Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 15, 2007
Harry R. Jackson, Jr. :: Townhall.com Columnist
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr: Conservative or Liberal?
by Harry R. Jackson, Jr.
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Both conservative and liberals quote Dr. King on this national holiday. Similar to the recent religious question – “What would Jesus do?” Many would-be social reformers attend to answer the question – “What would Martin do?”

Everything from legalizing gay marriage to withdrawal from Iraq have been couched in the terms: “Martin would have been for this!” The truth is that we can only take his speeches and writings and infer how he would have navigated the murky waters of the third millennium.

Therefore, before we start making pontifical statements about the nature of King’s direction, let’s review the history of which we are sure.

The first mass meeting of the Montgomery Improvement Association on December 5, 1955, attracted several thousand attendees. The newly elected president, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., was bold enough to describe the dilemma of black bus passengers and Rosa Park’s heroic act of civil disobedience committed just four days before.

Aware that discussing these issues candidly could ignite bitter, violent outbursts, King appealed to the faith of the African-American community. He encouraged his listeners to believe in the power of biblical justice. King’s sermon went one step further than most of that day by encouraging them to act on their belief in divine justice and use the American tradition of legal protest.

During the next 30 days, King received 30 to 40 threatening letters or phone calls each day. King wrote in “Stride Towards Freedom” that one night he received an ominous phone call just as he was about to doze off to sleep. The caller promised that before seven days passed, King would be sorry that he ever came to Montgomery, Alabama.

By his own admission, King was afraid and offered a desperate prayer from his kitchen table. He felt as though he could hear an inner voice saying, stand up for righteousness, stand up for truth; and God will be at your side forever.

Although King’s uncertainty disappeared, three days later his house was fire bombed. Steadied by his “kitchen prayer,” he boldly preached to the crowd that gathered outside of his badly damaged house. He sent them away with his own firebombs of love and faith instead a call to arms, riot or violent retaliation.

We celebrate Dr. King’s birthday not just because his courage and resolve advanced civil justice for blacks. His life was also a gift to all Americans. Today, his dream is a living legacy, which is still changing the nation.

There is no question that Dr. King was a great man. Yet he may not have been as unique as many would attempt to paint him. In all due respect to Martin Luther King, Jr., Rosa Parks, Ralph Abernathy, Andrew Young, and countless other civil rights luminaries, the black church was their spiritual mother. Each one of these leaders took their cues from the historic charter and mission that the Black church had set for itself. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Bishop Harry Jackson is chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition and senior pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, MD, and co-authored, Personal Faith, Public Policy [FrontLine; March 2008] with Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council.

Be the first to read Harry Jackson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

John-of-Gilknockie
I am glad you raised the communion issue. I hadnt known that. When I commented on that, I should have stated that "I would EXPECT that of HIM" - capitalizing the HIM, so the meaning was completely clear. I think it is probable that BOTH of us in fact are great admirers of him.

But by comparison to his own sense of duty, and how he faced up to difficult moral decisions, including the one to finally surrender... I thought his taking of communion was a smaller issue. I also like the fact that he would never hear of his old adversary Grant being denigrated after the war in his presence.

When I "lay the deaths of thousands" on his shoulders, I do so - not as a matter of morality, but as a matter of FACT. I do not argue that he was morally responsible for those. Quite the OPPOSITE.

I am aware that when he was offered command of the Union army before the war, the thoughts of leading an army of invasion to the South filled him with horror. I think his decision to side with the South was perhaps another of those agonising moral decisions, and I believe he made the only choice a man of his character could make.

Well, if Lincoln hadnt replaced McClellan, then as a matter of FACT, the South could possibly have WON, and we would be saying that Lee's "aggressive tactics" SAVED thousands of lives by shortening the war!! No doubt that was his intention from the beginning to the dismal end!

Your final paragraph? MOST interesting. Issues I hadnt even thought too much about! Maybe it DID have to be a "big one" for the reasons you stated. I dont know.

MLK:social conservative
I don't know what MLK would do now but we do know what he did do and what he stood for at the expense of his life. He laid down his life for his friends...
I had the priviledge of seeing for the first time a rerun of an interview MLK did on national TV with a white host, I believe the name was Douglas and another white guest.
MLK held his own with such dignity and clarity about his views on the Vietnam war and why he opposed it. If you did not know it was the 60's and MLK was dead, it could have been him talking about Iraq. I thought it appeared to be prophetic about the war in Iraq.
Thank God for rare leaders like MLK who stand up for what they believe and act on that belief and also happen to be a Christian who is black.
That is why his legacy still is sooo powerful and will continue despite all the critics, no matter what he would have been today. You can't argue with that, Mr. Liberal and Mr. Conservative!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.