Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, August 06, 2007
Harry R. Jackson, Jr. :: Townhall.com Columnist
Why Congress May Flunk High School
by Harry R. Jackson, Jr.
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


This fall, Congress will evaluate and potentially reauthorize the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. This will be tantamount to grading education. It is important for all Americans to remember that comprehensive reform is necessary to restore our international educational edge. This reauthorization cannot deteriorate to another referendum on President Bush’s popularity. We should not allow the fate of this landmark legislation to be guided by partisan political agendas.

The real question for Washington is whether our national leaders will have the courage to combine all the resources available to the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch of our government to solve our problems. Young Americans cannot read well. Young Americans are falling behind international students in advanced scientific studies. We lost our competitive edge. Something dramatic must be done!

But why start over? A key question that Congress must debate concerning in the NCLB is whether to continue increasing the federal government's authority over education or to turn the control of American schools back to local communities and their citizens.

I believe that there must be a savvy use of the following elements to improve our educational system:

1. powerful public schools

2. competitive charter schools

3. voucher programs where appropriate

4. world-class private education

5. teacher accountability

NCLB increased federal authority by giving Congress and the U.S. Department of Education new powers to set policies governing America's public schools. The Heritage Foundation (among other groups) cites that one of the unintended consequences of this legislation is the weakening of state testing and “academic transparency.”

Despite the fact the NCLB only represented 8.5% of the total funding for public education, some constituencies were accused of reaching for the dollars – while compromising effective educational processes. Some states lowered standards, others changed how tests were evaluated, and many regions attempted to keep parents from understanding what their children were actually learning. Some groups have dubbed these changes as a “race towards the bottom.”

As states respond to the pressure of NCLB testing by lowering state standards, parents, citizens, and policymakers are denied basic information about student performance in America's schools. The loss of academic transparency will hinder parents from knowing whether or not their children are learning and will prevent policymakers from judging how well public schools are performing.

Congress must improve NCLB while avoiding the typical Washington tactic of starting all over again when a “new sheriff” comes to town. While Congress is reflecting, the Supreme Court has already spoken concerning education. On June 28, 2007 the Supreme Court ruled that voluntary plans to create racial balance in schools should stop.

When I first heard the news I was upset, believing that this was a major reversal of one of the cornerstones of civil rights legislation. Upon reflection, however, I realized that the Supreme Court decision was an indictment against a system of forced, racial integration that is not truly serving the current needs the average kid. What is needed today is not just a Supreme Court ruling but a positive plan to urgently change the structure of education. Kids of all races are in academic danger. Black and Hispanic children are especially vulnerable.

The National Center for Education statistics tell us that the majority of white kids go to schools that are predominately white and large numbers of black kids go to predominately black schools. Today racial separation in various neighborhoods is not by government fiat or prejudice - it is by choice.

In Prince George’s County, Maryland, where I pastor, we enjoy the status of being America’s wealthiest, predominately black county. Unfortunately, our school system is one of the worst in the region. In a community in which million dollar homes and Mercedes Benz are common place, quality educational programs in the schools are rare. The poor performance of students cannot be blamed on segregation alone.

In a recent meeting with Secretary Spellings of the Department of Education, she underscored the urgent needs of children of color. Citing the fact that 50% of black males do not graduate from high school on time, Spellings emphatically stated that her goal is to bring measurable results to inefficient schools. The achievement gap between black and white children is closing at the elementary school level, yet there remains a huge problem at the high school level.

During the days of the Brown VS Board of Education decision, only 24% of blacks under the age of thirty had finished high school. Today that number has grown significantly - 86.3% of black adults aged 25-29 have graduated from high school. Unfortunately this lags the 93.4% graduation rates of whites. Why are these numbers important? Educational standards have gradually been watered down over the years. Blacks and Hispanics who do not substantively progress beyond high school, will never achieve economic equality with whites.

Imagine an America in which teachers know how to deal with discipline problems, understand the culture, and help kids master basic skills of reading, writing, and arithmetic. These are the changes that America needs. Unfortunately neither the Supreme Court, the Congress, or the President alone, can make American education competitive. We need a concerted team effort.

