it, but, first, I would like you to explain the different results of the Clinton and Bush II years. Clinton, a liberal, began his tenure by raising taxes; he then achieved an eight-year annual average real growth rate of 4.2%. Bush II, a conservative, cut taxes in his first year; he then achieved a 2.8% average annual growth rate over six years.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.