Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, January 01, 2009
George Will :: Townhall.com Columnist
If You Think Health Care is Expensive...
by George Will
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- Health care, says the man most concerned with that 17 percent of America's economy, can be "a nation-ruining issue." As Michael Leavitt ends four years as secretary of health and human services, he offers this attention-arresting arithmetic: Absent fundamental reforms, over the next two decades the average American household's health care spending, including the portion of its taxes that pays for Medicare and Medicaid, will go from 23 percent to 41 percent of average household income.

It is, Leavitt says, "predictable" that today's traumatizing economic turbulence, by heightening Americans' insecurity, will complicate reforming entitlements. This, too, is predictable: By curtailing revenues, today's recession will bring closer the projected exhaustion of the Medicare Part A trust fund, from early 2019 to perhaps 2016. That should get the president-elect's attention.

When Medicare was created in 1965, America's median age was 28.4; now it is 36.6. The elderly are more numerous and medicine is more broadly competent than was then anticipated. Leavitt says that Medicare's "big three" hospital procedure expenses today are hip and knee replacements and cardiovascular operations with stents, which were not on medicine's menu in 1965.

After being elected to three terms as Utah's governor, but before coming to HHS, Leavitt headed the Environmental Protection Agency. He came to consider it a public health agency because the surge in Americans'

longevity in the last third of the 20th century correlated with cleaner air and fewer water-borne diseases. Longevity is, however, expensive, and demography is compounding the problem.

In the 43 years since America decided that health care for the elderly would be paid for by people still working, the ratio of workers to seniors has steadily declined. And the number of seniors living long enough to have five or more chronic conditions -- 23 percent of Medicare beneficiaries -- has increased. Many of those conditions could be prevented or managed by better decisions about eating, exercising and smoking. The 20 percent of Americans who still smoke are a much larger percentage of the 23 percent who consume 67 percent of Medicare spending. Furthermore, nearly 30 percent of Medicare spending pays for care in the final year of patients' lives.

Suppose, says Leavitt, buying a car were like getting a knee operation. The dealer would say he does not know the final cumulative price, so just select a car and begin using it. Then a blizzard of bills would begin to arrive -- from the chassis manufacturer, the steering-wheel manufacturer, the seat and paint manufacturers. The dealership would charge for time spent there, and a separate charge would cover the salesperson's time.

Leavitt says that until health care recipients of common procedures can get, upfront, prices they can understand and compare, there will be little accountability or discipline in the system: "In the auto industry, if the steering-wheel maker charges an exorbitant price, the car company finds a more competitive supplier. In health care, if the medical equipment supplier charges an exorbitant price, none of the other medical participants care." Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
George F. Will is a 1976 Pulitzer Prize winner whose columns are syndicated in more than 400 magazines and newspapers worldwide.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read George Will's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Single-payer systems sounds good to me!!
I am 58, single, and retired. I worked for a large company for 30 years. I retired at 55 to take care of my 90-year-old father. I am in excellent Health; knock on wood; and never needed in/out patient hospital care. When I was employed, my company paid for most of my health Benefits, where I paid approx. $100.00/month. unbeknown to me and management the company switched the benefit’s plan for all retires to a Future Health Account(FHA) $40,000. The FHA is not a portable account, and can only be applied to premiums covered by the companys retiree health benefits coverage, which is currently $750.00/month. To cover my portion the company takes $400.00 from my pension each month. If health care costs keep going up the money in the health account will obviously run out before I am eligible for Medicare. In just three years I had to pay an additional $300.00 for my health benefits coverage. At this rate if government do not step in I will end up spending over half of my pension for health care. My 401k maybe worthless by the time I reach 59 ½. I own a cute little house, my morgage is all paid for, but If something isn't done soon to revive the economy I'm not looking forward as to what the future might bring.

Competition, Greed, & Medicare
A health insurance agents perspective: Competition needs to be at the end-user level. The public needs a website to compare the firm costs of services and products, and allow a free market to regulate itself. This works very well in the complex Medicare world (go to http://www.medicare.gov). Our government bureaucracy created that website as an ironically efficient tool to compare costs of drug plans, as well as health plans, and RATE the providing companies. It allows consumers to choose what is 'best' for them. That format could be used for a national healthcare system. Why is an insurance salesman advocating a national system? Because greed and fraud are out of control at every level - consumers lie about their health; doctors, hospitals, and clinics lie about services rendered; insurance companies are top-heavy with useless management, withhold valid coverage from their subscribers, and valid reimbursements from providers..I could go on with more 1st hand experience. But, the point is, ethics are gone. You cannot control morality by legislation. Competition can. Medicare WILL have to be funded by increased taxes. There are no alternatives, because whether you balance the books at a national level, or an individual level, the money has to go from the 'haves' to the 'have nots'. Our U.S. government is to provide for the welfare of U.S. citizens. It's in the Constitution (if that's still operating).
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.