Let’s get involved in the education of the kids we love! And let’s refuse to support politicians without substantive plans to improve education.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Bishop Harry Jackson is chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition and senior pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, MD, and co-authored, Personal Faith, Public Policy [FrontLine; March 2008] with Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council.

Be the first to read Harry Jackson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Good ideas but they won't work
Unless or until school control is local, parents won't have any say and are in fact told they are irrelevent. Just try to question ANY program at your local school and see how far you get. If you want parental involvement, YOU MUST give them a voice. But that would eliminate some favored programs and institue unfavored ones - depending on what PARENTS wanted.
Vouchers might help because failing schools would HAVE to shape up or close.
Another problem is teacher tenure. What once seemed like a good idea has eroded into 'we can't do anything because s/he has tenure.' It's like a free pass.

Agreed
Hold teachers accountable at the local level. Testing standards, school choice, and relevant curricula which don't waste kids' time are all important, but federalizing this is a surefire way for Democrats to eventually take it over, amend it, and warp it in such a way that a serious disease becomes a full-bore epidemic.

call me a cynic
The definition of a cynic: a person who tells a
painful truth!

And the truth is:
the education union has 1 interest=MONEY
the congress wants "their" money
Democrats in congrees get 90% of teachers votes. They will not give that up no matter how
bad schools get.
With out home schooling & private schools, there can be no improvement.
We produce children with bad seed.

Before you nag that last part, test it yourself-
-on your children & children of people you know.
>the painful truth<

NEA = communism
"Another problem is teacher tenure. What once seemed like a good idea has eroded into 'we can't do anything because s/he has tenure.' It's like a free pass."

The above was brought on by communists and it is next to impossible to rid the educational system of the communists which control it and misrepresent the facts of history.

my 2 cents
education starts in the home. If a child has never read a book, hates the very idea, and is FURIOUS that he is not being allowed to play with his computer or watch tv or listen to "music" and is being FORCED to go to school and sit still and listen to a teacher, how can you blame the teacher for that? How can you blame anyone but the parent(s) for that? It makes no sense.

The problem is even bigger
There's no doubt that, generally speaking, our public school system is a disgrace. However, the public school system does exactly what it sets out to do, indoctrinate the children. The goal of public education is not to educate. Look up the history of the founders of public education and read about their philosophy about the goal of public ed. It's a real eye opener. In the mean time, every time things like this debate come up, the NEA laughs all the way to the bank. The country cries out about the failure of the system to educate the kids (yes, by design) and their answer is to throw more money at it. The NEA uses the increased money to fund their indoctrination programs, the public cries out again.........The best solution would be to get government out of the education business.

The other issue that's not addressed here is our society. The family unit is a mess. Children live in single parent homes and are unsupervised while the parent works. Parents are all too happy to hand their responsibility for educating their children over to public schools. It amazes me what families will invest in recreational sports like traveling soccer, basketball etc and, by comparison, how little they invest in making sure their kid is learning basic things like reading, writing and math. If your kid's not learning, teach them yourself, network with other parents or hire a tutor.

Furthermore, look how Black children who want to achieve academically are harassed by their peers and accused of trying to be White. The Black community will cheer athletes and entertainers in their race, but look how they treat people of color who have acceled academically or who try to change the attitude of Blacks. Bill Cosby, Condi Rice........ The problem is huge and multifaceted. It won't be solved by NCLB or any other program. It will be solved when the family unit becomes strong, parents step to their responsibility and when society values education over entertainment.


Our Unconstitutional Public Schools
Under our U.S. Constitution, Congress has no delegated power over education. Thus, it is illegal and tyrannical for the federal government to control public education. The only reason for public schools, according to our founding fathers, was to perpetuate Public Virtue and to pass down the principles of Liberty, both of which are required for a free people to maintain their freedom. I do not think that there is any debate that our schools are doing neither. In fact, they are doing the opposite. What does it matter if our children can compete globally in mathematics if they lose control of their government and are no longer free? How do we expect our children to learn to control their government if they are being educated in government-controlled schools?

Every Problem has a solution
Mine is get rid of the Dept of Education. Return the decisions to the local level. Nuff Said

Leading a horse to water

I feel that education, no matter what the format, will always stumble over three fundamental obstacles that can never be completely eliminated.

1. Not everyone can be a winner. Schooling, although its agenda often gets sidetracked, is fundamentally about developing the intellect. Intelligence occurs in a bell curve. People who are well below average aren't going to do well, anymore than short people will ever do well in basketball. This doesn't have to be looked at as a disaster, just a fact of life.

2. Education always faces the question of leading the horse to water, but can you make him drink? Some people just don't like school. I know; I was one of them. I liked the teachers; I liked the other kids; I liked the intellectual stimulation; I received plenty of encouragement; I have a lifelong love of knowledge and a heavy reading habit. But as a kid I just didn't want to be cooped up indoors that much and I didn't like following orders. It's arguable that I might have done better in life if I could have overcome those aversions. It's arguable that boys in general could. A seldom-discussed limitation of schooling in general is that girls do much better (except in engineering and the hard sciences) and the gap is widening. Is that a disaster, or is it simply a fact of life that girls can sit still and follow orders more readily? Who knows?

3. No matter how much money you spend, you will eventually reach a point of diminishing returns. School districts are experiencing that already with special needs programs.

I don't know how you could ever tweak the system enough to avoid such dilemmas entirely.

Shut down the Department of Education
The solution is to get the federal government entirely out of education. The reason is that the writers idealistic solutions will never be implemented usefully at the federal level. The reason we have - or at least had - states, is that it is at the local level that people can experiment and control educational process. Over time, those with better solutions will be copied by others.

My perspective is cancel the no child left behind act.

Ironically, in the late 90's, Republicans were saying we should shut down the Department of Education entirely.

If you wonder why people can no longer figure out the differences between the Democrats and Republicans - that single issue goes directly to the heart of the problem. Republicans either believe that big government is not the answer - and follow through at every level - or they don't.

In the last decade, they seem to have completely lost this issue.

LOCAL and PARENTAL
Well Now said it best
"Unless or until school control is local, parents won't have any say and are in fact told they are irrelevant. Just try to question ANY program at your local school and see how far you get. If you want parental involvement, YOU MUST give them a voice. But that would eliminate some favored programs and institute unfavored ones - depending on what PARENTS wanted."

And I have to second what Tomgee wrote
"Education always faces the question of leading the horse to water, but can you make him drink? Some people just don't like school. I know; I was one of them"

There is tremendous pressure on the teachers in the classroom to produce results - with what? There are many kids that this "teach to the test" style IS NOT WORKING. Many kids learn BY DOING, NOT REVIEWING, (I was one, our daughter another, and from personal observation most boys) hands-on" learners are at a disadvantage here.


education failures
i am convinced that public education is simply a jobs program for those that could not make it as a doctor, dentist, lawyer, engineer, etc.

i graduated from college in 1981. i was in the engineering and science fields. i knew dozens of students that failed in the technical areas that resorted to teaching.

there are a lot of teachers that love teaching and do an excellent job, but there are many that are not qualified to teach.

i cannot tell you how many math teachers that my kids had that had very limited math skills.

my kids have dyslexia and they just get pushed through to the next grade. there is very little teaching that takes place in the school. oh they will give you a good line and have the dog and pony shows with their IEP meetings. but nothing changes. you push for more action and they have another layer of bureaucracy. the system will run you around in circles. it is simply a means of pacifying the parents with this ruse. they hope by the time the parents figure out that they have been duped, the child has graduated.

unfortunately, my kids have 2 schools. they go to public school to waste their time and then when they get home, i have to teach them.

public school is a waste of taxpayer money.

Getting rid of the DOE won't fix it
The Dept of Education is a mammoth waste but "local control" isn't the answer. The teachers' unions are huge; any school district -- even in places like New York -- is small by comparison. (I do not necessarily mean small in numbers; I mean small in power and influence.) Local school districts would be run by the teachers' unions as much as the national education establishment is.

If you really wanted to do something to help fix the mess that is American education, take the bloated budget of the Dept of Education and turn it into vouchers for private schools (or, since vouchers are a political impossibility, tuition tax credits). The private schools I am familiar with are not all that great either, but what is needed is competition. If they had to compete for students, the public schools in many places (not all, of course) would quickly improve and might actually become better than many of the private schools.

tgwWhale - good point
tgwWhale has a good point.
the teacher's union owns the system. they are not interested in teaching, just power and money.

we spend about 10k/student!

tell me that most of us on TH could not put together an education system better than what we have. just 100 students is 1 million bucks!!

we are getting ripped off by public education.

i sent my daughter to a religious high school, a boarding school, for $5500 per year. sure the books were old, the facilities a bit dated, but she got a great education. she learned math up to calculus, philosophy, spanish, latin, greek, ...


DOE is Marxist Concept

.....Our present Federally controlled Education system is right out of the Communist Manifesto ...

.....Pandm, wildflowers & Rebecca all make valid points ....

.....If Foreign countries are kicking our butt in test scores on math and science ...has anyone ever examined their system to see how it differs from ours? ...

.....the bottom line is that one cannot teach someone who does not want to learn no matter what system is used ...in order to have a successful educational system ...both parents have to value a higher education ...this value has to be passed on to their children in the form of praise ...encouragement ...help and family pride ...

.....a child who goes to school eager and motivated to learn ...will learn ...as long as the family unit is strong and supportive .....COLOSSUS

tgwwhale
You made some good points, but getting rid of the DOE would be a starting point i think.

Getting vouchers is only a political impossibility IF we allow it.
The only way to get this done is like the special
interest groups do: March to Washington & raise
hell until it's done. THE ONLY WAY!


liberal disaster

First, I will disclose that I am part of the problem (I am a teacher), and I hate that I am part of the problem.

I do have quite a few comments:

1) It is funny to see my liberal teacher friends frustrated with NCLB. They claim that it is too much bureacracy (and boy is it ever!!). They hate the government interference. Ha!! You should see them cringe when I compare NCLB to other liberal disasters!!

2) Yes, we do teach to the test. Everyday we hear about AYP and test scores. I don't have a problem teaching to the test if the test covers the CONTENT of the course. In my case, I teach Language Arts. The tests we give are basically reading comprehension tests.

3) I am not convinced that all of the tests match the content we are supposed to teach.

4) We assume all students are COLLEGE bound when in fact many are not. (In my school, only 5-10% go to college.) What are we doing to help those kids who aren't going to college?

5) In my opinion, ALL schools should be theme schools. Kids should go to schools that focus more on their interests. Competition to get into these schools is a good thing.

6) More than anything, schools need to implement policies where students and parents are responsible for the child. In our effort to help "poor" minorities and get them to school, we accept poor attendance, poor work ethic, and poor behavior. By accepting this behavior, we condemn the student to a life time of poverty.


How about student accountability?
That numbered list of who is accountable left off the most important person of all - the student. Student accountability means that a student doesn't pass until he has learned what he needs to know in order to be successful at the next level. That means no more social promotions that hide the fact that he hasn't learned. If he doesn't do any homework and doesn't do the classwork either because he's too busy passing notes or causing trouble, then he is not learning and he should be allowed to reap the results. Consequences at home work in terms of teaching kids to comply with house rules. They would work at school, too, if (and it's a big if) the teachers were allowed to give each child the grades he or she earned.

It's Working
Schools obsessing with AYP is proof that NCLB is working, as in doing what it intended to do. The only questions are whether we are measuring the right things, and measuring them correctly.

Of course, teachers are only one third of the equation. We need to find a way to create some short-term accountability among students and parents.

Teacher & Private Schools
One clue that public schools aren't good is the fact a friend of mine, a teacher, sends her kids to a private school. There is no way she wants her kids in public schools. And we live in a fairly good county schoolwise in Maryland.

She told me that teachers are allowed to only hold back a certain number of kids per year so even if your child cannot read, cannot do math, and cannot write...he/she gets pushed forward. How does that help the child!?

And parents need to be more involved. Heck, if I got a C (Mom made sure I was an A student first)...I was reprimanded and a perk was taken away until I proved I had performed better in class. If you are a C student, fine, make C's. Not everyone can be an A student (some people need to learn that too).

For those not interested in actual schooling (which is why I didn't go to college) - teach them the basics (math/science/history/reading) and how to research/learn on their own. Not to just swallow whatever is told to them is the absolute truth. I may have hated being stuck in a class I didn't care about, but I did have the love of learning instilled in me and to this day I still do research on my own on whatever topic interests me. Especially history.

Another Teacher's 2 Cents Worth
Like some earlier posters I am also a teacher. I teach history at both the high school and college levels. Trust me a conservative in a high school social studies department is a pretty rare bird.

1. Teacher’s unions are a pernicious evil. They do nothing … absolutely nothing … to advance the education of children. And yes they work very hard to foist an extremely social liberal world view upon your children. No meaningful educational reform is possible absent an all out war against the influence of teacher’s unions.

2. Far too many teachers are poorly educated. As a group “teachers” and “education majors” score the lowest on virtually every standardized test imaginable. Meaningful educational reform must find ways to attract some of the best & brightest into the field.

3. Management and oversight are a joke. Management (what in schools is called “administration”) is laughably inept in most schools but also extremely well paid. There are layer after layer of totally useless bureaucrats at the federal, state and local levels who add NOTHING to the education of students. The amount of bureaucratic churning and state/federal/locally mandated foolishness these people generate to justify themselves is staggering. Real change in education will require the elimination of many layers of useless management. (Abolishing the DOE would be a wonderful first step.)

couldn't agree more
Agent Crawfish's number 3 is absolutely true!! At my school, we rarely see our many administrators. At least in my case, my administrators work hard, but unfortunately, they work hard at all the wrong things. They do paperwork and more paperwork AND then they require us to do more and more paperwork.

Rarely, if ever, do we really work on improving instruction. My test scores are actually irrelevant in my school, but if I don't turn in my parent contact log all hell breaks loose.

And don't even get me started on the county level.

Honestly, this government monopoly has created a morass of inefficiancy.


an idea
How about at the end of each school year each class is independently tested by an outside organization...if you have too many kids test too low for what would be an acceptable margin, instead of penalizing the kids or the parents, you just withhold pay from the lousy teacher!
That should change the output quality in PGC.

"First, kill all the lawyers..."
The over-reaching, over-arching behemoth we recognize as the Federal Government MUST be STOPPED!! The Feds have NO legitimate role in education.

The industrialized version of education has led to it's own demise as a legitimate form of education. As our economy has become one of two wage earners per family, schools have simply become warehouses for our children. (Single parent families are at an obvious disadvantage.)

Teachers Unions have brought us 'mainstreaming', and like our welfare system integrated an 'underclass' permanently into our society. Class room discipline is not even a joke; it doesn't exist. And actually expecting students to perform? Only to pass the test so the school can exist one more year? Come ON!

Japanese students, who outperform ours markedly, cost a third as much per student, and COMPETE for every classroom seat. Nonperformance is met with expulsion and replacement. But our society insists on removing consequences for our actions; we'd rather be victims: it's THEIR fault.

Like many of you, my happiest day was when I learned that only I am responsible for my education, and it can take me any where I want to go. Unfortunately, due to the undermining of the public school system my sons were crippled in their appreciation for knowledge. They are only now beginning to educate themselves. Years too late.

Only when we remove all levels of government bureaucracies and return to NEIGHBORHOOD schools guided by concerned parents, not teachers, or school boards, will our children return to the literacy levels of even the early 1900's. Please, God, let us make it happen NOW!

motivation
to those of you who haven't taught...

1) Yes, there are good teachers and bad teachers. The fact that good teachers don't get rewarded for their efforts IS a problem.

2) In my opinion, merit pay is needed badly. Just give a pre-test on selected skills and a post-test. Based on student improvement, divide some sort of bonus money.

3) That said, MOTIVATION of the student is so important. It is very, very hard to teach a student who has already decided that school is a waste of time. Although I am sure good teachers try to make their classes relevant, too many students don't buy what the teacher is selling...when their culture, their friends, and even their parents don't care about education.

4) Again, give students and parents more choices.

5) Too many students don't see their options. All they see is what is in their community or culture. Truthfully, why do soooo many kids grow up to be poor??? It's because their friends and their parents are poor. Poor students can't see that their ARE other paths to other outcomes. As a teacher, I can say this to them, but truthfully, my words ring hollow to a kid growing up in the slums. He needs to see it and believe it.

Proactive not reactive
Jackson you are correct we need to get involved and ensure that our children are being educated. We have managed to develop a system in which our children are learning on to take test and not learning the material. We need to be proactive and not reactive! Thank you for the column!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.